3
Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9:457–459. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/mee3 | 457 © 2017 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2017 British Ecological Society Received: 17 July 2017 | Accepted: 19 September 2017 DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12906 FORUM Adaptive parental effects and how to estimate them: A comment to Bonduriansky and Crean Leif Engqvist 1 | Klaus Reinhold 2 1 Behavioural Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 2 Evolutionary Biology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany Correspondence Leif Engqvist Email: [email protected] Handling Editor: Matthew Davey Abstract 1. To fully understand the evolution of adaptive parental effects we need to reliably estimate their magnitude. 2. Recently, we (Engqvist & Reinhold, 2016, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 1482) highlighted some important problems when estimating the magnitude of anticipa- tory parental effects in the so-called match/mismatch experiments. As the signa- ture of such parental effects is a statistical interaction between parental environment and offspring environment, it will be difficult to disentangle these effects from other effects depending on a combination of parental and offspring environment, such as context-dependent silver-spoon (= condition-transfer) effects. 3. In a recent article, Bonduriansky and Crean (2017, Methods in Ecology and Evolution) suggested to manipulate environmental quality on a continuous scale and using a geometric framework as a way out of this dilemma. 4. Here, we highlight and discuss the benefits and potential drawbacks of the sug- gested method. We conclude that using this approach, one may extract more de- tailed information but unfortunately, it will not resolve the interpretive ambiguity inherent in this experimental design. KEYWORDS adaptive parental effects, condition-transfer, silver-spoon effects, statistical interactions In their article, Bonduriansky and Crean (2017) make some very im- portant and insightful remarks on the study of parental effects. We certainly agree with the tenor of the article arguing that the study of parental effects will gain by focussing more on the potential adaptive value of what they refer to as condition-transfer effects and welcome this scientific discussion. Nevertheless, as we identified a few poten- tially confusing issues regarding the final part of the article, where they introduce the geometric framework as a means to study adaptive pa- rental effects, we feel that this comment is necessary. Very recently, we highlighted an important pitfall regarding the experimental design aimed to study anticipatory parental effects (Engqvist & Reinhold, 2016). Such parental effects are similar to condition-transfer effects—also referred to as carry-over effects or silver-spoon effects (Uller, Nakagawa, & English, 2013)—in that they both constitute trans-generationally induced phenotypic plasticity in offspring. However, these two parental effects are also inherently different. Condition-transfer indicates that parent condition will induce higher offspring condition irrespective of offspring envi- ronmental quality (yet importantly, the magnitude may be context- dependent). Anticipatory effects, on the other hand, crucially depend on a match between parent and offspring environmental quality. The concern we expressed in our article (Engqvist & Reinhold, 2016), is that in a two-factorial design varying parental and offspring environmental quality, the two parental effects will be statistically confounded. For a full treatment of this, we refer the reader to our original article. Shortly stated, the problem is that this experiment cannot disentangle be- tween anticipatory parental effects and context-dependent condition- transfer-effects. For example, it may signify anticipatory effects if offspring are doing relatively better in a good quality environment if their parents came from a similar environment, but it may equally well indicate that condition-transfer effects are more pronounced in good quality environments.

Adaptive parental effects and how to estimate them: A comment …behav.zoology.unibe.ch/sysuif/uploads/files/Engqvist 2018... · 2018. 3. 9. · Email: [email protected]

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Adaptive parental effects and how to estimate them: A comment …behav.zoology.unibe.ch/sysuif/uploads/files/Engqvist 2018... · 2018. 3. 9. · Email: leif.engqvist@iee.unibe.ch

Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9:457–459. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/mee3  | 457© 2017 The Authors. Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2017 British Ecological Society

Received:17July2017  |  Accepted:19September2017DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12906

F O R U M

Adaptive parental effects and how to estimate them: A comment to Bonduriansky and Crean

Leif Engqvist1  | Klaus Reinhold2

1BehaviouralEcology,InstituteofEcologyandEvolution,UniversityofBern,Bern,Switzerland2EvolutionaryBiology,BielefeldUniversity,Bielefeld,Germany

CorrespondenceLeifEngqvistEmail:[email protected]

HandlingEditor:MatthewDavey

Abstract1. Tofullyunderstandtheevolutionofadaptiveparentaleffectsweneedtoreliablyestimatetheirmagnitude.

2. Recently,we(Engqvist&Reinhold,2016,Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 1482) highlightedsomeimportantproblemswhenestimatingthemagnitudeofanticipa-toryparentaleffectsintheso-calledmatch/mismatchexperiments.Asthesigna-tureofsuchparentaleffectsisastatisticalinteractionbetweenparentalenvironmentand offspring environment, it will be difficult to disentangle these effects fromothereffectsdependingonacombinationofparentalandoffspringenvironment,suchascontext-dependentsilver-spoon(=condition-transfer)effects.

3. Inarecentarticle,BondurianskyandCrean(2017,Methods in Ecology and Evolution) suggestedtomanipulateenvironmentalqualityonacontinuousscaleandusingageometricframeworkasawayoutofthisdilemma.

4. Here,wehighlightanddiscussthebenefitsandpotentialdrawbacksof thesug-gestedmethod.Weconcludethatusingthisapproach,onemayextractmorede-tailedinformationbutunfortunately,itwillnotresolvetheinterpretiveambiguityinherentinthisexperimentaldesign.

K E Y W O R D S

adaptiveparentaleffects,condition-transfer,silver-spooneffects,statisticalinteractions

Intheirarticle,BondurianskyandCrean (2017)makesomevery im-portantand insightful remarkson the studyofparentaleffects.Wecertainlyagreewiththetenorofthearticlearguingthatthestudyofparentaleffectswillgainbyfocussingmoreonthepotentialadaptivevalueofwhattheyrefertoascondition-transfereffectsandwelcomethisscientificdiscussion.Nevertheless,asweidentifiedafewpoten-tiallyconfusingissuesregardingthefinalpartofthearticle,wheretheyintroducethegeometricframeworkasameanstostudyadaptivepa-rentaleffects,wefeelthatthiscommentisnecessary.

Very recently,we highlighted an important pitfall regarding theexperimental design aimed to study anticipatory parental effects(Engqvist & Reinhold, 2016). Such parental effects are similar tocondition-transfer effects—also referred to as carry-over effects orsilver-spooneffects (Uller,Nakagawa,&English,2013)—inthattheyboth constitute trans-generationally induced phenotypic plasticityinoffspring.However,thesetwoparentaleffectsarealsoinherently

different. Condition-transfer indicates that parent condition will induce higher offspring condition irrespective of offspring envi-ronmental quality (yet importantly, themagnitudemay be context-dependent).Anticipatoryeffects,ontheotherhand,cruciallydependonamatchbetweenparentandoffspringenvironmentalquality.Theconcernweexpressedinourarticle(Engqvist&Reinhold,2016),isthatinatwo-factorialdesignvaryingparentalandoffspringenvironmentalquality,thetwoparentaleffectswillbestatisticallyconfounded.Forafulltreatmentofthis,wereferthereadertoouroriginalarticle.Shortlystated, the problem is that this experiment cannot disentangle be-tweenanticipatoryparentaleffectsandcontext-dependentcondition-transfer-effects. For example, it may signify anticipatory effects ifoffspringaredoingrelativelybetterinagoodqualityenvironmentiftheirparentscamefromasimilarenvironment,butitmayequallywellindicatethatcondition-transfereffectsaremorepronouncedingoodqualityenvironments.

Page 2: Adaptive parental effects and how to estimate them: A comment …behav.zoology.unibe.ch/sysuif/uploads/files/Engqvist 2018... · 2018. 3. 9. · Email: leif.engqvist@iee.unibe.ch

458  |    Methods in Ecology and Evolu on ENGQVIST aNd REINHOLd

TosolvethisproblemBondurianskyandCrean(2017)suggesttoexpandthelevelofmeasurementssothatbothparentaloffspringen-vironmentalfactorsspanabroadrangeoflevels.Byanalysingthedatawithinageometric framework, theyarguethat itwillbepossibletodetectcomplexinteractionsandnonlineareffects.Theyfurtherassurethereaderthat“[…]assessingoffspringperformanceacrossmultipleenvironmentswillmakeitpossibletodetectconditiontransfereffectsaswellasanticipatoryeffects,andtodeterminehowtheestimatedmagnitudesoftheseeffectsvarywithparentalandoffspringenviron-ment.”Theysummarizetheirargumentbystating“[…]parentalcondi-tion canbemanipulated simultaneouslywithoffspringenvironmentquality,providingadetailedpictureofhowparentalcondition-transfereffects interactwithoffspring condition.This approach canmake itpossible to detect condition-transfer effects, anticipatory effects,andcombinationsofbothtypesofeffects.”This isaverystrongar-gument,andassuch,thiswouldindeedbeatremendousprogressto

thecurrentstate-of-the-art.Unfortunately,BondurianskyandCrean(2017) providevery little details to support their argument andwethereforedecidedtoexamineitindetail.

In abstract theoretical terms, we can express parental carry-over effects combined with immediate offspring environmental ef-fects.Assumingclonal reproductionandnegligiblegeneticvariation,the expected offspring phenotype (Y) can be written as follows:Y= fP

(

xp)

+ fO(

xO)

+ fP×O(

xP, xO)

(cf. e.g. Kuijper & Hoyle, 2015).Here, xp and xO describes theparental andoffspring environmentalquality,respectively;thefP and fOarefunctionsthatdescribethephe-notypic effect of these, that is, the parental condition-transfer andimmediateoffspringenvironmentaleffects.Finally,fP×O isafunctionthat describes inwhichway the magnitude of potential condition-transfereffectsdependsontheoffspringenvironment.Ifweaddtheinfluenceofanticipatoryparentaleffects,weendupwithaverysimilarexpression: Y= fP

(

xP)

+ fO(

xO)

+ fP×O(

xP, xO)

+ fAE(

xP, xO)

. Here fAE

F IGURE  1 Schematicillustrationsoffourdifferentoutcomes,usingageometricframework.Coloursdepictincreasingoffspringfitnessfromlow(blue)tohigh(red).Linesareiso-fitnesslines.In(a)aspotlessanticipatoryparentaleffectscenarioisillustrated.Offspringarealwaysdoingbestthemoresimilartheenvironmentistotheoneexperiencedbytheirparents.In(b)asituationisdepictedwheremoderatecondition-transfereffects(seenasasubtleriseonthehorizontalplane)andstrongimmediateoffspringenvironmentaleffects(seenasanobviousriseontheverticalplane)actadditively.In(c)theeffectsfrom(a)and(b)arecombined.Theanticipatoryeffectsarelessobviousbuttheinteractionisstillvisibleasconcaveiso-fitnesslinescausingaridgeinthexy-plane.In(d)therearenoanticipatoryparentaleffectsandthecondition-transfereffectsarecontext-dependent,beingstrongerifoffspringenvironmentalqualityispoorthanwhenoffspringenvironmentalqualityisgood.Thisinteractionisvisibleasconvexiso-fitnesslinescausingadepressioninthexy-plane.Clearly,suchcontext-dependentcondition-transfereffectswillstatisticallyobscuretrueanticipatoryparentaleffects.Parametervalues:(a)fP= fO= fP×O=0, fAE=2 ⋅xPxO−x2

P−x2

O;(b)

fP=xP, fO=2.5xO, fP×O= fAE=0;(c)fP=xP, fO=2.5xO, fP×O=0,fAE=2 ⋅xPxO−x2P−x2

O;(d)fP=xP, fO=2.5xO + fP×O=−xPxO, fAE=0;seetextfor

furtherdetails

Parental environment quality

Offs

prin

g en

viro

nmen

t qua

lity

Parental environment quality

Offs

prin

g en

viro

nmen

t qua

lity

Parental environment quality

Offs

prin

g en

viro

nmen

t qua

lity

Parental environment quality

Offs

prin

g en

viro

nmen

t qua

lity

(a) Anticipatory parental effects only

(c) Anticipatory parental plus moderate condition-transfer and strong immediate environmental effects

(b) Moderate condition−transfer and strongimmediate environmental effects

(d) Context dependent condition−transfer effects

Page 3: Adaptive parental effects and how to estimate them: A comment …behav.zoology.unibe.ch/sysuif/uploads/files/Engqvist 2018... · 2018. 3. 9. · Email: leif.engqvist@iee.unibe.ch

     |  459Methods in Ecology and Evolu onENGQVIST aNd REINHOLd

describesthephenotypiceffectattributabletothematch/mismatchof parent-offspring environments, that is, the anticipatory parentaleffects.

What is important is thattheeffectoffP×O and fAEwillbesta-tistically confounded within the parent-offspring-environment-interaction.They are both bivariate functions of the parental andtheoffspringenvironmentalqualityanditisthereforenotpossibleto vary them independently from each other in a straightforwardmanner.Ascanbeseenfromtheequationabove,thisdoesnotde-pendonthescaleofmeasurementofeitherparentalenvironment(xp)noroffspringenvironment(xO).Itthusdoesnotmatterforourargumentwhetherenvironmentalqualityismeasuredonadiscretescale(suchasgood/bad)oronacontinuousscale.InEngqvistandReinhold(2016),weillustratedtheproblemusingthediscretecase.The problem remains for the continuous case (see Figure1), con-trastingBondurianskyandCrean’s(2017)argumentthatthiswouldsolvetheproblem.

Insummary,wedonotwanttodiscourageresearchersinterestedinadaptiveparentaleffectstousethegeometricframeworkasout-linedbyBondurianskyandCrean(2017).Certainly,amorefine-tunedexperimentalvariationinparentalenvironmentalqualitywillallowforamore fine-tuned investigationof itseffects, suchas thedetectionofnonlinearpatterns,notfeasiblewithasimpletwo-factorialdesign.Nevertheless,itwillnotbyitselfresolvetheproblematicissueprevi-ouslyoutlinedbyus(Engqvist&Reinhold,2016).Itmaybepossibletorevealcomplexinteractionsusingthegeometricframework.However,it cannot reveal causality, that is, whether anticipatory effects orcontext-dependentcondition-transfereffectsarecausing the statis-tical interaction.We argue that sophisticated experimental controlsarenecessary for thispurpose, asoutlined indetail inEngqvist andReinhold(2016).

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

L.E.andK.R.togetherdiscussedtheargumentsandthegeneralout-line.L.E.draftedthefirstversionofthemanuscriptandK.R.providedcommentsandfinalisedit.

DATA ACCESSIBILITY

Thismanuscriptdoesnotincludeanydata.

ORCID

Leif Engqvist http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9434-7130

REFERENCES

Bonduriansky, R., & Crean, A. J. (2017). What are parental condition-transfereffectsandhowcantheybedetected?Methods in Ecology and Evolution,https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12848.

Engqvist,L.,&Reinhold,K.(2016).Adaptivetrans-generationalphenotypicplasticityandthelackofanexperimentalcontrol inreciprocalmatch/mismatchexperiments.Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 1482–1488.

Kuijper,B.,&Hoyle,R.A. (2015).When to relyonmaternaleffectsandwhenonphenotypicplasticity?Evolution, 69, 950–968.

Uller,T.,Nakagawa,S.,&English,S.(2013).Weakevidenceforanticipatoryparentaleffects inplantsandanimals.Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 26, 2161–2170.

How to cite this article:EngqvistL,ReinholdK.Adaptiveparentaleffectsandhowtoestimatethem:AcommenttoBondurianskyandCrean.Methods Ecol Evol. 2018;9:457–459. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12906