SPECIAL

AD-A203 852NA TO A T 40 YEA R&

A CRITCAL ASSESSMENT

JANUARY 1989

ELECTE 0

89 ~127 1O27

SERE

NATO AT 40 YEA R&A CRITCAL ASSESSMET

JANUARY 1989

JANUARY 198

I NTRODUCTION

This bibliography was prepared for the Department ofPolitical Science to assist participants in the 31st AirForce Academy Assembly to be held at the United States AirForce Academy from 13 to IS March 198g. It represents ahighly selected portion of the U.S. Air Force AcademyLibrary's holdings on the topic indicated. Included arebooks, Journals, government documents and technicalreports. Not selected for inclusion in this bibliographywere newspaper articles and journal titles whose entire runwould be pertinent to the topic; e.g., Atlantic CommunityQuarterly, NATO's 18 Nations, and NATO Review.

This bibliography was compiled by members of theReference Branch of the Academy Library. The manuscript forthe printer was prepared using the Pro-Cite Bibliographicsoftware.

RIEH/SCHAEFKR, Lt Col, USAFREINER ADirectooAcdmLirie

TABLE OF CONTETS - '

I. ALLIANCE THEORY/THE ORIGINS OF NATO . 1

II. .' THE MILITARY DALANCE : EAST AND WEST ........ 4

II1. COOPERATION AND CONFLICT IN THE ALLIANCE'.. - 13

IV. NATO STRATEGY), ......................... ..... 27

V. ARMS CONTROL AND THE ALLIANCE ................. 40

VI. NATO'S FUTURE ......... ...................... 44

Arcc;s!' m For

ByDiJstributi on/ OI

COPYfAvailability Codes *,Cfl~

Avail and/or 0Dist Special

I. ALLIANCE THEORY/THE ORIGINS OF NATO

Achilles, Theodore C. 'Ambassador Tells How NATO Began.' ArmyNavy Air Force Register. 77 (29 Sept. 1956): 13-14.

Achilles, Theodore C. 'Ernest Bevin, Real Father of NorthAtlantic Treaty.' Army Navy Air Force Register. 77 (22Sept. 1956): 1+.

Braucher, E. P. "The Original United States Concept of NATO.'Air University Review. 17 (Sept./Oct. 1966): 12-22.

Cleveland, Harlan. 'The Transformation of NATO.' Military

Review. 48 (May 1968): 50-55.

Cline, Ray S. World Power Trends and U.S. Foreign Policy for the1980's. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1980. (JX 1395 .C5761980)

de Staercke, Andre et al. NATO's Anxious Birth: The PropheticVision of the 1940's. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1985.(UA 646.3 .N2468 1985)

Degenhardt, Henry W. Treaties and Alliances of the World.Essex, U. K.: Longman, 1986. (JX 4005 .T72 1986)

Dials, George E. 'NATO-Alliance in Transition.' Army. 25 (Feb.1975): 10+.

Emme, E. M. 'Politico-Military Aspects of Western Defense Underthe North Atlantic Pact.* Air University Quarterly Review.4 .2 (Fall 1950): 40-55.

Godson, Joseph ed. 35 Years of NATO ! a Transatlantic Symposiumon the Changing Political, Economic, and Military Setting.New York: Dodd, Mead, 1985, c1984. (UA 646.3 .A14 1985)

Gordon, Colin. The Atlantic Alliance : A Bibliography. NewYork: Nichols Pub. Co, 1978. (Z 6464 N65 367 1978)

Banning, Hugh. NATO, Our Guarantee of Peace. Washington:Brassey's Defence Publishers, 1986. (JX 1393 .N67 H36 1986)

Henderson, Nicholas. The Birth of NATO. Boulder, CO: WestviewPress, 1983. (UA 646.3 .H35 1983)

Henrikson, Alan K. 'The Creation of the North Atlantic Alliance.1948-1952." Naval War College Review. 33 (May/June 1980):4-39

Jones, David C. "Reappraising the Prospects for NATO.'Strategic Review. 2 (Fall 1974): 9-12.

Kann, Robert A. *Alliances Versus Ententes." World Politics.28 .4 (July 1978): 611-821.

Kaplan, Lawrence S. Community of Interests - NATO and theMilitary Assistance Profram, 1948-1951. Washington: OPO,1980. (Gov Docs D 1.2: C 78/6/948-51)

Kaplan, Lawrence S.. and Robert W. Clawson. *de. NATO AfterThirty Years. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources, 1981.(UA 646.3 .N227)

Kaplan, Lawrence S. The United States and NATO : The FormativeYears. Lexington. KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1984.(JX 1393 .N67 K37 1984)

Kennedy, Thomas J.,Jr. NATO Politico-Military Consultation.Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press, 1984.(Gov Docs D 5.409:84-3)

Komer, Robert W. *The Origins and Objectives.' NATO Review. 26(June 1978): 9-12.

Lambe, W. 0. A. *The North Atlantic Treaty Organization."Canadian Army Journal. 5 .9 (Dec. 1951): 5-14.

Mendershausen, H. The Atlantic Defense Relationship: Care,Troubles, Prospects. Santa Monica, CA.: Rand Corp., 1974.(RAND P-5262)

Mets, David R. NATO. Alliance for Peace- New York: J. Messner.1981. (UA 646.3 .M38)

Miksche, Ferdinand 0. 'The Future of NATO: A European View.'Military Review. 48 (Feb. 1968): 9-13.

Milton, T. R. 'NATO and the Aging Process.' Strategic Review.2 (Winter 1974): 39-43.

NATO, a Bibliography and Resource Guide. New York: Garland Pub,1985. (UA 646.3 .N224 1985)

'The North Atlantic Treaty, an Analysis of its Priorities."Defense and Foreign Affairs Digest. 3 (Feb. 1975): 7-12.

Oldfield, Barney. *In the Beginning- There Was a Treaty." Army.19 (Apr. 1964): 52-59.

2

Park, William. Defending the West : A History of NATO. Boulder.CO: Westview Press. 1986. (UA646.3 P277 1986)

Ray, Jayanta K. Public Policy and Global Reality: Some Aspectsof American Alliance Policy. New Delhi: Radiant Publishers,1977. (DS 33.4 .U6 R38)

Reid, Escott. Time of Fear and Hope : the Making of the NorthAtlantic Treat, i947-1949. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.1977. (JX 1393 .N67 R44)

Sabrosky. Alan N. and Charles F. Doran. Alliances in U.S.Foreign Policy: Issue in the Quest for Collective Defense.Boulder, CO: Westview Press. 1988. (E 876 .A46 1988)

Security Issues Symposium, Strateties, Alliances, and MilitaryPower: Changing Roles, Leyden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1977. (UA 23.S4 1976)

Staercke, Andre de, and Nicholas Sherwen. eds. NATO's AnxiousBirth : The Prophetic Vision of the 1940s. New York: St.Martin's Press, 1985. (UA 646.3 .N2468 1985)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. TheCrisis in NATO. Hearings. 89th Cong., 2nd sees.Washington: GPO, 1966. (Gov Docs Y 4.F 476/1:N 81)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. NATOToday: The Alliance in Evolution. Committee Print. 97thCong., 2nd sees. Washington: GPO, 1982. (Gov Docs Y 4 .F76/2: N 81a/12)

Van Campen, S. I. P. 'NATO: A Balance Sheet After ThirtyYears." Orbis. 23 .2 (Summer 1979): 261-270.

Voss, Earl H. Defending Europe With Blunderbusses. Washington:American Enterprise Institute. 1974. (UA 646.3 .V67)

Ward, Michael D. Research Gaps in Alliance Dynamics. Denver,CO: Graduate School of International Studies. University ofDenver, 1982. (JX 4005 .W34 1982)

Washington Center of Foreign Policy Research. The Future Role ofMilitary Alliances. Washington, D.C : Johns HopkinsUniversity. 1966. (UA 12 .W31)

Wright, J. "North Atlantic Treaty Organization.' ArmyInformation Digest. 6 (July 1951): 24-30.

3

Il. THE MILITARY BALANCE: EAST AND WEST

Allsman. Gerald F. Politics and the Withdrawal of NuclearWeapons from Europe. Maxwell Air Force Base. AL: AirUniversity, 1976. (UGB 907 A42 5835)

Anderson. Frederic M. 'Weapons Procurement Collaboration: A NewEra for NAT0

9 " Orbis. 20 .4 (Winter 1977): 965-990.

Armitage. M. J., and R. A. Mason. Air Power in the Nuclear Age.Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 1985.

Armstrong. Alan P. 'Nuclear Weapons and NATO.' Military Review60 (May 1980): 11-17.

Bambini, Adrian P. Jr. 'Chemicai Warfare and the NATOAlliance.' Military Review. 61 (Apr. 1981): 27-33.

Bellany. Ian and Tim Huxley, eds. New Conventional Weapons andWestern Defence. Totowa. N.J: F. Cass. I87. (UA 646.3.N474 1987)

Bennington. Gerald W. The NATO Multilateral Force: is This theAnswer to NATO's Nuclear D1lemma Maxwell Air Force Base.AL: Air War College. Air University. 1964, (UA 646 3 B47)

Bethlen. Steven and Ivan Volgyes. eds. Europe and theSuperpowers : Political. Economic, and MilitarV Policies inthe 1980's. Boulder. CO: Westview Press. 1985. (UA 646E923 1985)

Betit, Eugene D. 'Soviet Tactical Doctrine and Capabilities andNATO's Strategic Defense.' Strategic Review. 4 .4 (Fall1976): 95-107.

Bloemer. Klaus. 'Freedom for Europe. East and West.' ForeignPolicy. 50 (Spring 1983): 23-38.

Buchan, Alastair. The Multilateral Force : An HistoricalPerspective. London: Institute for Strategic Studies. 1964.(U 162 A23 no.13)

Canby, Steven L. The Alliance and Europe: Part IV. MilitaryDoctrine and Technology. London: International Institute forStrategic Studies. 1975. (U 162 .A23 no. 109)

Canby, Steven and Ingemar Dorier. 'More Troops. Fewer Missiles.Foreign Policy. 53 (Winter 1983): 3-17.

4

Carrington, William M. NATO's Institute for ProfessionalDevelopment. Maxwell Air Force Base, Ala: Air War College,Air University, 1913. (UGB 907 .A42 4870)

Case, Frank B. "Th* Continuing Need for NATO.' Military Review.45 (Oct. 1965)* 61-87.

Cimbala, Stephen J. NATO Vulnerabilities: Is Defeat Possible?'Military Review. 65 (June 1985): 58-70.

Clarke, John L. 'New Directions in Franco-German MilitaryCooperation.' Parameters. 18 (Sep. 1988): 76-86.

Clemens, Walter C. *NATO and the Warsaw Pact: Comparisons andContrasts.' Parameters. 4 .2 (1974): 13-22.

Cliffe, Trevor. Military Technology and the European Balance.London: International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1972.(U 162 .A23 no. 89)

The Communist Bloc and the Free World. London, England:Institute for Strategic Studies, 1960. (UA 646 .L84 1960)

The Communist Bloc and the Western Alliances. 2 vols. London:Tnstitute for Strategic Studies, 1961-1963. (UA 646 .L841981-63)

Cotter. Donald R., Hansen, James H., and Kirk McConnell. TheNuclear 'Balance* In Europe : Status. Trends, Implications.Cambridge. MA: Un,ted States Strategic Institute, c1983. (UA846.3 .C68 1983)

Cromwell, William C. "Europe and the 'Structure of Peace'Orbls. 22 .1 (Spring 1979): 11-36.

Davis, P. K. The Role of Uncertainty in Assessing the NATO-PactCentral-Reion Ba1ane. Santa Monica. CA : Rand Corp.. 1988.(RAND P-7427)

Dewey, Arthur E. 'The Nordic Balance.' Strategic Review. 4 .4(Fall 1978: 49-60.

Dodd. Norman L. 'Britain's Most Important Defense Investment.'Military Review. 57 .7 (July 1977): 81-92.

Epstein. Joshua M. 'Dynamic Analysis and the ConventionalBalance in Europe.' International Security. 12 (Spring1988): 154-165.

5

Epstein, Joshua M. 'On Conventional Deterrence in Europe:Questions of Soviet Confidence.* Orbis. 26 .1 (Spring1982): 71-88.

Erickson. John. "MBFR (Mutual and Balanced Force Reduction):Force Levels and Security Requirements.' Strategic Review.I (Summer 1973): 28-43.

Evans, R. S. *The Need for Offensive Operations on Land.'Military Review. 57 .7 (July 1977): 44-52.

Even-tov, Ont. *The NATO Conventional Defense: Back to Reality.'Orbis. 23 .1 (Spring 1979): 35-50.

Farquharson, W. John. 'West German Panzers Train at Shilo."Military Review. 57 .7 (July 1977): 76-80.

Gabriel. Richard A., ed. NATO and the Warsaw Pact : A CombatAssessment. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1983. (UA 646.N37 1983)

Cans. Daniel. 'Neutron Weapons: Solution to a Surprise Attack'(Parts I and II)(Analyzes the North Atlantic TreatyOrganization's Potential Use of Enhanced Radiation/ReducedBlast Weapons to Increase Deterrence Until Perceived DefenseWeaknesses Can Be Corrected)." Military Review. 62 (Jan.1982 and Feb. 1982): 19-37 and 55-73.

Garner, William V. Soviet Threat Perceptions of NATO'sEurostrategic Missiles. Paris: Atlantic Institute forInternational Affairs. 1983. (UA 646.3 .028 1983)

Garnett, John C.. ed. The Defence of Western Europe: PPresented at the National Defence College. New York: St.Martin's Press, 1974. (UA 646 ,D43 1974b)

Gething, Michael J. NATO Air Power Today. London: Arms andArmour Press, 1986. (UGH 4127 .039 1986)

Gray, Colin S. 'Who's Afraid of the Cruise Missile?' Orbis. 21.3 (Fall 1977): 517-531.

Griffith, William E. 'Superpower Problems in Europe: AComparative Assessment.' Orbls. 29 .4 (Winter 1986): 735-752.

Hahn, Walter F. 'NATO's Quiet Crisis.' Strategic Review. 5 .3(Summer 1977) : 26-39.

6

Hanigan. E. J. A Reappraisal of Our NATO Nuclear Policy.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College. Air University,1964. (UA 646.3 H23)

Hendrickson, David C. "NATO Defense: No Need for Basic Change.Parameters. 17 (Summer 1987): 76-85.

Holmes. Kim R. 'Measuring the Conventional Balance in Europe.International Security. 12 .166-173 (Spring 1988)-

Hughes. 0. Philip. *Cutting the Gordian Knot: A Theater-Nuclear Force for Deterrence in Europe.' Orbis. 22 .2(Summer 1978): 309-332.

Huth, Paul and Bruce Russett. 'What Makes Deterrence Work'Cases from 1900 to 1980.' World Politics. 36 .4 (July1984): 496-526.

Institute for Strategic Studies. The Soviet Union and the NATOPowers: The Military Balance. London: Institute forStrategic Studies. 1959. (UA 646 L84 1959)

Isby, David C., and Charles Ramps. Jr. Armies of NATO's CentralFront. London: Jane's. 1985 (UA 646 3 173 1985)

Jackson, Robert. NATO Air Power. Novato. CA: Presidio Press.1987. (Oversize UGH 131 .J13 1987)

Jarvis, Geoffrey H. To Reduce Forces in Europe But Retain theBalance-That is the Problem. Maxwell Air Force Base. AL: AirWar College, Air University. 1973. (UGB 907 .A42 4959)

Johnstone, Diana. The Politics of Euromissiles: Europe's Role inAmerica's World. London: Schocken Books, 1984. fUA 646.3IJ57 1984)

Johnston, Means Jr. 'The Southern Flank of NATO' Problems of theSouthern Region in the Post-1973 October War Period.'Military Review. 56 (Apr. 1976): 22-29.

Jones, Christopher. *Equality and Equal Security in Europe.Orbis. 28 .3 (Fall 1082): 637-664

Kaltefleiter, Werner. 'German Divisions.' Policy Review. 18(Fall 1981): 41-49.

Kirk, Grayson and Nils Wessell. eds. The Soviet Threat: Mythsand Realities. New York: Praeger. 1978 (E 183.8 .R9 S741978b)

7

Komer, Robert W. *A Credible Conventional Option: Can NATO

Afford rtl (Nonnuclear Capability for 'Outlasting' aConventioanl Warsaw Pact Attack).' Strategic Review. 12(Spring l,84): 33-8.

Lawrence. Richard D. U.S. Force Structure in NATO: An

Alternative; A Staff Paper. Washington. D.C.: Brookingsinstitution. 1974. (UA 646.5 US L38)

Mako, William P. U.S. Ground Forces and the Defense of CentralEurope. Washington. D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1983. (UA

646.3 .M243 1983)

Martin. Laurence W. NATO and the Defense of the West : AnAnalysis of America's First Line of Defense. New York: Holt.Rinehart, and Winston, 1985. (UA -646.3 M26 1985)

Mason, George A. NATO's Nuclear Need - Multilateral Force orAtlantic Nuclear Force. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air WarCollege. Air University, 1965. [UA 646.3 .M39)

McCarthy, Robert F A European Nuclear Identity Within NATO.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University,1972. (UGB 907 .A42 4646)

McKitrick, Myra Struck. *A Conventional Deterrent for NATO: AnAlternative to the Nuclear Balance of Terror.' Parameters.13 (Mar. 1983): 51-8.

McNaughen. Thomas L. *Arms and Allies on the Arabian Peninsula.'Orbis 28 .3 (Fall 1984)- 489-526

Mearsheimer, John J. -Numbers. Strategy, and the MilitaryBalance.' International Security. 12 (Spring 1Q88): 174-

185.

Menaul, Stewart W. B. 'The Military Balance and ItsImplications: A European View. Strategic Review. 5 .3

(Summer 1977): 47-59.

Meredith, David S. The Bundeswehr in NATO: a Changing Role°

Carlisle Barracks, PA: U.S. Army War College, 1971. (UA646.5 .04 M4)

The Military Balance. London: Institute for Strategic Studies,1964-. (UA 646 L84 Annual)

Morgenthau, Hans J. 'Alliances and the Balance of Power.'Perspectives in Defense Management. fJan. 3Q71)' 11-19.

8

NATO and the Warsaw Pact: Force Comparisons. 1979. (UA 646.N67)

NATO and the Warsaw Pact: Force Comparisons. Brussels: NATOInformation Service, 1984. (Gov Docs S 1.2:N 81/984)

NATO Military Command & Organization Charts. Paris: 1965.(Oversize UA 646.3 N86c)

New Conventional Weapons and East-West Security. London:International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1978. (U162.A23 no.145)

Papworth, Peter M. The Integrity of the Warsaw Pact. MaxwellAir Force Base, AL: Air University. 1976. (UGB 907 .A426023)

Payne, Keith B. and Marc J. Berkowitz. "Anti-tactical MissileDefense, Allied Security and the INF Treaty.' StrategicReview. 16 (Winter 1988): 24-34.

Pelezynski, John J. NATO Multilateral Nuclear Force or What9Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, Air University.1965. (UA 646.3 P39)

Petraeus, David H. 'Light Infantry in Europe: StrategicFlexibility and Conventional Deterrence." Military Review.64 (Dec. 1984): 35-55.

Pierre, Andrew J., and William 0. Hyland, eds. Nuclear Weaponsin Europe. New York: Council on Foreign Relations. 1984.(UA 646 .N79 1984)

Posen, Barry R. "Is NATO Decisively Outnumbered9" International

Security. 12 (Spring 1988): 186-202.

Price, Alfred. Air Battle Central Europe. New York: Free Press.1986. (UGH 131 .P94 1987)

Prina, L. Edgar. 'A New Look at NATO." Military Review. 57 7(July 1977): 25-33.

Rogers, Bernard W. "Western Security and European Defence.'RUSI Journal for Defence Studies. 131 (Sept. i986): 11-14.

Rose, Francois de. "NATO and Nuclear Weapons." StrategicReview. 15 (Fall 1987): 27-35.

Ruhle, Hans. "Cruise Missiles. NATO and the "European Option"Strategic Review. 6 (Fall 1978): 46-52.

9

Sadykiewicz, M. Organizing for Coalition Warfare. The Role ofEast European Warsaw Pact Forces in Soviet Military Planning.Santa Monica, CA.: Rand Corp., 1988. (RAND R-3559-RC)

Sadykiewicz, M. Soviet-Warsaw Pact Western Theater of MilitaryOperations: Organization and Missions. Santa Monica. CA.:Rand Corp., 1987. (RAND N-25Q6-AF)

Sadykiewicz, M. The Warsaw Pact Command Structure in Peace andWar. Santa Monica, CA.: Rand Corp., 1988. (RAND R-3558-RC)

Scalapino, Robert A. 'The Sino-Sovlet Relationship: Reflectionson Its Past and Future.' Strategic Review. 5 .4 (Fall1977): 45-63.

Schwartz, David N. 'The Role of Deterrence in NATO DefenseStrategy: Implications for Doctrine and Posture." WorldPolitics. 28 .1 (Oct. 1Q75): 118-133.

Scott, Bruce K. *A NATO Nonnuclear Deterrence: Is it Affordable'Serious Consideration is Being Given to the Possiblity ofConverting NATO's Traditional Nuclear-Conventional Deterrenceto a Conventional Force Alone.' Military Review. 64 (Sept.1984): 56-69.

Shaw, Robbie. NATO Aircraft in Colour. London: Jane's, 1986.(UGH 4127 .953 1Q86)

Shilling, David M. 'Europe's Conventional Defence: SolidProgress but Challenges Remain.' Survival. 30 (Mar-/Apr.

1988): 122-133.

Shishko, R. The European Conventional Balance: A Primer. SantaMonica, CA.: Rand Corp., 1981. (RAND P-6707)

Sigal, Leon V. Nuclear Forces in Europe : Enduring Dilemmas.Present Prospects. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.1984. (UA 646.3 .S536 1984)

Simon. Jeffrey ed. NATO-Warsaw Pact Force Mobilization.Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press, 1988.(Gov Does D 5.402.M 71/6)

Slessor, John Cotesworth Command and Control of Allied NuclearForces : A British View. London: Institute of StrategicStudies. 1965. (U 162 .A23 no.22)

Sorrels, Charles A. Soviet Propaganda Campaign Against NATO.U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Washington: GPO,1983. (Gov Docs AC 1.2: So 8)

10

Spencer. David E. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization and theStaborne Multilateral Nuclear Force. Maxwell Air Force Base,AL: Air War College, Air University, 1985. (UA 646-3 .S74)

Stevens, Phil. 'NATO and the Warsaw Pact: An Assessment.*Military Review. 58 (Sept. 1978): 34-42.

Strelecki. Joseph L. The NATO Multilateral Force: Born a Loser:A Case Study. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College.Air University, 1087. (UA 646.3 .S91)

Syrett, David. 'An Inconsequent Debate: Blitzkrieg, P0Ms andCentral Europe.' Military Review. 57 .7 (July 1977) : 12-15.

Taylor, Peter P. W. NATO's Dispersal Capability: A Fatal FlawMaxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air University. 1977. (UGB 907.A43 240)

U. S. Congress. Congressional Budget Office. Assessing the NATO/Warsaw Pact Military Balance. Washington: GPO, 1977. (GOYDoes Y 1O.12:M 591

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. NATOTroop Withdrawals. Hearings. 97th Cong., 2nd &es.Washington: GPO. 1982. (Gov Does Y 4 .F 76/2: N 81a/13)

U. S. Congress. Congressional Budget Office. U. S. Ground Forcesand the Conventional Balance in Europe. Washington: GPO,1988. (Gov Docs Y 1O.2:0 91/2)

U. S. Dept. of State. Bureau of Public Affairs. Atlas of NATO.Washington: GPO, 1985. (Goy Does 5 1.33/2: N 81)

Ullman, Richard H. 'Out of the Euromissile Mire.* ForeignPolicy. 50 (Spring 1983): 39-52.

Vigeveno, Guido. The Bomb and Eurovean Security. Bloomington:Indiana University Press, 1983. (UA 646 V5 1983)

Volgyer, Ivan. 'Regional Differences Within the Warsaw Pact.'Orbis. 26 .3 (Fall 1982): 665-679.

Wall, Patrick. "NATO: Both Sides Have Their Troubles.' SeaPower (almanac of Sea Power). 26 .5 (15 Apr. 1983): 53-55.

Wall, Patrick. 'A Net Naval Assessment (Strengths and Weaknessesof NATO and the Warsaw Pact).' Sea Power. 27 (Oct. 1984):6-12.

11

Willsie, Richard E. A New Threat to the Air Organization ofNATO's Southeastern Flank. the Sixth Allied Tactical AirForce. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air War College, AirUniversity, 1969. (UGB 907 .A42 3850)

Wilson, Pete. "Missile Defense for NATO: We Must Respond to theChallenge.' Strategic Review. 14 (Spring 1986): 9-15.

Wolf, Joseph J., ed. Strengthening Deterrence : NATO and theCredibility of Western Defense in the 1980e : the AtlanticCouncil's Working oroup on the Credibility of the NATODeterrent. Cambridge. MA: Ballinger Pub. Co, 1982. (UA646.3 .C73)

Worner, Manfred. 'A Missile Defense for NATO Europe.* StrategicReview. 14 (Winter 1986): 13-20.

Worner. Manfred. 'NATO Defenses and Tactical Nuclear Weapons.'Strategic Review. 5 .4 (Fall 1977): 11-18.

Zais, Melvin. *NATO's Southeastern Flank.' Strategic Review. 5.2 (Spring 1977): 45-51.

Zinner, Paul E. East-West Relations in Europe : Observations andAdvice from the Sidelines, 1971-1982. Boulder. CO: WestviewPress, 1984. (D 1058 .Z54 1984)

12

111. COOPERATION AND CONFLICT IN THE ALLIANCE

Alinm. George R. *Spain's NATO Dilemma (Concerning its Rol* inthe Alliance).' Military Review. 85 (Jan.1985): 81-73.

Alting von Geusau. Frans A. N., * d. Allies in a Turbulent World:Challenges to UI.S. and Western Furooean Co~operation.

Lexington. MA: Lexington Books, 1982. (0 1085 -U5 A78 1982)

Andelman, David A. 'Helminki's Child: The Road to Madrid.*Foreign Policy. 39 (Summer 1980): 159-172.

Art. Robert J. 'Fixing Atlantic Bridges.' Foreign Policy. 46(Spring 1982) : 87-85.

Ausland, John C. Nordic Security and the Great Powers. Boulder,CO: Westview Press, 1988. (UA 848.7 .AQ7 1988)

Baldauf. J3. How PIg is the Tbreat to Europe: TransatlanticDebates Over the BalAnce of Forces. Santa Monica, CA.: RandCorp.,. 1987. (RAND P-7372)

Bare. C. Gordon. *Burden-Sharing in NATO: The Economics ofAlliance.* Orbis. 20 .2 (Summer 1978): 417-438.

Bathurst, Maurice Edward. Germany and the North AtlanticCommunity: & Legal Sgrvey. London: Stevens. 1958. (DO 259.4.B33)

Bergaten, C. Fred. 'New Urgency for International MonetaryReform.' Foreian Pollcy. 19 (Summer 1975): 79-93.

Bohn, David E. 'Neutrality - Switzerland's Policy Dilem~ma:Options in the New Europe.' Orbia. 21 .2 (Summer. 1977):335-352.

Boll, Michael M. "Turkey's New National Security Concept: WhatIt Means for NATO.' Orbis. 23 .3 (Fall 1979): 809-831.

Bolton, David. 'European Defence-- The Challenge to NATO.' RUSIJournal for Defence Studies. 120 (Sept. 1975): 38-43.

Buchan, Alastair et al.,* eds. The Atlantic Papers: Political andStrategic Studies. New York: _The Dunellen Co., 1970. (D839.2 P78)

Bundy, William P. 'Alliance Crisis and Consensus: WesternExperience.' Naval War College Review. 37 (Nov./Dec. 1984):37-57.

13

Burch. Geoffrey. EupenMilitary Collaboration.* RUSIJournal for Defence Studies. 117 (Dec. 1072): 9-14.

Callaghan, Thomas A. U.S./Eurooan Economic Cooperation inMilitary and Civil Technoloty. Washington , DC -Center forStrategic and International Studies, Georgetown University,1978. (VA 8.3 .03:3 1978)

Canada's Role in the North Atlantic Treaty.' Military Review.30 .11 (Feb. 1951): 79-84.

Canby, Steven L.. and Jean Edward Smith. 'Canada's Role In NATMthe Laggard Who Can Rescue the Alliance.' Strategic Review.13 (Summer '85): 47-59.

Carlton, David. Great Britain and NATO AParting of the Wave?London: Institute for European Defence & Strategic Studies,1982. (VA 848.5 .07 C3 1982)

Chassin, L. M. "Philosophy of Coalitions.* Military Review. 39(Aug. 1959): 101-109.

Churba, Joseph. 'The Eroding Security Balanee in the MiddleEast.' Orbis. 24 .2 (Summer 1980): 353-362.

Clarke. John L. *NATO Standardization: Panacea or Plague?'Military Review. 59 (Apr 1979): 59-85.

Collins, john Mi. U.S. Military Support for NATO. Washington:Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service. 1973.(VA 86.5 U5 C8)

Cordier, Sherwood S. "The Atlantic Alliance-- Problems andProspects.' U. S. Naval Institute Proceedings. 92 (Dec.1966) : 38-49.

Cornell, Alexander H. international Collaboration in Weapons andEguipment Development and Production kx the NATO Allies !TonYears Later--and Beyond. Boston: N. NiJhoff, 1961. (MA848.3 .C67 1981)

Cottrell, Alvin J.,* and Stanley L. Harrison. 'Alliances: TheTies that Bind.' U. S. N!aval Institute Proceedings. 94(Sept. 1968): 26-35,

Coulourdbis, Theodore A. Greek Political Reactions to Americanand NATO Influences. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press,1986. (DF 787 .U5 C6)

14

Craig, Gordon Alexander. NATO and the New German Army.Princeton: Center of International Studies, PrincetonUniversity, 1955. (UA 646.5 .03 C88)

Dankert, Pieter. *Europe Together. America Apart.' ForignPolicy. 53 (Winter 1283): 18-33.

Degner, Juergen. 'The Security Policy of the Federal Republic ofGermany." Paramete*rs. 15 (Summer 1985): 47-54.

Deibel, Terry L. "Guide to International Divorce.' ForeignPolicy. 30 (Spring 1978): 17-35.

Domke, William K., Richard C. Eichenberg. and Catherine M.Kelleher. 'Consensus Lost' Domestic Politics and the"Crisis' in NATO.* World Politics. 39 .3 (April 1987):382-407.

Don, B. W. Allie. and Adversaries: Policy Insights intoStrategic Defense Relationships. Santa Monica, Ca.: RandCorp., 1986. (RAND P-7242-RGS)

Dwan, John E. 'Scandinavia and the Future of NATO.' MilitaryReview. 48 (Apr. 1968): 54-62.

Eatman, Robert W. NATO and Spain: Who Needs Whom? Maxwell AirForce Base, AL: Air Univernity. 1978. (UGB 907 .A43 328)

Elland, Michael D. 'The Two-Way Street in NATO Procurement.'Strategic Review. 5 .3 (Summer 1977): 60-70.

Facer, Roger. The Alliance and Europe: Part III, Weapon,Procurement in Europe - Capabilities and Choices. London:International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1974. (U162.A23 no.108)

Farrell, Henry R. 'Viewpoints on Europe: Challenge of aCoalition in Peace and War.* Mllltary Review. 66 (June1986): 57-83.

Fast, Richard Charles. The Politics of Weapons Standardizationin NATO. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California atSanta Barbara, 1981. (SpColl LB 2379 .F25 1981)

Fedder, Edwin H., ed. NATO in the Seventies. St. Louis: Centerfor International Studies, University of Missouri, 1970. (UA646.3 .N243)

15

Flanagan, Stephen J. -Emerging Tensions over NATO's ConventionalForcea." International Defense Review. 20 .1 (1987)- 31-34.

Flynn. Gregory ed. NATO's Northern Allies : the NationalSecurity Policies of Belgium. Denmark, the Netherlands, andNorway. Totowa, N.J: Rowman & Allanheld, 1985. ellA 646.85.N37 1985)

Flynn, Gregory and Hans Rattinger. eds. The Public and AtlanticDetente. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanhel1d, 19-85. (UA 646.3P78 1985)

Fortson, Thomas E. Seabornt Multilateral Force: Mixed Manning.Maxwell Air Force -Base, ALt Air War Colle*ge. Air University,1971. (UGB 907 .A42 4336)

Fowles, John S. 'Britain's Defense Forces: the 1977 DefenseWhite Paper, With Comments (Maintenance of Contribution tothe North Atlan~tic Treaty Organization).' Military Review.57 (Sept. 1977): 16-20.

Freedman, Lawrence ed. The Troubled Alliance: Atlantic Relationsin the 1980's. New Vork: -St.Maltin'a Pretss. 1983. (CA646.3 .T76 1983)

Gellner. John. Canada in NATO. Toronto: Ryerson Press. 1970.(UA 646.5 .C2 031)

Godson, Joseph. "Is NATO Still Necessary?' Military Review. 57.3 (March 1977): 22-27.

Goldstein, Walter ed. Clash in the North : Polar Summitry andNATO's Northern Flank. Wasxhington: Pergamon-Brasy'sInternational Defense Publishers, 1988. (UA 646.3 .C53 1988)

Griffith. William E. *Bonn and Washington: From Deteriorationto Crisis.' Orbis. 26 .1 (Spring 1982): 117-133.

Grondal, Benedikt. Iceland, Prom Neutrality to NATO Membership.Oslo: UnlversIteteforlaget. 1971. (DL 375 .076)

Haase, Richard N. 'Managing NATO's Weakest Flank: The UnitedStates, Greece, and Turkey.' Orbis. 30 .3 (Fall 1986):457-473.

Hagen, Lawrence S. , ed. The Crisis in Western Security. NY: St.Martin's Press, 1982. (UA 646.3 .C4 1982)

16

Hahn, Walter F. Between Westpolitik and Ostpolitik : ChangingWest German Securit Views. Beverly Hills, CA: SagePublications, 1975. (UA 710 .H27)

Hamm, Manfred h. "Strategic Defense and the West German SocialDemocrats.* Strategic Review. 14 (Spring '86): 16-26.

Hamm, Manfred R., and Bruce W. Weinrod. 'The TransatlanticPolitics of Strategic Defense.' Orbis. 29 .4 (Winter1986)- 709-734.

Han. Sungjoo. 'South Korea's Participation in the VietnamConflict: An Analysis of the U.S.-Korean Alliance.' Orbis.21 .4 (Winter 1978): 893-912.

Harrison, Michael M. 'Reagan's World.' Foreign Policy. 43(Summer 1981): 3-16.

Harrison. Michael M. The Reluctant Ally : France and AtlanticSecurity. Baltimore. MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.1981. (DC 404 .H35)

Harrison. Stanley Leroy. Aspects of the NATO Alliance. McLean.VA: Research Analysis Corp.. 1970. (D 845.2 .H32)

Harrison, Stanley L. 'Europe. the United States, and NATO."Military Review. 50 (June 1970): 43-54.

Hartley, Keith. NATO Arms Co-operation : A Study in Economicsand Politics. London: Allen & Unwin. 1983. (UA 646.3 .H261983)

Hassner, Pierre. 'The Shifting Foundation.* Foreign Policy. 48(Fall 1982): 3-20.

Havard, G. B. *The Role of Belgium in NATO.* Military Review.51 (July 1971): 17-22.

Heiberg, William L. The Sixteenth Nation: Spain's Role in NATO.Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press, 1983.(Gov Docs D 5.409:83-1)

Heyhoe, David C. R. The Alliance and Europe. Part VI: TheEuropean Programme Group. London: International Institutefor Strategic Studies, 1977. (U 1862 .A23 no.129)

Hinterhoff, Eugene. 'Spain and NATO.' Military Review. 51(Mar. 1971): 39-44.

17

Hoffmann, Stanley. 'Gaullism by Any Other Name.' ForeignPolicy. 57 (Winter 1984/85)- 38-57.

Holmes, John W. *The Dumbbell Won't Do.' Foreign Policy. 50(Spring 1983): 3-22.

Hoist, Johan J.. Kenneth Hunt and Anders C. Sjaastad. *do.Deterrence and Defense in the North. Oslo: NorwegianUniversity Press, 1985. (UA 646.85 .D48 1985)

Hughes, Thomas L. 'Up From Reaganism." Foreign Policy. 44(Fall 1981): 3-23.

Hunt, Kenneth. "Crisis and Consensus in the West-- theBoundaries of Shared Interests.' Naval War College Review.37 (Nov./Dec. 1984): 58-70.

Hunter, Robert E. 'Will the United States Remain a EuropeanPower?" Survival. 30 (May/June 1988): 210-231.

Joffe, Josef. *Europe's American Pacifier." Foreign Policy. 54(Spring 1984): 64-82.

Kaldor. Mary and Richard Falk, eds. Dealignment : A New ForeignPolicy Perspective. New York: Basil Blackwell, 1987. (JX1393.N54 D42 1987)

Kaplan, Lawrence S. 'NATO and the Nixon Doctrine: Ten YearsLater.' Orbis. 24 .1 (Spring 1980): 149-164.

Kennedy, Gavin. Burden Sharing in NATO. New York: Holmes &Meier Publishers, 1979. (UA 646.3 .X39 1979)

Knorr, Klaus. 'Burden-Sharing in NATO: Aspects of US Policy.'Orbis. 29 .3 (Fall 1985): 517-536.

Kohl, Helmut. 'The Future of the Alliance and German-AmericanRelations.' Harvard International Review. 9 (Nov-Dec.1986): 10-12.

Komorowski, R. A. 'Spain and the Defense of NATO.' U. S. NavalInstitute Proceedings. 102 (May 1976): 190-203.

Kuniholm, Bruce R. 'Turkey and NATO: Past. Present, andFuture.' Orbis. 27 .2 (Summer 1983): 421-445.

Kuzmanic-Svete, Nila. 'The USA and Its NATO Allies.' Review ofInternational Affairs. 27 (5 April 1978): 29-31.

18

Larrabee, F. Stephen. 'Dateline Athens: Greece for the Greekg."Foreign Policy. 45 (Winter 1981/82): 158-174.

Latour, Charles. *South Africa: NATO's Unwelcome Ally.'MilAtary Review. 57 (Feb. 1977): 84-93.

Lipson, Charles. *International Cooperation in Economic andSecurity Affairs." World Politics. 37 .1 (October 1984):1-23.

Lochen, Einar. Norway in Euroean and Atlantic Co-operation.0slo: Universiteteforlaget, 1964. (UA 646.5 .N6 L81)

MacMillan, N. 'The British Commonwealth Relation to NATO andSHAPE.' Interavia. 7 .8 (1952): 425-427.

Malone, Daniel K. ROLAND: & Case fo or AAAInst NATOStandardization. Washington, D.C.: National DefenseUniversity Press, 1980. (Gov Docs D 5.409:80-5)

Manwaring. Max G. et al. 'Iberia's Role in NATO's Future:Strategic Reserve, Reinforcement and Redoubt.' Parameters.16 (Spring 1988): 43-54.

Marshall, Rick. *Turkey: NATO's Bridge and Bulwark.' Defenseand Foreign Affairs. 14 (June 1986): 28-28-.

McAdam, Richard C. A Multilateral Nuclear Force for NATO.Maxwell Air Force Base, AL Air War College, Air University.1984. (UA 648.3 MIl)

McCarthy, Eugene J. *Look, No Allies." Foreign Policy. 30(Spring 1978): 3-18.

Moore, John E. 'NATO: At 35, Again Suffering from GrowingPains." Sea Power. 27 .(Special Edition) (15 Apr. 1984):8-70.

Mujal-Leon, Eusebio. "Rel(g~ning in Spain.' Foreign Policy. 51(Summer 1983): 101-117.

Newman, Anthony T. Britain's Contribution to NATO: A Newperspective. Maxwell Air Force Base. AL: Air War College,Air University, 1972. (UGB 907 .A42 4888)

O'Ballanee, Edgar. *NATO and the Enemy Within.' RUSI Journalfor Defence Studies. 130 (June 1985): 45-49.

Olson, Eric T. 'NATO Burden Sharing: A New Look Needed.'Military Review. 83 (Nov. 1983): 12-20.

19

Orvik, Vile. "A Defense Doctrine for Canada.' Orbis. 27 .1

(Spring 1983)! 185-206.

Orvik, Mile and Niels J. Hagerup. The Scandinavian Members of

NATO. London: Institute for Strategic Studies, 1985. (U 162

.A23 no.23)

Price. Jeremy S. B. Democratic Spain - An Asset NATO CannotIgnore. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air University. Air WarCollege, 1978. (UGB 907 .A43 450)

Record, Jeffrey, U.S. Nuclear Weapons in Europe ! Iues andAlternatives. Washington. D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1974.(UA 848.5 US R42)

Roberts, Frank. 'The Relevance of NATO to the True Needs of the

North Atlantic Alliance.' RUSI Journal of Defence Studies.122 (Sept. 1977): 11-18.

Rome, Francois do. European Security and France. Urbana:

University of Illinois Press, 1984. (UA 700 .R68713 1984)

Rowen. Henry S. 'Japan and the Future Balance in Asia.' Orbis.

21 .2 (Summer 1977): 191-210.

Rubinstein, Alvin Z. 'Israel in NATO: Basis for a Middle East

Settlement." Orbis. 22 .1 (Spring 1978): 89-100.

Rudney. Robert S. 'Mitterrand's New Atlanticism: Evolving

French Attitudes Toward NATO.' Orbis. 28 .1 (Spring 1984):83-101.

Sabrosky, Alan Ned. 'America in NATO: The Conventional

Delusion.' Orbis. 25 .2 (Summer 1981): 293-308.

Schmitz, Peter N. Defending the NATO Alliance: Global

Implications. Washington. D.C.: National Defense UniversityPress. 1087. (Gov Docs D 5.402:9 81/2)

Semialignment and Western Security. New York: St. Martin's

Press, 1088. (UA 848.3 .9434 1988)

Sheffer, 0. 'Independence in Dependence of Regional Powers:The Uncomfortable Alliances in the Middle East Before and

After the October 1973 War.' Orbis. 19 .4 (Winter 1978):1519-1538.

Siracusa, Joseph M. *Australian-American Relations, 1080: AHistorical Perspective," Orbis. 24 .2 (Summer 1980): 271-288.

20

Sokolsky, Joel J. NT:Taking Canada More Seriously.* RSIIJou~rnal for Defence Stiosi. 127 (Dec. 1982): 41-47.

Stein, D. J. The Development of NATO Tactical Ai Doctrine,1970-1985. Santa Monica, CA.! Rand Corp. , 1987. (RAND R-3385)

Steinberg, James B. 'Rethinking the Debate on Burden-gharing.'Survival. 29 (Jan./Feb. 1987): 56-78.

Steinke, Rudolf and Michel Vale, *do. Germany Debates DefensetThe NATO Alliancej &_ tjh Crossroads. Armonk, NY: Publishedin collaboration with the Committee for a Nuclear-Free Europe(by] U.K. Sharp*. 1983. (UA 710 .04613 1983)

Stern, Jonathan P. *Specters and Pipe Dreams.' Foreign Policy.48 (Fall 1982): 21-36.

Stethent, Nicholas. *Canada's Crisis: The Dangers." ForeignPolicy. 29 (Winter 1977/78): 56-64.

Strausz-Hupe. Robert. *Reflections on the Quarter: The NorthAtlantic Comitment.* Orbic. 22 .1 (Spring 1978): 3-10.

Strauzz-Hupt. Robert. 'Will Went Germany Stay in Stop?" PolicyReview. 11 (Winter 1980)! 37-49.

Sullivan. Leonard Jr. 'A New Approach to Burden Sharing.'Foeisuja Policy. 60 (Fall 1985) : 91-110.

Tahir-Khtli. Shirin. *Proxies and Alliesi The Came of Iran andPakixtan.* Qrbi. 24 .2 (Summer 1980): 339-352.

Taylor, Trevor. Defence. Tachnoloty, an InternationalIntegiration. Now York:, St. Martin's Press. 1982. (IYC 2807T39 1982)

Teammer. Arnold Lee. Politics of Compromise: NATO &D WAjWashington, D.C.! National Defense University Proen 1988.(Gov Doom D 5.402:N 81/3)

The Transatlantic Crisis : A Conference o.f the Committee for theEM~* World. New York! Orwell Proms, 1982. (D 1065 U5 T7)

Traverton. Gregory F. The Dollar Drain and American Forces inGemay ftnasing the* Political Economics of Alliance.Athens: Ohio University Proms, 1978. (E 183.8 .03 T71)

21

Tsufis, Bill P. Reduction oLf Ln-Place NATO-Assigned IM Forces.Maxwell Air Force Bae, AL: Air War College, Air University,1070. (UGE 007 A42 4485)

Taurutani, Taketsugu. 'Japan's Security, DefenseResponsibilities and Capabilities.' Orbim. 25 .1 (January1981): 80-106.

Tucker, Robert W. , Linda Wrigley, and Theodore Draper, eds. TheAtlantic Alliance and Its Critics. New York: Praeger, 183.(JX 1303 .N87 A74 1083)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Th. AmericanCommitment to NATO. Report of the Special Subcommittee onNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization Commitments. 02nd Cong..2nd sees. Washington: GPO, 1072. (Gov Does Y 4. Ar 5/2a!071-72/84)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs.Challenges to NATO'. Consensus: West European Attitudes andIL. S. Policy. 100th Cong. , 1st mean. Washington: GPO, 1087.(Gov Docs Y 4.F 78/1:N 81/14)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. DefenceManpower Policies and Problems amn Member Countries ofNATO. Hearings. 07th Cong. lct sees. Washington: OPO.1081. (Gov Docs Y 4 .Ar 5/2a: 081-82/25)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Departmentof Defense Appropriations for 1070. Pat L North AtlanticTreaty Organization. ... Hearings. 05th Cong., 2nd son..Washington: GPO, 1078. (Gov Does Y 4 .Ap 6/1: D 38/5/979/pt. 4)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services.International Security Issues. Hearing. 08th Cong., lstsees. Washington: GPO, 1083. (Gov Does Y 4.Ar 5/3!S.hrg.98-401)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. TheModernization of NATOcs Long-Range Theater Nuclear Force.Committee Print. 08th Cong. , 2nd seas. Washington: GPO.1080. (Gov Docc Y 4.F 76/1:N 81/10)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. NATO - AStatus Report. Committee Print. 96th Cong. , 2nd sass.Washington: GPO, 1080. (Gov Does Y 4 .F 76/2: N 81a/10)

22

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. NATOAfter Afganistan. Committee Print. 96th Cong., 2nd seas.Washington: GPO, 1980. (Gov Docs Y 4.F 76/1:,V 81/8)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. NATO andWestern Security in the 1980's: The Euroean Perception.Committee Print. 96th Cong., 2nd seas. Washington: GPO,1980. (Gov Docs Y 4.F 76/1:N 61/7)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. NATOMutual Support Act of 1979. Hearings. 96th Cong.. let sees.Washington: GPO, 1979. (Gov Does Y 4.F 76.1:N 81/5)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on International Relations.NATO Standardization: Political. Economic, and MilitaryIssues for Congress. Committee Print. 95th Cong., lst sess.Washington: GPO, 1977. (Gov Does Y 4 In 8/16: N 81/3)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. NATOStandardization, Interoperabilitv and Readiness. Hearings.95th Cong., 2nd sees. Washington: UPO, 1978. (Gov Docs Y 4.Ar 5/2a: 977-78/72)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. NATOSubcommittee 1980 Trio Report. Commitee Print. 96th Cong.,2nd sees. Washington: GPO, 1981. (Gov Doces Y 4 .Ar 5/2: N81sa/2)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. NATOToday: The Alliance in Evolution. Senate Doc 97-31. 97thCong.. 2nd sess. Washington: GPO. 1982. (Gov Docs Y 1.1/2:13440)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. NATO: A Timefor Renewed Commitment. Committee Print. 98th Cong.., 2ndsees. Washington: GPO, 1984. (Gov Docs Y 4 .Ar 5/2: N 81a/4)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. NorthAtlantic Treaty Organization Mutual Support Act of 1979.House Report 612, Part 1,2. 96th Cong., 1st sees.Washington: GPO, 1979. (Gov Does Y 1.1/2:133303)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. NorthAtlantic Treaty Organization--An Alliance of Shared Values.Committee Print. 97th Cong., 2nd seas. Washington: GPO,1982. (Gov Doos Y 4 .Ar 5/2: N 81a/3)

23

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations.Perspectives on NATO's Southern Flank. Committee Print.96th Cong.. 2nd seas. Washington: GPO, 1980. (Gov Does Y 4.F 76/2: N 81a/9)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations.Problems in the Standardization and Interopsrability of NATOMilitary Eouipment. Part 1, 2. Hearings. 05th Cong., letsees. Washington: GPO, 1977. (Gov Does Y 4 .G 74/7:N 81/pt.1,2)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Armed Services. Report ofthe Defense Burdensharing Panel. Committee Print. 100thCong., 2nd sees. Washington: GPO, 1g88. (Gov Does Y 4 Ar5/2:D 36/17)

U. S. Congress. House. Intercollegiate Debate Topic 1987-1988.Resolved that the United States Should Reduce Significantlyits Military Commitments to NATO Member States. House Doe100-98. 100th Cong.,lst sees. Washington: GPO, 1987. (GovDoes Y 1.1/7:100-98)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. The Roleof the North Atlantic Assembly. Committee Print. 96thCong., let sees. Washington: GPO, 1979. (Gov Docs Y 4 .F76/2: N 81a/8)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Turkey,Greece, and NATO: The Strained Alliance. Committee Print.96th Cong., 2nd sesa. Washington: GPO, 1980. (Gov Doe Y 4.F 76/2:T 84)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. U. S.Forces in NATO. Hearings. 93rd Cong., 1st seas.Washington: GPO, 1973. (Gov Does Y 4.F 76/1:N 81/4)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. U. S.Military Installations in NATOs Southern Region. CommitteePrint. 99th Cong. 2nd seas. Washington: GPO. 1986. (GovDoes Y 4 .F 78/1:M 59/10)

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. Western

Security Issues: European Perspectives. Hearings. 96th

Cong.. lst sess. Washington: GPO, 1979. (Gov Docs Y 4 .F78/1: W 52/2)

24

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Twenty-Fifth Meeting of the North Atlantic Assembly Held at Ottawa.Canada Oct 22 to Oct. 27. 1979. Report of the U. S.Delegation. Committee Print. 96th Cong.. 2nd Bess.Washington: GPO, 1980. (Gov Docs Y 4 .F 76/2: N 81a/5/980)

Vardamis, Alex A. "German-American Military Fissures.' ForeignPolicy. 34 (Spring 1979): 87-106.

Volgyes. Ivan. 'Troubled Friendship or Mutual Dependence?Eastern Europe and the USSR in the Gorbachev Era.' Orbis.30 .2 (Summer 1986): 343-353.

Wahner, Roselyn R. The Stationing of United States Troops inEurope: a Background Study. Washington: Library of Congress,Legislative Reference Service. 1967. (UA 646.5 US W3)

Wall, Patrick. 'Advice to the Alliance-- How to StrengthenNATO's Unity and Effectiveness." Sea Power. 28 (Apr. 1985):108-112+.

Wall. Patrick. 'NATO Must Standardize.' Military Review. 56

(Dec. 1976): 58-63.

Wall, Patrick. *Unfinished Business-- a British Statesman's Viewon Problems Facing the Grand Alliance." Sea Power. 28 (Feb-1985): 21-26.

Weiss, Seymour and Kenneth Adelman. 'A Critical Phase in Trans-

Atlantic Relations.* Strategic Review. 9 (Spring 1981): 24-34.

Wells, Samuel F., Jr. 'The Mitterand Challenge.' ForeignPolicy. 44 (Fall 1981): 57-69.

Williams. Phil. The Senate and US troops in Europe. New York:St. Martin's Press, i985. (UA 646.5 US W55 1985)

Williams, Thomas 8. A Multilateral Force for NATO. Maxwell AirForce Base. AL: Air War College, Air University. 1965. (UA646.3 .W72)

Windsor. Philip. Germany and the Western Alliance : Lessons fromthe 1980 Crises. London: International Institute forStrategic Studies, 1981. tU 162 .A23 no. 170)

Worner. Manfred, 'The 'Peace Movement' and NATO: An AlternativeView from Bonn.' Strategic Review. 10 (Winter 1982): 15-21.

25

Zakheim. Dov S 'Improving NATO Defenses: The InstitutionalDimension (Focuses on Political and Institutional QuestionsThat Relate to Further Attempts at *Rationalization,'Specifically on Those Questions That Affect the Framework ofIntra-European Cooperation Among NATO Allies). MilitaryReview. 57 (Oct. 1977): 43-55.

26

IV. NATO STRATEGY

Ammo, Carl H. NATO Strategy and Nuclear Defense. New York:Greenwood Press, 1988. (UA 646.3 ,A74 1988)

Armitage, M. J. 'Air Power and NATO Options." Royal Air ForcesQuarterly. 18 (Spring 1976): 17-23.

Atkoson. Edward B. 'The 'Fault Line' in the Warsaw Pact:Implications for NATO Strategy.' Orbis. 30 .1 (Spring1986): 111-131.

Bagnall, Nigel. 'Concepts of Land/Air Operations in the CentralRegion: I." RUSI Journal for Defence Studies. 129 (Sept.1984): 59-82.

Beaton, Leonard. The Western Alliance and the McNamara Doctrine.London: Institute for Strategic Studies, 1964. (U 182 .A23no.11)

Bentinck, Marc. NATO's Out-of-Area Problem. London:International Institute for Strategic Studies, 1988. (U 182.A23 no. 211)

Benz X. 0. 'Firo and Manoeuvre -- the German Armoured Corps andCombined-Arms Operation.' International Defense Review. 174 (1984): 473-478.

Betts, Richard K. *Compound Deterrence versus No-First-Use:What's Wrong is What's Right.' Orbis. 28 .4 (Winter1985): 897-718.

Bey, Victor L. NATO Military Strategy and Forces. Maxwell AirForce Base, AL: Air University, 1986. (UGB 907 .A433 88-019)

Bidlingmaier, Gerhard. "The Strategic Importance of the BalticSea.' U. S. Naval Institute Proceedings. 84 tSept. 1958):22-31.

Blanchard, George S. "CETAG/USAREUR Interoperability: A TotalProgram From the Bottom Up (Improved Cooperation of the U.S.Army Europe and other National Forces in NATO's Central ArmyGroup)." Stratedic Review. 5 .1 (Winter 1977): 7-13.

Borawski, John. 'Confidence and Security Building Measures inEurope.* Parameters. 18 (Winter 1988): 68-75.

27

4

Brady, Linda P., and Joyce P. Kaufman, ads. NATO in the 1980sChallenges and Responses. New York: Praeger, 1985. (UA848.3 .N2428 1985)

Builder, C. H. Military Criteria for NATO INF Options for the1980's. Santa Monica. CA.: Rand Corp.. 1982. (RAND P-6772)

Bull-Hansen, Fredrik. *Norway, NATO's Strategic Pivot?' RUSI

Journal ojf Defence Studies. 132 (Sept 1987): 13-17.

Bundy, William T., Jr. Tactical Airlift Ln NATO ! Lifeline toSurvival. Maxwell Air Force Base. AL: Air University, Air

War College. 1978. (UGB 907 .A43 293)

Burrell, Raymond E. Strategic Nuclear Parity and NATO DefenseDoctrine. Washington: National Defense University, ResearchDirectorate, 1978. (Gov Docs D 409:78-4)

Callaghan, Thomas A., Jr. 'Can Europe Be Defended?" PolicyReview. 24 (Spring 1983): 75-88.

Canby, Steven L. 'NATO Strategy: Political-Military Problems ofDivergent Interests and Operational Concept.' MilitaryReview. 59 (Apr. 1979): 50-8.

Chalupa, Leopold. "The Defence of Central Europe: Implicationsof Change.' RUSI Journal for Defence Studies. 130 (Mar.1985): 13-17.

Charles, Daniel. Nuclear Planning in NATO : Pitfalls of FirstUse. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co, 1987. (U 284 .C481987)

Chemical Weapons and Western Security Policy. Lanham, MD: AspenStrategy Group and University Press of America, 1987. (UA848.3 .C49 1087)

Cimbala, Stephen J. Extended Deterrence : The United States andNATO Europe. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1987. (UA64a.5 .U5 Cs8 1987)

Clark, John J. 'Is the NATO Alliance Structure Appropriate forthe 1980a? (Discusses Whether the Organization Should Takeon Global Rather Than Just European Responsibilities)."military Review. 59 (Apr. 1979): 25-34.

Coffey, Kenneth J. Strategic Implications of the All-VolunteerForce : the Conventional Defense of Central Europe. ChapelHill: University of North Carolina Press, 1979. (UA 23 .CS781979)

28

Cohen, Eliot. 'NATO Standardization: The Perils of CommonSense.' Foreign Policy. 31 (Summer 1978): 72-90.

Cook, Robin F.,* and Dan Smith. What future in NATO? London:Fabian Society. 197a. (HE 11 .V42 no. 337)

Congrave, Patrick. 'America Versus Europe.* Policy Review. 21(Summer 1982): 139-152.

Cottrell, Alvin J. 'The Foreign Policy of the Shah.' StrategicReview. 3 .4 (Fall 1975)' 32-44.

Courter, Jim. 'Can NATO Strategy Work?* Military Review. 67(June 1987): 2-13.

Croker, F. P. U. 'The Defense of Northern Norway." RUSI Journalfor Defence gtudies. 129 (Dec. 1984): 29-32.

Cross, T. *Forward Defence -- A Time for Chang*?* RUSI Journalfor Defence Studies. 130 (June 1985): 19-24.

Culver, John C. 'The Argument for Standardization.' Foreignpolicy. 31 (Summer 1978): 91-94.

Davis, Jacquelyn X., and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff. Jr. The AtlanticAlliance and U.S. Global Strastegy. Cambridge, MA: Institutefor Foreign Policy Analysis. 1983. (UA 646.3 .D37 1983)

Dean. Jonathan. 'Beyond First Use.* Foreign Policy,. 48 (Fall1982) : 37-53.

Dean, Jonathan. *How to Lose Germany.' Foreign Policy. 55(Summer 1984) : 54-72.

deLeon, Peter. 'Emerging Security Considerations for NATO'sNorthern Flank.' RUSI Journal for Defence Studies. 130(June 1985) : 34-39.

Denny, M. M. *The Atlantic in a World War-- What does it Mean?'Military Review. 37 (Sept. 1957): 73-79.

Denoon, David B. H., *ed. Constraints on Strategy : The Economicsof Western Security. Washington! PeOrgamon-Braosey's. 1986.((IA 646.3 .C84 1986)

DePuy, William. Generals- Stick and von Mellenthin on TacticsImplications for NATO Military Doctrine. McLean, VA: BDMCorporation. 1980. (U1 167 .D4)

29

Dick, C. J. 'Catching NATO Unawares: Soviet Army Surprise andDeception Techniques.' International Defense Review. 19 .1(1986): 21-26.

Dittmer, Lowell. "The Strategic Triangle: An Elementary Game-Theoretical Analysis.' World Politics. 33 .4 (July 1981):485-515.

Does the Strategy of Flexible Response Need Modifying' If So 4nWhat Way Report of a Seminar Held at the Royal UnitedService Institution on Wednesday, 4 November, 1970;. London:Royal United Service Institution, 1971. (UA 646.3 .D63)

Donnelly, C. N. *The Soviet Operational Maneuver Group: A NewChallenge for NATO; Much Effort is Devoted by Both NATO andthe Warsaw Pact to Attempt to Develop Plans That Will ProveSuccessful in the Event of War In Europe. Military Review.63 (Mar. '83): 43-60.

Donnelly, Christopher N. et al. 'Soviet Strategists TargetDenmark.' International Defense Review. 19 (1986): 1047-1051.

Douglas, Joseph D. 'Soviet Nuclear Strategy in Europe: ASelective Targeting Doctrine?* Strategic Review. 5 .4(Fall 1977): 19-;2.

Dunn, Keith A.. and William 0. Staudenmeir. 'Strategy forSurvival.' Foreign Policy. 52 (Fall 1983): 22-41.

Erickson, John. *The Northern Theater: Soviet Capabilities andConcepts.' Strategic Review. 4 (Summer 1976): 67-82.

European Security and the Nixon Doctrine : Report cf aConference. Medford, MA: The Fletcher School of Law andDiplomacy, 1972. ED 1065 -US C6)

Evans, R. S. 'The Need for Offensive Operations on Land.' RUSIJournal for Defence Studies. 121 (Sept. 1976): 28-33.

Facer, R. L. L. Conventional Forces and the NATO StrateAy ofFlexible Response: Issues and Approaches. Santa Monica, CA.:Rand Corp., 1985. (RAND R-3209-FF)

Falls. Cyril. 'Strategic Values and Weaknesses of NATO--Military Review. 36 (Feb. 1957): 73-79.

Freedman, Lawrence. 'Limited War, Unlimited Protest.' Orbis.26 .1 (Spring 1982): 89-103.

30

Freeman, Waldo D., Jr. NATO Central Reion Forward Defense:Correcting the Strategy/Force Mismatch. Washington. D.C.:National Defense University Press, 1981. (Gov Docs D 5.409/2:81-3)

Garde, Hans. 'The Influence of Navies on the European CentralFront.' U. S. Naval Institute Proceedings. 102 (May 1976),180-175.

Garvey, Gerald. Strategy and the Defense Dilemma : NuclearPolicies and Alliance Politics. Lexington, MA: LexingtonBooks, 1984. (UA 23 .052 1984)

Glass, George A. 'The United States and West Germany: Cracks inthe Security Foundationl' Orbis. 23 .3 (Fall 1979): 535-547.

Golden, James R., Asa A. Clark, and Bruce E. Arlinghaus, eds.Conventional Deterrence : Alternatives for European Defense.Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1984. (UA 646 .C675 1984)

Goodpaster, Andrew J., at al., eds. Strengthening ConventionalDeterrence in Eurie : A Program for the 1980a : EuropeanSecurity Study Reort of the Special Panel : ESECS II.Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1985. (UA 646 .E94 1985)

Gormley, Dennis M. *NATO's Tactical Nuclear Option: Past,Present and Future.* Military Review. 53 (Sept. 1973): 3-is.

Gray, Colin S. Defendino NATO-Europe : Forward Defense andNuclear Strategy. Croton-on-Hudson, NY: Hudson Institute,1977. (UA 846.3 .072)

Gray, Colin S. *Maritime Strategy and the Pacific: TheImplications for NATO.' Naval War College Review. 40(Winter 1987): 8-19.

Gray, Colin S. *NATO Strategy and the 'Neutron Bomb'.' PolicyReview. 7 (Winter 1979): 7-26.

Gueritz, E. F., et. al. NATO's Maritime Strategy: Issues andDevelopments. Washington: Pergamon-Brassey's InternationalDefense Publishers, 1987. (UA 646.3 .A834 1987, v.2)

Gurkan, Ihsan. NATO, Turkey, and the Southern Flank. New York:National Strategy Information Center, 1980. (UA 646.5 .T8G83)

31

Haas, E. B. 'On Systems and International Regimes.* WorldPolitics. 27 .2 (Jan. 1975): 147-174.

Haasler, Ruprecht and Hans Goebel. 'Uneasiness AboutTechnological Progress in the Armed Forces (Impact on NorthAtlantic Treaty Organization Strategy).' Military Review.62 (Oct. 1972): 82-72.

Halperin. Morton H. *NATO and the INF Controversy: Threats tothe Alliance.' Orbis. 26 .1 (Spring 1982): 105-116.

Harrison, Stanley L. *A New Role for NATO: An American View.*Military Review. 48 (Feb. 1968): 14-24.

Hessman, James D. 'NATO South: The Forgotten Flank.' Sea Power.22 (Sept. 1979): 17-22.

Hine, Patrick. *Concepts of Land/Air Operations in the CentralRegion: II.' RUSI Journal for Defence Studies. 129 (Sept.1984): 83-68.

Hines, John G., and Phillip A. Petersen. *The SovietConventional Offensive in Europe (A Nonnuclear Option Againstthe North Atlantic Treaty Organization; in Terms ofModernization of Forces and Changed Views on MilitaryStrategy).' Military Review. 64 (Apr. 1984): 2-29.

Hutchison, William. Joint Mid-range General Purpose ForcePlanning. Washington: National War College StrategicResearch Group, 1975. (U 162 H8)

Huygen, Maarten. "Dateline Holland: NATO's Pyrrhic Victory.'Foreign Policy. 62 (Spring 1986): 187-185.

Iwashima, Hisao. 'Japan's Defense Policy.' Strategic Review. 3.2 (Spring 1975): 17-24.

Jamgotch, Nish. 'Alliance Management in Eastern Europe: TheNew Type of International Relations.' World Politics. 27 .3(April 1975) : 405-429.

Kaplan, Lawrence S., Robert W. Clawson, and Raimondo Luraghi.NATO and the Mediterranean. Wilmington. DE: ScholarlyResources, 1985. (UA 646.5 .M4 N38 1985)

Karanowski, Stanley M. The German Army and NATO Strategy.Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press, Q82.(Gov Docs D 5.409:82-2)

32

Kennedy, Robert and John M. Weinstein. ede. The Defense of theWest : StrategAic and European Security Issues Reappraised.Boulder. CO: Westview Press, 1984. (UA 10.5 D44 1984)

Khoman, Thanat. 'The New Equation of World Power and Its Impacton Southeast Asia.' Orbis. 20 .3 (Fall 1976): 613-623.

Killebrew, Robert B. Conventional Defense and Total DeterrenceAssessing NATO's Strategic Options. Wilmington, DE:Scholarly Resources, 1986. (UA 646.3 .K476 1986)

Killebrew. Robert B. 'NATO, Deterrence and Light Divisions.'Military Review. 65 (May 1985): 2-15.

King-Harmon, Anthony L. *NATO Strategy-- A New Look.* RUSIJournal for Defence Studies. 129 (Mar. 1984): 26-29.

Kintner, William R. "A Strategic Triangle of 'Two and a HalfPowers'.' Orbis. 23 .3 (Fall 1979): 525-534.

Kleb, Geoffrey H. *NATO: A View From the East (How the WarsawPact Signatories View NATO and What Has Motivated Them in theConduct of Their International Affairs).' Military Review.56 (Nov. 1976): 3-10.

Kromer, Robert. New Weapons and NATO : Solutions. or Irritants'New York: Greenwood Press, 1987. (UA 646.3 .K76 1987)

Krone, Robert M. NATO Nuclear Policymaking. In.pI (extract fromauthor's thesis): 1972. (UA 646.3 .K75)

Laird, Robbin F. *The French Strategic Dilemma." Orbis. 28 .2(Summer 1984): 307-328.

Lakoff, Sanford A., and Randy Willoughby, ads. Strategic Defenseand the Western Alliance. Lexington, MA: Lexlngton Books,1987. (U0K 1012 .S877 1987)

Lambeth, B. S. Conventional Forces for NATO. Santa Monica, CA.:Rand Corp., 1987. (RAND P-7311)

Lane, Thomas A. *Prospects for the Atlantic Alliance.'Strategic Review. 3 .1 (Winter 1975): 39-45.

LeBourgeouis, Julian J. 'Flexibility in Naval Strategy.'Strategic Review. 3 .2 (Spring 1975): 12-16.

Legge. J. M. Theater Nuclear Weapons and the NATO Strategy ofFlexible Response. Santa Monica, CA.: Rand Corp., 1983.(RAND R-2964-FF)

33

Libby, Ruthran E. 'Portugal: A Setback for NATO.' StrategicReview. 3 .2 (Spring 1975)t 25-20.

Lind, 0. X. 'Denmark and the Baltic: Forward Defense for theUK.* RUSI Journal for Defence Studies. 130 (June 1985): 34-39.

Linsey. George R. *The Place of Maritime Strength in theStrategy of Deterrence.' Naval War College Review. 30(Spring 1978): 28-33.

Lugar, Richard G., and Robert E. Hunter, *do. Adapting NATO'sDeterrent Posture. Washington, D.C: Center for Strategic andInternational Studies, Georgetown University. 1985. (UA846.3 .A65 1985)

Lunde, Henrik 0. 'North European Oil: Implications for NATONations.' Parameters. 6 .1 (1978)! 87-98,

Mabesoone, W. C. 'Maritime Strategic Aspects of the North Sea.'RUSI Journal for Defence Studies. 129 (Sept. 1984): 12-17.

MacLaren, William G., Jr. Prompt Nuclear Defense: a PracticalConcept for NATO in the Seventies. Maxwell Air Force Base,AL! Air War College, Air University, 1970. (UGB 907 .A424187)

Martin, J. J- 'Nuclear Weapons in NATO's Deterrent Strategy."Orbis. 22 .4 (Winter 1979): 875-898.

McClane, Joseph L. *The Specialized Character of NATO.' UnitedStates Naval Institute Proceedings. 103 .4/890 (April1977)! 18-23.

McDonald, Wesley L. 'Priority Shift from NATO Could InviteDisaster.' Sea Power (Almanac of Sea Power). 30 .2 (15Jan. 1987)! 87+.

McGeoch. Ian. *NATO's Maritime Flank-- the Need for an AlliedCommand, Western Approaches to Europe.' RUSI Journal forDefence Studies. 130 (Dec. 1985): 20-26.

Meehan, F. 'NATO and Alternative Strategies.' Parameters. 18(Spring 1986): 14-23.

Milton, T. R. 'NATO's Troubled Southern Flank.' StrategicReview. 3 .4 (Fall 1975): 27-31.

Morse, John H. "Questionable NATO Assumptions.* Strategi_cReview. 5 .1 (Winter 1077)! 21-29.

34

Moss, Robert. 'On Standing Up to the Russians in Africa.*Policy Review. 5 (Summer 1978): 97-116.

Moulton, J. L. *The Marine as an Instrument of Sea Power.'United States Naval Institute Proceedings. 101 .11/873(November 1975): 28-36.

Norton, Augustus R. "NATO and Metaphors: The Nuclear Threshold.'Naval War College Review. 30 (Fall 1988): 60-75.

Nugent, Mark H. Tactical Air Control (TACS) Concept ofEmployment in NATO's Central Region. Maxwell Air Force Base.AL: Air University, 1982. (UGB 907 ,A 433 82-150)

O'Neill, Robert ed. New Technology and Western Security Policy.Hamden, CT: Archon Books, 1985. (UF 530 .N49 1985)

Palmer Joseph. 'NATO's Tender Watery Flanks.' Sea Power. 19(Mar. 1976): 34-39.

Pattie, Geoffrey E. 'Western Security Beyond the NATO Area.'Strategic Review. 12 (Spring 1984): 39-43.

Petersen, Phillip A. 'Iceland-- Is a Red Storm Risingl"International Defense Review. 20 .8 (1987): 1007-1011

Polk, James H. 'Reflections on the Czechoslovakian Invasion.1968.' Strategic Review. 5 .1 (Winter 1977): 30-37.

Puchala, D. J. 'Domestic Politics and RegionalHarmonization in the European Communities.' WorldPolitics. 27 .4 (July 1975): 496-521.

Rasmussen. Robert D. The A-IO in Central Europe : A Concept ofDeployment-Employment. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: AirUniversity, Air War College, 1978. (UGB 907 .A43 451)

Reed, Jean D. NATO'. Theater Nuclear Forces: A Coherent Strategyfor the 1980'S. Washington, D.C.: National DefenseUniversity Press, 1983. (Gov Docs D 5.409:83-8)

Reiscnauer. Edwin 0. *Back to Normalcy" Foreign Policy. 20(Fall 1975): 199-208.

Ricci, Fred J.. and Daniel Schutzer. U.S. MilitaryCommunications : A C31 Force Multiplier. Rockville. MD:Computer Science Press, 1986. (UA 940 .R53 1986)

35

Roach, James R.. ed. The United States and the AtlanticCommunity: Issues and Prospects. Austin: University ofTexas. 1967. (D 845.2 US)

Rogers, Bernard W. *Greater Flexibility for NATO's FlexibleResponse.' Strategic Review. 11 (Spring 1983): 11-19.

Rubenson. D. S., and J.L. Bonomo. NATO's Anti-Tactical BallisticMissile Requirements and their Relatlonship to the StrategicDefense Initiative- Santa Monica, Ca.: Rand Corp., 1987.(RAND R-3553-AF)

Santilli, Joseph H. *NATO Strategy Updated: A First Use Policy.'Military Review. 54 (Mar. 1974): 3-20.

Schmidt, Peter. 'Public Policy and Security Policy in theFederal Republic of Germany.' Orbis. 28 .4 (Winter 1985):719-742.

Scruton, Roger. 'Turkey: Ally Under Siege.* Policy Review. 24(Spring 1Q83): 49-55.

Seignious, George M., II, and Jonathan Paul Yates. -Europe'sNuclear Superpowers. Foreign Policy. 55 (Summer 1984): 40-53.

Senger und Etterlin, Fridolin von. 'Air-Mobile Divisions:Operational Reserves for NATO.' RUSI Journal for DefenceStudies. 132 (Mar. 1987): 23-30.

Shaw, Harry J. 'Strategic Dissensus." Foreign Policy. 61(Winter 1 85/86): 125-141.

Simons, W. E. Some Thoughts on Future European Security. SantaMonica, CA.: Rand Corp., 1978. (RAND P-6188)

Sisco, Joseph J. 'Selective Engagement.' Foreign Policy. 42(Spring 1981): 27-42.

Smith, Paul 0. Toward a Reduced U.S. Profile in NATO. MaxwellAir Force Base, AL: Air War College. Air University. 1972.(UGB 907 .A42 4721)

Snyder, Glenn H. *The Security Dilemma In Alliance Politics.*World Politics. 36 .4 (July 1984): 461-495.

Snyder, Ted. *Strengthening the NATO Alliance: Toward a Strategyfor the 1980s.' Naval War College Review. 34 (Mar./Apr.1Q81): 18-37.

36

Sokolsky, Joel J. "Soviet Naval Aviation and the Northern Flank:Its Military and Political Implications.' Naval War CollegReview. 34 (Jan./Feb. 1981): 34-45.

Stern, Laurence. 'Bitter Lessons: How We Failed in Cyprus.'Foreign Policy. 19 (Summer 1975): 34-78.

Tahirs-Kheli. Shirin and William Q. Staudenmaier. 'The Saudi-

Pakistani Military Relationship: Implications for US Policy.*Orbis. 26 .1 (Spring 1982): 155-171.

Taylor, Paul. 'The Politics of the European Communities: TheConfederate Phase.' World Politics. 27 .3 (Apr. 1975),

336-361.

Thies, Wallace J. 'On NATO Strategy: Escalation and the NuclearAllergy." Parameters. Is (Sep. 1988): 18-33.

Thompson, W. Scott. -Toward A Communist International System.'Orbis. 20 .4 (Winter 1977): 841-855.

Thomson. J. A. NATO's Strategic Choices: Defense Planning andConventional Force Modernization. Santa Monica, CA.: Rand

Corp., 1986. (RAND P-7184)

Thomson, J. A. Planning for NATO's Nuclear Deterrent in the:9IOs and :990s. Santa Monica. CA.: Rand Corp., 1982. (RANDP-681 8:

Tillson. John C. F., IV. 'The Forward Defense of Europe.'Military Review. 61 (May. 1981:: 66-76.

T'w, William T. "NATO's Out-of-Region Challenges and ExtendedContanment.' Orbis. 2 .4 (Wlnter 1985': 829-855.

Tracy. Nicholas. Canada's Foreign Policy Objectives and CanadianZeourity Arrangements in the North. Ottawa. Canada: Dept. ofNational Defence. Operational Research and Analysis

Establishment. '6, 171A 600 T7)

Tyler. Wayne L. Nuclear Sujrvivability of Tactical Nuclear Forcesan. Fvaluati:.n 1f Alternatives Maxwell Air Force Base. AL:

Aar Unversitv. Air War College. l978, (UGB 907 A43 5¢0"

B. Cci~r~ress House. Commttee on 3overnment OperatiOnS. The:n-,ementaton :,f the NATC, Lorg-Term Defense Program (LTDP.H, use Rep rt 97-'7 97th Cong . 1st sess. Washington: 1F0.1 . '3:., 1 1Y :13426

37

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services. NATO andthe Economic Recession. Report of Senator Dan Quayle.Committee Print. 97th Cong., 2nd seas. Washington: GPO.1982. (Gov Does Y 4 Ar 5/3: N 81/8)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services. NATODefense and the INF Treaty. Hearings. 100th Cong., 2nd sees.Washington: GPO, 1988. (Gov Does Y 4.Ar 5/3:S.hrg. 100-493/pt I-)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Armed Services. NATO: Canthe Alliance be Saved? Committee Print. 97th Cong., 2ndseas. Washington: GPO, 1982. (Gov Does Y 4 Ar 5/3: N 81/7)

U. S. Congress. Office of Technology. New Technology for NATO:Implementing Follow-on Forces Attack. Washington: GPO, 1987.(Gov Does Y 3.T 22/2:2 N 81/2)

U. S. Congress. House Committee on Foreign Affairs. Overviewof Nuclear Arms Control and Defense Strategy in NATO.Hearings. 97th Cong., 2nd seas. Washington: GPO, 1982.(Gov Docs Y 4.F 76/I:N 81/11)

U. S. Congress. Congressional Budget Office. Strengthening NATO:Pomcus and Other Approaches. Washington: GPO, 1979. (GovDocs Y 10 .9: N 81)

U. S. Congress. Congressional Budget Office. U. S. Air andGround Forces for NATO: Air Defense Issues. Washington: GPO,1978. (Gov Does Y 10 .9: Al 7/2)

U. S. Congress. Congressional Budget Office. U. S. AirliftForces: Enhancement Alternatives for NATO and Non-NATOContingencies. Washington: GPO, 1979. (Goy Docs Y 10 .9: Ai7/4)

U. S. General Accounting Office. NATO's New Defense Program:Issues for Consideration. Washington: PO., 1979. (Gov DocesGA 1.13:ID-79-4-A Mfiche)

Ullman, Richard H. 'Alliance With Israel?' Foreign Policy. 19(Summer 1975): 18-33.

Vego. Milan. 'Soviet Envelopment Option on the Northern Flank.'Naval War College Review. 39 (Autumn 1986): 26-38.

Wall. Patrick. 'The Mediterranean: Three Continents, EighteenNations, Five Theaters of Conflict.' Sea Power. 27.(Special Edition) (15 Apr. 1984): 52-55.

38

Wall, Patrick. *NATO's Vulnerable Northern Flank.' Sea Power.28 (Dec. 1985): 34-38.

Wendt, J. C., and P.A. Wilson. Toward Multipolar Deterrence.Santa Monica. CA.! Rand Corp., 1988. (RAND P-7407)

West, F. J., Jr. "NATO I: Common Boundaries for CommonInterests." Naval War College Review. 34 (Jan./Feb. 1981):59-67.

West, F. J., Jr. 'U. S. Naval Forces and the Northern Flank ofNATO.' Naval War C Review. 32 (July/-Aug. 1979): IS-25.

Whetten, Lawrence L. *A European View of NATO Strategy.'Military Review. 51 (Sept. 1971): 25-37.

Williams, James H. 'NATO: Out-of-Sector Interests in the MiddleEast.' Military Review. 65 (Oct. 1985): 54-63.

Wilson, Louis L., Jr. 'The Future of Air Power in the Pacific.'Strateglc Review. 5 .3 (Summer 1977): 40-46.

Windass, Stan ed. Avoiding Nuclear War : Common Security asaStrategy for the Defence of the West. Wasbington, D.C:Brassey's Defense Publishers. 1985. (UA 646 .A96 1985)

Yost, David S., ed. NATO's Strategic Options : Arms Control andDefense. New York: Pergamon Press, 1981. (UA 646.3 .N2471981)

Zeiner-Oundersen, H. F. NATO's Maritime Flanks: Problems andProspects. Washington, D.C.: Pergamon-Brassey'sInternational Defense Publishers, 1987. (UA 646.3 .A8341987, v.3)

39

V. ARMS CONTROL AND THE ALLIANCE

Alexiev, Alex R. 'The Soviet Campaign Against INF: Strategy,Tactics, and Means.* Orbis. 29 .2 (Summer 1985): 319-350.

Alternative Defence Commission (Great Britain). Defence Withoutthe Bomb ! The Report of the Alternative Defence CommissionSet U by the Lansbury House Trust Fund. New York:International Publications Service, Taylor & Francis Inc,1983. (UA 647 .A667 1983)

Baker, John D. , Jr. *Detente: Myth and Reality.' MilitaryReview. 57 .12 (December 1977): 41-50.

Baumann, Carol Edler, ed. Europe in NATO : Deterrence, Defense,and Arms Control. New York: Praeger, 1987. (UA 646.3 .E791987)

Birrenbach, Kurt. 'European Security: NATO, SALT and theEquilibrium.* Orbis. 22 (Summer 1978): 297-308.

Blackwill, Robert D. 'Conceptual Problems of Conventional ArmsControl." International Security. 12 (Spring 1988): 28-47.

Bowman, William R. LimitIng Conventional Forces in Europe.Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press, 1985.(Gov Docs D 5.409:C 74)

Cohen, Samuel T. 'Rethinking the Unthinkable.' Policy Review.18 (Fall 1981): 139-145.

Darilek, Richard E. 'Future of Conventional Arms Control inEurope. A Tale of Two Cities: Stockholm, Vienna.* Survival.29 (Jan./Feb. 1987): 5-20.

Dougherty, James E., and Robert L. Pfaltzgraff, eds. ShatteringEurope's Defense Consensus : The Antinuclear Protest Movementand the Future of NATO. Washington: Pergamon-Brassey'sInternational Defense Publishers, 1985. (UA 648.3 .S4361985)

Dunn, Lewis A. 'Considerations after the INF Treaty-- NATO afterGlobal 'Double Zero'.* Survival. 30 (May/June 1988): 195-209.

Frye, Alton. *Slow Fuse on the Neutron Bomb.' Foreign Policy.31 (Summer 1978): 95-103.

40

Gallo, Jon A. MBFR : A Question of Limits on the United StatesAir Force. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Air University, AirWar College, 1978. (UCIB 907 .A43 343)

Garfinkle, Adam M. *The "INF' Arena after Reykjavik: A BroaderU.S. Approach9" Strategic Review. 14 (Fall 1986): 27-36.

Generals for Peace and Disarmament : A Challenge to US/NATOStrategy. New York: Universe Books. 1984. (UA 646.3 .G3441984)

German, Robert K. "Nuclear-Free Zones: Norwegian Interest.Soviet Encouragement.* Orbia. 25 .2 (Summer 1982)- 451-476.

Gray, Colin S. 'Deterrence and Defense in Europe: RevisingNATO's Theater Nuclear Posture.' Strategic Review. 3 .2(Spring 1975): 58-69.

Gray, Colin S. NATO and Arms Reduction Proposals. Fairfax, VA:National Institute for Public Policy. 1983. (UA 646.3 .G7251983)

Gray, Colin S. 'NATO Defense and Arms-Reduction Proposals.'Military Review. 63 (Oct. 1983): 62-8.

Gray, Colin S. 'NATO's Nuclear Dilemma.' Policy Review. 22(Fall 1982): 97-116.

Gray, Colin S. 'SALT II: The Real Debate.' Policy Review. 10(Fall 1979): 7-22.

Hahn, Walter F. 'Nuclear Proliferation.' Strategic Review. 3.1 (Winter 1975): 16-24.

Hamm, Manfred R. 'Deterrence, Chemical Warfare, and ArmsControl.' Orbis. 29 .1 (Spring 1985): 119-163.

Hine, Patrick. "Impact of Arms Control on the Balance of Nuclearand Conventional Forces.' RUSI Journal of Defence Studies.132 (Dec. 1987): 8-12.

Holm, Hans-Henrik and NikolaJ Petersen, eds. The EuropeanMissiles Crisis : Nuclear Weapons and Security Policy. NewYork: St. Martin's Press. 1983. (UA 646 E9235 1983)

Horowitz, Dan and Robert J. Lieber. 'Nuclear Winter and theFuture of Deterrence.' Washington Quarterly. 8 (Summer1985): 59-70.

41

l(nmp, Karl-Heinz. 'Prospects for Conventional Arms Control inEurope.' International Defense Review. 20 .11 (1987):1473-1476.

Kelleher, Catherine McArdle. Germany and the Politics of NuclearWeapons. New York: Columbia University Press, 1975. (HD9698 .042 K44)

Kross, Walter. NATO: New Role in a SALT Environment. MaxwellAir Force Base, AL: Air Command and Staff College. AirUniversity, 1975. (UA 646.3 .K764)

Lynch, Allen ed. Building Security in Europe. New York:Institute for East-West Security Studies, 1986. (JX 1974.B744 1986)

Makins, Christopher J. "Bringing in the Aliens.' ForeinPolicy. 35 (Summer 1979): 91-l08.

Mellenthin, F. W. von. NATO Under Attack : Why the WesternAlliance Can Fight Outnumbered and Win in Central EuropeWithout Nuclear Weapons. Durham, NC: Duke University Press,1984. (UA 646.3 .M35 1984)

Quayle, Dan. 'After the INF Treaty: the NATO DefenseInitiative.* Strategic Review. 16 (Winter 1988): 9-13.

Robbins, Edward B. The Political and Military Realities of USMilitary Force Reductions in Europe. Maxwell Air Force Base.AL: Air War College, Air University, 1972. (UGB 907 .A424702)

Ruehle, Michael. 'Anti-missile defense in Europe and the ABMTreaty.' Strategic Review. 15 (Spring 1987): 49-57.

Skaggs, David C. "MR Update: MBFR (Mutual and Balanced ForceReduction Talks).' Military Review. 67 (Feb. 1987): 85-94.

Thomson, J. A. The Arms Control Challenge to the Alliance.Santa Monica. CA.: Rand Corp.. 1987. (RAND P-7382)

Thomson. J. A. and N. C. Gantz. Conventional Arms ControlRevisited: Objectives in the New Phase. Santa Monica. CA:Rand Corporation, 1987. (Rand N-2697-AF)

Treverton. Gregory F. "Managing NATO's Nuclear Dilemma.'International Security. 7 (Spring 1983): 93-115.

42

U. S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. Soviet PropagandaCampai9k Against NATO, Washington: GPO, 1983. (Gov Docs AC1.2! So 8)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. SALT andthe NATO Allies. Committee Print. 96th Cong., let sess.Washington: GPO. 1979. (Gov Docs Y4 .F 76/2: St 8/6)

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. SecondInterim Report on Nuclear Weapons in Europe. CommitteePrint. 98th Con., lot sess. Washington: GPO, 1983. (GovDocs Y 4 .F 76/2: S.prt. 98-3)

U. S. Dept. of State. Bureau of Public Affairs. NATO and NuclearDeterrence. Washington: GPO. 1981. (Gov Docs S 1.71/4:319)

U. S. Dept. of State. Bureau of Public Affairs. Nuclear ArmsControl and the NATO Alliance. Washington: GPO. 1984. (GovDoes 5 1.71/4:591)

Wendt. J. C. Improving the NATO Force Planning Process: Lessonsfrom Past Efforts. Santa Monica, CA.: Rand Corp.. 1986.(RAND R-3383-USDP)

Williams, Phil. 'SALT. Strategy, and Atlantic Relations.* RUSIJournal for Defence Studies. 124 (Mar. 1979): 50-54.

Younger. George. "INF and Beyond. RUSI Journal for DefenceStudies. 133 (Spring 1988): 3-6.

43

VI. NATO'S FUTURE

Alexander, Michael. '1988: How Well Will the Alliance Cope?'RUSI Journal for Defence St-udies. 133 (Spring 1988): 9-14.

Allen, Richard V. 'The Atlantic Alliance at a Crossroad (Effectof New United States Policy Directions: Based on ConferencePre~entation) . Strategic Review. 9 (Fall 1981): 9-14.

Broadhurst, Arlene Idol, ed. The Future of European AllianceSystems : NATO and the Warsaw Pact. Boulder, CO: WestviewPrees, 1982. ((IA 548 .F87 1982)

Carrington, Peter A. R. 'NATO and the Warsaw Pact: FutureRelationships and Strategies.' RUSI Journal for DefenceStudies. 132 (Dec. 198'7): 3-7.

Dinter, Elmar and Paddy Griffith. Not Over I Christmas * NATO'sCentral Front in World War III, New York: Hippocrene Books,1983. ((IA 846.3 D056 19'83)

Else, Daniel H. 'America's History: Its Future and the NATOAlliance.' RUSI Journal for Defence Studies. 131 (Dec.1986): 51-56.

Hahn, Walter F. *Does NATO have a Future?' InternationalSecurity Review. 5 (Summer 1980): 151-172.

Hoag, M. W. Counterforce. Conventional Arms, and Confusion: AComment on the Brussels Conference. Snta Monica. CA.! RandCorp. , 1980. (RAND P-8485)

Hunt. Kenneth. 'NATO Strategy and Force Postures for the Next 20Years.' Naval War College Review. 36 (Sept./Oct. 1983)! 61-74.

Hunter, Robert E., ed. NATO. the Next Generation. Boulder, CO!Westview Press. 1084. (UA 646.3 .N2464 1984)

Kaiser. Karl. 'NATO Strategy Toward the End of the Century.'Naval War College Review. 37 (Jan./Feb. 1984): 69-82.

Levine, R. A. NATO. the Subjective Alliance: The Debate Over theFuture. Sant-a Monica. CA.: Rand Corp. , 1988. (RAND R-3607-FF/CC/RC)

Maoksey, Kenneth. First Clash : Combat Close-yR Ln Wol WarThree. London: Arms and Armou,,. Press, 1985. (UA 646.3 .M2241985)

44

Messenger, Charles. Armies of World War 3. New York: MilitaryPress, c1984. (0 815 .M4 1984)

Myers. Kenneth A.. ed. NATO, the Next Thirty Years ! TheChanging Political, EonomicT, and Mlitax Setting. Boulder.CO: Westview Press. 1980. (JX 1393 .N67 937 1980)

National Security Affairs Conference 13-15 July 1981. The1980's: Decade of Confrontation? Washington. D.C.: NationalDefense University Press, 1981. (Gov Docs D 5.412:981)

Platt, A. A., ed. The Atlantic Alliance: Perspectives from theSuccessor Generation. Santa Monica. CA.: Rand Corp., 1983,(RAND R-3100-NIS/USIA/DOS/FF/RC)

Reed. John A. GermanX and NATO. Washington. D.C.: NationalDefense University Press, 1987. (Gov Docs D 5.402: 031)

Rogers, Bernard W. *NATO: The Next Decade.' RUSI Journal forDefence Studies. 127 (Dec. 1982 : 3-6.

Sadoff, Laurence R. 'The Future of Standardization in NATO.'Military Review. 62 (Feb. 1982): 47-54.

Scalingi. Paula. 'The European Community in 1981: Pondering atthe Crossroads.' Orbis. 25 .1 (Spring 19811: 123-144.

Sloan, Stanley R. NATO's Future : Toward a Vew TransatlanticBargain. Washington. DC: National Defense University Press,1985. (Gov Docs D 5.402:N 81)

Takeshita, Lloyd S. *Strategic Defense Initiative and NATO.'Military Review. 66 (Apr. 1986): 31-37.

Thies, Wallace J. 'What Future for the Atlantic Alliance'?Parameters. 16 (Summer 1986): 26-35.

U. S. Congress. Senate. Delegation to NATO Capitals. The INFTreaty and the Future of the Alliance. 100th Cong.1. ndsess. Washington: GPO. 1988, (Gov Docs Y 1.1/2':100-271

U. S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. A NATOStrategy for the 1990's. Hearings. 99th Cong., lst sezs.Washington: GPO. 1986. (Gov Zccs Y 4 .F '6,2:S. hrg. -9-4,:,01pt,5)

.S Congress. House. Committee or, Freign Affairs. NA'C'sFuture Role. Hearings. 97th Cong.. 2nd sess. Washintcn:GPO, 1982. (Gov Docs Y 4.F 76/':N 4i/12(

45

U. S. Congress. House. Committee on Foreign Affairs. RoundtableDiscussion on United States Policy Toward Europe. Hearings.100th Cong., lWt sess. Washington: GPO, 1988. (Gov Docs Y 4.F 76/1: R 69/987)

Udis, Bernard. "Lessons from Aerospace: The Prospects forRationalization in NATO.' Orbis. 25 .1 (Spring 1981): 165-196-

Warnke. Paul C. 'We Don't Need a Devil (To Make or Keep OurFriends).' Foreign Policy. 25 (Winter 1976/1977): 78-87.

46