Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
UNCLASSIFIED
AD2 6 9'8 8 3AD ----e
Best Available Copy tw,
ARMED SERVICES TECHNICAL IORION AGENCYARLINGfl)N HALL STATIONARLINGTON 12, VIRGINIA
UNCLASSIFIED
3YITICB: When doveinment or other drwinss, speci-fie'itions or ottor data are used. fow any pn~oseother than In connection with a defimitely related.govermet procuremnt operation.. the U. 5.Gsovernment thereby incurs no responsbib1ity,, nor anyobliS~tion mhatmoeverl and. the fta-t that the GowreR-"ant my have fommulatedp furnished., or to =Wwz'upplied the said. daweinps, ispifications,, or otherdata Is nat tc I- regazed. by iliuicotion or other-vise as in any . & =or licensing the ba~ir or anyallker person ow corporation, or conveying any rigbtsor pezmission to manutzatiare,, use or sell axWpatented. Invention that uy In any vay be i-elated.thereto.
4*lb
TRANSIENT HEAT AND MLOISTUJRE TRANSFER IX SKINTHRCIUGH THRM&LLY IRRADIATED CLOTH
Technical Report No. 8
f row
Fuels Research LaboratoryMa~ssachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts
H. C. Hottel0G. C. wi~lliamsdG. H.'Miede1
C~rnrI 7ecember 26, 1961
Project Nos.* 7-12-01-002Cand 7.49-01-001
Con~tract No. ID 19-129-QI-LS92Quarterme ter ftesearcb and Engineering COOMnd
united .States Army
W NITPro Jeclt
Reproduction in whole or in part is A STIpermitted l'y the United S tates aewW
LAN 2 93
Gowe 7 ~~ 2 jI 'P$A
I" 'II
jaa
I IN
j!! a;J l :
MA 11
Aj Ai
A i I '
, •ljiii1l
a m o .!° . • •
Mell 5 l, s it. I l . 4 ml j q l, I fdtiI
d . :,+,l i f I
+,41 '
TRANSIENT HEAT AND MOISTURE TRANSFE TO SKINTHROUGH THERMALLY InfADIATED CLOTH
Technical Report No. 8
from
Fuels Research LaboratoryMassachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, MAssachusetts
H. C. HottelG. "C. V ill aa..
G. H. 'MiedelIV. T. Chen
V. P. Jensen
Dnceuber '2 1961
Project Moe. 7-12-01-002Cacm 7-99-01-001
Contract No. VA 19-129-QW-1592Qsarterwaster Research sad Bagineering Comand
United States Army
NIT ProjectDS 8556
Reproduction in %tole or in part ispermitted by the United States Government
r1
"TABLE OF CONTES
PAGE
7, INTRODUCTION 1
11. EXPMIA434L I
A. Skin simulajt 1B. Cloth Samples 2C. rolar Furnace 2D, Temperature Measurement 2
I11. FROCEDWUR 4
IV. EXPEIMENTAL RESULTS 4V. ThMEICrICAL - MY CLOIH OVE SKIN SIJULUTIII S' I 5
A. The Mathematical'Model 3B. General Solution 8
1. Application to other types of cloth including thosehaving direct transmittance 9
2. Application to relaxation period 103. Application to non-square save radiant source 10
C. Discussion of Results 11
1. Properties of the cloth and skin aimlsat i112. Comparison of the theoretical amalvsls with the
exp?,.aental data on the dry cloth - &ai gap -skin .mulant system 12
VI. THEORTICAL - MOIST CLOTH OVER SKIN SINUIANT SYSTM 14
'A. The Mathematical Model 14B. Method of Solution 17
1I Dimensionless formulation of the basic equations 172. Difference equations and solution algorithm 193, Remarks on the boundary conditiomn and variable
water vapor diffusivity 244. Summary of the computer prosram 255. Stability 286, Convergence 35T. Time-variant irrsdia-cion intensity 37. oun severity correlation 41
Co Discussion of Results 43
1. Numerical values used in the cowmitations 442. Constant irradiation - influece of transfer
cpefficients and diffusivity; comparlsonwith cxperim,,ts 45
3. Time-variant irradiation - influence of pulseshapes 48
4. Time-variant irradiation - comparison withexperimets 50
S. Remark on tte burn severity correlation 52
VII. buMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
APPBN1IX A Nomenclature 54
APPENDIX B Method of Solution - Dry Cloth over SkinSimulant S)s ten 58
A. Opaque Cloth 58
1. Basic equations 582. Boundary conditions 593. Numerical solution - modified Schmidt technique 594. Stability and accuracy 62
B. Diathermanous Cloth 62
I' Basic ea,'-tions 622. Boundary condition at the front cloth surface 633. Boundary conditions in the air gap 644. Siaplified ganeral solution for diathermanous
cloth 64
APPEWTTIX C Solution Algorithm - Moist Cloth - SkinSimulant Sys ten 68
APPENDIX D Mass and Heat BOtance - Moist Cloth - Skin
Simulant System 73
APPENDIX B Computer Program Description 75
A. kunction vf Main- aid Subprograms 75
1. MAIN prozr-i% 752. SUDP 763. DOUBIN, DWB, T•B 764. PULSE 765. PARA 776. EG 777. CHAING 77
B. Machi.e Timc Consumption 77
APPSNDIX F Summary of Computer Solutions on Moist Cloth -Skin Siaulant System 92
APPENDIX G ft;&ilibrium Data on Moist Cloth 134
APPENDIX H Bibliography 137
J I, ; ~~. ... 1
/:
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. PAGE
1.1 Dry-Cloth - Air Gap - Skin .imulant System 5
1.2 Illustration ro Finite-Difference Derivation 59
1.3 Illustration to Finite-Difference Derivation 60
1.4 Illustration to Finite-Difference Derivation 61
1.5 Skin Simulant No. 10 93
1.6 Skin Simulant No. li 93
1.7 Experimental Results on Dry Opaque (Deep Black, Black,Dark Gray) Cloth - Skin Simulant System 94
1.8 Experimental Resultq on Dry Medium Gray Cloth - SkinSimulant Sys tea 94
1.9 Experimental Results on Dry Light Gray Cloth - SkinSimulant System 95
1.10 Experimental Results on Dry White (With COC) ClothSkin Simulant System 95
1.11 Heat Transfer to Skin Simulant Through Moist OpaqueCloth 96
1.12 Heat Transfet to Skin Simalant Through MoistOihthqr-smos Cloth 96
1.1. Effect ot ;loth DiLthermancy on the Heat Transferto the Skin Simulant
1.14 Effect of Cloth Diathermancy on the Heat Transferto the Skin Simulant 97
1.15 Effect of Doubling the Thermal Conductance of Clothon the Heat Transfer to the Skin Simulant 96
1.16 Effect of Halving the Thickness of Cloth op theHeat Transfer to the Skin Simulant 98
1.17 iffect of U° and U.0 on the Heat Transfer to the SkinSimulant Thlough Dy Opaque Cloth 99
1.18-1.19 Tenmper-ture Response in the Skin Simulant Duringand After Irradiation
1.18 System: Dry Opaque Cloth in Contact with Skin Simulant 99
1.19 Systems Dry White Cloth in Contact with Skin Simulant 100
1,20 Comparison of Experimental Results on Dry Opaquerloth - Skin Simulant System with Theoretical Anulysis.Effect of U°, U and 1. 100
09i
FIGURE NO. PAGE
1.21 Comparison of Experimental Results on Dry M4edium GrayCloth - Skin Simulant System with Theoretical Analysis.Effects of U0 and UO 101
a ii-^2 Comparison of Experimental Results on Dry Light
Gray Cloth - Skin Simulant System with TheoreticalAnalysis. Effects of UO and U0 101
011.23 Comparison of Experimental Results on Dry White
(with CMC) Cloth - Skin Simulant System withTheoretical Analysis. -rfects of U0 and Ur 102
0 11.24 Comparison of Experimetatal Results on Dry Opaque
Cloth - Skin Simulant System with TheoreticalAnalysis. Effect of Residual Moisture in Cloth 102
1.25 Comparison of Experimental Results on Dry OpaqueCloth - Skin Simulant System with TheoreticalAnalysis. Effect of Thermal Conductance of Cloth. 103
1.26 Temperature in Clothed Skin Simulant Exposed to Non-Square Wave Radiation (Nuclear Explosion Pulse). 104
1.27 Comparison of Temperature Response in Clothed SkinSimulant Irradiated by Square-Wave Radiation andRadiation from a Nuclear Explosion. 104.
2.1 Slab Division for s - Cloth - Skin SimulantSys tem 20
2.2 Illustratior to Heat Boundary Ctndition at frontSurface of .15th, for Partially Dry Cloth 25
2.3 irradiation Pulse Shapeb 4;
2.4a-2.4b Convergence of Theoretical Solution. Influence ofM , AX 0 and ASO on Temperature Response of Skin;1mulant
2.4a Intensity I a 0.5 cal/cuasec 105
2.4b Intensity I1 a 1.0 cal/cmssec 106
2.4c Convergence of Theoretical Solution. Influence ofMA, U2 and AtSBon Temperature Response of Cloth.Intensity 10 W 0.5 cal/c.ssec 107
2.5 Tridiagonal Equation System for Solution of Equation
2.14 108
2.6 B6i/agonal Eqlation Syster for Solution of Equation22.14 109
2.7 Flow-Chart of Main Program. Moist Cloth - SkinSimulant System 110
2.8 Plow-Chart of Subprogram SUB. Moist Cloth -
Skin Simulant System 111
2.9 Make-up of Run Card Deck 112
F iGURE M). PAG..B2M10 Theoretical Solution fcc Moist Cloth - Skin Simulant
2:ysten (Opaque). Influence of Heat and Mass TransferCoe ff icien s. 113
2.11-3,212 Temperature Response of Moist Cloth - Skin SimulantSystem (Opaque). Comparison of Theoretical andBxperLwntal Results. Intensity Io a 0.83 cal/cmsec 113
2.13 Theoretical Solution for Moist Cloth - Skin SimulantSystem (Opaque). Influence of Fixed = VariableDif fusivity. 114
2.14 Theoretical Solution fcc Moist Cloth - Wk a SimulantSystem (Opaque). Influence of Transfer Coefficients 115
2.15-3,17 Temperavure Response of Moist Cloth - Skin SiaalantSystem (Opaque). Comparison of Theoretical andBxpet men ta L Results.
2.15 Intensity 1o0 0.5 cal/cmesec 11!
3.16 Intensity 1o0 1.26 cal/cassec 116
2.17 Intensity 10 a 3.96 cal/cm'sec 116
2.18 Affect of Intensity on the Temperature Response ofa Moist Cloth - Skin Simulant System. (TheoreticalSolution). Cloth a Opaque, 9.1% 1el. Hum'dity,Temperature a 30 0 C 117
2.19 Hffect nf Intensity on the Temperature Response ofa Moi. • 'loth - Skin Simulant System. (TheoreticalSolution). Cloth a White, W-49 9.1S Rel. Humidity,Temperature a 30C 1.17
2.20-3.21 Temperature Response of a Moist Opaque Cloth - SkinSimulant Systen. Influence of Irradiation PulseShape.
2.20 Pu4se Area a 0.545 cal/cmesec 118
2.21 Pulse Area a 1.09 cal/ca~sec 119
2,22-3X25 Temperature Response of a Moist Cloth - Skin SaulsatSystem (Opaque). Comparison of leoretical andExperimentak Results for Sqfare-ve Irradist ion.Mals Invensity Irota a 1.0 cal/-m'sec
2.22 Variation of Heat and Mass Transfer Coefficients atConstant Diffusivity D" 120
2.23 Variation of Heat and Mass Tratnfet Coefficients atConstant Diffusivity D" 120
2.24 Variation of Heat and Mass Transfir Coefficients atConstant Diffusivity W1' 121
2.25 Variable Diffusivity r 121
FIGURE NO. FAGE
2.26 -427 Temperatire Response of a Moist Cloth - Skin SimulvntSy3tem (Opaque). Comparison of Theoretical andExperimental Results for Square-Wave Irradiation.Max. Intensity, I c 1.4 ral/caosec
2.26 Constant Diffusivity D" 122
2.27 Variable Diffusivity D" 122
3.x-3.22 Complete Computer Solution for the Moist OpaqueCloth - Skin Simulant System
3.1 -3.7 10 a 0.83 dal/cm2 sec; Vaziation of Heat and MassTransfer Cnefficients 123 - 126
3,8.-3.16 Calculations with Irradiation Pulses of DifferentShapes and Amplitudes, Equal Area 126 - 130
3.17-3.22 Calculations with Square-Wave Irradiation at1oazx a 1.0 and 1.4 cal/cnesec and 4 sec. ExposureTime; 65% Rel. Humic.±ty. (Used for Compa:ison withExperiments). 131 - 133
LIST OP TABLE
PAGE
1.1 Optical Properties of Cloths (Integrated VaLies over Solar
Spec trum) 3
2.1 Thermqgwlear Pulse Intensity Distribution 40
B.L Cumput:r Program Listing - Moist Cloth - Skin SimulantSystem 79
G.1 Equilibrium Moisture Content of Cloth as a function ofTemperature and Relative Humidity 135
G.2 Gradients of Equilibrium Moisture Content of Cloth asFunctions of Tmperature and Partial Water Vapor Pressure 136
, S
PCREW(RD
This report was prepared by the 1luelz Research Laboratory of the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology under Contract No. DA-l9-29-C*4-
1592, Project Nos, 7-12-Q1-OOZC and 7-99-01-001, Quartermaster Research
and Eng~ineering Command, United Stlatei Army. The work was administered
under the direction of the Pioneering Division, Headquarters, Quartermaster
Research and.Engineering Command, United States Army.
This report covers work conducted fron December 1960- to October 1961.It incorporates a review of the underlying work donte under the associated
contract No. DA-i9-129-QM..454.
The authors gratefully acimawledge the Important contribution of
Professor P. L. Thibault Brian, Chemical Engineering Department,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, to the theoretical analysis~and
also tne *timulating discussions with t4r. Cristobal. Bonifaz, research
assistant, on the mathematical side of the project. The computatinns "ere
carried, out on the IBM 709 digital computer of the MIT Computation Center,
Finally, the careful preparation of the text and graphs by Miss Sally Drew
is much appreciated.
AaSUACT
A study has been made of the action of cloth in protecting skin from
thermal injury resulting from exposure to high-intensity thermal radiation.
Methods have been developed to obtain temperature-time-depth data fur
a system simulating skin covered by a layer of dry or moist cloth. Bxperiso
mentally this has been accomplished by the use of a copper-air simlant
which accepts heat at the same rate as.human skin but develops a propor-
tionally stretched temperature profile.
The analysis of tim moist cloth-4kin simulsnt system involves some
simplifying assumptloe regarding the mode of moisture transport. It
Is applirable to low- and medium-intensity exposures constant or .variable
in time. The solution is not general but requires new computer calculations
for every *pecific case. The model yields reasonable estimates of the
skin taenperature response due to the unc'ertainty af a nmber of physical
parameters there is a margin of tolerance which could be narrowed by
further experiments combined with further calculations. 7he description
of the intermediate role of moisture flow as cootrihutbnK to tie heat
transport may still require refinseent; however, thmre is us yet no simplewmy to evaluate the bi r. of water vapor through the poree of a fabric.
The current method facilitates the inspection of the Influencce ues
temperature distribution In the skin of various system properties and the
surrounding conditions.
The skin enthalpy rise above a critical temperature level, a feasible
basis for correlating burn data, has been found to be very sensitive to
slight variations in the temperature response and deserves further testi'4.
Besides an account of recent research, this project incorporates a
review of the experimental work done earkier and of the mathematical
aodels with the methods for their solution.
L. IN7ROIXJICW-IO
Althcouh thermal injury to skin has been an important aedical problem for
many years, quantitative studies on the relation between the temperature history
and the production of cutaneous damage' did not begin until the forties by
Mantz and Henriques (5,,L5,.16, 17). The importance of knowing the tomperature
history of skin during its exposure to thermal energy was pointed out by
these authors. However, the problem of measuring the temperature rise in
skin remains unsolved. The difficulty lies in th" fact that the epidermis
of the skin whire the temperature history is essential to the analysis is only
80a thick, aid measurement of the temperature profile in such a thin laysr
is stillbeyond presently known techniques. In previous studies, (3) we
have developed skin sinulants made of copper and air with a stretch factor
(depth Wrinification) 28.4 times that of skin. Thus the temperature profile
in a skin-*yer 100p thick can be measured accurately by means of the simulant
over a distance of 2.84 sm.
The sinulart has been used in evaluating the energy transport prncesses
in a cloth-air gap-skin sýtex by exposing the test assembly to high intensity
solar radiation. Rxle. mental temperature-time-depth data were thus obtained
on the simulant. This paper presents the results of these experiments aad
the uuthematical models proposed to describe the energy transport process
in such system. The presentation is divided into, two parts. The first part
deals with the dry cloth-skin system in which the Moat transfer by conduction
and radiation through the cloth layer is considered; the second part deals
with the moist cloth-skin system in which in addition to conduction and radiation,
diffusion of the moisture in the cloth layer also contributes importantly to
the heat transfer from the cloth to the skin.
II. =PFRi4EW~kL
A. SKIN SIMUIANT
The principal inuterest in the present experiments was the temperatt.e-
time-depth variation in the skin simulant. No attempt as made to measure the
temperatura in any part of the cloth. In previous studies (5, 12) it was
concluded that the complexity al the cloth structure made it impossible to
identify the cloth "Surfaces'* unambiguuusly. Consequently, little- signif icance
could be ascribe'1 to experimentally measured cloth temperatu~res.
A soldered fin-type skin simulant (skin similant #10) (3, 5) was used in
all "in-contact,* rt'ns. It consisted of sixteen fins, with twelve mutually
parallel and four perpendiculipr to the twelve to block the- exposed air space
and help to maintain more nearly iso~hezns in the Individual fins of the main
uimailant. The fins were copper sheets, each 3.175 cu. and 7.95 cm. x 0.0102 cm.
thick, bent into shallow channels as shown in Figure 1.5. The four guard fins
were bent to a 3-inch rudius arc in a specially aschined din. In oeder to
make simulants of this type 3yiunetrical, six channels f~ce one way ard six the
opposite way, i~e., all the flange toes faced'toward the center of the simulante
The fi ns were soldered to a top sheet of coyper lsving dimensions of 4.37 x
3.61 cm. x 0.0102 cm. thick, Five 0.0025 ca. disameter constantan wires were
soldered onto the central copper fin, forming the hot Junctions of the thermo-
couples. TIe five wires were led out, fran -the bottom and soldered to heavierconstants: leads 0#24 B. and S. gage). A common copper lead wire was soldered
to the copper sheet. The cold junction for the theymocouples consisted ofseveral massive cop;4r blocks, one for each cons tsetan lead and? another for the
copper lead wire. The Js f%. ions were located inside the constant temperature
box, where connections to the temperature recorder were made. A cylirz'!_z1simulant as shown in Figure 1.6 was also used in several experiments in which
the cloth sample was set 0.038 ca. from the top sur-face of the simulant.
B. CL07H SAMPLU
A series of six "standard" 9-cunce cotton sattee and 9-ounce Olive Green
uniform c~uoth supplied by the Quartermaster Research acd Development Command
at Natick, Karisachumetts, were used in the present investigation.
The optical properties of. the cloths (5, 6) have been determiuied bythe Naval Material Laboratory co~vering the wave-length range from 0.40 to
2.7 .xicrons. 7hese data have been Integrated over the solar asPeetrum; the
results are listed In Table 1.1.
Wooden embroidary riqs 5-incaes in diameter were wed to hold the cloth
samples. All cloth samples dere oven Jird at 1059C for 24 hours and then
2
cooled and r-onditioned in desiccators containing one of three items: (1)
indicating silica gel, (2) saturated sodium nitrate solution (65-66% relative
humidity at 15-300 C), and (3) saturated ammonium chloride solution (79.5%
relative humidity at 20-300C).
Table 1.1
OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF CLOT4S (INTBGRATED VALUE OVER SOLAR SPBCIRL'A)
Code No. Designated Color Reflectance Absomptance Transmittance*
QM-4 White with O.C 0.67 0.19 0.14
QM-5-65 Light gray with C1C 0.56 0.37 0.07
Q,.-6-40 Medium gray with C.C 0,50 0.47 0.03
QM-7-22 Dark gray with CMC 0.22 0.78 0
QM .8-12 Black with CNC 0.11 0.89 .0
QN-9-7 Deep black with CMC 0.09 0.91 0
•tN.3 Olive green 107 0.18 0.79 0.03'
C. SCLAR FtRLU.CB
The MIT Solat Fu-n-.e (5, 9,.10, 11) was used as the source of high
intensity radiation. It.tensity up to 6 cal/cma-sec. over a 5 cz a target
arep was obtainable with a clear sky.
D. T3M PERA%.RE MI-ASUREtr'NT
A four channel 150-1500 series Sanborn recorder equipped with "low-level"
preamplifiers was used to record the outputs of thermocoutples. The recorder
has a maximum sensitivity of IOCpv per cm (or approximately 2.50C for copper-
constantan thermocouples). The time constant is 0.03 sec.
Since the cloths were made from the same white 9 ox. cotton sateenstock, and it is unlikely that a simple dyeing process would changethe geometry of the fibers, it is reasonable to assume that thecloth construction provides complete geometrical blockage of theincident light, and that the transmittance depends on the degree ofopacity of the individual cloth fibers. These transmittance valuesshould therefore be regarded not as due to direct transmittancethrough holes but to diathermancy of the cloths.
3
III, PR.OCEURE
Cloth samples were prepared several days in advance and kept in their
respective desiccators until testing time. Then the sample was quickly
transferred from the desiccator to a constant humidity box attached on the
solar furnace. The constant humidity box was kept under the same condition
as the desiccator. Constant temperature was maintained in the box with
an air blower and a thermoregulatcr. After the skin simulant was placed
behind the sample, the box was closed and the air blower was allowed to
contitiue blowing for 10-15 minutes to insure constant temperature and
relative humidity in thea box. The air blower was stopped during the exposure
of the samplc to the addiation. "the sample was exposed for one to 30
seconds to the high intensity radiation ranging from 0.3 to 6.0 cal/cm2 -sec.
The length e; the exposure was controlled by a timing device which opened
and closed the diaphragm shutter. The intensity of radiation was regulated
by partially blocking off the primary mirrors of the solar furnace.
IV. EXPEUIMLTAL RESULTS
Experimental data ob ± med on six kinds of dry cloth are presented in
tie following figures in w.ich the normalized temperature rise is plott,.
against the exposure time in seconds on logarithmic papers with the three or
four skin depths as the parameters$ Figure 1.7 combines the result on three
opaque cloths (deco black, black, asid dark gray); Figure 1.8 shows the
result on the medium gray cloth; Figure I.€ shows the result on "e light
gray cloth; and Figure 1.10 shows the result on the white cloth.
The experiments on moist cloth over skin were design"e to study the
effect of the radiation intensity on the coupling effect of moisture transfer
or' heat transfer. Two types of cloths, one black and one white were used.
The effect of moisture transfer on heat transfer can be illustrated
by the following figures, in which the normalized temperature rise of the
first thermocouple in the skin simulant is plotted aFainst the exposure
time, with iitcnity as the paramoter. Figure 1.11 shows the resuLt on thi
opaque cloth and Pig. X12 shows the result on the white cloth. The complete
data may be found in reference MS).
4
V. THEORETICAL - lMlY CLOTH OVER SKIN SIMULANT SYST34
A. THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL
The general assumptions made in the aralysis are as follows. The
system under consit-ration is sketched below:
Air Lkin" Li Space Sinulant ----- "
Cloth
Figure 1.1
DRY CLOTH-AIR GAP-SKIN SDIUIANT SYT3I
1. Heat flow is unidirectional, occurring in the x-direction, from the
cloth through the air space into the skin simulant. The surface of the
cloth is irradiated by square wave radiation. It will be shown later that
the general solution can be applied to radiation of any pulse form.
2. The cloth kkyer "- considered to be a homogeneous solid, For cloths
which show no measurable transmittance (e.g., deep black, black, and dark
gray of the 9 oz. "standard" cotton sateen), radiant energy is absorbed at
the surface of the cloth. For diathermanous cloths, the radiant eaiergy
is assumed to penetrate into the interior of the cloth layer in accordance
with the Beer-Lawbert law:
Ix uI° exp (-yxc)
where Ix * intensity of radiation at a plane distant xc cm from the
irradiated surface.
I 0 intensity of radiation entering the cloth layer, oro
I 0 a(1 - r), cal/cma-sec.I a Inrident intensity of radia•ion.
-ly a extinction coefficient, cm , a characteristic constant of
the cloth mr the particular source of radiation in question.
If the measured "transmittance" of a diathermanous cloth of thickness
L cm is T, then exp(-yL) s T/(l-r), where r is the reflectance of the cloth.
The solution is applied specifically to the 9 ox. "standard" cotton
sateen; it could be equally well be applied to either diathermanous or
direct-transmitting cloths.
3. The physical properties of the cloth layer remin constant through-
out the exposure.
4. Any effects due to moisture and/or chemical reaction are negligible.
5. Heat losses from the front surface of the cloth layer by convection
ant re-radiation are characterized by a single overall heat transfer
coefficient Uo.
6. i!'At transfer from the cloth layer through the air gap to the simulant
is similarly characterized by an overall heat transfer coekficient U1 .
7. The skin simnulant is considered to be a homogeneous opaque solid
of infinite extent in its x-direction.
The validity of these assumptions must first be checked against
experimental data obtainee %, om an equivalent inanimte system. Further.-
more it should be born in mind that such an analysis will be of value ouuy
if the temperature history data can in combination with some postulated
mechanism of burning correlate the in vivo results.
The basic equations for the cloth layer are:
1. Opaque cloth
bT k as T
2. Diathermanous cloth
• , + c "pT IC (,.2)
The equation for the skin is
Cps -3x (1.3)3xS6
6
T1r surface bounda)'y equations are:
1. For opaque cloth
(a) Front surface
Sut ] ".4)
Ia Uo(Txu - T )kc ITI0 0 U(xc=O " surr) a k xc X.WO
(b) Back svrface and skin suri.aceAT•I Ui(T T . -k T
2. For diathermanous cloth
(a) Front surface
k T 1 . aUCT -T )(1.6)c xXCO surr
(b) Back surface and skin surface
"-k ;T + I exp(-YLc) M UU(T - T-)
+ I exp(-yL,) m as T (1.7)
These equations are solved by a finite-difference approximation method
which gives temperature as a function of the following five independent
variables; time, depth, Ui, U0 , and R, a property group. The solution is
expressed as a relation among the following dimentionless groups.kT
1. Tmperat-e group T c * CXoLC
2. Time group go~ • kc (&PC a
3. Depth group X°0 *c
U L(1.8)
4. Surface heat losses group U Co
"\ !7
U L0 0 c,
5. Air gap group Ui jC
4X0
6. T group -
Stated another way, the temperaturc-time-depth relation is a function
of the three other groups.
The details of the solution are given in Appendix 3.
B. GENIAL SOLUTION
The general solution consists of the temperature-time-depth relation as
a function of the following parameters:
1. U0 the dimensionless surface heat loss group0
2. U0 the di.mensionless air gap group
3. I' the physical property ratio group
For opaque cloth, only one set of solutions is needed; for diathermanous
cloth, a technique which uses the weighted mean of three sets of solutions,
each representing radialion absorption at a different plane in the system,
gives results within I to "/a of those obtained by a more rigorous method.
These three sets of solutions are as follow:
1. The case of incident radiant energy absorbed at the exposed cloth
surface,
2. The case of incident radiant energy absorbed at X0 a 0,75, andc
3. The case of incident radiant energy absorbed at the surface of the
skin sinulant.
By taking advantage of the additive nature of the solutions, the
temperature rise at any plane in any diathermanons-cloth problem can be
obtained as the sum of the temperature rises due to assoming that the
total energy absorption is lumped at three planes. The Beer-Lambert law
is used to calceulate absorption in the first hall of the cloth, the second
half, and the skin surface. These quantities are then trested as though
lumped at the front 3urface of the cloth where X O 0, at the plane X 0.75,c S
8
and at the skin surface, where X° 0.
1 1. Application to Other Types of Cloth Including those having Direct
Transmittance
As a corollary to the above additive principle, these three curves
can be -weighted in any fashion according to known distribution rule
of the incident radiation inside the cloth. For cloth having direct trans-
mittarce, an additional proportion of the Curve III solution is added. However,
it must be noted that the solution is based on an opaque skin simulant, hence
it is not applicable to diathermanous skin covered by a single open-weave
cloth layer.
For cloths of different thicknesses and thermal conductivities, the
general solutions are applicable. The only change is in che relationship
between t'.e actual temperature ( C) - time (sec) - depth(ca) and their
dimensionless groups. Thus doubling the thermal conductivity of the cloth
doubles the To, 8g0 , and X scales. Halving the thickness doubles the Toc a
and Zo scales, and quadruples the 0 0 ecale.
The general solutions also allow the prediction of the TO, 80 X°0 datas
at the skin surface, a d other depths where experimental data are not
available.
The following examples illustrate the effects of diathermancy, thickness,
thermal conductivity of the cloth, and the size of air gap and surface heat
losses on the To - 8° - X° relationship in the skin. The solutions arec s
shown in the following figures.
Figures 1.13, 1.14 show AT0 versus A6 at X: U 0, aid X0 0 0.05, 0.45
respectively. The solutions are plotted on Cartesian scale to demonstrate
the effect of diathermancy on the time lag between the initiation of the
exposure and the rise in temperature in the skin. These figures are self-
axplanatory.
Figure 1.15 illustrates the effect of doubling the value of k on thec
To - 0° - X0 relationship. Curves to the right are calculated fer whitec 3
(W4) cloth, which is highly diathermanous, the curves to the left for
opaq*n cloth. The different part kc plays in these two types of cloth is
interesting.
"9
Figure 1.16 illustrates the effect of doubling the thickness; for the
.3ame two types of cloth. It is seen that the variation in !thickness has
a much greater effect than thermal conductivity variation on the To - 0 -XC s
relationship.
Pigure 1.17 illustrates the relative importance of Uai o
TO - 00 - XO) it is seen that, as expected, U 0 is important at relativelyc a 1small 90 and U° becomes important at long e0 values.
C 0 c
2. App4ication to Relaxation Period.
Taking advantage again of the additive nature of the solution, theTP - 0o - XO relationship during the relaxation time, i.e., after the
c 5termination of the radiant source, can be obtained from the general solution
by adding at the terminution time to the general solution, a negative-
radiatAe.- )f the saw intensity.
Figures 1.15, 1.19 show the temperature-time curves at two depth
planes with radiation terminated at various dimensionless times, in the
case of dia thermanous white cloth and black opaque cloth, respectively.
These figures are self-explanatory, and it is interesting to note the time
when various depths of Jy skin reach their maximua temperatures.
3. Application to Non-Square Wave Radiant Source.
Even though the getieral solutions are based on a radiant source of
uniform intensity, solutions to radiant sources of any shape or duration can
he obtained frcom these general solutions. An example is shown in Figure 1.20.
The pulse shape and, duration is that of a 1.46 Megatoa nuclear explosion
(2, 3, M). The procedure is illustrated by the sketch at the lower right
corner of Figure 1.26. Radiation of uniform intensity is added to the
solution in a step-wise fashion until it reaches the maximm intensity, then
negative radiation is added to the solution in the sume way, (shown as
double cross-hatched area) and net radiation received by the system is shown
as the cross-hatched area. The dimensionless temperature rise group
expressed in terms of the maximum intensity, I.., is plotted against
dimensionless time, 400 for various depths in skin as shown in Figure 1.26.C.
In Figure 1.27, the temperature history at a dimensionless skin depth
of 0.05 for the nuclear explosion is compared with that of square wave
10
radiation of the sa,,e energy, delivered in 4.5 and I dimensionless time units.
It is to be noted that the theoretical solution is solved by dividing
the cloth into 6 increments and the modulus, AX02/A49 , is chosen as 2;C C
thus each time increment represents 0.0139 dimensionless tite units wh:ich
in turn is equal to about 0.034 sec. for the 9 oz cotton sateen. If the non-
toniform pulse is to be delivered in a very short time, say 0.1 sec, the present
general solution would only give a very crude approximation of the pulse shape
(i.e., in three time increments). But the situation can be easily improved
by increasing the modulus or by decreasing the size of each increment.
C. DISCUSSION OF REULMS
I. Properties of the Cloth and Skin Simulant
For the optical properties of the cotton sateen cloth tike values listed
in Table 1.1 have been used in the evaluation of exPeriments as well as in
the calculations.
Literature values for the specific heat of cotton fabrics vary between
0.32 (7) and 0.35 cal/gm-q, (2). A value of 0.34 cal/gm0 C was used in the
calculations.
In determining the heat conductivity of cloth by the conventi-nn' s+tcadv-
state method, it is difficult to assign a proper effective thickness to the
cloth in a situation involving both radiation and conductive heat transfer.
A similar problem is posed Lt. the measurement of density. These difficulties
are avoided by combining the thickness term with both the density and thermal
conductivity. For the former, a value of (pL)c a 0.0273 * 2% gm/cma was
measured by a method described in (4). The group (k/L)c bas to be estimated
and improved by a trial-and-error method also explained in (4), which uses an
adjustment of theoretical to experimental temperature responses. This method
should give a better approximation of kc for our purposes than the steady-
state method. However, it presupposes correct values of the heat transfer
coefficients U0 and UP which are not known precisely. Therefore the influence
of a possible error in k will have to be tested (see V, C, 2).
The value of (k/L) for the 9 OZ standard cotton sateen was determined
to be around 3.76 x 10 cal/cm sec°C. If L is taken as 0.043 cm (measuredc
11
with a micro-t:ter), then the above value corresponds to k - 1.62 x 10-4
cal/cm sec C, which is close to the value kc a 1.5 x 10 cal/cm sec C indicated
by other literature.
For the skin simulant (no. 10) used in the experiments the values-3 0 -4k 3 1.035 x 10 cal/cm sec C and (kCp)s is 8.65 x 10 cal*/cmnsec°Ca were
measured. These differ slightly from the properties of average white skin-3
agreed upon at an AFSWP conference (1), which are ks a 1.065 x 10- C4l/ca sec C
az (]kta) 8.5 x 10-4 cala/cm'sec°0Ca.
2. Comparison of the Theoretical Analysis with the Experimental Data
on the Dry Cloth - Air Gap - Skin Simulant System
Using the physical properties mentioned above, the experimental data
(figures 1.7 - 1.10) are transformed into their dimensionless form and replotted
in Figures 1.73 - 1.23, ior ccmparison with two sets of theoretical results.
The dotted lines are based on U0 • 0.1 and U? - 2.0 (corresponding to a0 1 -4
surface heat transfer coefficient U° = 376 x 10 cal/cm~sec°C and an air-4 0
gap of width 0.008 ca with an air conductivity of 0.6 x 10 cal/cm see C).
The solid lines represent Uo a 0.2 ard U0 a 5.0.
The theoretical solution can be expected .o be influenced by the heat
transfer coefficients, the ti.-.mal conductivity of cloth, the transmittance
and residual moisture of cloth.
Figures 1.20 - 1.23 show that the effect of the temperature rise in the
skin simulant of changing the assumed valles of U 0 and U0 decreases with0 i
rizirn diAthermancy, as can be expected fron the fact that the contribution
of conduction to the heat transfer through the cloth dWAnishes.
For the diathermanous cloth, the agreement with the range o& the two
sets of calculations is quite good. The values for the opaque cloth, however,
are better approximated by the solid curves than the dotted ones at short
exposure times. The apparent necessity of assigning higher values to the
heat transfer coefficients than those representing a stagnant air layer and
natural convection at the front surface (case of U° a 0.1 and Uoa 2.0)
(McAdams, 14), may be explained by the Lact that under rapid transient heating
tte transid-t heat transfer coefficients can be considerably higher than the
values o'tained under steady-state conditions (8, 13, 18). in additions
12
movement of air in the pores of the cloth under a high temperature gradient
may also contribute to the effective heat transfer coefficient.
Further possible influences are shown by Figures 1.20 - 1.24. Assumption
of a small transmittance of the opaque cloth (although not revealed by
spectrometer measurements) say raise the temperature response of the skin
simulant considerably at low exposure times (Figure 1.20). A similar effect
can be caused by a low residual moisture content of the "dry" cloth, whose
desorption, migration and subsequent condensation on the surface of the
relatively cool skin simulant will contribute to the energy transport.
Figure 1.24 illustrates the variation due to 1.8% residual moisture content,
calculated according to the moist cloth theory.
Last, the effect of a variation in the thermal conductivity of the cloth
has been studied. In Figure 1.25 (k/L) is raised by 30% over the valuec
previously used. Here the dimensionless heat transfer cz'efficients are left
constant (at 0.1 and 2.0), which implies that their dimensional equivalents
U° and UP. too, are increased by 30% over their original values for naturalconvection and a stagnant air gap. This latter fact alone accounts for arise in temperature. Thus if there is a contribution on (kL)c to the
temperature rise at al. it must be rather small.
To reveal the influence of (k/L)c further, some experiments have been
carried out with a cylindrical skin simulant placed at a distance of 0.038 ca
behind the cloth. These tests clearly indicate that the heat transfer through
the stagnant air sp.ce in our sys tem is much higher than can be predicted byan increased thermal conductivity in conjut.'tion with the stagnant-air value
o0 Ui.
Summarizing, it may be asid that while slight effects may be due to
transmittance and residual moisture in the dry cloth as well as its thermal
conductivity, they appear unlikely. The major influence on the theoretical
temperature response of the system is most probably effected by the choice
of proper heat transfer coefficients. It seems necessary to base the
theoretical solution on values of U and Ui higher than those related to
steady-state natural convection and a stagnant air space. A rigorous
confirmation of this would require further experimental investigation.
13
VI. THEORETICAL - MOIST CLO'Th OVER SKIN STMULANT SYSTEM
A. THE MATIII•4ATICAL MODEL
Based on the assumption that a linear relationship exists between the
physical properties of the cloth fibers and that of water, an attempt was
made to correlate the moist cloth data with the theoretical solution for
the dry cloth-skin system using the calculated "pseudo" physical properties.
The calculated theoretical tmperature history was for lower than the experimental
data. This suggested that the Moisture in the cloth vaporized when exposed to
high intensity radiatiou with part of the water vapor penetrating through the
air gap and condensing on the cold skin simulant surface, thus resulting in
a high temperature rise. A successful mathematical model must, therefoie
include the effect of moisture transport on the heat transfer process. *ur
proposed model assumes the following:
1. Mass transfer of moisture is caused by the molecular diffusion rd
bulk flow of vapor through the gas voids surrounding the cloth fibers, out
not by liquid diffusion on the surface of or through pores in the clot., fibers.
2. The local moisture content (called "regaine in textile technol ,gy)
of the cloth is at all tiien in equilibrium with the partial pressure .1
water vapor at the temperatL.e of the local gas id the voids, i.e., th.':,-..
of equilibration is much faster than the vapor diffusion process.
3. Sensible heat transfer in the vapor phase is negligible compared
with the heat conduction through the cloth and with the heat effects of
adsorption and desorption of water on the cloth fiber.
4. The volume of air flowing through the cloth is negligible compared
with that of the water vapor due to desorption and adsorption of waRsr to
and from the cloth fiber, ie., air can be considered as a stagnnt layer
through which water vapor diffuses.
5. Other assumptions are the same as those for the dry cloth problem. An
energy balance around a differential element of the cloth layer givest
k-T (I-f ) a am (2.1)
14
or
6T amr(- "2. a)
where Pc a Po(I - f) * bulk density of cloth, and the continuity equation for
water can be written as:
gD •Y1l= PC a ~
rx[ (I -?i1 3 'Ti] NJ 3M W (2.2)
Since the bulk flow due to a total pressure gradient is neglected in
this model, the total pressure is assumed to be constant at I atm., and the
mole fraction of water vapor, yI can be replaced by the fractional partial
pressure p/W. Aquation (2.2) can be written ass
a PC3M (2.2a)
where
(I - -1y IT
p m ass density of the gas phase, pgm/cm
A third relationship can be outained from assumption (2), thus
M ( 0 (T,p)
and
(i*Ip -I (r ~ (2..3)
Substituting (2.3) into (2.1a) ana (2.2a),e liminating bp/b@ from the twoequations and making the assumption that I T • we obtain,
3? k a*T? Ffm' s (2.4
is
andX am
c> J 0 " [- T J a2T (2.5)
Equations (2.4) and (2.5) represent the two equations describing the heat
and .'=s5 transfer in the cloth layer.
For the skin simulant, we have,
aT k aSTG"C . •' (2.4a)
where the subscript s denotes skin simulant.
The bounds-,! conditions ares
(1) At the front surface of the cloth:
(a) L10 (p =0 -Psurr afD~" ac x1 u (2.6)(.,'(b) 10 - U (T ~ ~Ts _cT " (3.7)
(2) In the air gap bet .en the cloth and the skin s3aulant, neglecting
the heat capacity of the air:
(a) Material balance:
K i(Pxc.Lc pX6. 0) - 4-' D alealI (2.5)
(b) Energy balances
- T- K (p -p
cj xz.L i XCULg x~sO
U ( . - ) -(T(p p )
a .. (2.,9)
16
• okI xs7
B. METHOD OF SOLUTION
1. Dimersionless Formulation of the Basic Equations
Unlike the case of the dry cloth-skin system, the moist-clkth problem
does not lend itself to a generalized solution in dimensionless form. Not
only is its solution non-linear with respect to irradiation intensity, but
a general formulation would also require analytical expression of the
hygroscopic equilibrium behavior of the cloth, so far only available in
tabulated form. To aescribe this equilibrium, as will an the water vapor
pressure curve, a number of dimensionless parameters would have to be
introduced btsides those needed for the heat and mass transfer coefficients,
diffusivity, and the surrounding conditions.
The solution method developed is therefore not general, but is specific
with resaect to water vapor as the vaporizable component, the initialmoisture content, the initial temperature aid the irradiation intensity;
i.e., the funtions relating vapor pressure and moisture content are dealt
with in absolute terms. Nevertheless, the calculations are carried out indimensionless form, which not only provides an organizational aid but also
alsows for examinat~on of the degree of nonlinearity as exhibited by the
results.
The transformation groups for time, space, temperature, pressure and
the transfer and diffusion, coefficients are listed below:
To a dimansionless temperature group.oc
X 0 --. dimensionless distance $roup, measured from thec front surface of the cloth.
0 x kxs. . A . E dimensionless skin-depth group.
Lc k
0a k cO dimensionless time group.
UoL~U0 .• -.s surface convective and radiant heat losses group.0 kc
17
/
UO cU0 k convective heat transfer through air gap group.cT C property-ratio group.
0 pXpO a - ZA dimensionless partial water vapor pressure group.
PO ,(P is a convenient base pressure value, takentoe bOO,. Psutr the equilibrita partial pressureof water vapor at time sero.)
MoPo10 0 0 " surface heat losses group due to moisture removal.
0
M1i~o10 - heat transfer group due to moisture transfer through
0 th sair gap,
-- 02 heat transfer group due to moisture diffusion.LCII
Using the above transformations, the differential equations (2.4, 2.4a, 2.5)
become:
(a) For the cloth layer:
C z
ago axos aC C
utlre
D.fD°
LWDLC O£
(r~ F)T 'PADOLcCc I° I ,MIT")
C 0 lFp T Cc (•)T J
(b) For the skin:
neo AxoVS
The boundary conditions (2.6, 2.. •.9) are transforet• into:
(a) At the outer stwface of the cloth:
Mass flux: P = O (f(D°Ao)) " o x= (2.6)'10.0 0 x0 Ixu
C cj C
Energy flux: 1 -I U- To T (2.7)'0" O a X o .0
(W) In the air gaps
Mass fIux: p0 PO .Xfo(DO,•) .* ] (2.8)t.0- 1 0.0o azj'x0e
Energy f lu - - o
3-0cl -0 I -1 P 0 1 4-0
U O U TP )Tr(Po K )
" ' - X°=O .1 X.0-0
zJ 80. 0
2. Difference Auations and Solution Algorithm
(a) Finite difference notation
In order to solve the system (2.490 2,4&'9 2.5), it is rewritten I.n the
form of finite-difference equations. The variables involved now are lumpedquantities, their values being assigned to discrete points in space and time,
separated by intervals AX° (cloth), ALs (skin) and A 00 (Figure 2.1). The
subscripts J and n denote, respectively, a point in space and tim. In
particular, the subscript n denotes "present time": n-1 refers to "past time",
/
arn n*1 to "future time".
1 ± T TkII I I I1 I I701 T2 T0 ý6 TS010
P1 P2 3 P4 5 P6 7 PS I ISI I I i i I I II I I I I ,l i I Ii
I I I I I g I I ,I I j I i I I a
•z I I, .-.. •
12 , I I i aiX1 1 1 2 5 0
Figure 2.1
SLAB DITIlION FOR MOIST CLTH-SKIN SI•UANT SYSTBi
The parti•al derivatives, e r. of t.le temperature diet, ibution, in finitedifference notation take the following fort:
T. T 0 - 2T 0 + TobaTPI J-1*, a J+jIn
xo o 0 (AO)a80 • g AST°
abbr.: ...4a. n T (2.10)(A)om xxJ, n
c
_oj0 T0 n o -T 0 . ,
be 0 x 0 y 0 Ago ATJ uc n br ~ m (2.110 0 ~ ab A 0 OrTj~f
Thus, the governing difference equations are (with the abbreviations intro-
duced above):
20
(1) For the cloth layer:
- . - *B (2.4+)"
Al' - - (2.5)"ago (•3)a1, (4,•t`)s
C0 C
(2) For the skins
and the boundary conditions become:
(-.) itAhe front surface of the cloths
0A' a1Mass flux: P 0 -(f(D°/ic 0 )) Apo (2,6)"
Heat flux: I -U 0 To m 7'0 (2.7)"0 xcSO - 0 (x0mo
(2) In the air IPP.
Mass flux p 0 - P 0o -(f(D /L)) . (2.8)-0. 3k.0 • x 0.01 20)
or, if one assumes condensation to take place to the plane 1/2 AZý above the
skin surface and accordingly reduces the diffusional resistance across the
air gap (l/X 0) by that through hialt a skin ircrements
F0 •PO ( (f(DK (2.Sa)"
Where
' .1 2
PO, . P0 in the 6-alice model of Figure 2.1.X80 X: /2 9L
0 0
21
12
Ax00
Hea flp 7P- ((P9)
8 x x.o (2.9)
(b) Backward difference method
In solving difference equations the structure of the computing algorithm
as well as the stability arnd accuracy of the solution depend on the choice
of subscripts assigned to each of the deriwatives. For example, in the case
of the J~eat conduction equation,
taking the second derivative in space at present time results in the "explicit"
for mulationr
Ju~ 'j~n J+l.n * Jn+1 i.E
of To at time n Is known.
If instead one chooses to take the second derivative at future time,
one arrives at the so-called "backward difference" eqmtions
To? .TO 00 Tjullm+l JIn+l +Tj+l.n~l lpJ.n~l TJ.n
which at each point (J,n~l) presents the three unknowia Tjel.ln., T" n÷2,
T and is also called "implicit". 'TJ•l,n.J.
Besides these methods, there are others involving both present and
future time values in the evaluation of the next distribution (18). The
formulation mentioned first is explicit in that the single unknown quantity
22
at each point (J,n) is readily obtainable. However, this method is known to
possess a restriction on the solut.on stability. The second, backward
difference formulation with three apknowns at (J,n) requires setting up a
system of as many simultaneous equations as there are space points. Since
the equations deal with subsequent spa'e points, the unknowns appear in
advancing positions and thus form a "tridiagonal set of equations which can
be solved by recursion after application of the boundary conditions. This
procedure entails more computational work than the explicit method, but in the
case of the heat conduction equation it is known to produce an unc.-ditionally
stable splution. A backward difference method was chosen, ton, to solve the
problem presented by equations (2.4", 2,4a, 2.5"). An investigation ofthe stability of the particular algorithm used has been carried out aid is
described in chapter VI, B, 5.
Whenever one of the equations is used to calculate implicitly the distri-
bution of either var.bI*.Atluture tb* (subscript n~l), the distributionof the other variable is its last known distribution. Furthermore, the
two equations are used alterrstingly in a pair of time steps, such that in thefirst step one first selves foe T, then for P, and in the second step, first
for P, then for T.
a. Solve (2.4)" and (2.4a for for all Jg and P,0 knownJnnl kno Jwb. Solve (2.5)" for PO for all J; To anj P, known
Jn2J.
d. Solve (2.4)" an] 2.4a)" for To foe all J; 1 Tno and Pn0 known
(2.12)
then replace n by n.2.
Details of the computing algorithm are described in Appendix C.
The .jain difference in solving for the tmperature or pressure distri.-
bution is that the coefficients U awd D in equation (2.5)', are dependent
on temperature and pressure. their present tmae values are determined at
each time step preceding the solution of the equation set. This is done bymeans of a double interpolation (with entricA T and p) of tabulated values
23
f or (OM/WT)p and (Bp/aT)M, which are based on equilibrium data fco moist cloth
obtained by Urquhart and Williams (22).
3. Remarks on the Boundary Conditions and Variable Water Vapor Diffusivity
(a) Moisture condensation of the skin surface
The boundary condition (2.8)" relates the mass transfer at the innerocloth surface to the vapor diffusion through the air gap. In it, ? s0 is
the water vapor pressure at the skin surface, or, more precisely, the saturated
vapor pressure at the temperature of the skin surface, since the skin is
taken to have no absorptivity for moisture. In calculating the pressure
distribution, the above relation is used first, implying the assumption
that there is condensed Moisture on the skin. If this assumption is incorrect,
(as revealed by a test of the pressure gradient at the air gap and a record
of the moistnr- condensed), the pressure calculation is repeated once, with
a simpler boundary condition stating that the moisture flux through the inner
cloth surface is rerot
P, a P8 (in the 6-slice model of Figure 2.1)
A distinction has to be made in this context between the phases b and c of the
alternating scheme (2.12), a. n.iugh both phases -apply the same basic eqi÷'-.-z,
In phase b, the skin surface temperature at "future time" T-OO0 Itis0, n~liS known and thus also P o, .. In phase c, when n+2 means future time,
this is not true. The "plesent time" value T;s.Oa.n1l is therefore chosen as
a trial value. If the ensuing calculation of teperatures in phase d does
not confirm it closely enough, an improved value for the skin surface temperature
is chosen and phases c and d are repeated until convergemce is achieved.
(b) Treatment of dry cloth slices
At sufficiently high irradiation intensity, the evapocation of water
and the moisture flow to the cooler interior of the system will eventually
cause parts of the cloth to become dry, starting from the outer surface. A
slice of the cloth is called dry when either its temperature rises above
some fixed level (i.e., 180°C) or the relative humidity in it drnps below
a minimum (0%). The dry slices are now excluded from the pressure calculation
based on the moistuts equilibrium relationship. If, however, the equation
24
. , , . . . ' ,
for the temperature calculation (2.4)" is to remain unaltered, some meaningful,
if very low, pressure'values must ae assigned to the "dry" slices. The storage
capacity of these slices for moisture can be considered negligible as long as
they stay "dry". Therefore at these points the pressure values should not
contribute to the temperature response as exp~ressed by equations (2.4)"; the
second derivative of pressure may be co-sidered to be zero, which turns these
equations into pure heat conduction equations. In other words, the pressure
profile is to .have a linear section, which in equivalent to stating that
the values in question are only determined by the diffusion from the known
vapor pressure in the first moist slice to the outside surface,
If m is the number of dry cloth slices, then P1 and P+ 2 0 re related by
a modification of the boundary condition (2.6) which takes into account the
lengthe.e.1 path of diffusion to the boundary:
No dry slices:
2fD 0 K 0(26)"P*l 2 2fD .0 c 2.)0
0 c
m slices dry:
2f D o to -[ Ax 0Pol P - 0 0pO =~ Zf. -1 € (2.6)"
a 2fD + (2m + 1x 0 AzX
0
(See Pigure 2.2 below)
Accordingly, the pressures in the "dry" part of the cloth are found by
d interpolation.
24a
I.,
dry dry
, I I° . !
IlD c . Ic
C CO
Figure 2.2
(c) The diffuslvit7" Of water vapor theough air is given n.• a funtlton of
temper~t tur eST 3/2
The effective coefficient .ef .•..ffusion lD' can be calculated f~rom 9 :l4ii•
an average temperatwre (e.g., 5O°C)a
17" vav....(a.l3)(1 - iT)""
where £ i~s the tortuosit.• k'actct.
The prOgram allows fct the use of either a fixed value of D" or a
variable one, to 1w determined from the local vapor pressure and temperature
at each cloth slice and at each ti~e. step.
4. Sumasry of the Computer Program
(a) Input
The program requires four groups of input data. The first type of data
describes the moisture-temperature-water vapor pressure relationship for the
25
I't
moist cloth. The functions
a)* f(T,p)
and
( f(Tp)
arm tables with entries T and p. Their values are also listed in Table G.2.
They are based on original data obtained by Urquhart and Williams, (22), which
are compiled in (5).
"The second group of data contains constants describing the properties of
.,e physical system:
U0
i ufD° "
o omax
(L/k)A
(-/k)c
Tcrit(kQp)€
The third group comprises constants referring to the properties of the
mathematical modtl :
A tolerance for the rial value of the skin surfact temperature rise
MA -(AX)
4X;
4x0
The number of double time steps
26
An indicator for constant or variable water vapor diffusivity
The number of single time steps between printouts
The number of cloth slices
A time mark for optional change of M
An alternate value for hA
Last, a number of parameters define "experimental" conditions, namely the
surrounding temperature and relative humidity, the irradiation intensity, its
duration and pulse shape:
Psurr
Ts-rr
An indicator for the type of irradiation pulse shape
I
The pulse width
The trapezoidal pulse shape parameter
(b) Output
2hw results of computations are presented ass
The dimension)et. temperature distribution. in and at the cloth andskin simulant
The dimensionless pressure distribution in and at the cloth
as functions of dimensionless time.
As a by-product, the values of the variable coefficients in equation (2.5)'
are given as well as measures for the moisture loss due to evaporation at
the cloth surface and condensation on the skin simulant.
A record of the number of cloth slices having dried out is kept, and
optionally the value of ihe maximum ctitic-l enthalpy assumed by the skin
is indicated.
(c) Program description
A common experience with any complete description of a s~seable computer
program is that it tends to become as involved as the program itself appears
at first glance. It is hoped, however, that the computing process is explained
sufficiently by the description of the algorithm which forms the basic part
27
, , '"" I " II
of the program (Appendix C) along with diagrams showing the flow of control
through its mainportions, a commentary on the purpose of the subroutines
used and the program listings, all of which are included in Appendix E.
The program in form of symbolic and binary cards may be obtained upon request
from the files of the Fuels Research Laborptory, Chemical Engineering Department,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge 39, Massachusetts.
S. SlIbility
A main distinction between the formulation of a differential equation
in analytical or finite-difference terms arises from toe fact that the latter
formulation may be satisfied not only by one true solution but also by a
number of so-called extraneous solutions contributing to the total calculated
function. If these are not to disturb the solution of the problem, the
condition t.w be imposed on. them is that their amplitudes decay with time,
i.e., that values of an extraneous solution u at a space point i at successive
time steps n and n*l have an amplitude ratio or growth factor • • 1.
S Iultn
This is the condition of stability of the solution process.
Whether a finite-differen4e method has the property of (unconditional
or conditional) stability is determined by the structure of the particular
computing algorithm chosen (see VI, B, 2), in conjunction with the coefficients
of the differential equations. An investigation of the stability problem
associated with the alternating explicit-implicit scheme used for the moist
cloth-skin simulant system follow below *. It results in a simple criterion
for stability which is dependent only on the four coefficients of the equation
sys tem.
In the derivatioths below, a nomenclature exclusive to this chapter ix
used$ T, P and the coefficients X, L. •, I only retain their meaning. The
superscripts denoting "dimensionless' are dropped, aid for the derivatives,
the abbrevia tioia (2.10, 2.11) of chapter VI, 3, 2 are used.
SThis study was done with the kind assistance of Professor P. L. Thibault
Brian, Department of Chemical Engineetring, M.I.T.
2S
Temporarily, the system is assumed to be linear, i.e., to posses$ constantcoefficients T, g, E, CD. The eqmtions in question are
Ta A'Txx * 3( (3.1)
Va - 6T *x 5P x(3.2)
Assuming T and P to conasist of separable functions.
T (• () f (3.3)
P(X9,Z)f s (s) (3.4)
the system becomes:
Xf • (r"/r) * I (s"/r) a f' (3.5)
Ef • (ru/s) * *g (s-/s) a g' (3.6)
If the variables are truly separated, then the functions
(r"/r), . ',s),W("'r), an (s"Is)
must be iulependent of x.
Setting (rt/r) a - i*•a ). we find
(x) a(x) (3.7)
we now solve foa f(9) and '(9),
Af(o) *4() () (3.8)
*f(9) &Ag (9) s 5(O) (3.9)
Prom (3.10)
f'(e) " ) (6)_
( U - (3,10)
(g)
29
Subatiuting into (3.9) we find:
Therefore,
ith ((C) - Clel1 0 + C * 2 9
with
Analogously, the solution f•,e,( is.
€() ceiA1 I ce'20
3 4@The total solutij then iLe,
ST " 9 (40erl + OPA2 )(cce mk: * c6 ain mkx) (3.13)
" (c 3 Olf * C 4 eno)(c cOS *kx * c &an uz) (3,13)
T and P are wave functions in distance, Their "growth" with tive depends onthe four coefficients as follows
if iv > T and P decoy with timeiLf B• - rc T and P see independent ofr tint
t iD < T and P increase with tineSince only the first case Is pbYsically Ieaningful, a finite-differenceprocedure to solve for T and P moat also provide solutions that decay with
time,
We deflito, o?
TJon T (xaJ*4x, #".AO)
J'n a P(x*eJeAx, $".,a)
30
In the finite-difference notation, we introduce as usual,
r" a r J.1 - 2rj * rj1
It follows, for the functions introduced in (3.5, 3.6)
(r"/r) ie(J-l )Ax .2 e JAx + *e(J+l)Ax
*i0JAx
(r"/r) eiuz - 2 + eihx u -4sin*((•i,2) (3.14)
and likewise,
(r"/r), (re/8), We/0), (50/4) a-4sina(w•/2)
Introducing the abbreviations,
c o - 4i.sae( /)
41-A . sing(uAX/Z)y 4(Ax) *p - -4i A. . si 1n(s•x/2)
(AX)PI- 4- sin*(uAx)
a - - 4D------ . sin(w•)
(As )o
we rewite. the equation system in the sequence to te used for its solution
(see V1. 3, 2):
" an~l " i n .1 anl"f 31a
" "- 2+l ' Snnl "- m (3,16b)
"i 0+*1 " 6gn*2 a $"*a " -n*l (3,16c)
" "it n,2- P"v*23 0 lfn2 -" 3nl (3,16d)
This represents a double time step scheme in the second halt of which the
sequence of operations is inverted (tihu "alternating"). We are Interested
31
in determining its behavior over one entire double time step, i.e., in finding
a relation between fn+2 and fn and likewise between gn+2 and gn*
From (3.16a) is extracted,
f * fn - Oan (3.17)
Substituting this into (3.16b) yields,
Gn+l (1 ; + ÷I +) " n?()"n (3.+))
Substituting these two expressions into (3.16c) results in
- y(2 + *)fn - (6 * l)*(s + )gn+2
y(2 8) 1 + a3 gn 0 (3,19)
and into (3.1l6) in
(I # 0*f2 - fa (I ÷ l ))*n+2 + g ga 0 (3.20)
Having elimenated all functirno values at time n.l, we now actually consider
the double time step as one pe.,od, rewirting the last equations.
-Y(2 + S)f - ( * 1)(6 * 1)g*+l
+ P [ (2 + 6) * I + ,g 0 (3.19s)
(l. )f f -f , (l*S)0g *g 5 0 (3.20a)
Next a relation is to be found foc the time behavior of one of the
solutions, i.o., '0)) expressed as a growth factor
Thus the functions f are to be eliminated first; this is done most easily
by substituting f from (3.19s) into (3.20s), hereafter also fn 1 from the
32
same equation, having increased the index by 1. The result is,
(1 + M)"(1 -* - I Ivo)8 + Oy( 2 + 6)(2 * 6) (+ U* 8)) +"U" " "c". (3.21)
The stability condition . the function g is
It is not necessary to go through the same derivation to find a corresponding
relation for the growth factors associated with the function f. Consider the
double time step to go from n*l to n+3, comprising the solution of equations
(3.16c,d), i.e., n+l to n+2, followed by that of iquations (3.16a,b), i0e.,
n+2 t- n+3.
"- a -fngl "On f f
" n Yfnl - 8n~l a gn*l - In origiual double stepa - 6*
"- YfnUl " a8n+2 * gn2 n Suez n/(2.12)
" 6n.2 " •.2 • *3 " nol new double step
" n t'hn3 " OgnU2 n fn+3 " fn*2 n+1 "n+3
" Yfn+3 - Og n+? a g n÷3 -"n+3
If for the moment we replace
Tby PP byTtby P'*by 40*by Y''r byA'
f by g*g by f*
then the system nel to n*3 is formally identical with the original one. There-
fore we know fram the foregoing discussion the quantities a*, b', c* that will
33
7r
be associateo with the equation
g" ,*." .• c" -Og (3.2k)
go
£
or because of the r eplacement definition
f fe!** re÷ eb*2 c' 0 (3.22a)
where a*, b*, c* are expressed in terms of a* ... 8*" Resubstituting S* G S
etc., we obtain the -erms in (3.200) in terms of the original quantities 1 .0# 0,
only to find that they are identical with those in the growth factor relation
(3.19) far g. "his could be expected from the fact that the equation system
and the alglrithn far its solution are symmetric with respect to T and P
(or f and g).
It remains to be seen under what conditions the stability criterion,
identical for f and g, is satisfied, i.e.,
_ 5 1 where at * bt c • 0 from equation (3.21)
This can be transformed as i1,.ows:
Ii *-(b/2a) . t < 12
resulting in
-c•a * b
Using these terms as expressed in (3.21) we have,
- 1:S (1 *Co)sCl * G)- (-*( O)X
-Oy(2 * S)(2 * 6) a ( *)
From this fol•lo:
34
-1 ; (1 * 26 * ,)(l + 28 60) - (I + 26 G*) - +y(• * ,)(2 0 8)
- (1 * 26 * 8 '
or
O < (2M * 2 )(32 * 6 S ) G Py(2 6 6)(2 + 8)
which reduces to
Thus the condition of stability is satisfied whenever • / KS . 1.
So far, we have assumed the coefficients X, 9, U, and D to be constant.
Since in fact d and I are evaluated anew at each time step by table inter-
polation, and N can be either variable or held constant, one would have to
ascertain -.hat, their values always fulfill the stability condition. A
special subroutine was therefore written into an intermediate version of
the computer program to test the criterion, which indeed was never violated
during computations.
6. Conversence
The question of co vwrgenct of th* finite difference solution method
bears'upon two aspects of che problem:
(a) Ultimate uniqueness of the finite difference solution
(b) Bmpnse of machine time versus accuracy
One is interested in determining the convergence of the finite-difference
solution, wnem the difference net is refined, to the "true solution" that
satisfies the finite difef~ence system. (The true response of the physical
system, as obtained experimentally, is valuable foe comparison but not
decisive for the consideration of convergence, since the mathematical
abstraction implies simplifying assumptions). Unfortunately, no analytical
solution of the system in question is available by which the accuracy of
the calculated one could be determined. All one may ask for it ultimate
convergence of the solution to a unique result, when finer steps in time and
3S
space are taken. In the absence of general methods for r3tablishing such
behavior for coupled equations with coefficierts depending on the response
functions, a somewhat experimental approach was used to investigate it.
If one expresses the terms occurring in the finite difference equations
in Taylor series forms, then the total truncation error for the two functions
To and Po comprises terms containing AS0 , (4€)* and (AX)*. It may be
expected that the truncation error diqitiishes as these factors are reduced,
as it does in simplec, linear systems so long as the coudition for stability
is obeyed. This latter requirement is in fact fulfilled by our system.
In order to observe convergence rather than prove it rigorously, calcul- L
lations have been carried out to test the influence of different values of
the intervals t Alto and A60. First, the resulting response curves are
expected to appear in the same sequence as the zspective values of A1°C ps
and/or A0°. Second, the' rate of change of these curves Is expected to
become smaller as successively smaller finite differences are used, i.e.,
they should converge against a final function. Figures 2.7a,b illustrate
the results of these calculations, i.e., the temperature response of the
skin obtained at constant irradiation intensities of I s 0.5 and
1.0 cal/cmssec and dimensionless step widths,
1 =/2, 1/6 and 1/18,C
* 1/10, 1/30, 1/90 (resp.)
A u 0.0031 ... 0.25
For comparison, the temperature responses of the cloth are also depicted
for the case of Ieas * 0.5 cal/cmasec, (Figure 2.7c).
Inspection of the calculated results shows that the curves for the skin
temperature lie in the expected order with respect to each other. (Note
that the sequence my be ascending or descending a" the truncation error
my change its siga with time).
A similar behavior was observed for the cloth temperatures, at least
over a time range until so a 2.0 (Figure 2.7c).
Furthermore, it appears that successive refinement of £1l: a and
36
I
A0O results in a progressively smaller variation of the curves. For Ioa.
0.5 cal/cm2 sec the case of AX0 U 1/1 was not computed. At I a 1.0 cal/camsecc
however, the ref inement of interv'als in fact leads to convergence in that
the response obtained with Ae a 1/6 and AGO * 0.00556 very precisely repro-c
duces that obtained with AZ0 a 1/18 and AGO • 0.0031, within the low time
range until &0 a 1.0.
The agreement found from these trial calculations certainly has to be
taken cum grano salis. In particular, the comparison with the case of finest
"step widths ha not been carried out over a very large range of time, first
since this alone would have required excessive amoints of machine time, and
second, because one can hardly expect a perfect reproduction over such a
range from a system with slight built-in discontinuities, such as the effect
of cloth slices drying out. (The approximative treatment of those cloth
slices, which might introduce slight deviations, mast make itself felt more
strongly in the 18-slice model than with 2 or 6 slices, simply since the
condition applies to a larger number of such slices as time goes on).
For practival purposes one has to mtae a comparison between the accuracy
of the computed solution and the e xpen&e of machine time required to obtain
it&, The amount of comp•t. time used per time step strongly depends on the
fineness of the slices into which the continuum Is conceptually divided,
and on the length of time intervals, since the former affects the size of
the equation system to be solved, while the latter is imediately related
to the progression on the real time scale. The attempt at finding experimentally
the degree to which a somewhat "unique " or final solution is gained by
refining the spsae-time mosh leads one to believe that the 2-slice model
does not provife sufficient accuracy, producing deviations of up to 101
from the 6-slice case. On the other hand, not much accuracy Is gained by
preferring 18-alJcea over 6. As far as computer time Is concerned, this is
a fortunate balance. The actual amounts of computer time required per second
of real time are given in Appendix B.
7. Time-variant Irradiation Intensity
In the earlier studies of a mathematical model to describe the moist
cloth-skin system the intensity of irradiation was assumed to be constant.
37
This represents in fact the case of the experiments carried out at MIT; here
an exposure shutter was kept open for a certain time interval and then
closed rapidly, thus forming a square wave of irradiation.
The situation is different in the case of a thermonuclear explosion,
where the intensity of irradiation is time-variant, exhibiting a very
pronounced peak value and a lon docaying section. (An analytical expression
for this intensity distribution was given by Batter,.(23).
Thus the temperature-pressure-tiae response of the system will be quite
different; in particular it may be expected that an irradiation of constant
intensity much smaller than the peak i"tensity of a thermonuclear pulse
will produce a given temperature rise in the skin. At constant irradiation,
temperature rises monotonously and the moisture migrates to the cooler
interior of the system, partly condensing on the skin surface, and although
the moisture on the skin may later vaporize, there is no reversal of heat
flow during irradiation. With an irradiation pulse of finite duration and
energy, on the other hand, the temperature rise will eventually be followed
by a decay, first in the cloth, later also on the skin surface and in the
interior of the skin, Furthermore, it can be expected that there will be
a reversal of the -heat flow %nd with it will be associated a reversal of
the moisture flow.
In order to show these differences between the responses to constant
and time-variant irradiation as well as to allow&a coaiparison of theoretical
results with those obtained from experiments that actually involved a square
wave, the mathematical method has been set up to accept a variable irradiation
intensity as a boundary co.•dition.
This facility allow* foc four cases of intensity distribationst
Step function
Square wave
Trapezoidal wave
Thermonuclear explosion pulse
It is introduced as followas
It.e irradiation intensity affect* only the heat boundary conditionat the
38
outer cloth surface
Io Uo(Tc=0 T OT-Ko ]jj (2.7)
or in dimensionless finitc-difference terms:
I - u° . To &1o (2.7)"0 pu XF0 hX
Note that elsewhere in the formulation of the dimensionless system I is
used also, but merely as a reduction factor for dimensionless notation. If
one st..ll retains some characteristic value of intensity, such as the maximum
of a pulse distribution,. as a eference value, one is free to introduce
into the boundary condition a term expressing the relative irradiation intensity
Io tO / l ,011 " -U° ' T O =O 0 . T o- ~ " 0; - 0T
This value is computed at each time step, preceding the solution .f-r A.,e
temperature distribution.
(a) Description of irradiation pulses
The maximu irradiation intensity is prescribed in absolute terms
(cal/cmasec). Since the prograu used a dimencionless time scale- throughout,
all characteristic extensions of pulses in tine are prescribed in dimensionless
terms, (Figure 2.3).
For the square wve, one quantity r suffices. The time scale of thechahtrapesoidal pulse requires two quantities: S defining the end of its first
ramp, and 9 the end of the pulse.char
39
I0 0lot I I
oax maxOR"x n Iomax -
a0 6 0 a 0 90 O 0 90Bchar er char char
Figure 2.3
IRRADIATION PULSE SHAPES
7he thermonuclear explosion pulse requires one characteristic value 6hlocating the peak of the distribution, and a normalized shape function (20)
indicated in Table 2.1 (see fo:. example, Figure 2.20).
Table 2.1
TIRNOM•NLMEAR PULSE INTENSITY DIS2RIBUTION
Reg"om Relative intensity Energy delivered at time 800/9char Io o)/I (cal/calsec)
0 - 0.3 o.S6S(B~O° ° ) *o~ •O *° 0.25•char charon0 - 0.3 650 = - g° 08
O/char ) char tsS0 1.65 1.,-72 0. 34 7 1 [o0.52•4 o•* .(-aar. COX char char
0
"charar
so 00
1.4- 1.4 10.4342( j -. 1'". .00 r2.696 & char -,J5char LOS) I.. char
*Cý - I
h at
40
For comparison, the program verifies the areas of pulses, i.e., the radiation
energies delivered.
(b) Remark on the squiare wave
In computing the r esonse to a square wave input, a slight difficulty L5
sometimes encountered at the end of the pulse. The sudden. termination of
irradiation leaves in the above mentioned boundary condition only the tern
for the heat losses. Since a surface tempersture val~t is taken to govern
the outward heat flow during an entire time step, the size of time steps may
have to be reduced at this point so as not to simulate too large a heat
Loss during the beginning of the relaxation period. At a later time, when
the sutface temperature has dropped, the original intcrval size can be
resumed. The occurrence of this disturbing effect depends on whether a
sufficiently high surface temperature has been reached at the end of the
pulse. A convenient way of changing the time.step size by altering the
modulus (Ah 0)8/60° Is provided in the program.
Me effect described.does not occur in the cases of a trapesoidal or
thermonuclear pulse shape, whore the process is sufficiently smooth.
8. Burn Severitz Correlation
Different ways of rt.ting the temperature response of the irraaSated
cloth-skin system, to the severity of a resulting burn have been delt with
in former studies, (3, 5). Among these, a correlation based on the concept
of a critical base temperature and a constant skin eathalpy increase appeared
most promising. It states that a burn of given severity iseffected by a
certain minimum value of that part of the skin euthalpy which lies above
a critical temperature level, (see sketch below).
T (0C)
Tcr it
X ( s41(c)
41
This criterion has been tested earlier in particular by comparing University
of Rochester data on mild 2# burns with the results of skin simulant
experiments. Here the mximua of the critical enthalpy (i.e., the shaded
area in ths above plot) was taken to occur at the time at which the measured
temperaturp closeet to the skin simulant surface reached a maximum, (effected
by a square wave of Irradiation). Temperature distributions were plotted,
extrapolated towards the skin simulant surface and. their area above Tcrit
measured. A constant thermal energy increase of 0.89 - 0.93 cal/cms abovea critical temperature of 53 0 C was found to agree with most of the University
of Rochester data.
The same procedure can be applied to temperature distributions obtained
from theoretical calculations. It is more practical, however, to include thisevaluation in the computing program, as the entire temperature history isavailable to it and in particular because this provides a more precise way
of finding that distribution which yields the maximum value in time of the
critical entha t py:
X •a - rit >? T d X f (- ) ( 4 .1 )
(MOen a pulse of irradiati, a applied, the maximum value need not be
associated with taw maximum skin surface temperature, as the temperatures
in the interior of the skin simulant may still continue to rise while theirradiation intensity and the skin simulant surface temperature begin to
decrease).
The computer program described In this report is set up to calculate
by means of a Simpson-rule integration the maximum critical enthalpy attainedat any time during the process. The quantities (Ico) and T are to he
a critprescribed as input parameters.
The temperature distribution in the skin depends strongly on the
assumptions made for the heat and mass transfer coefficients, which can only
be defined within a certain tolerance. Since the burn correlation ietsgral
represents only the top part of the area under a temperatuze proiile, it
NIold be kept in mipi that its value is int tuenced even note by the ctioice
42
of these coefficients. Nevertheless, with this restrictiont it appears
useful to obtain in this direct way the information regarding the burn
correlation that the theoretical solution is able to supply. Moreover,
the facility can be used to find the maximum total heat content of the skin
simulant if the critical temperature 3s given the value of the surrounding
temperature.
C. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
hrliet studies (S) have shown that the theoretical solutions obtained
for. a system involving diathermanous cloth tend to agree better with
experimental observations than those found fao an opaque cloth layer. This
is true for the case of dry cloth as well as for that of moist cloth, and
may be explained by the direct admittance of part of the heat received,
into the i-terior of the system. The pcrpose of extensive computer calculations
devoted to the opaque cloth situation was fourfold:
First, the comergence of the maserical solution with refinement of
the difference-net wa tested. The results of these calculations r e discussed
in Chapter VI, 3, 6.
Next, a number f comnputations was designed to show the influence of
the transfer coefficient-. Io, Us, Ko, Ki and the water vapor diffubLvay D"
on the theoretical response as well as* its agreemnt with experimental
results for constant irradiation levels I - 0.$ - 3.9 cal/coasec, 30C
and 80 relative humidity.
A further a&Im ms to imestigate the type of response obtained under
time-variant irradiation o0 various pulse shapes ad equal total energy,
at maximm intensity levels I a 0.3 - 1.0 cal/cnsset, 30°C and M
relative humidity, using one set of transfer coafficiemta.
A last group of calculations was carried met io order to test the
agreement between a member of experimental results from squate-wave, short
exposure irradiatinn and the theoretical sooltioesobtained rtth *dpntical
irradiation, temperature and relative humidity conditions, (ro0s• a 1.0,
1.4 and 2.6 cal/ca.sec; 19gC; 63 relative humidity). The transfer coefficients
43
and the diffusivity were varied in these tests. Purthermore, so-e theoretical
results for the diathermanous cloth case in comparison wit; experimental
curves are presented.
1. Nunerical Values used in the Computations
The values ot the parameters used are summarized below. A complete
reference, in particular on the estimation of the transfer coefficients,
is given in (5).
(a) Properties of the cloths
PO a 1.57 gm/cm for cellulose
PCLc a 0.027O gm/cm5 for * os. standard cotton sateen
Lc a 0.043 ca (measured)f • 1,- ( c /P• - 0.394
C a 0.34 cal/gmCkc w 1.62 # 10-4 cl/cm sec C, based on (L/kz) a 266 cm see C/cat1Ir a 0.105 pig/ca sec ms ag at an average temperature of 50°C and
with a tortmselty fartur of X * 1w2.4 (see VI, D, 3)
(b) Properties of the skin simulant: see V' C. 1.
Trans fer Coefficientss
The following estimates ere used as a basis-Surface heat transfer coefficient:
A dimensionless value 11 a 0.1 ws used, ccrrespondirg to0
U w 18.6 * 10" cal/cmssec°C
Air gap beat transfer coefficients
U: 5.0, corresponding to Ua I 3.76 103 cal/cmasec°C
Surface moisture ,ransfer coefficients
K* a 0.23agm/cosec - Mg
Air Sap moisture transfer coefficient trffective)s
x a 14.4pgm/cmec m HS
The variations applied to the transfer coefficients are discussed in the
following sections.
Heat of desorptiont
X a 6.0 cal/jm emO
44
In all of the computations, the 6-alice model was used with a modulus MA 5and a skin/cloth property ratio group * S.
2. Constant Irradiation - Influence of Transfer Coefficients and
Diffuaivityl Comparison with 9xperiments
The estimates of the parameters Uo0 i, X. o, K and D" have been
established in (5). Considerable tolerance has to be allowed for these
values, particularly regarding the effective water vapor diffusivity V'
and the mass transfer coefficients. D" is subject to an uncertainty due to
the tortuosity factor which may tange between I and 0.2 or less. It also
enters into the derivation of the mass transfer coefficient for the air
gap. The theoretical results vary rather strongly with changes in the
choice of all these parameters, easpecially at long exposure times.
In tart, once it has been shown that the experimental results can be
reproduced closely by a calculation, the comparison between theoretical
and experimental responses may be looked at as a method to find values
of the coefficients rather than as a check on the validity of the analytic
model.
The following discussion concerns calculations involving a surrounding
teraperture of 30OC and i ; lative humidity of M0g.
Fimure 2.10 shon the dimensionless skin simluant temperature response
at simulated depths X° a 0.05 and 0.15 as a function of dimensionless time.
At an irradiation intensity 1n a 0.83 5 s/caes, the transfer coefficients
are varied through the ranges
Us a 0.1...0.02S or U u (3.76 .#o694)010 4 csl/clse
U0 S.0.,.0 0 0 ot UL * (1,6 *.*#3?.2)*104 cal/camsee
0 - 0.2 ... 0.05 Vs/csmm HS
X- 14.4 ... 3.6 ugu/ctm HU
The effective diffusion coefficient DV is held at a constant value of
DO a 0.105 p"A/cn sec -m Hg (except wht*r indicated to be variable), It
Is seen that te, I aM U have the strongest influence, while the surface
45
heat trrnsfer coefficient only affects the solution at longer exposure tines.
Figures 2.11 and 2.12, based on Figure 2.10, present a comparison withthe experimental response, determined also at 1° a 0.83 cal/ctasec. Two
cases having different transfer coefficients are given. The experimental
curves describe the temperature at simulsted depths X* a 0.028, 0.038 aid
0.122 ca (thermocouple locations).
The theoretical curves referring to these sae depth values have been
obtained from cross-plots of the calculated data. It appears that a not too
drastic alteration from the original estimates for the transfer coefficients
(by factors 1/2 for Ui and 1/4 for U0 , K , and X I) leads to quite good
agreement with the measured temperatures.
Figure 2.13,also at 1 0 0.83 cal/cm, shows the variation introduced
when variab1,t diffusivity values DP', based on equation (2.13), are used in
the calculations instead of a fixed average value. This does not seen to
improve the agreement in the above case; in other examples, however, which
are discussed later (VIC, 4) the refinement has indeed led to a better
approximation, kick means a different combination of transier coefficients
may be needed here for closer agreement.
In Figure 2.14 the inflIte=ce of an increased value of U and decreased
ones for Us, 1o and KI is shma again for an irradiation intensity 1° -
0.5 cal/coesac.
Figures 2.15, 2.16, and 2.17 present a comparison with the experimental
response at intensities 0.5, 1.26, and 3.96 cal/camsec. The irregular
appearance of the experimental curves at 1 a 1.36 stens from a partly
scorched ;loth layer. The cases of 1o a 0.5 and 1.26 show rather good
agreement, with the theoretical curves being slightly too steep at tonger
times. At I1 a 3,%# the position of the calculated curves is high from the
beginning. It appears that in all of these cases the application of a
variable diffusivity (according to equation 3.13), with transfer ciwfficicnts
in the range indicated on the figures, would have yielded a considerably
better reproduction of the experimental response.
A comparison between the temperature responses of the moist and dry,
opaque cloth systems is drawn in Figures 1.11 (experimental) and 3.18
46
(theoretical). The two figures are not precisely analogous in that they
refer to slightly different skin simulant depths (xs a 0.028 cm and to
XA 0.05 0 xs - 0.014 cm). Yet they show that the theoretical response for
the larger intensities lacks the prnnounced change in slope occurring in
the experimental moist cloth curves prior to their intersection with the
curve for the dry cloth. In the logarithmic plots, too, this discrepancy
is displayed hy the slopes of tho theoretical curves which are too steep at
longer times.
The role of moisture in the system contributes greatly to the heat
transport towards the skin simulant, but only initially. Eventually, the
pressure gradients in the cloth reverse their direction (Which can be read
from the numerical results), leaving conduction as the only mode of heat
transmission into the interior of the system. An inspection of the above
figures sugg-sts that this, effect is not simulated strongly enough by the
theory. The reason may be,*ght in the neglection of bulk flow of water
vapor, in our model, but it is also possible that refinement is needed for
the treatment o( completely dry parts of the cloth which so far involves the
assumption of a partially linear pressure profile.
Deviations between theory and experiments as discussed above are less
striking in the case of a I. thermanous (moist or dry) cloth. for whirN
an analogous comparison based on earlier studies (5) is given in Figures
1.12 and 2.19.
So far, the theoretical results have been judged by the response at
small skin depths relatively close to each other (0.028 and 0.03$ cm). At
larger depths (0.122 cm) a deviation is common to most cases, which cannot
be neglected. It may be accounted for by the fa-t that the value used
exclusively for the skin/rloth property ratio ItIi(bCp) /CkCp)c c 5.0)
is the one based on the dry cloth system and need not hold exactly true for
the moist cloth situation; this would distort the sisulated skin depth
scale. As yet the effect has not been tested.
The water vapor diffueiy ity D" has not been given alternate (constant)
values In the calculations, since it affects the results mainly in the shost-
time range, while the major deviations of the calculated responses still
occur at longer times.
47
The preceding discussions concern only the predominant parameters among
those not known precisely. Their influences at least can be established
by the use of the computinj program. The effects of further variations,
e.g., of the tortuosity factor occurring both in D' and XL, of the cloth
heat conductivity k and 1, as well as the surrounding temperature and
relative humidity can likewise be determined, requiring a large but not
excessive amount of computer time. In order to define a narrower range
for the first group of parameters (U0, Uit ro, rX, D") however, not only
a considptable number of calculatlons would be needed but also a larger
set of experiments repeated under each condition.
3. Time-Variant Irradiation - Influence of Pulse Shamp
A set of calculations has been carried out in order to observe
qualitatively th' response variation with irradiation pulses of different
shapes. In order to provide soca common basis for comparison, the areas of
the p41ses (i.e., the total irradiation energies) are kept the same within
each of two groups. The first group is based on the total energy delivered
by a thermonuclear pulse distribution with peak intensity I O 0.5 cal/cuasec
and peak-t.ime ch a 0.5 until 6 0 5..0 this energy equals 0.545 cal/cm'sec
(its dimension stems from the -a- of a dimensionless time scale but absolute
intensity). The second group useýs a thermonuclear pulse with peak intensity
I • 1.0 cal/cmasec as a basis, with an area of 1.09 cal/cmssec until
e 5.0.
Square and trapezoidal " ,s at different irradiation intensity levels
&4J the thernonuclear pu~se are used s input form. The latter, fat conven-
ience, shall be referred to as the "true pulse. The other conditions assumed
and comon to all of these calculations ares surrounding temperature 30°C.reoative humidity 80%, and transfer coefficiants and constant water vapor
diffusivity as stated in VI, C, 1.
The results of the first group of runs are showm in Pigure 2.20# The
four cases presented are the true pulse with peak at 0.5 cal/cmasac. a
square wave distribution with intensity level I o 0.5 cal/cmsec, a
square and trapesoidal wave both with I a 0.3 cal/cmsew; these distri-
butions are indr;.jted in the upper part of Figure 2.20. The loet part
48
of the graph shows the respective temperature responses of the skin simulant
at simulated depths Xu 0 0.0167 and 0.15. In order to permit a comparison,s
the temperatures are given in reduced, but not dimensionless form, i.e., as
value of To -. I oX (- AT. (kjL) ).
It is not surprising that the square wave with I a 0.5 cal/cm2 sec
yields a higher temperature response than the true pulse of same intensity
level. However, the latter response shows values still considerably lower
thar those produced by the square and trapezoidal waves at 60% of its peak
intensity, (0.3 cal/cm sec) near the skin simulant surface as well as in its
interior.
Figure 2.21 shows the results of thesecond group of calculations, comparing
the true pulse function of saxioun level 1.0 cal/cResec with trapezoidal
waves at 1I3 a 1.0 and 0.6 cal/cm2sec, a square wave with I 0 0.6 and
0.4 cal/cmasec, and the case of constant irradiation intensity 1.0 cal/cdasec.
The temperature response To Io is given far one depth value X° a 0.0167.
As in the first group, the square and trapesoidal waves not only at 0.6 Dut
even at 0.4 cal/cnssec lead to much higher skin iimulant temperatures than
the true pulse. This can be attributed to the fact that the latter irradiation
distribution yields a faster rise of the cloth surface temperattire and of the
water vapor pressure neat dj e cloth surface than square ant 1rapesoii. iaves
at lower intensity levels, thus increasing the beat and moisture losses at
the system surface. Furthermore, the reveral of the pressure gradient
in the cloth takes place at an earlier time with the true pulse so that during
the section of decaying irradiation intensity the conductive heat transfer
to the ehin sinulant is counteracted by the moisture transport directed
outward.
In none of the cases described do the temperature gradients in cloth and
skin reverse their direction, so that within the calculated time range the
decay of temperatures in the skin sioulant is only due to the mass transfer
from its surface to the cloth. Naturally, the temperatures in its interior
keep rising for some time while the surface l smparature has begun to drop.
These conditions can be read clearly from the numericaL restits; they
may only be stated here in passing since a complete representation of the
49
results would require too much space. Reference is made though to the logarithmic
plots of the skin simula~it temperature respenses of all the cases, given0for simulated depths up to X 0.95 in Pigures 3.8 through 3.16, Appendix P.
4. Time-Variant Irradiation - Comparison with Experiments
It is clear from pr',vious discussions that a rather wide range of
experiments is required to serve as a yardstick, if the capacity of the
mathematical anslysis to model outr physical system is to be examined. The
number of physical coefficients which are subject to an estimation only
underlines this necessity, In the effort to come to a closer agreement
between theoretical predictions and experimental evidence, the judgement of
how well the model reproduces the situation and the *improvement" of those
parameters are intertwined, thus making the judgment somewhat relative.
The examples for a theoretical approximation of the measured response
described before have left some uncertainty regarding which of the five
most important parameters are to be altered and to what d4gree. They applied
to a constant irradiation input, i.e., to cases in which the entire precess
develop* in one direction. A ne rigid test for the model may be formed
by a pulse input, where the direction oi events ultimately is reversed,
even to the extent that part of the cloth layer will dry out first and later
attain moisture again.
Some calculations serving such a test have been executed, with conditions
matching those of experiments. All of then were done with a surrounding
tempet-ature of 190C, and 653 relative humidity.
The first group of these computations applied to a square wave irradiation
of intensity level 1.0 cal/cmesec and 4 seconds exposure time (1O a 1.62),char
In the calculations presented by Figures 2.22 through 2.24, constant values
DR w 0.105 pgagcm sec m g HS and U0 a 0.1 (U • 3.76 • 10-4 Cal/calmec°C) are0 0
used, while the other tra-wfer coefficients are varied in the ranges
-osU1 - 2.5 - 10.0 or Ul - (9.3 - 37.2) - 10"3 cal/cm sec C
K a 0.05 - 0.2 agm/cm'sec - HV
a 1 3.6 - 14.4 "ag/cmssec M Hg
(The combinations are indLcted on the plots).
so
.- /
Neither the positions nor the shapes of the curves referring to 3 simulated
skin depths appear quite satisfactory. Additional trial run. in the aboveran$e of parameter values (not presented here) havy not yielded any better
agreement. It is to be noted that the cloth is recorded by the program
to become dry throulhout after 00 a 1.6 (4w4 seconds, L.e., at the end of
the pulse). In the cases quoted first, half of the cloth is dry already
at Go" 0.95. Obviously the test is hampered by tha fact that 65% relative
humidity may be low enough to produce a situation where the moist-cloth
theory finally applies -only to a very small section of the cloth, namely
Just the last xli'e out of six slices, while the dry part is manipulated
according to the procedure described in V, 8, 3.
It is suspected that the water vapor diffusivity must not be excluded
from our parameter trial procedure. In fact, one calculation carried out
with vsriaole diffusivity (according to equation 2.13) and the "orilinal"
values for the transfer coefficients (VM, C, 1) yields much better agreement
between theory and experiment* if not beyond the maximum of the temperature
functions, (Figure 2.25). It seems that further improvement can be achieved
hy not too severt variations of the heat u& as** transfer coefficients from
their original estimated values, while using variable diffusivity.
Considering ihe requ.-.ed expense of machine time howevo&, the effort
had to be limited to a few trials.
The situation looks more favorable in a second pair of calculations
involving a square wave of intensity 0os a 1.4 cal/cussee and two seconds
exposure time,
In the case recorded in Figure 2.26, a constant diffusivity DO.
0.10 pgm/cm s&c ma 1% is used, while Figure 2.27 depicts the response
when D" is variable. For Uo,U 9, 10 ,h the original estimtes are used. Again
it appears that the assumption of a fixed average diffusivity should not be
made. As before, the cloth dries out rapidly while irradiated, until only
two out of six slices are left moist (contrasted with one in the previous
expeple, which may explain the discrepancy in agreement with the experiment
there). In the subsequent relaxation period, the cloth becomes moist through-
out, nourished fro, the condensed moisture on the skin simulant. surfaee.
S1
Thus considering the fact that the computation has to treat the system
as a composite dry-moist system during almost the entire period, the results
mentioned last could be considered remarkable. While the reversal of moisture
flow can be detected readily from the numerical results, the temperature
graoient in the cloth and skin simulant - except in the outermost half-
slice of the cloth - does not change its direction, so that the only outward
heat flow in the system interior during the relaxation period is constituted
by the action of the moisture transport. This obbervati3n holds true for
all pulse responses computed so far.
5. Remark on the Burn Severity Correlation
In the calculations discussed above, the integral (4.1) designed tn
serve as a basis for the correlation of burn severity has been evaluated.
As expected, its maximum occurs at some time aftcr the surface temperature
of the skin similant is highest. The results also show that the value of
the integral varies more than do the temperatures obtained when transfer
coefficients etc. are changed, For example, while the skin simulant temper-
atures at and near the surface vary by shout 9% between the curves of figures
2.22 and 2.24, the integral hianges its value by about 247.. This indicates
that a fairly high reliability of the calculated temperature profiles is
required to define the critic,. skin enthalpy clorely enough, if it ta o,
be applied to a correlation with experimental burn data.
VII. SUW94ARY AND CONCLUS1ION
The temperature response of a system composed of a skin simulant
covered by dry or moist cloth and exposed to radiative heating has been
studied experimentally and theoretically.
The mathematical analysis adequately describes the behavior of the
dry. cloth-skin simulant system. The response to constant or time-variant
irradiation can be constructed on the basis of gen~eral solutions both for
opaque and diathermanous cloth.
The theoretical model for the moist cloth-skin simulant system is
based on molecular diffusion ut water vapor as the only mode of moisture
transfer, this& neglecting bulk flow of water vapor -and other simplifying
52
assumptions. It is designed for an opaque cloth layer but could be altered
to apply to diathermanous cloth as well by a method analogous to that
developed for the dry cloth case. The theoretical formulation is not
general but requires new computer calculations for any set of 3pecific
conditions. Either constant or time-variant irradiation intensities are
acceptable as boundAry conditions; the latter may be a square wave,
trapezoidal wave or a thermonuclear explosion pulse distribution. It also
takes into account the complete drying of part of the cloth layer which can
always be expected in reality.
This model yields solutions which agree fairly well with experimental
results both for constant and time-varying irradiation. Uncertainties are
inherent mainly in the values of heat and mass transfer coefficients and the
water vapor diffusivity. Both further experiments and calculations extending
over a ra.?-a of these parameters could serve to determine better estimates
for their values and thus imprnve the capability of the computing system
for predicting the system behavior more accurately,
With the above reso;vations the variation in the temperature responses
to irradiation of different distribution forms can be estaolished clearly.
The model can serve as a tool for inspection of the influences caused not
only by the transfer co* "'i ients, but by ot.>er conditions s'uch as .a..
surrounding temperature, relative humidity and properties of the cloth.
Th7 numerical results permit the observation of phenome-a which cannot be
detected experimentally, such as the direction and rate of moisture flow
and the process of drying out of the cloth.
Ilfe solution includes a measure for the "critical enthalpy" of the cloth,
which can be related to the severity of burns. This criterion is most
sensitive to slight varltiors of the theoretical temperature response and
deserves further testing.
The study of the influences on the heat transfer by chmical reactions
in the Irradiated cloth, by the structure of the fabric and moisture-retaining
additives still are open paths fcr further research into the protection
f in burns0
33
APPENDIX A
NOMENCIATURE
S Coefficient in partial differential tquation
I Coefficient in partial differential equation
C Mess heat cappcity, cal/pom°C
S Coefficient in partial differential equation
D Diffusion coefficient 5 lop n mol/cm sec
D' Average diffasiohicoefficient 2 D/(l-y av) gn aol/cm sec
D" Corrected Mass diffusion coefficient through cloth - gD'/i/W
pgm/cm sec mm Hg
0 Diffusivity, caa/sec
5 Coefficient in partial differential equation
f Volume fraction of voids in cloth, dimensionless
g Tortuosity factor for the diffusion through cloth
I Intensity of incident ra " tion, cal/cmnsec
10 Intensity of unreflected radiation, cal/cassec; constant, unless specified
as time-variant
I 00M Characteristic intensity level of unreflected radiation, cal/cmssec;
(used whenever I specified as time-variant)0
Ix Intensity of radiation at depth x, cal/cmesec
k Thermal conductivity, cal/ca sec0 C
K Mass (moisture) transfer coefficients, Pgm/cPasec°C
L Thickness, ca
M .ioisture content of cloth, wt. H@0/100 wt. dry cloth
R Molecular weight
MA Modulus
54
p Partial pressure, -m Hg
P Base pressure used in connection with dimensionless transformation,0
"mmHg
P0 Dimensionless partial pressure
R Universal gas constant, casum HS/g mol°X
T Property ratio- 6x / Ao !
t Time .sec
T Temperature, 0C except when specified as OK
T Base temperature, °C
u Function
U Overull heat transfer coefficient, cal/cassec°C
w Right hand sides of tridiagonal equation systen for finite difference
solution
x Distance or depth, cm
Z° Dimeosionless depth
y Mole fraction, dime.-ts'nless
Greek:
SThermal diffusivity of cloth
j Leftt hand side. coefficients of tridiagonal equation system for finite
difference solution
y Extinction coefficient, ca"I
A Finite increment
qr light hand sides of tridiagonal equation systes for finite difference
solution
* Exposure or irradiation time, sec
X Heat of desorption, cal/agn (nuaerically negative)
W Total pressure, -i Jg
5,
I4 Left hand side coefficients of bidiagc''e, equation system fcc finite
difference solution
P Mass density, pgjc/w.f
P0 Mass density of cellulose or solid, b-m/cma
p Molal density, gX aol/cmI
X Summation
1 Transmittance
Function
Subscript-,;
c Cloth
char Characteristic abscissa -n'iriadiation pulse
cond Moisture condensation
crit Critical value (tinperaturt)
er Characteristic abscissa In trapezoidal irradiation pulse
evap Moisture evaporation
i Air gap between cloth and skin simulant except when used to denote i
components
J Depth planes
n Time increments
o Cloth surfa, - unless spe, tied otherwise
SSkin SiAular;
surr Surroundinrs
A, a, ... Depth planes
5@
first subscript : spac.
second subscript tim
Superscripts:
0 Dimensionless groups
117
APPENDIX B
METHOD OF SOLUTION - IMY CLOTH OVER SKIN SIMULANT SYSTIN
A. OPAQUE CLOTH
With the dimensional transformations (1.8) introduced in the main section
a;..: with the finite-difference notations:
&PTo -2T* *Toa
Am°-nn i° J+.n&Xoa 0 (aK 0)s (Ax')s
C C j.1 C C
To T6• ro me .nj l " J.n
the problem of the npaque-cloth-okin system (equations 1.1- 1.3) can be
stated in dimensionless ter" a followas
I. Basic Bq'mtions:
(a) For the cloth layers
AT° 43TO
as* (p.1)oC C
(b) For the skin simulants
- -- (1.3)'4,0 (4XO)S
udiere A60 a Ag o ASe if the modulus (&XO)*/It0 Ia taken to be the sam InC 0both the cloth aid skin simulant, which implies that the ratio of apace
intervals becomest
5.
0AX c tC~O
A~~zR=I (1.9)
x )c
2. Boundary Conditions:
(a) At the outer surface of ihe ctoths
(l/Ub) (- TO ., S(1.4)'
CX° 0 (I/U0)
(b) At the inner surface of the cloth sad the skin surfaces
ATOTOO TOOAI: 0.1 (lA W ATj
3. Numerical Solution -Modified Schmidt Technique
Cloth ad skin simulant are divided into slices of width AX* aOn 0C
respectively, The reference planes foe temperature are located at the center
of the slices and also halt a slice beyond the surfaces of the cloth and
skin simmlant (see Figure 1.2). This convention is known to produce a better
appcoximation to the true %--ution than taking the surfaces as reference
planes (14, 19, 20). A scheme having two cloth slices is used below for
demonstration.
I*-- a
c!
a a
"I I I
0 0 0.$ 1.0 o 0 011 0, -
CaVM SKIN aIM LANT
59
a II
The calculation of a temperature distribution starts with the temperature
value at plane A, for which the boundary condition (1.4)' can be written &at
*(lU~)- SA A? + TO (a initially zero) (.)TAnl (/Uo). "z/2 c B
0 C
where (To 4 a and To 0ibis relation is illustrated by
Figure 1.3.
Next, the temperature values inside the cloth are computed according to
equation (M)' , which may be written as:
(O)a
CT0 -~ T, fP r0 C -T To) 0 ýBCn Tn B" A'n 0 i",n+l TD.n)C'o
0 4
This relation car be simpified considerably if the modulus (AX )/Ao 0
is taken to bto 2, as proposed by Schmidt:
*A.na C~n3,m*l 2
or generally,Tj n I . T o', nz Tol.
where J may denote any slice b. t ii the cloth. In particular, this fcarmULation
allow for a graphical interpretation of the process, (Figure 1.3).
A a C D B FGHIg j ! ag
l: J i ll ,I I i I,.o! I '
vo
* LI
1: . 1 .o0 LC X oFigure A .3
60
At the planes above the inner cloth surface and the skin surfsme (W 1nd
B for the 2-slice model) the tempera ures at time n*l are obtained1 by
means of the boundary condition (1.5)1, which ii• reordered form yields:
Cn Fn) 2 +
D~n.1
and similarly (1.5)"
(TO -TO ) A-* C. a P.m s8 T-01,n.10 F,M
Io
Ui 2
These reletiong can also be verified graphically if the planes X; I andC
X0 a 0 are .ep.,rated by a distance lAJ, (Fe. z.4)1 t:, temperaturedistribution throughout the system can then be dranm contimnuusly.
C D 11
I I
I i 'I J I
C C I I
C I
1o .0 X; 0
FJigure 1.4
61
The conduction of heat into the interior of the skin is governed by
equation (1.3)'. Using the modulus (AX0 )*/AO0 . 2 for the skin simulant,
the same simple formulation is obtained as for the cloth equation:
T 0 'J-l.n JTln (13)"J'n+l 2
It is to be noted here that the method outlined above is a modification of
the one originally proposed by Schmidt (19, 20). In applying the boundary
condition (1.4), Schmidt's method properly states that at time o, T o 0X noTo 0 at the outer clcth surface. However, in the next step, thesu rr
Calculation of 0T°B' all the space between the planes A and B is implicitly
assumed to have the heat capacity of cloth. In the modified technique
described, this error is partly compensated for by the assumption (in
boundary condition 1.4") of T0 ! To • 0 at time 0 and the neglection5,0 surr
of heat capac.ty in the half-slice ftom the surface to plane B, which
leads to a closer approxim t ion to the true solution.
4. Stability and Accuracy
It is known for this particular type of computing algorithm that the
solution is both stable And convergent with tefinement of the intervals
if the modulus is larger then or equal to 2, (18).
Comparitive solutions us. -, the 2- and 6-slice models and a modulus
N a 2 (in order to retain the simplicity of the computing scheme) have
shown that the accuracy is improved only in the low-time range (P I:S I,
corresponding approximately to 0° < 2.5 Arc of real time) by the finer mesh.
Therefore the calculations are best started using the 6-alice model and
then continued with the 2-slice model.
Fuihier details of the method are described in (4).
8. DIATHUMAPOJS CWTH
1. Basic Equations
The basic equations governing the case of diathermanous cloth can
be transformed into the following dimensionless and finite-difference fnrmi
62
(a) For the cloth layer:
AT0 A'T0 A (e' c) (1.2) 'U o
(b) For the skin s3nulant:
(identical with the opaque cloth case)
AT0 A- - - (1 .3)'as
C
again with A$ a s A.: - ant , 0 M.um the only new term0
sA(e YL,.cX thintroduced is a heat sourceat each cloth increment.
in ui.ing the finite-difference model, it is usu&ed that the amount
of radiant ,-ergy absorbed in the center of each slice of the cloth is
distributed according to the Beer-Lanbert law. Inspection of this distribution
shows this to be justified for clothof high isiathermncy, where the radiant
energy decreases nearly linearly across the cloth. With a cloth of low
diathermancy, however, tei decay of intbmsity is much stronger bear the
exposed surface of the cloth. Therefore a better assumption is that the
fraction of incident radiat'on absorbed by the first cloth slice is shmerwed
at the front surface (aislowous to the opaque cloth case).
The boundary condition at the front surface thus appears different
according to either assumption.
2. Boundary Condition at the Front Cloth Surfae
(a) High diathersmancy
X:-O € 7-.
00(b) LOW diathermncy
IA' .YCI~) (70 To1 O r o S a " n; ( l . 6 b ) '
UýU 0C x 00
63
Also for low diathermancy, the radiation term disappears from the equation
for th-, firs. increment:
A~o a~o(1.2a)'
A90 -0 ( 0X20
3. Boundary Conditions in the Air Gap
(a) Between the back surface of the cloth and the air gaps
T0 T0 TOO -a"- "U ig" " (1. 7.)'
(b) Between the air gap and the skin simulant:
1•° I*YC) C. 0. T00 )
.. TJ ' - ~uO z~l(1.7b)t
.ý Jr-ON i
The evaluation of this pr~blem follows the same path as that of the opaqueA(@TLCX:)o
case, except that the i.sdependent variable has to be evaluated
for each cloth increment.
As a consequence, the solu Lon will be specific with respect to tpe
value yL *
4. Simplified General Solution for Diathermanous Cloth
Since the system is linear, however, it is in fact possible to acrive
at a generalized solution eliminating the need to calculate anew f(c
different diathormancies.
7he response to any one intensity can be considered to be the weighted
sum of a numbes of solutions, in each of which a unit of radiant energy is
assuen* Oo be abeorbed in one particular cloth increment only. The weighting
factors to be applied then are the fractions of the incident radiation that
are associated with each increment by the given distribution, i.e., A(e'YL )
Thus as many basic solutions are required as there are planes in
64
which absorption is assumed, (which needs not coincide with the number of
conceptual slices in the cloth). In particular, a method was proposed in
which absorption is taken to occur at three locations only, resulting in
three basic curves or solutions:
Curve I represents the case of alsorption of a unit of radiant energy
at the exposed surface of the cloth, which is equivalent to the opaque
cloth solution.
Curve II represents the case of unit absorption at X° 0 0.75, and
Curve III represents that of absorption at the surface of the skin
simulant. fat this method, the equations in dinite difference form
beccmes
Curve 1: identical with opaque cloth case.
Curve Y1:
1. Far the c~otk layers
0(a) Any increment other than that assc•ciated with X C 0.75
h .° (1.209A9e (Ax O)v
(b) 77w clct.i increment %tose centerline ia at x, a 0,75
"To I (1,2b) fo (AX O)s AXc°
c c
2. Fee the skin simulants
- 0 (1.3)T'Wo (AX:la
3, Dwudary coaditions at the front surface of the cloth#
SAT° • (•.0 l~strr)(l.6a)'
'S
"~~~~~~~~~A 1 0
4, Boundary conditions in the air gaps
0T U o (Too. --To
Ao Ut . x0.O) (1.7b)'
0 0
Curve Ill:
1. For all increments of the cloth layer:
•T°=. 'r°(1 .2)'A• 4STO
e0* (42x0)3C
2. For the skin sifulant:
3. Boundary condition at the front surface of the cloth:
17 U.0(Too -To (I6)0 aXC*O surr
4. Boundary conditior.% zi the air gaps
(a) Between the back surface of the cloth and the air gaps
l X u I o 1 Two - T:o ) (l.7a)'AX~ c a-i T- xsftO
(b) Between the air Sap ard the surface of the skin simulant:
o ...a I (1.7b)l
The total response resulting from any particular diAthermancy can be
obtained from contributtions of the three curves by applying to then a
weighting factor according to the fractions of radiant energy itworbed at
the three discrete locations:
6'
w
or< X0.0. 5T0 L j [.0YU0c I T I *o 1.0 " T1
C c
00oX 1.10
[eYLcXc rX 0' L (1.9)
c
A solution in which radiant energy is assumed to be absorbed in each
cloth slice (according to equation 2') can be expected to be more accrat¢.
than the scheme described above. Calculations of such a solution for the
6.-slice model, however, have shotm that the gain in accuracy is in fact small
and would not Justify the increase in computing Wfort over that required
by the general three-curve solution method.
67
. , , i i I I I II-
APPENDIX C
SOLUTION ALG ITIM - MOIST CLOTH - SKIN SINULANT SYST94
In the following description the cloth is assumed to be conceptually
divided into six slices of width AX0 and the skin is assumed to have anc
infinite number of slices AX° (figure 2.1).5
The T°- and PO values associated with these are taken at their aid-
points. Points .-8 and 9 are located above the cloth and skin surfaces
at distances AX 0 / and 0AX/ , respectively.C a
With the derivatives written out and the unknowns separated to the
left hand sides, the equations governing the four phases of the alternating
solution scheme are:
-CT 2 -. MA)0 -+XTA"Tc - (Jn+ J+l.n+lj-l,n.l "M *A )T,- A"T° "
!(P 2P 0 -N T,0 (2.14)A. ~n J~n *j+l,n MA j'n
1Po . M) Aon~l Pojln.
C (74 2T Z 0 + T0 )-.0 (2.15)J-nn+l J,n+l J+J.l,n~l
15P0 -(~ ) 0 + 6P0J.4,n*2 -(' MA pJ,n+2 j~l,n.2'(B -o -T +2• T,,:,(2,n16)
J-l-n+n Jn÷l- J*•.n A(
J '-l,n+2 + 2 MA)T Jn+2 J.1,n.2
J.. 1n+2 - in*2 J+l,n2) MA TJDn~l
ism--
Both skin and cloth are treated in the same calculating system, such that
equations (2.15) and (2.16) are only evaluated for points J in the cloth.
Whenever in equations (2.14) and 2.17) J denotes a point in the skin,
the pressure term is dropped and the space interval AX a replaced by AX 0
As an example, the first phase of the alternating solution scheme
shall be described. Equation 2.14 is applied to the entire set of points
in the cloth, which is verified identically by lines 2 ... 6 of the system
Figure 2.5. At the cloth and skin surfaces, the boundary conditions are
to be taken into account. Thus as J 0 1, the unknown T1 na l is temporarily
substituted by means of Tn and the boundary condition 2.7"12,u~l
1 -U 0 (T0 no AT0
equival6nt to
0 U -2o* T-0 (2.7a)"2.U*Ax Uh1.3 2,n*l
0 c 0oC
which modifies both the left and right hand sides of the first equation
(line 0 - line I in Figure 2.5).
The temperatures T*, ... To near the surfaces confining the7,n~l lo~n~l
air gap are related through boundary condition (2.9)", which can be - ritten
as, 0 0(T..[... ..... [ (2.9T)"
T,nO l * •x° • rR.
U 0 2
*&As well AS
-T T )AX0 Us Ax *a [P? IRI* 7n~l 1O.n~l a + J- -- (2. 9b)"
O~n~lI AX a 0 0,n~l
Ii a
After reordering, these relations match the general schom applied in the
69
System (Figure 2.5) and fOr, lines 7 ind a.Last, equation (2.4a)" :Is applied t, all of the points in the skin,which is considered semi-jifin'te. At the start, i.e., at time zero,the equations are written do-*, faz a Sll, arbitrary number of pointsin the skin, since initially T!,,-, 4 0- In this Way, a tridiagonal systemof equations isi formed. The expiessions for all of the cceCt(cientsappearing in the middle diagonal and for the right hand sides are listed
in Figure 2.5.
Next, the system is soived by successive elimination. Dividingthe first equation by a factor I s I and adding to the second equation,one obtains s
To."•2 "l/))•13,n÷1 4 ,o~l
92
• -((W/ 2) w2
DiviJing this by • (2 - 1/VI) and adding to the third yields,
-(3 /V2 TO a TO-"•3 4,n'l S,n~lm3
"" ((w2 /' 2 ) 3 ) " 3
etc.This elimination scheme, carried throughout the system, reaults in abidiaaonal set of equations (Figure 2.6), the coefficients and right handsides of which follow the relationst
S"i. '.• -.2 ... 6, 9
ai" wi 1 /V , i a 2 . @ 9 ...Equations (2.9a)" and (2.9b)* are brought to match toic bidiagonal pattern
70
by means of a linear combination of the bth, 7th, and 8th lines, resulting
in
(,6Q - l)(l - S) + (l - Q)6 •6 ( - Q)
V V 6TS - 1I8 6 V6 7'(S "'1)
w6 (Q - S) _ 6 [- S)P - (1 - Q)SRJ
7 6 S(l - Q)
0 o0
.*SR r17+ _po W/,6 6 (5 - 9)
where(2AqJ•) * Ax0 o Axeq-5 C(2/U*) +AX0 4xO(2/U ) * Ax AX0
s. uo (Ax* + Ax),*S •
xoo
Ax0 AX0
QH -oK(27J•) + X°AXc "
Sit- (4x:/2 + I/U*)rK
The bidiagonsl sys ten is solved by backward substitution, yielding the
future time temperature values Starting with the last equations
in tim interior of the skin, we get
00 * ,M÷in.l •-.,,n.l WMA w N-I
w /VJ'n.l J.l,n.l " J-1J-1
71
until j = 2. To results from the boundary condition (2.7)". At thepoint 14.2 in the skin simulant, the temperature is zero. After each time
s tep, the number of points N and thus the size of the equation sys ten is
increased by one, accounting for the propagation of the tepexature
profile into the skip simulant.
The three remaining phases Of tU alternating scheme (2.12), namely
those based on equations (2.15 - 2.17), in principle follow the same path
as outlined above. In treating the implicit evaluation of future time
pressures, the elimination of Pn0 is done by means of the boundary
condition (2.8)". Die boundary condition (2.9)" for the pressure in the
air gap enters into the 7th equation of the tridiagonal system, which
has a constant size corresponding to the number of cloth slices.
72
APPENDIX D)
MASS AND HEAT BALANCE - MOIST CL07H - SKIN SIMULANT SYST13M
A means of testing the internal consistency of the computation is
provided by the indication of the (cumulative) amounts of moisture lost
due to avaporation at the front surface of the cloth and condensation at
the skin 31mulant surface.
A Mass balance can be set Up as follows:
evaporation condensationl :loth, firal aMcloth, initial
From equation (2.6)" follows~
The sum of the su~fACe prOLaure Values, taken ove all a past time steps,
is recorded as
"SURF LCISS' 2 P.~
with 69 69 - (L8 pC/k)c .n:M a (AX 0)*/AO0 9 the surface loss of Av.i~ure
is
Mevap 0PK oO) (L~'pCA)0 . (SURF LOSS) (uigaIHg/cm$)
c (53,*)
The moisture flux through the Inner cloth surface Is given by:
moisture flux I P 1' p e P.J o.2)(air gap) 0 1
(takiuig the 6-alice model as an example)
The program evaluates
73
Thus the total amount of moisture condensed is given by
Mcond a A 0 (o..,AJ ( (CciD) ( aO/c,,) (5.2.)cond 0 1(AX0c)'
The remaining moisture content of the cloth is constructed as
I
4cloth, final a PcLci= X c(TiP (pgnHvO/cx2) (3.3)
(i counting the number f -cloth slices)
A heat balance may also be established; however, the integrals
required (over the surface temperature gradients and over the enthalpy
fluxes due to moisture evaporation) are not evaluated by the program and
would have to be calculated from the printed results.
74
APPENDIX E
COMPUTER PROGRAM DBSCRIPTION
A. FUNCTION OF MAIN- AND SUBPROGRAM
The MAIN-program and subroutines are written in FORTRAN - and FAP-
language and can be run at any IBM 709 - installation (16K or 321) under
FMS control. The explicit subroutines aret
SUBP
DOUBIN
.DTAD, TAB
PULSE
TARA
C194NGE
F2R4
All other subroutines are FMS 709 library programs.
1. 14AIN Program
The flow of control is shown in Figure 2.7.
Any number of data set, can be nandled in one run.
First, the equilibrium data for cloth are tead in, to be used for
all data sets.
Next, a set of data is read. The calculation starts with the deter-
minatirm of the relative irradiation intensity followed by phase (a) of
the alterrtting scheme (2.12), whaich establishes the distribution of
temperatures. Based on the new temperature values, the variable coefficients
C and D of equation (2.5)' are found by interpolation of the tabulated
data.
Hereafter, phase (b) is solved for the pressure profile, assuming
that the boundary condition (2.6)' is valid, which implies condensation
of moisture on the skin surface. A test for this condition follows. Lf
it shows no condensation, the pressure calculation is repeated assuming
75
this subroutine determines the relative irradiation intensity Io(Go)/Iomaxand records it.
5. PARA
The input parameters pertaining to irradiation intensity and pulse
shape are interpreted and printed in dimensionless and absolute terms.
6. VZ
This subroutine computes, at the end of a run, the total irradiation
energy received in the cases of a step function or a thermonuclear pulse,
(equations of Table 2.1).
7. CHUGE
With CALL CHANGE(l), the purpose of this subprOgr&a is threefolds
1. To record the number of dry cloth slices.
2. Optional: to determine the maximum of the heat content of the skin
above a given critical temperature level, attained at any time (equation 4.1).
3. Optional: to vary the size of time steps at prescribed dimensionless
times by means of altering the modulus X.. Any number of such changes is
possible. The use of this procedure lies in the facility to reduce the
time step size near the enm c a square wave of irradiation, and to increase
it at a later time again. - Any rew value for MA must be a multiple of the
original one. The functions 2 and 3 are only activated by special data
cards.
3. ."OIINE ThLB CONSUWP7ON
The amount of machine time used per time step depends mainly on the
number of cloth slices, since the determination of pressure profiles
requires most of the work. The approximate expense of computer time is
given below:
No. of Cloth Slices Machine Time / Double Time Step (Sec,)
2 2
6 2- 26
16 4 -
77
Using the 6-slice model with a modulus 14 A 5.0, a doubLe time step is2A9° x 0.0111, which corresponds to 2e9 w 0.0272 sec (with 0,40 w
(LWX/k) a 2.45). The ratio of the micnine time scale to the real time
scale is,
machine time . ?n 05real tine
in other wrds, a second of real time requires 1.2 - 1.6 minutes of computer
time,
74%
C 05011, &SALL I IAIOTDAIII C4,40.1157
C 09-La M $00 POO 051 V a " M&IA7I0S 1 1la L SI fr. IC M Qfl 1 .11 At. SCWa. 0,41A1.CIAS'lAO .F0A.iA13A&.I0S.01550.
C PL5!'.e 1.SSOANW114 00 $01,305N maila0 SYSTE I VOLA 3101* 0*. 11 -AUGo' ST101. Q.MitQ*L. . lot
C ALI1wlLA7E IOWL!CJT I A#M P IAY.AIIM MA A06
OiSL.r Z, .a5C0Io. :1AI.0s 0 1111*.1opwall). 00350640
7.131 r r 1A.(1013111I1.l. .0"110"10003 1 I~' .fO P I 1,AOES 1.A~. 11liI 1a.A3501#CIAwd1.p.AA ,(.w0.0 101MAI 1
I /VA,:I CIO0* i~S1: : 1.16 0C0...111.41 1~0PS.510
10.AC T.CI.40.SS0.V1.050CIIII.00.C.I l.(&I(1*.AIMo11 50111001
CW~~1 PC.10 4004116
1004s Ac57?MI1 .. S10 10S I (00(501004 RIS (33. AllS. I 0480 Kv .111? 0*1000*ýMA loaw (O GA.9060A.90CA .'INo ?.9a tas film *L?.AIt " "1 00017
A IM 500134 *I11 .OPO4 ft"1 1 I0M10S0 ~ .I04 SC010c 0 1S0A "4.. S AI ftim 110303Soo FASS"AllI"OU l 041 4130 I i a a . o aI o " n . A A 403 100
1011,11 -010 1 061" "1`2 1 0" 01 30. 01011 1 140 AI most1* 11S IMS NOO I0*
C, f.4S501L. V ISROAIAIau CLOI"SVCO-.IM *A Woo 0000
3.. 50l (I. *.I?510 WIN 14%00/0 ..D *.".INSC Z:0
104 AOSAIIAFOII:001000:0041 $OOSA IIIJ. 44144=12
411 03 00 01.00 10MAI0a""
00 1111-0 501500.5Do to. 11.2.1 010410100
T1 4. 0 " I5 0 4
AICD 0 14G 141A. Ou06 ,0S "51"0*1
500 Q!1AM A"
MACIS 0*350141SOCf IA MOW(00*3OSI 4301
WHMI 81100bl a~.*U.V0 "a I40Si~9,W.%lm fm1s04wII00lsQ!l 40 IA03030103$t lKL DI00.90.90 5G00
$709 ucl NOh.CI3 54 140109900100111.111 .(L0CAP.SA.A.00.AASI 001 l00
M. IVQVO&0CIO NOY,0(LI.CSII.0/CI 00 1000
SOS~A I Wait,5C00505
ASOS C0I.111 I 0*85t IIJ%*dLWI NI0 MA No"050500
504 '30*lMA
MA.550 =9"SI
OW .....P;, 4pa. CAin vobue. Ibion um. A. I a Na lwiC01Il,1. 14001 (.4180 0*10a.
afto "1 .330*Cw 5085"0
IS IO.C t
II(POCIO/ ",a Noi~.78 a.. 4~
.00050 aC '*.20.08018,.(8 0104
6060 CAL,. P0..0 A. I .0004SE 087 62.1A7104 6O.*0()AJI (40171 " 6410 1 a,
C OOTI6*A. ýIfF 1,171 CALC ItIOL0101.00 l88 l.0 644180812AI il '
802 00 80 "A8* No801I . IW T.8.841
go, 00 2410 180 *80a" 8A1.7'll,,.4ll.Jl-.3PI.8 to" 4. M At1.1 CI-L ls I N4101121 0* 10- 708 II840 8 10 CVI.IA V b 6ROI41.2
848.644-041 " I o "
00 200 1*.42C A A461201
081.AA87 I 4410 b2aU88.1 "A4U0.00 6484024
14.10.41611 041012"1
F1A88444 I N I as8001P160(84C "A411.1 I "" I1I
VO 141 28285 6&b NAlSAE"40100008 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N Il1822.0.04)80
as 8k.8. MAI4""",
48*4. Fal406800
6 80880 dat4111041" '1
go80147 .. 8.18 ."aft18 6460061044 0 4144110 4 41 W80.64184AIIVAI' 4 1468
48K 4874811.114411'"1 "Col I 1 1 4OHM, 641M88
808 114U a0I a1.144" 1 .118 CASEVall04N
,A 0 10641 ,118
Do0 So 84.04 Im me, soJ68 64804016
08 711lI.Al04J0141A8.0 8188
10 .8.04 .21 4681
C 64498441 I7FOG89 CAI.C 441004C CAoLk =080 loll It08A11884 $Wso400 480
00 ~ ~ 18o "0'1111.l.81I .'009I. 1111 64101
$a (80.410~ IIA1 9 1 '* . P& 1 9106 ./(wC81 49809118 64168016
a" . : .%LAIC80l8 64I114807161
84k 704 6480
No 880.l 1678 6484001,as
04 0" .. 88A4t;C 44168141 00 1 a CI $.l'6.80,(l88 "is=$684
a, NoC*II44.788I, 1( 44160818
40BA- 7 N' 8 8. :10,411060
C 48 00.4 660 841881188 LIS&"ANlp.81.8181 go4868068.:*
00. 644180168"I"
44 . .0 N0 10 6860
I~~ ~ l7~ 041101C (44444841048a Ago N.08 6284194
SA 684 9 a I8 PI64882408l8.84V808081(9 in*,4*2.988.(84 8404 so
G.M iMA I 4 I OAA4I -*A 9101020
90 90 A.4098 410,8
O0 98 "I449C 494mJ481.9.A 1.9 40414
8l~l.8l988 I4"t1
Wt90190sIL PA(88.109 ,808ILA IN DAY JIL81(8J 9190218
DO I- . *l.ftA. M94901Is
:4 - MA I he of
84 IF 4CO-*7 8.489.100 011480281
96 If 1.1,94 65941M90INOR4
80 1*8 0.1,9 !too38
888 1.(41 ^A190119
ti90.11*11.11t4 "A I "' iC AlCo9A8 847T .1.979 JL!. (9794f1947 948. CAST. R 4941 149194 "IN I9894901C *,"A4 I9'A1 _09 p.. i78 PIA"F " ..088 9489
Am"l NA4I8 II 91941
189 CALL. &.10 948948.7.
GON7:10-987( 60190.94001.819 1490C 8108(479 (910 It 041-17.0174994
CALL478 9191 4.
88 C4.8 994t TOA940148o9 pol0 ulo 11 1141,1,101 SII1419C 08 1.u ? 804 C404-401 MA7 91901 48
CAIL. CKAWAIV "A 940894GG T8 9el 94194618
"0Dm"44 aft988 0444891804081. WG18.1884.7 088*8888. 8300
PV.C 10C08NO1 s Cm .08. .78.I8.1.88.498.01AA1943.9.4..7 .PA.C.&,top*$"
9 C1 84..44 88408948tD8C.I a .CAIIT cI.a.1.4 WpiAt UM4. I t47 t4,44 II"A $'IAIfatA.I1 Af440.91899&U4 890 34.
844 004l97( 041.6111" 788047806G 89 CLOT* 4941 "48o .8187. 0846944
a19848. ID"0.8 8i4 7.8418 8.08.8.194.6 .s co".8.91 9044 C 14803408, 808.8 441 1 @ S0o.8 8863008
809 PINWORM"7 1.VCLIL 88.07 80101100*4
80 700 o09*
88 0 0941. 8*8.1.8 .?*-PAO 1.
,I 8 CAL 484914 8088941I
8* CALL~ U00110746I87llI.8PAID,$ 8.88.88 88463i949*o
z .C% 0 14488 ,1 ".IN,884,0188l3188I 8880394I44, 14007.*1.84,19(l; 0.408908 (ClI8.ll7,.7%fob *. (k 0LII.889(0 FIR9(I8.4*w88 8 TRIAL9488
94. 8~w 8(04
To 984 *8.70.408403944
pi MAC.S 1000L14 ..4 + 1 SL4()O
to 70)0A0 &900000.10)I004~0Q V:Ood
?a1O 9j. Io*384AjtJ1.#4.jII /4A0AI.I i .1.900
0043 J.1 .008
4* 9).0*),1.1fi-1.14094C S P.070:0
*044 0000.95N 4 61110.9 0064
94 :4 111us11.U~dI .00.9
.4 9 &':00 8.0,0069PC OILY,.~7)i/4MI)0C5 3,4,80070
A L4.~0 '.084*09 048N44 biu9307
00 94 listRA."4 84800I73
i9'*041'~~& 9..3 48007',c 1111tA9OIAtS 90088448 PW&09) 14 MY7 &433,80 14001111
@3 08C0900'1191 u39071100904 JAI00 :408:60
91.1 *490048)
1 0'7 011" Of l~cif SO CO11041190. O089889.100 PM0 7 CA..C 300
9 o i00* =9.1S1110 AL 00::;,W W:0 *0.9.3)99001
loos* £. I ..(001A8.) "4100087a0"00 ail3 )000A.08 9.80:840, .0)091,)1,91**97.) CRIOAi.),11.1 4400000
IF 4 9)"0891-00IOC.1 a i 10.8111.411 63=0:00
.140 40.0 880W"9091,4-41. 114,100004,8)9)390. 8W41090094011t .44 6040101116
0400(008N 6104100110
c~ HT 40170 Si7ASII (84087)0 9.Iif 001049.00)8.0090000.)*9C00I 616800)0
I8 888)) 80*))9.00
"talks0)U440083 "*" I/I).9.00)). I 40oil 4
00 s8 I04. '".0914.
09 .498)
,A I0 WOO08lit00 13 .4.4.A)90)3*.- "01011:)
4 8404)4)7al CAOI.C C4809glo 9)101, l0ei" 8)0)400 to11411.6410.64106.4111 4490
4100 10)09 -06 000)N4
70)5,74,4900.01111
10, 'A",) CIlf 6.10.40 b0)0I)is
'I o w0 . " I" ,0 ) "I
400 W40901.6
40 '000.344.0 Os0409 fil,.l-pits 0)9(01.308 .=643,
4K
94 012s0112 CLA -11.14T ;L OOTO0122
I .A TAo 0*012!ITO OELIA: 1421211. DILT 1*8l2
ILA -o,0002
AIo Dope 01 A601190
ITO 0 i~ A,0A t4001:1?
0112 (LA 4.4* CIAOL,
(LA .9~ 01A0115
CIA :512. 0148101I
0lso (gLA -. 4 A.800I110 ; of tA#0140CI.A -44.i TA0,01%Il LAST. t*04
$TO AllI0400CL DTAN0146
AN1 10 Dr410140
IrA 0. DOT400141ITA at) OIA119140
SIL 00m9o tABMl,A0 O2 TA0010Ir .141 0tA4IO .
5Th 2102 Ol*0019JA 008. 0ta'0" ". la *e *TA"IO:
CLA a.. O="!."01*0 of raoif1 00 0tA*01ItA OIA01681*8
)g* .;. A401642*Sf0 LISt OTA8014ILA D"0 0*840IO LIST 01*001*
IRA 0 1 orA00I4
it 6" :11, 1 tA= 161
,sto ON t*0,LiLItT PLon& OtLOSINLIAT #1 Pi 14200IO O*0, A TS OF 040101176Lilt %L I *tA00I"
LIStI pLO *0LIT 0400p1it#2 0.0.2 Ot*0100s
A2 Pit *-"^M". 001614 O AV. I0 All( ot0,450.A-f pit -0.0 .O 1401 N 011 a FWMIo 14 load ta,&"&@
*1..0#2 0.0.0 *1Pý.O*. IF A is A 0101.2 1440 OlLOivIlA",2 # 1 000,0#Olt04OA00
00 'LI *00*000M.O A0094 0*9*0
0140 I uakD2M00aIll #20 gO~oo 10c 1 0 00 or All.&# 01*001
OILA it INC 9101"t T0 LOG HA~T V tAGL 1 Cr4001.AOC: To 44.1 9 14 SAM :*4 t81*004 020 *
AMO 14A 00.0 C40080
X01*0 ITO 0041 0, a..go0 0 of A",:,.
count OAt** 00
090M 6 r,4 .1 'As~ 900040
80 40" 1 LA tI"Ad I 'AS 0000ago LCOA-I~ 'ONAII0 LOG OF LIST Ad0 sooOAS I00a00*01.411000
01 0N01 L.t 00*0 Ao"", TAP go"
tao to Com.1.*oT F:C 08 :0" OV R UAVN FLOW0410, .00"'
14,1 OAEEoo An, n EM I 1A 00 1MNI LIST ISI 1, SOLN Is 600 the Go'!
REM* LI? OE l 1808TAG 0':)41E1 LIST I IE*I-Q(O7A71 OGF ListEI A 001814 LES V ** ý2J LCIEGIS 00 1 1. 1AUroll
at . -TO OF '" Ta0 T
4104 LFi TAO 003L&0.TUN Ll 1 188 001.
RAN (. 0.1 TAO4 003)
Ran LIST 1EU. Ri*E1418IA AR 00*8
'As LIST 44O 04,12
010T 1 a-f - "tAo 0023
18 I L04.1.1. 8LT IE .LA010 004b
Ls OP *LOC OF A In' I081 Ad 0033
COA a00 " 808 ""TAB.A..M 0011.31)Alt 1LO. 10 8004T
IRA LOCIEM OF I70900ITO is .. TAO G lt LF 000
CLAD TABR 0080F).O 4l Aioij"l TAO 0040
1*30 II Jll. 1L 80uaw 00A8 0016 lg ao808J130 TEA @.In3. LOG4001 ? TAN 00i9
U:0 lo 8.. 0( 0.*1700. TAG 0040At IIIjoa I J uo~~g~~~ TAB 0041its CLA a,.1. 1*8.0 ITO00
100 LAOgw 8IA* 0. 004S01*9 g~ 'JE84.0 VE5.1,)VOLA 1TAO 0081
J10014 0 I10A 0034810 ~ ~ ~ o~ Asj~ 00810 0 40-700601
it: 10 11..1 G.0 O11A 30. TOOs 0"0 10LAB6 8e J1.8 100o 0000 1
i)8 (4.0 81.3 1iaet1M f:T 00008J Te CL Aomin 10.0.8 T.AO ROSS
J3e too 41.1. T00o OFA043s"Gs13 lo 1)8.8$-.1 088.1 AO 4000.0I 9 P. AB 001
1)9s ( 80.0.8A TAG 80
LAD 989 .4 TAO 00"4
FI ~TAB Age,
0.0T'A 0018170 is*
TI07
jig me. 1 .1 1101 IEll "0E1E2,8 079.00. C . ,lAB 9007
(l.A Pm, 0.0100T0. o; it @700 1,. ',G 10000
ITG Comem**. 70 0.8 1 0078
La I181.1114,.1 TAO 0001BCA? 1 00700
&to 107 It.B 000,ow. ow-0. 'As10 Oslo810 09
18* ~o 8P84oO~ ~EO~lol TOs09
GL *0 .. I*E0 FAR DOR
4.0910. L100$8 A 009)
4.00 8*0eso0.0 8 . 100 seesOFT.j~ 10069to
180 CN.. TnAO 890s
CLA -List0 FAB logs
089 4144.4* 'asl 908 M al 00"Be
I10 88 0. TAB 0*0*
010 CONFIRM as, Se- 08pa
its 0. 10 04110,:: 121:1 AR OFw LEON ?" 40(110 *AB
Aft000110
All I1444011 0f A TAIILF TOO 0113VTA J1 TAO 011.* TA J13 IA CI" akSdA 410 TAS 0116M0 JI0 TAO 013?
I ,A j,119 T AO 0 AIILA -J.. TAs 0130
ILA ;5.4 TA: 0,asI T 0 taO 6186ADD 0(^j TAO "110MITO 'lAOs14WS0 0.
TAO% 01:Alt 10 TA108"TA I.TA,03ILA A00 CC 010 IOLTA XtAO 0110
ITO 4? TA 0121ITO J14 IAO 015PITO 401TAO0
ILA 0*0 *ILTA V in act A 03ITO *J4 TAO 0130
TO4338 TAO 01*0.10 9.1 T004Q.I TA 01 *41LOG 000001.1 TAOs1
AL. IT; TAO 0300"ITO CO.000o2 14K/41 DALTA3 TAs 0141
000 00.0 wA00
LOG00 c0.1.3 IA.~oMTy ". TAO 13
14.1 1?'Ot- TAOIILV ?Im1a"01s
ATD 43?L 1.4501ILA IT TAG 0330
toO43 TAAO 10IN3 (A C000m. ~ TA 0100ADD-.0TA 0101ITV:~ 3
A 01"3I I0~*TO00
JIM LA -6.6 TA 0*0
LAI13TA 01001opV INSTA 0109114 ;,~- TAO 0?1
TO40 TAO 01101'TOa3 TAO ITJill CLA - TOOII,.l TAO 0110LI*17. TXASO.(T0SISS1
0 4 1031Tm TAON11LII 4:1pfo.1 0 'IClTT TA 10110
PLA Jae* TAO all:ATO
46TA 00ILA (0006
TAO 01101
(L. CO TA 01414104 00
I"TA 00
I46 TO A0 ma 09
ANLI t0. 0I30. TAO 0..01400 1000. 01" 03:00"00, 0.3 I1. 00000. 01
"T 1 3 000100.0 TAO *0
004 3.0 LO46TI24 0A00S03 00TG4Ol30 1 36 I .. 0.0.014 16.01a1 106 0.0. 4... TAOlibV NW 0303
,I . TAG 0d*&:1 :13,6 0.03 0.0.0 1TAO CA*#
II 916 0 fi00 $00010 4 00 TAN 3
too, #.::I' TAO 01000
CAO (00TAO 9818
060 934 TAG 041. 0060414 06000116
,.,T. *21. TAII oil?
TAS 'VON 5114 TAO 01
MOIN P0 & TýAO0018
C ~O1144,. TO COWJti IL0. £ISAAIATIOR IN01(451I IWjIOgWAK U&C ASpl e(ti*0 OF TIME MLAIAA
IT001(4514*01 A41.00100IA~5.~WO.A1O,~l..I1. SLE
ALI Is.COP .11 101 ft0t.VI .T .0spoi 10.111 .0011.EvPo0v.I0Cg ftLs~e*9*1V'(0101001 W0.hCW. 00(P~O0T.0.I~.I.A 5.6
=V491.C1.AC .VtCLBOKInl.6..CI I.11"364 I .I .Comu4DIl .04.91AOI.C0.E*0EO~d.EomA.OOOATIM"a. 1ECNE. fiftl. OV6.&P ML~rni.
COPOM PVA4T.fftIA PUA*E04C COV"1I6 T1,10 - RAO. JMTEOIITT/0. RAD.IstEOEIT. OKU08C PCIT 1.05TI~ I.E0DAA TIME PU0LAW111
TI.1.-T00TMAR PIO18045C 10Au10 ~4 TE 11,01E WAV.141011M.1WVE.31 WAVE taS~
6O to 84 PmA68UC "0481 WAvE 910.86451
a AP if log - TCWAAI 10.11.11 9048000*
40 TO as P014660416Is OVOY 0 .0 PUA1427l
40 To p 10 00446WATSaUosioE4 WAVI 4.54"864
3 IF is*[O - toorns 11.1*.14 P&M4860*0
10 to 20SWSO16 IF ",maTIMMC~o* 1.10.10 910.8645Is It orIoETINcAil 14401.15 010.860
C floE move Ov0.4054
So TOVPIATM/M 16407006see
do to 0 0410166104&
so VOIV AL528 * 41 1.4.5 86
14 11 #let:4 1.45 811.11.&1 AA.*iS~l
1 144 1. Alow W&M
s00a..0s MET&W
*Moslem "A" 100S.0W &lTA 01410. 't1.1 W#WM Pak""$0MIA00 4DI~5M&IllE6.A1~IF5I.A0s MO
01,11 ". foS5l.C6105.'146.01.801(1 to.gEot*5.A5GIiwhll~ tools#OtCM4TI31.CIIO.515105555.P
0100 8. ~.0?.ES.C0.TIGO" 1.86TE.VAAIU. fO O
1 010 1.Sa0 OllealS. 01108
409,fl. VI 1 940,0IMg.I rw140145 fam11IY.V..5sC&/I na. t06is*P~T 14.ma itE 5.8 IOSSW* VM0590.0WOT "M 000"664aOfI CdgW 001 OP O 040160A.1
Pea-I 8554 TM.O.P..~ IN ~IONIC *IST i0.S prng.4o
:$"M "CALA *0~a
tia"' VA4I a 1 to 15. $&* *. S4. 4 CIGEC .06.40A tic40M
850PEIIU. etl.0000elf' .418 0AIIOCO .04.0040 A"/C'0eE
I" OO V0IISIO Ilia Liao, "1 .. 110.6.1911 UCU~t .1.4.40 EEOrESM"10 1100V *0* *Asian
008 PdIo limit PAUMOOS'tg .014140 G
?~.I0TOPSET45. Goo
r AS &O0.OTE (8 0 1Of P#MS :ARAGO3AT(80446.Tk*0.tAOJC1R P49*0(3
C Eno 0 OF PAE4SI 0 DIST00190?0H AOVL F04Hk W1AV O4) I*0501
C 09?(4AVA" A9 ?9APUCtAL4 ($801., O10.o.130 AMI ASU00.4-A"mu98 OF AAMIP 0.AQACOAO
p0.I.T(.7AM/18(099 AEAOOA I
C o0* a ON$% LEVEL PA8AOOI19SO19.10C4@?400009 '00440)
C "1"A.110.1 1.00 0AMAGO99C1 18107.07 1 004f 0079 'AnA0047
pin"A.I *914 Gy81. (1401.14.85 A180 -049U1 uft A0033 0T 9..02.0:3.49041JLI KoMA-0
80 To 30. 00)0
C COMPITIO A? , , 0 OF PW IS3 PARA",:0
C OU0A.1010P 4*00CM) 10 1103.40337,SIX.3)M9.1COOL3U 90*40009
330 0909 90804840
CI TO I09 PA810041O
3 01, 0. 1 1 . 1 5 0 1 T . 4 ,0AA A
(10 0.bA .5 .1.1,JOIK Y A09 A49404308 0900?I 000. 8004.09 004" 0400f
I0V009 :10 4*.
" 09I 9 t091040100 04.194071
310 TOY 64030.0.00.44 004.*1 A 0444
.4 to I3011,49.406004 :0*AA970
1440119? 34.!!n00048
&IslUllo&CO"1M 0HA8*0(8 04*41099
C 1: 1 1(1894 0(09~ f(1908Of04 COY 44CSC IV:889803a o. It11 CAM108 11C0"0 181T 69019kYM H N1 98? " OF71 "I.N01 It *8900
C IN904T19810. P18.0.0909 Ing %OWL" OAVA COAJI09. 11% "A4. MI4? CHAN~80C C TEX Of Ing ORION 80091 7-CRI?, ATTAINED AT A8Y 1109. WI190..4 C19A900
C (CZ0o91. (9*01C 3.791 19049*081S £190 S (1981 9191 0414.46 (84 to A WIN9 Mug.0 A" 04..
C I-O PAI.T *8a I , ' .9 (OPA A0.A,1-(CAND 3 F 031040.1. *MA AA0 (90080C 0 9. a v 0 .48. 8 . . T.0((9 4. L3)9.4*40 090.481. (403 404909.
*11 ITT,. M& ) .041* 09?A bi f A C-.. 04090C ("A4011i0
t0o 001.9199001 *0P9000.A 000 080T9000050810. (4 l00141009,(9(08..OOt.C000.80008,A0001,019909. 94A019
090"191, T1900.30904 T.90.40.P19,1A00.8(.,90 (04488033(9,C90(H.003. .0..:0.11,l0.0."'9. &Wg 40.90180 -C OO.CL*.CAP.(1449S800
00.489. *&:8,ICMM. 3VO1.C11819.ICJ8. 0 1.41401.93C8TAW(1.9IN .. (194080*19.69*~~ ....9) .199*619....(3. 119"0*.109(19,19,790.9*79 (19408089M19186901a PP 1T0A (Con49t.Le0400 o31 C191903-C*03.P 07.49109 10 P0941 *PTAMPAs 419. (4090*
HN0 TO L 09.0.A," (1480
"9 0919 19A.(9..9.0"8C19 IFA194140O KNTOIAO S0*b 1 HAM
H, TO .83 CMOA803
a'0690~jMh~j C"64CAI QF6O.4 214114'15 a"&AD -(9980 .90.0X (948905
019070*0,(3 H 30.(10 8040'(190430
39A194.0. (194N00900690940li .44891.49 O*14. .81.199 (48019"9104 *39(09(81 08901V3 iot:*00.9 (098909
6 OAP 09(109.199. 70.8.0 044404
70 " 9C21111T(19.1 18819.00.10 C"988t0."
cm rc4air CAA05
10 to 34'I mVcmrims so.30.41 C"ANi001)
' w CA4C 443734*G11 C..A40,7$
A1 34" 106734 O C-140011
C.,Aftoos
a C* 0C.4 ((4 40i 4' : V k CI/A007Is. 4(* N 'P4 44?UDi
(4493C L W 4 114eC.,.. 11.40074d
300 . 4471. 4.c.a~~ 4 9 0 044 CIMA14Oo40 S0300 0. a ~.4C mo .o C444040
A30 IX 40.oa.3u C-AND00003 1 1404 C N, 33.3 0.3 C M3 A40 G0 4
440C444A00e
It4 I 70= 12= I01.10643 C03M104?*
'p - -14
14*Ae(" 10447140 SLAV C*600. 10, No01"
C.414034j
040 10000?C,4 10 onril C-Aftooss
COM"40003934v" ( ,430C ~ 334 304.*C 104939
C4 10,10 A..3 ., 40334
004~~= ~043,(4033:70-3:,
C"Nft43j
304 ilrOA. 1 0, Ila. 01. 10 C K940 g.*
a 4 703 4 lo Af C-Aft4a*
400.4440"
I0 4 g 0
*I . C 1 . 3 4 C NA4 013.i03 7Afte044.5
C"'40 1 1
34 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ &?Cro (04
4ff 10( /0(341 1 434110
I ~ ~ ~ ~ " _____________f___________
a00LTI1CODCCqIto$01AMI.!III.GlIItA019 00a1 CO) ! ,( I I* M9E21ll~lIl*01.* 0 0000
901 6 vi (1.6.9 VI.Pt 1 yT.~0,4A91.A.C1N1Mn.1t 11 @1,,C.)1 Tmp4 1wG*lc0,01 .~0.t1 aIaof.1110 .l0Cl10. 1400
1T.I2ft AE.,,MAS.O.M, WA ?. I.IAIII," I,0:AA.,A0 A..5.*.0C..1 . £0r "00
41004W.C00OC.CO D.. 14A P0 . S0Aslsa. Ap. W14 3.T O C~0. Vol 1.CM . C0T19 1 04001
sa0 710: 111?1"0*l#DI 0 0. 11,A. Is .I ~ ~ ~ .A £011.i.T"0010
la90 0.4 ,A . V 020?fi o~ xIo 014" .C IT C o~ 10. 0 13"C" . mols94U MOAINS.TAs ,01404".? If kal.Ej 40*01.51a 100 0101
00201f U11000.mOG 0 011Go*3 to000010a.
I IFg" W4 Uavill0 10.0.2 "* IT.
f010401T Io0*a30 III "0at0*
III rat1 JL TOTAL4 EM.1310 000013 0000" 440;C66A '
10 4. too0.4 . 01.6&0 046 0016
A 0 O 1 0 10 " I,
100~ 016~ .0lIs-1-.,1 n "340)
Ile 004
1*14? Ir000 1A*0 I-, I05 I,",0 0103
195001CAL 0 .IT (0*. I*010flop0 4
Is
APPENDIX F
SUMMARY OF COMPUT] SOLUTIONS (iN MOIST CLOTH - SKIN SIMULANT SYSM4The theoretical results for the temperature response of the moistopaque cloth - skin s3mulanZ system are summarized in the foylowingdiagrams. The listings of the num-icagl -.olutions and the master diagramsare in the files of the Fuels Research Laboratory, Department of Chaeical
Engineering, MIT.
For reference see List of Figures.
92
4' �.
ii q B
fV� g - g�j;� �u . �' 0
Ui'-p. -- z.U I
aI a
- �
I-. :3 -'-' 4;
zU
Si
I
'� �j jj� U.
I;Iii �
g
a
q
IU.
92
000
10 0
00
llb
94
?�'4 ., -� � t,'�,-.. -'
- z
,,,-1,!r 2 a-.
I � 044..
4-,204.-
EI *.OS N
000 -N IoOO 0 1
L -__ 2.5
� we,
I.4444e4 �j
- 90 q
(201- *w.iae�2i�. 'J/j? � *w4..eae� p.z�euw�j 0 h.
TITTT1 FFF TFFFFTFrFT rrFrTr1rTT�h -.
24-
ill S i- 6-�i
* 0
21 8I-
IEl.
a
we
o 0 0d �
� 02,1.9 8*.u *Ca*.�*� 41'gSw464
x' 0
0( Z
0 0,u
0~ 0 00
00 0 )-
JJ
W 4
-L lo-
I -
CO0 10 0
4.'2
D0mwftou Skin Depth X* -0Le. u~ 1,
0.7
~0.6-
050
0.4
0.3-
0.
0 1.0 2.0 W 4A) &0 6.0 7.0 60 to 10.0 110 120 123
Oimm..eImaU T.um, 0Fit USl EFFECT OF CLOTH OIATHERUANCY ON THE HEAT TRANSFER TO THE SKIM SIULANT
s I If0.6-Q 20 &.0
0..0.7-
.r .42
Dwssiles SwM Depth
0o.4
)(1-0.45
02-
0.I1
Lo 21c &0 40 &0 6.0 .0 as 910 10.0 ILO 12.0
OimoensAssuo 7,4Ir,eFlO 1.14 EFFICT OF CLOT" DIAT'IEftUAW.Y ON THE HEAT TRANSFER TO THE $91N SIMAULANT
97
- 2 0 -2'006o e-0015
1. 002 002
Its
IJ.16 Epc'o OJIeg m hR I,.1
?pq S I1A. U IMf
a Ove~s celot
,t , Whllt (%WIN CWI)
I /I
0.09 /.
0 .1~e 0 .1 t 1
fie:.:11 IFPIECT Of 4LISTE H,0 SO CLOT11 ift *H ; CATTRASFE TOTht W1111SIMULANT
JUT W
al0..40.0
11.0- 4
1.0 . 00
A .4. 01 5
CIAUGI Lyo AQA CAh ETIA ( TOSNL t
I.00
U*Ol P1,ho C" AC. Wor
4 9
0 k9
-41
I I .LM I I I I LII.~V *S' *b8SbW 6I~w,,70 I
- T~ii ii Ii00
H i l l I - II1
2- 2
00,,
.-*10.-
*44
4;_ __ _ _ Ise
S -*~y m~ *JI~j~ II.mie,~dw,
o~W
IL
;k.0 -
.. ......
a'4L
102~
Skin Doplh
X, -O.038 cm
.00
I00
0 xermnalUt
U:U
0.F
Demooo~fenwlefl Ti* A#: a 104
FIG JISCMPARSONOF EPERIENTL RESLT$ON DRY OP4Ec
'10
10"'
0-5 BhA Ifvro
0.5 0,0L 1.Cto
FIB. 1*6 UMDERMUM tiw~m 0. 5 CWUSaSI SMloon x~TO O-SIMMWAV ***TIU uuCC~aEKPCI0 P45E
Jodo
O. -.m Nucear, trw i ,A GoO 0
Q0404
0�-
III
0 0
L *iA.�ae4a.A wgq �ice
7
PITY
ANSI
10'
mw
firi
010
,.' h, asI * II aI_ " •*w U
i •I l i r- I •
" . *- " . .'. ' ' ,"UI
II N I II *
q ; •-' .' •
I-. ,- 'I ' " .. • ..,. I,.."" (m '* "10 -• 4
S•. l I - ---- -le
S . . ,.,14,. .. o.~: 1. • /
•" ,•" " Z .,+ ;+ :, "+i
I08
-p -33'U);~ 3
>- 0 a a a a aU) ;" Vi Vi a i i
zI0Ip. 6 1
* 2
0~~ -v vi
IL-*
* * 10I
--FIIG. 2.? FMLO*IW-CHLAORTr 4CSFIMAI$NIMULR~OG;RASMSF
*bass for'4.
Affor. few,
ai~
set;$A' *0 .1 =
0( .121" )"' 4 c . z
cal. prsw
494.11.3.4-p r i o t t " A r s . .4
* 4. m
g *ti. t
ag -- I ALi~D(press*")Oak". 0, Gsposmpefa s
a " & J ~ s o s t s " o 1 1 0
cus v-moit, lsss" asil
Rum",W
FIG 2.0 FLOW-CHART OF SUPROUTINE SUBPMOIST CLOTH-SKIN SIMULANT SYSTEM
= 6" "use"pat, Colo. NMI00110110 d-ble it N.I.-
9 lattem .0 t.3 14
u4c. ""I -cwj*fw cloth L.11.0 -- Mit.4for skis
xx temp. ciaocaUslate skis ff.&.WLAIcoefficia-le ewe caff I call. ImiCWI-(W else 4 1 R.N.S.
we cle"t 04-Ay".2.96-a&woaiootlm focurelve sotmý
10.2 skirocalc ' it"Sed total 'P.Ces go
t Andic. samose)r g4dwc* 14 00.6161-3.16
Cale. act2.10J.- sdial "at
nista.tom4f*A twist W"26
(de 3
Project clock P*4,.til LOUjkL_ is W of to a I-P.ties was
boom" er cow. modest" Joel volimC1.411 A" 4IAd CRIT ? We mort.
gGic- GUUL' tomp, rise sidespt4we lost live step
rysom"tioe me. flow An ver cf 14call. DATL Ledle. 30 .1
AXS case. rodsce grid
0".4"tj.u-&.a Adams PAMp"40", is So"vo.$"44ýt to bevedery
Sis msac& - a asest ISOgetursive lots. - #sen 70 ad PIP06"tion (cc ".11A nT, log am stop
moor o".61sta. 95-4
is P83"A ties for to ="Miss@to .11 Is (ord"wo) (aso
di. 'y *lice$ .04 rat,2.tSgif -7 17
:.&C.Iato
odeentim ar
*1 04igdo. all? mat
ad"M"time
@SAMN.M. tiedInterval go
It, IA %m#vLld, so
orsel
Cv= . 0
on lawpt4em
cum. . S.848 CARD 7
1C2RIT I5 C10
31 2 .S1 1.sa1 CARD 4
I CO 1 I mpZr (WsIApar ony uSed [at trapezoidal
0 270 1'15 is 86 CURD3
*001im 284.1 1910.1, 5.'1 .1"?, .0333- 2.45' CARD aCUT ? CIS CAP 0m% NC U UUI
AD I clnI= IUU
* MS 06oftite 8 m card)
FIG 2.9 MAKE-UP OF RUN CARD DECK
112
\\ I\%
FiŽ~ 11 I113
00
's_
150
liI &AD" I _ __Sws esx~iw
0 0 0
00 0 0
00
__________ __________0
80410"1IUWSWN SS TT~k#A i
Ix-
0 9K
oold
011 ~ ww 46"011"
0
41 -
I-
1116
No
00
•jig.H- *i-~ o-.. , -- ,: l fil
-S. .~ wu.°
4 I, o
4.JIdIdII , I ,0• 0 o3i o 8
• 4 U1 ll i S .USs bi.liili ~ t
- !i a.
1',
0. -- - - - -
0.44
I 0. 0-1 0 4 . . .
/IMM* INEST a~lb~o
0.0
0.0
0,D
040
0.0 L - - -
0 05 1.0 2.0 7.5 36 5.5 AID
FIG 220 TEMPRATURE ot5poeis" Of A MOIST oftow Q.O~jffSAM9 SIUIAAT SYSTEM IWLU6PFCC Of IR~IWADMTIO PICuRAUf P~gf AftA 0.546 cgI/cm* so
go -- 4-
-*o I \
.4 ...-.I -/ .. .................... \ .--, ....... ..., -.... ...................- ,* I
02
0• 0 \ J I ..5 10 Is• 20 Te .25 3.0 3:5 4,0
i IRRAiDIATION INTENSlITY 0IT•I"BT *N
022
I
0,04- / *'
o
00 Os 10 is 20 25 3.0 35 40
Om*moss Tim 0,
F I ,2.2I TEM 1 "ATIJIMfE rI4 I ~ 9 OF A MS I T OS U CLOTY"-
S SIMIJALAT SYSTEMi. INFLUENC OF IRRAIATION PULSESK*M; PVLS9 ARA 1.0 tol /c.lefe
i~v
0..
?F�-F �nvi- I
I .�: I �'I� I
HL 'I' I j�o� �C
1�
fij L13�� I ZZz
III' I.-
(A LA
� 4 LA LA
LJ2I � 5.LLL� V.
� N� - N
.± *��4OJ4Wj ��M9S 4�S '*IIUO�Uu �
0
(•�' �
I* I-
; ![3111j
41P/ I
0 jJ�JU N
20
do1
6i0
-V,,-
121
0 0
-Pi
I kl
I T4,17 -1-q
Phd
Vv
am."a ty "Olm.-
@0000 a 0 a ~ 0 0 0I
-no "Wooft
rr
... . ...
L I.
124.
O0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
125
YfT-rTrrrT-Fr-7- TTFr-0 0
LJ i I
-Fq 01 aa.
0 T F 0 0 0
~O O 000 0 0 0 0 a 0 -
III I t~~~~j ~ t .nu"s.g I~SOmWi
11111 I I I 1271 I
1 asd- WT" WA 900 W-
ac00 a0 0 0 a 0
. ..~ ........
vs e
vv ~1
Q6 i*
00 a
Ali
I ri3j0.%
129
~~- i~i
IIN
130
op
3tll
A2
1 313
z tf
I JJ
0- 0 a 01
133
APIENn!X G
MUILI1RIUM DAM% ON MOIST CLODI
This dat4 is used in the numerical solution of transient heat ar4
moisture transfer through cloth.
134
-4
:14 :1 C1,
mN &~ .7 40"'I 0 0 0 0,. 0 )*C 0
-4 a,
4flC 0 o~4 ~ ~ .
0
-41 -4 - 4n0 0 C',
A. 000
*; ; : Om M .4 00
go N 00 .0p
m N00o O Nq cm
Ct'-~ V ~ N O * . *a a An
* * * *9O~ . N 9CD
f q40 C4M40 . *y 0 0
. 0: , .4 0 0N ~ oo vOM dotOn O mm
.4 *IV 40 e MM. M
N foo g - IM0
Zq NO 0mC40m.
. V
po~d -~
11 hov- x
*~ ~ ~ ~ - do N ~ .4 WfC. **VI~CN p* mO. P4qr V O96 W-4 e t .4 * eq l C
ft Vt N*
arV! p
-cpa, '
e4 roim- 2 1o34
APPENr A H
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Buettner, K., "Etfects of Extreme Heat and Cold on lluwan Skin. ulr',J. of Applied Physiology, 5, 207 (1952).
2. Butler, C. P., Martin, S. B. and Lai, W., "Thermal Radiation Damageto Cullulosic Materials. Part II - Ignition of Alpha Cellulose bySquar•e Wave Exposure", Technical Report Iva. IR-135, V. S. NavalRadiological Defense Laboraory, San Francisco, California, 1956.
3. Chen, N. Y., and Jensen, W. P., "Skin Simulants with Depth Magnification",Technical Report No. 5 from Fuels Research Laboratory, MIT, ContractNOnr - 1841(00), March 15, 1957.
4, Chen, N. Y., and Jensen, W. i , "Heat Transfer to Skin Tirough ThermallyIrradiated Dry Cloth", Technical Report No. 6 from Fuels ResearchLaboratory, MIT, Contract NOnr - 1841(37), July 8, 1959.
5. Chet, N. Y., "Transient Heat and Moisture Transfer to Skin '4hroughThermally Irradiated Cloth", Technical Report No. 7 from Fuels ResearchLaboratory. MIT, Contract* NOnr - 1841(37) and No. DA 19-129-QM-454,Januar7 12, 1959.
6. de Lhery, G. P., Derksen, W. and Monahan, T. I., "Research Reportnn the Spectral Reflectance are Transmittance of Standard Fabricsfor Thermal Radiition Effects Studies", Lab. Project 5046-3, Part91, Final Report, Naval Material Laboratory, New York Naval Shipyard,Broo'klyn 1, New York, (1956).
7. Dietz: Leipzig Monatsch ',,. ile (1912); quoted in "Intern tionalCritical Tables", Vol. II, p. 237, Mc~raw-Hikl Book Co., Inc.,New York,(19Z7).
8. Bcktrrt, E. i. G., "Introduction to the Transfer of Heat and Mass",p. 160, McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, (194 .
9. Gardon. R., "Temperature Attained in Wood Exposed to High IntensityThermal Radiatioir, Technical Report No. 3, DIC Project 6797, FitelsResearch Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MassaLhusetts, (W-3).
10. Gardon, R., "Temperature Attained in Wood Exposed to High IntensityThermal Radiation, Appendix II, The MIT Solar Furnace", DIC Project6797, Fuels Research Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, (1953).
11. Gardon, i., "A Segmented-Mirror Solar Furntce for High IntensityThermal Radiation Studies", Rev. Sci. Instruments, 25, No. 5, p. 459,May 1954.
137
12. Ho leong, E., and Williams, M. E., "Surface Tenperatures in a Two-Layer Air-Spaced Slab System Irradiated from One Side", Technical:,eport No. 4, DIC Project No. 6797, Fuels Research Laboratory,MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1956.
13. Klei, H. R., "A Study of Unsteady State N-tural Convection for aVer tic Ll Plate", B. S. Thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering,MIT, Jmne 1957.
14. McAdams, 11. H., "Heat Transmission," Chapter III, 3rd Edition,McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New Yurk, 1954.
15. Moritz, A. R., and HIenriques, F. C., Jr., "Studies of Thermal Injury.II. The Relative Importance of Tiae and Surface Temperature in theCausation of Cutaneous Burns, Am. J. Path., 23, 645, (1947).
16. Moritz, A. R., "Studies of Thermal Injury, III. The Pathologyand Pathogenesis of Cutaneous Burns. An Experimental Study", An.J. Path. 23, 915 (1947).
17. Moritz, A. R., Henriques, F. C., Jr., Dutra, F. R., and Weisige,:,.J. R., "Studies of Thermal Imiay, IV. Au Exploration of Caa-lty-Producing Attributes of Conflagrations; Local and Ststemfic Lffectsof S,,icral Cu.aneous Exposure to Excessive Circumambient (Air)a*d Circumradiatt 'teat of "arying Duration and Intensity", Arch.Path., 43, 466 (1947).
18. Aichtmaer, R. D., "Difference Methods for Iritial-Value Problems",a.terscience Publishers, New York, 1957.
19. Schm!.dt. E., "PUppls Festschrift", Springer, Berlin, 1924,
20. Schmidt, E., "Forsch. Gebiett. )ngenieurx,13, 177, (1942).
21. Siegel, R., "Transient Free Convection from a Vertical Flat Plate",Trans. A. S. M. E., 80, 347 (1958).
22. Urquhart, A. X., and Williams, A. X., J, Tex. Inst., 15, T559,(1924,
23. Patter, J. P. Jr., "Trarmient Effects of a Time Varying ThermalPulje, " AFSWI' Report 71I 58-7, March 1958.
138