Upload
others
View
7
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Actuarial Valuation of Employee BenefitsImpact of Social Security Code and COVID 19
Presentation at WIRC of ICAIBy
Date: 18-04-2021 Time: 11 am to 12:30 pm
1
Mr. Jayesh D. PanditPRINCIPAL
FCA, CAA
Mr. Kartikey KandoiCONSULTANT ACTUARY
FCA, FIAI
2
Agenda
Introduction to Actuarial Valuation
KAP Insights - COVID-19 & the Impact
The Code on Social Security, 2020
Actuarial Valuation Assumptions - Analysis and Impact
Actuarial Valuation - Calculation Example
Practical points in Actuarial Valuation
Q&A and Open Forum Discussion
I n t r o d u c t i o n t o
A c t u a r i a l V a l u a t i o n
Introduction
Short Term
Post Employment
Other Long Term
Termination
Employee Benefits
• Fixed
contributions
• No benefit
guarantee
• Known cost for
employer
• Majority financial
risk borne by the
employee
Defined Benefit (DB) Defined Contribution (DC)
• Fixed Formulae
based Benefits
• Unknown cost for
employer
• Majority financial
risk borne by the
employer
4
Actuarial Valuation of Employee Benefits
Communication
5
Gratuity Eligibility as per 10 Employees
Leave Provisions as per Shops Establishment Act
Para 70 of AS 15/ Para 72 of Ind AS 19 – Gratuity Provision even service less than 5 years
AS 15 & Ind AS 19 - Provision as per Projected Unit Credit Method
Detailed Disclosure to Notes to Accounts
K A P I N S I G H T S
C O V I D - 1 9 & T H E I M P A C T
7
KAP
Impact of COVID-19 on Employee Benefits
01
0302
The analysis conducted:
• FY 2019 v/s FY 2020 - Q1
• FY 2019 v/s FY 2020 - H1
• FY 2019 v/s FY 2020 - 9M
Between 550,000 and 650,000 employees
Effect on
the count of
employees
Effect on
Patterns of
leave
accumulation
Effect on
salary
8
KAP
KAP
Pattern of Leavers and New Joinees
Reduction in attrition over the first 2 quarters, 3rd quarter slightly higher attrition.
7%
12%
24%
4%
7%
13%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
March to June March to September March to December
Attrition Rate as percentage of opening members
2019 2020
9
KAP
KAP
Pattern of Leavers and New Joinees
Fewer New Joinees in the current year compared with 2019, slightly improved in Q3.
8%
17%
28%
2%
5%
12%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
March to June March to September March to December
New Joinees as percentage of opening members
2019 2020
10
KAP
KAP
Pattern on Salary Movement
Significantly few members received any salary increment till H1. This gap has reduced by Q3 end.
78%
87% 87%
10%
22%
69%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
March to June March to September March to December
% of Members getting Increase in Salary
2019 2020
11
KAP
KAP
Pattern on Accumulated Leave Days
Over 80% of employees having an increase in accumulated leave balances in 2020,
up from 70% in 2019
70% 72%
78%82%
85%82%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
March to June March to September March to December
Increase in Leave Days
2019 2020
12
KAP
KAP
What’s Next Post Unlock?
Should we realign
assumptions to
long term average
rate?
Outlook of
management for
future medium
term growth rate?
Impact on Leave
provisions if
specific measures
taken in this leave
policy year.
T H E C O D E O N
S O C I A L S E C U R I T Y , 2 0 2 0
14
KAP
KAP
The Code on Social Security, 2020
The Employees' Compensation Act, 1923
The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948
The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952
The Employment Exchanges (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959
The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961
The Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972
The Cine-Workers Welfare Fund Act, 1981
The Building and Other Construction Workers’ Welfare Cess Act, 1996
The Unorganised Workers Social Security Act, 2008
The Code
on Social
Security,
2020
15
Key Changes - Chapter V “Gratuity”
KAP
KAP
Applicable
SalaryWorking
Journalist
Definition updated
from Basic + DA to
‘Wages’
No Minimum vesting
criteria
Minimum Vesting
criteria relaxed from 5
years to 3 years for
Gratuity Eligibility
Fixed Term Employment
16
“Wages” definition
KAPTotal
Remuneration
Less
Exclusions
Basic + DA
+ Retaining
plus
Excess
Exclusions
“…this includes”
Social Security
Code, Section 2(88)
The specified exclusions, however may not exceed 50 percent of all remuneration, and in the event of
exceeding, such excess amount will be added in "wages"
01 02
17
“Wages” definition - Scenarios
Pay ComponentSSC Act
ExclusionCurrent
Basic Pay (35% CTC) 420,000 420,000 420,000
HRA Y 210,000
LTA Y 75,000
Conveyance Y 120,000
PF Employer Contributions Y 50,400
Gratuity Y 20,202
NPS Contributions Y 42,000
Special allowance 262,398 262,398
Variable Bonus ? 300,000
CTC incl. Bonus 1,500,000
CTC No Bonus 1,200,000
Wages for Gratuity (p.a.) 420,000 682,398 600,000
Wages for Gratuity (p.m.) 35,000 56,867 50,000
If Bonus considered…
Wages for Gratuity (p.a.) 420,000 982,398 750,000
Wages for Gratuity (p.m.) 35,000 81,867 62,500
57% of
CTC
65% of
CTC
01 02
18
About the study
1,000+ companies in 2020
31 March data
2016-2020
19
Basic to Gross Ratios – Year on Year
Year Less than 25% From 26% to 35% From 36% to 49% From 50% to 65%
2020 3% 16% 49% 32%
2019 4% 15% 48% 33%
2018 3% 19% 48% 30%
2017 4% 18% 48% 30%
2016 2% 17% 49% 32%
Percentage of companies with the following Basic to Gross Ratios
Companies may face an increase in the deemed “wages” for benefit calculations. For e.g.
if current ratio is 40% the deemed wages would increase by 25%.
Under
Interpretation
#2
20
KAP
KAP
Basic to Gross Ratios – Industry Wise
0%3% 9% 1%
2% 2% 2%
16%
24%21%
14% 17%11% 14%
35%
43%45%
48% 45% 58%57%
48%
29%26%
36% 37%30% 28%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Agriculture Information
Technology
Infrastructure Manufacturing Others Pharmaceutical Services
Less than 25% From 26% to 35% From 36% to 49% From 50% to 65% 1000+
Companies
in 2020
Sector
Gratuity Defined
Benefit Obligation at
31.03.2020 (INR Cr)
Approx. Percentage
increase
Agriculture 148 35%
Information Technology 435 49%
Infrastructure 333 41%
Manufacturing 894 38%
Others 363 36%
Pharmaceutical 558 28%
Services 624 29%
Grand Total 3,355 36%
While calculating the above increase in Gratuity liability, we have considered change only in applicable wages and have kept other
variable such as data, actuarial assumptions, and scheme constant as per each company’s previous valuation as on 31-03-2020
21
Impact of Social Security Code on Gratuity Provisions – Macro level
1000+
Companies
in 2020
22
KAP
KAP
Impact of Social Security Code on Gratuity
Provisions – Salary Definition
• Financial Assumptions
o Discount Rate : 8.00% p.a.
o Salary Escalation : 6.00% p.a.
• Demographic Assumptions
o Mortality Rate – IALM (2006-08)
o Attrition Rate – 10.00% p.a.
Example
• Monthly Basic +DA: INR 200,000
• Monthly Wages (SSC): INR 250,000
• Age: 42 years
• Service: 15 years
Valuation Assumptions
23
KAP
KAP
Impact of Social Security Code on Gratuity
Provisions – Salary Definition
1,730,769
1,211,429
2,000,000
1,256,922
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
Discontinuance Liability Projected Benefit Obligation
AM
OU
NT
IN
IN
R
Salary and Liability with maximum ceiling
Monthly Salary: INR 200,000 Monthly Salary: INR 250,000
1,730,769
1,522,314
2,163,462
1,902,893
-
500,000
1,000,000
1,500,000
2,000,000
2,500,000
Discontinuance Liability Projected Benefit Obligation
AM
OU
NT
IN
IN
R
Salary and Liability without maximum ceiling
Monthly Salary: INR 200,000 Monthly Salary: INR 250,000
Impact – Past service cost / Actuarial Loss?
24
Impacts of Wages Definition onOther Benefits
Impact on PF and ESIC contributions may be limited
Leave encashment impact depends on
The Shops and Establishment Act in respective states
Will be pertinent to see if NPS contribution
tax allowances and salary definition may change
A c t u a r i a l V a l u a t i o n A s s u m p t i o n s
A n a l y s i s a n d I m p a c t
Discount Rate
Communication
26
Based on Expected Working Term of Obligation/ Expected Future Service
Source – FBIL (mostly used by RBI regulated entities)
‘Fixed Income Securities’ tab under ‘GSEC’
Select required date in from and to, download G-sec excel file
Go to sheet >>Par-Yield. We need to select annualized rates.
3.50%
4.00%
4.50%
5.00%
5.50%
6.00%
6.50%
7.00%
7.50%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
An
nu
ali
se
d P
ar
Yie
lds
Tenure (Years)
Annualised Par Yields on G. Secs
(www.fimmda.org with prices/yields published by FBIL)
31-03-2020 31-12-2020 31-03-2021
27
Discount Rate Trend
KAP
KAP
Salary Escalation & Attrition Rate
Communication
28
Can be based on past trend and allow for future outlook
Assumption analysis at regular intervals
Category wise?
Short term/ long term
Service Specific/ Age Specific
Attrition Rate – Analysis Results
29
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Age Cohort
Age Specific-Attrition Rate p.a.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34
Pe
rce
nta
ge
Service Cohort
Service Specific-Attrition Rate p.a.
Attrition rate lower for employees with lower service,
Attrition rate high at the younger ages.
While in Service Leave Availment Rate
Communication
30
The availment is expected leave taken in the future years out of the current accumulated balance.
Should be valued on CTC
Can be based on past trend and allow for future outlook
(Leave Availed - Leave Credited)/Opening Leave Balance
(Applicable only when availed days are greater than the current leave credited, else availment rate is 0%)
Alternative method - (Closing Leave Balance – Opening Leaves Balance)/ Opening Leaves Balance
Mortality Rate : Pre-Retirement
Communication
31
Indian Assured
Lives Mortality
2012-14 Ultimate
Indian Assured
Lives Mortality
2006-08 Ultimate
Male Insured Lives
Medically underwritten
0.000%
0.200%
0.400%
0.600%
0.800%
1.000%
1.200%
1.400%
1.600%
1.800%
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Mo
rtalit
y R
ate
(%
)
Age (Years)
Comparison of Mortality Rates over IALM 2006-08 and 2012-14
over ages 18-65
IALM 2006-08 IALM 2012-14
Mortality Rate : Post-Retirement
Communication
32
Indian Individual
Annuitant’s
Mortality Table
(2012-15)
Indian Assured
Lives Mortality
2006-08 Ultimate
• All Genders
• Effective From 1st April, 2021
• Longevity increase by 2.61
years at age 60 years
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
60 70 80 90 100 110
Mo
rtalit
y R
ate
(%
)
Age
Comparison of Mortality Rates over IALM 2006-08 and
IAMT 2012-15 over ages 60 and above
IALM 2006-08 IAMT 2012-15
Mortality Rate : Post-Retirement
Communication
33
Indian Individual
Annuitant’s
Mortality Table
(2012-15)
Indian Assured
Lives Mortality
2006-08 Ultimate
• All Genders
• Effective From 1st April, 2021
• Longevity increase by 2.61
years at age 60 years
-
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
60 70 80 90 100 110
Lo
ng
evity Y
ears
Age
Comparison of Longevity (Life Expectancy)
IALM 2006-08 and IAMT 2012-15 over ages 60 and above
IALM 2006-08 IAMT 2012-15
A c t u a r i a l V a l u a t i o n
C a l c u l a t i o n E x a m p l e
35
KAP
KAP
Actuarial Valuation Method
Obligation = Projected Benefit x Probability x Discounting
Calculated for each:▪ Type of benefit payment
▪ Projected year till retirement age
▪ Employee
36
KAP
KAP
Actuarial Valuation Calculation Example
• Financial Assumptions
o Discount Rate : 8.00% p.a.
o Salary Escalation : 6.00% p.a.
• Demographic Assumptions
o Mortality Rate – IALM (2006-08)
o Attrition Rate – 10.00% p.a.
Example
• Monthly Eligible Salary: INR 85,000
• Age: 32 years
• Service: 2 years
Valuation Assumptions
Accrued Amount = 15/26*2*85,000 capped at INR 20 Lakhs = INR 98,077
Actuarial Valuation Calculation Example
₹ 9
8,0
77
₹ 1
03
,96
2
₹ 1
10
,19
9
₹ 1
16
,81
1
₹ 1
23
,82
0
₹ 1
31
,24
9
₹ 1
39
,12
4
₹ 1
47
,47
1
₹ 1
56
,32
0
₹ 1
65
,69
9
₹ 1
75
,64
1
₹ 1
86
,17
9
₹ 1
97
,35
0
₹ 2
09
,19
1
₹ 2
21
,74
3
₹ 2
35
,04
7
₹ 2
49
,15
0
₹ 2
64
,09
9
₹ 2
79
,94
5
₹ 2
96
,74
1
₹ 3
14
,54
6
₹ 3
33
,41
9
₹ 3
53
,42
4
₹ 3
74
,62
9
₹ 3
97
,10
7
₹ 4
20
,93
3
₹ 4
46
,18
9
₹ 0
₹ 50,000
₹ 100,000
₹ 150,000
₹ 200,000
₹ 250,000
₹ 300,000
₹ 350,000
₹ 400,000
₹ 450,000
₹ 500,000
323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
AM
OU
NT
IN
IN
R
AGE
Projected Accrued Amount
₹ 1
10
₹ 1
09
₹ 1
08
₹ 8
,59
1
₹ 8
,19
0
₹ 7
,80
9
₹ 7
,44
5
₹ 7
,09
9
₹ 6
,76
9
₹ 6
,45
4
₹ 6
,15
5
₹ 5
,87
0
₹ 5
,59
8
₹ 5
,34
0
₹ 5
,09
4
₹ 4
,86
0
₹ 4
,63
6
₹ 4
,42
3
₹ 4
,21
9
₹ 4
,02
3
₹ 3
,83
5
₹ 3
,65
5
₹ 3
,48
1
₹ 3
,31
3
₹ 3
,15
2
₹ 2
,99
7
₹ 2
5,9
11
₹ 0
₹ 5,000
₹ 10,000
₹ 15,000
₹ 20,000
₹ 25,000
₹ 30,000
32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
AM
OU
NT
IN
IN
RAGE
Expected Payout
Projected Benefit
Obligation
INR 58,727
37
Impact of Change in Vesting Criteria
₹ 1
10
₹ 1
09
₹ 1
08
₹ 8
,59
1₹
8,1
90
₹ 7
,80
9₹
7,4
45
₹ 7
,09
9₹
6,7
69
₹ 6
,45
4₹
6,1
55
₹ 5
,87
0₹
5,5
98
₹ 5
,34
0₹
5,0
94
₹ 4
,86
0₹
4,6
36
₹ 4
,42
3₹
4,2
19
₹ 4
,02
3₹
3,8
35
₹ 3
,65
5₹
3,4
81
₹ 3
,31
3₹
3,1
52
₹ 2
,99
7₹
25
,91
1
₹ 0
₹ 5,000
₹ 10,000
₹ 15,000
₹ 20,000
₹ 25,000
₹ 30,000
323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
AM
OU
NT
IN
IN
R
AGE
Expected Payout with vesting criteria as 5 years
Projected Benefit Obligation INR 58,727 Projected Benefit Obligation INR 75,013
Expected cashflow for – Fixed term contract employees - ?
₹1
10
₹
9,4
54
₹
9,0
12
₹
8,5
91
₹
8,1
90
₹
7,8
09
₹
7,4
45
₹
7,0
99
₹
6,7
69
₹
6,4
54
₹
6,1
55
₹
5,8
70
₹
5,5
98
₹
5,3
40
₹
5,0
94
₹
4,8
60
₹
4,6
36
₹
4,4
23
₹
4,2
19
₹
4,0
23
₹
3,8
35
₹
3,6
55
₹
3,4
81
₹
3,3
13
₹
3,1
52
₹
2,9
97
₹
25
,91
1
₹0
₹5,000
₹10,000
₹15,000
₹20,000
₹25,000
₹30,000
323334353637383940414243444546474849505152535455565758
AM
OU
NT
IN
IN
R
AGE
Expected Payout with vesting criteria as 3 years
38
P r a c t i c a l a s p e c t s i n
A c t u a r i a l V a l u a t i o n
40
Practical aspects in Actuarial Valuation
KAP
KAP
KAP.
Directors Included?
Ind AS 24 Disclosure?
Benefit Scheme as per
policy and Actuary
Report
Contribution to
Gratuity Fund, Tax
Rule 103
Limit of Leave
Availment and
Encashment
Employee Transfer
within Group
Pension Valuation for
Regional Rural Banks
41
Common Errors Found by FRRB in
Implementation of AS 15 Employees Benefits
KAP
KAP
Source: The Chartered Accountant Journal April 2019
Non-provisioning of Gratuity (Matching Principle)
Inadequate disclosure in policy pertaining to liability for superannuation fund (Para 45)
No disclosure or inadequate disclosures pertaining to para 120
Defined Benefit Plan wrongly treated as Defined Contribution Plan
Non-Disclosure of para 47 (expense for Defined Contribution Plan)
Inadequate disclosure pertaining to para 65 (Use of PUCM Method)
O P E N F O R U M D I S C U S S I O N
43
Food for thought - Open Discussion
Wages definition - Statutory Bonus v/s Variable Bonus ?
PF Interest – On Opening Accumulated Balance or Current year contribution interest only ?
Impact of change in Gratuity Wage definition under Social Security code (Past Service Cost/ Other Comprehensive Income) ?
Companies likely to restructure CTC?
Discount Rate as Single G-Sec or Term Structure of G-Sec?
A N Y Q U E S T I O N S ?
• Actuarial valuations under
Indian and Global Accounting
Standards
• Financial projections for
management and funding
purposes
• Cashflow projections for
asset-liability assessments
• Trend and experience
analyses for appropriateness
of assumptions
Financial
Insights
Design and
Structure
Governance and
Administration
Our Solutions for Employee Benefits
• Advise on Retirement Trusts
set up and ongoing operations
• Regulatory advice
• Trust Documentation drafting
and approvals
• Trust accounting and
secretarial support
• Project management of Trust
operations
• Funding vendor selection
• Trustee Training workshops
• Design new employee
benefits
• Review existing designs to
optimize
• Assess cost implications of
proposed changes
• Draft handbooks / rules
• Presentation to
employees
Communication
45
We work for you, wherever your business takes you!
Thank You!
46
47
This material and the information contained herein prepared by M/S. K. A. Pandit Consultants & Actuaries (KAP) is intended to provide general
information on a particular subject or subjects and is not an exhaustive treatment of such subject(s). This material contains information sourced from third
party sites (external sites). KAP is not responsible for any loss whatsoever caused due to reliance placed on information sourced from such external sites.
By means of this material, KAP is not rendering professional advice or services. This information is not intended to be relied upon as the sole basis for
any decision which may affect you or your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that might affect your personal finances or
business, you should consult a qualified professional adviser. No entity in the KAP Network shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any
person who relies on this material. ©2020 K. A. PANDIT ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED | ISO 27001:2013 CERTIFIED.
Disclaimer