40
265 Acquisitions and Projects Aswath Damodaran 265 ¨ An acquisition is an investment/project like any other and all of the rules that apply to traditional investments should apply to acquisitions as well. In other words, for an acquisition to make sense: ¤ It should have positive NPV. The present value of the expected cash flows from the acquisition should exceed the price paid on the acquisition. ¤ The IRR of the cash flows to the firm (equity) from the acquisition > Cost of capital (equity) on the acquisition ¨ In estimating the cash flows on the acquisition, we should count in any possible cash flows from synergy. ¨ The discount rate to assess the present value should be based upon the risk of the investment (target company) and not the entity considering the investment (acquiring company).

Acquisitions and Projects - New York University Stern ...pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/podcasts/cfspr17/session14.pdf · Acquisitions and Projects Aswath Damodaran 265 ... ¤It should

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

265

AcquisitionsandProjects

AswathDamodaran

265

¨ Anacquisitionisaninvestment/projectlikeanyotherandalloftherulesthatapplytotraditionalinvestmentsshouldapplytoacquisitionsaswell.Inotherwords,foranacquisitiontomakesense:¤ ItshouldhavepositiveNPV.Thepresentvalueoftheexpectedcash

flowsfromtheacquisitionshouldexceedthepricepaidontheacquisition.

¤ TheIRRofthecashflowstothefirm(equity)fromtheacquisition>Costofcapital(equity)ontheacquisition

¨ Inestimatingthecashflowsontheacquisition,weshouldcountinanypossiblecashflowsfromsynergy.

¨ Thediscountratetoassessthepresentvalueshouldbebasedupontheriskoftheinvestment(targetcompany)andnottheentityconsideringtheinvestment(acquiringcompany).

266

TataMotorsandHarmanInternational

AswathDamodaran

266

¨ HarmanInternationalisapubliclytradedUSfirmthatmanufactureshighendaudioequipment.TataMotorsisanautomobilecompany,basedinIndia.

¨ TataMotorsisconsideringanacquisitionofHarman,withaneyeonusingitsaudioequipmentinitsIndianautomobiles,asoptionalupgradesonnewcars.

267

EstimatingtheCostofCapitalfortheAcquisition(nosynergy)

AswathDamodaran

267

1. Currency:EstimatedinUS$,sincecashflowswillbeestimatedinUS$.2. Beta:HarmanInternationalisanelectroniccompanyandweusetheunleveredbeta

(1.17)ofelectronicscompaniesintheUS.3. EquityRiskPremium:ComputedbasedonHarman’soperatingexposure:

4. Debtratio&costofdebt:TataMotorsplanstoassumetheexistingdebtofHarmanInternationalandtopreserveHarman’sexistingdebtratio.Harmancurrentlyhasadebt(includingleasecommitments)tocapitalratioof7.39%(translatingintoadebttoequityratioof7.98%)andfacesapre-taxcostofdebtof4.75%(basedonitsBBB- rating).

LeveredBeta=1.17(1+(1-.40)(.0798))=1.226CostofEquity=2.75%+1.226(6.13%)=10.26%

CostofCapital=10.26%(1-.0739)+4.75%(1-.40)(.0739)=9.67%

268

EstimatingCashflows- FirstSteps

AswathDamodaran

268

¨ OperatingIncome:Thefirmreportedoperatingincomeof$201.25milliononrevenuesof$4.30billionfortheyear.Addingbacknon-recurringexpenses(restructuringchargeof$83.2millionin2013)andadjustingincomefortheconversionofoperatingleasecommitmentstodebt,weestimatedanadjustedoperatingincomeof$313.2million.Thefirmpaid18.21%ofitsincomeastaxesin2013andwewillusethisastheeffectivetaxrateforthecashflows.

¨ Reinvestment:Depreciationin2013amountedto$128.2million,whereascapitalexpendituresandacquisitionsfortheyearwere$206.4million.Non-cashworkingcapitalincreasedby$272.6millionduring2013butwas13.54%ofrevenuesin2013.

269

Bringingingrowth

¨ WewillassumethatHarmanInternationalisamaturefirm,growing2.75%inperpetuity.

¨ Weassumethatrevenues,operatingincome,capitalexpendituresanddepreciationwillallgrow2.75%fortheyearandthatthenon-cashworkingcapitalremain13.54%ofrevenuesinfutureperiods.

AswathDamodaran

269

270

ValueofHarmanInternational:BeforeSynergy

AswathDamodaran

270

¨ Earlier,weestimatedthecostofcapitalof9.67%astherightdiscountratetoapplyinvaluingHarmanInternationalandthecashflowtothefirmof$166.85millionfor2014(nextyear),assuminga2.75%growthrateinrevenues,operatingincome,depreciation,capitalexpendituresandtotalnon-cashworkingcapital.Wealsoassumedthatthesecashflowswouldcontinuetogrow2.75%ayearinperpetuity.

¨ Addingthecashbalanceofthefirm($515million)andsubtractingouttheexistingdebt($313million,includingthedebtvalueofleases)yieldsthevalueofequityinthefirm:

¨ ValueofEquity =ValueofOperatingAssets+Cash– Debt

=$2,476+$515- $313million=$2,678million

¨ ThemarketvalueofequityinHarmaninNovember2013was$5,428million.

¨ TotheextentthatTataMotorspaysthemarketprice,itwillhavetogeneratebenefitsfromsynergythatexceed$2750million.

MeasuringInvestmentReturnsII.InvestmentInteractions,OptionsandRemorse…

Lifeistooshortforregrets,right?

AswathDamodaran 271

272

Independentinvestmentsaretheexception…

AswathDamodaran

272

¨ Inalloftheexampleswehaveusedsofar,theinvestmentsthatwehaveanalyzedhavestoodalone.Thus,ourjobwasasimpleone.Assesstheexpectedcashflowsontheinvestmentanddiscountthemattherightdiscountrate.

¨ Intherealworld,mostinvestmentsarenotindependent.Takinganinvestmentcanoftenmeanrejectinganotherinvestmentatoneextreme(mutuallyexclusive)tobeinglockedintotakeaninvestmentinthefuture(pre-requisite).

¨ Moregenerally,acceptinganinvestmentcancreatesidecostsforafirm’sexistinginvestmentsinsomecasesandbenefitsforothers.

273

I.MutuallyExclusiveInvestments

AswathDamodaran

273

¨ Wehavelookedathowbesttoassessastand-aloneinvestmentandconcludedthatagoodinvestmentwillhavepositiveNPVandgenerateaccountingreturns(ROCandROE)andIRRthatexceedyourcosts(capitalandequity).

¨ Insomecases,though,firmsmayhavetochoosebetweeninvestmentsbecause¤ Theyaremutuallyexclusive:Takingoneinvestmentmakestheother

oneredundantbecausetheybothservethesamepurpose¤ Thefirmhaslimitedcapitalandcannottakeeverygoodinvestment

(i.e.,investmentswithpositiveNPVorhighIRR).¨ Usingthetwostandarddiscountedcashflowmeasures,NPV

andIRR,canyielddifferentchoiceswhenchoosingbetweeninvestments.

274

ComparingProjectswiththesame(orsimilar)lives..

AswathDamodaran

274

¨ Whencomparingandchoosingbetweeninvestmentswiththesamelives,wecan¤ Computetheaccountingreturns(ROC,ROE)oftheinvestmentsandpicktheonewiththehigherreturns

¤ ComputetheNPVoftheinvestmentsandpicktheonewiththehigherNPV

¤ ComputetheIRRoftheinvestmentsandpicktheonewiththehigherIRR

¨ Whileitiseasytoseewhyaccountingreturnmeasurescangivedifferentrankings(andchoices)thanthediscountedcashflowapproaches,youwouldexpectNPVandIRRtoyieldconsistentresultssincetheyarebothtime-weighted,incrementalcashflowreturnmeasures.

275

Case1:IRRversusNPV

AswathDamodaran

275

¨ Considertwoprojectswiththefollowingcashflows:Year Project1CF Project2CF0 -1000 -10001 800 2002 1000 3003 1300 4004 -2200 500

276

Project’sNPVProfile

AswathDamodaran

276

277

Whatdowedonow?

AswathDamodaran

277

¨ Project1hastwointernalratesofreturn.Thefirstis6.60%,whereasthesecondis36.55%.Project2hasoneinternalrateofreturn,about12.8%.

¨ Whyaretheretwointernalratesofreturnonproject1?

¨ Ifyourcostofcapitalis12%,whichinvestmentwouldyouaccept?a. Project1b. Project2

¨ Explain.

278

Case2:NPVversusIRR

AswathDamodaran

278

Cash Flow

Investment

$ 350,000

$ 1,000,000

Project A

Cash Flow

Investment

Project B

NPV = $467,937IRR= 33.66%

$ 450,000 $ 600,000 $ 750,000

NPV = $1,358,664IRR=20.88%

$ 10,000,000

$ 3,000,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 5,500,000

279

Whichonewouldyoupick?

AswathDamodaran

279

¨ Assumethatyoucanpickonlyoneofthesetwoprojects.YourchoicewillclearlyvarydependinguponwhetheryoulookatNPVorIRR.Youhaveenoughmoneycurrentlyonhandtotakeeither.Whichonewouldyoupick?a. ProjectA.Itgivesmethebiggerbangforthebuckandmore

marginforerror.b. ProjectB.Itcreatesmoredollarvalueinmybusiness.

¨ IfyoupickA,whatwouldyourbiggestconcernbe?

¨ IfyoupickB,whatwouldyourbiggestconcernbe?

280

CapitalRationing,UncertaintyandChoosingaRule

AswathDamodaran

280

¨ Ifabusinesshaslimitedaccesstocapital,hasastreamofsurplusvalueprojectsandfacesmoreuncertaintyinitsprojectcashflows,itismuchmorelikelytouseIRRasitsdecisionrule.¤ Small,high-growthcompaniesandprivatebusinessesaremuchmorelikelytouseIRR.

¨ Ifabusinesshassubstantialfundsonhand,accesstocapital,limitedsurplusvalueprojects,andmorecertaintyonitsprojectcashflows,itismuchmorelikelytouseNPVasitsdecisionrule.

¨ Asfirmsgopublicandgrow,theyaremuchmorelikelytogainfromusingNPV.

281

Thesourcesofcapitalrationing…

AswathDamodaran

281

Cause Number of firms Percent of total Debt limit imposed by outside agreement 10 10.7 Debt limit placed by management external to firm

3 3.2

Limit placed on borrowing by internal management

65 69.1

Restrictive policy imposed on retained earnings

2 2.1

Maintenance of target EPS or PE ratio 14 14.9

282

AnAlternativetoIRRwithCapitalRationing

AswathDamodaran

282

¨ TheproblemwiththeNPVrule,whenthereiscapitalrationing,isthatitisadollarvalue.Itmeasuressuccessinabsoluteterms.

¨ TheNPVcanbeconvertedintoarelativemeasurebydividingbytheinitialinvestment.Thisiscalledtheprofitabilityindex.¤ ProfitabilityIndex(PI)=NPV/InitialInvestment

¨ Intheexampledescribed,thePIofthetwoprojectswouldhavebeen:¤ PIofProjectA=$467,937/1,000,000=46.79%¤ PIofProjectB=$1,358,664/10,000,000=13.59%¤ ProjectAwouldhavescoredhigher.

283

Case3:NPVversusIRR

AswathDamodaran

283

Cash Flow

Investment

$ 5,000,000

$ 10,000,000

Project A

Cash Flow

Investment

Project B

NPV = $1,191,712IRR=21.41%

$ 4,000,000 $ 3,200,000 $ 3,000,000

NPV = $1,358,664IRR=20.88%

$ 10,000,000

$ 3,000,000 $ 3,500,000 $ 4,500,000 $ 5,500,000

284

Whythedifference?

AswathDamodaran

284

¨ Theseprojectsareofthesamescale.BoththeNPVandIRRusetime-weightedcashflows.Yet,therankingsaredifferent.Why?

¨ Whichonewouldyoupick?a. ProjectA.Itgivesmethebiggerbangforthebuckand

moremarginforerror.b. ProjectB.Itcreatesmoredollarvalueinmybusiness.

285

NPV,IRRandtheReinvestmentRateAssumption

AswathDamodaran

285

¨ TheNPVruleassumesthatintermediatecashflowsontheprojectgetreinvestedatthehurdlerate(whichisbaseduponwhatprojectsofcomparableriskshouldearn).

¨ TheIRRruleassumesthatintermediatecashflowsontheprojectgetreinvestedattheIRR.ImplicitistheassumptionthatthefirmhasaninfinitestreamofprojectsyieldingsimilarIRRs.

¨ Conclusion:WhentheIRRishigh(theprojectiscreatingsignificantsurplusvalue)andtheprojectlifeislong,theIRRwilloverstatethetruereturnontheproject.

286

SolutiontoReinvestmentRateProblem

AswathDamodaran

286

287

WhyNPVandIRRmaydiffer..Evenifprojectshavethesamelives

AswathDamodaran

287

¨ AprojectcanhaveonlyoneNPV,whereasitcanhavemorethanoneIRR.

¨ TheNPVisadollarsurplusvalue,whereastheIRRisapercentagemeasureofreturn.TheNPVisthereforelikelytobelargerfor“largescale” projects,whiletheIRRishigherfor“small-scale” projects.

¨ TheNPVassumesthatintermediatecashflowsgetreinvestedatthe“hurdlerate”,whichisbaseduponwhatyoucanmakeoninvestmentsofcomparablerisk,whiletheIRRassumesthatintermediatecashflowsgetreinvestedatthe“IRR”.

288

Comparingprojectswithdifferentlives..

AswathDamodaran

288Project A

-$1500

$350 $350 $350 $350$350

-$1000

$400 $400 $400 $400$400

$350 $350 $350 $350$350

Project B

NPV of Project A = $ 442IRR of Project A = 28.7%

NPV of Project B = $ 478IRR for Project B = 19.4%

Hurdle Rate for Both Projects = 12%

289

WhyNPVscannotbecompared..Whenprojectshavedifferentlives.

AswathDamodaran

289

¨ Thenetpresentvaluesofmutuallyexclusiveprojectswithdifferentlivescannotbecompared,sincethereisabiastowardslonger-lifeprojects.TocomparetheNPV,wehaveto¤ replicatetheprojectstilltheyhavethesamelife(or)¤ convertthenetpresentvaluesintoannuities

¨ TheIRRisunaffectedbyprojectlife.WecanchoosetheprojectwiththehigherIRR.

290

Solution1:ProjectReplication

AswathDamodaran

290

Project A: Replicated

-$1500

$350 $350 $350 $350$350 $350 $350 $350 $350$350

Project B

-$1000

$400 $400 $400 $400$400 $400 $400 $400 $400$400

-$1000 (Replication)

NPV of Project A replicated = $ 693

NPV of Project B= $ 478

291

Solution2:EquivalentAnnuities

AswathDamodaran

291

¨ EquivalentAnnuityfor5-yearproject¤ =$442*PV(A,12%,5years)¤ =$122.62

¨ EquivalentAnnuityfor10-yearproject¤ =$478*PV(A,12%,10years)¤ =$84.60

292

Whatwouldyouchooseasyourinvestmenttool?

AswathDamodaran

292

¨ Giventheadvantages/disadvantagesoutlinedforeachofthedifferentdecisionrules,whichonewouldyouchoosetoadopt?a. ReturnonInvestment(ROE,ROC)b. PaybackorDiscountedPaybackc. NetPresentValued. InternalRateofReturne. ProfitabilityIndex

¨ Doyouthinkyourchoicehasbeenaffectedbytheeventsofthelastquarterof2008?Ifso,why?Ifnot,whynot?

293

Whatfirmsactuallyuse..

AswathDamodaran

293

DecisionRule %ofFirmsusingasprimarydecisionrulein1976 1986 1998

IRR 53.6% 49.0% 42.0%AccountingReturn 25.0% 8.0% 7.0%NPV 9.8% 21.0% 34.0%PaybackPeriod 8.9% 19.0% 14.0%ProfitabilityIndex 2.7% 3.0% 3.0%

294

II.SideCostsandBenefits

AswathDamodaran

294

¨ Mostprojectsconsideredbyanybusinesscreatesidecostsandbenefitsforthatbusiness.¤ Thesidecostsincludethecostscreatedbytheuseofresourcesthatthebusinessalreadyowns(opportunitycosts)andlostrevenuesforotherprojectsthatthefirmmayhave.

¤ Thebenefitsthatmaynotbecapturedinthetraditionalcapitalbudgetinganalysisincludeprojectsynergies(wherecashflowbenefitsmayaccruetootherprojects)andoptionsembeddedinprojects(includingtheoptionstodelay,expandorabandonaproject).

¨ Thereturnsonaprojectshouldincorporatethesecostsandbenefits.

295

A.OpportunityCost

AswathDamodaran

295

¨ Anopportunitycostariseswhenaprojectusesaresourcethatmayalreadyhavebeenpaidforbythefirm.

¨ Whenaresourcethatisalreadyownedbyafirmisbeingconsideredforuseinaproject,thisresourcehastobepricedonitsnextbestalternativeuse,whichmaybe¤ asaleoftheasset,inwhichcasetheopportunitycostistheexpectedproceedsfromthesale,netofanycapitalgainstaxes

¤ rentingorleasingtheassetout,inwhichcasetheopportunitycostistheexpectedpresentvalueoftheafter-taxrentalorleaserevenues.

¤ useelsewhereinthebusiness,inwhichcasetheopportunitycostisthecostofreplacingit.

296

Case1:ForegoneSale?

AswathDamodaran

296

¨ AssumethatDisneyownslandinRioalready.Thislandisundevelopedandwasacquiredseveralyearsagofor$5millionforahotelthatwasneverbuilt.Itisanticipated,ifthisthemeparkisbuilt,thatthislandwillbeusedtobuildtheofficesforDisneyRio.Thelandcurrentlycanbesoldfor$40million,thoughthatwouldcreateacapitalgain(whichwillbetaxedat20%).Inassessingthethemepark,whichofthefollowingwouldyoudo:¤ Ignorethecostoftheland,sinceDisneyownsitsalready¤ Usethebookvalueoftheland,whichis$5million¤ Usethemarketvalueoftheland,whichis$40million¤ Other:

297

Case2:IncrementalCost?AnOnlineRetailingVentureforBookscape

AswathDamodaran

297

¨ Theinitialinvestmentneededtostarttheservice,includingtheinstallationofadditionalphonelinesandcomputerequipment,willbe$1million.Theseinvestmentsareexpectedtohavealifeoffouryears,atwhichpointtheywillhavenosalvagevalue.Theinvestmentswillbedepreciatedstraightlineoverthefour-yearlife.

¨ Therevenuesinthefirstyearareexpectedtobe$1.5million,growing20%inyeartwo,and10%inthetwoyearsfollowing.Thecostofthebookswillbe60%oftherevenuesineachofthefouryears.

¨ Thesalariesandotherbenefitsfortheemployeesareestimatedtobe$150,000inyearone,andgrow10%ayearforthefollowingthreeyears.

¨ Theworkingcapital,whichincludestheinventoryofbooksneededfortheserviceandtheaccountsreceivablewillbe10%oftherevenues;theinvestmentsinworkingcapitalhavetobemadeatthebeginningofeachyear.Attheendofyear4,theentireworkingcapitalisassumedtobesalvaged.

¨ Thetaxrateonincomeisexpectedtobe40%.

298

Costofcapitalforinvestment

AswathDamodaran

298

¨ Wewillre-estimatethebetaforthisonlineprojectbylookingatpubliclytradedonlineretailers.Theunleveredtotalbetaofonlineretailersis3.02,andweassumethatthisprojectwillbefundedwiththesamemixofdebtandequity(D/E=21.41%,Debt/Capital=17.63%)thatBookscapeusesintherestofthebusiness.WewillassumethatBookscape’staxrate(40%)andpretaxcostofdebt(4.05%)applytothisproject.LeveredBetaOnlineService =3.02[1+(1– 0.4)(0.2141)]=3.41CostofEquityOnlineService =2.75%+3.41(5.5%)=21.48%CostofCapitalOnlineService=21.48%(0.8237)+4.05%(1– 0.4)(0.1763)=18.12%

¨ Thisismuchhigherthanthecostofcapital(10.30%)wecomputedforBookscapeearlier,butitreflectsthehigherriskoftheonlineretailventure.

299

IncrementalCashflowsonInvestment

AswathDamodaran

299

NPV of investment = $76,375

0 1 2 3 4Revenues $1,500,000 $1,800,000 $1,980,000 $2,178,000

Operating ExpensesLabor $150,000 $165,000 $181,500 $199,650Materials $900,000 $1,080,000 $1,188,000 $1,306,800Depreciation $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000

Operating Income $200,000 $305,000 $360,500 $421,550Taxes $80,000 $122,000 $144,200 $168,620After-tax Operating Income $120,000 $183,000 $216,300 $252,930+ Depreciation $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000- Change in Working

Capital $150,000 $30,000 $18,000 $19,800 -$217,800+ Salvage Value of

Investment $0Cash flow after taxes -$1,150,000 $340,000 $415,000 $446,500 $720,730Present Value -$1,150,000 $287,836 $297,428 $270,908 $370,203

300

Thesidecosts…

AswathDamodaran

300

¨ Itisestimatedthattheadditionalbusinessassociatedwithonlineorderingandtheadministrationoftheserviceitselfwilladdtotheworkloadforthecurrentgeneralmanagerofthebookstore.Asaconsequence,thesalaryofthegeneralmanagerwillbeincreasedfrom$100,000to$120,000nextyear;itisexpectedtogrow5percentayearafterthatfortheremainingthreeyearsoftheonlineventure.Aftertheonlineventureisendedinthefourthyear,themanager’ssalarywillrevertbacktoitsoldlevels.

¨ ItisalsoestimatedthatBookscapeOnlinewillutilizeanofficethatiscurrentlyusedtostorefinancialrecords.Therecordswillbemovedtoabankvault,whichwillcost$1000ayeartorent.

301

NPVwithsidecosts…

AswathDamodaran

301

¨ Additionalsalarycosts=PVof$34,352

¨ OfficeCosts¤ After-TaxAdditionalStorageExpenditureperYear=$1,000(1– 0.40)=$600¤ PVofexpenditures=$600(PVofannuity,18.12%,4yrs)=$1,610

¨ NPVwithOpportunityCosts=$76,375– $34,352– $1,610=$40,413¨ Opportunitycostsaggregatedintocashflows

Year Cashflows Opportunity costs Cashflow with opportunity costs Present Value0 ($1,150,000) ($1,150,000) ($1,150,000)1 $340,000 $12,600 $327,400 $277,170 2 $415,000 $13,200 $401,800 $287,968 3 $446,500 $13,830 $432,670 $262,517 4 $720,730 $14,492 $706,238 $362,759 Adjusted NPV $40,413

302

Case3:ExcessCapacity

AswathDamodaran

302

¨ IntheValeexample,assumethatthefirmwilluseitsexistingdistributionsystemtoservicetheproductionoutofthenewironoremine.Theminemanagerarguesthatthereisnocostassociatedwithusingthissystem,sinceithasbeenpaidforalreadyandcannotbesoldorleasedtoacompetitor(andthushasnocompetingcurrentuse).Doyouagree?a. Yesb. No

303

AFrameworkforAssessingTheCostofUsingExcessCapacity

AswathDamodaran

303

¨ IfIdonotaddthenewproduct,whenwillIrunoutofcapacity?

¨ IfIaddthenewproduct,whenwillIrunoutofcapacity?

¨ WhenIrunoutofcapacity,whatwillIdo?¤ Cutbackonproduction:costisPVofafter-taxcashflowsfromlostsales

¤ Buynewcapacity:costisdifferenceinPVbetweenearlier&laterinvestment

304

ProductandProjectCannibalization:ARealCost?

AswathDamodaran

304

¨ AssumethatintheDisneythemeparkexample,20%oftherevenuesattheRioDisneyparkareexpectedtocomefrompeoplewhowouldhavegonetoDisneythemeparksintheUS.Indoingtheanalysisofthepark,youwoulda. Lookatonlyincrementalrevenues(i.e.80%ofthetotalrevenue)b. Lookattotalrevenuesattheparkc. Chooseanintermediatenumber

¨ WouldyouranswerbedifferentifyouwereanalyzingwhethertointroduceanewshowontheDisneycablechannelonSaturdaymorningsthatisexpectedtoattract20%ofitsviewersfromABC(whichisalsoownedbyDisney)?a. Yesb. No