View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Acoustic-Articulatory Interpretations of Professional Imitations of “hallå”
in three Swedish Dialects
Frantz Clermont & Elisabeth ZetterholmDepartment of Linguistics & Phonetics
Centre for Languages & LiteratureLund University, SWEDEN
2006 IAFPA Conference Gothenburg University, Sweden
25th July 2006
2
A Forensic Scenario: Hypothetical but Not Implausible
Managing Director of the Bank of Sweden
receives 5 threatening calls on the same day
A male voice perceived for all 5 calls
A different dialect perceived on each call
Every call followed a similar pattern: the caller(s) started by saying “hallå”
politely with situational variations
the caller(s) proceeded with threats
expressed in harsh language
The EVIDENCE FORENSICALLY-ORIENTED QUESTIONS
1a) What dialectal markers are detectable
in “hallå” spoken by a given imitator?
1b) Are the markers consistent
from situation to situation?
2a) Are there cues of an imitator’s
in dialectal imitations?
2b) Do such cues persist
from situation to situation?
Clermont, F. & Zetterholm, E. (2006), “F-pattern Analysis of Professional Imitations of “hallå”
in three Swedish dialects”, Proc. XIXth Swedish Phonetics Conf., 7-9 June 2006, Lund.
THIS SEQUEL STUDY:
ACOUSTIC-ARTICULATORY INSIGHTS
OBSERVATION from F-patterns:“LANDMARKS of RESISTANCE”
in NEIGHBOURHOOD of /l/ in “hallå”
3
(1) To detect dialectal markers in “hallå” 1 situation (telephone-answering)
1 professional imitator
3 of the 5 dialects recorded
(2) To look for cues of the imitator’s voice
in the 3 dialectal imitations
Data Particulars & Research Objectives
meeting along-lost friend
SITUATIONS
answering the telephone
signallingarrival at home
“hallå, det är Anders”
“hallå, nu är jag hemma”
“hallå, det var längesen”
NorrlandIMITATOR
DIALECTAL IMITATIONS
Stockholm Gothenburg Skåne Småland
STKSLF GTB SKN SLD NLD
øø ø ø ø ø
6 6
7 7
6
6 6
6 6
6 6 6 5
7 7
6 6 6 7 5 5
5 56 6
Listening Test Results on Impressionistic Scale
[v. poor = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 = v. good]
ACOUSTIC-ARTICULATORY
APPROACH
4
Phonetic
Segmentation
Time
Normalisation
F-pattern
Estimation
POLE-GRAMS
‘a’ ‘l’ ‘å:’
‘a’ ‘l’ ‘å:’
Acoustic-Articulatory Methods: (1) Segmentation, F-pattern
?
The Problem!
5
Acoustic-Articulatory Methods: (2) Time Normalisation[Approach guided by relative durations of ‘a’, ‘l’, ‘å’]
/l/-segment - a suitable reference segment Rule of thumb:
L(/a/) ≈ 3 times L(/l/)
L(/å:/) ≈ 5 times L(/l/) 5 landmarks for /l/ 15 for /a/ & 25 for /å:/
a total of 45 landmarks Values @landmarks via spline interpolation
‘a’ ‘l’ ‘å:’
Inter-token spread (Hz) averaged over the 45 landmarks
F1 F2 F3 F4
mean (+SLF)Mean (−SLF)
24 24
4442
47 31
49 48
6
Acoustic-Articulatory Methods: (3a) SM67-Model
SM67-Model Formant frequencies Anti-symmetric component of = odd-numbered terms of a Fourier cosine series = even-numbered terms not easily obtained from
acoustics
Anti-Symmetry A limitation vis-à-vis symmetrically-shaped sounds An advantage vis-à-vis shape uniqueness
EXTANT PROBLEMS How unique is the SM67’s Area Function? How to set a realistic value for L?
10 A0nnn FFF
L
cnFn 4
120
SM67: [Schroeder (1967); Mermelstein (1967)]
{F1, F2, F3, …}
L
dx xAln
xAln12 na
na2
Sound Speed
Acoustic-Articulatory Methods: (3b) SM67-Model extended
SynthesiseCalculate12 na xAln
Calculate
Cosine Coefficients xATARGETF-Pattern
CANDIDATEF-Pattern
iterate untilerror ≤ 0.001
adjust 12 na
SM67SM67 LF75
Calculate ECCENTRICITYfrom uniformity
adjust L = L ± dL Lmin = L0−3cm Lmax = L0+3cm dL = 0.5cm
i
2i
i
i
1)(2iF
1)(2iF
4
cL0
PZ70
012 2
n
nn F
Fa
Parseval’s Theorem
212 )a( n
n
7
‘a’
‘l’
‘å’
Acoustic-Articulatory Representation of “hallå”:
Examples of Key Parameters
landmark 7
landmark 18
landmark 30
Eccentricity from Uniformity
over a range of candidate VT-Lengths
Cross-Sectional Area Function (@min. eccentricity)
optimised to match target F-patterns
8
Vocal-Tract Shapes (area functions) & Lengths
SELF
GBG STK SKN
DIALECTAL landmarks
Potential Landmarks
of RESISTANCE
SELF
9
Vocal-Tract Shapes & Eccentricity from Uniformity
SELF
GBG STK SKN
Quasi-Neutral
Landmarks
DIALECTAL landmarks
10
Vocal-Tract Shapes & /l/-related CoarticulationRMS distances between
Area-Functions of ‘l’ (onset-landmark) and ‘Area-Functions of a’ (15 landmarks)
RMS distances between
Area-Functions of ‘l’ (offset-landmark) and Area-Functions of ‘å’ (25 landmarks)
Coarticulation-Resistance
Landmarks
11
Concluding Summary
Motivated present endeavour by way of a forensic “hypothetical”
Outlined current project on dialectal imitations of “hallå”
Discussed time-normalisation problem & demonstrated approach
Provided acoustic-articulatory evidence for potential “landmarks of resistance” to a complete disguise of “hallå”, namely:
(1) Consistent quasi-uniformity of vocal-tract shapes through the landmarks of /l/
(2) Short sequence of landmarks of coarticulation resistance fro and to /l/
12
Ways Forward IN THE NEAR-TO-MEDIUM TERM:
1) To proceed with the other situational varieties of “hallå” 2) To strengthen the viability of the approaches presented here
IN THE LONG TERM: 1) To acquire further data from the same imitator2) To acquire “hallå” data from native speakers of Swedish dialects3) To enrol more imitators – both professional & naïve