Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This is a repository copy of Achieving Biocompatible SABRE : An in vitro Cytotoxicity Study.
White Rose Research Online URL for this paper:http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/125215/
Version: Accepted Version
Article:
Manoharan, Anand, Rayner, Peter J. orcid.org/0000-0002-6577-4117, Iali, Wissam orcid.org/0000-0002-9428-2023 et al. (3 more authors) (2017) Achieving Biocompatible SABRE : An in vitro Cytotoxicity Study. CHEMMEDCHEM. ISSN 1860-7179
https://doi.org/10.1002/cmdc.201700725
[email protected]://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/
Reuse
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/
Takedown
If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request.
FU
A
A
B
[a]
[b]
Ab
Si
th
Es
ap
SABR
SABR
m
we
de
bip
in
In
Cl
dise
an
an
al
in
re
di
Po
ne
tu
no
pa
dist
Th
Ex
FULL PAP
Achievin
Anand Manoh
B. Duckett*[a
] Dr. A. Manoh
Department o
University of
Heslington
York
YO10 5DD (U
E-mail: simon
] Prof. V. H. Pe
School of Bio
University of
Southampton
Supporting in
bstract: Produ
Signal Amplificati
the door to simple
Essential to
pplications is th
SABRE reaction
SABRE approach
main cause of ob
e develop tw
eactivation and
phasic catalysis
vivo study.
Introduction
linical Magnetic
isease diagnosi
nd field gradie
natomy. Howeve
ll clinical applica
n the body. Hyp
esponses into
iagnostic tech
Polarization (DN
ecessary to tra
umors[1] whilst
oble gases has
An alternative
arahydrogen (p
istribution witho
This technique i
Exchange (SAB
Figure 1: Sch
PER
ng bioco
oharan,[a] Petea]
haran, Dr. P. J. Ra
of Chemistry
York
(UK)
Perry
ological Sciences
Southampton
n (UK)
nformation (SI) for
uction of a bioc
ion By Reversi
e clinical diagno
successful pr
he determinatio
mixture. Here
h using in vitro
bserved toxicity
wo catalyst r
d ion-exchange
s. These routes
n
c Resonance I
sis. It utilizes st
ients to give
ver, due to MR
cations detect w
perpolarization
strong signals
chniques. For
NP) has been u
ack the in vivo m
Spin Exchan
s allowed the di
ve low cost app
p-H2) to creat
out changing o
is known as S
SABRE) and is sho
Schematic repre
ompatib
eter J. Rayne
ayner, Dr. W. Iali,
ac.uk
r this article is give
compatible hype
ible Exchange (
osis via magneti
rogression to
on of the toxic
we exemplify th
o cell assay. We
is due to the SABR
removal metho
e chromatograp
s produce a bol
Imaging (MRI)
strong magnetic
detailed imag
RI’s inherent low
water due to its
n methods turn
s and thus ope
r example,
used to create
metabolism of
nge Optical Pu
iagnosis of pul
proach to hype
te a non-Boltzm
of the identity m
Signal Amplific
own schematica
esentation of the
ble SAB
ner, [a] Wissa
Dr. M. J, Burns, P
en via a link at the
erpolarized bol
(SABRE) could
tic resonance im
pre-clinical/c
cology profile o
the cytotoxicity
We conclude th
SABRE catalyst.
ods, one inv
phy and the se
lus suitable for
is at the forefro
c fields, radio w
ges of the hu
w sensitivity, a
s high concent
n typically weak
en the door to
Dynamic Nu
e the signal str
pyruvate in pro
Pumping (SEO
lmonary disease
erpolarization ut
zmann nuclear
molecule of inte
cation by Reve
cally in Figure
SABRE effect
1
BRE: An
am Iali, [a] M
Prof. S. B. Duckett
e end of the docum
lus by
d open
maging.
/clinical
of the
of the
that the
t. Thus
volving
econd
future
ont of
waves
human
almost
ration
k MRI
o new
uclear
rength
ostate
EOP) of
ses. [2]
utilizes
r spin
erest.
versible
1. [3] It
can e
Reso
such
laten
typica
Simu
transf
low m
the
subst
A
nicot
simu
detect
in thi
to 50
appro
for in
meth
pharm
studi
Th
route
prima
throu
as si
The
proce
hydro
d2-M
cytot
An
SABR
the a
inform
There
toxici
subst
SABR
huma
catal
that co
n in vitr
Michael J. Bur
t
ment.
enhance the si
sonance (NMR)
ch as 1H, 13C, 1
nt polarization
cally [Ir(H)2(Su
ultaneous bind
sfer of polariza
magnetic field
catalytic comp
strate in solution
A recent study
tinamide and
ultaneously imp
ction and reduce
is study was m
0% polarizatio
oaching 2 minu
n vivo detectio
hyl nicotinate
maceutics, the
ied.
The isotopic lab
e to modify
arily affects the
ugh a pathway
significant rate ch
metabolic pat
ceeds via forma
oxy species ar
MN in compariso
toxicity analysis.
Another potent
BRE technique
adverse effects
mation is kn
refore we prese
city of the met
strate effects.
BRE reaction by
an cell lines a
lyst from soluti
could be progre
tro cytoto
urns, [a] V. H
signals detected
) spectroscopy15N and others.
of p-H2 throug
Sub)3(IMes)]Cl
ding of the su
zation through t
ds.[6] Subseque
plex allows th
n.
showed the e
d methyl
prove their SAB
ce magnetic re
methyl-4,6-d2-nico
on in conjunct
nutes.[7] This ma
ion. However,
e (MN) in
e effect of sele
belling of drug
their safety a
e biological fate
that involves h
changes occur
thway of nico
ation of the N-o
re also known.
son to MN is
s.
tial source of
is the iridium
s of iridium sa
known about
sent a thorough
tal catalyst in
We determin
by performing i
and present a
ion in order to
essed to in vivo
toxicity s
Hugh Perry[
d by MRI and N
across a wide
s.[4] It works by
gh binding to a
l,[5] as hy
substrate allow
the scalar cou
ent substrate d
he build-up o
effect of 2H-lab
nicotinate m
ABRE-enhanced
elaxation. The o
cotinate (d2-MN
ction with T1 r
makes d2-MN an
despite some
cosmetic
ective deuterati
molecules is a
and/or efficac
e of drugs that
hydrogen-carbo
due to the kine
cotinic acid der
oxide, though ro
. For this reaso
determined he
toxicity that
catalyst. Whilst
salts has been
organo-iridium
h investigation
n conjunction w
ne the biocom
in vitro cytotox
a method for
o create a bioco
vo measuremen
study[b] and Simon
Nuclear Magne
e range of nucl
y harnessing t
a metal cataly
ydride ligand
ws spontaneo
upling network
dissociation fro
of hyperpolarize
belling a series
molecules ca
d NMR and M
optimal substra
N) which gave
relaxation valu
n ideal candida
e applications
and veterina
ion has not be
a well-establish
cy.[8] Deuterati
t are metabolize
on bond breaki
etic isotope effe
rivatives typica
outes involving
son the toxicity
ere using in vi
arises from t
st some data
n reported[9], lit
m complexes[
into the potent
with solvent a
mpatibility of t
xicity analysis
deplet ion of t
compatible bol
nt.
on
etic
clei
the
yst,
ds.
ous
at
om
zed
s of
can
MRI
ate
up
ues
ate
of
ary
een
shed
ion
zed
king
ect.
cally
g 6-
y of
vitro
the
on
ittle[10].
ntial
and
the
on
the
lus
FU
R
Ev
M
hig
bi
co
to
ef
do
bi
fo
Ho
un
asc
to
in
est
eit
th
ob
wa
an
of
sim
IC
use
th
di
st
wh
pr
an
m
acr
Ef
SA
alco
so
aq
re
Ta
A5
MC
He
MD
FULL PAP
Results and
Evaluating the
Methyl-4,6-d2-nico
ighest 1H pol
iological persp
cosmetics due t
opical applicati
ffects at lower
oses.[11] Given
iological applic
or probing on
owever, wheth
nclear. In this st
scertain the bro
In order to
oxicity we beg
nhibitory conce
stablished cance
ither MN or d2-
he viability was
btained for each
as found to ran
nd interestingly
f the IC50 value
milar to MN. Im
C50 values (Ta
sed in a typica
hese results a
irectly in, the h
ill unclear how
here different
rovide a refere
nalysis. From t
methyl nicotinate
cross the cell li
Effect of SABR
SABRE induced
lcohol solvents
some applicatio
queous solutio
educed.[14] In o
able 1. Comparing
549
CF7
eLa
DA-MB231
PER
d Discussio
cytotoxicity of
cotinate (d2-M
larization leve
pective, MN is
to its percutan
ion and more
r doses and i
the substantia
cability, d2-MN
in vitro/in v
her d2-MN retai
study, we utilize
oader SABRE t
o establish the
gan by deter
centration) of
cer cell lines o
-MN at varying
s assessed by
ch cell lines is s
nge between 1
y, despite the d
es indicated th
mportantly, bot
able 1) and ar
al SABRE rea
are based on
high volume of
w the effect wou
solvents are
ence IC50 value
his analysis, w
e has no quant
ines studied he
RE solvents on
d polarization
s such as metha
ons can produ
on, though en
order to create
ring the IC50 of MN v
Methyl Nicot
(MN)
13.6
33.3
21.9
12.6
ion
of SABRE subs
MN) has been r
vels by SABRE
s widely used
neous penetrat
eover known f
inflammatory r
al SABRE enha
is considered
vivo tests for
ins the charact
ze d2-MN as a
toxicology prof
effect of select
rmining the I
MN and d2-M
of human origi
g concentration
y the MTT met
shown in Table
12.6-33.3 mM a
deuterium labe
hat the toxicity
th substrates h
re within the co
action (mM). It
the solubility
, the cell cultu
uld be under co
used. Nevert
e for optimizing
we conclude tha
tifiable effect in
ere.
on cell viability
n levels are t
anol-d4 or etha
uce hyperpola
nhancement l
e a biocompat
vs. d2-MN in huma
IC50 (mM)
tinate Meth
bstrate
reported to give
E to date. [7]
d as rubefacie
ion properties
for its vasodi
response at h
ancement level
d an ideal cand
SABRE dete
cteristics of MN
a model substra
ile.
ctive deuteratio
IC50 (half ma
MN. For this,
in were treated
ns for up to 48
thod. [12] The re
e 1. The IC50 fo
across the cell
elling, a compa
levels of d2-M
have millimolar
concentration r
is noted here
y of the subst
ure medium an
conditions of SAB
theless, these
g SABRE for fu
at deuteration
n modulating to
typically highe
anol-d6.[7, 13] How
arized substrat
levels are typ
tible hyperpola
an cancer cell line
hyl-4,6-d2-Nicotina
(d2-MN)
17.4
25.2
14.9
12.3
2
ve the
From
ent in
upon
ilatory
higher
ls and
didate
ection.
is still
rate to
on on
aximal
s, well
d with
h and
results
or MN
l lines
arison
MN are
(mM)
range
e that
strates
nd it is
SABRE,
data
urther
of the
oxicity
est in
wever
tes in
pically
arized
bolus
hype
dilutio
To
perfo
cells
D2O.
signif
cultu
over
show
durat
(Figu
ethan
over
solve
the re
evide
highe
solve
cytot
achie
durat
perfo
As
deter
quan
polar
mM
(30:7
found
at 9.4
supp
reduct
d6 as
enha
furthe
press
ongo
es.
ate
Fig
cell
h o
solv
and
**P<
viable);
s with high pola
erpolarization st
ion with D2O.
To assess th
ormed an appro
which were tr
. As shown in
ificantly reduce
ure medium an
the same tim
wed no chang
tions to 24 h,
ure 2 B). Where
nol-d6 in D2O (
long treatmen
vents mixtures (
results indicated
ent when the
er than or equa
vent mixtures is
toxicity analysi
eve an optimal
tion of exposu
orming SABRE
As the optim
rmined here i
ntify the effects
rization of d2-M
[IrCl(COD)(IM
70). After exposu
d that a 105 ±
.4 T. The corre
plementary info
ction in polariza
s solvent and p
ancement of ove
er optimization
ssure of p-H2 a
oing to improve
gure 2. Effect of d
ell viability performed
of treatment with
olvent volume in the
and D2O - deuterium
P<0.005 and ns -
iable); one-way ANOVA.
arization levels
step should be ca
he toxicity of
opriate cell viab
reated with va
Figure 2, viab
ced when ethano
nd treated for a
me point (6 h),
ge in cell viab
, however, sig
eas, we found
(30:70) solutio
nt times when
(Figure 2 B an
ed that a significa
solvent conta
als to 50%. Th
similar (see SI
sis on SABRE
biocompatibilit
sure on cells
E using higher (
mal solvent
is 30% ethan
s of using this
MN. Thus, we p
Mes)], 20 mM
sure to 3 bar p
22 fold total si
esponding 1H N
ormation (see Fi
zation when com
polarization und
ver 2800-fold.[7]
n may be ach
and isotopically
ve the polarizatio
deuterated solven
ed on the indicated
h deuterated solv
he cell culture me
ium oxide. Data
- Not significant
OVA.
s it has been su
carried out in e
these solve
bility assay on
various dilutions
bility of both th
nol-d6 (100%) w
a short time (6
, 50% ethanol
bility. Extendin
gnificantly redu
that treatment
on did not show
compared to
nd see SI Figu
icant reduction
ained ethanol-d
The behavior of
SI Figure S2). Fr
solvents we co
ity it is importan
in culture (or
(>30%) ethanol
mixture for
nol-d6 in D2O
solvent directly
prepared a sam
d2-MN in eth
p-H2 at 298 K in
signal enhancem
NMR spectra a
Figure S3). Th
mpared to usin
nder of 3 bar p-7] As we have p
chieved through
y labelled catal
on levels.
ent mixture on ce
ed cell lines after (
olvents at different
edium was 10%. E
represent mean
vs. the untreated
suggested that t
ethanol-d6 prior
nt mixtures w
A549 and MC
s of ethanol-d6
he cell lines we
was added to c
6 h). Converse
l-d6 in D2O (1
ng the treatme
uced the viabi
of cells in a 30
w toxicity to ce
other deuterat
ure S1). Togeth
n in cell viability
d6 concentratio
analogous pro
rom these in vi
conclude that
nt to consider t
r in vivo) wh
l-d6 solvent.
biocompatibi
O, we wished
ly for the SABR
mple containing
hanol-d6 in D
n a 60 G field w
ment is observe
are shown in t
his is a significa
ng 100% ethan
-H2 gave a sign
previously show
h using a high
lysts and work
cell viability: MTT
(A) 6 h and (B) 24
ratios. The final
EtOD - ethanol-d
+ SD. *P<0.05,
ed control (100%
the
r to
we
CF7
6 in
ere
cell
sely,
1:1)
ent
ility
0%
cells
ted
her
y is
ons
otio
vitro
to
the
hen
ility
to
SABRE
g 5
D2O
we
ved
the
cant
nol-
nal
wn,
her
k is
T
4
al
d6
5,
%
FU
Ev
Ha
to
M
d2
se
so
co
ce
re
hig
lin
wh
th
tre
de
by
wh
To
in
ex
of
tra
F
c
t
of
v
m
s
of
c
FULL PAP
Evaluating the
aving found t
oxicity to cells i
MN dissolved in
2-MN with MN
selective deute
solvents. Importa
composition and
cells when trea
espectively). Ho
igher than 5 m
nes (Figure 3 C
hen compared
he viability of M
eated for long
euteration migh
y itself or that t
hen mixed in a
Together, our da
n an ethanol-d6
xposure on cel
f our cytotoxici
ansient effect
Figure 3. Cytotoxi
cell viability data
treated for (upper
of MN and d2-MN
volume in the cell
mean + SD and ar
significant differenc
of MN) is shown.
control group; one
PER
cytotoxicity of
that 30% etha
in vitro, we the
n this solvents m
to exclude an
eration in d2-
antly, d2-MN sh
d it did not redu
ated for up t
owever, longer
mM, are shown
C and 3 D). Sur
d to MN, d2-MN
MCF7 cells at
g time (24 h)
ht affect the tox
toxicity is more
alcohol solvent
ata suggest tha
:D2O solvent m
lls in culture. It
city assessment
these compou
xicity of alcohol
showing (A and
panel) 6 and (low
solubilized in 30%
ell culture medium
are from 3 independ
ences from untreat
n. *P<0.05 and ns
e-way ANOVA.
of substrate in
anol-d6 in D2O
en performed vi
mixture. Again
ny toxic effect
MN when diss
shows good sol
uce the viability
to 6 h (Figur
r treatment time
n to affect the
Surprisingly, as sh
N induced a sig
this concentra
). This further
xicity effects of
e pronounced a
t at this long tim
at the in vitro cy
mixture depend
It is worth men
nt is to allow us
unds or solve
solubilized meth
C) A549 and (B
(lower panel) 24 h w
30% ethanol-d6 in D2
edium was 10%. Data
endent experiment
reated control group
ns - Not significant
n solvent
O does not in
viability assay fo
here, we comp
that arise from
ssolved in al
lubility in this so
y of A549 and M
re 3 A and
es at concentra
viability of bot
shown in Figure
gnificant reduct
ration (5 mM)
r indicates tha
the substrate e
as an additive
me (24 h) expo
cytotoxicity of d
ds on the durat
ntioning that the
s to understan
vents play unde
methyl nicotinate: M
and D) MCF7 cell
with different dilutions
2O. The final solvent
a are presented
ents (n=3). Statistically
(or from protio for
ant vs. the untreat
3
nduce
or d2-
pared
m the
lcohol
solvent
MCF7
3 B,
ations
th cell
e 3 D,
ction in
when
at the
either
effect
osure.
d2-MN
tion of
e aim
nd the
er the
state
bioco
the p
actio
appro
comp
utility
Eval
Give
d6:D2
SABR
be ta
effect
lines.
For t
of [Ir
d6:D2
cells
activa
differ
treatm
of tim
when
medi
SABR
point
To
catal
solut
[IrCl(
solub
active
activa
(see
emul
resul
d2-M
treatm
delet
be du
SI Fi
volum
mixin
volum
these
reduct
to the
Th
the a
elimi
Method
We h
catal
SABR
deact
polar
postu
MTT
ells
ons
ent
as
ally
orm
ated
ed conditions.
compatibility wo
pharmacokinet
on of the tre
oach requires
paratively shor
y and further re
luating the bioc
en that the cyto
2O (30:70) is
BRE reaction (co
aken as a bolu
ct of the SABR
s.
this, we prepare
rCl(COD)(IMes)
2O (30:70) and
to various bo
vated mixture
rent time perio
ment with the
me (1 h) did no
n lowest volum
ium. However,
BRE reaction m
t.
To distinguish
lyst in the m
tions containin
(COD)(IMes)] a
ble in ethanol-d
ve catalyst wi
vated with H2.
SI Figure S4
lsion to treat ce
lts. Nevertheless
MN alone and
ments over 24
terious effect o
ue to the prese
Figure S5). In co
mes of the [Ir
ng of the preci
mes and short
se data indicate
ction in cell via
e presence of a
Thus, we concl
amount of act
inated.
hod of catalys
have therefore
lyst from soluti
BRE reaction pr
ctivating the
rization levels
ulated that th
We are awa
ould be depend
tics of the org
eated materia
the contrast a
rt time prior to
educes toxicity
ocompatibility
otoxic dosage o
well above th
considering only
us for treatmen
RE reaction mi
red a typical SA
s)] together wit
d activated it w
olus volumes (
and assessed
ods by MTT ass
SABRE reacti
ot reduce the vi
me (e.g. 1.25%
, cells that were
mixture showed
the cytotoxic
mixture we pre
ng various con
alone. Unfortun
d6:D2O (30:70)
ithout the pre
Under these co
S4) and cytoto
cells is not ex
ess, we treated
no adverse
4 h on both ce
of the SABRE
sence of the cata
contrast, the ce
rCl(COD)(IMes)
cipitate showed
rt time points
e that the SAB
ability at higher
activated cataly
clude that in or
ctivated catalyst
st deactivation
e developed a p
ion. The additi
revents reversi
SABRE pro
whilst extendi
he addition of
are that in an
dent on physiolo
ganism and th
al. Nonetheless
agent to stay i
o excretion as
concerns.
y of SABRE rea
of d2-MN in the
he amounts use
y less than or e
nt) we sought t
ixture on A549
SABRE solution
h 20 mM of d
with 3 bar H2.
(1.25, 2.5, 5 a
d the viability
ssay. As illustra
ion mixture ove
viability of A549
%) was added
e treated with
d less viability a
c effect of the
epared in pa
ncentrations of
nately, [IrCl(CO
) and moreove
esence of a
conditions, a p
oxicity assess
xpected to pro
d the cells with
effect was ob
cell lines. This in
reaction mixtu
alyst and not th
cells treated w
s)], prepared b
d loss of cell vi
(see SI Figur
ABRE reaction m
r volumes and
yst.
rder to achieve
st has to be e
on and removal
protocol to rem
ion of a chelat
sible exchange
ocess without
ing T1 relaxat
bathophenan
n in vivo sett
logical status a
he mechanism
ss, the SABR
in the body for
relaxation lim
action mixture
e solvent ethan
sed for a typica
equal to 10% w
to investigate t
9 and MCF7 c
containing 5 m
d2-MN in ethan
We exposed t
and 10%) of t
of the cells
rated in Figure
ver a short peri
9 and MCF7 ce
d to cell cultu
10% bolus of t
at the same tim
e substrate a
arallel analogo
either d2-MN
OD)(IMes)] is le
ver cannot form
substrate wh
precipitate form
ssment using th
ovide comparab
a solution of t
bserved even
ndicates that t
ure on cells cou
he substrate (se
ith various bol
by homogeneo
viability at high
re S6). Togeth
mixture induces
this is likely d
ve biocompatibi
either reduced
move the SABR
ting ligand to t
of the substra
t affecting t
ion times.[15] W
nthrolinedisulfo
ing
and
of
RE
r a
mits
e
nol-
cal
will
the
cell
mM
nol-
the
the
at
4,
iod
cells
ure
the
me
and
ous
or
ess
an
hen
med
his
ble
the
at
the
uld
see
lus
ous
her
her
s a
due
ility
or
RE
the
ate,
the
We
onic
FU
aci
irid
sc
SA
ad
re
formation of a new hydride species at δ to
Fi
as
hig
bi
FULL PAP
cid disodium sa
idium center
schematically in
SABRE reaction
ddition of a so
eaction by 1H
formation of a new hydride species at δ o [Ir(IMes)(BPS)
Figure S7). Afte
s eluent less th
igh mass reco
iocompatible et
Figure 4. Evalu
2.5, 5 and 10 %)
are from 3 indep
PER
salt (BPS) wou
whilst giving
n Figure 5. F
n mixture in et
solution of 2.0 e
H NMR spect
formation of a new hydride species at δ BPS)(d2-MN)(H)2]C
er filtration thro
han 2% of the
overy of d2-MN
ethanol-d6:D2O
uating the biocomp
%) of SABRE reaction
independent experiment
uld see it irreve
an opportuni
First, we prep
thanol-d6:D2O so
eq. of BPS in D
ctroscopy reve
formation of a new hydride species at δ −19.6 which we attribute Cl and confirm
ough DEAE-Se
e catalyst rema
N, which can
solvent mixtur
mpatibility of SAB
ion mixture and cell
ents (n=3). *P<0.05
versibly bind t
ity to remove
pared the acti
solution prior t
D2O. Followin
als the imme
−19.6 which we attribute m by LC-MS (se
Sephadex® with
ains in solution
be delivered i
res. This proto
BRE reaction mi
ell viability was as
05, **P<0.005 and
4
to the
ve the
resul
proce
ivated
to the
ng the
ediate
−19.6 which we attribute see SI
h D2O
n and
in the
ocol is
there
after
were
when
d6:D2
supp
deact
seco
attrib
mixture: (A) A549 and
assessed 1, 6 and 24
ns - Not significant
ltant species
cedure
efore efficient a
Importantly, th
the deactivatio
e 74 ± 21 fold
n compared to
2O (30:70).
plementary inf
ctivation and d
conds longer th
bute the loss to
and (B) MCF7 cell
24 h thereafter by
ant vs. the untreated
via ion-exch
at removing the
he hyperpolariz
on and depletio
which represe
o the standard1H NMR sp
formation (se
depletion proce
han a standa
o relaxation effe
ells were treated wit
by MTT assay. Data
ed control (100% v
change chrom
is
e SABRE cataly
zed SABRE sig
on steps. The t
sents a 30% re
rd SABRE sam
spectra are
see SI Figure
cess takes a
ard sample m
ects.
ith different bolus
a are presented as
viable); one-way AN
matography. T
show
yst from solutio
gnal is still visib
total signal gai
eduction in sign
mple in ethan
shown in t
e S7). As t
minimum of
measurement, w
volumes (0, 1.25,
s mean + SD and
ANOVA.
This
wn
on.
ble
ins
nal
nol -
the
the
12
we
,
and
FU
Cy
m
Th
th
10
by
pe
Pl
SA
fo
F
[
c
Sep
FULL PAP
Cytotoxicity a
mixture
The cytotoxicity
hen evaluated
0 %) of the reco
y following the
erformed with
Pleasingly, 10%
SABRE reaction
or up to 6 h of t
Figure 5. Schem
[IrCl(COD)(IMes)],
catalyst [Ir(IMes)(B
Sephadex® leads
Figure 6. Achi
various volumes
experiments (n=
Figure 7. Evaluvarious volumespresented as mean
PER
assessment of
of the catalyst
by taking diff
constituted mix
e treatment co
the non-que
% of the bolus
n mixture did n
treatment (Figu
ematic presentati
, d2-MN and H2 in
)(BPS)(d2-MN)(H)2
leads to less than 2% c
ieving biocompati
es of catalyst deplet
(n=3). *P<0.05, **P<
uating the biocompes (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5 and
ean + SD and are
of catalyst
st depleted sa
ferent volumes
xture in ethanol
conditions in the
enched SABRE
s containing th
not alter the via
ure 6 A). Simila
tation of the catal
n ethanol-d6:D2O
2]Cl as confirmed
catalyst contamina
atible SABRE by
pleted SABRE rea
P<0.005 and ns - Not
mpatibility of biphand 10%) of the bolu
from 3 independen
depleted SA
mples on cells
s (1.25, 2.5, 5
l-d6:D20 (30:70
e same mann
E reaction mi
he catalyst dep
ability of A549
arly, MCF7 cell
alyst deactivatio
(30:70) solution. 2
ed by1H NMR spe
ination.
y deactivating th
eaction mixture for
ot significant vs. the
hasic SABRE reacbolus from the aque
dent experiments (n=
5
ABRE
s was
5 and
0) and
ner as
ixture.
pleted
9 cells
l lines
show
volum
to 1
Howe
at bo
and 6
it is
meta
these
catal
mixtu
on procedure: 1.
2. Deactivation -
pectroscopy and
the catalyst: MTT
or 1, 6 and 24 h.
he untreated cont
eaction mixture: Mqueous fraction ofn=3).
wed no change
mes (10 %) of
h and for up to
ever, longer tre
oth lower and h
6 B). It is noted
unlikely to sho
abolic activity
se data indicate
lyst could over
ure when treati
1. Activation - The
Addition of BPS l
LC-MS. 3. Deple
T viability assay s
. Data are presen
ontrol (100% viable);
MTT viability assaya SABRE reaction
es in cell viab
the catalyst d
o 6 h with lowe
eatments (24 h
higher volume
d that when ex
ow the same lo
and detoxifica
e that the de
rcome the adve
ing live cells un
he active catalys
leads to the immedia
epletion - Ion-exchan
showing (A) A549
ented as mean +
able); one-way ANOVA
ay showing (A) A54ion in biphasic solv
bility when tre
depleted SABR
er volumes (≤ 5 %, Figure 6 B). h) showed sign
es in both cell
xtrapolating to a
ong-term toxici
cation mechan
eactivation and
verse effect of
nder the conditi
st is formed thro
ediate formation of
hange chromatograp
9 and (B) MCF7 c
SD and are from
OVA.
A549 and (B) MCF7olvents for 1, 6 and
eated with high
RE mixture for
≤ 5 %, Figure 6 B). nificant decrea
lines (Figure 6
an in vivo mod
city due to high
nisms. Togeth
d removal of t
SABRE reacti
ions used here
hrough reaction of
of the deactivated
ography on DEAE-
cells treated with
m 3 independent
cells treated withand 24 h. Data are
her
up
≤ 5 %, Figure 6 B). ase
6 A
del,
her
her
the
ion
e.
of
ed
-
hare
FU
Ac
W
ap
wa
m
dich
ph
be
ph
10
ap
th
C
To
th
fu
pr
te
4,
leve
va
sh
ch
wi
co
ef15N
ar
m
ef
pr
6
et
so
co
Th
re
ach
diso
DE
m
ho
po
ap
bi
de
de
be
is
st
ca
FULL PAP
chieving bioc
We hypothesize
pproach to SA
ay to deplete
method the SAB
ichloromethane
hase. Converse
etween the two
hase was isola
0%) were adde
ppropriate viab
he previous se
Conclusions
To conclude, we
hat it is possib
uture in vivo de
re-clinical/clinica
echnology. We
,6-d2-nicotinate
evels and long m
values across a
shown that deut
change in toxico
ill provide impo
contrast agents
ffect of other co
N) as we furthe
re interested
molecules that ca
The solvent
ffect on cell su
roduced adverse
h. We overca
thanol-d6:D2O
solvent deuterati
We have sh
contributor in red
Therefore, we h
emove it from
chieve this
isodium salt (B
DEAE-Sephadex
minimal adverse
ours exposure
olarization. Fu
pproach to
iocompatibility a
We are curre
elivery method
epletion or sep
e used in a clin
the main so
rategies to re
catalyst.
PER
ocompatible SA
zed that using
BRE catalysis
the solution
ABRE catalyst
e (DCM) phas
sely, the hyper
o. For toxicity a
ated and variou
ed to the cell c
bility assay at d
ections. Treatm
s
e have shown t
ble to create a
etection. This
cal disease st
have exempli
e (d2-MN) which
magnetic lifetim
a number of h
teration of the
cology when com
ortant informati
in the future. W
common isotopi
er expand our
in the tube
can sustain long
composition w
survival rate in a
se effects on th
ame this by di
(30:70) showe
ion had no effe
shown that the
ducing the viab
have develope
solution by io
we add ba
BPS) and subse
x®. The elue
e effects on a
and retained 7
urthermore, t
SABRE cat
after separatio
ently working t
d that includes
paration method
nical setting. Ad
source of toxicit
educe toxicity
ABRE by Bipha
g the recently
could be a m
of the iridium
st is located i
se and minima
rpolarized sub
assessment on
us bolus volume
culture medium
different time po
ment with the
through in vitro
a biocompatible
is an importan
state diagnosis
ified our toxicit
ch shows stron
mes. [7] By deter
human cancer
substrate did n
mpared to its p
ion for the deve
We will also lo
ic labelling stra
substrate profi
rculosis drug,
g lived singlet st
was shown to
an in vitro assa
he cells over ti
ilution with D2O
ed no cell deat
ect over their pr
e iridium cata
bility of cells in
ed simple and
on-exchange ch
athophenanthro
sequently flush t
ent from this
a number of ce
70% of the init
the recently
talysis also
on of the aqueo
towards develo
s all of the pro
ds to exclude t
Additionally, as
ty, we are co
through furth
asic catalysis
y reported bip
more rapid and
m catalyst. [16] In
in a chlorofor
ally in the aqu
bstrate is distri
n cells, the aqu
es (2.5, 5.0, 7.5
m. We performe
oints as illustra
e phase sepa
o cytotoxicity st
e SABRE bolu
nt step toward
using the SA
ty study for m
ng hyperpolariza
rmination of the
cell lines we
not show sign
protio analogue
velopment of SAB
ook to determin
ategies (e.g. 13C
ile. For exampl
, isoniazid [17],
states [4f, 18].
have a subst
ay. 100% etha
ime periods of
O and found t
th over 24 h. Ag
rotio analogues.
alyst is the la
the SABRE m
d robust metho
chromatograph
olinedisulfonic
the solution thr
procedure sh
cell lines for up
tial SABRE ind
reported bip
leads to
ous phase.
oping an autom
oposed deactiva
the catalyst tha
the SABRE ca
considering syn
her changes to
6
phasic
facile
n this
rm or
ueous
ibuted
ueous
.5 and
ed the
ated in
arated
SABR
MCF7
minim
when
resul
react
produ
the
appro
Figur
bipha
d6:D2
studies
us for
ds the
SABRE
methyl -
zation
he IC50
have
nificant
e. This
SABRE
ne the
C and
le, we
, and
stantial
anol-d6
up to
that a
Again
s.
argest
mixture.
hod to
hy. To
acid
rough
howed
p to 6
duced
phasic
bolus
mated
vation,
at can
catalyst
nthetic
o the
Exp
Chem
Aldric
oxide
follow
methy
Cell c
cance
by Pr
adeno
Prof.
were
penic
(all fr
humid
media
conflu
Tryps
Treat
cells
exclus
well
treatm
exper
subst
maxim
origin
otherw
the to
MTT
tetraz
determ
functi
metho
it is d
repres
were
above
(untre
the c
BRE mixture di
F7 cells at any
mal cytotoxic e
n treated with
lt indicates tha
ction mixture is
uce a biocomp
polarization le
oximately 2000
re S10). Never
asic mixture is
2O solution
xperimental
micals and reag
ch, Fisher or Alfa
e (D2O) and chlor
wing compounds
yl 4,6-d2 nicotina
culture. The hu
er cells (MCF7),
rof. Christoph Bo
ocarcinoma ce
Thomas Kaufm
grown in DMEM
cillin (100 U/ml),
from Gibco, Life
dified atmospher
a were changed
uence (90%) th
sin-EDTA (Invitro
tment of cells.
were counted
usion. The require
tissue culture p
tment so that they
riment. Before
trate, catalyst or
mum of 10 µl in
nally prepared.
wise indicated) w
total volume of the
assay. The
zolium bromide)
mine in vitro cy
tional mitochondr
od, MTT - tetrazo
directly proportion
esents a measure
For this assay,
taken in triplica
e) or kept as c
eated) in cell gro
cell growth med
id not reduce
y of the time
effect seen he
the substrate
at the cytotoxici
negated by thi
patible bolus by
evel achieved
0-fold for the sa
rtheless, we co
s higher than
under 3 b
Section
gents. All chem
fa-Aesar. Deutera
roform-d (CDCl3)
were prepared
ate[19] and [IrCl(CO
uman alveolar ad
, cervical cancer
orner, IMMZ, Fre
ell line MDA
fmann, University
M supplemented w
streptomycin (10
fe Technologies).
re under standar
at regular interv
the cells were p
ogen) solution.
Immediately aft
in a haemocyto
red number of ce
plate (Nunc)) w
y are in exponen
treatment vario
r the SABRE re
the same solven
For cell assay
we kept the final
e cell growth med
MTT (3-(4,5-Di
assay is a com
ytotoxicity of the
rial dehydrogena
olium is reduced
nal to the numbe
e for cell viability
cells (normally 1
ates and treated
cell viability con
owth media. Afte
dia was replace
the viability o
points tested
ere is similar to
alone (see SI
city associated
is method. Whi
y this phase se
by the bipha
same substrate
conclude that p
that observed
bar p-H2 an
micals were purch
ated solvents (eth
)) were purchase
according to lite
OD)(IMes)].[20]
denocarcinoma c
r cells (HeLa) we
eiburg, Germany.
A-MB-231 was
of Bern, Switze
with 10% fetal bo
00 µg/ml) and L
. The cells were
rd conditions (37
vals and upon re
passaged after
fter Trypsin-EDT
tometer by Try
ells (normally 10
was seeded 24
ntial growth phas
ous volumes o
eaction mixture
nt from which the
ys, throughout t
amount of the so
dium (i.e. 10 µl in
imethyl-2-thiazoly
mmonly used colo
e given compoun
ase activity in liv
d to insoluble form
er living cells. Th
as well.
104 cells per wel
d with a range o
ntrol with no co
ter incubation at d
ed with fresh m
of either A549
(Figure 7). T
o the effect se
Figure S9). Th
with the SABR
ile we are able
eparation metho
asic catalysis
(d2-MN), (see
polarization in t
d in an ethan
nd at 298
hased from Sigm
hanol-d6, deuteri
ed from Sigma. T
erature procedur
cells (A549), bre
ere kindly provid
. The human bre
s a gift fr
erland. All the ce
ovine serum (FB
L-Glutamine (2 m
re maintained in
7°C; 5% CO2). T
eaching appropri
brief exposure
TA treatment via
ypan blue (Sigm
04 per well in a
hours (h) befo
se at the start of t
of the bolus fro
were diluted to
the compounds w
this study (unle
olvent to be 10%
n 100 µl).
yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2
orimetric method
nd by means o
ving cells [12]. In t
mazan crystals a
herefore, this ass
ll in a 96-well pla
of compounds (s
ompound treatme
desired time poi
media (100 µl) a
or
The
seen
This
SABRE
e to
od,
is
e SI
the
nol -
K.
ma-
ium
The
res:
east
ded
east
from
ells
BS),
mM)
n a
The
iate
to
able
ma)
96-
fore
the
from
to a
were
ess
% in
2H-
d to
of a
this
and
say
ate)
see
tment
ints
and
FU
inc
filte
me
cry
ab
nm
ab
DM
(i.e
of
the
Ea
an
Ev
dis
co
mi
MT
ca
Ca
mM
3.0
of
ba
2.0
elu
tre
eth
fur
Bip
[Ir
(1
an
ba
tre
ab
St
(n
the
an
(A
se
A
Th
fu
wi
C
Th
Ke
ca
R
FULL PAP
cubated with 10
ter (0.22 µm) ste
edium with MTT
ystals were solu
bsorbance of the
m using a mic
bsorbance value
MSO and the ab
.e. untreated) wa
the compound t
e untreated cont
ach assay was
nalysis of the data
valuation of IC
ssolved in cell
oncentrations of th
inimum of 1.25 m
TT assay after 4
alculated by using
atalyst deactiva
M) and d2-MN (2
.0 mL) was degas
3 bar. After 5 m
athophenanthrolin
.0 eq.) in water
uted through D
eatment on cells
thanol-d6 in D2O.
rther diluted as in
iphasic SABR
rCl(COD)(IMes)]
1.5 mL) and D2O
nd was degassed
ar. After phase se
eatment various
bove.
tatistical analys
n=3) and all data
e mean. The sig
nd the untreated
ANOVA) using G
et at P values <0.0
Acknowledg
The Wellcome
unding. We tha
ider CHyM tea
Conflict of in
The authors decl
eywords: SABR
atalysis • cytotoxi
References:
PER
µl of MTT (5 mg/
terilized) for 4 h in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C. The was then carefu
ubilized in 100 µ
e coloured (purpl
croplate reader
es (averaged ou
bsorbance of cell
as taken as 100 %
treated samples
rol sample and a
repeated for a
a.
IC50. For the e
growth media
the compound (ra
mM) in ½ serial d
48 h of treatmen
g Graphpad Priz
ation and remov
20 mM, 4.0 eq.)
ssed prior to the
minutes, the samp
nedisulfonic acid
(1.0 mL) was a
DEAE-Sephadex®
the eluent was v
. Prior to treatme
ndicated above.
RE - Biphas
(5 mM) and d2-
O (containing 0.9
d prior to the intro
separation the aq
volumes of the b
sis. All experimen
is presented as
gnificance of the
control was asse
GraphPad Prizm
.05.
gements
Trust (092506
ank Graham C
m for scientific
interest
clare no conflict
RE • hyperpola
icity
:
g/ml, dissolved in
h in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C. The ully aspirated and
µl of dimethyl s
le) solution was
r (MultiskanGO,
ut of triplicates)
ls exposed to ce
% viable (i.e. co
were then calcul
are normally expr
minimum of thre
evaluation of IC
and cells were
ranging from a m
dilutions. Cell via
nt. IC50 values of
m software.
val. A solution o
in ethanol-d6:D2
e introduction of h
ple was opened t
d disodium salt h
added. The resu
® (2.5 g) with
vacuum dried an
ent various volum
sic separatio
-MN (20 mM, 4.0
9% NaCl) (1.5 m
oduction of hydro
queous layer was
bolus were furth
nts were perform
s mean and stan
e differences betw
essed by one-wa
Software. Statis
6 and 098335
Cheetham, Ga
c discussions.
ct of interest.
arization • bioco
n cell growth med
h in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C. The d the formed form
sulfoxide (DMSO
then measured a
, Thermofisher)
were blanked a
ell growth medium
ntrol). The cell v
lated by normalis
ressed as % of c
ee times for sta
IC50, compounds
e treated with v
maximum of 80 m
ability was analys
of MN and d2-MN
of [IrCl(COD)(IMe
2O (30:70, total v
hydrogen at a pre
to air and a solu
hydrate (BPS) (1
ulting suspensio
water (11 mL
nd reconstituted i
mes of the bolus
n. A solutio
.0 eq.) in chlorof
ml) was mixed to
ogen at a pressu
s removed and p
her diluted as ind
med at least three
ndard deviation (
tween treated sa
ay analysis of va
stical significanc
5) are thanke
ary Green and
ompatibility • bip
7
dia and
h in a humidified atmosphere at 37°C. The mazan
O). The
at 570
. The
against
m only
viability
sing to
control.
tatistical
s were
various
mM to a
sed by
N were
IMes)] (5
volume
essure
ution of
10 mM,
on was
L). For
in 30%
s were
on of
oform-d
together
ure of 3
prior to
dicated
e times
(SD) of
amples
ariance
ce was
ked for
d the
iphasic
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
(a) J. Kurhanew
Comment, C. H.
Leach, S. S. Raja
Neoplasia 2011
Johannesen, A.
A. Kjar, America
2015, 5, 548-560
(a) P. Nikolaou,
Newton, S. Barc
Rosen, S. Patz
Proceedings of t
of America 2013
Walkup, B. M.
Dabaghyan, K. R
E. Y. Chekmene
32, 541-550.
K. D. Atkinson,
Green, J. López
Chemical Societ
(a) T. Theis, G. X
Huhn, V. Blum,
Warren, Science
Coffey, R. V. Sh
Warren, E. Y. C
2015, 137, 1404
Chemical Comm
Rayner, G. G. R
Journal of Physic
A. Burt, P. J. Ra
Duckett, Chemic
Roy, P. Norcott,
– A European Jo
Shchepin, C. P.
S. Warren, E. Y.
M. J. Cowley, R
Duckett, G. G. R
R. E. Mewis, Jo
6134-6137.
(a) R. W. Adams
Green, Journal
Aspers, B. J. A
Wijmenga, M. Te
66.
P. J. Rayner, M.
Green, L. A. R. H
National Academ
114, E3188-E31
(a) B. Belleau, J
102-104; (b) T. G
A. Bergman, U.
17.
K. S. Egorova, V
(a) L. C. Jumbelic
2006, 19, 147-15
Contact Dermati
T. Mosmann, J I
L. S. Lloyd, A. A
Cowley, G. J. De
R. Highton, A. J
Mewis, A. D.
Technology 2014
(a) M. Fekete, C.
D. Roberts, F. C
7870-7880; (b) P
K. J. Hermkens,
Tinnemans, M. T
Chemistry – A
Colell, M. Emond
X. Ortiz, P. Span
wicz, D. B. Vignero
. Cunningham, R.
jan, R. R. Rizi, B.
1, 13, 81-97; (b
E. Clemmensen,
an journal of nuc
0.
A. M. Coffey, L. L
rcus, I. Muradyan,
z, M. J. Barlow,
the National Acad
3, 110, 14150-141
. Gust, N. Whit
Ranta, G. D. Moro
ev, B. M. Goodson
M. J. Cowley, P.
z-Serrano, A. C.
ty 2009, 131, 1336
X. Ortiz , A. W. J.
S. J. Malcolmson
e Advances 2016
hchepin, K. W. W
Chekmenev, Journ
4-1407; (c) V. V. Z
munications 2015,
R. Green, L. A. R.
ical Chemistry B 2
ayner, S. J. Hart, A
ical Communicatio
P. J. Rayner, G. G
ournal 2017, 23,
N. Tanner, J. F. P
. Chekmenev, Che
R. W. Adams, K.
R. Green, J. A. B.
ournal of the Am
s, S. B. Duckett, R
of Chemical Ph
A. van Weerdenb
essari, Journal of
. J. Burns, A. M. O
Highton, R. E. Me
my of Sciences o
194.
J. Burba, M. Pinde
G. Gant, J Med Ch
Svedberg, E. Nils
V. P. Ananikov, Org
lic, F. T. Liebel, M
52; (b) N. Issacha
itis 1998, 39, 182-
Immunol Methods
Asghar, M. J. Bu
Dear, S. B. Duckett
J. J. Hooper, M. K
Roberts, A. J.
14, 4, 3544-3554.
. Gibard, G. J. Dea
Cisnetti, S. B. Du
P. Spannring, I. Re
, N. G. J. van der Z
Tessari, B. Blümi
European Journa
dts, A. W. J. Loga
nnring, Q. Wang,
ron, K. Brindle, E
. J. DeBerardinis,
. D. Ross, W. S. W
b) H. Gutte, A.
J. H. Ardenkjar-La
clear medicine and
L. Walkup, B. M.
, M. Dabaghyan,
E. Y. Chekmene
demy of Sciences
155; (b) P. Nikolao
iting, H. Newton
oz, M. S. Rosen, S
n, Magnetic Reson
. I. P. Elliott, S. B
Whitwood, Journ
62-13368.
. Logan, K. E. Cla
n, E. Y. Chekmen
6, 2; (b) T. Theis,
Waddell, F. Shi, B.
rnal of the America
Zhivonitko, I. V. Sk
, 51, 2506-2509; (d
. Highton, R. E. M
2015, 119, 5020-5
A. C. Whitwood, G
ions 2016, 52, 14
G. R. Green, S. B
10496-10500; (g)
P. Colell, B. M. Go
emPhysChem 201
D. Atkinson, M. C
. Lohman, R. Kers
merican Chemical
R. A. Green, D. C.
hysics 2009, 131
burg, M. C. Feite
f Magnetic Reson
Olaru, P. Norcott,
ewis, S. B. Duckett
of the United State
ell, J. Reiffenstein
hem 2014, 57, 359
sson, Contact Derm
rganometallics 201
M. D. Southall, Skin
ar, Y. Gall, M. T. B
-186.
s 1983, 65, 55-63.
urns, A. Charlton,
t, G. R. Genov, G
Khan, I. G. Khaza
Ruddlesden, C
ar, G. G. R. Green
uckett, Dalton Tra
eile, M. Emondts,
Zwaluw, B. J. A. v
ich, F. P. J. T. R
al 2016, 22, 927
an, K. Shen, J. Ba
S. J. Malcolmson
E. Y. Chekmenev,
, G. G. Green, M.
Warren, C. R. Mallo
E. Hansen, H.
Larsen, C. H. Niels
d molecular imag
Gust, N. Whiting,
G. D. Moroz, M.
ev, B. M. Goods
of the United Sta
ou, A. M. Coffey, L
n, I. Muradyan,
S. Patz, M. J. Barlo
nance Imaging 20
B. Duckett, G. G.
rnal of the Americ
laytor, Y. Feng, W.
nev, Q. Wang, W.
M. L. Truong, A.
. M. Goodson, W
an Chemical Socie
kovpin, I. V. Kopty
(d) M. J. Burns, P
Mewis, S. B. Duck
5027; (e) A. M. Ola
G. G. R. Green, S.
4482-14485; (f) S.
B. Duckett, Chemis
) D. A. Barskiy, R
oodson, T. Theis,
17, 18, 1493-1498
C. R. Cockett, S.
rssebaum, D. Kilgo
Society 2011, 1
Williamson, G. G
1; (b) N. Eshuis,
ers, F. Rutjes, S.
nance 2016, 265,
, M. Fekete, G. G.
t, Proceedings of
es of America 20
in, Science 1961, 1
95-3611.
rmatitis 1995, 32,
17, 36, 4071-4090
in Pharmacol Phy
Borrel, M. C. Poelm
, S. Coombes, M
G. G. R. Green, L.
al, R. J. Lewis, R.
Catalysis Science
n, A. J. J. Hooper,
ransactions 2015,
P. P. M. Schleker,
van Weerdenburg
Rutjes, M. C. Feite
77-9282; (c) J. F.
ae, R. V. Shchepin
n, E. Y. Chekmen
, A.
. O.
lloy,
H.
lsen,
ging
, H.
. S.
son,
ates
L. L.
M.
ow,
014,
. R.
can
. P.
. S.
. M.
. S.
ciety
yug,
P. J.
kett,
laru,
. B.
. S.
istry
R. V.
W.
8.
. B.
our,
133,
. R.
, R.
. S.
59-
. R.
the
017,
133,
14-
0.
ysiol
lman,
M. J.
. A.
. E.
e &
r, A.
44,
r, N.
rg, P.
ers,
. P.
in, G.
nev,
FU
[15
[16
[17
[18
[19
[20
FULL PAP
M. C. Feiters
Journal of the
5] R. E. Mewis,
Chemical Co
6] W. Iali, A. M
European Jo
7] P. Norcott, P
European Jo
8] S. S. Roy, P.
Chem Int Ed
9] P. J. Rayner,
Green, L. A.
National Aca
0] L. D. Vazq
Communicat
PER
s, F. P. J. T. Rutje
e American Chem
, M. Fekete, G. G.
ommunications 20
M. Olaru, G. G. R
ournal, DOI: 10.100
P. J. Rayner, G. G
ournal, n/a-n/a.
P. Norcott, P. J. Ra
Engl 2016, 55, 15
r, M. J. Burns, A. M
R. Highton, R. E.
ademy of Sciences
quez-Serrano, B.
tions 2002, 2518-2
jes, B. Blümich, T
mical Society 2017
. R. Green, A. C. W
015, 51, 9857-9859
R. Green, S. B. D
002/chem.2017027
G. R. Green, S. B.
ayner, G. G. Gree
5642-15645.
M. Olaru, P. Norc
. Mewis, S. B. Duc
s 2017, 114, E318
. T. Owens, J.
2519.
T. Theis, W. S. W
7, 139, 7761-7767
Whitwood, S. B. D
9.
Duckett, Chemist
716.
. Duckett, Chemis
en, S. B. Duckett,
rcott, M. Fekete, G
ckett, Proceedings
88-E3194.
M. Buriak, Ch
8
Warren,
7.
Duckett,
try – A
istry – A
Angew
G. G. R.
s of the
hemical
FU
E
It
qu
ph
FULL PAP
Entry for th
is possible to
uenching of ca
hase and no ca
PER
he Table of
o head towards
catalyst and sep
atalyst is carrie
Contents
s the destinati
paration via an
ed forward. Upo
ion, in vivo im
n ion-exchange
on exiting a bio
9
maging under S
e column. The
ocompatible me
SABRE with bi
second route,
edium is achiev
biocompatibility,
the biphasic ca
ved .
, via two route
catalysis, empl
es. One requir
loys the aqueo
res
ous