Upload
nagarajah-lee
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 1/25
Infrastructure
System &Process
People
Technology and Education
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 2/25
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 3/25
Backgro d
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 4/25
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 5/25
Th r ar 87 SMART
chool thro gho t
Malay ia
Backgro d
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 6/25
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 7/25
Backgro d
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 8/25
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 9/25
` Aft r 14 y ar of impl m tatio and m ch d of r o r ces, the ambitio s plan of making all Malaysian schools to become Smart School not only stagnatedb t r egr essed.
` Even the pilot Smart Schools have r everted back toµthe old way¶ of teaching and lear ning.
` Teacher s¶ of these pilot schools after being promisedwith µthe excitement¶ became demotivated.
` Ther e is no diff er ence in the performance of the SmartSchools compar ed with the normal schools.
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 10/25
School Performance
Teacher
T&Lmaterial
Syllab s & Infr a
Attit de & Aptit de
Knowledge & Skills
Psychology
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 11/25
` To identify the vario s f actor s that contrib te toteacher s¶ performance.
` To statistically validate concept al model r elatingthese f actor s.
` To cr eate a Management Sim lation Lab
The objective
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 12/25
Leadership
Environment
Belongingness
Personal Dev.
Collegiality
Personal
Reward
Cohesive
Pride
P
E
R
F
0
R
M
A
N
C
E
Morale Det.Performance
Morale Status
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 13/25
Staff Morale
» Per sonal Reward
» Cohesive Pride
Job Performance
»Job Role
»Job Accomplishment
»Wor k Habit
Morale Determinant Scale
Leader ship
Belongingness
Environment
Per sonal development
Collegiality
Respondents are required to ratetheir perceptions on a seven point
Likert scale
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 14/25
Constructs Cronbach Alpha Coefficient
Morale
1. Cohesive Pride 0.917
2. Personal Reward 0.926
Morale Determinant
1. Leadership 0.928
2. Belongingness 0.835
3. Environment 0.786
4. Personal Development 0.866
5. Collegiality 0.840
Job Performance 0.907
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 15/25
Variables Number Percentage (%)
GENDER
MaleFemale
41
51
44.6
55.4
AGE
20 to 40 years
41 to 50
POSITION
Management (Senior Assistance
and µKetua Bidang¶)
Ordinary Teachers
52
40
36
58
56.5
43.5
39.1
60.9
Teacher s from 4 SMART schools in
Ser emban
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 16/25
Leadership
Environment
Belongingness
Personal Dev.
Collegiality
Personal
Reward
Cohesive
Pride
P
E
R
F
0
R
M
A
N
C
E
The significance of the relationships were tested using the SPSS
AMOS software version 5.0
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 17/25
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 18/25
Causing construct Caused construct Std Coefficient p-value
Environment K6 Personal Reward 0.27 0.052
Personal development K7 Personal Reward 0.36 0.013
Collegiality K8 Personal Reward 0.05 0.047
Leadership K2 Cohesive Pride 0.013 0.051
Belongingness K3 Cohesive Pride 0.22 0.011
Environment K4 Cohesive Pride 0.414 0.001
Personal development K5 Cohesive Pride 0.74 0.000
Personal Reward F3 Cohesive Pride 0.17 0.05
Leadership K1 Performance 0.54 0.000
Personal Reward F1 Performance 0.13 0.04
Cohesive Pride F2 Performance 0.11 0.04
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 19/25
Per sonal r eward = 0.27(Environment) + 0.36(Per sonal
Development) + 0.05(Collegiality) + Error
Cohesive Pride = 0.013(Leader ship) + 0.22(Belongingness) +
0.41(Environment) + 0.74(Per sonal Development) + 0.17(Per sonal
Reward) + Error
Performance = 0.54(Leader ship) + 0.13(Per sonal Reward) + 0.11
(Cohesive Pride) + Error
Goodness of Fit measures of the structural model
Cmin/df = 2.21 ; GFI = 0.89 ; AGFI = 0.89 ; NFI = 0.88; Std RMSEA = 0.07
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 20/25
The str ct r al equation
Cohesive Pride = 0.013(Leader ship) + 0.22(Belongingness) +
0.41(Environment) + 0.74(Per sonal Development) + 0.17(Per sonal
Reward) + Error
Performance = 0.54(Leader ship) + 0.13(Per sonal Reward) + 0.11
(Cohesive Pride) + Error
Goodness of Fit measures of the structural model
Cmin/df = 2.21 ; GFI = 0.89 ; AGFI = 0.89 ; NFI = 0.88; Std RMSEA = 0.07
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 21/25
Display Gr aph
Per sonal Reward
Cohesive Pride
Performance
Leader ship
Environment
Belongingness
Per sonal Dev
Collegiality
Enter the Values
SubmitSensitivity
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 22/25
Performance
Leader ship
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 23/25
The findings of this study suggested that administr ator s
need to pay close attention to the f actor s aff ecting the mor ale of the teacher s since it is evident that these f actor s have significant influence on their mor ale status and jobperformance.
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 24/25
` The spirit of teamwor k needs to be inculcated and the management needs to provide avenue for r ewardingteamwor k.
` Cr eate a conducive wor king environment by fosteringteamwor k and constr uctive competition.
` Visionary leader ship that can set a clear dir ection is vital.
`
Reward teacher s¶ cr eative contribution.` Instill the sense of belongingness amongst teacher s by
providing opportunity to take pride in their wor k.
` Promote collegiality, wher e teacher s ar e encour aged toshar e the r esponsibilities.
` Provide ample opportunity for per sonal development inthe form of tr aining and development.
8/7/2019 ACEE 2011 Presentation 31-4-2001
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/acee-2011-presentation-31-4-2001 25/25
Questions and comments ar e welcome