ACCT 225 Team Evaluation

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/8/2019 ACCT 225 Team Evaluation

    1/1

    ACCTG 225 Team Evaluation Name Shant Al - Saiegh

    Firm Name KAY FIRM

    This evaluation will affect participation points earned by each of your group members. Please take time to complete itthoughtfully.

    Turning in the form: When you have completed it, fold it and turn it in to me directly or place it in my mailbox.

    Remember, if I do not receive your evaluation by Thursday, December 9, I must assume you assigned yourself 0 (zero)points and the remaining team points equally to your team members.

    Completing the form:

    Questions 1 through 6: Answer with words. Suggested answers are in parentheses below the question.Question 7: Answer with a number.*Question 8: Answer with words.

    * The points available by team are based on the number of team members multiplied by 10 points. For example, supposethe "A Team" has 4 members. An "A Team" member must allocate 40 points among herself/himself and the 3 other teammembers. The allocation cannot be equal across all team members (the evaluating team member cannot allocate 10 pointsto himself and 10 points to each teammate.

    Member #1 Member #2 Member #3 Member #41. Team Member Name Will Yu Michael Kim Shant Al-Saiegh

    2. Did this member complete his/her portion of the assignment? Regularly Always Regularly(always/regularly/sometimes/never)

    3. Did this member show ability to follow an idea suggested by Yes Yes Yesa teammate and to develop suggestions of his/her own?(yes/no/sometimes)

    4. Did this member come to class and to team meetings Yes Yes Yesprepared and ready to provide input? (yes/no/sometimes)

    5. Was the work provided by this member of equal quality Yes Yes Yesto that provided by other members? (yes/no/sometimes)

    6. Would you want to work in a group with this member Yes Yes Yesagain? (yes/no/never)

    7. OVERALL EVALUATION (number): 8.5 11 10.58. Comments (Required)

    Member #1 ____Will Yu is a great person to work with. He turned in his assignments regularly. Could have been betterwith suggestions and contributions to other peoples work.Member #2 Michael Kim is a hard-worker who helps his teammates. He was the leader in the group who put it alltogether.Member #3 I believe I provided great insight and quality work for my group and myself. I collaborated with Mike themost to figure out what needed to be done and got it together in a respectable amount of time. I provided suggestionsand was always wiling to help anybody out.Member #4 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________