Upload
bhava-nath-dahal
View
20
Download
3
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
power point presentationon accounting standards and Nepal Accounting Standards before issuance of Nepal Financial Reporting Standards.
Citation preview
National Assessment of Public Procurement System
27 January 2011
Procurement Assessment Procurement Assessment PhasesPhases
1 Objectives: Why Country Assessment?
2 Approach: How the Assessment?
3 Scope: Ministries, Local Govt., Parashatals
4 Methodology: BLI, CPI, API
5 Assessment Design6 Milestones 7 Budgets
2
Why Country Assessment?Objectives:
To quantitatively and qualitatively assess the national public procurement system, procedures and processes.
To find strengths and weaknesses of the national procurement system.
To understand the status of procurement reform, identify roles, and
To enable strategy formulation for harmonization.
3
Assessment Approach OECD/ DAC Methodology is best practice:
by Round Table Initiative of the World Bank and OECD. Used by Developing Countries assessment.
Assessment by Officials and ConsultantGON, Entity Officers,Consultants.
4
Assessment Methodology
5
How the System is Structured
How the System Actually Operate
How System Actually Applied
BLIs CPIs APIs
The AssessmentWhat is Structural
Framework- comparing to Best
practice
Base Line Indicators
(BLIs)
6
What is the performance level of
Structure we have
Compliance/Performance
Indicators (CPIs)
What is the performance level of
Structure in an entity
Agency Performance
Indicators (APIs)
Base Line Indicators
(BLIs)
Base Line Indicators
PILLAR I: Legislative Framework
7
PILLAR II: Institutional and Management
Capacity
PILLAR III: Proc. Operations & Market
Indicators
PILLAR IV: Integrity & Transparency
PILLAR : same weight Sub-Indicators
3
3
2
4
14
12
10
18
12 54Total Indicators
BLIs: Methodology
Assessor Group has formed for each pillar.
8
Assessors are from various Public Entity.
By - GON Procurement Experts
Assessor Group has consist of Procurement expertise (all have TOT)
Quality and Coordination by- Team Leader of each Pillar and Secretary (PPMO)
BLIs: Methodology
Each Group draft the results with sufficient evidences and comments regarding criteria and awarded weights .
9
The results (Criteria and awarded weights) shall be discussed with Focus Group from major procuring entities, experts and stakeholders.
Focus Group Discussion and Validation
Number of discussion groups shall be 16 (3 to 5 for each pillars). Agreed outcomes shall be published based on OECD Methodology
BLIs Output
10
CPIs are Based on BLI Survey based 13 Indicators;Survey based 13 Indicators;
Survey based 9 Indicators;Survey based 9 Indicators;
Survey based 6 Indicators;Survey based 6 Indicators;
Survey based 6 Indicators;Survey based 6 Indicators;
Pillar I
Pillar II
Pillar III
Pillar IV
Compliance/Performance Indicators
Total Total 34 IndicatorsTotal 34 Indicators11
CPIs and APIs – Methodology Eligible Consulting firm shall carry out the
CPIs Surveys and tabulates the out comes. Each indicator shall be discussed with PPMO,
TWG and Coordination Groups. The outcomes from APIs shall be discussed
with concern entity for validation. The final report shall be incorporated into
National Assessment.
12
CPI – How to be assessed?
CPIs are what actually the structure has implemented in the public entity.
Sample entity has fixed by TWG – 4 Ministries, 3 Local Governments, 2 security agencies and 4 independent entities.
Assessor shall be appointed through competitive RFP procedure.
13
Agency Performance Indicators
APIs are how actually the law and procurement structure implemented in a particular entity.
Sample is to be assessed by consultants on the methodology agreed by PPMO/TWG.
The sample shall be evaluated within same entity and marks shall be awarded in best practiced method. 14
Agency Performance Indicators
I
15
II
III
Sub- Indicators PILLAR/ Indicators Weights
3
Agency Professionalization Measures
Procurement Strategy 6%
16%
16%
28 100%Total Indicators
3
3
Organizational Structure
Agency Procurement Process- Competition 5 10%
Agency Procurement ….- Transparency 2 10%
Agency Procurement ….- Efficiency 5 10%
Effectiveness 5 16%IV Accountability Measures 2 16%
API Output
What could be the Outputs of APIs?
NANA Not Achieved (Less than 20%) PAPA Partially Achieved (At least 20% but
less than 70%) SASA Substantially achieved (At least 70%
but less than 90%) FAFA Fully Achieved (90% to 100%)
16
Cost and Milestones
BLI is assessed by PPMO Assessors and cost estimated Rs. Rs.15,42,000.00 – GON Fund. CPI and API is assessed by Consultant’s Assessors and cost estimated Rs. Rs.26,27,000.00 – GON Fund.
Time estimation is January 18 to July 30, 2011 (6 and a half months)
17
Other Country Assessment
There are wide practice of assessment of the national public procurement system. Some example countries are:
18
Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Philippines, Laos, Ghana, Botswana, Tanzania, Kenya, Malawi, Columbia, Paraguay,
From NPPSA
Thank you19