Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Accelerator Technology and Power Plant Design Accelerator Technology and Power Plant Design for Fast Ignitionfor Fast Ignition
Heavy Ion Fusion EnergyHeavy Ion Fusion EnergyBoris Sharkov (ITEP-Moscow)M.Basko,M.Churazov,, D.Koshkarev, S.Medin, Yu.Orlov, Parshikov A. N., Suslin V.M.
ITEP-MoscowIHED RASKeldysh IAM RAS
20th IAEA FEC Villamoura 2004
OutlineOutline•• Basic principlesBasic principles•• Target for FI IFETarget for FI IFE•• Energy release partitionEnergy release partition•• HI Accelerator HI Accelerator –– DriverDriver•• Reactor ChamberReactor Chamber•• Chamber Wall ResponseChamber Wall Response•• Power Plant Power Plant •• ITEPITEP--TWAC facilityTWAC facility•• ConclusionsConclusions
Driver efficiency ≥ 25%High repetition rate ~ 1-10 HzHigh reliability based on developed accelerator technologies
Principal motivation for cylindrical targets
Near-relativistic heavy ions with energies ≥ 0.5 become an interesting alternative driver option for heavy ion inertial fusion (D.G. Koshkarev).
Bi ions with energies 100-200 GeV have relatively long ranges of ~7-18 g/cm2 in cold heavy metals. Such ranges can be naturally accommodated in cylindrical targets with axial beam propagation.
Direct drive may become a competitive target option whenazimuthal symmetry is ensured by fast beam rotation around the target axis,axial uniformity is controlled by discarding the Bragg peak, and (possibly) by
two-sided beam irradiation,a heavy-metal shell (liner) is used to compress the DT fuel.
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
100
150
200
Axial profile of the beam energy deposition rate
Edep = 2/3 Ebeam
150 GeV Bi209 -> Pb (11.3 g/cc)full range = 1.21 cm
dE/d
z (G
eV/c
m)
z (cm)
ion beam
DT
M.Basko et al., HIF 2002
M.Basko et al., HIF 2002
Fast ignition with heavy ions: assembled configuration M.Basko et al., HIF 2002
With a heavy ion energy ≥ 0.5 GeV/u, we are compelled to use cylindrical targets because of relatively long ( ≥ 6 g/cm2 ) ranges of such ions in matter.
The ion pulse duration of 200 ps is still about a factor 4 longer than the envisioned laser ignitorpulse. For compensation, it is proposed to use a massive tamper of heavy metal around the compressed fuel:
Assembled configuration Ignition and burn propagation
t = 0 t = 0.2 ns
DT = 100 g/ccρ
100 GeVBi ions
100 mµ
0.6 mm
Pb
Pb
100 GeVBi ions
DT= 100 g/ccρ
Pb
Pb
Fuel parameters in the assembled state: ρDT = 100 g/cc, RDT = 50 µm, (ρR)DT = 0.5 g/cm2.
2-D hydro simulations (ITEP + VNIIEF) have demonstrated that the above fuel configuration is ignited by the proposed ion pulse, and the burn wave does propagate along the DT cylinder!
Slide 10: M.Basko, EPS2003.
Cylindrical FIHIF Target
Pb shell
DT fuel
L=8mm
Ignition
beamIgnition
beam
E=0.4MJ
t=0.2ns�
E=0.4MJ
t=0.2ns�
Compressing
hollow beam
E=7.1MJ, t=75ns�
Compressing
hollow beam
E=7.1MJ, t=75ns�
R=8mm
Slide № 6 Medin S.A. et al
Density distribution in compressed cylindrical target for FIHIF (t=30ns) M.Churazov 2004, 2D hydro
Slide № 8 Medin S.A. et al
FIHIF Driver Scheme The Third IAEA TM 11-13.10.04, Daejon, Korea
RFQRFQIS
Wideroe
Alvarez
Main linac
Pt+198 }
Pt 196+ }
Pt+194 }
Pt+192 }
Pt-198 }
Pt-196 }
Pt-194 }
Pt-192 }
Storage rings
IS=ionsource
compressing
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Pt +192
beam
ReactorChamber
Slide № 2 Medin S.A. et al
Beam parameters of HIF driver for fast ignition fusionStation
number
Ion energ
y (GeV
)
RF frequen
cy (MHz)
Bunch current
(A)
Momentum spread (x104)
Emittance(µm)
β=v/c
1 10-4 0.04 ±300 0.3 0.001
2 10-3 6.25 0.16 ±180 0.9 0.003
3 10-2 12.5 0.4 ±36 0.9 0.010
4 0.1 50 1 ±37 0.9 0.033
5 0.2 200 4 ±75 0.95 0.047
6 100 1000 230 ±2 1 0.745
7 100 Single bunch
20000 ±30 1 0.745
8 100 Single bunch
1600 ±20 1 0.745
Slide № 4 Medin S.A. et al
Slide № 4 Medin S.A. et al
−+,Pt 198,196,194,192
HIGH POWER HEAVY ION DRIVERIons
Ion energy (GeV) 100Compression beam
Energy (MJ) 7.1 (profiled)Duration (ns) 75Maximum current (kA) 1.6Rotation frequency (GHz) 1Rotation radius (mm) 2
Duration (ns) 0.2Maximum current (kA) 20
Ignition beamEnergy (MJ) 0.4
Focal spot radius (µm) 50
Main linac length (km) 10Repetition rate (Hz) 2x4 (reactor)Driver efficiency 0.25
−+,Pt 198,196,194,192
Ground plan outlinefor FIHIF power plant
Reactor andturbogenerator building
Reactor andturbogenerator building
Transfer lines for ignitionbeam
Transfer lines for ignitionbeam
Storagering
Storagering
Compressionring
Compressionring
Auxiliarylinac
Auxiliarylinac Transfer line for compressing beam, P
+
192Transfer line for compressing beam, P+
192
Ion sources andlow energy linac tree
Ion sources andlow energy linac tree
Main linacMain linac
10 km10 km
Storagerings
Storagerings
+
Pt
192
-19
8P
t1
92
-19
8
Pt
192
-19
8P
t1
92
-19
8
-
Slide № 3 Medin S.A. et al
REACTOR CHAMBER FOR FIHIF POWER PLANT
Slide № 11 Medin S.A. et al
REACTOR CHAMBER CHARACTERISTICSFusion energy per shot (MJ) 750
Repetition rate (Hz) 2
Li/Pb atom density (cm-3) 1012
Coolant temperature (oC) 550
Explosion cavity diameter (m) 8
Number of beam penetrations 2
First wall material SiC (porous)
Coolant tubes material V-4Cr-4Ti
Blanket energy multiplication 1.1
Slide № 12 Medin S.A. et al
CYLINDRICAL TARGETDT fuel mass (g) 0.006
Total mass (g) 4.44
Length (mm) ~8.0
ρR parameter (g/cm2) 0.5
Burn fraction 0.39
Gain 100
Fusion yield (MJ) 750
Energy release partitionX-ray (MJ) 17
Ion debris (MJ) 153
Neutrons (MJ) 580
The Third IAEA TM 11-13.10.04, Daejon, Korea
Slide № 7 Medin S.A. et al
Temporal profiles of X-radiation characteristics for FIHIF cylindrical target
2 00 4 00 6 00 8 00 10 00 12 000
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
5 0
X-r ay ener gy
P ow er
Te m pe rature
X-ra
y en
ergy
, MJ;
Pow
er, T
W;
Tem
pera
ture
, eV
T im e, n s
Slide № 9 Medin S.A. et al
Pressure distribution in liquid film at different times
0.0e0 5.0e0 1.0e1 1.5e1 2.0e1Lagrangian coordinate, kg m-2
0.0e0
1.0e8
2.0e8
3.0e8
4.0e8
Pres
sure
,Pa
t=100 nst=500 nst=1000 ns
Shock wave profiles generated by X-ray radiation in liquid film at the first wall
The Third IAEA TM 11-13.10.04, Daejon, Korea
Slide № 13 Medin S.A. et al
Slide № 14 Medin S.A. et al
0.0e0 2.0e-3 4.0e-3 6.0e-3 8.0e-3
Lagrangian coordinates, kg m-2
1.1e3
3.0e3
8.1e3
2.2e4
6.0e4
1.6e5
4.4e5
1.2e6
3.3e6
8.9e6
Tem
pera
ture
, K t = 100 nst = 500 nst =1000 ns
Temperature profile in liquid protecting layer of the first wall
The Third IAEA TM 11-13.10.04, Daejon, Korea
Vaporization rate of liquid film on the first wall
Temporal evolution of the evaporated mass
0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 6 0 0 7 0 00 ,0
0 ,2
0 ,4
0 ,6
0 ,8
1 ,0
1 ,2
1 ,4
Vap
oriz
ed m
ass,
kg
T im e , n s
Slide № 15 Medin S.A. et al
Evaporation-condensation dynamics
0,00 0,02 0,04 0,06 0,08 0,100,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
Tem
pera
ture
, 3.5
x105 K
Time, µs0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,00
2
4
6
8
10
Den
sity
, 1.2
3x10
23m
-3
Time, msSlide № 16 Medin S.A. et al
Slide № 10 Medin S.A. et al
FIHIF target neutron pulse
94 95 96 97 98 99 1001E201E211E221E231E241E251E261E271E281E291E301E31
2.45 MeV
14 MeV
Neu
tron
on fl
uenc
e, n
/s
Time, ns
Pressure distribution in FIHIF blanket at different times
(a)
PbLi
PbLi
PbLi
SiC VCrTi
Ht-9
PbLi
Firs
t wal
l
4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,5-40
-20
0
20
40
60
300µs
200µs100µs
time=0µs
Pres
sur e
,MPa
Radial distance, m
(b)
Slide № 18 Medin S.A. et al
FIHIF Blanket Structure and Neutron Energy DepositionMaterial ofblanket zones
R, cm ∆R, cm ρ, g/cm3
M, 103 kg
Q/V,MJ/m3
Q, MJ
1. PbLi2. PbLi3. SiC/PbLi4. PbLi5. V/4Cr/4Ti6. PbLi7. V/4Cr/4Ti8. PbLi9. V/4Cr/4Ti10. PbLi11. V/4Cr/4Ti12. PbLi13. V/4Cr/4Ti14. PbLi15. V/4Cr/4Ti16. PbLi17. V/4Cr/4Ti18. HT-919. Concrete
400,0400,0400,2401,0407,0407,4413,4413,8419,8420,2426,2426,6432,6433,0439,0439,4445,4446,4452,0
4000,20,86,00,46,00,46,00,46,00,46,00,46,00,46,01,06,0400
3,4⋅10-10
9,05,79,05,99,05,99,05,99,05,99,05,99,05,99,05,97,92,0
10-7
3,39,3110,84,9113,65,0116,15,1119,75,2123,75,4128,85,6133,014,5112,2-
5⋅10-9
23,820,718,58,912,26,16,52,84,11,11,50,80,90,20,30,10,07-
1,3⋅10-6
8,833,7237,77,4164,05,288,82,455,50,923,60,713,30,24,40,21,0Total:647,8
The Third IAEA TM 11-13.10.04, Daejon, Korea
∆T, K
66,613,05,111,12,87,31,74,00,92,00,50,90,20,40,10,20,050,01
Slide № 17 Medin S.A. et al
Pressure distribution in FIHIF blanket at different times
4 ,0 4,1 4,2 4 ,3 4,4 4,5-40
-20
0
20
40
60
3 0 0 µ s
2 0 0 µ s1 0 0 µ s
t=0
Pres
sure
, MPa
R a d ia l d ist an ce , m
The Third IAEA TM 11-13.10.04, Daejon, Korea
Slide № 19 Medin S.A. et al
Pressure, Temperature and Radial stresstemporal evolution in FIHIF blanket
The Third IAEA TM 11-13.10.04, Daejon, Korea
Slide № 20 Medin S.A. et al
Von Mises fluidity criteriumDetermination of material state in blanket design under neutron pulse impact
Temporal variation of equivalent stress normalized by yield stress Y (Y= 35 MPa for SiC/PbLi and 280 MPa for V-Cr-Ti).
The von Mises criterion determines elastic/plastic material behaviour.
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 200,0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1,0
Intermediate wall of VCrTi
First wall (porous SiC/liquid PbLi)(3
J 2/2Y2 )1/
2
Time, ms
( ) 2/12 2/3Jeq =σ
1/ ≤Yeqσ
The Third IAEA TM 11-13.10.04, Daejon, Korea
Slide № 21 Medin S.A. et al
• The reactor chamber with a wetted first wall has a minimum number of ports for beam injection. • A massive target significantly softens the X-ray pulse resulting from the microexplosion. • A two-chamber reactor vessel mitigates the condensation problem and partly reduces the vapor pressure loading. • Three loops in the energy conversion system make it easier to optimize the plant efficiency and to develop the thermal equipment.
ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEM
Primary coolant loop Li17 Pb83
Max./min. temperature (oC) 550/350
Mass flow rate (ton/s) 13.1
Pump power (MW) 11.6
Intermediate coolant loop Na
Max./min. temperature (oC) 500/300
Mass flow rate (ton/s) 6.40
Pump power (MW) 3.77
Steam cycle
Steam parameters (MPa/oC/oC) 18/470/470
Net efficiency 0.417
Power plant parameters
Net power (per 1 chamber) (MW) 670
Net efficiency 0.373Slide № 23 Medin S.A. et al
ITEP-TWAC project in progress
• >10¹º C6+ accumulated• accelerated up to 4
GeV/u
B.Sharkov ITEP
Non-Liouvillian stacking process
Ni > 10^10
Процесс накопления ядер С 6+
ВЧ группировка пучка
170 нс
RFRF :: fofo == 695 695 ккHzHz, 10 , 10 ккVV
Ion accumulation С6+ in U-10 (213 MeV/u)
Линейный рост интенсивности ~ 100 c (> 30 циклов)
2·1010
Максимальная интенсивностьСнижение темпа накопление
Accelerator Technology Issues
• High current injection,
• Accumulation / stacking
• Bunch compression,
• IBS and vacuum instability
• Fast extraction
• Beam transport and focusing
• Generation of hollow beams –“wobbler”
High energy density experimental area
0 m 10 m 20 m
UK-ring
U10-ring
SM
M1
M2
9394
9192
95
9697
9899
910911
912913
915
Target
F1
Build
ing
120
ITEPITEP--TWACTWAC
ion beam
Cylindrical implosionexperiment300 MHzwobbler
Development of Diagnostic Methods
V is ib le an dU ltrav io le tD ia gnos tic
N eu tro n and ra y D ia gnos tic
γ -
Io n b eam
T arg e t
E xp erim en ta lM easu rem en ts
o f E O S P aram e te rs
X -ra y D ia gnos tic o f
T a rge t and In itia l B eam
E nerg y loss
d ia gnos tic
F o cu s in g S ys tem
B eam D iag n o s tic
X-ray back-lighting
CONCLUSIONS : - a power plant concept for fast ignition HIF is formulated, which is consistent with the newly proposed driver–target–chamber design.
- ITEP-TWAC facility is suitable for accelerator technology developments:
• Positive features :• A massive target significantly softens the X-ray pulse resulting from the microexplosion. • The reactor chamber with a wetted first wall has a minimum number of ports for beam injection. • A two-chamber reactor vessel mitigates the condensation problem and partly reduces the vapor pressure loading. • Three loops in the energy conversion system make it easier to optimize the plant efficiency and to develop the thermal equipment.
Problems of concern:
driver length,
target positioning in flight,
the of vapor fog problem in the chamber,
pressure-stress pulsations in the blanket.
Experiments in frame of IAEA CRP
HEAVY IONHEAVY IONBEAMSBEAMS
HED Ph.
Material science
MedicineAdvanced diagnostics
Rel. nuclearPh.
CBM
antique Goddess of Fertility
Roma-Tivoli 2004
AcceleratorPhysics
Post Post ScriptumScriptum
IFEIFE