Upload
clarissay1
View
46
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TUTORIAL 6ACC2002
Done By: Liu Xiaoxuan U072692BTan Sze Huay Bestia U096840RHo Qi Lin U097079UOoi Yi Yee Clarissa A0071956W
Tutorial Group B17
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 1a
1. Components of Standard Costing System Direct Material Standards/Labor Rate Standards:o Material Price Standardso Material Quantity Standards
Direct Labor Standardso Labor Rate Standardso Labor Efficiency Standards
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 1a
Material Price Standards/Labor Rates Standards
Accounting department, quality control department, production department
1A) Who should be involved in setting the standards?
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 1a
• Material Quantity Standards/Labor Efficiency Standards:– Sales department, production department
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 1b
•Material Price Standards/Labor Rate Standards•Discounts, freight, quality, payroll taxes, fringe benefits,
qualifications.
1B) What factors should be considered in establishing the standards?
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 1b
•Material Quantity Standards/Labor Efficiency Standards:•Historical experience, engineering studies, input
from operating personnel.
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 2
•Materials Use VarianceResponsibility: Production ManagerReason: The manager can ensure that the standard is
met through methods such as minimizing scrap, wastes and rework.
2. Who will be assigned for each and for resulting variances?
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 2
•Materials Price VarianceResponsibility: Purchasing Supervisor
(under Production department)
Reason: Price of materials is largely beyond his/her control; however the price variance can be influenced by factors such as quality, quantity discounts, distance of the source from plants etc which are under control of the purchasing manager.
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 2
• Labor Use VarianceResponsibility: Production Manager
Reason: Methods to promote the efficiency of labors are under control of the production manager. Examples of such methods are: allocating employees based on their skills, increase quality of trainings, increase quality of production supervision and increase motivation level of employees.
Problem 10-39 (P.447) Part 2
• Labor Wages VarianceResponsibility: Production Manager
Reason: Production manager is able to ensure standards are met through mixing different skill levels employees to work tasks.
Problem 10-42 (P.447)
Problem 10-42 (P.447) Part 1
1. Computation of Material Price Variance
Problem 10-42 (P.447) Part 1
1. Computation of Material Quantity Variance
Problem 10-42 (P.447) Part 1
Recommend purchasing agent to continue buying this quality because total overall material variance is favorable.
Problem 10-42 (P.447) Part 2
2. Computation of Labour Rate Variance
Problem 10-42 (P.447) Part 2
New manufacturing process should be discontinued because overall total labor variance is unfavorable.
Problem 10-42 (P.447) Part 3
3. Computation of NEW Labor Rate Variance
Problem 10-42 (P.447) Part 3
3. Computation of NEW Labor Efficiency Variance
Problem 10-42 (P.447) Part 3
3. Computation of Annual Savings
• New process should be adopted because total projected annual savings is favorable.
Standard cost system would help Crunchy Chips
(i)To improve planning and control and,
(ii)To facilitate product costing
1. Discuss the benefits of a standard costing system for Crunchy Chips.
Question 6 Part 1
Question 3 : Problem 10-42
Standard quantity
Standard Price Standard Cost
Direct Material 25 quarts $4/quart $100 Direct Labor 0.768 hours $15/hour $11.52 Variable Overhead 0.768 hours $8/hour $6.14 Fixed Overhead 0.768 hours $12/hour $9.22 Total Standard Cost $126.88 Standard Cost = Standard Quantity * Standard Cost
Requirement 1
Question 3 : Problem 10-42
Actual Hour = 1.280hr * 320 units = 409.6hr
Standard Hour = 0.768hr * 320 units = 245.76hr
LEV= SR(AH - SH)= $15(409.6 – 245.76)= $ 2457.60
Since actual hour is more than standard hour, an unfavorable labor efficiency will be expected.
Requirement 2
Requirement 3
1st unit 320th unitTime taken is longer
Time taken is shorter
640th unitSame time taken for each unit here
Since cumulative average time per unit takes into account the
average time of previous serviced unit, cumulative average time
per unit at 640 will be shorter than the cumulative average time
per unit at 320.
Cumulative Average time per unit
=Total time Total units
Requirement 3 (con’t)
640 units * 1.024 hr – 320 units * 1.280 hr
320 units
= 0.768 hr per unit
0.768 hr per units is a good choice for per unit labor
standard as it is the average most efficient time per unit after
the learning effects are achieved.
Question 4: Problem 10-44
Standard quantity Standard PriceDirect Material: Liquids 1,050,000 ounces $0.25 per ounce Bottles 250,000 bottles $0.05 per bottleDirect Labor 50,000 DLH $12.50 per DLHVariable overhead 50,000 DLH $4.70 per DLHFixed overhead 50,000 DLH $1.00 per DLH
Actual quantity Actual PriceDirect Material: Liquids 1,150,000 ounces $0.27 per ounce
Bottles 250,000 bottles $0.048 per bottle
Direct Labor 48,250 DLH $12.90 per DLH
Requirement 1
Direct material standard cost= liquids standard cost + bottles standard cost= $275,000
Upper limit = $295,000
Lower limit = $275,000
Liquids standard cost= SP * SQ= $0.25 * 1,050,000 ounces= $262,500
Bottles standard cost= SP * SQ= $0.05 * 250,000 bottles= $12,500
Requirement 1 (con’t)
Direct labor standard cost= SR * SH= $12.50 * 50,000 DLH= $625,000
Upper limit = $645,000
Lower limit = $605,000
Overhead standard cost= VOH + FOH= $0.94 * 250,000 + $0.20 * 250,000= $285,000
Upper limit = $305,000
Lower limit = $265,000
Requirement 2
Bottle price variance= AQ(AP – SP)= 250,000($0.048 - $0.05)= $500 F
Bottle usage variance= SP(AQ – SQ)= $0.05(250,000 – 250,000)= $0
Liquids price variance= AQ(AP – SP)= 1,150,000($0.27 - $0.25)= $23,000 U
Investigate!
Liquids usage variance= SP(AQ – SQ)= $0.25(1,150,000 – 1,050,000)= $25,000 U
MPV = Liquids price variance + bottle price variance = $23,000 U + $500 F = $22,500 U
MUV = Bottle usage variance + Liquids usage variance = $0 +$25,000 U = $25,000 U
Total direct material variance = MPV + MUV= $22,500 U + $ 25,000 U= $47,500 U
Requirement 2 (con’t)
Requirement 3
LRV = AH(AR – SR) = 48,250($12.90 - $12.50) = $19,300 U
LEV = SR(AH – SH) = $12.50(48,250 – 50,000) = $21,875 F
Total labor variance = LRV + LEV= $19,300 U + $21,875 F= $2,575 F
Investigate!
Qn 5. Problem 10-48 (p.453)Req 1:
AP = $4.70/lbsAQpurchased = 260,000 lbs
AQused = 260,000 + 60,000 = 320,000 lbs
SP = $5.00/lbsSQ = 6.0 x 50,000 = 300,000 lbs
MQV = SP (AQused - SQ) = $5.00 (320,000 – 300,000) = $100,000 U
MPV = AQpurchased (AP – SP) = 260,000 ($4.70 - $5.00) = $78,000 F
Materials usage variance is more controllable.
Production manager is generally responsible for materials
usage variance
o Minimize scrap, waste and rework to ensure that
standards are met
Materials price variance:
o Price of materials determined by market forces, thus
beyond control
o BUT price variance can be influenced by factors such as
quality, quantity discounts, distance of the source from
the plant etc., which are under the control of the
purchasing agent.
o But generally less controllable
Req 2AR = $1,066,000 / 82,000 hrs = $13/hrAH = 82,000 hrsSR = $12/hrSH = 1.6 hrs/unit x 50,000 units = 80,000 hrs
• LRV = AH (AR – SR)= 82,000 ($13 - $12)= $82,000 U
• LEV = SR (AH – SH)= $12 (82,000 – 80,000) = $24,000 U
Production manager usually responsible for the labor efficiency variance
Possible causes:oMismatch of skill level to tasksoLack of motivationoPoor quality of production
supervisiono Inadequate training provided to
employees
Req 3
MPV = $78,000 FMQV = $100,000 ULRV = $82,000 ULEV = $24,000 U
Net savings/loss = $78,000 - $100,000 - $72,000 - $24,000 = $128,000 U
• Net loss of $128,000 due to total material variances & total labor
variances.
• Should discontinue usage of cheaper raw material.
• Material price & Labor rate less controllable, since they are usually
determined by external market forces.
oMaterial price (AP – SP = $0.30)
oLabor rate (AR – SR = $1)
• Need to revise standards for:
oMaterial standard quantity (AQused – SQ = 20,000 lbs)
oLabor standard hours (AH – SH = 2,000 hrs)
More significant differences
• Material quantity & Labor hour standards may have been set too
high, resulting in large variances.
Req 4
Dr Raw Materials $1,300,000*
Cr MPV (F) $78,000
Cr Accounts Payable $1,222,000**
Calculations:
*AQpurchased x SP
= 260,000 lbs x $5.00/lbs
= $1,300,000
**AQpurchased x AP
= 260,000 lbs x $4.70/lbs
= $1,222,000
Dr Work-in-process $1,500,000*
Dr MQV (U) $100,000
Cr Raw Materials $1,600,000**
Calculations:
*SQ x SP
= 300,000 lbs x $5.00/lbs
= $1,500,000
** AQused x SP
= 320,000 lbs x $5.00/lbs
= $1,600,000
Dr Work-in-process $960,000*
Dr LRV (U) $82,000
Dr LEV (U) $24,000
Cr Wages payable $1,066,000**
Calculations:
*SR x SH = $12/hr x 80,000hrs = $960,000
**AR x AH = $13/hr x 82,000hrs = $1,066,000
Dr Work-in-process $600,000
Cr Manufacturing Overhead $600,000*
Calculations:
Standard overhead rates = $12 / 1.6hrs = $7.50/hr
* Manufacturing overhead cost = $7.50/hr x 1.6 hrs x 50,000 units = $600,000
i. By developing unit price and quantity standards, an overall variance can be decomposed into price variance and a usage or efficiency variance.
This allows Edward Golding to know if the variance is favourable or unfavourable.
By the standard cost system, Edward will know whether the variance is attributed to discrepancies between planned usage and actual usage or both. Hence, it provides specific signals regarding the need for corrective action and where the action should be focused. As a result, it improves the operational control of Crunchy Chips.
Question 6 Part 1
ii. Standard cost system helps to have greater capacity for control of product costing. It provides readily available unit cost information that can be used for pricing decisions at any time throughout the period because actual costs (direct or indirect) do not need to be known.
Question 6 Part 1
The engineering study may reveal the ideal standards (peak/maximum output) which can only be achieved if everything operates perfectly. Hence, the President should set currently attainable standards which can only be achieved under efficient operating conditions.
This implies that the standards should be set at hours that are 10% higher than the ideal standards revealed by the engineering study.
Question 6 Part 2
2. Discuss the President’s concern about using the result of the engineering study to set the labour
standards. What standards would you recommend?
Manufacturing Processes
Original Standard Hours
New Standard Hours*
Raw Potato Inspection 3200 3520
Finished Chip Inspections
12000 13200
Frying Monitor 6300 6930
Boxing 16600 18260
Machine Operators 6300 6930
*New Standard Hours = Original Standard Hours X (100 + 10)%
Question 6 Part 3
3. Develop a standard cost sheet for Crunchy Chips’ plain potato chips
Direct MaterialsDirectMaterials
Cost / $ Amount Used Per Bag of Chips
Cost Used Per Bag of Chips/ $
Potatoes 0.245 / pound (4 X 4.25 X 0.0625) = 1.0625 pound
(0.245 X 1.0625) = 0.260
Cooking Oil 0.04 / ounce 3.3 ounce (0.04 X 3.3) = 0.132
Bags 0.11 / bag 1 bag 0.11
Boxes 0.52 / box 1/15 box (0.52 X 1/150) = 0.0347
Total Cost Per Bag
0.537*
* Do not forget about the potato pieces that are sold to the animal feed producers
Direct MaterialsAmount of Potatoes used to produce one bag of chips
= 4.25 X 4
= 17 ounce
Amount of Potatoes used in one bag of chips = 16.3 ounce
Hence, rejected amount of potatoes per bag of chips
= 17 -16.3
= 0.7 ounce
Cash received for selling off rejected amount of potatoes per bag
= 0.7 X 0.0625 X $0.16
= $0.007
Direct MaterialsDirectMaterials
Cost / $ Amount Used Per Bag of Chips
Cost Used Per Bag of Chips/ $
Potatoes 0.245 / pound
(4 X 4.25 X 0.0625) = 1.0625 pound
(0.245 X 1.0625) = 0.260
Cooking Oil 0.04 / ounce 3.3 ounce (0.04 X 3.3) = 0.132
Bags 0.11 / bag 1 bag 0.11
Boxes 0.52 / box 1/15 box (0.52 X 1/150) = 0.0347
Rejected amount of Potato Pieces
0.16 / pound
(0.0625 X 0.7 ) = 0.04375
0.007
Total Cost Per Bag
0.530
-=
Direct Labour
Direct Labour Hours Needed Cost per hour / $
Cost / $
Raw Potato Inspection
3520 15.20 53,504
Finished Chip Inspection
13200 10.30 135,960
Frying Monitor 6930 14.00 97,020
Boxing 18260 11.00 200,860
Machine Operators 6930 13.00 90,090
Total Cost 577,434
Direct Labour Cost per bag of chips = $577,434 / (8.8 X 106)= $0.0656
OVERHEADVariable Overhead
= (116/100) X $577,434
= $669,823.44
Fixed Overhead = $1,135,216
Total Overhead Cost = Variable OH + Fixed OH
= $669,823.44 + $1,135,216
= $1,805,039.44
Overhead Cost per bag of chips
= $1,805,039.44 / (8.8 X 106)
= $0.205
Standard Unit CostDM per bag = $0.530
DL per bag = $0.0656
Overhead per bag = $0.205
Standard Unit Cost
= DM + DL + OH
= $0.530 + $0.0656 + $0.205
= $0.80
Standard Quantity (SP)
= 8.8 X 106 X 17 X 0.0625
= 9.35 X 106 pounds
Material Usage Variance (MUV) = (AP – SQ)SP
= (9.5 X 106 – 9.35 X 106) (0.245)
= (150000)(0.245)
= $36750 U
4. Suppose that the level of production was 8.8 million bags of potato chips for the year as planned. If 9.5 million pounds of potatoes were used, compute the material usage variance
for potatoes
Qn 7. Supplement QuestionReq 1
• “Rigged” standard costs by setting standards too low, so as to produce favorable variances
oOverstate favorable variances
oUnderstate COGS
oOverstate net operating income
Req 2
• Should not be permitted to continue this practice
• Violates ethical standards of competence, integrity & credibility.
oFinancial reporting regulations forbid carrying variances forward from one year to the next
oWill falsely inflate profits of company. Lack of accountability towards investors
Req 3
• Standards rigged by Preston Lansing, Vice President of Home
Security Division.
• Gary Farber, assistant controller, said that Lansing’s practice
was common knowledge
• President of Merced Home Products aware and claims that the
board of directors was aware too.
Report to the board of directors in case the president was
lying.
Initiate a confidential discussion with an IMA Ethics Counselor
or other impartial advisor to obtain a better understanding of
possible courses of actions