Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Academy Team
Student
Advisor Parents
All Teachers Counselor
Administrators Specialists
INFORMATION DISSEMINATION
Team Leader Meetings
Budget
Team Roles and Responsibilities
Parent Night
Team Presentations
Award Ceremony
Student Conferences
YOUR NOT ALONE
INTERDISCIPLINARY PROJECTS
CURRICULUM COORDINATION
GLINDA:
ARE PEOPLE BORN WICKED? OR DO THEY HAVE
WICKEDNESS THRUST UPON THEM?
After all, she had a father. She had a mother as so many do. . .
Table assignment: Academy Selection, Transfer and Dismissal of Academy Students
Odd = The process for recruitment
Even = The process for withdrawal
Illustrate the process
What is the due process?
Who is involved?
How much responsibility is given to the student?
Student Improvement
Plan (SIP)
Student Assisted Services (SAS)
When to Use?
Student - Teacher
Student-PACE Advisor
Student-Team (Full or Partial)
Limited English Proficiency (LEP)
Special Ed. & 504 Referral
Severe discipline issues
2 + failures in Six Weeks
Low Employability Skills
Student Intervention Process
Outcome
•Student Awareness
•Specific Goals
•Set Boundaries
•Team Plan
•Communication•Special Services Referral (Accommodations, Modifications)
•Secondary Reassignment Center
•Academy probation and withdrawn invitation
Contact: PACE Advisor, Parent, Team Leader, Administrator
Scenario
Step
When Who is involved Who runs it? Documentation
1 Issues in one class student + teacher Teacher Teacher documentation
2 Issues in multiple classes ES grade of less than grade target
student + ? (1 or two teachers, parent, administrator, team, counselor, etc.)
Pace Teacher SIP (e-mail team)
3 Issues in multiple classes Insufficient improvement on SIPSevere discipline issueFailure of two or more classesES grade of less than grade target
student + full team + administrator + parent + necessary specialists (nurse, counselor, etc.)
Team Leader SAS and SIP (e-mail team)
4 Issues in multiple classes Considering 30 day probation periodNo improvement on SIPSevere discipline issueFailure of three or more classesES grade of less than grade target
student + full team + administrator + parent + necessary specialists (nurse, counselor, etc.)
Team Leader SIPParent letter(e-mail team)
STUDENT IMPROVEMENT PROCESS
1:1 Rule-Quality Schools, Dr. William Glasser
Student Intervention Process
Scenario
Student Elphaba is a sophomore on the Medical/Legal Team. As a freshman she failed two core courses (English and History) and had an Employability Grade of 78 for the final average.
Based on the following information, where would your team begin the process on Elphaba?
What questions would you want answered?
What specific recommendations would you make for improvement?
What if the goals are not reached?
Student
Elphaba
1st Six Weeks
2nd Six Weeks
3rd Six Weeks
4th Six Weeks
5th Six Weeks
6th Six Weeks
Grades (SocialStudies, Math, Science, English, Elective, Specialization
SS=90
M=79
Sc=85
En=50
El=83
Sp=95
Employability Skills (T=Time, A=Assignments, P=Professionalism, G= Goals, E=Computer Ethics)
T=3.71
A=3.71
P=3.71
G=4.29
E=3.71
Avg=82
TAKS
E-mails and comments from teachers:
SS = Doing great work especially in groups, turning in all assignments
M = Weak test scores, frequently tardy
Sc = Working well with lab partner. Rarely asks questions
En = Not turning in work, often late, poor attitude, occasionally disturbs others
El = Good effort
Sp = Doing well in class
Student
Elphaba
1st Six Weeks
2nd Six Weeks
3rd Six Weeks
4th Six Weeks
5th Six Weeks
6th Six Weeks
Grades (SocialStudies, Math, Science, English, Elective, Specialization
SS=90
M=79
Sc=85
En=50
El=83
Sp=95
SS=66
M=50
Sc=80
En=50
El=84
Sp=78
Employability Skills (T=Time, A=Assignments, P=Professionalism, G= Goals, E=Computer Ethics)
T=3.71
A=3.71
P=3.71
G=4.29
E=3.71
Avg=82
T=2.86
A=3.29
P=4.0
G=3.86
E=4.0
Avg=79
TEKS Check SS =79
M=64
Sc=78
En=82
E-mails and comments from teachers:
SS = Poor test grades, incomplete work, late
M = Always late, always distracted, sorry student, no work turned in.
Sc = Portion of one lab missing, otherwise good effort
En = Has not been on time once this six weeks. Rough drafts not turned in as required.
El = Good effort
Sp = Not much work accomplished
Student
Elphaba
1st Six Weeks
2nd Six Weeks
3rd Six Weeks
4th Six Weeks
5th Six Weeks
6th Six Weeks
Grades (SocialStudies, Math, Science, English, Elective, Specialization
SS=90
M=79
Sc=85
En=50
El=83
Sp=95
SS=66
M=50
Sc=80
En=50
El=84
Sp=78
SS=63
M=APV
Sc=77
En=64
El=50
Sp=50
Employability Skills (T=Time, A=Assignments, P=Professionalism, G= Goals, E=Computer Ethics)
T=3.71
A=3.71
P=3.71
G=4.29
E=3.71
Avg=82
T=2.86
A=3.29
P=4.0
G=3.86
E=4.0
Avg=79
T=2.57
A=2.71
P=3.29
G=3.14
E=3.29
Avg=70
TEKS Check SS =79
M=64
Sc=78
En=82
SS=82
M=55
Sc=75
En=78
E-mails and comments from teachers:
SS = Poor test grades, missing assignments
M = Frequently late, no attempt to turn in assignments
Sc = Some daily work not turned in on time. Could use tutorial time after school or during lunch.
En = Late frequently, missing one rough draft and two final copies
El = Poor attitude, work not turned in from group
Sp = Seems disinterested. Not working to potential. Several zeroes
Weekly Progress
Student
Elphaba
1st Six Weeks
2nd Six Weeks
3rd Six Weeks
4th Six Weeks
5th Six Weeks
6th Six Weeks
Grades (SocialStudies, Math, Science, English, Elective, Specialization
SS=90
M=79
Sc=85
En=50
El=83
Sp=95
SS=66
M=50
Sc=80
En=50
El=84
Sp=78
SS=63
M=APV
Sc=77
En=64
El=50
Sp=50
SS=83
M=61
Sc=76
En=83
El=50
Sp=70
Employability Skills (T=Time, A=Assignments, P=Professionalism, G= Goals, E=Computer Ethics)
T=3.71
A=3.71
P=3.71
G=4.29
E=3.71
Avg=82
T=2.86
A=3.29
P=4.0
G=3.86
E=4.0
Avg=79
T=2.57
A=2.71
P=3.29
G=3.14
E=3.29
Avg=70
T=2.38
A=2.88
P=3.13
G=3.13
E=3.25
Avg=69
TEKS Check SS =79
M=64
Sc=78
En=82
SS=82
M=55
Sc=75
En=78
SS=85
M=58
Sc=79
En=79
E-mails and comments from teachers:
SS = Group work improved, test scores also improved
M = Minimal effort, late daily
Sc = Four daily assignments not turned in on time
En = Work turned in. Did stay after school for tutorials four times in the six weeks
El = Late frequently, work not turned in.
Sp = Minimal work attempted
Student
Elphaba
1st Six Weeks
2nd Six Weeks
3rd Six Weeks
4th Six Weeks
5th Six Weeks
6th Six Weeks
Grades (SocialStudies, Math, Science, English, Elective, Specialization
SS=90
M=79
Sc=85
En=50
El=83
Sp=95
SS=66
M=50
Sc=80
En=50
El=84
Sp=78
SS=63
M=APV
Sc=77
En=64
El=50
Sp=50
SS=83
M=61
Sc=76
En=83
El=50
Sp=70
SS=87
M=74
Sc=74
En=72
El=58
Sp=78
Employability Skills (T=Time, A=Assignments, P=Professionalism, G= Goals, E=Computer Ethics)
T=3.71
A=3.71
P=3.71
G=4.29
E=3.71
Avg=82
T=2.86
A=3.29
P=4.0
G=3.86
E=4.0
Avg=79
T=2.57
A=2.71
P=3.29
G=3.14
E=3.29
Avg=70
T=2.38
A=2.88
P=3.13
G=3.13
E=3.25
Avg=69
T=3.0
A=3.3
P=3.3
G=3.1
E=3.3
Avg=73
TEKS Check SS =79
M=64
Sc=78
En=82
SS=82
M=55
Sc=75
En=78
SS=85
M=58
Sc=79
En=79
SS=80
M=62
Sc=77
En=81
E-mails and comments from teachers:
SS = Excellent group project, all members participated
M = Improved test scores, still tardy
Sc = Three daily assignments not turned in on time. Lab work good
En = Rough drafts have improved. Two assignments were not turned in on time. Late arrival most days.
El = Assignments not turned in
Sp = Some improvement in work turned in lately
6th Six Weeks
Student Elphaba received passing on the TAKS test
Social Studies
Science
English
Student Elphaba did not pass TAKS Math
Student
Elphaba
1st Six Weeks
2nd Six Weeks
3rd Six Weeks
4th Six Weeks
5th Six Weeks
6th Six Weeks
Grades (SocialStudies, Math, Science, English, Elective, Specialization
SS=90
M=79
Sc=85
En=50
El=83
Sp=95
SS=66
M=50
Sc=80
En=50
El=84
Sp=78
SS=63
M=APV
Sc=77
En=64
El=50
Sp=50
SS=83
M=61
Sc=76
En=83
El=50
Sp=70
SS=87
M=74
Sc=74
En=72
El=58
Sp=78
SS=85
M=78
Sc=78
En=85
El=72
Sp=79
Employability Skills (T=Time, A=Assignments, P=Professionalism, G= Goals, E=Computer Ethics)
T=3.71
A=3.71
P=3.71
G=4.29
E=3.71
Avg=82
T=2.86
A=3.29
P=4.0
G=3.86
E=4.0
Avg=79
T=2.57
A=2.71
P=3.29
G=3.14
E=3.29
Avg=70
T=2.38
A=2.88
P=3.13
G=3.13
E=3.25
Avg=69
T=3.0
A=3.3
P=3.3
G=3.1
E=3.3
Avg=73
T=2.7
A=3.0
P=3.1
G=3.1
E=2.4
Avg=78
TAKS SS =79
M=64
Sc=78
En=82
SS=82
M=55
Sc=75
En=78
SS=85
M=58
Sc=79
En=79
SS=80
M=62
Sc=77
En=81
E-mails and comments from teachers:
SS = Good group effort
M = Test grades improved
Sc = Attending tutorials, two assignments not turned in.
En = Most assignments turned in. Still tardy frequently
El = Some attempt has been made to turn in late work
Sp = Little effort to complete most tasks
Student Probation Process
• Student Team Meeting
• SAS meeting- SIP warning Status
• Student Probation Status
Probation meeting includes student, parent, teachers, counselor, administrator
Student Probation Process
• At minimum, probation letter must be given to student and parent– Consider giving additional copies to PACE
teacher and team leader
• Probation letter must give specific improvement steps that will be measured
• Probation letter must give a specific date when progress will be reviewed
• Deadline for probation placement is end of 5th Six Weeks (30 day min. notification)
Sample Probation Letters
Sample letter #1
Sample letter #2
In order to conduct a successful TEAM/Student Conference remember these expectations:
PURPOSE: To help the student identify the best plan of action for achieving his/her goals (long and short term)
Focus: How can we best help support the student as they attempt to reach their goals?
•Stay on topic•Keep comments brief•No war stories•Limit preaching to Sundays•Excuses are not the same thing as reasons•Keep a sense of humor (especially when getting frustrated)•Give them a way out and not back them into a corner•Close in the box gradually (it will probably take more than one meeting)
•Listen, Listen, Listen to what the student is saying•When its time, focus on solutions to problems; there are always options•Be open to new ideas and be creative with solutions (this is their first time)•Everything said in the meeting is CONFIDENTIAL (beyond anything else, we are trying to build trust)•Your are being watched as an example of what ADULT actions should be
When doctors lose a patient they lose a life;
when preachers lose a member they lose a soul; and
when we lose a student we lose a potential.
