Upload
gabriel-fleming
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Academy Health ARM Academy Health ARM 20082008
Is Regionalization or Is Regionalization or Competition Better for Competition Better for
Patient Welfare?Patient Welfare?Vivian Ho, PhDVivian Ho, PhD
James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy & Dept. of Economics, James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy & Dept. of Economics, Rice UniversityRice University
Dept. of Medicine, Baylor College of MedicineDept. of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine
Marah Short, MAMarah Short, MAJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice UniversityJames A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, Rice University
June 10, 2008June 10, 2008
FundingFunding
National Institute of Health: National Institute of Health: National Cancer Institute grant National Cancer Institute grant entitled Regionalizing Cancer entitled Regionalizing Cancer Surgery (1 R21 CA118452-01A1)Surgery (1 R21 CA118452-01A1)
Research ObjectivesResearch Objectives
To predict the changes in consumer To predict the changes in consumer surplus resulting from regionalizing surplus resulting from regionalizing cancer surgery by referring patients cancer surgery by referring patients to high volume hospitalsto high volume hospitals
Empirical FrameworkEmpirical FrameworkRegionalization
Hospital Procedure Volume
Mkt. Concentration
MortalityCostPrice
Patient Welfare
Study DesignStudy Design
Estimate effect of market concentration on Estimate effect of market concentration on mortality, cost, & pricemortality, cost, & price
Estimate effect of procedure volume on Estimate effect of procedure volume on mortality & costsmortality & costs
Use volume-mortality estimates to assign a Use volume-mortality estimates to assign a value to the lives gained resulting from value to the lives gained resulting from regionalizationregionalization
Use concentration effects to predict Use concentration effects to predict regionalization costsregionalization costs
Use benefits & costs to estimate consumer Use benefits & costs to estimate consumer surplussurplus
DataData
Patients who underwent surgical Patients who underwent surgical resection for pancreatic or colon resection for pancreatic or colon cancer between 2001 & 2005cancer between 2001 & 2005 Hospital discharge abstracts in Florida, Hospital discharge abstracts in Florida,
New Jersey, New York & CaliforniaNew Jersey, New York & California Medstat MarketScan insurance claimsMedstat MarketScan insurance claims AHA annual surveysAHA annual surveys Medicare cost reportsMedicare cost reports
Dependent VariablesDependent Variables
Inpatient MortalityInpatient Mortality CostCost
Charges multiplied by CCRsCharges multiplied by CCRs PricePrice
Payment to hospital for entire Payment to hospital for entire admissionadmission
Patient co-pay & insurance co. paymentPatient co-pay & insurance co. payment
Explanatory Variables: Explanatory Variables: Mortality, Cost, & Price Mortality, Cost, & Price
EquationsEquations Herfindahl IndexHerfindahl Index Hospital Hospital
CharacteristicsCharacteristics Annual procedure Annual procedure
volumevolume OwnershipOwnership TeachingTeaching BedsizeBedsize
Hospital-level FEHospital-level FE Year Year
Patient Patient CharacteristicsCharacteristics Age, Gender, RaceAge, Gender, Race Urgent/EmergentUrgent/Emergent Elixhauser Elixhauser
comorbidity indexcomorbidity index Cancer stageCancer stage Procedure specificProcedure specific LOS (mortality eqn. LOS (mortality eqn.
only)only)
Effect of Market Effect of Market Concentration & Procedure Concentration & Procedure
Volume on MortalityVolume on MortalityPancreaticoduodenePancreaticoduodene
ctomyctomyColectomyColectomy
HerfindahlHerfindahl -2.345-2.345
(0.425)(0.425)4.9544.954******
(0.002)(0.002)
VolumeVolume -0.042-0.042******
(0.000)(0.000)-0.011-0.011******
(0.000)(0.000)
P-values are in parentheses.P-values are in parentheses.
* Statistically significant at 10% level; ** 5% level; *** 1% level. * Statistically significant at 10% level; ** 5% level; *** 1% level.
Effect of Market Effect of Market Concentration & Procedure Concentration & Procedure
Volume on CostsVolume on CostsPancreaticoduodenePancreaticoduodene
ctomyctomyColectomyColectomy
HerfindahlHerfindahl 5.0895.089
(0.370)(0.370)-1.218-1.218
(0.718)(0.718)
VolumeVolume -0.050-0.050**
(0.085)(0.085)-0.001-0.001
(0.895)(0.895)
P-values are in parentheses.P-values are in parentheses.
* Statistically significant at 10% level; ** 5% level; *** 1% level. * Statistically significant at 10% level; ** 5% level; *** 1% level.
Effect of Market Effect of Market Concentration on Concentration on
Log(Price)Log(Price)PancreaticoduodenePancreaticoduodene
ctomyctomyColectomyColectomy
HerfindahlHerfindahl 4.5234.523
(0.342)(0.342)0.7630.763****
(0.041)(0.041)
P-values are in parentheses.P-values are in parentheses.
* Statistically significant at 10% level; ** 5% level; *** 1% level. * Statistically significant at 10% level; ** 5% level; *** 1% level.
Principal ResultsPrincipal ResultsPancreaticoduodenectPancreaticoduodenect
omyomyColectomyColectomy
Higher Higher mkt. mkt. concentraconcentrationtion
MortalityMortality
PricePrice
Higher Higher procedure procedure volumevolume
MortalityMortality
CostsCosts
MortalityMortality
Principal ResultsPrincipal Results
Higher procedure volume is Higher procedure volume is associated with lower mortality for associated with lower mortality for both procedures and lower costs for both procedures and lower costs for pancreaticoduodenectomy.pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Higher concentration is associated Higher concentration is associated with higher mortality and price for with higher mortality and price for colectomy.colectomy.
Next StepsNext Steps
Use volume-mortality estimates to Use volume-mortality estimates to assign a value to the lives gained assign a value to the lives gained resulting from regionalizationresulting from regionalization
Use concentration effects to predict Use concentration effects to predict regionalization costsregionalization costs
Use benefits & costs to estimate Use benefits & costs to estimate consumer surplusconsumer surplus
Policy ImplicationsPolicy Implications
Recommendations to save lives by Recommendations to save lives by concentrating surgery at high-concentrating surgery at high-volume hospital should be tempered volume hospital should be tempered by consumer surplus losses resulting by consumer surplus losses resulting from reductions in hospital market from reductions in hospital market competition. competition.