1
Newsletter - GEO Guardian Employers Organisation ABSENTEEISM AND DESERTION Employers often confuse absenteeism with desertion. If an employee is wrongly charged, this could result in an unfair dismissal. Absenteeism is defined as an employee being absent from work without permission without a valid or acceptable reason. Desertion occurs when an employee is absent from work with the intention of not returning to work. There is no time limit to this. Because of the difficulty of showing this intention, many employers create a rule that if an employee is absent for a specified period (e.g. 5 days) without notifying the employer this is deemed to be a dismissible offence. An employee who is absent without permission for say, six weeks, and then returns to work, should not be charged with desertion but rather with a breach of the company rule: i.e. Being absent without permission from x date to x date without permission and without notifying the company. Most disciplinary codes list the penalty for being absent without permission for 3 or more days as summary dismissal. It is important to remember that when an employee returns to work after being absent, no matter what period, be it 6 days or 6 months, the employer must give the employee an opportunity to explain the reasons for the absence. This should be done at a formal disciplinary enquiry. It could be regarded to be an unfair dismissal if the employee is simply told he has been dismissed without being given an opportunity to explain the reason for his absence at a formal disciplinary enquiry. It is advisable that where possible, the employer should contact the absent employee, preferably in writing (telegram, email, WhatsApp etc.) or by phone or messenger to establish the reasons for the employee’s absence. In this correspondence the employee should be advised that he should return to work immediately and to explain his absence, failing which disciplinary action may be taken against him which could result in dismissal. Should the employee return to work prior to any disciplinary action being taken against him, the employee’s reasons for the absence should be investigated. The employee should be required to produce satisfactory proof of justifiable reasons for his absence. The individual circumstances of the employee must always be considered. Family responsibility leave (i.e. family death, if proven) can be granted retrospectively, as is the case with an illness. The employee will still have to explain why he failed to notify the employer at the commencement of such absence. If an employee is imprisoned for an offence, then the employee's contract could be terminated for inability to report for work (i.e. breach of contract). However recent case law indicates that imprisonment does not automatically imply dismissal. Points to Consider: Did the employee give a satisfactory reason for being absent? Does he have a past tendency to be absent? Does he have dependency/ family/marital problems? Does his family live far away? Did he notify the employer of his absence? Has the employee received counselling in the past for absenteeism? Does the company have a written rule/procedure requiring that an employee must notify the company if absent? If so, then failure to comply could result in action for failing to comply with procedures. Have you employed another person in the place of the absentee? If you need to replace the absentee as soon as possible because of operational requirements, it is advisable to first employ the replacement on a temporary basis. If the employer employs a replacement immediately on a permanent basis before dismissing the absent employee, the absentee could argue that his dismissal was a fait accompli. The employee could claim that the employer’s actions in employing a permanent replacement before hearing his explanation, clearly indicated that the employer had pre-judged the case. Absenteeism through imprisonment Imprisonment essentially results in the employee being in breach of his contract of employment. This is because the employee is unable to provide labour to the employer. An employer does not have to keep a position open indefinitely but should handle each case on its own merits. For example, if a person has been incarcerated over the weekend for a domestic issue and is released on the following Tuesday, it would probably not be fair to dismiss the employee for such a short period of absence. If, however, the employee holds a critical position at the company and is incarcerated for a month or two, it may very well justify the employee’s termination. It is preferable to hold a hearing once the employee has been released. It is important to deal with the employee’s absenteeism and to rather terminate for the employee's inability to return to work (or unacceptable period of absence), rather than for the criminal conviction. When an employee is released from jail, or is on bail, he should report for work and make his services available. Failure to do so could amount to desertion. Can an employee be disciplined and have pay deducted for absenteeism? Yes, both are permitted. The principle of “no work no pay” is accepted if services are not provided. Discipline is in response for breach of the rule not to be absent. Can the employer replace the absent employee with another worker? If the employee returns, he could argue that the employer was biased in that he automatically assumed that the employee's absenteeism was unjustified. However, the employer might be justified in employing a replacement for operational requirements. It is advisable to employ a person on a temporary or fixed-term contract until the true reason for the absenteeism of the employee has been determined. Should any questions arise from the above or further advice be required, kindly contact the author of the above, Andre Rabe (Chairperson GEO 082 491 0708) for further assistance. Regards Andre Rabe Although the POPI Act was signed into law a few years ago, it has taken some time for the Information Regulator to be appointed and for the POPI regulations to be published. These were published in the Government Gazette on 14th December 2018 42110, RG 10897, GN 1383. Section 114 (1) of the Act states that: "All processing of personal information must within one year after the commencement of this section be made to conform to this Act". Essentially, this means that all businesses must be compliant by the end of 2019. Responsible persons* that fail to comply with the POPI Act stand to be fined up to R10 000 000 or face 10 years in prison. A “responsible person” means a public or private body or any other person which, alone or in conjunction with others, determines the purpose of and means for processing personal information. Ultimately the person held responsible will be the Managing Director or CEO of the errant company. The GEO has spent the better of 2018 designing a POPI implementation process and is ready to provide this to members that are not POPI compliant. 0861 436 436 27-02-2020 Contact us: Telephone: 0861 436 436 Email: [email protected] In This Issue Employers must proceed with caution when dealing with cases of absenteeism or desertion. To avoid the possibility of being taken to the CCMA, it is advisable to seek advise from GEO. ___________________ GEO members are advised to subscribe to the CIRIS internet labour law advice site. It provides valuable information on all matters related to Labour Law. Contact Andre Rabe on 0824910708 or email him on [email protected] ___________________ Visit our site: www.geo.org.za CIRIS website: www.cirisonline.net E-LEARNING INITIATING DISCIPLINARY HEARINGS The benefits of this online course are: -Cost effective no venue, food or travelling costs; -Learner paced delegates work through the material at their own speed; -No work disruption delegates at work; -Convenient delegates can pause or continue the course at any stage; -Multiple devices the course can be paused and continued on other devices e.g. home PC or smart phone; -Content can be downloaded; -Content can be customised; -Learner progress is monitored and reports provided. To see a demo of the course select the following link: E-Course Initiating Disciplinary Hearings - Power Point To access the course contact Andre Rabe on 082 491 0708 or email: [email protected] We have designed an E- Learning course covering how to initiate professional disciplinary hearings. The online course is designed for any manager or supervisor that may be required to act as an initiator in disciplinary hearings.

ABSENTEEISM AND DESERTION

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    16

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ABSENTEEISM AND DESERTION

Havingtroublereadingthisemail? Viewitinyourbrowser

Newsletter-GEOGuardianEmployersOrganisation

ABSENTEEISMANDDESERTIONEmployersoftenconfuseabsenteeismwithdesertion.Ifanemployeeiswronglycharged,thiscouldresultinanunfair

dismissal.

Absenteeismisdefinedasanemployeebeingabsentfromworkwithoutpermissionwithoutavalidoracceptablereason.

Desertionoccurswhenanemployeeisabsentfromworkwiththeintentionofnotreturningtowork.Thereisnotimelimittothis.Becauseofthedifficultyofshowingthisintention,manyemployerscreatearulethatifanemployeeisabsentforaspecifiedperiod(e.g.5days)withoutnotifyingtheemployerthisisdeemedtobeadismissibleoffence.

Anemployeewhoisabsentwithoutpermissionforsay,sixweeks,andthenreturnstowork,shouldnotbechargedwithdesertionbutratherwithabreachofthecompanyrule:i.e.Beingabsentwithoutpermissionfromxdatetoxdatewithoutpermissionandwithoutnotifyingthecompany.

Mostdisciplinarycodeslistthepenaltyforbeingabsentwithoutpermissionfor3ormoredaysassummarydismissal.

Itisimportanttorememberthatwhenanemployeereturnstoworkafterbeingabsent,nomatterwhatperiod,beit6daysor6months,theemployermustgivetheemployeeanopportunitytoexplainthereasonsfortheabsence.Thisshouldbedoneataformaldisciplinaryenquiry.

Itcouldberegardedtobeanunfairdismissaliftheemployeeissimplytoldhehasbeendismissedwithoutbeinggivenanopportunitytoexplainthereasonforhisabsenceataformaldisciplinaryenquiry.

Itisadvisablethatwherepossible,theemployershouldcontacttheabsentemployee,preferablyinwriting(telegram,email,WhatsAppetc.)orbyphoneormessengertoestablishthereasonsfortheemployee’sabsence.

Inthiscorrespondencetheemployeeshouldbeadvisedthatheshouldreturntoworkimmediatelyandtoexplainhisabsence,failingwhichdisciplinaryactionmaybetakenagainsthimwhichcouldresultindismissal.

Shouldtheemployeereturntoworkpriortoanydisciplinaryactionbeingtakenagainsthim,theemployee’sreasonsfortheabsenceshouldbeinvestigated.Theemployeeshouldberequiredtoproducesatisfactoryproofofjustifiablereasonsforhisabsence.Theindividualcircumstancesoftheemployeemustalwaysbeconsidered.

Familyresponsibilityleave(i.e.familydeath,ifproven)canbegrantedretrospectively,asisthecasewithanillness.Theemployeewillstillhavetoexplainwhyhefailedtonotifytheemployeratthecommencementofsuchabsence.

Ifanemployeeisimprisonedforanoffence,thentheemployee'scontractcouldbeterminatedforinabilitytoreportforwork(i.e.breachofcontract).Howeverrecentcaselawindicatesthatimprisonmentdoesnotautomaticallyimplydismissal.

PointstoConsider:

Did the employee give a satisfactory reason for beingabsent?Doeshehaveapasttendencytobeabsent?Doeshehavedependency/family/maritalproblems?Doeshisfamilylivefaraway?Didhenotifytheemployerofhisabsence?Has the employee received counselling in the past forabsenteeism?Does thecompanyhaveawritten rule/procedure requiringthatanemployeemustnotifythecompanyifabsent?

Ifso,thenfailuretocomplycouldresultinactionforfailingtocomplywithprocedures.

Have you employed another person in theplaceoftheabsentee?

Ifyouneedtoreplacetheabsenteeassoonaspossiblebecauseofoperational requirements, it is advisable to first employ thereplacement on a temporary basis. If the employer employs areplacement immediatelyonapermanentbasisbeforedismissingtheabsentemployee, theabsenteecouldargue thathisdismissalwasafaitaccompli.Theemployeecouldclaimthattheemployer’sactions inemployingapermanent replacementbeforehearinghisexplanation,clearlyindicatedthattheemployerhadpre-judgedthecase.

AbsenteeismthroughimprisonmentImprisonmentessentiallyresultsintheemployeebeinginbreachofhiscontractofemployment.Thisisbecausetheemployeeisunableto provide labour to the employer. An employer does not have tokeepapositionopenindefinitelybutshouldhandleeachcaseonitsownmerits.

Forexample, ifapersonhasbeenincarceratedovertheweekendfor a domestic issue and is released on the following Tuesday, itwouldprobablynotbefairtodismisstheemployeeforsuchashortperiodofabsence.

If,however, theemployeeholdsacriticalpositionat thecompanyand is incarcerated foramonthor two, itmayverywell justify theemployee’stermination.

It is preferable to hold a hearing once the employee has beenreleased. It is important to deal with the employee’s absenteeismandtoratherterminatefortheemployee'sinabilitytoreturntowork(or unacceptable period of absence), rather than for the criminalconviction.

When an employee is released from jail, or is on bail, he shouldreport for work andmake his services available. Failure to do socouldamounttodesertion.

Can an employee be disciplined and havepaydeductedforabsenteeism?

Yes, both are permitted. The principle of “no work no pay” isaccepted ifservicesarenotprovided.Discipline is inresponseforbreachoftherulenottobeabsent.

Can the employer replace the absentemployeewithanotherworker?

If the employee returns, he could argue that the employer wasbiased in that he automatically assumed that the employee'sabsenteeismwasunjustified.

However, the employer might be justified in employing areplacementforoperationalrequirements.Itisadvisabletoemployapersononatemporaryorfixed-termcontractuntilthetruereasonfortheabsenteeismoftheemployeehasbeendetermined.

Should any questions arise from the above or further advice berequired, kindly contact the author of the above, Andre Rabe(ChairpersonGEO0824910708)forfurtherassistance.

RegardsAndreRabe

Although thePOPIActwas signed into lawa few years ago, it has takensome time for the InformationRegulator tobeappointedand for thePOPIregulations to be published. These were published in the GovernmentGazetteon14thDecember201842110,RG10897,GN1383.

Section114(1)oftheActstatesthat:

"All processing of personal information must within one year after thecommencementofthissectionbemadetoconformtothisAct".

Essentially,thismeansthatallbusinessesmustbecompliantbytheendof2019.Responsiblepersons*thatfailtocomplywiththePOPIActstandtobefineduptoR10000000orface10yearsinprison.

A“responsibleperson”meansapublicorprivatebodyoranyotherpersonwhich, alone or in conjunctionwith others, determines the purpose of andmeans for processing personal information. Ultimately the person heldresponsiblewillbetheManagingDirectororCEOoftheerrantcompany.

The GEO has spent the better of 2018 designing a POPI implementationprocess and is ready to provide this to members that are not POPIcompliant.

0861436436

27-02-2020

Contactus:Telephone:0861436436Email:[email protected]

InThisIssue

Employersmustproceedwithcautionwhendealingwithcasesofabsenteeismordesertion.ToavoidthepossibilityofbeingtakentotheCCMA,itisadvisabletoseekadvisefromGEO.

___________________GEOmembersareadvisedto subscribe to the CIRISinternet labour law advicesite. It provides valuableinformation on all mattersrelated to Labour Law.Contact Andre Rabe on0824910708 or email [email protected]

___________________

Visitoursite:

www.geo.org.za

CIRISwebsite:www.cirisonline.net

E-LEARNING –INITIATINGDISCIPLINARYHEARINGSThebenefitsofthisonlinecourseare:

-Costeffective

novenue,foodortravellingcosts;

-Learnerpaced

delegatesworkthroughthematerialattheirownspeed;

-Noworkdisruption

delegatesatwork;

-Convenient

delegatescanpauseorcontinuethecourseatanystage;-Multipledevices

thecoursecanbepausedandcontinuedonotherdevicese.g.homePCorsmartphone;

-Contentcanbedownloaded;

-Contentcanbecustomised;

-Learnerprogressismonitoredandreportsprovided.Toseeademoofthecourseselectthefollowinglink:E-CourseInitiatingDisciplinaryHearings-PowerPoint

ToaccessthecoursecontactAndreRabeon0824910708oremail:[email protected]

WehavedesignedanE-Learningcoursecoveringhowtoinitiateprofessionaldisciplinaryhearings.Theonlinecourseisdesignedforanymanagerorsupervisorthatmayberequiredtoactasaninitiatorindisciplinaryhearings.