Upload
vishal-malusare
View
1.201
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ABRASION AND POLISHING AGENTS
I. INTRODUCTION
The finishing and polishing of restorative dental materials are important
steps in the fabrication of clinically successful restorations. The techniques
employed for these procedures are meant not only for removal of excess material
but also to smoothen rough surfaces.
The finishing of dental restorations prior to their placement in the oral
cavity has therefore three benefits viz.
A) To promote oral hygiene – by resisting the accumulation of food debris and
pathogenic bacteria.
B) Enhance oral function – a well polished surface aids in gliding movement of
the feed over occlusal surfaces and between embrassure spaces (smooth
restoration contacts minimise wear rates on opposing and adjacent teeth. E.g.
materials like ceramics which contain phases harder than the teeth enamel
and dentine).
C) To improve esthetics.
The materials employed for finishing and polishing of dental restorations
are generally termed as Abrasives. Thus an understanding of the characteristics /
features with their properties of these materials and the process of abrasion
would aid in improved clinical usage of these materials and techniques.
1
II. INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Abrasion
Craig has defined abrasion as :
“A process of wear whereby a hard rough surface (like a sand paper disk)
or hard irregular shaped particles (like those in a abrasive slurry) plough grooves
in a softer material and cause materials from these grooves to be removed from
the surface”.
It has been stated by Skinner’s that abrasive wear could be a “two body”
or a “three body” process.
To understand this more specifically the terms viz. Wear, Abrasive wear
and Erosive wear need more understanding.
I) Wear – is a material removal process that can occur whenever surfaces slide
against each other. In dentistry the outermost particle or the surface material
of an abrading instrument is referred to as Abrasive. The material being
finished is termed as a SUBSTRATE.
II) Abrasive wear : This could be of two types :
i. Two body wear – occurs when abrasive particles are firmly bonded to the
surface of the abrasive instrument and no other and abrasive particles are
used eg, a diamond bur abrading a teeth.
ii. Three body wear – when the abrasive particles are free to translate and
rotate between two surfaces Eg, dental prophylaxis pastes (between tooth
and rubber cup).
2
iii. Erosive wear – This is caused by hard particles impacting a substrate
surface, carried by either a stream of air or a stream of liquid. Erosive
wear should be differentiated from chemical erosion more commonly
known as acid etching which involves acid and alkalis instead of the hand
particles to remove the substrate material.
Chemical erosion is employed to prepare teeth surfaces for bonding
purposes and not for finishing of materials.
DESIRABLE CHARACTERISTICS OF AN ABRASIVE
1. It should be irregular in shape so that it presents a sharp edge. (- Jagged
particles are more effective. Round sand particles and cubicle particles of
sand paper are poor abrasives).
2. It should be harder than the work it abrades. If it cannot indent the surface to
be abraded then it cannot cut it and therefore wears out.
3. Abrasive should posses a high impact strength or body strength. Abrasive
point should always fracture than dull out so that always, a sharp point or
edge is available. The cuts also helps in shredding debris accumulated from
work for eg, a grinding wheel against a metal.
4. Abrasive should posses attrition resistance so that it does not wear.
3
DESIGN OF ABRASIVE INSTRUMENTS
The abrasives employed could be one of the three types, viz:
A. Abrasive Grits.
B. Bonded Abrasives.
C. Coated Abrasive Disks and Strips.
A. Abrasive Grits
Abrasive grits are derived from (abrasive) materials that have been
crushed and passed through series of mesh screens to obtain different particle
size ranges. The grits are classified as – COARSE, MEDIUM COARSE,
MEDIUM FINE and SUPER FINE according to the particle size ranges.
B. Bonded Abrasives
These consists of abrasive particles incorporated through a binder to form
grinding tools.
The abrasive particles are bonded by 4 general methods :
1. Sintering.
2. Vitreous bonding (Glass/Ceramic).
3. Resin bonding (usually phenolic resin.
4. Rubber bonding (usually silicone rubber).
1. Sintering – Sintered abrasives are the strongest variety since the abrasive
particles are fused together.
4
2. Vitreous Bonded – Are mixed with a glassy or ceramic matrix material, cold
pressed to the instrument shape and fired to fuse with the binder.
3. Resin Bonded – are cold or hot pressed and then heated to cure the resin.
4. Rubber Bonded – made in a manner which is similar to resin bonded.
As far as bonded abrasives are concerned the type of bonding employed
affects greatly the grinding behaviour of the tool on the substrate. Bonded
abrasives that tend to disintegrate rapidly on the substrate are weak and result in
increased abrasive costs. Bonded abrasives that disintegrate very slowly tend to
clog with the grinding debris and result in loss of abrasive efficiency.
Thus an ideal binder is one which would hold the abrasive to the
instrument sufficiently long as to cut, grind or polish the substrate, yet release
the particle before its cutting efficiency is lost or before heat build up causes
thermal damage to the substrate.
The type of binder is also intimately related to the life of the tool in use.
In most cases the binder is impregnated throughout within an abrasive so that as
an abrasive particle is wrenched during use another abrasive particle takes its
place as the binder wears e.g. for diamond rotary instrument electroplated with a
nickel base matrix is used as a binder.
The heat generated during abrasive activity is dependent on the efficiency
of the abrasives. Cooling however may be required for e.g. in abrading
polymeric materials, excessive heat should be avoided as it can cause stress
relief and warpage (E.C. Combe).
It is important that a bonded abrasive should always be TRUED and
DRESSED before its use.
5
Truing –procedure where bonded abrasive is first run against a harder abrasive
block until it rotates in the handpieces without eccentricity or run out when
placed on the substrate. Therefore TRUING is done for proper shaping of the
bonded abrasive.
Dressing – like Truing is done for proper shape of the abrasive and also for two
different purposes.
1. Dressing procedure reduces the instrument to its correct working size
and shape.
2. Used to remove clogged debris (ABRASIVE BLINDING) from the
abrasive instrument to restore working efficiency.
C. Coated Abrasive Disks and Strips
These abrasives are supplied as disks and finishing strips. They are
fabricated by securing abrasive particles to a flexible backing material (heavy
weight paper or Mylar).
The disks are available in different diameters with thin and very thin
backings. Moisture – resistant backings are advantageous as the abrasive
stiffness is not reduced by water degradation.
ABRASIVE ACTION
The mode of action of the abrasives is similar to that of the dental burs
that is it is merely a cutting action. Each fine abrasive particle thus presents as a
sharp edge which cuts through the surface similar to a pointed chisel. During this
cutting process the shaving thus formed is powdered and usually clogs the
abrasive which thus makes periodic cleaning of the abrasive necessary.
6
Abrasive Action On Metals
On abrading metallic restorations, the metallic grain structure usually gets
disoriented. The more the abrasion the greater is the associated disorientation.
Strain hardening of the abraded metal usually accompanies the grain
disorientation. (Strain hardening is a process wherein the metal becomes
stronger, harder and less ductile when greater stresses are induced at the grain
boundaries to provide slipping of the lattice network).
In the abrading of metals, the crystalline structure of the surface is
disturbed, sometimes to a depth of 10m. However this surface affect varies
with different metals for eg: in ductile metals (like gold) less of the surface metal
may be removed by the abrasive than in a brittle metal.
Abrasive Action on Resins
The surface disturbance produced by abrasion on resins however leads to
the creation of surface stresses that may cause distortion if the abrasion is too
rigorous. The heat generated during this abrasion partially relieves the stresses.
If this heat generated is excessive it may even relieve stresses created
during processing which leads to warpage of the resin along with melting of the
surface of the resin. The heat generated is directly proportional to the efficiency
of the abrasives.
FACTORS AFFECTING RATE OF ABRASION
Rate of abrasion of a given material by a given abrasive is determined primarily by
three factors:
1. Size of the abrasive particle – larger the size – greater the abrasion.
7
2. Pressure of the work against the abrasive when work is pressed against
the abrasive scratches are deeper and abrasion is more rapid – so
greater chances of the abrasives to fracture.
3. Speed at which the abrasive particles travels across the work. Greater
the speed, greater would be the rate of abrasion.
Speed employed is of two types:
- Rotational speed.
- Linear speed speed with which particles pass over the work.
Linear speed required is 5000ft/min.
Linear speed is related to rotational speed as follows:
V = d n where V = Linear speed
d = diameter of the abrasive
n = revolutions per minute
FACTORS INFLUENCING EFFICIENCY OF THE ABRASIVES
These factors are as follows:
1. The hardness of the abrasive particle (diamond is hardest, pumice and garnet
etc., are relatively mild).
2. The Shape of the abrasive particle (particles with sharp edge are more
effective).
3. Particle size of the abrasive (Longer particle size will cut deeper grooves).
4. Mechanical properties of the abrasive (If the material breaks, it should form a
new cutting edge. Therefore brittleness can be an advantage).
8
5. Rate of movement of the abrasive particles (slower abrasion – deeper
scratches).
6. Pressure applied to the abrasive (too much pressure can fracture the abrasive
instrument and increase heat of friction that has evolved).
7. Properties of material that is being abraded. (A brittle material can be rapidly
abraded whereas ductile / malleable metal like pure gold will flow instead of
being removed by the abrasive).
TYPES OF ABRASIVES
I. According to Craig : The abrasives used can be classified grouped as
and :
A. Finishing Abrasives.
B. Polishing Abrasives.
C. Cleaning Abrasives.
A. Finishing Abrasives
These are hard, coarse abrasives used initially to develop desired contours
and remove off gross irregularities.
B. Polishing Abrasives
These have a smaller particle size and are less hard than abrasives used
for finishing. They are used for smoothening surfaces that are typically
roughened by finishing abrasives.
9
A. Cleansing Abrasives
These are soft abrasives with small particle size and are intended to
remove softer materials that adhere to enamel or a restoration.
These dental abrasives could be employed in the form of 3 basic designs
as mentioned previously.
Secondly Skinner’s has grouped the abrasives employed in dentistry as
follows:
A. Natural Abrasives.
B. Manufactured Abrasives.
A. Natural Abrasives B. Manufactured Abrasives
1. Arkansas Stone
2. Chalk
3. Corundum
4. Diamond
5. Emery
6. Garnet
7. Pumice
8. Quartz
9. Sand
10. Tripoli
11. Zirconium silicate
12. Cuttle
13. Kleselguhr
Are generally preferred because of their more predictable physical properties.
1. Silicon carbide
2. Aluminium oxide
3. Synthetic diamond
4. Rouge
5. Tin oxide
10
Under Natural Abrasives we have:
1. Arkansas stone
- Semitranslucent, light gray, siliceous sedimentary rock, mined in
Arkansas.
- It contains microcrystalline quartz.
- Small pieces of this mineral is attached to metal shanks and trued to
various shapes for fine grinding of tooth enamel and metal alloys.
2. Chalk
- Mineral form of calcite.
- Contains calcium carbonate.
- Used as mild abrasive paste to polish teeth enamel, gold foil, amalgam
and plastic materials.
3. Corundum – is largely replaced by – Aluminium oxide due to its superior
physical properties.
- However corundum is primarily used for grinding metal alloys and is
available as a bonded abrasive.
4. Diamond is a transparent colourless mineral composed of carbon called super
abrasive because of its ability to abrade any other known substance.
- It is the hardest substance known.
- Used on ceramic and resin based composite materials.
11
Supplied as:
a. Bonded abrasive rotary instrument.
b. Flexible metal backed abrasive strips.
c. Diamond polishing pastes.
5. Emery
- This abrasive is a grayish black corundum that is prepared in a fine grain
form.
- Supplied predominantly as coated abrasive disks.
- Used for finishing metal alloys or plastic materials.
6. Garnet – the term garnet includes several minerals which possess similar
physical properties like Silicates of Al, Co, Fe, Mg and Mn.
- Garnet is dark red, extremely hard and when fractured during abrasive
activity forms sharp chisel shaped plates – therefore making Garnet an
effective abrasive.
- Garnet is available on coated disks and Arbor box.
- Used in grinding metal alloys and plastic materials.
7. Pumice
- Is produced from volcanic activity.
- Flour of pumice is an extremely fine grinded volcanic rock derivative
from Italy.
12
- Used in polishing teeth enamel, gold foil, dental amalgam and acrylic
resins.
8. Quartz - the particles are pulverized to form sharp angular particles which
are useful in making coated disks.
- Used to finish metal alloys and may be used to grind dental enamel.
9. Sand
- Is a mixture of small mineral particles predominantly silica.
- Particles have rounded to angular shape.
- Used to remove refractory investment material from base metal castings.
- It is coated on paper disks for grinding of metal alloys and plastic
materials.
10. Tripoli
- Derived from a lightweight, siliceous sedimentary rock
- Could be white, gray, pink, red or yellow.
- Gray and red are most frequently used.
- Used for polishing metal alloys and some plastic materials.
11. Zirconium silicate
- Off white mineral, ground to various sizes used to make coated disks and
strips.
- Also used as a component of dental prophylaxis pastes.
13
12. Cuttle
– Made from the pulverized internal shell of a Mediterranean marine
mollusk, this abrasive is obtained as a white calcareous powder.
– The related synonyms of this abrasive are cuttle fish and cuttle bone.
– It is obtained as a coated abrasive and used for delicate operations like
polishing of metal margins and dental amalgam restorations.
13. Kleselguhr
- This abrasive is obtained from the silaceous remains of minute aquatic
plants known as diatoms.
- It is an excellent mild abrasive.
- The coarser variety is known as DIATOMACEOUS EARTH used as a
filler for dental materials such as hydrocolloid impression materials.
- Appropriate precautions must be taken while handling this abrasive as
there is risk of respiratory silicosis due to long term exposure of this
material is significant.
Manufactured Abrasives
1. Silicon Carbide
- This is the first of the synthetic abrasive to be developed.
- Two types were manufactured i.e. 1. green form and 2. Blue black
form. Both are having similar physical properties.
- However, the green variety is preferred because substrates are more
visible against the green colour.
14
- The cutting efficiency of silicon carbide abrasives is higher as the
particles are sharp and break to form new sharp particles.
- Supplied as air abrasive in coated disks and vitreous and rubber
bonded instruments. The silicon carbide is
- Used in cutting metal alloys, ceramics and plastic materials.
2. Aluminium Oxide
- This is the second synthetic abrasive to be manufactured.
- This form of alumina is much harder than its natural counterpart
(CORUNDUM) because of its purity.
- The forms usually prepared are:
i. White stones – made of sintered aluminium oxide are used for
contouring of enamel and finishing metal and ceramic materials.
ii. Variations of aluminium oxide include those with chromium
compound additions these obtained in pink and ruby colours are
obtained as vitreous bonded non-contaminating mounted stones –
used for preparation of metal ceramic alloys to receive porcelain.
(Important to note that remnants of these abrasives should not
interfere with porcelain bonding to the metal studies by Yamamoto
1987. Therefore show that carbides are better for this purpose).
3. Synthetic diamond – developed in 1955.
- Synthetic or manufactured form of diamond is produced at 5 times the
level of the natural diamond abrasive.
15
- This synthetic diamond is used for the manufacture of diamond saws,
wheels and burs and also diamond locks employed for truing of
bonded abrasives.
- Synthetic diamond abrasives are used primarily on tooth structure,
ceramic materials and resin based components.
4. Rouge
- Principle component is iron oxide blended with various binders.
- Used to polish high noble metal alloys.
- May be impregnated in paper or fabric known as CROCUS CLOTH.
5. Tin Oxide
- Is composed of very fine abrasive particles.
- May be employed in an abrasive paste form along with water, alcohol
or glycerine.
- Used as a polishing agent for teeth and metallic restorations.
POLISHING
“Polishing is the production of a smooth mirror like surface without use
of any external form”.
A number of reasons are elucidated for the importance of polishing dental
restorations and teeth these are:
16
i. The smooth polished restorative and teeth (enamel) surfaces are
less receptive to bacterial colonization and dental plaque
formation.
ii. Secondary, the polished layer on metallic restoration aids in the
prevention of tarnish and corrosion.
iii. Finally, from the clinical view point unpolished restoration with
rough surfaces are uncomfortable for the patient.
The polishing procedure is one which is eventually initiated once the
abrasive mechanism eliminates or obliterates most of the fine scratches leaving a
smooth finish. The smooth layer or smooth finish on the surface of the
restoration is referred to by Skinner’s as a polish.
However it is difficult to draw or markout exact line of differentiation
between an abrasive and a polishing agent. For example, given agent which has
a large particle size and that which produces deep or large scratches on the
restoration surface could be termed as an abrasive. On the other hand a similar
agent with a fine particle size which produces a smooth finish could be termed as
a polishing agent. The polishing materials also differ in the amount of material
they remove from the surface. They remove molecule by molecule and thus
provided smooth surface. In the process fine scratches and irregularities are
filled in by powdered particulate being removed from the surface. The polished
layer is therefore thought of as one made up minute crystals, thus known as the
micro-crystalline layer of Beilby layer (named after a scientist who first noted
such a surface layer after polishing which is easily kept clean and has a high
corrosion resistance. Surface structure not more than 0.005 mm is removed
during polishing. It is therefore observed that the process of finishing, cutting /
abrading and polishing have not been differentiated well in dentistry.
17
The term finish would actually relate to the final surface achieved /
applied to a material or the final character of the surface of the material.
If this explanation for the term finish is accepted then others viz. cutting /
abrading, grinding and polishing would be considered as a series of steps
encompassed within the process of finishing.
However minor differences exist in the cutting, grinding and polishing
procedures.
1. A cutting operation-as cited by Skinner’s “refers to the use of a bladed
instrument or any instrument in a blade like fashion”. The substrate of the
cutting operation be divided into large separate pieces or may sustain
deep notches and grooves by the cutting operation.
2. A grinding operation removes small particles of a substrate through the
action of bonded or coated abrasive instruments. The grinding
instruments may contain randomly arranged abrasive particles eg: a
diamond coated rotary instrument.
It is important to note here the cutting and grinding are both
Unidirectional in their course of action.
3. The polishing operation is one of the most refined finishing process. It
produces scratches so fine that they are visible only when greatly
magnified. The ideally polished surface is one which would be
automatically smooth with no surface imperfections.
18
Polishing is considered to be Multi Directional in its course of action.
Eg: of polishing instruments are :
a. Rubber abrasive points.
b. Fine particle disks and strips.
c. Fine particle polishing pastes – applied with soft felt points, muslin
wheels, prophy cups or buffing wheels.
d. Electrolytic polymers (Co – Cr – Alloys).
- is a reverse of electroplating.
- Alloy to be polished is made the anode of the electrolytic cell.
- As current passes ionic material from anode is dissolved
leaving a bright surface.
- Excellent method for Co-Cr alloys used in denture bases.
Polishing Procedure (for resins) The steps involved are:
i. Smoothen the work with a coarse abrasive to produce large scratches.
ii. Remove large scratches with a finer abrasive but difference in fineness
should not be too great as it causes streaking in the final surface. Keep
changing direction of the abrasion so that new scratches appears at right
angles to the coarser, scratches, to ensure uniform abrasion.
iii. Continue using the fine abrasive until scratches are no longer visible to
the eye then accomplish:
19
Primary polishing with pumice flour with a canvas buff wheel (mainly
for resins).
Then the work is cleaned to remove all abrasive particles and then
pumice and water paste of a muddy consistency is applied and buffing
done till a bright and well polished surface is obtained. Glycerine is
preferred instead of H2O because water could evaporate, glycerine
maintains consistency.
Clean the work with soap water and change to a lannel (rotate at high
speed) buff wheel. Polishing cake with grease is held against buff wheel
to impregnate with the agent.
Apply light pressure to avoid excessive heat generation. Care should be
taken to avoid use of abrasive tool or slurry in a dry condition which
would reduce efficiency of abrasive and also increased heat.
Speed employed for Polishing:
- is more than that for abrasion.
- Linear speed of range 7500-10000 ft/min.
20
HAZARDS ENCOUNTERED IN THE FINISHING AND
POLISHING PROCEDURES
Aerosol Hazard:
Aerosols, the dispersion of solid and liquid particles in air are generated
whenever finishing and polishing operations are performed.
The dental aerosols contain teeth structure, dental materials and
microorganisms.
These aerosols are potential sources of infections and chronic diseases of
the eyes and lungs.
Silicosis or grinder’s disease is a major aerosol hazard in dentistry
because of a number of silica based materials are used in processing and
finishing dental restorations.
These aerosols can remain for more than 24 hours before settling and are
therefore capable of cross contamination other zones of the treatment facility.
Aerosols produced during the finishing procedures can be controlled by 3
ways:
1 * Controlled at the source through
a. Adequate infection control procedures.
b. Water spray.
c. High volume suction.
2 * Personal protection
21
a. Safety glasses.
b. Disposable face masks.
3 * Adequate ventilation of the entire unit which efficiently removes any residual
particulates from the air.
FINISHING AND POLISHING OF COMMONLY EMPLOYED
RESTORATIVES
1. Amalgam
- After initial carving, restoration is left undistributed for an appropriate
period (usually one day to obtain maximum strength) before finishing
and polishing is initiated.
- Polishing is done through the sequential use of finishing fine stone
and disks or strips.
- Final polish is done by the application of extra fine silen; followed by
a thin slurry of tin oxide with a rotating soft brush.
- During final polishing restoration should be kept moist to avoid
overheating.
2. Composites:
- The smoothest surface on a freshly inserted composite can be obtained by
allowing polymerization to occur against an inserted Mylar matrix.
- Use of green/carbide stones 12 - blade carbide burs is also accepted for
removal of excess near enamel margins of macro filled resins.
22
- This is followed by use of:
- Aluminium oxide disks – for accessible areas finishing.
- White source stones of suitable shapes – inaccessible areas.
- Fine and micro fine diamonds – finishing of micro filled resins.
23
Component Materials Purpose
Abrasive Calcium carbonate
Dibasic calcium phosphate
dihydrate
Hydrated alumina
Hydrated silica
Sodium bicarbonate
Mixtures of listed abrasives
Removal of Plaque / stain,
polish tooth surface
Detergent Sodium lauryl sulfate Aids debris removal
Coolants Food colorants Appearance
Flavoring Oils of spearmint, peppermint,
wintergreen or cinnamon
Flavor
Humecant Sorbitol, glycerine Maintains moisture content
Water Deionized water Suspension agent
Binder Carrageenan Thickener, prevents liquid-
solid separation
Fluoride Sodium
monofluorophoshpate, sodium
fluoride, stannous fluoride
Dental caries prevention
Tartar control
agents
Disodium pyrophosphate,
tetrasodium pyrophosphate,
tetrapotassium pyrophosphate
Inhibits the formation of
calculus above the gingival
margin.
Desensitization
agents
Potassium nitrate, strontium
chloride
Promotes occlusion of
dentinal tubules
24
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Rotary instrument finishing of micro filled and small particle composite
resins”. JADA. Aug 1987.
- This study suggests that rotary instrument for finishing composites must
be selected in accordance with the type of composites used.
- Tungsten Carbide Burs at high speeds for trimming and finishing
microfilled composites are contraindicated because they disrupt, the
composite resin surface therefore for microfilled and small particle resins
diamond burs at slow speeds are used.
- Carbide burs at high speeds on small particle composites produces a
surface free from the characteristic striations and grooves produced by
diamond burs.
“Effect of three finishing systems on four aesthetic restorative materials”.
Operative Dentistry – 1998.
Two varieties of composites (Hybrid and Microfilled) and two types of
GIC viz, Traditional / conventional GIC and a Resin modified GIC were
employed for this study.
- Impregnated disks and diamond and carbide burs were used.
- No difference was seen in the surface of any of the restorations. When the
mylar matrix were used.
25
- However the study concluded with the result that abrasive impregnated
disks and aluminium oxide disks provided smoother finished surfaces on
the GIC and composite than did the diamond and carbide finishing burs.
A quantitative study of finishing and polishing techniques for a
composite”. Journal of Prosthetic Dent. 1988.
As we know, finishing and polishing of composite has always been a
problem because the resin matrix and inorganic fillers differ in hardness and do
not abrade uniformly.
This study evaluated and compared six finishing and polishing techniques
to identify the most effective one for micro filled composite restorations.
These six techniques were as follows :
TECHNIQUE I Use of disks of medium, fine and superfine grits in
descending order.
TECHNIQUE II Use of polishing points.
TECHNIQUE III Use of polishing paste with rubber cap.
TECHNIQUE IV Finishing (40 m) and polishing (15 m) diamond burs
were used.
TECHNIQUE V-IV Followed by polishing points.
TECHNIQUE VI-IV Followed by polishing pastes.
26
Conclusion of the Study
Technique I produced the smoothest polished surface technique V was
second best.
“Finishing glass polyalkenoate cements (GIC)”
M.J. Woodfords – BDJ (1988)
This article reports on the SEM surface examination of GIC after furnishing
procedures using rotary and hard instrumentation.
Anhydrous water hardening type and an encapsulated type of GIC’s were
employed.
Finishing procedures employed were:
1. White stones and Vaseline in the slow hand piece at 5000rpm.
2. Soflex disks (Al2O3 disks) and Vaseline in the slow hand piece at 5000rpm.
3. Tungsten carbide blank in air turbine Hand piece with a water spray as
coolant.
Results
Ideal surface is produced by the matrix (any finishing inevitably disrupts
this surface).
- Soflex discs produce a relatively smooth surface.
- Tungsten Carbide disrupts surface of even mature GIC.
- Hand instrument cause marginal breakdown.
27
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Though a varied range of abrasive and polishing agents have been
described with relation to individual dental materials, an ideal abrasive or a
polishing agent which would satisfy all polishing needs of the dental materials,
one would say is yet to be developed.
28
REFERENCES
1. Kenneth J. Anusavice “Philips Science of Dental Materials”. 10th edition,
1998 ; W.B. Saunders Publications.
2. Ralph W. Phiips “Skinner’s Science of Dental Materials”. 9th edition,
1992 ; W.B. Saunders Publications.
3. Combe E.C. “Notes on Dental Materials”. 6th edition, Churchill,
Livingstone Publications.
4. Subbarao V. “Notes on Dental Materials”. 3rd edition, 1997 ; V.K.S.
Publications.
5. Robert G. Craig, William O’Brien and John M. Powers “Dental Materials
– Properties and Manipulation”. 5th edition, 1992; Mosby Publications.
29
CONTENTS
Introduction
Individual Considerations
Desirable characteristics of an Abrasive.
Abrasive Action
Factors Affecting Rate of Abrasion
Factors influencing the Efficiency of Abrasives
Types of Abrasives
Polishing
Hazards encountered in finishing and polishing procedures.
Review of Literature
Summary and Conclusion
References
30