27
PRESS RELEASE  Al go nq ui ns of Bar r ier e Lak e Fil e Cou rt Ac tion ag ainst the Go ver nmen t o f Canada and Past & Current Thir d Party Managers (Kitiganik, Algonquin Territory/January 30, 2015) Chief and Council for the Algonquins of Barriere Lake today filed a lawsuit against Canada and the community’s past and present third party managers, BDO Canada LLP and Hartel Financial Management Corporation. The lawsuit claims harms suffered by Barriere Lake caused by Canada and the third party managers, by mismanaging and withholding funds that were to be used for the benefit of the community and its members. This includes exorbitant fees paid to the third party managers from Barriere Lake’s funds. The “services” provided by the third party managers harmed, rather than helped, our members, and interfered with our ability to improve the administrative, financial, and governance services we provide to our community. Our members continue to experience third world living conditions, in spite of the tremendous wealth generated through resource extraction within our traditional territory. Our roads, water, hydro, school, and social services remain gravely underfunded, when compared to the funding available to Canadians living in non-First Nations communities. The leadership and administration of Barriere Lake have been working diligently to regain control of our own financial resources and governance, but the information essential to do so has been routinely withheld by Canada and by the third party managers. Repeated written and verbal requests for the most basic information about our own finances have been ignored.  After 8 years of third party management, Canada claims that Barriere Lake remains in “default” of the funding agreement imposed b y Canada. The leadership and administration of Barriere Lake have had virtually no control over or information about their finances during that time. Surely, if we remain in “default”, it i s because of chronic underfunding by Canada and the failure of third party managers to competently and diligently managed our finances, for the benefit of the community and its members. Instead, Canada now claims we are in breach of the First Nations Financial Transparency Act for not reporting financial information that remains in the exclusive control of the third party managers. The third party managers hold Barriere Lake’s money in trust, and are therefore required to administer those funds for the benefit of th e community. Instead, for the last 8 years, our community has suffered gravely under the third party management BARRIERE LAKE INDIAN GOVERNMENT  GOUVERNEMENT AUTOCHTONE DU LAC BARRIÈRE

ABL vs AG of Canada

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 1/27

PRESS RELEASE

 Algonquins of Barriere Lake File Court Action against the Government of Canadaand Past & Current Third Party Managers

(Kitiganik, Algonquin Territory/January 30, 2015) Chief and Council for the Algonquinsof Barriere Lake today filed a lawsuit against Canada and the community’s past andpresent third party managers, BDO Canada LLP and Hartel Financial ManagementCorporation. The lawsuit claims harms suffered by Barriere Lake caused by Canadaand the third party managers, by mismanaging and withholding funds that were to beused for the benefit of the community and its members. This includes exorbitant feespaid to the third party managers from Barriere Lake’s funds. The “services” providedby the third party managers harmed, rather than helped, our members, and interferedwith our ability to improve the administrative, financial, and governance services weprovide to our community.

Our members continue to experience third world living conditions, in spite of thetremendous wealth generated through resource extraction within our traditional territory.Our roads, water, hydro, school, and social services remain gravely underfunded, whencompared to the funding available to Canadians living in non-First Nationscommunities.

The leadership and administration of Barriere Lake have been working diligently toregain control of our own financial resources and governance, but the informationessential to do so has been routinely withheld by Canada and by the third partymanagers. Repeated written and verbal requests for the most basic information aboutour own finances have been ignored.

 After 8 years of third party management, Canada claims that Barriere Lake remains in“default” of the funding agreement imposed by Canada. The leadership andadministration of Barriere Lake have had virtually no control over or information abouttheir finances during that time. Surely, if we remain in “default”, it is because of chronic

underfunding by Canada and the failure of third party managers to competently anddiligently managed our finances, for the benefit of the community and itsmembers. Instead, Canada now claims we are in breach of the First Nations FinancialTransparency Act for not reporting financial information that remains in the exclusivecontrol of the third party managers.

The third party managers hold Barriere Lake’s money in trust, and are thereforerequired to administer those funds for the benefit of the community. Instead, for the last8 years, our community has suffered gravely under the third party management

BARRIERE LAKE INDIAN GOVERNMENT   GOUVERNEMENT AUTOCHTONE DU LAC BARRIÈRE

Page 2: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 2/27

regime. Without financial agency, we have been at the mercy of a series of managerswho have ignored our reasonable requests for basic information, and have bouncedcheques to suppliers, interfered with our economic relations with suppliers, hired andfired employees without authority, and otherwise proven themselves completelyunconcerned with the interests, well-being, and future of our community. The same

accountants have charged millions of dollars in fees, which have been paid by BarriereLake, without our consent. And our members continue to live in third world conditions.

The millions paid in fees to the third party managers could have been used by BarriereLake to hire its own professional accounting, finance, and administrative staff, and toimprove the infrastructure and services available to our members. Instead, it has goneto accountants in offices hundreds or thousands of kilometers from our community, whoare neither accountable to our members nor motivated to bring us out of default,because our continued default status ensures that their contracts will be renewed byCanada.

We have attempted to discuss our circumstances with Canada, and requested that thirdparty management no longer be imposed on us. Failing that, we have requestedsupport for taking the steps that Canada views as necessary to bring us out of thirdparty management. Canada, through Minister Valcourt, has ignored or refused theserequests.

Regrettably, we have been left with no choice but bring a legal claim against Canadaand our third party managers for the damages we have suffered during the last 8 years,because of the money taken from Barriere Lake without its consent, the removal of ourautonomy and ability to govern ourselves, the reduction in our administrative andinfrastructural capacity, and the harm to our community’s reputation. Our claim is for$30 million: this represents the losses we have experienced because of the impositionof third party management, the negligent performance of the third party managers, andthe numerous breaches of the fiduciary obligations owed by Canada and the third partymanagers to Barriere Lake. If we are successful, this money will be returned to thecommunity, for the benefit of the community, rather than being held and used for thebenefit of accountants in far-off cities.

-30-

For More Information Contact:

Chief Casey Ratt Cell: (819) 441-8002Tony Wawatie, Interim Director-General Cell: (819) 355-3662Michel Thusky (French) Spokesperson Telephone: (819) 435-2171 & 435-2172

BARRIERE LAKE INDIAN GOVERNMENT   GOUVERNEMENT AUTOCHTONE DU LAC BARRIÈRE

Page 3: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 3/27

Page 4: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 4/27

Page 5: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 5/27

Page 6: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 6/27

Page 7: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 7/27

Page 8: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 8/27

Page 9: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 9/27

Page 10: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 10/27

Page 11: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 11/27

Page 12: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 12/27

Page 13: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 13/27

Page 14: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 14/27

Page 15: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 15/27

Page 16: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 16/27

Page 17: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 17/27

Page 18: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 18/27

Page 19: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 19/27

Page 20: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 20/27

Page 21: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 21/27

Page 22: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 22/27

Page 23: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 23/27

Page 24: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 24/27

Page 25: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 25/27

Page 26: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 26/27

Page 27: ABL vs AG of Canada

8/9/2019 ABL vs AG of Canada

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/abl-vs-ag-of-canada 27/27