Ability to Think Critically

8/14/2019 Ability to Think Critically

1/10

Ability to think critically - 1 -

Running head: ABILITY TO THINK CRITICALLY

Ability to Think Critically

Michael N. Phan

University of Phoenix School of Advance Studies


2/10


Ability to Think Critically

In attempting to define critical thinking, I have learned that no agreement exists on a

single definition of the term. The term critical thinking was first coin by the American

philosopher John Dewey (1910; 1933) under the label of reflective thinking. He described

reflective thinking as active, persistent, and careful consideration of any belief of supposed

form of knowledge in the light of the grounds that support it, and the further conclusions to

which it tends (Fields, 2006; Dewey, 1933, p. 9). According to Dewey, critical or reflective

thinking was a direct response to a suggested resolution of a specifically occasioned

perplexity. Dewey reasoned that

If the suggestion that occurs is at once accepted, we have

uncritical thinking, the minimum of reflection. To turn the thing

over in mind, to reflect, means to hunt for additional evidence, for

new data, that will develop the suggestion, and will either, as we

say, bear it out or make obvious its absurdity and irrelevance

Reflective thinking, in short, means judgment suspended during

further inquiry (Dewey, 1910, p. 224).

The definition presented by Dewey led to a development of his ideas over the next few

decades where though the basic idea remained the same, it branched into more refined

definitions of the term. According to Brown and Gillis (1999), stated Reflective thinking is

seen as closely related to experience by many authors (p. 172). They stated that the key to

learning is not the experienced itself but the reflection related to experience. Furthermore,

Boud, Keogh, and Water (1985) see reflection as the total response of the learner. What he

or she thinks, feels, does, and concludes at the time and immediately after (p. 18). Atkins


3/10


and Murphy (1993), stated that immense of talent is required for reflective thinking, which

self-awareness, critical examination, synthesis, and assessment. They see self-awareness as

individuals ability to analyze honestly their interactions and with experiences, particularly

feelings and thoughts (Brown & Gillis, 1999, p. 173; Boud et al., 1985; Atkins & Murphy,

1993).

Again the development from Dewey, Brown and Gillis, Boud, Keogh, and Water,

Atkins and Murphys definitions were the definition follow-up by Ennis in his 1962 article in

which he calls Critical Thinking: The Correct Assessing of Statements. This definition tends

to exclude creative thinking from critical thinking. In 1987, a much broader definition that

Ennis provided replaced a previous narrow one that creative thinking is, reasonable,

reflective thinking that is focused on deciding what to believe or do (p. 45). The later

definitions presented by researchers lean more towards employing Ennis broader definitive

version by which critical thinking is comprised of both skills and dispositions (Ennis, 1985;

Kadir, 2007). Where skills or abilities are the cognitive aspect of critical thinking, dispositions

or attitudes form the more affective aspect (Jones, Merritt, & Palmer, 1999). In a later

definition, Elder and Paul (1996) described critical thinking as self-improvement in thinking

through standards that assess thinking. They further described critical thinking as the art of

taking charge of your own mind (Ennis, 1985; Kadir, 2007; Elder & Paul 1996; Jones et al.,

1999).

Watkins stated that as the definitions of critical thinking found their footing in the

realm of desirable cognitive development, there was seen a gradual consensus between

parents, educators, and administrators that to enhance the aptitude to reason analytically had

to be one of the prime goals of education (Watkins, 2003). Occasionally, writers of


4/10


government reports and academic studies to lament the inability of countless student to think

critically and as a means of resolving the issue and hence current curriculum development

material for all levels and across the curriculum are urbanized with the prime aim of

developing critical thinking skills (Shu & Yang Wen Chaun, 2004; Unrae, 1997; Wolf, 1997).

In reviewing these definitions of critical thinking, however, is important to consider

that the level of cognitive development, logic and emotionality must also play a key role in

assessing the critical thinking skills of a person. Although the person whom is more

academically challenged such as those in graduate educational programs have more refined

critical thinking skills on a broader scale, it should not imply that the less academically

challenged do not possess any critical thinking skills at all. For this reason Elder and Paul

(2004) further extended their own definition, it is important to understand that to think

critically is a matter of degree. No one is without any critical skills, and no one has them so

fully that there are no areas in his or her life and thought in which uncritical though is

dominant.

By keeping this thought in mind, it would not be wrong to say that the difference in

the definition of critical thinking have evolved not only according to research in cognitive

development over the passage of time, but also according to the refinement in the critical

thinking process of the theorists, who have presented newer and more modern versions of the

definition of critical thinking. An example of this definition was presented in 1998 by

Michael Scriven and Richard Paul, which hints at a sleeker and more intrinsically

intellectualized mode of thinking where they call critical thinking, the intellectually

disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing,

synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation,


5/10


experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action (p. 34).

This definition takes critical thinking to a level where concepts of logic, reasoning, analysis,

problem solving, decision making and evaluation are formally applied to achieve a higher

level of self-awareness (Scriven & Paul, 1998).

The modern day definitions of critical thinking supported by the majority of scholars

considered that is relating to issues that rest uneasily between a normative core and an

empirical surround. The idea that critical thinking is related to the level of personal logic

and emotional and intellectual developing is additionally asserted when he or she said that to

think critically or well is not only to satisfy norms, tacit or expressed, but also to do as people

do. Dominic Massaro in her review of Weinsteins book Re-Thinking Reason: New

Perspectives in Critical Thinking writes, Critical thinking, to ape a classic philosophical

discussion, is a term of achievement. To think critically is to have fulfilled to some extent or

other the demands made upon thinkers as exemplified by human practicespractices that

have to some extent been codified and theorized about by both philosophers and psychologists

(Weinstein, 1997).

This thought is evident when critical thinking is seen as the movement behind modern

educational reform where it advocates the incorporation of the sound practices of reasoning

into the school curriculum in order to foster, in the words of Harvey Seigel, students ability

to be appropriately moved by reason (Seigel, 1999). Ennis definition can also be applied

on critical thinking within this specific context whereby he views critical thinking to be a

reasonable and reflective thinking that is fostered on what to believe or do (Kadir, 2007).

According to the specificities of this definition, critically thinking requires the identification


6/10


of the norms and functional thinking along with an understanding of how these norms can be

inculcated and employed in practice (Weinstein, 1997).

Other researchers in the field of critical thinking, such as Belenky, Clinchy,

Goldberger, and Tarule (1986), of Womens Ways of Knowing criticizes critical thinking for

laying stress on the need for detachment. Belenky et al, finds it inappropriate where the

separate knower holds herself aloof from the subject she is trying to analyze, (p. 36) and

more in favor of connected conversationsreal talk whereas each person serves as a

midwife to each others thoughts, drawing out each others ideas, entering into them, even

arguing passionately, and building together a truth none could have constructed alone (p. 41).

John Peck is another example of a researcher who considers the attempt to teach general

thinking skills especially those taught through informal logic techniques as literal nonsense

since thinking is always about some particular thing or subject (p. 102).

According to Connie Missimer, the current standard approach to critical thinking is

limiting by its view of critical thinking as a reasoned judgment by an individual at any given

moment (p. 119) because she believes that this misrepresents the role of the individual

thought. Laura Duhan Kaplan believes that the current critical thinking textbooks are

ineffective as they tend to teach conformity rather than political autonomy (p. 204) and

considers them to be plagued by a limited sense of available choices. Hence, a wide range of

differing definitions of critical thinking which have risen when the ability to think critically

started being considered in conjunction with mental logic, emotions and social background of

the individual (Weinstein 1997).

Brown and Gillis (1999), surmise this effect of intelligence on critical thinking very

aptly in Using Reflective Thinking to Develop Personal Professional Philosophies where


7/10


they state that reflective thinking is an important part of developing the complex

understanding of ones personal professional philosophy. The individuals who lack the ability

to reflect or employ a previously articulated philosophy as guidelines for critical thought are

liable to be forced into reactive and haphazard patterns of behavior when they are faced with

professional dilemmas. They write, many beliefs and biases of students need to be exposed

and assumptions challenged on the way to developing a philosophy. Research shows that prior

beliefs rarely are change by providing only factual information (Grant & Secada, 1990;

Kaufman, 1996). The emotions of the students must be captured to open the way for

reflective thinking, which in turn may lead to attitude change (Brown & Gillis, 1999; Grant &

Secada, 1990; Kaufman, 1996).

The effect of personal cognitive ability, logic and emotionality on the ability to think

can be assessed much better if one applies these factors on ones own critical thinking

abilities. For instance, if faced with a question that requires a well thought and solid personal

opinion, he or she is better to read a little on the subject before his or her can assess the

situation and offer his or her own point of views. In this situation reading about the subject

before hand would be the cognitive ability, logic and emotionality while the personal opinion

that results from this background would be his or her critical thinking ability. In comparison,

the person whom read on the subject, in other words, with a more advanced cognitive ability,

will also be the ones who can think more in depth on the topic and offer a deeper critical

viewpoint. To surmise, though the ability to think critically is inherent all people, it istheapplication of his or her individual ability, logic and emotionality on this cognitive processes

that affects the depth of his or her critical thinking.


8/10


9/10


Ennis, R. H. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity: Clarification and needed

research. Educational Researchers, 18(3). Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from General

OneFile database.

Fields, A. M. (2006, September). Ill-structured problems and the reference consultation: The

librarians role in developing student expertise. Reference Services Review, 34(3), 405-

420. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from Emerald Group database.

Gibson, C. (1995, Fall). Critical thinking: implications for instruction. (Library

Literacy)(Column) RQ 35.n1, 27. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from Gale Power

Search database.

Grant, C. & Secada, W. (1990). Preparing teachers for diversity. In W. R. Dawson (Ed.),

Handbook of research in teacher education (pp. 403-422). New York: Mcmillian.

Hemming, H. E. (2000, Spring). Encouraging Critical Thinking: ButWhat Does That

Mean? McGill Journal of Education, 35(2), 173. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from

ProQuest database.

Jones, P., Merritt, J., & Palmer, C. (1999). Critical thinking and interdisciplinary in

environmental higher education: The case for epistemological and values awareness.

Journal of Geography in Higher Learning, 23(3), 349-357. Retrieved on Sept. 22,

2008, from ProQuest database.

Kadir, M. Akshir. Ab. (2007). Critical Thinking: A family resemblance in conceptions.

Education and Human Development, (1)(2), 1-11. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from

http://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1252.pdf
http://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1252.pdfhttp://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1252.pdf


10/10


Kaufman, D. (1996). Constructivist-based experiential learning in teacher education. Action

in Teacher Education, 18(2), 40-50. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from Premier

Academic Research database.

Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (1998). Defining Critical Thinking. Journal of Development

Education, pp. 34-35. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from

http://helmet.stetson.edu/departments/library/infoliteracy.doc

Siegel, H. (1999, Spring). What (good) are thinking dispositions?. Educational Theory, 49(2),

207. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from ProQuest database.

Shu, C., & Yang Wen Chaun, L. (2004, March). The relationship among creative, critical

thinking and thinking styles in Taiwan high school student. Journal of Instructional

Psychology, Vol. 31. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from General OneFile database.

Unrae, N. (1997). Thoughtful teachers, thoughtful learners: A guide to helping adolescents

think critically. Scarborough, ON: Pippin Publishing.

Watkins, M (2003). Dialogue, development, and liberation. In I. Josephs (Ed.) Dialogically

in development. Westport, CT: Greenwood. Retrieved on September 22, 2008, from

http://uploads.pacifica.edu/gems/watkins/DialogueDevelopmentLiberatio.pdf

Weinstein, M. (1997, Summer). Re-Thinking Reason: New Perspectives in Critical Thinking.

The American Journal of Psychology, 110(2), 285. Retrieved on Sept. 22, 2008, from

ProQuest database.

Wolf, J. (1997). The beanstalk and beyond: Developing critical thinking through fairy tales

(pp. 74-76). Englewood, Colorado: Teacher Ideas Press.
http://helmet.stetson.edu/departments/library/infoliteracy.dochttp://uploads.pacifica.edu/gems/watkins/DialogueDevelopmentLiberatio.pdfhttp://helmet.stetson.edu/departments/library/infoliteracy.dochttp://uploads.pacifica.edu/gems/watkins/DialogueDevelopmentLiberatio.pdf

Documents

Ability to Think Critically