Aberdeen proving ground advanced planning …...Aberdeen proving ground advanced planning briefing to industry Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground Bryon J. Young 19

Aberdeen proving ground

advanced planning briefing to

industry

Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground

Bryon J. Young

19 November 2014

1

The forecast data is for planning purposes, does not represent a pre-

solicitation synopsis, does not constitute an invitation for bid or request for

proposal, and is not a commitment by the government to purchase the desired products and services

BUILDING STRONG®

Agenda

– ACC-APG Statistics

– Business Process Initiatives

– Responsive Strategic Sourcing for

Services

2

BUILDING STRONG®

ACC-APG FY14 Statistics – Approximately 36,000 actions

executed for $12.1B (including grants and classified contract actions)

– Contract action statistics:

3

Vendor State Actions Obligations

Virginia 7038 $2,940,159,726

Massachusetts 1792 $1,052,720,084

New York 1416 $913,411,137

Maryland 2208 $703,500,295

California 2055 $530,546,411

Fund Type Actions Obligations OMA 6256 $2,595,395,654

OPA 1878 $1,788,783,039

RDT&E (Army) 6860 $1,531,620,904

FMS 1005 $870,960,086

RDT&E (Defense) 1566 $662,886,757

Defense Working Capital Fund, Army 5325 $295,350,513

OTHER 5133 $1,623,543,852

BUILDING STRONG®

Acc-apg fy14 customers

4

CECOM HQ (LRC, ISEC, SEC, TYAD), $1,235,857,989,

10%

PEO C3T, $1,417,520,914, 12%

PEO IEWS, $1,223,210,189, 10%

CERDEC, $318,612,498, 3%

RDECOM (HQ, ARL, ECBC, NSRDEC, STTC), $818,446,843, 7%

RDECOM (Grants/CA/OT), $571,629,930, 5%

PEO Solider, $730,817,304, 6%

FMS, $683,639,239, 6%

Secure Mission, $632,004,743, 5%

NETCOM, $495,996,617, 4%

JPEO CBD, $430,112,125, 4%

HQ, DA, $400,514,666, 3%

PEO M&S, $317,431,020, 3%

TACOM, $247,739,571, 2%

PEO Aviation, $236,382,482, 2%

Dept Navy, $208,815,425, 2%

ATEC, $203,960,715, 2%

IMCOM, $164,093,069, 1%

Other, $1,764,242,163, 15%

Other Customers Include:

Across ACC-APG

Dept Air Force

Army Materiel Cmd

Dept of Defense

Army Sustainment Cmd

PEO EIS

ARMY Intel & Sec Cmd

Div A

Def Health Agcy

DISA

DTRA

Natl Geospatial Intel Agcy

Div B

NAVAL AIR SYS CMD

NAVAL SEA SYS CMD

AMCOM

Div D

ARMY Acq Spt Ctr

FORSCOM

Belvoir

Corp of Engineers

US ARMY South

PEO Ammo

PEO CS&CSS

JIEDDO

Natick

MEDCOM

NGB

Bureau of Med and Surgery

RTP/Adelphi

DARPA

Tenant

AMSAA

Huachuca

TRADOC

Edgewood

CMA

$12.1B Obs

35,797 Act *

38% ASA(ALT)

28% AMC

34% OTHER Customers as Percentages of Obligations

BUILDING STRONG®

Acc-apg Business process

initiatives

5

BUILDING STRONG®


initiatives Continue to improve bonafide

competition

► Sole source measures to improve competition • Possible game changer

► Competitive single bid

► Better definition of existing recompeted work

► FY13 LPTA & Tradeoff statistics - % of the time award made to the incumbent

• LPTA: 7%

• Tradeoff: 42%

► T&M obligations of 1% in FY14, down from 70% in FY10

6

BUILDING STRONG®


initiatives Work to reduce and/or eliminate

bridge contracts

►Government team will more closely

manage contract end dates

7

BUILDING STRONG®


initiatives Closely assess contested contract actions

► Possible reasons for protest increases:

• Increasing effectiveness rate

• Competition for dwindling acquisition dollars

• Service contract protests for incumbents prolong performance time and continue influx of income-Incumbent service contractors may receive additional time on their contract while the GAO protest is pending (GAO has 100 days to decide)

• Less experience in personnel (in debriefings and in communication with industry, and evaluators)

• Emphasis on socio-economic goals

• Difficulty in performing cost realism

8

Fiscal Year ACC-APG Protest Rate

FY11 3%*

FY12 3%*

FY13 3.15%**

FY14 16.94%**

** Protest rate = # of GAO Bid Protests/Total Competitive

Actions over SAT and Competitive Task Orders over $10M

*Notional Rate

BUILDING STRONG®


initiatives Simplify source selection methodologies

► Supplies versus services • LPTA versus tradeoff

► Tradeoff – defined in advance • What elements represent tradespace

• Approximate value for the trade

► LPTA – when tradeoff elements cannot be justified

• Determined by customer (requiring activity)

► Simplified source selection process

► Major elements serving as true discriminators

► Multiple Award Contracts (MACs) • Objective to streamline MAC award, then true

competition at task/delivery order

9

BUILDING STRONG®


initiatives Focus on contractor performance

management

►CPARS

►On-time delivery

►Disbursement rate

►Manage to target cost

10

BUILDING STRONG®

Responsive strategic

sourcing for services (RS3)

11 The forecast data is for planning purposes, does not represent a pre-solicitation synopsis, does not constitute an invitation for bid or request for proposal, and is not a commitment by the government to

purchase the desired products and services

BUILDING STRONG®

Responsive strategic

sourcing for services (rs3) – Knowledge based support services for

requirements with Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) related needs to include:

• Engineering

• Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E)

• Logistics

• Acquisition and Strategic Planning

• Education and Training

12

The forecast data is for planning purposes, does not represent a pre-solicitation synopsis, does not constitute an invitation for bid or request for proposal, and is not a commitment by the government to purchase the desired products and services

BUILDING STRONG®

Rs3 (continued) – Will replace Rapid Response-Third Generation (R2-3G),

Strategic Services Sourcing (S3), Warrior Enabling Broad Sensor (WEBS), Technical, Administrative and Operations Support Services (TAOSS), and Technical Information Engineering Services (TIES)

– Customers may include ACC-APG customers and other DoD and federal agencies

– Anticipated ordering period is five (5) years with one five (5) year option period. Task order PoP may extend up to five (5) years after the ordering period expiration

– Estimated ceiling, including optional ordering period, is $37B, $500 minimum guarantee to each awardee



BUILDING STRONG®

Rs3 (continued)

-The Government anticipates full and open

competition resulting in multiple awards with the

following requirements restricted to small

businesses when two or more capable small

businesses intend to propose

• Less than $10 million

• Acquisition and Strategic Planning Services

• Contracting Officer determination – FAR

16.505(b)(2)(i)(F)



BUILDING STRONG®

Rs3 (continued) - Off-ramps will occur in years three and eight of

contract

• Contractors that have not submitted an acceptable task order proposal in 36 months, have had two or more cost overruns, have poor past performance, or have not met small business participation goals within 5% may be off-ramped

- On-ramps may occur in years three and six of contract

• To increase competition

• To gain access to new technologies or capabilities

- The optional ordering period may not be exercised for any base contract holder that demonstrates these issues prior to the exercise of the option in year five



BUILDING STRONG®

Rs3 (continued) Streamlined source selection methodology broken down in to two phases

reducing costs:

► Phase 1 • Offerors agree to cap fee at 7% (12% R&D) or less for cost reimbursement task

orders

• Fair, reasonable, and realistic cost data for sample labor categories*

• Offerors meet requirements for Corporate Experience, Past Performance, and Small Business Participation Plan (SBPP)*

• Contracts will be awarded without discussions and will not be subject to wait for completion of evaluations in Phase 2, immediately eligible for task order competitions/awards

• Unsuccessful Phase 1 offerors will be moved to Phase 2

► Phase 2 • Unsuccessful offerors from Phase 1 may submit proposal revisions in Phase 2

Example: If an offeror proposes fee rates higher than the rates stated above, they may be considered for an award if the higher rates are justified and determined fair and reasonable

• Timeline for Phase 2 awards will depend upon the number of proposals received and the quality of proposals received for Phase 2

• Phase 2 may not be necessary if sufficient awards are made in Phase 1

*If the individual deviations and waivers are approved, offerors will not be required to submit cost/price or small business participation plans.



BUILDING STRONG®

Rs3 (continued) Tentative milestones:

► Acquisition Strategy Approval – Dec 2014

► Draft solicitation Release – Nov 2014

► Industry Day – 16 Dec 2014

► Solicitation Release – Jan 2015

► Proposals Due – Feb 2015

► Phase 1 Evaluations Complete – Jun 2015

► Phase 1 Contract Awards – Jul 2015

► Phase 2 Evaluations Complete & Contract

Awards – TBD

17

The forecast data is for planning purposes, does not represent a pre-solicitation synopsis, does not constitute an invitation for bid or request for proposal, and is not a commitment by the government to purchase the desired products and services

BUILDING STRONG®

Rs3 (continued)

- Submit questions in writing to Katie

Thompson,

[email protected] or Ashley

Keating, [email protected]

- Questions will be addressed at the RS3

Industry Day



mailto:[email protected]


BUILDING STRONG®

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Baltimore District

Aberdeen Proving Ground Industry

Day

LTC Mike Ruppert, PMP

Deputy District Commander

19 November 2014

BUILDING STRONG®

USACE Workforce

~300,000 Construction

Contractors on

a given day

Unlimited Capability

Perform 100% of Civil Works

&

Military Construction

Leverage Personnel

Resources through

partnering/contracting

with Private Sector

~23,000 Gov’t Employees

~290 Uniformed

Military

20 For official use only

BUILDING STRONG®

One of the largest and most visible military missions in the country

(National Capital Region)

Support to the Intelligence Community (NSA, DIA and others)

Support to the Port of Baltimore and regional economy

The Washington Aqueduct – drinking water for Washington DC

Protection and restoration of the Chesapeake Bay

Regional HTRW Design Center/National Military Munitions Design

Center

Regulatory oversight for natural gas industry pipelines in PA’s

Marcellus Shale Formation

Baltimore District:

What are we known for?


BUILDING STRONG®

Mission Areas

U.S. Central Command, Afghanistan Fort Detrick Navy Bio-Lab

Defense Logistics Agency Solar Wall Flood Wall in Wyoming Valley Levee System


BUILDING STRONG®

U.S. Department of Defense

Mission Support

Defense Distribution Susquehanna Ft. Belvoir Northern Regional Medical Command

Utah Data Center Walter Reed Military Advance Training Center


BUILDING STRONG®

U.S. Army Mission Support

U.S. Army Automotive Technology Evaluation Facility

U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases

Ft. Detrick Emergency Services Center

24

BUILDING STRONG®

USACE Command Boundaries

Alaska

Pacific

Ocean

Division

Northwestern

Division (Portland)

Southwestern

Division (Dallas)

South Pacific

Division (San Francisco)

South Atlantic

Division (Atlanta)

Seattle

Sacramento

Los

Angeles Honolulu

Omaha

Kansas City

Chicago

Tulsa Little

Rock

Mobile

Savannah

Norfolk

Ft. Worth

Louisville

Baltimore New York

Albuquerque

Great Lakes

& Ohio River

Division (Cincinnati)

Related Centers and

Other Special Missions: Huntsville Engr & Support Center

MED-Winchester - Africa, Bosnia, Mid-East

St. Louis District - Archaeology

Philadelphia District - Brokered MILCON

Mobile District - Panama, Puerto Rico, etc

Transatlantic Division – USACE Deployment Center

LEGEND: Engineer Commands

Divisions

District HQ location

Division boundary

Vicksburg

Trans

Atlantic

Division (Winchester)

Districts Outside the US:

Europe (Germany)

Far East (Korea)

Japan

3 Districts in TAD 25

For official use only

BUILDING STRONG®

Baltimore District Missions

Civil Works

Military Support

Emergency Management

Real Estate Environmental Services

Interagency Services Regulatory


BUILDING STRONG®

Our Programs

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

FY

99

FY

00

FY

01

FY

02

FY

03

FY

04

FY

05

FY

06

FY

07

FY

08

FY

09

FY

10

FY

11

FY

12

FY

13

FY

14

FY

15

Washington Aqueduct Civil Works

Environmental DC Schools

IIS Military Programs (All Other)

ARRA RSFO (Non-Milcon)

RSFO UDC & MTV

$689

(Millions)

$619

$628

$837

$854

$894

$950

$912

$990

$1,3

80

$2,2

30

$2,4

31

$2,3

50

$2,2

89

$1,8

07

$1,6

60

$1,7

19


BUILDING STRONG®

Military Construction

Replace Defense Distribution Center Headquarters

Replace U.S. Army Public Health Command

Laboratory at Aberdeen Proving Ground Ft. Belvoir Sensitive Compartmented Information

Facility

Ft. Detrick Hazardous Material Storage Building


BUILDING STRONG® 29


BUILDING STRONG®

Military Emerging Trend:

Workload Centers in FY16-19

Defense Distribution Center Susquehanna Headquarters Facility


BUILDING STRONG®

FY15 Continental United States

Single Award Task Order Contract

(SATOC)

Project Magnitude : $103M

Procurement: Single Award Task Order

Contract

Advertisement: 2nd Quarter

Proposed Acquisition Strategy:

Unrestricted

Task Order Values: $0-$10M

Multiple Award Task Order Contract

(MATOC)

Project Magnitude: $499M

Procurement: Multiple Award Task Order

Contract

Advertisement: 3rd Quarter

Proposed Acquisition Strategy:

Unrestricted & Small Business

Task Order Values: $10M+

Intelligence Community Campus - Bethesda


BUILDING STRONG®

Civil Works

Ocean City, M.D. Inlet, Isle of Wight Bay Potomac Park Levee, Washington, D.C.

Borough of Plymouth Brown Creek Pump Station Dredging the Harbor Channels


BUILDING STRONG® 33


BUILDING STRONG®

FY15 Baltimore Harbor and

Channels, MD.

Maintenance Dredging Project Magnitude:

$10M

Advertisement: 1st

Quarter

Proposed Acquisition

Strategy: Unrestricted


BUILDING STRONG®

FY15 Wicomico River, MD.

Maintenance Dredging Project Magnitude: $1M

- $3M

Advertisement: 3rd

Quarter

Proposed Acquisition

Strategy: Small

Business


BUILDING STRONG®

Environmental Services

Spring Valley Formerly Used Defense Site

Former Frankford Arsenal Remediation W.R. Grace Building 23 Remediation

Sturgis Decommissioning


BUILDING STRONG®

Small Businesses play key roles in the

Baltimore District

• Planting Oyster Bars

• Construction of Flood Risk Reduction Projects

• Environmental Restoration Projects

• Military and Civil Construction

The mission and vision of the Small

Business Office is to strive to be stewards

of the taxpayers dollars by balancing

mission accomplishments and the

Government’s responsibility of socio-

economic development by maximizing

opportunities for small businesses.

Baltimore District looks to benefit from

expertise and talents from all businesses.

DC Local Flood Protection Project

To view NAB’s FY 15 Forecast of Contracting Opportunities (FCO) access:

http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/Portals/63/docs/SmallBusiness/FY15_Contracting_Opps.pdf

We Support Small Business


http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/Portals/63/docs/SmallBusiness/FY15_Contracting_Opps.pdf

BUILDING STRONG®

(As of 9 October 2014 )

Category Dollars Actual % / Statutory Goal / NAB Goal USACE

NAD Goal

Small Business $271,314,715 24.54% / 23% / 23% 41.5%

Small

Disadvantaged $151,869,641 13.73% / 5% / 10% 18%

8(a) $31,594,701 No specific goal for 8(a) - 8(a) included in SDB

accomplishments

Women-Owned $59,374,617 5.37% / 5% / 6% 7%

Service-Disabled

Veteran-Owned $22,698,290 2.05% / 3% / 3% 4%

HUBZone $22,874,680 2.07% / 3% / 3% 11%

Total Dollars Obligated (to include SB awards): $1,105,736,828

Green - Met both the statutory and USACE NAB SB goal

Amber - Met the statutory goal, but didn’t meet the USACE NAB SB goal

Red - Didn’t meet the statutory or USACE NAB SB goal

FY14 Small Business Accomplishments


BUILDING STRONG®

NAB Prime Contract Awards:

Small Business 25% Small Disadvantaged Business 10% Women-Owned Small Business 6% Historically Underutilized Business Zone Small Business 3% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business 3% Historically Black Colleges & Universities/Minority Institutions* 2.5%

USACE Subcontract Awards: (% of Dollars Subcontracted by Large Prime Businesses)

Small Business 50%

Small Disadvantaged Business 17%

Women-Owned Small Business 18% HUBZone Small Business 10% Veteran-Owned Small Business 8.5% Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business 4% * Aspirational Goal

FY 15 Small Business Goals


BUILDING STRONG®

Contracting 101

How to do business with us

Register in System for Award Management database at www.sam.gov

Resolve any Federal Income Tax delinquencies

Find our projects (pre-solicitation and award notices) on Fed Biz Opps

at www.fbo.gov

Respond to the solicitation

Team with experienced firms to gain knowledge: Prime/Sub, Joint

Venture

Understand and comply with bonding requirements for construction

contracts

Grow your capabilities

Write a strong proposal

Request a debriefing


http://www.sam.gov/

http://www.fbo.gov/

BUILDING STRONG®

Determining factors in a business being

selected during the bid process

Relevancy and recency in relation to the contact

requirements

Size standards are driven by NAICS codes, which

identifies a firm's small or large business status

Firms must be registered in the System for Award

Management (formerly referred to as the CCR)

Ultimately, based on market research efforts


BUILDING STRONG®

For More Information:

FY 2014 Forecast of Contracting Opportunities

Awarded IDIQ Contracts http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/BusinessWithUs/SmallBusiness.aspx

Federal Business Opportunities

http://www.fbo.gov

Federal Procurement Data System (Record of Awarded Contracts)

http://www.fpds.gov

Baltimore District Project Fact Sheets

http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/About/ProjectFactSheets.aspx


http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/BusinessWithUs/SmallBusiness.aspx

http://www.fbo.gov/

http://www.fpds.gov/

http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/About/ProjectFactSheets.aspx

BUILDING STRONG®

For More Information:

Contracting Opportunities on Social Media

Facebook http://www.facebook.com/USACEBaltimore Twitter http://www.twitter.com/USACEBaltimore LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/company/u-s-army-corps-of-engineers-baltimore


http://www.facebook.com/USACEBaltimore

http://www.twitter.com/USACEBaltimore

http://www.linkedin.com/company/u-s-army-corps-of-engineers-baltimore













BUILDING STRONG®

Webpage

http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/


http://www.nab.usace.army.mil/

BUILDING STRONG®

Stay in Touch!

about.me/usace.baltimore


BUILDING STRONG®

Points of Contact for Outreach to

your Organization Deputy for Small Business

► Tamika Gray

• E-mail: [email protected]

• Telephone: 410-962-2587

Military Program Manager

► Frank Benvenga


• Telephone: 410-962-6785

Civil Works Program Manager

► Chris Nolta


• Telephone: 410-962-3385

Environmental Program Manager

► Michael Rogers

• E-mail: Michael. J. [email protected]

• Telephone: 410-962-2207






BUILDING STRONG®

Integrated Program Office (IPO)

POCs

APG/Ft. Detrick IPO Program Manager

► Scott Drumheller


• Telephone: 301-619-1925 (Ft. Detrick)

• Telephone: 410-436-8716 (APG)

Capital Area Program Office (CAPO) Manager

► Bill Tully


• Telephone: 703-806-3015




BUILDING STRONG®

Rollup of Military Programs 2015 # Location Description of

Project

Projected

QTR to

Advertise

Estimated

Award

Amount

NAICS

Code

Acquisition

Strategy

Type of

Action

1 NAD-Wide Master Planing A&E

IDIQs

1st or 2nd $30M 541330 (up to

3 awards)

SBSA MILCON

2 Ft. Belvoir, VA Trailers Removal &

Site Restoration-

Belvoir North Area

2nd $1-5M 236220 TBD MILCON

3 Ft. Belvoir, VA

Defense Logistics

Agency-HVAC

Upgrades

2nd $5-10M 238220 TBD MILCON

4 Ft. Belvoir, VA

Defense Logistics

Agency-Replace

Boilers

2nd $1-5M 238220 TBD

MILCON

5 Ft. Belvoir, VA

Defense Logistics

Agency-Repave

Parking Lot

3rd $5-10M 237310 TBD

MILCON

6 Ft. Belvoir, VA/

Arlington Co, VA

Pentagon Sentry

Program-Boundary

Channel Drive

Access Control Point

3rd $1-5M 236220 TBD

MILCON

7 Ft. Belvoir, VA INSCOM SCIF Phase

2

4th $100-$250M 236220 TBD

MILCON


BUILDING STRONG®

Rollup of Military Programs 2015 # Location Description of

Project

Projected

QTR to

Advertise

Estimated

Award

Amount

NAICS

Code

Acquisition

Strategy

Type of

Action

8 Fort Meade, MD Renovation of

Building 4554

4th $10-25M 236220 SBSA MILCON

9 Ft. Belvoir, VA Nolan Building Phase

2 & 3

2nd or 3rd $100-250 236220 TBD MILCON

10 NAD

Wide/CONUS

Hawaii

$400M MATOC 2nd $499M 236220 UNR/SBSA MILCON


BUILDING STRONG®

APG Specific 2015 # Location Description of

Project

Projected

QTR to

Advertise

Estimated

Award

Amount

NAICS

Code

Acquisition

Strategy

Type of

Action

1 APG North, MD Chemical Biological

Radiological Nuclear

& Environmental

2nd or 3rd $30-50M 236220 TBD MILCON

2 APG North, MD Renovation of Bldg

4118

3rd $7-15M 236220 TBD OMA

3 APG North, MD

Renovation of Bldg

4120

3rd $7-15M 236220 TBD OMA

4 APG North, MD

Renovation of Bldg

4220

3rd $7-15M 236220 TBD

OMA


BUILDING STRONG®

FY15 APG, Md.

Public Health Command

Estimated Award

Amount: $200M-250M

Mechanism: Design-Bid-

Build

Advertisement: Now in

source selection

Sub-contractor interest


BUILDING STRONG®

FY15 APG, Md.

20th CBRNE;

Renovation of Existing

Buildings

Award Amount: $30M-

50M

Mechanism: Design-Bid-

Build

Advertisement: 2nd

Quarter

Unrestricted

52


BUILDING STRONG®

FY15 APG, Md.

Renovation of Building

4120

Estimated Award

Amount: $7M-15M

Mechanism: Design-

Build

Advertisement: 3rd

Quarter

Small business set aside


BUILDING STRONG®

FY15 APG, Md.


4220

Estimated Award

Amount: $7M-15M

Mechanism: Design-

Build

Advertisement: 3rd

Quarter



BUILDING STRONG®

FY15 APG, Md.


4118

Award Amount: $7M-

15M

Mechanism: Design-

Build

Advertisement: 3rd

Quarter



BUILDING STRONG®

Looking Ahead: FY16 APG, Md.


4504

Feasibility study

underway

Estimated Award

Amount: $5M-8M

Mechanism: Design-

Build

Advertisement: FY16

Small business set

aside


BUILDING STRONG®

Looking Ahead: FY16 APG, Md.


4508

Feasibility study

underway

Estimated Award

Amount: $5M-8M

Mechanism: Design-

Build

Advertisement: FY16

Small business set

aside


BUILDING STRONG®

Questions?


Documents

Aberdeen proving ground advanced planning …...Aberdeen proving ground advanced planning briefing to industry Army Contracting Command – Aberdeen Proving Ground Bryon J. Young 19