7
AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

AAE450 Spring 2009

Communications

Ground Stations

Communication Equipment

Alternative Landing Method

March 26, 2009[Trent Muller] [COM]

Page 2: AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

AAE450 Spring 2009

Communication Equipment on Lander

Equipment Model Manufacturer Mass (kg) Power Usage (W)

Price (2009 $)

Lander-Earth Antenna (2)

Patch Antenna SSTL 0.16 -- 40,000

Lander-Earth Receiver

RX-200S SpaceQuest 0.2 1.5 30,000

Lander-Earth Transmitter

TX-2400 SpaceQuest 0.2 34 24,000

Lander-Rover Antenna

ANT-100 SpaceQuest 0.1 -- 500

Lander-Rover Transceiver

TR-400 SpaceQuest 0.21 6 20,000

Computer Board RAD6000 BAE 0.85 13 200,000

Video Camera HF10 Canon 0.38 3.9 1,000

Antenna Pivot (2) -- -- 0.38 2.13 168

Totals 2.48 60.53 315,668

[Trent Muller] [COM]

100 gram Payload

Page 3: AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

AAE450 Spring 2009

10 kg PayloadEquipment Model Manufacturer Mass (kg) Power Usage

(W)Price (2009 $)

Lander-Earth Antenna (2)

Patch Antenna SSTL 0.16 -- 40,000

Lander-Earth Receiver

RX-200S SpaceQuest 0.2 1.5 30,000

Lander-Earth Transmitter

TX-2400 SpaceQuest 0.2 34 24,000

Computer Board RAD6000 BAE 0.85 13 200,000

Video Camera HF10 Canon 0.38 3.9 1,000

Antenna Pivot (2) -- -- 0.38 2.13 168

Totals 2.17 54.53 295,167

[Trent Muller] [COM]

Page 4: AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

AAE450 Spring 2009

Ground StationsGround Station Latitude (o) Longitude (o) Dish Size

(m)

1 Mt. Pleasant Radio Observatory. Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 42.81 S 147.44 E 26

2 Ventspils International Radio Astronomy Centre (VIRAC). Irbene, Latvia

57.55 N 21.85 E 32

3 Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute (PARI). Rosman, North Carolina

35.20 N 82.87 W 26

[Trent Muller] [COM]

• Worst case altitude for coverage gap : 80,000 km from VIRAC• Plan to use Universal Space Network from LEO to 80,000 km• Universal Space network consists of 14 ground stations all around the world• Estimated cost: $1 million (2009$) for one year of usage, one station at a

time.

Page 5: AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

AAE450 Spring 2009

Backup SlidesTop down view of Earth showing ground stations an coverage gaps

1. Mt. Pleasant2. VIRAC3. PARI

Altitdues Altitude (km)

h1 7662.33

h2 3977.22

h3 8704.07

[Trent Muller] [COM]

Page 6: AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

AAE450 Spring 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

Side view of Earth showing coverage of Mt. Pleasant Observatory’s worst case scenario.

For southern hemisphere: Moon’s orbital inclination positive with northern hemisphere tilted towards the Moon

Observatory Altitude (km)

Hobart 18031.14 km

Irbene 79232.09 km

Rosman 11569.17 km

Page 7: AAE450 Spring 2009 Communications Ground Stations Communication Equipment Alternative Landing Method March 26, 2009 [Trent Muller] [COM]

AAE450 Spring 2009

High Energy Tangent Landing Represents the Lander landing

with a significant horizontal velocity and sliding on Lunar surface without skipping, digging in, or creating a crater immediately upon impact.

Assumes constant deceleration based on initial impact.

Based on an old design iteration with a dry mass of 163.49 kg

Shows three landing cases

1) 10g

2) 15g

3) 20g

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.50

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

horizontal velocity (km/sec)

dist

ance

(km

)

skid distance vs. horizontal velocity

10g

15g20g

[Trenten Muller] [COM]