79
User Interaction Design and Emergency Department Workflow User Interaction Design and User Interaction Design and Emergency Department Emergency Department Workflow Workflow A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers Keith Conover, M.D., FACEP Mercy Hospital, Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers Keith Conover, M.D., FACEP Mercy Hospital, Pittsburgh University of Pittsburgh

A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

User Interaction Design and Emergency Department WorkflowUser Interaction Design and User Interaction Design and Emergency Department Emergency Department WorkflowWorkflow

A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers

Keith Conover, M.D., FACEPMercy Hospital, Pittsburgh

University of Pittsburgh

A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers

Keith Conover, M.D., FACEPMercy Hospital, Pittsburgh

University of Pittsburgh

Page 2: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Presentation available atwww.pitt.edu/~kconoverPresentation available atwww.pitt.edu/~kconover

Page 3: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

• Emergency Department characteristics

• ED staff characteristics• Error vs. computers• Usability and User

Interaction Design (“User Interface”) Principles

• CPOE in the ED• Books and websites

• Emergency Department characteristics

• ED staff characteristics• Error vs. computers• Usability and User

Interaction Design (“User Interface”) Principles

• CPOE in the ED• Books and websites

OutlineOutlineOutline

Page 4: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 5: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 6: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

ED CrowdingED CrowdingED Crowding

1. Richardson LD, Asplin BR, Lowe RA. Emergency department crowding as a health policy issue: past development, future directions. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40(4):388-93.

2. General Accounting Office. Hospital emergency departments: Crowded conditions vary among hospitals and communities. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2003. Report No.: GAO-03-460.

1. Richardson LD, Asplin BR, Lowe RA. Emergency department crowding as a health policy issue: past development, future directions. Ann Emerg Med 2002;40(4):388-93.

2. General Accounting Office. Hospital emergency departments: Crowded conditions vary among hospitals and communities. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office; 2003. Report No.: GAO-03-460.

Page 7: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 8: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

(From critical incident stress training materials for

search and rescue)

(From critical incident (From critical incident stress training materials for stress training materials for

search and rescue)search and rescue)

Emergency services workers:– have obsessive/compulsive personality traits– like to be in control– are risk oriented– are action-oriented– “need to be needed”– are dedicated

Emergency services workers:–– have have obsessive/compulsive obsessive/compulsive personality traitspersonality traits–– like to be like to be in controlin control–– are are risk orientedrisk oriented–– are are actionaction--orientedoriented–– ““need to be neededneed to be needed””–– are are dedicateddedicated

Page 9: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 10: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Interrupt-driven, Multi-tasking

InterruptInterrupt--driven, driven, MultiMulti--taskingtasking

Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH. Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"? Acad Emerg Med 2000;7(11):1239-43.

Chisholm CD, Collison EK, Nelson DR, Cordell WH. Emergency department workplace interruptions: are emergency physicians "interrupt-driven" and "multitasking"? Acad Emerg Med 2000;7(11):1239-43.

Page 11: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 12: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Error vs. ComputersError vs.

Computers

Page 13: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Error in MedicineError in

Medicine

Page 14: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

100,000 Avoidable

Deaths a Year

Harvard Medical Practice Study,

1984

100,000 100,000 Avoidable Avoidable

Deaths a Deaths a YearYear

Harvard Medical Harvard Medical Practice Study, Practice Study,

19841984

Page 15: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Institute of Medicine:

“To Err is Human”

Institute Institute of Medicine:of Medicine:

““To Err is To Err is HumanHuman””

• Institute of Medicine• Part of National

Academy of Science• “To Err is Human:

Building a Safer Health System” 2000

• Institute of Medicine• Part of National

Academy of Science• “To Err is Human:

Building a Safer Health System” 2000

Page 16: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Computers will Change Your Future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Computers will Change Computers will Change Your Future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Your Future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Page 17: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 18: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

How ED Staff View HIS Systems

(courtesy Alan Cooper)

How ED Staff View How ED Staff View HIS SystemsHIS Systems

(courtesy Alan Cooper)(courtesy Alan Cooper)

Page 19: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Usability and

Design

Usability and

Design

Page 20: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 21: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 22: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Usability & Interface

Usability & Usability & InterfaceInterface

Page 23: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Hide The Ejector Seat Levers

Hide The Ejector Hide The Ejector Seat LeversSeat Levers

Page 24: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

48% of Recent Software Code is Interface

48% of Recent Software 48% of Recent Software Code is InterfaceCode is Interface

Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press, 1993

Page 25: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Implementation vs.Mental Models

Implementation vs.Mental Models

Page 26: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Goal-Directed DesignGoal-Directed Design• Not looking stupid• Not making any big mistakes• Getting an adequate amount

of work done• Having fun

(or at least not being too bored)

Page 27: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Goal-Directed DesignGoal-Directed Design

Page 28: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Learning CurvesLearning CurvesE

ffort

Effo

rt

ResultsResults

Page 29: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Learnability/ MemorabilityLearnability/ Memorability

• Learnability:– ISO: icons interpreted correctly by 2/3 of subjects– 6/12 by knowledgeable users; 1/12 by new users

• Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride” signs– Good Learnability– Excellent Memorability

• “Kiss and Ride” signs– Poor Learnability, but– Excellent Memorability

• Learnability:–– ISO: icons interpreted correctly by 2/3 of subjectsISO: icons interpreted correctly by 2/3 of subjects–– 6/12 by knowledgeable users; 1/12 by new users6/12 by knowledgeable users; 1/12 by new users

• Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride” signs–– Good LearnabilityGood Learnability–– Excellent MemorabilityExcellent Memorability

• “Kiss and Ride” signs–– Poor Learnability, butPoor Learnability, but–– Excellent MemorabilityExcellent Memorability

Lindgaard G, Chessari J, Ihsen E. Australian Telecommunications

Research 21(2):17-29

Page 30: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Response TimeResponse TimeResponse Time

• Feeling of direct manipulation: 0.1 second– Longer, and no feeling of control

• “Waiting for computer”: 1 second– Longer, and users restrict use of system

--Nielsen, Jakob. Designing Web Usability

• Much worse in ED

• Feeling of direct manipulation: 0.1 second–– Longer, and no feeling of controlLonger, and no feeling of control

• “Waiting for computer”: 1 second–– Longer, and users restrict use of systemLonger, and users restrict use of system

----Nielsen, Jakob. Designing Web UsabilityNielsen, Jakob. Designing Web Usability

• Much worse in ED

Page 31: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Design IntegrityDesign IntegrityDesign Integrity

“Objects constructed

from genuine materials are

always valued more highly than those that use a

cheaper substitute”

“Objects constructed

from genuine materials are

always valued more highly than those that use a

cheaper substitute”

Mullet K, Sano D.Designing Visual

Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques

Sunsoft, 1995

Page 32: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Design IntegrityDesign IntegrityDesign Integrity

Page 33: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Japanese Kanban Signs

Japanese Japanese KanbanKanban SignsSigns

• Shibui:subdued beauty

• Wabi:elegant simplicity

• Shibui:subdued beauty

• Wabi:elegant simplicity

Mullet K, Sano D.Designing Visual

Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques

Sunsoft, 1995

Page 34: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Abstraction and Simplicity in Design

Abstraction and Abstraction and Simplicity in DesignSimplicity in Design

Mullet K, Sano D.Designing Visual

Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques

Sunsoft, 1995

Page 35: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Taped-On InstructionsTapedTaped--On On

InstructionsInstructions

Mullet K, Sano D.Designing Visual

Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques

Sunsoft, 1995

Like the presence of taped-on instructions in the physical workplace, the presence of help text in the interface is itself a reliable indicator of flaws in the underlying design.

Page 36: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Screen DesignScreen DesignScreen DesignMullet K, Sano D.Designing Visual

Interfaces: Communication Oriented Techniques

Sunsoft, 1995

Page 37: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Test Time! Have you been awake?

Test Time! Have you Test Time! Have you been awake?been awake?

• Which of the two following notebook-metaphor interfaces is a Stickley chair, and which is wood-grain vinyl?

• Why?

• Which of the two following notebook-metaphor interfaces is a Stickley chair, and which is wood-grain vinyl?

• Why?

Page 38: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 39: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Changing One WordChanging One WordChanging One Word

• NEXUS cervical-spine clearing failures in EMS: wording changed

• Signature block for standing orders

• NEXUS cervical-spine clearing failures in EMS: wording changed

• Signature block for standing orders

Page 40: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Changing One WordChanging One WordChanging One Word

Page 41: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 42: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Tognazzini’sParadox

TognazziniTognazzini’’ssParadoxParadox

Problem: find out if user has a color monitor

1. Are you using a color monitor?

2. Is the picture above in color?Failure: 25%

Problem: find out if user has a color monitor

1. Are you using a color monitor?

2. Is the picture above in color?Failure: 25%

3.

Are the words above in color?Color: 0%. B+W: 0%. Green: 100%.

3.

Are the words Are the words

above in color?above in color?

Color: 0%. B+W: Color: 0%. B+W: 0%. Green: 100%.0%. Green: 100%.

Tognazzini, B (“Tog”). TOG on Interface.1992; Reading, MA: Addison-

Wesley.

Green

Blue

Orange

Magenta

Page 43: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Tognazzini’sParadox

TognazziniTognazzini’’ssParadoxParadox

4.

Are the words above in more than one color?Color: 0%. B+W: 20%. Green: 50%.

4.

Are the words above in more than one color?Color: 0%. B+W: 20%. Green: 50%.

5. Are the words above in several different colors?Color: 0%. B+W: 20%. Green: 25%.

6. Do the words above appear in several different colors?0% failure!

5. Are the words above in several different colors?Color: 0%. B+W: 20%. Green: 25%.

6. Do the words above appear in several different colors?0% failure!

Green

Blue

Orange

Magenta

Page 44: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Users are Not DesignersUsers are Not Designers

“Leaving the design to the users is the ultimate abdication of the designer’s responsibility to provide a quality product, and many studies have shown that users…customize their interface in ways that are detrimental to their productivity.”

“Leaving the design to the users is the ultimate abdication of the designer’s responsibility to provide a quality product, and many studies have shown that users…customize their interface in ways that are detrimental to their productivity.”

Jakob Nielsen, Foreword to Mullet K, Sano D.

Designing Visual Interfaces.

Page 45: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Customizable Tracking Board?

Customizable Tracking Board??

“Users can click on any column heading to sort by that category, can drag the lines to make columns wide or narrow, or even hide them altogether.”

“Users can click on any column heading to sort by that category, can drag the lines to make columns wide or narrow, or even hide them altogether.”

Page 46: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Usability PearlsUsability Pearls

• Your Best Guess is Not Good Enough

• The User Is Always Right

• The User Is Not Always Right

• Users are Not Designers

• Your Best Guess is Not Good Enough

• The User Is Always Right

• The User Is Not Always Right

• Users are Not Designers

Nielsen J. Usability Engineering.

Academic Press, 1993

• Designers are Not Users • Vice Presidents

are Not Users• Less Is More• Details Matter • Help Doesn’t• Usability Engineering

Is Process

• Designers are Not Users • Vice Presidents

are Not Users• Less Is More• Details Matter • Help Doesn’t• Usability Engineering

Is Process

Page 47: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

PosturePostureSovereign Posture:– Takes over entire screen– Expects to be solely in

charge of the computer and the user

– E.g., word processor, spreadsheet

Daemonic Posture– Only needs a little bit of

screen– just one of many things

getting attention from computer and user

– E.g., modem dialup applet

Sovereign Posture:–– Takes over entire screenTakes over entire screen–– Expects to be solely in Expects to be solely in

charge of the computer and charge of the computer and the userthe user

–– E.g., word processor, E.g., word processor, spreadsheetspreadsheet

Daemonic Posture–– Only needs a little bit of Only needs a little bit of

screenscreen–– just one of many things just one of many things

getting attention from getting attention from computer and usercomputer and user

–– E.g., modem E.g., modem dialupdialup appletapplet

“Coke Machine” = kiosk = “drive-through” posture– Takes over entire screen– Expects to be solely in charge– Always the same whenever

anyone walks up to it– Interface is extremely simple,

learnable, memorable

“Coke Machine” = kiosk = “drive-through” posture–– Takes over entire screenTakes over entire screen–– Expects to be solely in chargeExpects to be solely in charge–– Always the same whenever Always the same whenever

anyone walks up to itanyone walks up to it–– Interface is extremely simple, Interface is extremely simple,

learnable, memorablelearnable, memorable

Page 48: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

CPOE in the ED?CPOE in the ED?CPOE in the ED?

• $450 million hospital HIS failure VA Hospital at Bay Pines, Florida

• Deinstall of CPOE at Cedars-Sinai due to “physician revolt”

• Dr. David Classen of First Consulting Group says > 6 other hospitals also deinstalled HIS

• $450 million hospital HIS failure VA Hospital at Bay Pines, Florida

• Deinstall of CPOE at Cedars-Sinai due to “physician revolt”

• Dr. David Classen of First Consulting Group says > 6 other hospitals also deinstalled HIS

Page 49: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

CPOE in the ED?CPOE in the ED?CPOE in the ED?

• At EDIS 2005 deinstallation forum: multiple complaints that a major HIS vendor’s ED module totally unusable.

• Rush in Chicago has CPOE everywhere—except in the ED.

• Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005;293(10):1197-203.

• At EDIS 2005 deinstallation forum: multiple complaints that a major HIS vendor’s ED module totally unusable.

• Rush in Chicago has CPOE everywhere—except in the ED.

• Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA 2005;293(10):1197-203.

Page 50: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Nielsen on KoppelNielsen on Nielsen on KoppelKoppel

Page 51: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

ED Niche VendorsED Niche VendorsED Niche Vendors

• Most EDs with CPOE do so through an ED “Niche” vendor’s system

• Niche vendors understand– ED crowding– ED staff– ED workflow– User interface design

• Most EDs with CPOE do so through an ED “Niche” vendor’s system

• Niche vendors understand–– ED crowdingED crowding–– ED staffED staff–– ED workflowED workflow–– User interface designUser interface design

Page 52: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Standing OrdersStanding OrdersStanding Orders

Computer-based Standing Orders better than reminders for enforcing standards and preventing omission errors:

Dexter PR, Perkins SM, Maharry KS, Jones K, McDonald CJ. Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004;292(19):2366-71.

Computer-based Standing Orders better than reminders for enforcing standards and preventing omission errors:

Dexter PR, Perkins SM, Maharry KS, Jones K, McDonald CJ. Inpatient computer-based standing orders vs physician reminders to increase influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004;292(19):2366-71.

Page 53: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 54: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 55: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 56: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Books and

Websites

Books and

Websites

Page 57: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Mullet K, Sano D.

Designing Visual Interfaces:

Communication Oriented

TechniquesSunsoft, 1995

Mullet K, Sano D.

Designing Visual Interfaces:

Communication Oriented

TechniquesSunsoft, 1995

Page 58: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 59: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 60: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Nielsen J. Usability

Engineering. Academic

Press, 1993

Nielsen J. Usability

Engineering. Academic

Press, 1993

Page 61: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 62: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 63: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 64: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 65: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 66: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 67: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 68: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 69: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 70: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 71: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,
Page 72: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

[Stalin’s Statue]:Next Slide, Please![Stalin[Stalin’’s Statue]:s Statue]:

Next Slide, Please!Next Slide, Please!

For re-education campaigns, nothing is

better than the Autocontent Wizard!

For re-education campaigns, nothing is

better than the Autocontent Wizard!

Comrade, why are we having this meeting? The

rate of information transfer is asymptotically

approaching zero!

Comrade, why are we having this meeting? The

rate of information transfer is asymptotically

approaching zero!

Military Parade, Stalin Square, Budapest, April 4, 1956Military Parade, Stalin Square, Budapest, April 4, 1956

An integrated application solution for

show trials!

An integrated application solution for

show trials!

There’s no bullet list like Stalin’s

bullet list!

There’s no bullet list like Stalin’s

bullet list!

But why read aloud EVERY slide?

But why read aloud EVERY slide?

Page 73: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

ww

w.n

cem

i.org

ww

w.n

cem

i.org

ww

w.n

cem

i.org

Page 74: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

ww

w.n

cem

i.org

ww

w.n

cem

i.org

ww

w.n

cem

i.org

Page 75: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Annual National Symposium on Emergency Department Information Systemsfrom the Pennsylvania Chapter of the American College of Emergency Physicians

One Domain - One Source for all your EDIS Solutions / PaACEP isEDIS

isEDIS.com

December 5-8, 2005 Doubletree Paradise Valley Resort Scottsdale, AZ

Page 76: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

• EDs: crowded, busy• ED staff: action-oriented, interrupt-driven• Error vs. computers: oversell?• Usability and User Interaction Design Principles

– Hiding the ejector seat levers– Mental vs. implementation models– Goal-directed design– Learnability vs. memorability– Response time– Design integrity– Abstraction and simplicity– Tognazzini's paradox– Posture

• CPOE in the ED: standing orders• Books and websites

• EDs: crowded, busy• ED staff: action-oriented, interrupt-driven• Error vs. computers: oversell?• Usability and User Interaction Design Principles

–– Hiding the ejector seat leversHiding the ejector seat levers–– Mental vs. implementation modelsMental vs. implementation models–– GoalGoal--directed designdirected design–– Learnability vs. memorabilityLearnability vs. memorability–– Response timeResponse time–– Design integrityDesign integrity–– Abstraction and simplicityAbstraction and simplicity–– Tognazzini'sTognazzini's paradoxparadox–– Posture Posture

• CPOE in the ED: standing orders• Books and websites

Page 77: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

It seems so obvious…It seems so obviousIt seems so obvious……

Page 78: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Challenge = OpportunityChallenge = OpportunityChallenge = Opportunity

• The ED is intolerant of stupidity • The ED is intolerant of poor usability.• The ED is intolerant of inefficiency.• The ED is intolerant of poor user

interaction design.• The ED is intransigent.• But if you can make it work in the ED,

you can make it work anywhere.

• The ED is intolerant of stupidity • The ED is intolerant of poor usability.• The ED is intolerant of inefficiency.• The ED is intolerant of poor user

interaction design.• The ED is intransigent.• But if you can make it work in the ED,

you can make it work anywhere.

Page 79: A Worst-Case Scenario for Developers · • Washington, D.C.: “Park and Ride”signs – Good Learnability – Excellent Memorability • “Kiss and Ride”signs – Poor Learnability,

Presentation available atwww.pitt.edu/~kconover

Thank you!

Presentation available atwww.pitt.edu/~kconover

Thank you!