18
I ." i = ? NASA Technical Memorandum 87212 SBE Paper No. 860615 . A Two-Dimensional Nmkricai Study of ~IE Flow Inside the combustion Chamber of a Motored Rotary Engine (NASA-TH-87212) A THO-CIflEBSIOWAL NUtlERRCBL M86-19289 STUDY OF THE FLGEi IYSIDE THE CCBbUSUON CHAMBERS OF A HCTCfiED ROTALBY EBGIIE :NASA) 16 p RC A02/HP AD1 CSCL OlA Unclas 63/02 05561 T.1-P. Shih ad S.L. Ymg University of Florida Guinesville, Florida and H.J. Schock Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio Prepared for the 1986 SAE International Congress and Exposition Detroit, Michigan, February 24-28, 1986

A Two-Dimensional Nmkricai Study of ~IE Inside combustion ......16 p RC A02/HP AD1 CSCL OlA Unclas 63/02 05561 T.1-P. Shih ad S.L. Ymg University of Florida Guinesville, Florida and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • I . " i = ?

    NASA Technical Memorandum 87212 SBE Paper No. 860615

    .

    A Two-Dimensional Nmkricai Study of ~IE Flow Inside the combustion Chamber of a Motored Rotary Engine

    (NASA-TH-87212) A THO-CIflEBSIOWAL NUtlERRCBL M86-19289 STUDY OF THE FLGEi I Y S I D E THE C C B b U S U O N CHAMBERS OF A HCTCfiED ROTALBY E B G I I E :NASA) 16 p RC A02/HP A D 1 CSCL OlA Unclas

    63/02 05561

    T.1-P. Shih a d S.L. Ymg University of Florida Guinesville, Florida

    and

    H.J. Schock Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio

    Prepared for the 1986 S A E International Congress and Exposition Detroit, Michigan, February 24-28, 1986

  • ‘ C

    SAE Technical Paper Ser i i

    86061 5

    A Two-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Flow Inside the

    Combustion Chamber of a Motored Rotary Engine

    T.1-P. Shih and S.L. Yang UniversityofFiorida

    and

    H.J. Schock NASA Lewis Research Center

    1986 SAE International Congress and Expodtbn Detroit, Michigan

    February 24-28.1986

  • The appearance of the code at the bottom of the first page of this paper indicates SAEs consent that copies of the paper may be made for personal or internal use, or for the personal or internal use Of specific clients. This consent is given on the con- dition, however, that the copier pay the stated per article copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., Operations Center, 21 Congress St., Salem, MA 01970for copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law. This consent does not extend to other kinds of copying such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or promotional purposes, for creating new collec- tive works, or for resale.

    Papers published prior to 1978 may also be copied at a per paper fee of $2.50 under the above stated conditions.

    SAE routinely stocks printed papers for a period of three years following date of publication. Direct your orders to SAE Order Department.

    To obtain quantity reprint rates, permission to reprint a technical paper or per- mission to use copyrighted SAE publications in other works, contact the SAE Publica- tions Division.

    SA€ GLOBAL MOBILITY DATABASE

    No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.

    ISSN 01 48-71 91 Copyright 1986 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.

  • A Two-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Flow Inside the

    ABSTRACT

    A numerical study was performed to investi- gate the unsteady, multidimensional flow inside the combustion chambers of an idealized, two- dimensional, rotary engine under motored condi- tions. The numerical study was based on the time-dependent, two-dimensional, density- weighted, ensemble-averaged conservation equa- tions of mass, specie, momentum, and total energy valid for two-component ideal gas mix- tures, The ensemble--averaged conservation equations were closed by a K-a model of turbulence. This K-r model of turbulence was modified to account for some of the effects of compressibility, streamline curvature, low-Reynolds number, and preferential stress dissipation. servation equations were obtained by the highly efficient implicit-factored method of Beam and Warming. The grid system needed to obtain solutions were generated by an algebraic grid generation technique based on transfinite inter-- polation. Results of the numerical study are presented in graphical form illustrating the flow patterns during intake, compression. gaseous fuel injection, expansion, and exhaust.

    Numerical solutions to the con-

    DIFFICULTIES WITH THE SUPPLY of aviation gaso- line in several parts of the world have given rise to the need for more fuel-efficient and multifuel-capability general aviation aircraft engines (1-3).* One engine that is well suited for general aviation aircraft and can meet the requirements of higher fuel-efficiency and a greater tolerance to fuels with broader specifi- cations is the stratified-charge rotary engine (3).

    *Numbers in parentheses designate ref- erences at end of paper.

    Combustion Chamber of a Motored Rotary Engine

    T.1-P. Shih and S.L. Yang University of Florida

    and

    H.J. Schock NASA Lewis Research Center

    In order to design more fuel-efficient and more fuel-tolerant stratified-charge rotary engines, it is necessary to have a good under- standing of the physics (fluid flow, heat trans fer, and combustion) that take place inside the engines' combustion chambers. Relatively few investigators have studied the physics taking place inside rotary engines. Experimental research in rotary engines so far has been con- fined to studies on engine performance and emissions (4-10) and to high-speed photographic studies of combustion (11,121. Hathematical research in rotary engines has been broader in scope but has been limited to quasi-dimensional (13-22) and one-dimensional (23,251 analyses. To date, no studies have reported details of the unsteady, multidimensional flowfield inside rotary engine combustion chambers.

    The unsteady, multidimensional flowfield inside a rotary engine combustion chambers is complex. Owing to this complexity, progress towards understanding the details of this flow- field can only be made in a piecemeal manner by focusing on specific problems. Furthermore, it is necessary to first study simplified rotary engines and later study increasingly more realistic rotary engines.

    The objective of this study was to use a numerical method to investigate the flow pat- terns inside one of the combustion chambers of a simplified rotary engine under motored condi- tions. The simplified rotary engine studied here was two-dimensional (i.e., it was a rotary engine of infinite width) with "planar" gaseous fuel injection into the combustion chamber dur- ing the compression process. Also it was assumed that there was no leakage across the seals. The present study constitutes the first attempt at numerically studying the unsteady, multidimensional flow inside rotary engines. This study was conducted for a motored configu- ration in order to compare model results to experimental data which will soon be available.

    01 48-7 1 91 /86/0224-06 15W2.50 Copyright 1986 Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.

    SHIH ,

    1

  • In this report the simplified rotary engine studied is described in detail. Afterwards, formulation of the problem along with the essence of the numerical method of solution are presented. Finally, results for one numerical simulation are presented illustrating the flow patterns during intake, compression, gaseous fuel injection, expansion, and exhaust.

    DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM

    A motored, two-dimensional rotary engine is shown in Fig. 1. It consists of a housing, an intake port, an exhaust port, a gaseous fuel injector, a rotor, three seals, three combustion chambers (the three regions bounded by the rotor, housing, and seals), and a shaft. The equations that describe the geometry of this rotary engine are given in Refs. 26 and 27 and summarized in Table I. The Cartesian coordi- nates X1 and Y1 describing the inner surface of the housing (denoted as surface 1 in Fig. 1) are given by Eqs. (1) and (2) (Table I). The Cartesian coordinates X2 and Y2 describ- ing the outer surface of the rotor (denoted as surface 2, 3 , and 4 in Fig. 1) are given by Eqs. ( 3 ) to (12) (Table I). The geometry of the rotor pockets is given by Eqs. (10) to (12). Here, it is noted that the parameter C rep- resenting the distance between the rotor apex and the housing is set at 0.004 m which is some- what large. the numerical method of solution. Since leakage was not considered, the value chosen for C should not seriously affect the flow patterns. The origin and orientation of the Cartesian coordinate system is shown in Fig. 2(a).

    For this motored rotary engine, as the rotor rotates inside the housing, each of the three combustion chambers goes through five processes in the following order: intake, com- pression, gaseous fuel injection, expansion, and exhaust. Because of this symmetry, we only need to study the physics taking place inside one of the three combustion chambers. The combustion chamber chosen is the region bounded by surfaces 1, 2, 5, and 6 in Fig. 1.

    As mentioned previously, leakage across the seals was not considered. If leakage across the seals was considered, we could still study the physics of the airflow taking place inside the rotary engine by only analyzing one combustion chamber.

    The value chosen is to facilitate

    Figure 1. - Geometry of a two-dimensional rotary engine.

    I*,

    X-Y-t coordinate system. IBI

    C q - 1 coordinate system

    Figure 2 . - Spatial domain the the coordinate system.

    Initially, the combustion chamber to be studied is located at the beginning of the intake process (i.e., set e in Eqs. ( 3 ) and (4) to zero) and is filled with stagnant air at a constant static temperature Ti and pressure Pi. Suddenly, the shaft starts to rotate at a constant angular velocity R of 5000 rpm (revolutions/min) which in turn causes the rotor to rotate in the clockwise direction. This starts the intake process.

    combustion chamber through the intake port. The stagnation temperature To and pressure Po (Po > Pi, i.e., turbocharged) of the entering air are both constants. During the early part of the intake process, the exhaust port is also open. Thus some of the air also leaves the combustion chamber through the exhaust port. The back Rressure of the exhaust port is maintained at Once the trailing apex (denoted by AT in Fig. 1) passes point B on the housing (see Fig. l), the intake port is closed. The reason for closing this port earlier is to facilitate the numerical method of solution. Once the intake port closes, the compression process starts. Later, between crank angles 81 and 82, a gaseous fuel (octane) is injected into the combustion chamber. Still later when the volume of the combustion chamber starts to increase, the expansion process starts. Once the leading apex (denoted by AL in Fig. 1) passes point C on the housing (see Fig. 1). the exhaust port opens initiating the exhaust process. The late opening of the exhaust port is to facilitate the numerical method of solu- tion. As noted earlier, the back pressure of the exhaust port is maintained constant.

    For the problem just described, we are interested in knowing the details of the flow patterns inside the combustion chamber during intake, compression, gaseous fuel injection, expansion, and exhaust.

    During the intake process, air enters the

    Pe,h (Pe.,h < Pi).

    FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM

    The equations that govern the problem des- cribed in the previous section are the conserva- tion equations of mass, species, momentum, and total energy for two--component ideal gas mix- tures. In this numerical study, the following

    SHIH

    2

  • TABLE I. - EQUATIONS DESCRIBING GEOHETRY OF ROTARY ENGINEa

    Equation

    X i = E COS (3A) + (R + C) COS (A)

    Y 1 = E sin (3A) + (R + c) sin (A)

    X2 = E sin ( 8 ) + XRO COS (813) + YRO sin (8/3)

    Yp = E cos (8) + YRO cos (W3) - XRO sin (8/3)

    where

    e = [ Q d t = M

    XRO = XR COS ( r / 6 ) + Y p sin ( ~ 1 6 )

    YRO = YR COS ( r / 6 ) + XR sin ( % / 6 ) XR = R cos (2V) - ( 3 E 2 / R ) sin (6V) sin (2V)

    1 / 2 cos (3V) cos (2V) - P 2 2 1 - (9E /R 1 sin2 ( 3 V ) ]

    X

    YR = R sin (2V) - ( 3 E 2 / R ) sin (6V) cos (2V)

    1 / 2 2 2 2

    1 - (9E /R ) sin (3V) ] cos (3V) cos (2V) - P Y

    Px = P cos (2V)

    Py = P sin (2V)

    T v < V t V 1 - 0

    ]I V 2 L V 5 V 1 1 - cos “(VI - V)/(V1 - V2) - P ) ( V - v ) / ( V * - V3) v < V t V

    2 P + (P p = [ ? I P 1 i 3 3 - +I1 - cos[n(v - V4)/(V3 - V4)]/ v4 < v 5 v 3

    v < V t V 4 0 L -

    ( 5 )

    (9)

    (10)

    (11)

    (12)

    aA and V are parametric parameters. A varies between 0 and 2%. V varies between VL = n/6 and VT = r / 2 for surface 2 (see Fig. 1); between VL = 5n/6 and VT = 7 n / 6 € o r surfaces 3; and between VL = 3r/2 and VT = l l r / 6 for surface 4 . E = 0.015 m, R = 0.1045 m. C = 0.004 m, Pi = Pp = 0.005 m, V 1 = VL + 0.75 (VT - VL). V2 = VL + 0.625 (VT - V L ) S v3 = VL = 0 . 3 7 5 (VT - VL), V4 = VL + 0.25 (VT - VL). and R = 5000 rpm.

    simplifications were made to the conservation equations: (I) all thermodynamic and transport properties (except for the binary diffusion coefficient) were taken to be constants, (TI) the binary diffusion coefficient was taken to be inversely proportional to the local mixture density, (111) pressure gradient contribution

    to specie diffusion and momentum transport due to species diffusion were neglected. ( I V ) irreversible coupling effects between the tem- perature gradient and the specie concentration gradient (Soret and Dufour effects) were neglected, (V) gravity force was not considered, ( V I ) bulk viscosity was taken to be zero, (VII)

    SHIH

    3

  • radiation heat transfer was not considered, and ( ~ 1 1 1 ) chemical reactions did not occur. Furthermore, since the flow of interest is tur- bulent and present computing capabilities pro- hibit direct or large eddy simulations of turbulence, the conservation equations were density-weighted, ensemble-averaged and closed by a K-E model of turbulence ( 2 8 ) . The K-E model of turbulence employed was modified to account f o r some of the effects of compressibil- ity ( 2 9 ) , streamline curvature ( 3 0 ) , low Reynolds number ( 3 1 ) , and preferential stress dissipation ( 3 2 ) .

    conservation equations and the K-E model of turbulence used in this numerical study are summarized in Table 11. Equations (13) to ( 4 4 ) in Table I1 constitute a closed system in seven dependent variables: density (71, mass frac- tion of air (IC,), x-component of the velocity (G) , y-component of the velocity (T), total energy (TI, turbulent kinetic energy (K), and dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy (E).

    The boundary and initial conditions cor- responding to Eqs. (13) to ( 4 4 ) are given in Table 111. The no-slip condition requires the fluid velocity next to a solid wall to be equal to the velocity of the solid wall. This condi- tion gives Eqs. ( 4 5 ) and ( 4 6 ) . Here, it is noted that the K-E model of turbulence employed was modified to account f o r some of the effects of low-Reynolds number so that the model can be applied all the way to the wall (i.e., wall functions are not needed).

    The gas temperature next to a solid wall equals the temperature of the solid wall. all walls maintained at given temperatures, this boundary condition results in Eqs. ( 4 7 ) and ( 4 8 ) .

    The walls are assumed to be nonporous. This boundary condition is expressed by Eq. ( 4 9 ) .

    sipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy are both set equal to zero at solid walls because of the turbulence model employed. These two boundary conditions are given by E q . ( 5 0 ) .

    sure (Po) of the air entering the combustion charher t h r x g h t h e lfitake p o r t are ccnstaxt as reflected by Eqs. (51) and ( 5 2 ) . The mass fraction of the air entering the combustion chamber through the intake port is unity and is given by Eq. ( 5 3 ) . At the intake port, the x-component of the velocity is zero and the y-component of the velocity is determined by the Bernoulli equation. These two boundary condi- tions are given by Eqs. ( 5 4 ) and ( 5 5 ) . The turbulent kinetic energy and the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy of the air entering through the intake port are given by Eqs. ( 5 6 ) and ( 5 7 ) .

    At the fuel injector, gaseous fuel (octane) is injected into the combustion chamber when the crank angle 8 is between 81 and 8 2 . During fuel injection, the stagnation tempera-

    The density-weighted, ensemble-averaged

    With

    The turbulent kinetic energy and the dis-

    The stagnation temperature (To) and pres-

    ture of the fuel (Tf) is kept constant as shown by Eq. ( 5 8 ) . The fuel is injected at an angle a into the combustion chamber (see Fig. 1). The xand y-components of the velocity are given by Eqs. ( 5 9 ) and (60). The first- derivative of the pressure normal to the fuel injector is taken to be zero. This boundary condition is given by Eq. ( 6 1 ) . The turbulent kinetic energy and the dissipation rate of tur- bulent kinetic energy of the fuel at the fuel injector are given by Eqs. ( 6 2 ) and ( 6 3 ) .

    At the exhaust port, the back pressure (Pexh) is maintained constant. This condition is used to calculate the y-component of the velocity f o r the gas leaving the combustion chamber as indicated by Eq. ( 6 4 ) . At the exhaust port, the x-component of the velocity along with the first-derivative with respect to y of the following variables are zero: mass fraction of air, pressure, temperature, turbulent kinetic energy, and dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy. These boundary conditions are given by Eqs. ( 6 5 ) and ( 6 6 ) .

    the beginning of the intake process (8 = 0) and the combustion chamber is filled with air at static pressure Pi and static temperature Ti. At this time, the air is in a state of homogeneous turbulence with zero mean velocity. The turbulent kinetic energy and the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy of the air are both constant. These initial conditions are specified by Eqs. ( 6 7 ) to ( 7 2 ) .

    At time t equal to zero, the rotor is at

    NUMERICAL METHOD OF SOLUTION

    Solutions to the governing equations formu- lated in the above section can only be obtained by numercial methods. In this study, solutions were obtained by a finite different method.

    All finite-difference methods involve two approximations. First, the continuous domain of the problem must be replaced by time levels and a system of grid points. Second, the governing partial differential equations must be replaced by finite -difference equations. These two approximations are described below.

    TIME LEVELS AND GRID SYSTEM - Finite- difference nethods only provide solutions at t h e time levels and the grid points. The time increment between two successive time levels (i.e., the time-step size) must be made small enough to ensure numerical stability and tempo- ral accuracy. For the present problem, the rotor is started impulsively from 0 to SO00 rpm. For such a problem, it is necessary to use a very small time-step size in the beginning (Courant number much smaller than unity). As time progresses, the time-step size used can be allowed to increase steadily until it reaches some preassigned value (corresponding to a Courant number much larger than unity). Such variable time-step sizes were employed here. The time-step size used between time levels n and n+l (denoted by Atnf1) was as follows:

    SHIH

    4

  • TABLE 11. - GOVERMING EQUATIONSa

    Eq. No. Equation

    - (13) a -- a --

    (14) a -- - a - a a -

    a --2 a -- a - 2 - a a t a t pu + pu ay ax

    a -- a --2 a 2 - a a t - a -- p v + - p ~ + d y p v = - - ( F + ; p K ) + - p it + - p i a t ax

    a -- a -- - at pxA + ax P a A + - a Y PVXA = :x + G ce 6 XA (15) - a -- + - p u v = - - ( P t ; p K ) + - p a x e n it + - p i a y e w

    (16) a Y a x e x y a y e y y

    a; a 2 - - a - at + - (6 + + - pK)u + - (6 + + 3 PK); ax 3 a Y t - t - a t - t -

    U + T v ) + - p ( 1 U + T v) a ax e xx XY a Y e Yx YY = - p (1

    - + - A a a Y e - aT a Y + ay te [ (hi - $) + (CpA - CpB) (? - Ti)] & a) ( 1 7 )

    L - - ' ; ; K + - s G K + - p v K = - a a Y -- a ax [( p t a ':)E] + k [ ( p +$) E 1 G - p + D a t a ax (18)

    - a a t ax

    where

    t c = ;DAB + C (26 1

    Ct = pt/Sct

    e t a = a + x

    (27)

    ( 2 8 )

    SHIH

    5

  • TABLE 11. - C o n t i n u e d .

    A = p C / P r t t p t

    = {z - pXA -- [ (hl - hi) - (CpA - CpB) T.] - (hi - CpBTi) - i i ( G2 + y2) - sl) { RPjiA (k - k) + .) /((CpA - CpB) + CpBj]

    T = { G - [(hi - hi) - (CpA - CpB) Ti] - .; (( - .,,Ti) - 4 P (G2 + G2)

    - 2 S = C 1 1 K f ' (12;'' Pn + Ps) - C2f2 PE /K + f 3

    2

    c ' 1 = [cl t a(C1 - 1.5)]/c1

    C" = ( 3 + - L) /c 1 1

    n = 3 -+a

    2

    D = f BL 2 p ( $ l 2 )

    f v = fBL exp [-3.4/(1 + RT/50)2]+ l/(l + 0 . 5 7 2

    f 2 = f BL [l - 0.3 exp (- R:)]

    (35)

    ( 4 2 )

    ( 4 3 )

    R T = p:/pc

    SHIH

    6

    ( 4 4 )

  • TABLE 11. - Concluded.

    - = density-weighted mean zf g, 1 = unweighted mean of g, T = den- sity, u = x-component velocity. v = y-component velocity. = total energy, P = pressure. T = temperature, K = turbulent kinetic energy, c = dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, )r = dynamic viscosity, D m = binary diffusion coef- ficient, A = thermal conductivity, Cpi = constant pressure specific heat of component of component turbulent Schmidt number = 1, Prt = turbulent Prandtl number = 1, c,, = 0.09, C1 = 1 . 4 4 , C2 = 1 . 9 2 . OK = 1 . 0 , a, = 1 . 3 , C;" = 2.24/C1, a/aC = derivative normal to the boundary, fBL equals 1 in the boundary layer next to solid walls and equals 0 outside the boundary layer, fl = 1.0.

    - u

    i, Hi = molecular weight of component i, hf = specific enthalpy i, Ti = reference temperature. R = universal gas constant, sct =

    TABLE 111. - BOUNDARY MID IHITIU COMDITIOHSa

    Location Equation

    u = v = o Housing surface

    ax 2 - ay2 I UE-, v = - at at Rotor surf ace and apices

    - T = 300 K Housing surface

    - T = 300 K Rotor surface

    and apices

    .., - axA a< = O Housing and rotor surfaces, apices

    Housing and rotor surfaces, apices

    (49)

    ( 5 0 ) K = c = o

    5 2 P = 1 . 0 1 ~ 1 0 U/m

    0 Intake port

    T = 300 K 0

    Intake port

    - x = 1 . 0 A - u = o

    (53) Intake port

    Intake port

    Intake port

    (54)

    ( 5 5 )

    Intake port

    Intake port

    Fuel injector

    (57)

    ( 5 8 ) T = 300 K f

    (59) Fuel injector

    SHIH

    7

  • TABLE 111. - Concluded.

    Fuel injector

    Fuel injector

    Fuel injector

    Fuel injector

    Exhaust port

    Exhaust port

    Exhaust port

    Everywhere inside the combustion chamber at t = 0

    , . . * u = v/cotan a

    2 - K = (n V) 3

    6 = K3/2/~4L2)

    112 - v = c [2(F - Pexh)lp] DE

    - u = o

    I -

    p = Pi / ( RT /MA) - x = 1 A - - u = v = o

    K = constant

    c = constant h

    anl = 0.03, n2 = 0.0075, L1 = intake port diameter, Vo = 40 m/sec, n3 = 0.03, n4 = 0.0075, L2 = fuel injector diameter, CDI = discharge coefficient for intake port, C D ~ = discharge coefficient for the exhaust port, Pi = lo5 N/m2, Pexh = 9.9X10 N/m2.

    "S [e(n + 1) - e(n)l/Q n = 0,1,2, . . .

    (73)

    '"t Aef/Q n = n + 1, n t 2, ... S S Atn+l =

    where

    2 3 + a3 (n/ns) e(n) = eo + al (n/ns) t a2 (n/ns) (74)

    a = A8 + Ae - 2(e - e 1

    3 [ f 1 € 0

    +3/ns 2 + 2/ns 31 (75)

    a =€I - 8 - a - a (77) l f o 2 3

    In Eqs. (73) to (78), 8 is the angular speed of the shaft (Q = 5000 rpm). 8, is the crank angle at which we begin computations (8, ;1: 0). 8f step size becomes a constant ( O f = 1 radian). The parameter ns denotes the time level when 8 = Of (ns = 800). traversed by the shaft during the first time step (hel = 0.001 Aef). h8f is the crank angle traversed by the shaft during each time step after time level n = ns 8f. The parameter nt is the total number of time steps needed to traverse 6n crank angles (nt = 10 000).

    of grid points (intersections of grid lines) used should be kept to the minimum required to resolve spatially all significant features of

    is the crank angle after which the time-

    A81 is the crank angle

    o r crank angle

    For computational efficiency, the number

    SHIH

    8

  • the flow. Here the system of grid points employed was as follows. In the x-y-t or Cartesian coordinate system (Fig. 2(a)), the grid points moved with the combustion chamber as the rotor rotated inside the housing. This reduced the number of grid points needed. To further reduce the number nf g r i d points needed. grid points were clustered in regions where they are needed and widely spaced in regions where they are not needed. Here, more grid points were placed near the rotor. housing, and seals to resolve the steep gradients of the dependent variables in those regions. Finally, grid lines interesected the rotor and the housing perpen- dicularly to facilitate implementation of normal derivative boundary conditions.

    To facilitate derivation of finite- difference equations, implementation of boundary conditions, and programming, the nonuniformly distributed and moving grid points in the x-y-t coordinate system were mapped onto another coordinate system, the F-q- i coordinate system. In addition, grid lines in the x-y-t coordinate system corresponded to coordinate lines (i.e., lines of constant 5 or constant q) in the F-q- i coordinate system.

    This mapping of grid points is known as grid generation. Here, the mapping or grid generation was achieved by transfinite inter- polation ( 3 3 . 3 4 ) . The functional relationship between the two coordinate systems obtained by transfinite interpolation was derived in Ref. 3 4 and summarized by Eqs. (79) to ( 8 9 ) in Table IV.

    difference equations used to approximate the governing equations surmnarized in Table I1 were derived by the implicit-factored method of Beam and Warming ( 3 5 , 3 6 1 . The details of the finite- difference equations used along with their der- ivation were described elsewhere ( 3 7 ) . Here, only the essence will be presented.

    The first step in deriving the finite- difference equations was to replace all deriva- tives with respect to t, x, and y by derivatives with respect to 1, E, and 0 . The second step was to replace all derivatives with respect to T (including the metric coefficients from the coordinate transformation) by the second- order accurate in time Crank-Nicolson time- difference formula. The third step was to employ a linearization procedure. The fourth step was to employ an approximate factorization procedure followed by splitting of the differen- tial operator. Finally, all spatial derivatives (including the metric coefficients) were replaced by second order accurate in space central-difference formulas. Here it is noted that all metric coefficients were evaluated by finite difference formulas instead of by analytical differentiation. This was done to avoid geometrically induced errors ( 3 4 , 3 8 1 .

    the steps described above formed systems of linear equations with block tridiagonal coefficient matrices and were solved by the noniterative Thomas' algorithm. These finite-

    FINITE-DIFFERENCE EQUATIONS - The finite

    The finite-difference equations derived by

    difference equations provided the solutions at every grid point and time level presented in the next section.

    RESULTS

    N=%erical s~lutims were generated to investigate the flow patterns inside the com- bustion chambers of the rotary engine depicted in Fig. 1 during intake, compression, gaseous fuel injection, expansion, and exhaust. Den- sity, mass fractions of fuel and air, x- and y-components of the velocity, energy, tempera- ture, pressure, turbulent kinetic energy, and dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy were calculated at 1071 (i.e., 51-by-21) grid points (see Fig. 3 ) for 10 000 time levels. Only results for the velocities (velocities relative to the stationary housing) are pre- sented. These results are shown in Figs. 4 to 16 illustrating the flow patterns. Do not infer velocity gradients from these figures because the velocity vectors were plotted to best illustrate the flow patterns.

    during the intake process. part of the intake process, both the intake and the exhaust ports were open. Accordingly, air was found to enter the combustion chamber through the intake port and to exit through the exhaust port as shown in Fig. 4 . Here. the stagnation pressure of the air entering the combustion chamber Po was made slightly higher than the exhaust port back pressure Pexh (i.e., slightly turbocharged) so that back flow through the intake port did not gccur. Later in the intake process, only the intake port was open and a high speed jet issued into

    Figures 4 to 6 illustrate the flow patterns During the early

    Figure 3. - Grid system.

    Figure 4 - Flow pattern at crank angle 8 = .17 radians or 1@.

    SHIH

    9

  • TABLE IV. - COORDINATE TRANSFORMATIONa

    where

    1--=0.5 A - A A - AL L ( B f, + 1 ) - BE {I + [(BE + l)l(Bi - I)] (2E-1)f T

    v - v 1 - v T L - v = 0.5 (BE - 1) + BE {l +[(BE + l)l(BE - l)] (2E-1))-1

    I (88)

    (89)

    aX1, Yl, X2, and Y2 are given by Eqs. (1) to (12) in Table I with the parameters A and V related to E as shown by Eqs. (87) and (88) in this table; BE = 0.1; B = 0.3. TI

    the combustion chamber (Figs. 5 and 6 ) . In Fig. 6, a very small region of recirculating flow can be observed near the intake port. However, this recirculating flow region was found to appear aperiodically and then disap-- pear. The disappearance of the recirculating flow is due to the general motion of the entire combustion chamber in one direction.

    terns during compression. Recirculating flows Figures 7 and 8 illustrate the flow pat-

    SHIH

    10

    were not observed during the compression process.

    terns during gaseous fuel injection. Here gaseous fuel (octane) was injected into the com- bustion chamber between crank angles 81 = 7.4 rad or 425" and 82 = 8 . 5 rad or 487". The velocity of the fuel jet was given by Eqs. ( 5 9 ) and (60) in Table 111. The maximum speed of the fuel jet was

    Figures 9 to 11 illustrate the flow pat-

    Vo = 60 m/sec and the fuel was

  • Figure 5. - Flow pattern at crank angle 9 = 1.40 radians or e.

    Figure 6. - Flow pattern at crack angle 9 = 2 79 radians or 1604

    Figure 7. - Flow pattern at crank angle 9 = 6.23 radians or 357

    Figure 8. - Flm pattern at crank angle 9 = 7.21 radians or 413 '.

    Figure 9. - Flav pattern at crank angle 9 = 7.59 radians or 435'.

    Figure 10. - Flan, pattern at crank angle 9 = 7.70 radians or 441'.

    Figure 11. - Flow pattern at crank angle 9 = 8. '27 radians or 474'.

    i n j e c t e d a t an angle of a = 45" ( s e e Fig. 1). When t h e f u e l w a s f i r s t i n j e c t e d , i t s momentum w a s low i n comparison t o t h e momentum of t h e gas a l r eady i n s i d e t h e combustion chamber. Conse- quent ly , a t this t i m e t h e f u e l j e t could n o t p e n e t r a t e very deeply i n t o t h e combustion cham- ber as shown i n F ig . 9. Late r as t h e momentum of t h e f u e l j e t increased , it penet ra ted much deeper i n t o t h e combustion chamber and a rel- a t i v e l y l a r g e r e c i r c u l a t i n g flow reg ion can be observed a s shown i n F ig . 10. Towards t h e end of t h e f u e l i n j e c t i o n process , t h e momentum of t h e f u e l j e t was aga in low i n comparison t o t h e momentum of t h e gas i n s i d e t h e combustion cham- ber and t h e f u e l j e t was de f l ec t ed a s shown i n F ig . 11.

    SHIH

    11

  • Results for the fuel injection process should be interpreted carefully. First, in realistic rotary engines, a liquid fuel instead of a gaseous fuel is injected. A liquid fuel jet has much more momentum than a gaseous fuel jet at identical jet velocities. Second and more important, in realistic rotary engines, the fuel jet invokes a three-dimensional phenomenon known as a jet in a crossflow. Jets in cross- flows cannot be accounted for by two-dimensional numerical studies.

    terns during the expansion process. lating flow patterns were observed.

    terns during exhaust. Here, we can observe some recirculating flows near the exhaust port as the gas rushed out of the combustion chamber.

    pared with other numerical or experimental data because they do not yet exist. As noted in the Introduction, the present study constitutes the first attempt at numercially studying the unsteady, multidimensional flow inside rotary engine combustion chambers.

    Figures 12 and 13 illustrate the flow pat- No recircu-

    Figures 14 to 16 illustrate the flow pat-

    The results presented above were not com-

    Figure 12. - Flow pattern at crank angle 8 = 11.10 radians or 4%'.

    Figure 16. - Flow pattern at crank angle 8 = 18.1 radians or 1037'.

    CONCLUDING REMARKS

    The results generated in this study illus- trate some of the major features of the flow patterns taking place inside the combustion chambers of a two-dimensional rotary engine with gaseous fuel injection. From the results obtained so far, it appears that the mathemati- cal model developed here can be used to study the effects of a number of engine design and operating parameters (such as those relating to the fuel injector, rotor pocket, engine speed, and intake-exhaust manifold pressure ratio) on the flow patterns.

    account for all the important factors which influence combustion inside a real rotary engine. In particular, the effects of a jet in a crossflow (taking place during intake and fuel injection) as well as Taylor vortices can only be accounted for by a three-dimensional analy- sis. Since jets in crossflows and Taylor vor- tices can significantly affect the flowfield inside rotary engines, a three-dimensional numerical study is already underway.

    Clearly, a two-dimensional study cannot

    Figure 13. - Flow pattern at crank angle 8 = 12.55 radians or 719'.

    REFERENCES

    Figure 15. - Flow pattern at crank angle 8 = 17.1 radians or 980'.

    1.

    2 .

    Figure 14. -F low pattern at crank angle 8 = 16.72 radians or 9584

    Willis, E.A., "General Aviation Internal- Combustion Engine Research Programs at NASA Lewis Research Center," NASA TH-78891, 1978.

    Willis, E.A., and Strack, W.C., "An Overview of General Aviation Propulsion Research Programs at NASA Lewis Research Center," SAE paper No. 810624, 1981.

  • 3. Willis, E.A., "Development Potential of Intermittent Combustion (IC) Aircraft Engines for Commuter Transport Applica- tions," SAE Paper No. 820718, 1982.

    4. Jones, C., Lamping, H.D., Myer. D.M., and Loyd, R.W.. "An Update of the Direct Injected Stratified Charge Rotary Combustion Engine Developments at Curtiss-Wright," SAE Paper No. 770044, 1977.

    5. Jones, C. and Berkowitz, M., "Multifuel Rotary Aircraft Engine, '* AIAA Paper No. 80-1237, 1980.

    6. Lainping, R.K., Manning, I., Meyer, D., and Tj oa , B. , "Performance, Emissions, and Physical Characteristics of a Rotating Com- bustion Aircraft Engine," NASA CR-135119, Supplement A, 1980.

    7. Schock, J.J., Rice, W.J., and Meng, P.R.. "Experimental Analysis of IMEP in a Rotary Combustion Engine," SAE Paper No. 810150, 1981.

    8. Heng, P.R., Rice, W.J., Schock, H.J., and Pringle, D.P., "Preliminary Results on Per- formance Testing of a Turbocharged Rotary Combustion Engine," SAE Paper No. 820354, 1982.

    9. Cichanowize, J.E., and Sawyer, R.F., "Rotary Engine Combustion with Hydrogen Addition." SAE Paper No. 760611, 1976.

    10. Burley, H.A., Heloney. M.R., and Stark, T. L. , "Sources of Hydrocarbon Emissions in Rotary Engine," SAE Paper No. 780419, 1978.

    11. Jones, C., "The Curtiss-Wright Rotary Com- bustion Engines Today," SAE Paper No. 886D, 1964.

    12. Bayer, R.J., DeNagel, S.F., and Steiner, J.C., "Rotary Combustion Engine Hydrocarbon Source Studies," Paper presented at the Central States Section of the Combustion Institute, West Lafayette, Indiana, April 1978.

    13. Eberle, M.K. and Klomp. E.D., "An Evaluation of the Potential Gain from Leakage Reduction in Rotary Engines," SAE Paper No. 730117. 1973.

    14. Lawton, D., Miller, D.H., and Hutchinson, D.P., "Digital Simulation o r Rotary Piston Engines," Paper C144137, I Hech E Confer- ence: Engine Performance Modeling, Institu- tion of Mechanical Engineers, 1973.

    15. Benson, R.S. and Sierens, R . , "Some Gas Dynamic Studies in Wankel Engine," Paper 64/76, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 1976.

    16. Benson, R.S. and Sierens, R . , "Simulation of the Wave Action in the Inlet and Exhaust System and Calculation of the Burnt Mass Fraction in a Rotary Wankel Engine." Israel Journal of Technology, Vol. 15, 1977, pp. 209-221.

    17. Blair. G.P. and Fleck, R., "The Unsteady Gas Flow Behavior in a Charge Cooled Rotary Piston Engine." SAE Paper No. 770763, 1977.

    18. Danieli, G.A., Ferguson, C.R., Heywood, J.B., and Keck, J.C., "Predicting the Emis- sions and Performance Characteristics of a Wankel Engine," SAE Paper No. 740186, 1914.

    19. Danieli, G.A., "A Performance Model of a Wankel Engine, Including the Effects of Burning Rates, Heat Transfer, Leakage and Quenching Compared with Measured Pressure Time Histories." Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Hechanical Engineering, HIT, 1976.

    20. Danieli, G.A., Keck, J.C., and Heywood, J.B., "Experimental and Theoretical Analysis of Wankel Engine Performance," SAE Paper No. 780416, 1978.

    21. Norman, T.J., "A Performance Model of a Spark Ignition Wankel Engine: Including the Effects of Crevice Volumes, Gas Leakage, and Heat Transfer," Master Thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1983.

    22. Roberts, J.M., "Heat Release Estimation and Prediction of Wankel Stratified-Charge Com- bustion Engine," Master Thesis. Dept. of Hechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1985.

    23. Bracco, F.V. and Sirignano, W.A., "Theoreti- cal Analysis of Wankel Engine Combustion," Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 7, 1973, pp. 109-123.

    24. Bracco, F.V. and Sirignano, W.A., "Theoreti- cal Analysis of Stratified, Two-Phase Wankel Engine Combustion," Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 8, 1973, pp. 69-84.

    25. Reitz, R.D. and Bracco, F.V., "Studies Toward Optimal Charge Stratification in a Rotary Engine," Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 12, 1976, pp. 63-74.

    26. Ansdale, R.F., The Wankel RC Engine-Design and Performance, Iliffe Books Limited. London, 1968, pp. 131-139.

    27. Yamamoto, K., Rotary EnRine, Sankaido G o . , Limited, Tokyo, Japan, 1981, pp. 11-13.

    28. Shih, T.1-P., "Mathematical Models for the Numerical Study of Turbulent Flows," sub- mitted to ASME J. of Fluids Engineering, 1985.

    SHIH

    13

  • 29. Morel, T. and Mansour, N.N., "Modeling of Turbulence in Internal Combustion Engines," SAE Paper No. 820040, 1982.

    30. Leschziner, M.A. and Rodi, W., "Calculation of Annular and Twin Parallel Jets Using Various Discretization Schemes and Turbulence-Model Variations," ASME Journal - of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 103, 1981, pp. 352-360.

    31. Launder, B.E. and Sharma, B.I., "Application of the Energy-Dissipation Model of Turbu- lence to the Calculation of Flow Near a Spinning Disk," Letters in Heat and Mass Transfer. Vol. 1, 1974, pp. 131-138.

    32. Hanjalic, K. and Launder, B.E., "Sensitizing the Dissipation Equation to Irrotational Strains," ASME Journal of Fluids Engineer- __ inx. Vol. 102, 1980, pp. 456-461.

    33. Smith, R . E . , "Two-Boundary Grid Generation f o r the Solution of the Three Dimensional Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations," NASA TM-83123, 1981.

    Thb paper Ir rubject to rwldon. Strtemeab md opinbns ad- mced In prpen or dkuwion M the i u t h d ~ md M hb mrpondblllty, not SAE'I; however. the p ~ p a has beem adited by SAE for unlform ctyling md format. Mrusdon WlLL be printed with the paper If it is publlshd In SAE Tmuctlonr. For parmbdon to publlrh thh piper In full or In put, contact the SAE Publlcitions Dfvfiton.

    34. Yang, S.L. and Shih, T.1-P, "An Algebraic Grid Generation Technique f o r Time-Varying Two-Dimensional Spatial Domains," in press Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Fluids.

    35. Beam, R . H . and Warming, R.F., "An Implicit Factored Scheme f o r the Compressible Navier- Stokes Equations," AI,AA Journal, Vol. 16, 1978, pp. 393-402.

    36. Shih, T.1-P., Smith, G.E., Springer, G.S., and Rimon, Y., "Boundary Conditions f o r the Solution of the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations by an Implicit Factored Method," Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 52, 1983, pp. 54-79.

    37. Shih, T.1-P, Yang, S . L . , and Schock, H.J., Jr., "Application of the Implicit-Factored Method to Two-Dimensional Unsteady Compres- sible Flow Problems with Arbitrary Geome- tries," to be submitted.

    38. Hindman, R.G., "Generalized Coordinate Forms of Governing Fluid Equations and Associated Geometrically Induced Errors," AIAA Journal, Vol. 20, 1982, pp. 1359-1367.

    SHIH

    14

  • 1. Report No- NASA TM- 8721 2 SAE Paper No. 860615

    2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No.

    9. Performing Organization Name and Address

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lewis Research Center Cleveland, Ohio 44135

    4. Title and Subtitle

    11. Contract or Grant No.

    5. Report Date

    I Technical Memorandum 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address

    A Two-Dimensional Numerical Study of the Flow Inside the Combustion Chambers of a Motored Rotary Engine

    7. Author@)

    1. I-P. Shih, S.L. Yang, and H.J. Schock

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546

    6. Performing Organization Code

    505-62-1 1 8. Performing Organization Report No.

    E-2871 10. Work Unit No.

    14. Sponsoring Agency Code :

    7. Key Words (Suggested by Author@))

    I 5. Supplementary Notes

    18. Distribution Statement

    Prepared for the 1986 SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit; Michigan, February 24-28, 1986. T. I-P. Shih and S.L. Yang, University of Florida, Galnesvllle, Florida 32611; H.J . Schock, NASA Lewis Research Center. This work was supported by NASA Grant NAG 3-363.

    9. Security Classif. (of this report)

    Unclassified

    6. Abstract

    A numerical study was performed to investigate the unsteady, multidimensional flow inside the combustion chambers of an idealized, two-dimensional, rotary engine under motored conditions. The numerical study was based on the time- dependent, two-dimensional, density-weighted, ensemble-averaged conservation equations of mass, specie, momentum, and total energy valid for two-component ideal gas mixtures. The ensemble-averaged conservation equations were closed by a K - c model of turbulence. This K--E model of turbulence was modified to account for some of the effects of compressibility, streamline curvature, low- Reynolds number, and preferential stress dissipation. Numerical solutions to the conservation equations were obtained by the highly efficient implicit-factored method of Beam and Warming. The grid system needed to obtain solutions were generated by an algebraic grid generation technique based on transfinite inter- polation. Results o f the numerical study are presented in graphical form illustrating the flow patterns during intake, compression, gaseous fuel injection, expansion, and exhaust.

    20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of pages 22. Price'

    Unclassified

    Rotary engine; Flowfleld; Two-dimensional simulation

    Unclassified - unlimited STAR Category 02

    ,