Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY OFFICE
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Dr. Linda Habash Krause
NASA/MSFC, ZP13 [email protected]
SHEILDS CONFERENCE
7 April 2016
A Tutorial on Spacecraft Charging
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
ENERGETIC PARTICLES
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION
SOLAR WIND
MAGNETOSPHERE
POLAR CUSP
SPACE WEATHER: Processes associated with the temporal and spatial variability in the Solar-Terrestrial Environment
SPACE CLIMATE: Statistical Description of the Solar-Terrestrial Environment parameterized by solar and geomagnetic activity type and intensity
SPACE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: Effects of the space environment on man-made systems (e.g., impulsive disruptions, long-term degradation, etc.)
Motivation: Solar-Terrestrial Interactions
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
3
Motivation: Radiation Effects on Space Systems
• Electrostatic Discharge (ESD)
• Circuit Damage
• Reduce Solar Panel Efficiency
• Material degradation
• Contamination of sensitive optics
• Interference with scientific measurements
Spacecraft (S/C) Charging Effects:
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Intro: The Concept of “Ground”
Lucky!
Unlucky!
REALLY Unlucky! (An argument for polarized plugs!)
Electronics Case (Conductive) “Ground” on Earth:
An arbitrary (but consistent) designation of an electric potential = 0
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Hard-wired grounding of electrical case: Safe!!
We like ground points in our circuit. • Important for safety • “Absolute” voltage
reference for circuit components
• Can serve as a current sink • Reminds us of best
practices (e.g. avoiding ground loops)
“Ground” on Earth: Don’t take that third prong for granted!
Intro: The Concept of “Ground”
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Intro: There is no “ground” in space!
How do we characterize “Spacecraft Charging”?
Conundrum: There is no “ground” in space!
Definitions: Charging is a voltage relative to some reference potential Spacecraft frame charging is commonly referenced to the ambient space plasma potential Differential surface charging commonly describes the voltage between an electrically-insulated component and the s/c frame
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Fundamentals: Space, Plasma, and Frame Potentials
Vacuum Space Potential
Plasma Potential
Debye Length: a function of ambient plasma (electron) temperature and density
Vf
In Vacuum: Space Potential è 0 as r è∞ In Plasma: Local Plasma Potential is referenced off of space potential as r è∞ Convention: Let Plasma Potential == 0
Frame Potential
Referenced off of Plasma Potential
We commonly use “space” and “plasma” potentials interchangably
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Example: Satellite with Langmuir Probe
Characteristic I-V Langmuir Probe Curve CUBESTAR from U. of Oslo http://cubestar.no/
Langmuir probes provide:
• Plasma electron and ion density and temp
• S/C potential
• Plasma Potential
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
To derive the equation for the potential of a stationary, passive conducting object: balance the electron and ion fluxes & assume the election and ion temperatures are the same
Ø Mean speed of the particles in a plasma is given by Ø u = mean speed Ø α = species (electron or ion) Ø k = Boltzmann’s constant Ø T = temperature
α
αα πm
kTuo8
, =
Ø Flux (particles per unit area per unit time crossing a surface) is given by
Ø The electron density is given by ⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ Φ=
eoe kT
enn exp4,aooun=Γα
(This represents the electron density at the surface of a conducting object charged to Φ. In a space plasma, Φ will be negative, so ne will be less than the ambient plasma density no)
Ø Electron flux = ion flux
Ø Assume the electron & ion temperatures are the same i
e
mm
kTe
=⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛ Φexp
i
io
e
e
eo m
kTnmkT
kTen
ππ88exp =⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛ Φ
THEORY: S/C Surface Charging Calculation
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
n Solve for potential, Φ
n In an oxygen plasma (near earth),
⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛=Φi
e
mm
ekT ln
VekT 110 −≈⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛−≈Φ For thermal ionosphere plasma
temp = 0.1 eV
Satellite Surface Charging
QUESTION: OK, in LEO the spacecraft might charge up to -1V, but… who cares about that? ANSWER: This charging is due to ambient thermal ionospheric plasma, but it becomes more complicated when higher energy electrons are in the environment.
THEORY: S/C Surface Charging
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
REFLECTED
BACK-SCATTERED ELECTRONS
Vf
INCIDENT ELECTRONS INCIDENT IONS SOLAR UV PHOTONS
PHOTO-ELECTRONS
PLASMA SHEATH “BOUNDARY”
SURFACE CHARGING
DIELECTRIC (INSULATING) MATERIAL
SPACECRAFT FRAME (CONDUCTIVE) MATERIAL
DEEP DIELECTRIC CHARGING
ISOLATED CONDUCTOR
CONDUCTION
Vd Vc
SECONDARY ELECTRONS
Different types of S/C Surface Charging
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Spacecraft Charging Calculation
Why modeling spacecraft charging is difficult:
Currents depend on potentials & fields
Capacitive timescales vary by orders of magnitude
Geometrical details are important
Differential charging barriers limit secondary electrons
Contributions from incident charged particles and resulting secondary, backscattered, and photo electrons
conductionphotoibackscatenet jjjjjjj +++++== secσ!
Capacitance of insulating surface to chassis is much greater than capacitance of insulating surface to plasma
Fundamentals: Current Sources to S/C
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
GEO Environment
12
06
00
18
ELECTRONS PROTONS
Magnetic Storm ⇒ Particle injection into the ring current
Ø Ring Current is westward Ø Particles energized as they approach Earth Ø Energetic Electrons injected into post-midnight
Ø Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) is located at 6.6 RE
Ø Popular orbit for low-latitude communication satellites
GEO S/C Surface Charging
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
INTELLSAT IVINTELLSAT IIIDSCS IIDSP
Operational Anomalies
Satellite ChargingProbability
Sunlit
12131415
16
17
18
19
20
2122
23 0 1 23
4
5
6
7
89
1011
Satellite Surface Charging
Ø Injection of energetic (E ~ 10s keV) electrons into GEO concentrated in post-midnight region Ø Statistics show both S/C charging and operational anomalies are concentrated in the same local time sector
Satellite charging probability is compared with operational anomalies, both plotted as a function of spacecraft local time. Each circular ring represents 5% probability of DSCS-III charging to at least -50 V relative to the background plasma (see Habash Krause, 2000). Anomalies are from Jursa, 1985.
S/C Charging Concentrated Post-Midnight
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Electrons in the GEO Environment
1.E-051.E-041.E-031.E-021.E-011.E+001.E+011.E+021.E+03
1.E+00 1.E+01 1.E+02 1.E+03 1.E+04 1.E+05 1.E+06
Energy (eV)
Dis
tribu
tion
Func
tion
(s /
m )
QuietActive
36
During periods of significant geomagnetic activity, the electron environment in GEO is best represented by a two-temperature Maxwellian. See Mullen et al., 1986, for further information. Surface Charging Electrons tend to have energies from 10-50 keV.
Magnetosphere: Geosynchronous Earth Orbit (GEO) Environment
S/C Surface Charging Electrons: 10’s of keV
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Satellite Surface Charging
During periods of significant ring current injection, spacecraft may become significantly charged relative to background plasma. Electron counts are integrated over 20keV-50keV. We use “ion peak” method to determine frame potential Vf
Charging Peak I o n
E n e
r g y (
k e V )
10 1
10 0
10 -1
E l e c
. C t s .
1400 1200 1000
800 600 400 200
0 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000 70000 80000
UT (sec)
L o g F l u x ( # / c m / s / e V ) 2
7
6
5
7000 5000 3000 1000 0
S P M V o l t a g e ( V )
EXAMPLE: DSCS III Charging
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
8 April 2016
Ø Xe plasma thrusters have been used for differential charging neutralization based on “alarm” system
Ø Complex combination of frame and differential component charging mandate delicacy in neutralization.
Ø Using pure electron source to reduce negative frame charging may exacerbate differential charging
Satellite Charging Alarms and Mitigation
Differential Surface Charging & Charge Control
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
(a) (b) (c)
(d) (e) (f)
× × ×
×××
Formation of saddle point as evident from the sequence of spatial potential maps in time. Panels (a) through (f) correspond to 1.0, 5.0, 25, 100, 200, and 300 seconds, respectively.
Demonstration of bootstrap charging of a Kapton patch electrically floating relative to a blanketed frame fixed at -1000 V relative to a background quiescent plasma. The patch face is sunlit.
“Bootstrap Charging” Sheath formation of small isolated patch results in suppression of photo-electron escape from neighboring surfaces
S/C “Bootstrap” Charging
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
MLI-Blanketed Frame(fixed initial φo=-1000V)
Kapton Patch(initial φo=0V)
Virtual Convex Lens
Before the formation of the virtual cathode in front of the Kapton patch, initially at a zero potential relative to the plasma, the approximately concentric semi-circles forms a virtual convex lens that guides incoming charging electrons toward the patch, resulting in rapid patch charging.
MLI-Blanketed Frame(fixed initial φo=-1000V)
Kapton Patch(final φf=-180V)
Virtual Concave Lens
Virtual Cathode
Strong saddle point configuration of spatial equipotentials results in electron optics resembling a concave lens. Divergent trajectories of electrons result in replusion of charging electrons away from the Kapton patch.
Formation of “Virtual Cathode”
Charged Patches: Electrostatic Lenses
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Patch Potential
-160
-140
-120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Time (s)
Pote
ntia
l (V) Voltage
Exponential Curve Fit
Potential of a sunlit Kapton patch as a function of time, when the blanketed satellite frame was fixed at -1000 V. An exponential curve was fit to the data, indicating behavior similar to that of an RC equivalent circuit.
Charging Current to Kapton Patch
-2.50E-10
-2.00E-10
-1.50E-10
-1.00E-10
-5.00E-11
0.00E+00
5.00E-11
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Time (s)
Cha
rgin
g cu
rren
t (A
)
NASCAP resultsExpontential Fit
Charging current to Kapton patch as a function of time. The blanketed satellite frame was fixed at -1000 V. An exponential curve was fit to the data, indicating behavior similar to that of an RC equivalent circuit.
Isolated Patch charging acts like RC Circuit
Differential Charging Characteristics
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
Deep Dielectric Charging
(a) High energy electrons and ions bombardment. (b) Formation of deep electron layer. (c) Attraction of slow ions. (d) Anodized discharge. An impact by a high energy ion or meteoroid may trigger a discharge. (From Lai et al., J. Spacecraft & Rockets, 39, 1, 2002.)
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
• Acrylic specimen is irradiated by energetic electrons • Electrons accumulate inside, creating a cloud-like layer
of negative electrical space charge. • As space charge builds, the internal electrical field
increases dramatically. • Eventually, the immense electrical stress overcomes the
dielectric strength of the acrylic, and electrons are ripped off
• Newly-freed electrons also accelerated by the electric field, ionizing even more acrylic molecules
RUNAWAY BREAKDOWN (AKA Discharge)
Possible Results of Deep Dielectric Charging
ESD: Results of Deep Dielectric Charging
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
ESD ART: Possible New Funding Source
S/C CHARGING SHIELDS 2016
SUMMARY
• The Spacecraft Charging Problem is a complex system of engineering and science (e.g. “What is ground?”)
• Spacecraft charging comes in three basic forms: Surface frame, Surface differential, and Deep Dielectric.
• The surface charging electrons range in energy from 20 keV to 50 keV
• These electrons are most prevalent in GEO in the post-midnight sector
• Deep dielectric charging can result in static buildup of charge on surfaces of internal s/c components, such as cables and circuit components
• Surface charging mitigation is proven to be effective
• Deep dielectric charge mitigation remains to be a challenge
*** THANK YOU ***