A Tryst With Truth

8/9/2019 A Tryst With Truth

1/9

A TRYST WITH

TRUTHPresented by:-

Abhishek Meka

Shailesh Dornala

Amita Jatla

Kishori Gidde Ganesh Sakpal

Sudhir Yadav


2/9

SynopsisNational n!ineerin! is a lar!e publi" se"tor "ompany

manu#a"turin! ele"tri"al !oods$

%orporate o&"e is lo"ated in the 'ndustrial Suburb o#

(ombay$'t has )i#teen *e!ional Sales + Distribution ,nits a"ross

'ndia$

Mr$ * $(hatia the %hairman o# the %ompany$

a"h re!ional unit headed by re!ional dire"tor$

Mr$ S$ Saminathan the *e!ional Dire"tor o# the%ompany.s (elana!ar unit$

Mr$ N$ Gopal as the "hie# Auditor o# (elana!ar unit$


3/9

/hat do you think are the probablereasons #or Saminathan.s )re0uently

hostile stan"e toards Gopal1 2he Personal e0uation beteen Gopal +

Saminathan ere3 hoever3 #ar #rom "ordial$

Saminathan.s adverse remarks had led Gopal to

miss his ell deserved promotion the previous year$

)or some ine4pli"able reason3 Saminathan.sstan"e toards Gopal as )re0uently 5ostile3 andalthou!h the latter as knon to be an upri!ht and

trustorthy o&"er$5is dire"tors in the internal Audit department

invariably #ound in Saminathan a sympatheti" ear$


4/9

/hat are your "omments on the a"tion taken by sta6union1 /hat a"tion the "orporate personal dire"tor

should take re!ardin! the sta6 union1

2he Step hi"h as taken by sta6 union asinappropriate$

2hey shouldn.t "ome to "on"lusion be#oreinvesti!ation


5/9

/hy did Gopal7 Not pay Saminathan ba"k in

his on "oin174plain your anser1Mr$ Gopal did not allo interpersonal relations to distort his 8ud!ment in the #a"e o# eviden"e available ith him

Mr$ S Saminathan had not in #a"t 9outed any rule or norm in!rantin! approval #or pur"hases #rom AK/ %ompany$

National n!ineerin! and AK/ had orked like sister "on"ern inthe past also

Mr$ Gopal had been a vi"tim o# the a"tions taken by Mr SSaminathan

Mr 2 Prasad a senior as interested in the promotion to the

hi!her post$

Mr$ Gopal as not illin! to "ompromise his pro#essionalper#e"tion$

Mr S Saminathan as not involved in any ron! doin! hen"eMr Gopal did not pay ba"k in the same "oin$


6/9

'# you ere in Gopal.s Position3 /hat

a"tion ould you have taken1/e do the same a"tion $ /e totally a!ree

ith the Gopal pro#essional and truth#ul

de"ision$5onest de"ision 'nno"ent 8ob and his

"areer$

/ron! "omments or de"ision are !ives

short time su""ess in the li#e


7/9

Su""ess is not the Aim o# li#e3Per#e"tionis7$ Do you a!ree ith thestatement1 Justi#y the Anser$

/e a!reed to the statement that su""ess is notthe aim o# li#e per#e"tion is7 '# e do the orkper#e"tly and truly it ill possibly !ives the path#or su""ess *atan 2ata is one o# the !ood e4ample

#or his per#e"tion honesty and hardork #or hispath #or su""ess#ul "ompanies su""ess$


8/9

/hy did Gopal #eel happy a#ter submittin! his Audit

*eport about Saminathan1

A#ter submittin! his Audit report Gopal as#eelin! happy #or his true "omments in the

report$Gopal 2rust his Pro#essional "ompeten"e

and inte!rity$ 5e have never anted totake any undue advanta!e and make other

inno"ent person in trouble$5is %omments are very "ru"ial #or !ivin!

de"ision to Saminathan "ase$

;ookin! the same he !ave proper true"omments in this "ase$


9/9

Documents

A Tryst With Truth