A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    1/18

    A to Z

    ORTHODONTICS

    Volume: 12

    Dr. Mohammad Khursheed AlamBDS, PGT, PhD (Japan)

    ORTHOPEDIC

    APPLIANCES

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    2/18

    First Published August 2012

    Dr. Mohammad Khursheed Alam

    All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced stored in a retrieval system,

    or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording orotherwise, without prior permission of author/s or publisher.

    ISBN: 978-967-0486-01-7

    Correspondance:

    Dr. Mohammad Khursheed Alam

    Senior Lecturer

    Orthodontic Unit

    School of Dental Science

    Health Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Email:

    [email protected]

    [email protected]

    Published by:

    PPSP Publication

    Jabatan Pendidikan Perubatan, Pusat Pengajian Sains Perubatan,

    Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Kubang Kerian, 16150. Kota Bharu, Kelatan.

    Published in Malaysia

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    3/18

    Contents

    1. Orthodpedic appliance....................................3-4

    2. Clinical application of orthopedic force......................4-5

    3. Basis of orthopedic appliance...6-8

    4. Types of orthopedic appliance...............................8

    5. Head gear.....................................8-11

    6. Chin cap...................................................................11-12

    7. Face mask................................................................13

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    4/18

    Orthopedic appliance

    According to Sassouni (1972) orthodontic therapy is aimed at the correction

    of dento-alveolar malocclusion, without any skeletal deviation. ie; causes in

    which tooth movement along is derived.

    Whereas orthopedic therapy is aimed at the correction of skeletal

    imbalance with the correction of any dento-alveolar malocclusion being of

    less important in which little or no tooth movement is desire.

    There orthopedic force is heavier (400 gm) when compared to orthodontic

    force (50-100 gm).

    Definition:

    An extra oral heavy force of more than that 400 gm when applied to modify

    bone growth or change the direction of bone growth is called orthopedic

    force. It is generally applied by the help of extra oral anchorage.

    This force may be two types:

    First type:

    Extra oral force to modify or change the direction of the bone growth.

    Example; chin cap (for the correction of open bite or mandibular

    prognathism in the deciduous & mixed dentition).

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    5/18

    Second type:

    Extra oral force for movement of individual teeth. Example; face bow &

    occipital anchorage. The force exerted on each first molar range from the

    300 gm to 900 gm.

    The effect of orthopedic force:

    These forces are interrupted or intermittent forces applied only for about

    1012 hours/ day. The tooth movement tendency is significantly reduced

    since the body restricts the normal circulation for about 12 14 hours / day.

    The total effect on the periosteal sutures & maxillary growth centers is not

    lost; the membranous bone has been restrictive force for about 10 12

    hours / day.

    Clinical application of orthopedic forces:

    A. For class III malocclusions

    1. Chin cap is used restraining the forward growth of mandible.

    2. Case of anterior cross bite, chin cap can be used along with

    removable orthodontic appliance for dental arch.

    3. Reverse pull headgear can be given for the cases with the

    maxillary deficiency.

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    6/18

    4. Class III malocclusion with narrow maxilla, rapid expansion can

    be given for correction of posterior cross bite along with the

    chin cap.

    5. Vertical pull headgear along with chin cap is used to prevent

    vertical growth tendencies & open bite.

    B. For Cleft Palate Patients:

    To correct the maxillo mandibular relations in case of repaired cleft lip

    and clef palate patients.

    C. For case with class II malocclusion:

    1. Cases with II malocclusions associated with maxillary

    prognathisrn can be treated with cervical pull head gear.

    2. A combination of occipital pull and cervical pull can also

    be used to correct the class II malocclusion.

    3. Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrognathism,

    associated with vertical growth pattern can be managed

    with activator & a headgear to control.

    4. High pull headgear is used to restrain the anterior

    maxillary vertical component.

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    7/18

    Basis of orthopedic appliances:

    Orthopedic appliances make use of the teeth as a handle to transmit forces

    to the underlying skeletal structure.

    Forces is excess of 400 gm should be applied to bring favorable skeletal

    change.

    The treatment results depend upon the following:

    1. Amount of force

    2. Duration of force

    3. Direction of force

    4. Age of the patient

    5. Timing of force application

    Amount of force

    The force magnitude should be high i.e, at least greater then 400 gm (40

    600 gm) per side to a maximum total of 2-3 lb to make sure that only

    skeletal & no dental movement take place.

    ** High force produce hyalinization leading undermining resorption which

    prevent tooth movement thus only orthopedic movement seen.

    Increased force decrease blood supply cell death. Produce avascular

    area / hyalinized area. So no tooth movement, bony change occurs.

    Duration of force

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    8/18

    Intermittent force produces skeletal changes where as continuous forces

    produce dental movement. Extra oral appliances should be worn for about

    12 14 hours / days to bring the desire effect. Increasing he duration

    beyond the optimum range increases the dental effects.

    An intermittent heavy force is less harmful to the teeth & periodontium than

    a continuous heavy force. Eg, headgear, chin cap, face mask.

    Direction of force

    The direction of force application should be such as to maximize the

    skeletal effect. A favorable skeletal affect seen when a force is directed

    posteriorly & superiorly through the center of resistance of the maxilla.

    Age of the patient

    Orthopedic appliances are most effective during the mixed dentition. Period

    as it takes advantage of the prepubertal growth pattern/ spurt. However

    treatment should be maintain till growth is completed as these appliances

    changes only the expression of growth & not the underlying growth pattern,

    which may later reassert.

    Timing of force application:

    There is evidence that an increase in the releases of growth hormones

    (name of hormone) more during the evening & night & is associated with

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    9/18

    the sleep onset. Therefore it is advisable for the child to wear headgear in

    the evening & throughout the night. Appliance use time 12 16 hours / day.

    Types of orthopedic appliances:

    1. Headgear

    2. Chin cap

    3. Face mask

    Headgear

    The most common among all e horizontal orthopedic appliances. They are

    ideally indicated in patient with excessive horizontal growth of the maxilla

    with or without vertical changes along with some protrusion of the maxillary

    teeth reasonable good mandibular dental & skeletal morphology. They are

    most effective in the pre pubertal period. It can also be used to distalize the

    maxillary dentition along with the maxilla. They are an important adjunct to

    gain or maintain anchorage (reciprocal anchorage).

    Component of orthopedic appliances:

    1. Force delivering unit (face bow- upper jaw, j hook- lower jaw)

    2. Force generating unit (elastic)

    3. Anchor unit (head cap, neck strap)

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    10/18

    Force delivering unit Face bow

    One of the most important components, which help in delivering extra oral

    force to the posterior teeth.

    The face bow consists of:

    1. Outer bow

    2. Inner bow

    3. J unction

    1. Outer bow :

    It is made of ss wire of 0.051 or 0.062 in dimension &

    Contoured around the face. It may be short, median & long.

    1. Short: Outer bow short than inner bow.

    2. Median: Outer bow same length as the short inner bow.

    3. Long: Outer bow is longer than inner bow.

    2. Inner bow :

    It is made of 0.045 or 0.052 round ss wire & insert the around

    buccal tube on the maxillary 1st molar. The inner bow is adapted

    according to shape of the arch. Stops in the form of U loop, bayonet

    bends, & friction stops are placed in the bow mesial to the buccal

    tube to prevent it from sliding too force far distally through the tube.

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    11/18

    1

    3. Junction :

    It is the point of attachment of inner bow & outer bow, which may be

    soldered or welded. It is usually positioned at the middle of the two

    bows.

    Force generating unit :

    This connects the face bow to the anchor unit & delivers the force to

    the teeth & underlying skeletal structures. The force elements may be

    springs or elastics. Springs are preferred as they provide a constant force,

    where as elastics undergo force decay.

    Anchor unit :

    This is the form of a head cap or neck strap, which use of anchorage

    from the skull or back of the neck respectively.

    A combination of the two may be used. Occipital, parital bone used

    as anchor unit.

    They can be divided as follows:

    1. According to direction of force:

    a. Distal force

    b. Mesial force

    2. According to location of anchor unit:

    a. Cervical-pull headgear

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    12/18

    1

    b. Occipital-pull headgear

    c. High-pull headgear (parietal)

    d. Reverse-pull headgear, eg-incase of class III treatment.

    Chin cap:

    It is an extra oral orthopedic device which is useful in the treatment of class

    III malocclusions that occur due to a protrusive mandible but a relatively

    normal maxilla. Chin cap therapy attests to retard or redirect the growth of

    the mandible in order to obtain a better anterior posterior relation between

    the two jaws.

    Philosophy of chin therapy:

    Mandible grows by apposition of bone at the condyle & along its free

    posterior border. Condyle is not a growth center & condyle growth is largely

    a response to translation of surround tissues. This contemporary offers a

    more optimistic view of the possibilities for growth restraint of the mandible,

    as with the chin therapy.

    Magnitude of force:

    Most authors recommended a force of 300-600 gm/side. Initially, a lower

    force level (about 150gm) may be advised for the patient to get used to the

    appliances.

    Duration of wear:

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    13/18

    1

    A maximum of 12-14 hour/day of chin cap wear is recommended at

    evening & night due to releasing of growth hormone.

    Effects of chin cap:

    1. Redirected of mandibular growth in a downward & backward

    direction.

    2. Remodeling of the mandible & decrease in mandibular plane angle &

    gonial angle.

    3. Lingual tipping of lower incisors.

    4. Improvement in/ of skeletal & soft tissue profile.

    Types of chin cap:

    1. Occipital pull:

    This chin cap derives anchorage from the occipital region. This is

    used in class III cases with mild to moderate prognathism, who can

    bring their incisors in an edge to edge position at centric relation.

    Patient with short anterior facial height benefited from this type of chin

    cap. This is the more commonly used of chin cap.

    Vertical pull:

    This chin cap derives anchorage from the parietal region. It is

    indicated in high angle cases or long force patients as it helps to

    close the angle of the mandible & increase posterior facial height.

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    14/18

    1

    Face mask (Reverse-pull headgear, Protraction headgear, Face

    frame)

    Extraoral appliance that utilizes rests on the chin and forehead (and

    occasionally the cheek bones) as anchorage for elastic traction, with the

    purpose of orthopedically protracting the maxilla. This maxillary protraction

    is performed as an early treatment modality in Class III malocclusions

    associated with maxillary hypoplasia. The face mask also can be used as

    an orthodontic appliance, to provide extraoral anchorage for protraction of

    posterior teeth. Usual side effects of face mask treatment include

    elongation of the face (caused by extrusion of the teeth to which the elastic

    traction is applied) and proclination of the maxillary incisors, when the

    traction is applied to the maxilla. The appliance was designed by J . Delaire

    and subsequently modified by H. Petit and others.

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    15/18

    1

    Bibilography:

    1. Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics The art and science. 4th edition. 2009

    2. Gurkeerat Singh. Textbook of orthodontics. 2nd edition. Jaypee, 2007

    3. Houston S and Tulley, Textbook of Orthodontics. 2nd Edition. Wright, 1992.

    4. Iida J. Lecture/class notes. Professor and chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics, School of dental

    science, Hokkaido University, Japan.

    5. Lamiya C. Lecture/class notes. Ex Associate Professor and chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics,

    Sapporo Dental College.

    6. Laura M. An introduction to Orthodontics. 2nd edition. Oxford University Press, 2001

    7. McNamara JA, Brudon, WI. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 1st edition, Needham

    Press, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2001

    8. Mitchel. L. An Introduction to Orthodontics. 3 editions. Oxford University Press. 2007

    9. Mohammad EH. Essentials of Orthodontics for dental students. 3rd edition, 2002

    10.Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th edition, Mosby Inc., St.Louis,

    MO, USA, 2007

    11.Sarver DM, Proffit WR. In TM Graber et al., eds., Orthodontics: Current Principles and

    Techniques, 4th ed., St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby, 2005

    12.Samir E. Bishara. Textbook of Orthodontics. Saunders 978-0721682891, 2002

    13.T. M. Graber, R.L. Vanarsdall, Orthodontics, Current Principles and Techniques, "Diagnosis and

    Treatment Planning in Orthodontics", D. M. Sarver, W.R. Proffit, J. L. Ackerman, Mosby, 2000

    14.Thomas M. Graber, Katherine W. L. Vig, Robert L. Vanarsdall Jr. Orthodontics: Current Principles

    and Techniques. Mosby 9780323026215, 2005

    15.William R. Proffit, Raymond P. White, David M. Sarver. Contemporary treatment of dentofacial

    deformity. Mosby 978-0323016971, 2002

    16.William R. Proffit, Henry W. Fields, and David M. Sarver. Contemporary Orthodontics. Mosby

    978-0323040464, 2006

    17.Yoshiaki S. Lecture/class notes. Associate Professor and chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics, School

    of dental science, Hokkaido University, Japan.

    18.Zakir H. Lecture/class notes. Professor and chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics, Dhaka Dental

    College and hospital.

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    16/18

    1

    Dedicated To

    My Mom, Zubaida Shaheen

    My Dad, Md. Islam

    &

    My Only Son

    Mohammad Sharjil

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    17/18

    1

    Acknowledgments

    I wish to acknowledge the expertise and efforts of the various

    teachers for their help and inspiration:

    1. Prof. Iida Junichiro Chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics,

    Hokkaido University, Japan.

    2. Asso. Prof. Sato yoshiaki Dept. of Orthodontics, Hokkaido

    University, Japan.

    3. Asst. Prof. Kajii Takashi Dept. of Orthodontics, Hokkaido

    University, Japan.

    4. Asst. Prof. Yamamoto Dept. of Orthodontics, Hokkaido

    University, Japan.

    5. Asst. Prof. Kaneko Dept. of Orthodontics, Hokkaido

    University, Japan.

    6. Asst. Prof. Kusakabe Dept. of Orthodontics, Hokkaido

    University, Japan.

    7. Asst. Prof. Yamagata Dept. of Orthodontics, Hokkaido

    University, Japan.

    8. Prof. Amirul Islam Principal, Bangladesh Dental college9. Prof. Emadul Haq Principal City Dental college

    10. Prof. Zakir Hossain Chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics,Dhaka Dental College.11. Asso. Prof. Lamiya Chowdhury Chairman, Dept. of

    Orthodontics, Sapporo Dental College, Dhaka.

    12. Late. Asso. Prof. Begum Rokeya Dhaka Dental College.13. Asso. Prof. MA Sikder Chairman, Dept. of Orthodontics,

    University Dental College, Dhaka.

    14. Asso. Prof. Md. Saifuddin Chinu Chairman, Dept. ofOrthodontics, Pioneer Dental College, Dhaka.

  • 7/27/2019 A to z Orthodontics Vol 12 Orthopedic Appliances

    18/18

    Dr. Mohammad Khursheed Alamhas obtained his PhD degree in Orthodontics from Japan in 2008.

    He worked as Asst. Professor and Head, Orthodontics

    department, Bangladesh Dental College for 3 years. At the sametime he worked as consultant Orthodontist in the Dental office

    named Sapporo Dental square. Since then he has worked in

    several international projects in the field of Orthodontics. He is

    the author of more than 50 articles published in reputed journals.

    He is now working as Senior lecturer in Orthodontic unit, School

    of Dental Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Volume of this Book has been reviewed by:

    Dr. Kathiravan Purmal

    BDS (Malaya), DGDP (UK), MFDSRCS (London), MOrth

    (Malaya), MOrth RCS( Edin), FRACPS.

    School of Dental Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Dr Kathiravan Purmal graduated from University Malaya 1993.

    He has been in private practice for almost 20 years.

    He is the first locally trained orthodontist in Malaysia withinternational qualification. He has undergone extensive

    training in the field of oral and maxillofacial surgery and

    general dentistry.