22
A TALE OF TWO METHODS: COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE LEARNING National Institute on the Assessment of Adult Learning 2011: Virtual Assessment. Real Outcomes. Yuerong Sweetland, PhD – Director of Assessment , Yuerong Sweetland, PhD – Director of Assessment , Franklin University Franklin University

A Tale of Two Methods: comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

  • Upload
    dylan

  • View
    45

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Tale of Two Methods: comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning. National Institute on the Assessment of Adult Learning 2011: Virtual Assessment. Real Outcomes. Yuerong Sweetland , PhD – Director of Assessment , Franklin University. Presentation Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

A TALE OF TWO METHODS: COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF FACE-TO-FACE AND ONLINE LEARNING

National Institute on the Assessment of Adult Learning 2011: Virtual

Assessment. Real Outcomes.

Yuerong Sweetland, PhD – Director of Assessment , Franklin UniversityYuerong Sweetland, PhD – Director of Assessment , Franklin University

Page 2: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Presentation Overview Institutional Context and Background Assessment Model and Process Case Studies Closing the Loop Questions & Answers

Page 3: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Background (1) Founded in 1902 as the YMCA School of

Commerce Accrediting bodies: HLC and IACBE Adult students

Undergraduate Average Age: 33 Graduate Average Age: 35

Page 4: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Background (2) First online courses offered 1998 As of Fall 2010, Franklin

Offers 28 undergraduate majors & 4 graduate majors, available both f2f and online

More than 11,000 students enrolled annually

Multiple Locations: Domestic and International

Page 5: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Online vs. F2F Trend (1)

Page 6: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Education Philosophy

Ensuring academic quality Providing access to educational

opportunities Adapting to the needs of students Responding to changes in society,

professions, and the business community

Page 7: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Academic Model Centralized academic model Curriculum development: Team-based

approach Fulltime faculty Design faculty Content contributor Adjunct

Page 8: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Cascading Systems of Outcomes

Page 9: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Assessment

Assessment - the “systemic collection, review and use of information about academic programs for improving student learning and development.”

Each Academic Program has an Assessment Plan, which identifies outcomes, assessment methods, and implementation schedules

Page 10: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Assessment: Key Elements Multi-faceted assessment model Strong linkages between assessment

and curriculum re-design Streamlined process Transparency to all stakeholders

Page 11: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Multi-faceted Assessment Model Direct

Capstone projects Selected course projects/assignments E-Portfolios Locally designed exams in capstone/other courses Nationally normed exams (Proficiency Profile, MFT)

Indirect Current student survey Graduating student survey Alumni survey NSSE Grades

Page 12: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Assessment Process

Page 13: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Assessment Artifacts Collection

https://dropbox.franklin.edu/dropboxasmt/login.jsp

Page 14: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Assessment DropBox Interface

Page 15: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Examples: Direct Assessment (Undergraduate)

Page 16: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Examples: Direct Assessment (Undergraduate)

Page 17: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Examples: Indirect Assessment (Undergraduate)

Page 18: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Examples: Indirect Assessment (Undergraduate)

Page 19: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Examples: Indirect Assessment (Undergraduate)

Page 20: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Examples: Indirect Assessment (Graduate)

Page 21: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Closing the Loop….

Major impacts of assessment findings: Curriculum Redesign Informing hiring plans Changes in assessment criteria Changes in assignment requirements,

supporting materials Additional support services provided by

the Student Learning Center

Page 22: A Tale of Two Methods:  comparative Assessment of face-to-face and online learning

Questions or Comments?Dr. Yuerong Sweetland

[email protected]

A Tale of Two Methods:A Tale of Two Methods:Comparative Assessment of Comparative Assessment of

Face-to-face and Online Face-to-face and Online LearningLearning