Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
October 2007 – A Summit – Children Impacted by Paretnal Incarceration – Killington, 500 attendees. Result of the Incarcerated Women’s Initiative (IWI).
November 2008 - A report was prepared for the Agency of Human Services by the Vermont Research entitled Literature and Program Review: Best and Promising Practices for Children of Incarcerated Parents.
January 2009 - Annual Report to the Corrections Oversight Committee - Vermont State Policies Regarding Children of Incarcerated Parents
Fall of 2009 – Father-Child Initiative for Vermont, Northern State Correctional Facility at Newport - Feasibility assessment for establishing a Father-Child program at the Northern State Correctional Facility (NSCF) for men in Newport, VT.
January 2011 – Act 157, Sec. 16 - Inmates Who Are Parents; Children, Families and Contact Policies.
To develop a survey tool and method for surveying
inmates about their children and families, and the impact
of their incarceration on them.
To collect and analyze data on inmates, and
families/children, contact visitation and cross-tabulate for
significant relationships
Individuals interviewed 4-8 months after their release
cited “family support” as the most important factor in
helping them stay out of prison
o (Source: Family Justice Program, Why Ask About Family)
Outcomes for children of inmates much improved by
contact/relationship with parents while incarcerated
o (Source: Annie E. Casey Foundation)
19 or
younger
8.70%
20-24
22.20%
25-29
21.90% 30-34
15.30%
35-39
10.30%
40 +
21.60%
Vermont Age
19 or
Younge
r
1.50%
20-24
12.40
%
25-29
16.40
%
30-34
16.60
%
35-39
13.80
%
40 +
39.30
%
National Age
55.4%
7.8%
28.7%
75.0%
16.3%
39.5%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
Parent or loved one
incarcerated
Mother incarcerated Father incarcerated
Males
Females
Parent Incarcerated Avg Age at Inmates’ First
Incarceration
Yes 21.5
No 26.4
• parent incarcerated as a juvenile leads to significantly earlier entrance into
prison
• In addition, parent incarceration hurts educational attainment
23.50%
14.80%
5.00%
24.30%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
Foster Care Homeless CHINS Juvenile Facility
14%
23%
25% 25%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Homeless Foster Care
Male
Female
11.8%
19.6% 20.8%
28.7%
21.7%
43.5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Homeless Foster Care
0 parent incarcerated
1 parent incarcerated
2 parents incarcerated
77.6%
91.9%
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
Receive Money for Commissary Very/Mostly Supportive
64.1% of Vermont
inmates interviewed have
children under 18
Estimated 7,767 children
had incarcerated parents
in 2012 in VT
Inmates
With Children Without Children
64.1%
8.20%
32.50%
38.10%
21.10%
UNDER 2 AGES 2 -5 AGES 6 -12 AGES 13-17
Child lives with
other parent
VT Avg. Nat’l Avg.
Male Inmate 83.5% 89.6%
Female Inmate 32% 28%
Source: Christopher J. Mumola, Incarcerated Parents and Their Children
(Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ
182335, 2000).
4.6%
32.2%
24.3%
15.4%
23.6% Probate Court
Family Court
Informal Agreement
Inmate has custody
50/50
Parental rights
terminated
Male Inmates Female Inmates
Ever
7.5% 13.6%
During
Incarceration
3% 6.8%
o
67.8% of Vermont Inmates reported their important people
live 1 hour or more away from their current facility
Family /important people
distance from facility
VT Inmates’ families
1-2 hrs away 27.7%
2.5-5 hrs away 24. 3%
5-10 hrs away 9.2%
>10 hrs away 6.6%
2/3 of inmates’ children do not visit them in prison
64.8% 16.8%
10.3%
8.1%
Always
Often
Rarely
Never
11.10%
3%
7.70% 6% 5.60%
1.20%
65.40%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
A few times a
year
Several times a
year
About once a
month
Two or three
times a month
Weekly More than
weekly
No Visits
Children’s Frequency of Visitation with their Parent
22.2%
45.5%
38.7%
24.1%
58.3%
70.0%
23.5%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Chittenden
Regional
Correctional
Facility,
South
Burlington
Marble
Valley
Regional
Correctional
Facility,
Rutland
Northeast
Correctional
Complex, St.
Johnsbury
Northern
State
Correctional
Facility,
Newport
Northwest
State
Correctional
Facility,
Swanton
Southeast
State
Correctional
Facility,
Windsor
Southern
State
Correctional
Facility,
Springfield
12%
49% 52%
89%
45% 39%
0% 6%
10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3 Months or
Less
4 To 12
Months
13 Months or
More
The amount of visitation hasdecreased
The amount of visitations hasremained the same
The amount of visitation hasincreased
Frequency of Visitation with Children
Length of Incarceration So Far
97% of inmates with children expect to have
visits with their children when they are released
o 28.2% of inmates expect to live with their child or children when
they are released
o But, only 1/3 of children visit their parent while
incarcerated
Received Visits
Had Phone Contact
Had Written Contact
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Frequency of visits for the entire population
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Not At All A Few Times
per Year
Several Times
per Year
Monthly Two or Three
Times per
Month
Weekly More Than
Weekly
38% of inmates do not receive visitors
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Chittenden Marble
Valley
Northeast Northern Northwest Southeast Southern
Monthly or Less More Than Monthly
Male
Male
Female
Female
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Monthly or Less More Than Monthly
Frequency of Visits
33.3%
13.3%
27.1% 32.1%
23.5%
50.0% 52.7%
81.3%
42.2%
59.3%
63.2%
58.8%
65.6% 68.9%
Chittenden Marble Northeast Northern Northwest Southeast Southern
Visits with parents
Phone calls with parents
93% of inmates have phone contact with important people
Frequency of phone contact for the entire population:
0%5%
10%15%20%25%30%35%40%45%50%
Not At All A Few
Times per
Year
Several
Times per
Year
About
Once per
Month
Two Or
Three
Times per
Month
Weekly Several
Times per
Week
Daily
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Chittenden Marble
Valley
Northeast Northern Northwest Southeast Southern
Monthly or Less More Than Monthly
74.8% of inmates claim that the visiting schedules do
not work for their important people because they are
too far away from their families
0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%
Visiting
Schedule
and
Distance
Distance Visitation
Schedule
No
Distance
or
Schedule
Barriers
Family Not Notified of Relocation
Phone Contact
o Cost
o Lack of privacy
Visitation Policy
o Schedule of visits
o # of visitors allowed
o Not a good environment for children
o ID/Dress/Screening process
Incarceration affects the entire family
Contact with family members:
o reduces recidivism/parole violations
o Improves successful reintegration into society
o increases the chance for successful family
reunification
o reduces the stress of separation
o encourages positive behaviors in inmates
• Decreases aggressive behavior
2/3 of inmates’ children do not visit them in prison
DOC policies are seen as obstacles to visitation and contact
Distance is barrier that can be addressed via remote access
Family contact is beneficial for:
o Inmates’ behavior & motivation
o Children’s outcomes
o Successful family reunification
o Recidivism reduction tool