Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A successful team – a successful program
Peter Roggekamp
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
2
How many really successful
market – development programs
do you know?.....
….Really?
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
3
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
4
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
Conclusion
Successful programs fully embrace
the complex socio-economic reality !
5Last slide
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
Flexibility: * find your relevance, re-develop your offer
* learn and change ….. or fail
* right ..national experts
* ..structures
* ..management
* ..organizational culture
6
Team:
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
7
Wh
ich is th
e o
dd
on
e o
ut?
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
CA
VA
C 2
01
0-2
01
5
FU
LL CIR
CLE
8
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
SYSTEMIC CHANGE
•Fertilizer •Pesticides
•(Irrigation)
• Vegetables
• Media
• Business Enabling Environment
• Agritools
• Seeds and varieties
• Model farmer dry season
• Market infrastructure
• PP dialogue
• Export promotion9
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
10
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
11
Model Summary
Model R R Square Adjusted R
Square
Std. Error of the
Estimate
1 .695a .483 .471 1.17397
Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized
Coefficients
t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 2.891 .171
16.930 .000
Sum P in basal stage .012 .003 .156 3.561 .000
dummy for flooded areas .651 .157 .192 4.135 .000
7.How much area that you
cultivate DSR in total? .000 .000 .087 2.739 .006
D_KPT -.519 .143 -.133 -3.622 .000
D_Kampot -.352 .131 -.098 -2.687 .007
D_varietry_IR504 1.153 .162 .355 7.099 .000
D_varietry_IR85 1.026 .206 .192 4.970 .000
D_varietry_IR66 .723 .241 .107 3.004 .003
Sum N in TL .019 .004 .205 4.444 .000
Sum K in TL .022 .009 .092 2.539 .011
Sum N in PI .018 .005 .173 3.763 .000
Sum K in PI .019 .005 .133 3.429 .001
Total amount of chemical
fertilizer per ha -.003 .001 -.220 -2.828 .005
ΔY = Σ Bx * (Xafter-Xbefore).
ton paddy
Value
m. USD ton paddy
Value
m.USD
Irrigation schemes +++ Very reliable
Very likely for most
schemes123,368 24.7 218,461 43.7
51,763 10.4 10.4 Wet season
32,744 6.5 6.5 Dry season
Other support to model farmers
wet season -
likely
Support to model farmers dry
season±
Indicative /
case studies
Will continue.11,822 2.4
Support to pesticides companies + Potentially plausible
Early, seems already
irreversible. 115,384 23.1
Vegetables - case studies Not sure
Export attribution / displacement
questionable.Not sure
4,518 0.90
Media ± indicative indications
Seeds and varieties not measured Serious doubts
PDA and GDA support not measured Not likely. Certainly had impact
SustainabilityReliability of data
One could argue that
this is a one time impact.
Not measured but will
have impact
Not measured but
will have real
impact
Potentially large impact
Until September 2015 Until December 2017
Table 4: Yearly impact of CAVAC supported activities on increased production.
Support to fertilizer companies
and model farmers on fertilizer ++ Very plausible.
Assured Likely to
be higherWet season
Dry season
12
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
13
www.dropbox.com/login
username:[email protected]
password: DBcavac2015
Analysis
Intervention design
Implementation
Monitoring
14
Complex Socio-Economic Reality
15
Complex Socio-Economic Reality
Learn Implement
Problems Opportunities
Solutions Innovations
Beneficiaries Markets
Analyse Constraints Analyse Incentives
Should Business case
Monitoring Continuous learning
Failure !
16
Complex Socio-Economic Reality
Quiz
17
How many interventions should be successful?
1 2 3At least 75% At least 50% 10-15% should be great
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
18
No failure, but
portfolio
management
Optimize impact
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
19
Fully embrace complexity; No compromise Manage a flexible portfolio for maximum impact
no intermediate targets
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
Th
e te
am
20
Quiz
21
How large should the team be?
1 2 3
10 is enough Two options:
6 to 12
or
30 to 40
Outsource and subcontract,
with a small core team
Quiz
22
Organogram?
1 2 3
As flat as
possible
Middle management
Good for efficiency
Middle management
+ Junior and Senior levels
Good for motivation
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
23
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
24
CAVAC’s answer
25
Organogram?
1 2 3
As flat as
possible
Embrace
complexity
Middle management
Good for efficiency
Middle management
+ Junior and Senior levels
Good for motivation
CAVAC’s answer
26
How large should the team be?
1 2 3
10 is enough Two options:
6 to 12
or
30 to 40
Outsource and subcontract,
with a small core team
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
28
Fully embrace complexity; No compromise Manage a flexible portfolio for maximum impact
no outputs - or intermediate targets
Donors: INVEST in managers! Flat organizational structures work best!
Quiz
29
What is the ideal profile of national experts?
A BEducation High level is essential,
preferably international
Experience is more important
Work
Experience
Important Only capacity is important
Experience can obstruct
Aid experience Very useful Better not
Specialization Mainly generalists Mainly technical specialists
Aspiration Entrepreneur or technical expert Manager
Private sector
background?
PS experience is important Creativity is more important.
CAVAC 2010-2015. Successful teams
30
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s Roles and responsibilities over time
Tasks
Strategic overview
Recruitment
Government and
donor relations
Reports
Strategies
Deal making
Learning
Market analyses
Initial research
National experts
Manager – coach - trainer
Years
CAVAC’s answers
32
What is the ideal profile of national experts?
A BEducation High level is essential,
preferably international
Experience is more important
Work
Experience
Important Only capacity is important
Experience can obstruct
Aid experience Very useful Better not
Specialization Mainly generalists Mainly technical specialists
Aspiration Entrepreneur or technical expert Manager
Private sector
background?
PS experience is important Creativity is more important.
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
33
Clear vision of
success-factors
Exposed to successful
programs
Manager - Coach
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
34
Fully embrace complexity; No compromise Manage a flexible portfolio for maximum impact
no output- or intermediate targets
Donors: INVEST in managers! Flat organizational structures work best!
Hire the young and bright, Build a learning environment
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
35
Success means promotion,
failure means less salary
Very impolite to
be critical
My colleague made a
mistake. I cannot tell that,
I have to be loyal
Can I trust my manager?
Will she change her mind ?
Why would I? Nothing
will change anyhow
A culture of honest reflection
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s
36
Fully embrace complexity; No compromise Manage a flexible portfolio for maximum impact
no output- or intermediate targets
Donors: INVEST in managers! Flat organizational structures work best!
Hire the young and bright, Build a learning environment
Building a culture of learning and critical reflection is very hard, but essential !--You never get it right the first time !!--
CA
VA
C 2
010-
201
5. S
ucc
essf
ul t
eam
s Further reading:
• CAVAC website: .www cavackh.org.
• FAQ on CAVAC’s phase 1 impact• Part 1 and 3 from CAVAC’s completion report• Drop box. username:[email protected]; password: DBcavac2015
• Managers program design paper, 2 years old.