10
“A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler Roger N. Conaway, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

“A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

“A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners”

Albuquerque, New Mexico

Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D.

The University of Texas at Tyler

Roger N. Conaway, Ph.D.

The University of Texas at Tyler

Page 2: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 22

Objectives

To briefly address the dynamic nature of channel choice within organizations

To present the results of a student survey among business practitioners

Page 3: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 33

Rational Choice Theory

Posits that individuals match inherent objective characteristics of media with objective characteristics of task

Individuals make rational choices based on easy of use, perceived benefits, social presence of medium, information richness

Minsky and Marin, JBC,

1999

Page 4: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 44

Social Influence Theory

Choice of media a function of individual perceptions, not just matching task and media

Choice influenced by social relationships, organizational structures, local norms E.g., behavior of co-workers influences choice

Choice also influenced by personal traits, inclinations, demographic factors

Minsky and Marin, JBC, 1999

Page 5: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 55

Survey Assignment

Given to students enrolled in junior-level business communication course

Required assignment (students interviewed executives, managers, or other business practitioners)

Prepared memorandum required based on interview

Page 6: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 66

Ranked Skill as No. 1in Terms of Importance

(and means N=107)

Listening 75% (mean = 1.4)

Speaking 11% (mean = 2.3)

Reading 10% (mean = 3.0)

Writing 4% (mean = 3.3)

Page 7: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 77

Types of Communication Activities

Larry Barker, et al., Journal of

Applied Communication Research, 1981

Page 8: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 88

Importance of Grammarin Business Communication

N=107

Unimportant

0 %

Somewhat Important

12%

Very Important

38%

Absolutely Essential

50%

Page 9: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 99

Mode of CommunicationUsed Most Often

E-mail

17%

Telephone

23%

Memoranda

1%

Letters

1%

Direct Personal Conversation

58%

Page 10: “A Student Analysis of Channel Choice among Business Practitioners” Albuquerque, New Mexico Thomas L. Fernandez, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Tyler

October 22, 2003October 22, 2003 1010

Conclusions