13
A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN MINING AT CHARTERHOUSE, MENDIP, ENGLAND* D. A. McFARLANE† Keck Science Center, The Claremont Colleges, 925 North Mills Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711, USA J. LUNDBERG Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada and H. NEFF Department of Anthropology and Institute for Integrated Research in Materials, Environments, and Societies, California State University Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90840-1003, USA The laser ablation ICP–MS transect of a speleothem from GB Cave, close to Charterhouse, Mendip Hills, UK, records Pb variations over the past 5 ka. The speleothem record correlates well with the known historical record of lead mining in the district, the principal features of which include: the Roman lead mining peak; the Dark Ages cessation; gradual, episodic revival up to the late 16th century peak; the 17th century collapse and subsequent recovery; and the final short-lived burst at the end of the 19th century. This correlation supports the assumption that the pre-Roman lead record also derives from local mining. Thus, this record is the first example of quantifying ancient human mining activity through trace element signature of a speleothem. This record also provides the first solid evidence of significant pre-Roman mining activity in the Charterhouse region, and the first solid dating of that activity. This pre-Roman mining can be divided into three main peaks dated to 1800–1500 BC, 1100–800 BC and 350–0 BC. KEYWORDS: CAVE, MINING, BRONZE AGE, BRITAIN, LEAD, SPELEOTHEM, LASER ABLATION INTRODUCTION The progress and decline of ancient Western civilization was closely attuned to the production of metals, especially silver and lead (Rosman et al. 1997). During the tenure of the Roman Empire, Western European lead production alone amounted to some 80 000–100 000 metric tons per year (Nriagu 1996). Britain was recognized as an important mining region prior to the beginning of the Christian Era, and its production of tin from south-western Britain, and particularly lead from the Mendip Hills, are thought to have been a factor in precipitating the Roman invasion of Britain in ad 43 (Ellis 1992). Nevertheless, the surviving record of the Mendip Roman lead mining industry is sparse, and of its inferred Bronze and Iron age precedents almost non-existent, largely because the landscape is a palimpsest of subsequent mining activity that persisted into the early 20th century. Here, we report a record of mining activity at Charterhouse-on-Mendip that is preserved *Received 4 August 2012; accepted 25 September 2012 †Corresponding author: email [email protected] Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443 doi: 10.1111/arcm.12025 © 2013 University of Oxford

A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMANMINING AT CHARTERHOUSE, MENDIP, ENGLAND*

D. A. McFARLANE†

Keck Science Center, The Claremont Colleges, 925 North Mills Avenue, Claremont, CA 91711, USA

J. LUNDBERG

Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada

and H. NEFF

Department of Anthropology and Institute for Integrated Research in Materials, Environments, and Societies,California State University Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA 90840-1003, USA

The laser ablation ICP–MS transect of a speleothem from GB Cave, close to Charterhouse,Mendip Hills, UK, records Pb variations over the past 5 ka. The speleothem record correlateswell with the known historical record of lead mining in the district, the principal featuresof which include: the Roman lead mining peak; the Dark Ages cessation; gradual, episodicrevival up to the late 16th century peak; the 17th century collapse and subsequent recovery;and the final short-lived burst at the end of the 19th century. This correlation supports theassumption that the pre-Roman lead record also derives from local mining. Thus, this recordis the first example of quantifying ancient human mining activity through trace elementsignature of a speleothem. This record also provides the first solid evidence of significantpre-Roman mining activity in the Charterhouse region, and the first solid dating of thatactivity. This pre-Roman mining can be divided into three main peaks dated to 1800–1500 BC,1100–800 BC and 350–0 BC.

KEYWORDS: CAVE, MINING, BRONZE AGE, BRITAIN, LEAD, SPELEOTHEM,LASER ABLATION

INTRODUCTION

The progress and decline of ancient Western civilization was closely attuned to the production ofmetals, especially silver and lead (Rosman et al. 1997). During the tenure of the Roman Empire,Western European lead production alone amounted to some 80 000–100 000 metric tons per year(Nriagu 1996). Britain was recognized as an important mining region prior to the beginning of theChristian Era, and its production of tin from south-western Britain, and particularly lead from theMendip Hills, are thought to have been a factor in precipitating the Roman invasion of Britain inad 43 (Ellis 1992). Nevertheless, the surviving record of the Mendip Roman lead mining industryis sparse, and of its inferred Bronze and Iron age precedents almost non-existent, largely becausethe landscape is a palimpsest of subsequent mining activity that persisted into the early 20thcentury. Here, we report a record of mining activity at Charterhouse-on-Mendip that is preserved

*Received 4 August 2012; accepted 25 September 2012†Corresponding author: email [email protected]

bs_bs_banner

Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443 doi: 10.1111/arcm.12025

© 2013 University of Oxford

Page 2: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

in a speleothem recovered from an underlying cave system, and which has recorded, but not beenoverwritten by, successive mining episodes.

The Romano-British mining operation at Charterhouse-on-Mendip, Somerset (51.29°N;2.71°W, Fig. 1), has been recognized as one of Britain’s earliest and most important industrialarchaeological sites (Fradley 2009). The site occupies some 27 ha sitting astride the BlackmoorValley/Velvet Bottom drainage, which originates on the limestone/mudstone sequence of theCarboniferous Avon Group before flowing on to the purer Black Rock Limestone, where theintermittent stream sinks into one of a number of karst sinkholes locally called ‘swallets’.Today, the site is notable for its ‘gruffy ground’—a mélange of shallow mining pits, linear miningtrenches called ‘rakes’ and vegetated mining slag dumps. Archaeological evidence includesearthworks dating from the Mesolithic and Iron Age, a small Roman fort, medieval field struc-tures and smelting flues dating from the early 19th century (Fradley 2009).

The geological context of the Charterhouse lead deposits has been described in detail byStanton (1985, 1991), from the fortuitous survival of original material in the natural caveaccessed from Grebe Swallet Mine. The galena was emplaced as thin veins in Neptunian dykesof Liassic Age, and was especially abundant as redeposited pebbles and concretions in muds andsediments infiltrating the underlying limestone. Preferential dissolution of the limestone overgeological timescales then concentrated the lead ore into a surface lag deposit. (Pliny noted thatlead was found ‘at the surface of the ground so abundantly that a law was spontaneously passedto limit production’: Bostock and Riley 1855.) These deposits were linear, approximately hori-zontal and shallow. Presumably, natural erosion by the stream in Blackmoor Valley would haveleft pebbles of galena exposed, where they must have attracted the attention of the local popu-lation. Excavation of Charterhouse Warren Farm Swallet, located 1.5 km south-west of the mainCharterhouse mining area, has yielded human remains dating to 2460–1995 bc (Levitan andSmart 1989), demonstrating a human presence in the immediate area since at least the EarlyBronze Age: extensive evidence of occupation since Palaeolithic times is known from variousMendip sites, notably Gough’s Cave, Cheddar, some 2.5 km distant (Currant et al. 1989; Jacobi2004; Jacobi and Higham 2009).

Although all recent authors have accepted that a substantial pre-Roman lead mining industrymust have existed at Charterhouse (e.g., Ellis 1992; Todd 1996a,b; Fradley 2009), direct evidenceis sparse. A denarius from the reign of Julius Caesar, struck in 48 bc, that was excavated from aCharterhouse mining rake in 1993–5 along with Iron Age pottery sherds is strongly suggestive offirst century bc mining, but not conclusive (Todd 1996a).

Ancient lead mining industries produced substantial local, and even regional, pollution. Orewas washed in local streams, which would have introduced soluble lead compounds intothe local water table. The smelting took place in open wood-fired hearths (Tylecote 1964) andproduced copious emissions of sulphur dioxide and particulate lead (closed smelters withhorizontal stone flues for the recovery of volatile lead and sulphur were not introduced until thelate 18th century: Gough 1967), which were well understood to contaminate grassland andrender it unusable by livestock. On a regional scale, Roman lead smelting between 600 bc andad 300 in Greece and Spain produced enough air pollution to deposit a record in Greenland icecores (Rosman et al. 1997). Total lead production from the Mendip orefield has been crudelyestimated at approximately 100 000 tons (Green 1958). Ancient lead smelting was also ineffi-cient: Roman slags at Charterhouse have been shown to contain 22 1 4.6% lead, roughly onethird of the original ore content. Slag (which in pre-industrial times was primarily oxidizedgalena, rather than the high-temperature silicate slags of later industrial origin) was dumpedimmediately adjacent to the mining operations, whereupon at least some of the galena (PbS)

432 D. A. McFarlane, J. Lundberg and H. Neff

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 3: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

Figu

re1

The

site

loca

tion

map

,sho

win

gG

BC

ave

som

e3

kmto

the

wes

toft

hem

ain

focu

sof

both

Rom

anan

d18

th–1

9th

cent

ury

min

ing.

The

area

of‘g

ruff

ygr

ound

’aro

und

the

cave

site

issh

own.

The

area

ofin

tens

ive

min

ing

acti

vity

arou

ndB

lack

moo

rV

alle

y/U

bley

War

ren

that

isen

clos

edin

the

dogl

egge

dre

ctan

gle

show

sde

tail

sof

Rom

anan

d18

th–1

9th

cent

ury

min

ing

rem

nant

s(b

ased

ona

map

from

the

Uni

vers

ity

ofB

rist

olSp

elae

olog

ical

Soci

ety

2012

,whi

chis

repr

oduc

edin

the

Bri

tish

Geo

logi

calS

urve

yw

ebsi

te:

http

://w

ww

.bgs

.ac.

uk/m

endi

ps/i

ndus

tria

l_ar

chae

olog

y/in

darc

h.ht

ml.

The

inse

tm

apsh

ows

the

loca

tion

inSo

uth

Wes

tE

ngla

nd.

A speleothem record of early British and Roman mining 433

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 4: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

would have oxidized to anglesite (PbSO4) or been converted to cerrusite (PbCO3) under theaction of carbon dioxide–rich meteoric water. Both minerals are relatively soluble (0.04 g/l and0.0011 g/l at 20°C, respectively: Weast and Astle 1982) and can readily enter surface drainageand groundwater. Morgan (1900) has estimated that some 10% of the lead placed in the fur-naces was volatized and lost to the atmosphere, which implies the emission of some 10 000 tons(~1 ¥ 107 kg) of lead, much of which was presumably deposited in the immediate vicinity ofthe mines.

The Charterhouse area hosts a number of extensive and well-studied cave systems, generallydeveloped in the lower units of the Black Rock Limestone as it dips to the south at 15°–30°(Waltham et al. 1997). GB Cave consists of 1950 m of passages extending to a depth of 135 m,but is better considered part of a single GB Cave/Charterhouse cave system totalling 6800 m andhaving a vertical range of 228 m (Atkinson 2012). GB Cave has long been renowned for itsinvestiture of speleothems, many of which appear to have low detrital content. Speleothems retainthe trace element signatures of their formative drip-waters (e.g., Goede and Vogel 1991; Fairchildet al. 2001) and have been previously studied in a speleothem from GB Cave (Roberts et al.1999). It is therefore reasonable to presume that GB Cave speleothems, lying only a few tens ofmetres below a landscape heavily contaminated by the lead smelting industry, should retain arecord of that industry in their trace element profiles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The speleothem used in this study was a stalagmite that had been previously collected from‘The Bridge’ of GB Cave, Mendip (51.3027°N; 2.7531°W, 258 m a.s.l.) and sectioned anddated by other studies (Dennis et al. 2001). A subsection of the stalagmite (Fig. 2) was usedin this study. Elemental analyses were performed on a GBC Optimass 8000 time-of-flight massspectrometer linked to a New Wave UP-213 ultraviolet laser ablation system. Data werecollected during ablation of 30 mm spots spaced at 150 mm intervals. Data were calibrated usingstandard glasses SRM-614 and NIST-612, with calcium used as the internal standard. Uranium–thorium dating was done by thermal ionization mass spectrometry (TIMS). Ages were calculatedusing half-lives from Cheng et al. (2000). These very clean samples (as indicated by the high230Th/232Th activity ratios; Table 1) required no correction for detrital contamination.

The age model was constructed using the date of collection (1980) and the six TIMS-datedhorizons (dated in 1997) by fitting a polynomial curve to each of three overlapping sectionsfollowing the curvature of the transect (upper, middle, base). Each dated sample was cut about3 mm thick and parallel with the growth lines. The exponential nature of the decay equationsmeans that the resultant date represents a point slightly to the older side of the mid-point, ~58%of the sample thickness, or in this case ~1.74 mm from the top of the cut piece. The error onthe time scale includes the analytical error of the dates (ranging from 14 to 134 years) and thestratigraphic error (error in cutting and in tracing growth lines from the dated position to thetransect position). The stratigraphic error combined with error in curve fitting was estimated atabout 1 mm. The actual age error represented by this 1 mm varies with growth rate, being greaterfor periods of slower growth.

The 551 points measured along the transect were screened for potential bias caused by:(i) sampling fine detrital particles rather than calcite crystals (all points with >1000 ppm Si wereremoved); and (ii) sampling fluid inclusions rather than crystals (all points with Ca values lowerthan 2.5 standard deviations from the mean were removed). This resulted in the exclusion of24 points (but, in the end, this exclusion made no significant difference to the final graph).

434 D. A. McFarlane, J. Lundberg and H. Neff

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 5: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results from the U–Th dating are shown in Table 1 and the Pb concentration is plottedagainst age in Figure 3 (raw data and five-point running mean). The error on the age scale isshown as a ribbon around the five-point running mean, the width varying over time. The lead

Figure 2 The positions of dates and of the LA–ICP–MS transect. The dates were done as part of a previous study(Dennis et al. 2001), which also consumed the majority of the sample, thereby limiting the material available for thistransect.

Table 1 The results of TIMS U–Th dating: all ratios are activity ratios and errors are 2s

Sample Age U (ppm) 230Th/234U 234U/238U 230Th/232Th 234U/238U initial

GB40 Top 225 1 4 19.8 0.00206 1 0.00003 3.3212 1 0.0092 113 3.323GB40 06 1995 1 8 14.0 0.01814 1 0.00007 3.2974 1 0.0128 2695 3.310GB40 12 2494 1 6 15.2 0.02264 1 0.00005 3.2681 1 0.0053 2187 3.284GB40 18 3125 1 5 12.5 0.02830 1 0.00004 3.2897 1 0.0059 3563 3.310GB40 25 4183 1 15 11.6 0.03774 1 0.00013 3.2427 1 0.0115 2516 3.269GB40 36 5136 1 35 14.6 0.04617 1 0.00030 3.2376 1 0.0075 5357 3.270

A speleothem record of early British and Roman mining 435

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 6: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

Figu

re3

Apl

otof

Pb

(ppm

)ve

rsus

date

s(t

hera

wda

taar

esh

own

byth

efin

edo

tted

line

,an

dth

efiv

e-po

int

runn

ing

mea

nby

the

soli

dli

ne).

The

erro

ron

the

age

scal

eis

repr

esen

ted

byth

eth

ick

pale

ribb

onar

ound

the

five-

poin

tru

nnin

gm

ean,

the

thic

knes

sva

ryin

gov

erti

me,

bein

gle

ast

betw

een

abou

t15

00B

Can

dab

out

AD

300.

TIM

Sda

tes

are

show

nby

the

blac

ksq

uare

s,th

e2s

erro

rbe

ing

smal

ler

than

the

sym

bols

.

436 D. A. McFarlane, J. Lundberg and H. Neff

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 7: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

record is non-random, has a modal value in the 10–20 ppm range and is skewed by severalobvious peaks.

There has been some discussion in the recent literature on trace elements in speleothemsabout the importance of colloidal transportation of some elements (e.g., Fairchild and Baker2012). If this were true of the Pb in the GB sample, then the record might be significantly biasedby hydrological events. Fairchild et al. (2001) and Hartland et al. (2012) suggest that trans-portation by organic colloids should be indicated by covariation of elements that are stronglybound to colloids (such as Pb, Zn, Y, Cu, Ni and Co) in contrast to those not transportedcolloidally, such as Sr and Ba. If colloidal transportation was a significant factor in the elementaldistribution of the GB sample, then we would expect some of these (non-Pb) elements whoserecord is not conflated with mining activity to covary. This is not supported by the data: forexample, R2

Zn:Y = 0.12, R2Zn:Cu = 0.01, R2

Zn:Ni = 0.24, R2Zn:Co = 0.18, R2

Y:Cu = -0.06, R2Y:Ni = 0.09,

R2Cu:Ni = -0.03, R2

Ni:Co = -0.07. Equally, there is no evidence of covariance with the non-colloidally transported elements: for example, R2

Cu:Sr = 0.07, R2Cu:Ba = -0.15, R2

Zn:Ba = -0.02.Further, the absence of correlation of the Pb record with any of the recognized colloidal-transportmarkers (e.g., R2

Pb:Cu = 0.2, R2Pb:Y = 0.06), nor with any other of 54 elements co-analysed (e.g.,

R2Pb:Al = 0.15, R2

Pb:Th = 0.04, R2Pb:Fe = -0.04, R2

Pb:Zn = 0.1), supports our conclusion that colloidaltransportation is unlikely to be a significant factor in the Pb record from GB.

For this study, the spatial scale of sampling is not significantly different from the annual growthrate. Thus the possibility that aliasing may have biased the record must be addressed. If aliasingwere important, then all elements that show a distinct seasonal variation (such as Sr, Cu, Pb, Yand Zn: Borsato et al. 2007) would be magnified/minimized in the same manner and would beexpected to correlate with each other and with Pb. That they do not in our record implies theabsence of aliasing bias.

The galena ore is not very soluble in rainwater (Stanton 1991), so natural leaching fromundisturbed ore-bodies is presumed to be minimal and at a relatively constant rate. We haveused a sample of Last Interglacial (MIS 5e, ~125 ka) flowstone from Lamb Leer (Wells andMendip Museum specimen #6/1989/30), a cave ~6 km east of Charterhouse that lies below alead mining orefield, as a ‘control’ for the pre-anthropogenic lead record. LA–ICP–MS analy-sis of a transect spanning some 5000 years of this sample yielded a mean lead content of8 1 16 ppm (the variation being randomly distributed). Background levels of lead in the GBstalagmite sample are in the range of ~10 ppm, quite comparable with the Lamb Leer ‘control’levels.

Peak events in the GB Pb record reach ~100–120 ppm. The excess lead is potentially fromthree main sources: atmospheric fallout from smelting, groundwater leaching of slags and ore,and disruptions of the soils/sediments by digging. Thus, variations in the stalagmite probablyreflect, in addition to the natural background levels, changes in the relative contributions of thesesources, some more regional and some more local in scale, as well as a short lag time betweenstimulus and response related to mixing of waters in the epikarstic zone (Smart and Friederich1987). The high correlation between the lead and uranium records (R2 for raw data Pb versusU = 0.51, running means Pb versus U = 0.60), which is not seen in the silica (R2: 0.04), alu-minium (R2: 0.11), strontium (R2: 0.20) or barium records (R2: 0.16), is strongly supportive of thehypothesis that we are seeing a record of mining and smelting, rather than climatic events thatmight have changed the leaching and delivery pattern of trace elements into the cave. We firsttested the hypothesis that Pb levels in the speleothem mirror human activity by comparing Pblevels with the known history of mining activity in the region during the Roman and post-Romantimes. Then we looked at the prehistoric record.

A speleothem record of early British and Roman mining 437

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 8: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

Roman era

Roman interest in British metalliferous resources, particularly lead, silver and tin, pre-datedthe invasion of ad 43. Cornish tin had been traded to the Mediterranean powers as early asthe fourth century bc (Welsh 1963), and these resources would have been familiar to JuliusCaesar when he began his British campaigns in 55 bc. Following the successful Claudianinvasion, the Romans established themselves at Charterhouse very quickly. Comments byWhittick (1982) notwithstanding, detailed research has confirmed that Roman production andexport of lead pigs was under way no later than ad 49 (Todd 1996b), just 6 years after theinvasion—indeed, some authors have speculated that control of the Charterhouse mines mayhave been a major motivation and primary target for the invasion (e.g., Dobson 1931; Ellis1992). If this were the case, Roman production probably commenced within a year or two ofthe invasion.

The GB Cave record shows the first, modest, ‘Roman’ peak at c. ad 50–150 (1 ~50 years),which corresponds well with Todd’s (1996b) analysis of recovered lead pigs that are mostfrequent in the latter decades of the first century ad. A lead minimum in the last part of the secondcentury ad suggests that mining on Mendip may have waxed and waned with political stability(Whittick 1982). Thereafter, the lead record begins a steady climb, peaking at c. ad 400. Theend of the Roman era is marked by a precipitous collapse in lead levels to a minimum aroundad 600 correlating with the onset of the invasions of, and possible replacement of, the Britonsin the region by Anglo-Saxons (Stenton 1973, 314–15) and the start of the Dark Ages.

The post-Roman era (AD 400–1900)

The correlation between the speleothem lead record and mining activity continues in the post-Roman period, c. ad 400–1900, for which there is a documented history (Gough 1967). There isa rapid decline in lead content from Roman era levels to background levels in the seventh to ninthcenturies—the ‘Dark Ages’—correlative with no recorded mining activities. A minor but short-lived recovery between the end of the ninth century and the mid-10th century might be correlatedwith the increasing civil stability associated with the beginnings of the proto-English state underKing Egbert (reigned ad 802–39), Alfred the Great (reigned ad 871–99), and the rise ofAthelstan, first king of all England (ad 925–39). The decline in Pb levels to background levelsover the course of the 10th century correlates with increasing Viking invasions (Heritage History2012), culminating in the Norman conquest in ad 1066. Subsequent to this, increasing civilstability and industrial activity in Norman times is mirrored by a steady increase in the spele-othem lead record. The construction of nearby Wells cathedral, begun in ad 1175, and dedicatedin ad 1239, testifies to the general wealth of the Church lands, of which the most important werealmost certainly the Mendip mines (Gough 1967), and also would have created a significant localdemand for lead roofing.

Mining activity generally flourished over the next few centuries, with rises and dips thatcontinue to reflect civil stability. The stable period of the 13th century (a time of populationexpansion and the expansion of the first British universities) is marked by a Pb peak, followedby the 14th century dip during a time of war and plague (the Hundred Years’ War with Franceand the Black Death: Encyclopedia Britannica 2012). The next dip, showing in our record atc. ad 1500, correlates with documentary evidence that the mines were doing poorly in Tudortimes (Gough 1967). The late 16th century peak marks the prosperity of the Elizabethan period,the height of the ‘English Renaissance’ (Hadfield 2001), a time of rapid growth of population

438 D. A. McFarlane, J. Lundberg and H. Neff

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 9: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

and of towns. The subsequent sharp decline in the lead record around ad 1600–1700 broadlycorrelates with the internal conflict that culminated in the English Civil War (ad 1642–9).

The subsequent recovery of the Mendip mining industry in the 18th century, mirrored by theGB record, is well documented (Gough 1967). This was probably driven by new metallurgicaltechnologies (Burt 1991). Recent scholarship (Vergani 1979; Hollister 1985) has shown thatgunpowder was in use in European mines at least as early as 1574. The introduction of gunpow-der to British mining was much later, commonly cited as dating to c.1662 (Barnatt et al. 1997),but which is now recognized to have occurred by 1638 (Earl 1978). It is possible that the GB Cavelead record, which begins a steep increase in the late 17th century, might reflect the reinvigorationof the industry by the introduction of gunpowder into the British mining industry, which wouldhave made deeper excavations into the Charterhouse limestone more economically attractive.

Mendip lead mining saw a rapid decline and had ceased by the middle decades of the 18thcentury (Gough 1967). The final revival of Mendip lead mining, a rather short-lived burst from1858 to 1908, was based on reworking slag, with evidence of much mobilization of sediments andsome extreme pollution (Macklin 1985). These short-term peaks and troughs are masked in thesmoothed GB data, but the raw data signal parallels them, with a steep post-1750 decline, and asteep rise at c.1800 peaking in c.1880. This is followed by a rapid drop at the very top of ourtransect just after ad 1900.

The pre-Roman era

Having shown that the speleothem lead signal faithfully follows the known historical record ofmining activity, we then examined it for the time period with very little documentary evidence.It is generally acknowledged (e.g., Ellis 1992; Todd 1996a,b; Fradley 2009) that mining musthave already have been established in the Mendip area to attract the attention of the Romaninvaders. However, the pre-Roman record is quantitatively and chronologically unknown.

A notable feature of the GB Cave speleothem record is a marked spike in lead levels, peakingat c.1600 bc, corresponding to the latest part of the Early Bronze Age (Pearson 2005). This peakis the second highest in the ~5000 year record, and may well represent the earliest lead miningand smelting in the district. It is of note that the Bronze Age copper mine at Great Orme in Waleshas yielded radiocarbon dates of 1465–1885 cal bc (2s; Lewis 1996), the copper mines atCwmystwyth, Wales, have produced a radiocarbon age of 2000–1900 bc (O’Brien 1996) and thecopper mines at Ross Island, County Kerry, Ireland date from 2400 bc to 2000 bc (O’Brien1996), so there is no question that metallurgical technology was available in the British Islesat that time. The possibility that the earliest mining at Charterhouse was targeted on copper,rather than lead, is contraindicated by the lack of a Cu/Pb correlated signal in the speleothem.Higher-than-background values for Pb in the interval 3000 bc to 2000 bc may reflect earlyBronze Age lead mining, or may result from Bronze Age forest clearance and its associateddisturbance and destruction of soil profiles and probable disturbance of the galena surface lagdeposits (Todd 1996a). Around 1500 bc, lead levels drop precipitously to background levels,where they remain until c.1100 bc, after which they increase to a second major peak around1050 bc—an interval corresponding to the Wilburton Phase when leading of bronzes wascommon (e.g., Rohl and Needham 1998)—before declining to background around 700 bc,perhaps correlating with the transition into the Iron Age. More sporadic activity is indicatedbetween c.600 bc and ad 0. Overall, the record suggests that there were three distinct episodesof pre-Roman mining in the Charterhouse district: (I) c.1800 bc to 1500 bc; (II) c.1100 bc to800 bc; and (III) c.350 bc to ad 0.

A speleothem record of early British and Roman mining 439

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 10: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

A complicating factor is that these peaks correlate with broad-scale changes in climate.Charman et al. (2006) produced a regional composite water table record for northern Britain overthe past 4500 years, arguing, from the correlation with periods of high lake level in mid-Europe(Magny 2004), and the correlation with the records of ice-rafted debris in the North Atlantic(Bond et al. 2001), that major changes in terrestrial water table balance are broadly synchronousthroughout north-west Europe. These climate oscillations affected human activity; for example,the cooler, wetter period around 800–550 bc correlates with a sharp decline and collapse of thebronze industry in Britain (Brown 2008), glacier advance in Europe, abandonment of highlandsettlements and lowering of the tree line (Lamb 1964, 1982). Figure 4 shows the GB speleothemPb record for the period from c.2200 bc to 0 bc (which brackets the three pre-Roman miningepisodes) against these three indices of regional climate change. Notable is the distinct correla-tion of high Pb with reduced ice-rafted debris, a low water table and low lake levels. Weconjecture that mining activity varied as population density responded to changing climaticconditions.

The pre-Roman lead record in the GB Cave speleothem proved to be more complex than wasoriginally anticipated and leads to questions about the relative amplitude of the signal at differenttimes. The evidence found so far points to Roman mining focused on centres such as Charter-house and Ubley Warren, close to the local concentrations of galena (Todd 1996a), but not in theimmediate environs of GB Cave. Thus is it likely that, during the time of Roman mining andsmelting, the lead reached the cave by atmospheric deposition only, and it is likely that this‘Roman’ record is somewhat subdued because the cave was upwind of the smelters at Charter-house. While mining may not have occurred above GB Cave in Roman times, the abundance of‘gruffy ground’ indicates that mining directly above the cave certainly did occur at some time andwas probably not confined to a single era. Local mining obviously contributes a much moreimmediate and substantial Pb load to the speleothem. We conjecture that the pre-Roman peaks are

Figure 4 The Pb record for the period of pre-Roman mining activity (thick line) correlated with regional climaticindicators arranged to show drier, warmer conditions at the top and wetter, colder conditions at the bottom. The recordof ice-rafted debris from the North Atlantic is from Bond et al. (2001) (thin line, with reversed scale), the composite recordof regional water table variations from Charman et al. (2006) (dashed line, with reversed scale), and the periods of highlake level in mid-Europe from Magny (2004) (shaded rectangles).

440 D. A. McFarlane, J. Lundberg and H. Neff

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 11: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

likely to represent such local mining and are thus magnified in importance in the GB recordrelative to more distant activities.

CONCLUSION

The results of this laser ablation ICP–MS transect of a speleothem from GB Cave, close toCharterhouse, Mendip Hills, UK, show Pb variations over the past 5 ka. Roman and post-Romanlead mining activities are well documented for this region. The speleothem record correlates wellwith the known historical record of lead mining in the district, the principal features of whichinclude: the Roman lead mining peak; the Dark Ages cessation; gradual, episodic revival up tothe late 16th century peak; the 17th century collapse and subsequent recovery; and the finalshort-lived burst at the end of the 19th century. This correlation supports the assumption thatthe pre-Roman lead record also derives from local mining. This record is the first example ofquantifying human mining activity through trace element signature of a speleothem. The mostimportant results to emerge from this research are: (i) the correlation of the GB speleothemPb record with known historical mining activity in the area; (ii) the evidence of significantpre-Roman mining activity in the Charterhouse region; and (iii) the dating of this activity to threemain peaks at 1800–1500 bc, 1100–800 bc and 350–0 bc. This record thus provides the first solidevidence of significant pre-Roman mining activity in the Charterhouse region, and the first soliddating of that activity.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks are due to Peter Rowe and Tim Atkinson (University of East Anglia) and Peter Smart(Bristol University) for supplying the sample, which was collected and dated with support fromthe UK Natural Environment Research Council (GR3/3479, GR3/10473). We also thank ChrisHawkes (Wells and Mendip Museum) for access to the Lamb Leer sample.

REFERENCES

Atkinson, A., 2012, The Charterhouse and GB Cave system, University of Bristol Spelaeological Society, Bristol;http://www.ubss.org.uk/resources/surveys/survex/Charterhouse_GB_systemA0.pdf (accessed 6 June 2012).

Barnatt, J., Rieeuwerts, J., and Thomas, G. H., 1997, Early use of gunpowder in the Peak District: Stone Quarry Mine andDutchman Level, Ecton, Derbyshire, Bulletin of the Peak District Mines Historical Society, 13(4), 24–43.

Bond, G., Kromer, B., Beer, J., Muscheler, R., Evans, M. N., Showers, W., Hoffmann, S., Lotti-Bond, R., Hajdas, I., andBonani, G., 2001, Persistent solar influence on North Atlantic climate during the Holocene, Science, 294(5549),2130–6.

Borsato, A., Frisia, S., Fairchild, I. J., Somogyi, A., and Susini, J., 2007, Trace element distribution in annual stalagmitelaminae mapped by micrometer-resolution X-ray fluorescence: implications for incorporation of environmentallysignificant species, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 71, 1494–512.

Bostock, R., and Riley H. T. (trans.), 1855, Book 34, Ch. 49, in Pliny the Elder, The natural history, Henry G. Bohn,London.

Brown, T., 2008, The Bronze Age climate and environment of Britain, The International Journal of Research into theArchaeology of the British and European Bronze Age, 1, 7–22 (The British Museum).

Burt, R., 1991, The international diffusion of technology in the early modern period: the case of the British nonferrousmining industry, The Economic History Review, 44(2), 249–71.

Charman, D. J., Blundell, A., Chiverrell, R. C., Hendon, D., and Langdon, P. G., 2006, Compilation of non-annuallyresolved Holocene proxy climate records: Stacked Holocene peatland palaeo-water table reconstructions fromnorthern Britain, Quaternary Science Reviews, 25, 336–50.

A speleothem record of early British and Roman mining 441

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 12: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

Cheng, H., Edwards, R. L., Hoff, J., Gallup, C. D., Richards, D. A., and Asmerom, Y., 2000, The half-lives ofuranium-234 and thorium-230, Chemical Geology, 169(1–2), 17–33.

Currant, A. P., Jacobi, R. M., and Stringer, C. B., 1989, Excavations at Gough’s Cave, Somerset 1986–7, Antiquity, 63,131–6.

Dennis, P. F., Rowe, P. J., and Atkinson, T. C., 2001, The recovery and isotopic measurement of water from fluidinclusions in speleothems, Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 65(6), 871–84.

Dobson, D. P., 1931, The archaeology of Somerset, Methuen, London.Earl, B., 1978, Cornish explosives, The Trevithick Society, Camborne.Ellis, P., 1992, Mendip Hills: an archaeological survey of the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, English Heritage and

Somerset County Council, Taunton.Encyclopedia Britannica, 2012, http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/615557/United-Kingdom/44804/Social-

economic-and-cultural-change (accessed 1 August 2012).Fairchild, I. J., and Baker, A., 2012, Speleothem science: from process to past environments, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.Fairchild, I. J., Baker, A., Borsato, A., Frisia, S., Hinton, R. W., McDermott, F., and Tooth, A. F., 2001, Annual to

sub-annual resolution of multiple trace-element trends in speleothems, Journal of the Geological Society, London,158, 831–41.

Fradley, M., 2009, The field archaeology of the Romano-British settlement at Charterhouse-on-Mendip, Britannia, 40,99–122.

Goede, A., and Vogel, J. C., 1991, Trace element variations and dating of a Late Pleistocene Tasmanian speleothem,Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 88, 121–31.

Gough, J. W., 1967, The mines of Mendip, David and Charles, Newton Abbott.Green, G. W., 1958, The central Mendip lead–zinc orefield, Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Great Britain, 14,

70–90.Hadfield, A., 2001, The English Renaissance: 1500–1620, Blackwell, Oxford.Hartland, A., Fairchild, I. J., Lead, J. R., Borsato, A., Baker, A., Frisia, S., and Baalousha, Mhd., 2012, From soil to cave:

Transport of trace metals by natural organic matter in karst dripwaters, Chemical Geology, 304, 68–82.Heritage History, 2012, http://www.heritage-history.com/www/heritage.php?Dir=wars&FileName=wars_danebritain.

php (accessed 1 August 2012).Hollister, G. J., 1985, Gunpowder and mining in sixteenth and seventeenth century Europe, History of Technology, 10,

31–66.Jacobi, R. M., 2004, The Late Upper Palaeolithic lithic collection from Gough’s Cave, Cheddar, Somerset and human use

of the cave, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society, 70, 1–92.Jacobi, R., and Higham, T. F. G., 2009, The early Lateglacial re-colonization of Britain: new radiocarbon evidence from

Gough’s Cave, southwest England, Quaternary Science Reviews, 28(19–20), 1895–913.Lamb, H. H., 1964, The English climate, English Universities Press, London.Lamb, H. H., 1982, Climate, history and the modern world, Methuen, London.Levitan, B. M., and Smart, P. L., 1989, Charterhouse Warren Farm Swallet, Mendip, Somerset: radiocarbon dating

evidence, Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society, 18(3), 390–4.Lewis, C. A., 1996, Prehistoric mining at the Great Orme: criteria for the identification of early mining, M.Phil. thesis,

University of Wales, Bangor.Macklin, M. G., 1985, Flood-plain sedimentation in the Upper Axe Valley, Mendip, England, Transactions of the Institute

of British Geographers, New Series, 10(2), 235–44.Magny, M., 2004, Holocene climatic variability as reflected by mid-European lake-level fluctuations, and its probable

impact on prehistoric human settlements, Quaternary International, 113, 65–80.Morgan, T., 1900, Notes on the lead industry of the Mendip Hills, Transactions of the Federated Institution of Mining

Engineers, 10, 478–94.Nriagu, J. O., 1996, A history of global metal pollution, Science, 272, 223–4.O’Brien, W., 1996, Bronze Age copper mining in Britain and Ireland, Shire Publications, Princes Risborough.Pearson, M. P., 2005, Bronze Age Britain, rev. edn, Batsford, London.Roberts, M. S., Smart, P. L., Hawkesworth, C. J., Perkins, W. T., and Pearce, N. J. G., 1999, Trace element variations in

coeval Holocene speleothems from GB Cave, southwest England, The Holocene, 9(6), 707–13.Rohl, B., and Needham, S., 1998, The circulation of metal in the British Bronze Age: the application of lead isotope

analysis, Occasional Paper No. 102, The British Museum, London.Rosman, K. J. R., Chisholm, W., Hong, S., Candelone, J-P., and Boutron, C. F., 1997, Lead from Carthaginian and Roman

Spanish mines isotopically identified in Greenland ice dated from 600 bc to 300 ad, Environmental Science andTechnology, 31, 3413–16.

442 D. A. McFarlane, J. Lundberg and H. Neff

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443

Page 13: A SPELEOTHEM RECORD OF EARLY BRITISH AND ROMAN …

Smart, P. L., and Friederich, H., 1987, Water movement and storage in the unsaturated zone of a maturely karstifiedaquifer, Mendip Hills, England, in Proceedings of the Conference on Environmental Problems in Karst Terrains andTheir Solutions, 59–87, National Water Well Association, Bowling Green, KY.

Stanton, W. E. I., 1985, Mendip lead mining—the Charterhouse orefield, Earth Science Conservation, 22, 42–3.Stanton, W. I., 1991, The habitat and origin of lead ore in Grebe Swallet Mine, Charterhouse-on-Mendip, Somerset,

Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society, 19(1), 43–65.Stenton, F. M., 1973, The Anglo-Saxons, 3rd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Todd, M., 1996a, Ancient mining on Mendip, Somerset: a preliminary report on recent work, Bulletin of the peak District

Mines Historical Society, 13(2), 47–51.Todd, M., 1996b, Pretia victoriae? Roman lead and silver mining on the Mendip Hills, Somerset, England, Münstersche

Beitrage zur antiken Handelsgeschichte, 15, 1–18.Tylecote, R. F., 1964, Roman lead working in Britain, British Journal for the History of Science, 2, 25–43.University of Bristol Spelaeological Society, 2012; http://www.bgs.ac.uk/mendips/industrial_archaeology/indarch.html

(accessed 6 June 2012).Vergani, R., 1979, Gli inizi dell’uso della polvere da spara nell’ attivita mineraria: il caso Veneziano, Studi Veneziani, new

series, III, 979, 97–140.Waltham, A. C., Simms, M. J., Farrant, A. R., and Goldie, H. S., 1997, Karst and caves of Great Britain, Chapman and

Hall, London.Weast, R. C., and Astle, M. J. (eds.), 1982, CRC handbook of chemistry and physics, 63rd edn, CRC Press, Boca Raton,

FL.Welsh, G. P., 1963, Britannia: the Roman conquest and occupation of Britain, Wesleyan University Press, Middletown,

CT.Whittick, G. C., 1982, The earliest Roman lead-mining on Mendip and in North Wales: a reappraisal, Britannia, 13,

113–23.

A speleothem record of early British and Roman mining 443

© 2013 University of Oxford, Archaeometry 56, 3 (2014) 431–443