14
A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg [email protected] Sam Giraud [email protected]

A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg [email protected] Sam Giraud [email protected]

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

A Risky Business

Kiersten [email protected]

Sam Giraud [email protected]

Page 2: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

Background Information• Controversy over the production, trade

and labeling of GMOs has been growing for several decades.

• Gene manipulation is becoming more complex and widespread.

• Increasing global production and trade of GMOs in an already unstable international atmosphere has lead us to ask...

Page 3: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

We think the answer is yes! Stay tuned to find out why...

Page 4: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

The what, how and “uh-oh!” of the situation

• An organism with altered genetic material, often incorporating DNA from a foreign source

• Two types of GMOs▪First generation▪Second generation

Page 5: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

• Reduction in time to produce new crop varieties

• Pest and disease control• Herbicide resistance• Increased vitamin content• Increased production

Page 6: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

• Threats to biodiversity• Release before safety assessment• Increase herbicide use• Allergic reactions • Foreign proteins• International safety threats-

biological warfare• Ethics

Page 7: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

Controversies

• US labeling policy and public opinion not in sync

• Conflicting trade interests and ethical concerns

• Inconsistencies in production and regulation

Page 8: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu
Page 9: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

Conflicting international viewpoints

▪ Food-based heritage

▪ Lower trust in authorities

▪ Disease scares▪ International bio-

safety regulations necessary

▪ Precautionary based policy

▪ Economic growth▪ High confidence in

authorities▪ Food-based

diseases haven’t reached US shores

▪ Favors domestic policy making

▪ Science based policy

Page 10: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

The peak of the conflict

• US, Canada and Argentina sue Europe for moratorium ▪1998-2004▪Not scientifically justified

• World Trade Organization preliminary ruling in favor of US

Page 11: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu
Page 12: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu
Page 13: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

Our ConclusionsDue to...• The lack of standardization,

production and labeling• The recent lawsuit against the

EU

Page 14: A Risky Business Kiersten Isgrigg kisgrigg@umich.edu Sam Giraud samlily@umich.edu

Something to think about…

These factors can teach us a lesson about the importance of

avoiding conflict:

Coming to a consensus about standardized GMO regulation and production will lead to a happier and healthier global community!

keep the views of others in mind