62
A review of atomic-gas Bose- Einstein condensation experiments for Workshop: “Hawking Radiation in condensed-matter systems” Eric Cornell JILA Boulder, Colorado

A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for Workshop: “Hawking Radiation in condensed-matter systems” Eric Cornell JILA Boulder, Colorado. The basic loop . Cooling . Minimum temperature. Stray heating. Confinement . Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Workshop: “Hawking Radiation in condensed-matter systems”

Eric Cornell JILABoulder, Colorado

Page 2: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The basic loop.

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays

Observables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance. Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.

A range of numbers.

Page 3: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The basic loop.(once every minute)

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays

Observables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance. Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.

A range of numbers.

Page 4: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 5: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

2.5 cm

Laser cooling

Page 6: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 7: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 8: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 9: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 10: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 11: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 12: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Basic cooling idea leads to Basic cooling limit.Heating happens.

The basic loop.

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays

Observables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance. Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.

A range of numbers.

Page 13: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

V(x)

x

Self-interacting condensate expands to fill confining potential to height

Page 14: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

V(x)

x

n(x)

Self-interacting condensate expands to fill confining potential to height

Page 15: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

V(x)

x

n(x)

kT

Cloud of thermal excitations made up of atoms on trajectoriesthat go roughly to where the confining potential reaches kT

Page 16: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

V(x)

x

n(x)

When kT < then there are very few thermal excitations extending outside of condensate. Thus evaporation cooling power is small.

kT

Page 17: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

BEC experiments must be completedwithin limited time.

Bang!

Three-body molecular-formation processcauses condensate to decay, and heat!Lifetime longer at lower density, but physics goes more slowly at lower density!

Page 18: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Dominant source of heat:

Bang!

Decay products from three-body recombinationcan collide “as they depart”, leaving behind excess energy in still-trapped atoms.

Page 19: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 20: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Bose-Einstein Condensation in a Dilute Gas: Measurement of Energy and Ground-State Occupation, J. R. Ensher, D. S. Jin, M. R. Matthews, C. E. Wieman, and E. A. Cornell,

Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 4984 (1996)

Page 21: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The basic loop.

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. ArraysObservables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance. Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.

A range of numbers.

Page 22: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

F=2

F=1m=1

m=-1m=0

m=2

m=-2Energy

Typical single-atom energy level diagramin the presence of a magnetic field.Note Zeeman splitting.

Page 23: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

U(B)

B

m=-1

m=0

m=+1

B(x)

x

Page 24: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

U(B)

B

m=-1

m=0

m=+1

B(x)

x

U(x)

x

m=-1

m=0

m=+1

Page 25: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

U(z)

z

m=-1

m=0

m=+1

Why do atomsrest at equilibriumhere?

Gravity (real gravity!) often is important force in experiments

Page 26: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

U(z)

z

m=-1

m=0

m=+1

Why do atomsrest at equilibriumhere?

UB(z)+mgz

z

m=-1

m=0

m=+1

Gravity (real gravity!) often is important force in experiments

Page 27: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Shape of magnetic potential.

U= x2 + y2 + z2 Why?

D

L

R electromagnet coilstypically much larger, farther apart, than size of atomcloud

D, L >> R

so, order x3 terms are small.Magnetic confining potential typically quadratic only,except…

Page 28: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Atom chip substrate

Cross-section of tiny wire patterned on chip

If electromagnets are based on “Atom chip”design, one can have sharper, more structuredmagnetic potentials.

Page 29: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

If electromagnets are based on “Atom chip”design, one can have sharper, more structuredmagnetic potentials.But there is a way to escape entirelyfrom the boring rules of magnetostatics….

Page 30: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Laser beam

laser

Laser too red+atom diffracts light+light provides conservative,attractive potential

Laser too blue+atom diffracts light+light provides conservative,repulsive potential

Laser quasi-resonant+atom absorbs light+light can providedissipative (heating,cooling) forces

Interaction oflight and atoms.

Page 31: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

One pair of beams: standing wave in intensity

Can provide tight confinement in 1-D with almostfree motion in 2-d. (pancakes)

This is a one-D array of quasi-2d condensates

Page 32: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Two pairs of beams:

Can provide tight confinement in 2-D, almost-free motion in 1-d (tubes)

Can have a two-D array of quasi-1d condensates

Page 33: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Why K-T on a lattice?

1.Ease of quantitative comparison.2. Makes it easier to get a quasi-2d system3.This is the Frontier in Lattices Session!!! (come on!)Our aspect ratio, (2.8:1), is modest, but...addition of 2-d lattice makes phase fluctuations much “cheaper” in 2 of 3 dimensions.

z, the “thin dimension”

x, y, the two “large dimemsions”.

Page 34: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Three pairs of beams:

Can provide tight confinement in 3-D, (dots)

Can have a three-D array of quasi-0d condensates

Page 35: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Single laser beam brought to a focus.

Rayleighrange

Can provide a single potential (not an array of potentials)with extreme, quasi-1D aspect ratio.

Additional, weaker beams can change free-particle dispersion relation.

Page 36: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The basic loop.

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays

Observables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance. Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.

A range of numbers.

Page 37: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Observables: It’s all about images.Temperature, pressure, viscosity,all these quantities are inferred from images of the atomic density.

Page 38: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Near-resonant imaging:absorption. signal-noisetypically good, but sampleis destroyed.

Off-resonant imaging:index of refraction mapping. Signal-noise typically less good, but (mostly) nondestructive..

Page 39: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Watching a shock coming into existence110 ms

Page 40: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 41: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

using a bigger beam

Page 42: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for
Page 43: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Absorption imaging: one usuallyinterprets images as of a continuousdensity distribution, but density distribution actually os made up discrete quanta of mass known, (in my subdiscipline of physics) as“atoms”.. Hard to see an individual atom,but can see effects of the discrete nature.

Absorption depth observed in a given box of area A is OD= (N0 +/- N0

1/2) /A

The N01/2 term is the”atom

shot noise”. and it can dominatetechnical noise in the image.

Page 44: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Absorption depth observed in a given box of area A is OD= (N0 +/- N0

1/2) /AThe N0

1/2 term is the”atomshot noise”. and it can dominatetechnical noise in the image.

Atom shot noise will likely be an important backgroundeffect which can obscure Hawking radiation unlessexperiment is designed well.

Page 45: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Atom shot noise limited imaging

Data from lab of Debbie Jin.

Page 46: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

N.B: imaging atoms with light is not the only way to detect them:

I think we will hear from Chris Westbrook about detecting individual metastable atoms.

Page 47: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The basic loop.

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays

Observables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance. Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.

A range of numbers.

Page 48: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

QM: Particle described by Schrödinger equation

rErVm2 extern

2

BEC: many weakly interacting particles Gross-Pitaevskii equation

rrrm

a4V

m22

2

extern

2

Why are BECs so interesting?

The condensate isself-interacting (usually self-repulsive)

Page 49: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

BEC: many weakly interacting particles Gross-Pitaevskii equation

t

rirr

m

aV

m extern

222 4

2

Can be solved in various approximations.

The Thomas-Fermi approximation:ignore KE term, look for stationary states

Page 50: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

BEC: many weakly interacting particles Gross-Pitaevskii equation

t

rirr

m

aV

m extern

222 4

2

Can be solved in various approximations.

The Thomas-Fermi approximation:ignore KE term, look for stationary states

externVrm

a 2

24

Page 51: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The Thomas-Fermi approximation:ignore KE term, look for stationary states

externVrm

a 2

24

V(x)

x

n(x)

Self-interacting condensate expands to fill confining potential to height

Page 52: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

BEC: many weakly interacting particles Gross-Pitaevskii equation

t

rirr

m

aV

m extern

222 4

2

Can be solved in various approximations.

Ignore external potential, look for plane-waveexcitations

Page 53: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

BEC: many weakly interacting particles Gross-Pitaevskii equation

t

rirr

m

aV

m extern

222 4

2

Can be solved in various approximations.

Ignore external potential, look for plane-waveexcitations

Page 54: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Data from Nir Davidson

c = (/m)1/2

= (hbar2/m)1/2

speed of sound:

Healing length:

Chemical potential:

= 4 hbar2 a n /m

Page 55: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

n(x)

(x)

Long wavelengthexcitations(k << 1/)

relatively little density fluctuation,large phase fluctuation(which we can’t directly image).

Page 56: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

n(x)

(x) But, if we turn offinteractions suddenly ( goes to zero), and wait a little bit:

Page 57: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

n(x)

(x)

n(x)

(x)

m goes to zero, gets largenow (k > 1/)

the same excitation nowevolves much larger densityfluctuations.

But, if we turn offinteractions suddenly ( goes to zero), and wait a little bit:

Can you DO that?

Page 58: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The basic loop.

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays

Observables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance.

Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.

A range of numbers.

Page 59: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Magnetic-field Feshbach resonance

molecules

→ ←

attractive

repulsive

B>

free atoms

Page 60: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

Single laser beam brought to a focus.

Suddenly turn off laser beam….

Data example from e.g. Ertmer.

Page 61: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The basic loop.

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays

Observables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance. Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.(a serious problem)

A range of numbers.

Page 62: A review of atomic-gas Bose-Einstein condensation experiments for

The basic loop.

Cooling. Minimum temperature. Stray heating.

Confinement. Magnetic. Optical. Reduced dimensions. Arrays

Observables. Images. Shot noise. Atom counting.

Interactions. The G-P equation. Speed of sound.

Time-varying interactions. feshbach resonance. Reduced dimensions.

Thermal fluctuations.

A range of numbers.(coming later)