29
December 5, 2007 A relation between compatibility and hysteresis and its role in the search for new smart materials Richard James Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics University of Minnesota [email protected] Joint work with S. Müller, J. Zhang Thanks: John Ball, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Chunhwa Chu, Jun Cui, Chris Palmstrom, Eckhard Quandt, Karin Rabe, Tom Shield, Ichiro Takeuchi, Manfred Wuttig

A relation between compatibility and ... - dept.aem.umn.edu

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Microsoft PowerPoint - SC_tour_Caltech_07.pptDecember 5, 2007
A relation between compatibility and hysteresis and its role in the search for new smart materials
Richard James Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics
University of Minnesota [email protected]
Joint work with S. Müller, J. Zhang Thanks: John Ball, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Chunhwa Chu, Jun Cui, Chris Palmstrom,
Eckhard Quandt, Karin Rabe, Tom Shield, Ichiro Takeuchi, Manfred Wuttig
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
A biaxial tension experiment
A hysteresis loop C. Chu
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Main ideas in science on hysteresis in structural phase transformations
Pinning of interfaces by defects System gets stuck in an energy
well on its potential energy landscape
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Free energy and energy wells
Cu69 Al27.5 Ni3.5
minimizers...
1
2 1
Transformation strain matrix
10 µm
twinned
The mechanism of transformation: the passage of an austenite/martensite interface
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Step 1. The bands on the left
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Step 2. A minimizing sequence
min
There are two volume fractions of the twins.
From analysis of this sequence (= the crystallographic theory of martensite), , given the twin system:
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Hypothesis
Hysteresis in martensitic materials is associated with metastability. Transformation is delayed because the additional bulk and interfacial energy that must be present, merely because of co-existence of the two phases, has to be overcome by a further lowering of the well of the stable phase.
Experimental test of this idea: tune the composition of the material to make
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Tuning composition to make
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Au at. %
H ys
te re
si s(
o C )
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
NiTiPt NiTiAu
Jerry Zhang
Data on one graph. Hysteresis = As + Af – Ms – Mf
Jerry Zhang
Hysteresis vs. Jerry Zhang
Triangles: combinatorial synthesis data of Cui, Chu, Famodu, Furuya, Hattrick- Simpers, James, Ludwig, Theinhaus, Wuttig, Zhang, Takeuchi
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Suggestion: nucleation Zhang, Müller, rdj
Possible picture of the “critical nucleus” in austenite
Possible picture of the “critical nucleus” in martensite
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Exploratory calculations Zhang, Müller, rdj
I A B
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Minimize energy
energy
Introduce the criterion
is a given constant. It depends on the material and “defect structure”. Solve for the width of the hysteresis H = 2(θ – θc):
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
?
Magnetoelectric materials
Systematic search in the former Soviet Union in the 1950s: replace the cation of ferroelectric perovskites by magnetic cations (Smolensky, Agranovskaya, Isupov, 1959)
Ni3B7O13I the “Rochelle Salt of magnetoelectrics” Recent: BiMnO3, YMnO3, TbMnO3 BiFeO3 BiMnO3, TbMnO3,
BiFeO3-SmFeO3, BiScO3,BiFeO3, La0.5Ca0.5MnO3, LuFe2O4, La0.25Nd0.25Ca0.5MnO3. Low Curie temperatures, weak ferromagnetism (or antiferromagnetic) or weak ferroelectricity.
Nice survey: N. Hill, “Density functional studies of multiferroic magnetoelectrics”, 2001
Physics of BiMnO3, YMnO3 understood pretty well (Hill and Rabe, Phys. Rev. B59 (1999), 8759-8769
Density Functional Theory for magnetoelectrics
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Simplified explanation
However, empty d-bands is what typically promotes ferroelectric distortion in perovskites. Hybridization between metal cation(d) and O(2p)
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Remarks
Hill (2001): “Therefore, we should in fact never expect the co-existence of ferroelectricity and ferromagnetism.” Hill and Rabe: BiMnO3, YMnO3 accidents of “directional d0-ness”
It is well-known in both ferromagnetism and ferroelectricity that magnetic and electric properties are extremely sensitive to the lattice parameters.
Exchange energy is extremely sensitive to lattice distances (Mn in Ni2MnGa, N2 in rare earth magnets)
R. E. Cohen (2001): “Properties of ferroelectrics are extremely sensitive to volume (pressure), which can cause problems since small errors in volume…can result in large errors in computed ferroelectric properties.”
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Example of this sensitivity: ferromagnetic shape memory materials: Ni2MnGa
austenite martensite
Example, continued, Ni2MnGa magnetization curves
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
M (
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
M (
12000
Proposed approach: seek a reversible first order phase transformation between, e.g., ferroelectric and ferromagnetic phases
Rarity predicted by DFT circumvented The volume fraction of ferroelectric vs.
ferromagnetic phases could be changed
E&M property
Lattice parameter
High -- low solubility for H2 High band gap -- low band gap semiconductor Conductor -- insulator (electrical or thermal) Opaque -- transparent (at various wavelengths) High -- low index of refraction (…also nonlinear optical properties) Luminescent -- nonluminescent Ferroelectric/magnetic – nonferroelectric/magnetic
Other lattice parameter sensitive pairs of properties
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
A way to search for interesting new “smart materials”
Achieve “unlikely properties” by using a martensitic phase transformation and the lattice parameter sensitivity of many electromagnetic properties
Achieve reversibility by tuning lattice parameters to make the phases compatible
December 5, 2007 SC tour - Caltech
Other “accidental relations” among lattice parameters
Theorem. Suppose in addition to , we have, for a “twin system” a,n
Then, there are infinitely many austenite/martensite interfaces, with any volume fraction between 0 and 1.
“cofactor conditions”
Pictures corresponding to
The end