Upload
hoangtram
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
February 2011
S P O T L I G H T
Þ
Þ
Issuance of guidelines for introduction of futures and options contracts on foreign stock indices
Modification in reporting formats of FIIs’ offshore derivatives instruments (ODIs) which include participatory notes (PNs)
ÞÞ
Repo rate increased from 6.25% to 6.50% w.e.f. Jan 25, 2011 Reverse Repo rate increased from 5.25% to 5.50% w.e.f. Jan 25, 2011
Initiated by RBI
A R T I C L E
ÞB M & FBOVESPA launches the Corporate Governance Trade Index (IGCT)
The current global financial crisis has shown that the developments in the financial sector have a significant bearing on
the real sector. The article has traced the development of the Indian securities market during the period 1990 – 2008, as
is evident from the flow of funds accounts. Despite the short term oscillations, the finance ratio, the financial
interrelations ratio, the new issue ratio and the intermediation ratio have been on an upward trajectory over the
medium term and the long term. The lessons from the current crisis and the trend displayed by the financial
development ratios point the need for carrying forward the comprehensive reforms in the economy, covering both the
real and the financial sectors.
I N T E R N A T I O N A L N E W S
State of the Indian Securities Market: Evidence from the Flow of Funds Accounts of the Indian Economy - by Venkateswaran R.
SEBI proposes to restrict outsourcing by intermediaries
SEBI released a discussion paper on outsourcing of activities related to the intermediation services on Jan 19, 2011. The
paper proposes certain principles for outsourcing and indicates activities currently being outsourced by the
intermediaries along with the suggested list of activities which should not be outsourced by them.
ÞÞ
Change in auction timing of capital market segment and revision of activity schedule for auction sessionChange in auction timing of SLB scheme
N S E N E W S
An Investment called India
R E G U L A T O R Y C H A N G E S
Initiated by SEBI
M A R K E T R E V I E W
Prepared by SBU-EDUCATIONNational Stock Exchange of India Ltd.Exchange Plaza, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (E) Mumbai - 400051. Tel No: 022-26598163For detailed NSE Newsletter or for e-subscription, log on to www.nseindia.com>Press Room>NSE Newsletter.
Disclaimer- The views expressed in the published articles are those of respective authors and do not necessarily reflect views of NSE. NSE does not guarantee accuracy of data used in Newsletter and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consumption of their use.
Parameters Rank
Single Stock Futures 2
Stock Index Options rd
Stock Index Futures 3th
Market Capitalisation 9
rd
nd2
NSE's GLOBAL RANKINGS
February 2011
CNX IT CNX FMCG INDEX S&P CNX Finance
S&P CNX Petrohemicals S&P CNX Pharmaceuticals CNX Bank Nifty
CNX Infrastructure S&P CNX Nifty
Nifty Dow Jones NIKKIE Hang seng Nasdaq
Nifty Movements vis-a-vis other International Indices(Rebased to 100 for March 31, 2010)
Performance of select sectors vis-a-vis Nifty (Rebased to 100 for March 31, 2010)
Trading Value ( ` ‘00 cr) Avg. Daily Trading Value ( ` '00 cr)
NSE MARKET STATISTICS
Segments Turnover ( ` crore) change over turnover Capitalisation Dec 2010 Jan 2011 Dec 2010 ( crore) ( crore)
CM WDM F&O CDS(Currency F&O)
TOTAL
Percentage Average daily Market
` `
295,685 267,332 (9.59) 13,367 6,441,49133,962 45,220 33.15 2,261 3,543,592
2,357,109 2,841,834 20.56 142,092237,564 274,833 15.69 13,742
2,924,321 3,429,218 17.27 9,985,083
Source: WFE (Rankings done for the period Jan-Dec 2010). Rankings for single stock futures, stock index options and stock index futures is based on number of contracts traded.
Currency F&O
Avg
. D
aily
Tradin
g V
alu
e
Tradin
g V
alu
e
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
0
30
60
90
120
150
180
210
Sep-1
0
Oct
-10
Nov-
10
Dec-
10
Feb-1
0
Mar-
10
Apr-
10
May-
10
Jun-1
0
Jul-
10
Aug-1
0
Jan-1
1
WDM Segment
Tradin
g V
alu
e
Avg
. D
aily
Tradin
g V
alu
e
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Sep-1
0
Oct
-10
Nov-
10
Dec-
10
Jan-1
1
Feb-1
0
Mar-
10
Apr-
10
May-
10
Jun-1
0
Jul-
10
Aug-1
0
Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-1175
100
125 150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80Mar-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11
Capital Market Segment
1000
2000
3000
4000
Feb-1
0
Mar-
10
Apr-
10
May-
10
Jun-1
0
Jul-
10
Aug-1
0
Sep-1
0
Oct
-10
Nov-
10
Dec-
10
Jan-1
1
Tradin
g V
alu
e
50
100
150
200Avg
. D
aily
Tradin
g V
alu
e
F&O Segment
0
6000
12000
18000
24000
30000
Feb-1
0
Mar-
10
Apr-
10
May-1
0
Jun-1
0
Jul-
10
Aug-1
0
Sep-1
0
Oct-
10
Nov-
10
Dec-1
0
Jan-1
1
Tradin
g V
alu
e
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Avg
. D
aily T
radin
g V
alu
e
NSE Certified Capital Market Professional
(NCCMP)
Program Highlights
• A NSE program hosted by colleges / institutes interested in promoting vocational
education in capital markets.
• 100 hours program, spanning over 3-4 months, covering 80 hours of theoretical and 20
hours of practical training on market operations.
• Aim is to develop and upgrade the skill sets and proficiency in matters related to
securities markets.
• Successful candidates would be awarded a joint certificate by NSE and the respective
college / institute.
• Reputed colleges / institute offering the course in India.
Contact :
• Candidates interested to undergo NCCMP course may find the list of colleges offering
the course at www.nseindia.com > NCFM > NCCMP Course
• Colleges / institutes willing to offer NCCMP in collaboration with NSE may contact :
Ms. Namitha Bannanje at 022-26598252 or send a mail to [email protected]
www.nseindia.com
1
1
State of the Indian Securities Market: Evidence from the Flow of Funds Accounts of the Indian
Economy — Venkateswaran R.*
I. Introduction
India’s financial markets have evolved and undergone structural change during the course of the eco-
nomic reforms. The Indian economy shifted to higher growth trajectories during the same period. The Indian se-
curities market proved the harbinger of the modern Indian financial markets. The rapid strides made (of course,
some dictated by time and circumstances) have helped the Indian securities market emerge as a benchmark for
the rest of the world.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) was initially constituted as a non-statutory body on
April 12, 1988 through an Extraordinary Notification of the Government of India for dealing with all matters re-
lating to development and regulation of securities market and investor protection and to advise the Govern-
ment on all these matters. An Ordinance promulgated by His Excellency the President of India on January 30,
1992 conferred statutory status and powers on SEBI. SEBI was set up as a statutory body on February 21, 1992.
The Ordinance was replaced by an Act of the Parliament on April 04, 1992. The preamble to the SEBI Act, 1992
(Act No. 15 of 1992) states that SEBI has been established to protect the interests of investors in securities and
to promote the development of, and to regulate, the securities market and for matters connected therewith or
incidental thereto.
This Article seeks to trace the development of the Indian securities market during the period 1990 –
2008, as is evident from the flow of funds accounts. It is organized as follows. Section II traces the theoretical
foundation of the flow of funds accounts, while the various financial development ratios have been defined in
Section III. Section IV introduces the flow of funds accounts of the Indian economy. The trends in India’s financial
development ratios are presented in Section V. Section VI concludes.
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
A R T I C L E
F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
“As for securities and the stock market, are they finally good or bad? Are they dangerous? Are they
things that only capitalism has or can socialism also make use of them? To decide whether they can be used, we
must experiment first. If we think they work, if after a year or two we think they are good, then we can expand
them. If problems arise, we can close them down, immediately and completely. And even if we close them
down, we can do so quickly or slowly, or we could even leave a little tail.”
-- Deng Xiaoping (1992)
*Shri Venkateswaran R. is Assistant Director, Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The views expressed are strictly personal and do not necessarily reflect those of the employer. Comments, if any, may be mailed to [email protected]
2
2
II. Literature Review
The extant literature describes the modern flow of funds accounts as representing a systematic record of net
transactions involving financial instruments during a given period of time. The flow of funds accounts are a branch of
social accounting of a country. J.R. Hicks had pointed out the inadequacy of national income and expenditure ac-
counts to judge the performance of an economy and introduced the concept of national balance sheets. The modern
flow of funds accounts are based on M A Copeland’s pioneering work titled “A Study of Moneyflows in the United
States” (1952). A well established statistical framework for presenting the flow of funds accounts is provided by the
United Nations System of National Accounts.
III. An Introduction to the Flow of Funds Accounts
All the economic transactions in a monetized economy involve the exchange of financial claims among the
participants. The flow of funds accounts serve as a useful analytical tool in many respects: identification of individual
sectors having financial surpluses or deficits, determination of the causes of these surpluses/deficits, the financing of
the deficits and, thereby, the inter-sectoral linkages, tracing the growth of important economic institutions, such as
the mutual funds, identification of the pattern of financing of the capital stocks, assessment of the impact of mone-
tary policy actions, to name a few. In this Article, we restrict ourselves to profiling the Indian securities market, as
seen through the financial development ratios derived from the flow of funds accounts of the Indian economy.
Financial claims issued by the economic agents are classified as primary issues and secondary issues. Primary
issues are the claims issued by non-financial sector or the ultimate borrowers. Claims issued by the financial interme-
diaries, on the other hand, are called secondary issues. The flow of funds accounts provide data on financial claims
which can be further analysed to assess the depth and maturity of the financial markets.
The finance ratio is the ratio of total financial claims (or total financial issues) to national income. This is an
indicator of the rate of financial development in relation to economic growth. The financial interrelations ratio is the
ratio of total financial issues to net domestic capital formation. This measure reflects the relation between financial
development and the growth of physical investment.
The new issue ratio is the ratio of primary issues to net domestic capital formation. This ratio is indicative of
the extent of dependence of the non-financial sector on its own funds in financing the capital formation. The inter-
mediation ratio is the ratio between the financial instruments issued by the financial institutions (i.e., secondary is-
sues) and the financial instruments issued by the non-financial sector (i.e., primary issues). This ratio reflects the im-
portance of intermediation by banks and other financial institutions in financing real activities.
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
A R T I C L E ( c o n t d . . )
F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
3
3
IV. Flow of Funds Accounts of the Indian Economy
According to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), flow of funds accounts is a set of accounts which depicts
the inter-sectoral flow of funds among major sectors of the economy ‘from whom to whom’ basis. The RBI has
been publishing the flow of funds accounts of the country since December 1964. The data for India, at present,
pertain to one year, the financial year. The published accounts pertaining to the period 1951–52 to 2007–08 are
available in the several issues of the RBI’s monthly Bulletin.
In the Indian economy, the institutional units, i.e., the economic entities capable of engaging in transac-
tions with other units, are grouped into six categories, viz., (i) banking sector; (ii) other financial institutions;
(iii) private corporate business; (iv) government sector; (v) rest of the world; and (vi) household sector. Financial
assets and liabilities are classified under ten major categories of financial instruments, viz., (i) currency; (ii) de-
posits; (iii) investments; (iv) loans and advances; (v) small savings; (vi) life funds; (vii) provident funds; (viii)
trade debts; (ix) foreign claims not elsewhere classified; and (x) other claims not elsewhere classified.
This Article seeks to trace the development of the Indian securities market during the 1990 – 2008, as is
evident from the flow of funds accounts. Wherever the reporting period has overlapped, we have taken into ac-
count the latest data. The data on the indicators of India’s financial development have been presented in Table I
and Chart I.
V. India’s Financial Development Ratios: 1990 – 91 to 2007 – 08
Over the period, in consonance with the development of the financial markets, total financial issues rose
phenomenally. While the total financial issues were only Rs. 1,67,524 crore in 1990 – 91 and Rs. 7,79,226 crore in
2000 – 01, the total financial issues amounted to Rs. 29,17,987 crore in 2007 – 08. During the decade 1997 – 98 to
2007 – 08, the total financial issues registered a CAGR of 17.08%. The secondary issues and primary issues regis-
tered comparable CAGRs of 18.24% and 16.25% respectively during the same period. Similarly, during the five
years between 2002 – 03 and 2007 – 08, total financial issues registered a CAGR of 23.61%. The secondary issues
and primary issues registered CAGRs of 25.55% and 22.20% respectively during the same period.
The finance ratio exhibited an increasing trend during this period and stood at 0.77 during 2007 - 08. This
once again reaffirms the fact that the growth in the total financial issues have at least kept pace with the eco-
nomic growth during the period.
The financial interrelations ratio exhibited year-to-year fluctuations during the period. The emergence
of kinks in the financial interrelations ratio is attributed to the acceleration/deceleration in the investment ac-
tivity or the net domestic capital formation. The financial interrelations ratio rose from 1.72 during 2004 – 05 to
2.18 during 2007 – 08. It may be inferred that there is a higher level of participation of the financial system in
the domestic capital formation process.
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
A R T I C L E ( c o n t d . . )
F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
4
4
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
The new issue ratio ranged from 1.01 to 2.23 during the period. The sharp fluctuations in the new issue ratio
are also attributed to the acceleration/deceleration in the investment activity or the net domestic capital formation.
During 2006 – 07 and 2007 – 08, the new issue ratio displayed an increasing trend. If this trend is sustained in the sub-
sequent years, we may infer a greater role of financial disintermediation in the domestic capital formation process.
The intermediation ratio remained between 0.46 and 0.90 during the period. The intermediation ratio remain-
ing below 1.00 points to the lower involvement of the financial sector in the secondary issues as compared to the pri-
mary issues.
The trends in all the financial development ratios, thus, reflect the gradualist approach in the economic re-
forms that India embraced. Looking at from the securities market angle, the growth in the volume of financial issues
would have definitely contributed to growth in market capitalization, growth in investor population, development of
financial institutions and market participants, lower weighted average cost of capital for the India Inc., more business
and increased revenues and profits for the market intermediaries, product innovation, greater stock market liquidity
and lower market impact costs.
Conclusions
It is evident that despite the short term oscillations, various financial development ratios have been on an
upward trajectory over the medium term and the long term. The developments in the financial sector have a signifi-
cant bearing on the real sector. The experience during the current global financial crisis has underscored the same.
The financial development indicators have, thus, emphasized the need for carrying forward the comprehensive re-
forms in the economy, covering both the real and the financial sectors.
It is widely recognized that the development of the securities market brings in a host of benefits, including
the creation of more complete financial markets, facilitating financial disintermediation and risk diversification, fi-
nancing of the government deficit, smooth conduct of the monetary policy, sterilization of capital inflows and prod-
uct innovation. Further reforming the securities market in India will, thus, usher in greater benefits.
The High Level Committee on Savings and Investment (2009) (HLC) has identified the new challenges in com-
piling the flow of funds accounts in the context of the widening and deepening of the Indian financial system during
the last two decades. The recommendations of the HLC, once implemented, will remove the data gaps and broaden
the coverage of the flow of funds accounts. SEBI, among other institutions, has also been assigned a role to gather the
relevant information from the regulated entities for incorporation in the flow of funds accounts.
A R T I C L E ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
5
5
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
A R T I C L E ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
Table I: Indicators of India's Financial Development
(Rs. crore)
1990-91 1991-92 1992-93 1993-94 1994-95 1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
I.
Seco
ndar
y Issu
es
71,0
16
106,
386
95,7
90
142,
897
186,
675
140,
337
185,
638
240,
884
277,
498
II.
Prim
ary
Issu
es
96,5
08
131,
918
113,
990
159,
200
223,
512
246,
614
222,
351
362,
009
367,
061
II.1
D
omes
tic
Sect
ors
103,
558
124,
666
117,
511
140,
079
208,
448
239,
849
193,
502
342,
359
350,
075
II.2
R
est of
the
Wor
ld
-7,0
50
7,25
2 -3
,521
19
,121
15
,064
6,
765
28,8
49
19,6
50
16,9
86
III.
Tot
al Is
sues
(I +
II)
167,
524
238,
304
209,
780
302,
097
410,
187
386,
951
407,
989
602,
893
644,
559
IV.
Net
Dom
estic
Cap
ital
For
mat
ion
96,0
00
81,0
34
96,6
03
109,
946
162,
341
197,
127
198,
627
238,
099
241,
820
V.
Nat
iona
l In
com
e 41
8,07
4 47
9,61
2 54
6,02
3 63
7,99
6 81
5,14
2 95
5,15
0 1,
115,
449
1,24
1,01
9 1,
434,
826
VI.
Fina
nce
Rat
io
0.40
0.
50
0.38
0.
47
0.51
0.
41
0.37
0.
49
0.46
VII.
Fi
nanc
ial In
ter-
rela
tion
s Rat
io
1.75
2.
94
2.17
2.
75
2.48
1.
92
2.06
2.
71
2.87
VIII
. New
Issu
e Rat
io
1.01
1.
63
1.18
1.
45
1.35
1.
22
1.12
1.
63
1.63
IX.
Inte
rmed
iation
Rat
io
0.74
0.
81
0.84
0.
90
0.84
0.
57
0.83
0.
67
0.76
Source: Reserve Bank of India
6
6
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
A R T I C L E ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
Table I: Indicators of India's Financial Development (Concluded)
(Rs. crore)
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
I.
Seco
ndar
y Issu
es
273,
759
294,
765
302,
636
412,
295
441,
713
495,
885
678,
092
812,
299
1,28
6,08
2
II.
Prim
ary
Issu
es
307,
956
484,
461
652,
984
598,
771
665,
771
677,
199
862,
361
1,28
6,47
6 1,
631,
905
II.1
Dom
estic
Sect
ors
293,
354
434,
573
590,
853
535,
123
524,
011
552,
807
760,
250
1,05
6,71
5 1,
252,
510
II.2
Res
t of
the
Wor
ld
14,6
02
49,8
88
62,1
31
63,6
48
141,
760
124,
392
102,
111
229,
761
379,
395
III.
Tot
al Iss
ues (I +
II)
581,
715
779,
226
955,
620
1,01
1,06
7 1,
107,
484
1,17
3,08
4 1,
540,
452
2,09
8,77
6 2,
917,
987
IV.
Net
Dom
estic
Cap
ital
For
mat
ion
320,
651
303,
677
292,
359
367,
528
479,
277
682,
171
892,
318
1,08
4,76
8 1,
336,
064
V.
Nat
iona
l In
com
e 1,
585,
502
1,69
6,38
7 1,
849,
361
1,99
4,21
7 2,
237,
414
2,52
6,28
5 2,
875,
958
3,31
2,56
9 3,
787,
596
VI.
Fina
nce
Rat
io
0.34
0.
42
0.52
0.
51
0.49
0.
46
0.54
0.
63
0.77
VII.
Fi
nanc
ial In
ter-
rela
tion
s Rat
io
1.90
2.
58
3.27
2.
75
2.31
1.
72
1.73
1.
93
2.18
VIII
. New
Iss
ue R
atio
1.
01
1.60
2.
23
1.63
1.
39
0.99
0.
97
1.19
1.
22
IX.
Inte
rmed
iation
Rat
io
0.89
0.
61
0.46
0.
69
0.66
0.
73
0.79
0.
63
0.79
Source: Reserve Bank of India
7
7
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
A R T I C L E ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
1990-91
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
1995-96
1996-97
1997-98
1998-99
1999-2000
2000-01
2001-02
2002-03
2003-04
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
Ratios
Yea
r
Ch
art I
: Fin
anci
al D
evel
op
men
t Rat
ios:
199
0 -91
to 2
007
-08
Fin
ance
Rat
ioF
inan
cial
In
terr
elat
ions
Rat
ioN
ew I
ssu
e R
atio
Inte
rmed
iati
on
Rat
io
8
8
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
References
Jadhav, Narendra: Development of Securities Market – The Indian Experience
Levine, Ross (1997): Stock Markets, Economic Development and Capital Control Liberalisation (Investment Company
Institute Perspective)
Reserve Bank of India (1998): Flow of Funds Accounts of the Indian Economy: 1990 – 91 to 1993 – 94
--- (2000): Flow of Funds Accounts of the Indian Economy: 1951 – 52 to 1995 – 96
--- (2007): Flow of Funds Accounts of the Indian Economy: 1994 – 95 to 2000 – 01
--- (2009): Flow of Funds Accounts of the Indian Economy: 2001 – 02 to 2007 – 08
*********
A R T I C L E ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
9
9
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
SEBI proposes to restrict outsourcing by intermediaries
The capital market regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) on January 19, 2011 released a discussion paper proposing to impose restrictions on outsourcing activities conducted by various market intermediaries. The in-termediaries include mutual funds, portfolio managers, depository participants, bankers to an issue, merchant bank-ers, registrar and share transfer agents, and stock brokers.
Outsourcing refers to use of a third party – either within or outside the group - by a registered intermediary to per-form the activities associated with intermediation services. A third party may be used to perform one or more activi-ties or one or more third parties may be used to perform different activities associated with the intermediation ser-vice. Such use may be for a specified period or on a continuing basis. In an extreme form, the third parties may be used to perform all the activities associated with the intermediation service, including legal and regulatory compli-ances and risk management. This includes use of successive third parties, where the first third party may use the sec-ond third party to perform the activities and so on. Over time, the outsourcing arrangements are becoming increas-ingly complex.
Securities market intermediaries in many jurisdictions are increasingly resorting to outsourcing with a view to reduce costs, and at times, for strategic reasons. This benefits market in terms of better access and better expertise. How-ever, since the third parties may not be subject to the regulatory discipline and the activities and, not the account-ability, can be outsourced, outsourcing raises a variety of concerns both for the regulator and the outsourcing inter-mediary. While it is not desirable to ban outsourcing completely for obvious reasons, the concerns need to be ad-dressed and the outsourcing needs to be organized in an orderly manner. This paper is an attempt to develop guide-lines for outsourcing by an intermediary, and not by markets.
Outsourcing raises a variety of concerns both for the regulator and the outsourcing intermediary . There are several risks associated with outsourcing such as operational, reputational and legal risks. There is also concentration and systemic risk, if a large number of market intermediaries rely upon one, or a few, third parties for the same activity.
The discussion paper states that only if a person has the required infrastructure and is a fit and proper person, the regulator registers him as an intermediary eligible to render intermediation services. However, the intermediary may outsource the activities to a third person who does not have the infrastructure or may not be a fit and proper person. This may lead to a situation where the market has only third parties to provide intermediation services while the reg-istered intermediaries confine themselves to earning rent. This creates risk for the entire market.
The discussion paper has also stated that based on an informal feedback, it is understood that a few intermediaries are currently outsourcing some of their activities related to data entry, record keeping, front-desk customer services, KYC verification etc. Since the intermediaries are registered based on their strength, outsourcing of key activities by them to unregistered third party defeats the purpose of regulation. Therefore, the key services which are crucial may be delivered by the intermediary itself. The paper also states that the informal feedback indicates that the compli-ance with securities laws, investor grievance redressal and KYC must not be outsourced under any circumstance.
S P O T L I G H T
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
10
10
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
A number of activities that are not to be outsourced by the intermediaries are also listed in the discussion paper re-leased by SEBI. These are as follows:
• Mutual funds should not outsource any investment related activities including trading;
• Merchant bankers should not outsource pricing of the issue, supervision of other intermediaries (viz. Registrars to the issue, Bankers to the issue etc.);
• Stock brokers should not outsource activities like creation of user id/login id, password generation for internet clients, order management, operation of trading terminals, operations and monitoring of bank accounts and DP accounts, pay in / pay out of funds and securities, generation and dispatch of contract notes, quarterly statement of accounts, daily margin settlement and monitoring of the said activities, control of servers and online trading platform, maintenance and monitoring of client database and client financial information, surveillance function, allotment / surrender of trading terminals, opening and closing of branches, implementation of PMLA policies, risk management system (which includes margins, trading limits, scrip / terminal enablement etc.), IT Infrastruc-ture and printing of contract notes.
• Portfolio manager should not outsource fund management and portfolio management.
• Depository participants should not outsource core management functions such as defining organisation structure, formulating policies and procedures, monitoring internal control mechanism and supervision of outsourced activi-ties, authorization for issue of DIS bookers, checker of instructions including debit instructions, pledge instruc-tions, BO modification etc.
• Bankers to an issue should not outsource of processing of applications collected (which includes data capturing, preparation of bank schedules) and clearing of instruments, controls over processes, tallying of instruments and reconciliation.
• Registrars & Transfer Agents should not outsource electronic record keeping of the investor database, basic IT infrastructure as declared at the time of registration, PMLA obligations, finance and accounts, computation or validation activities relating to corporate actions, like dividend / bonus, transactional activities, statutory activi-ties like TDS, STT etc, finalization of allottees and non-allottees, data validation with respect to the bid data cap-tured by SM / SSM and ASBA bankers with demographic details obtained from the depositories, in a public issue, mutatis mutandis in rights issue, comparison of specimen signature available with the STA with the request re-ceived from investors, processing of demat / remat / physical transfer of securities, other requests of investors like transmission of shares, issue of duplicate shares etc. and reconciliation of issued capital.
S P O T L I G H T ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
11
11
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
The discussion paper also states that— the International Organisation of Securities Commission (IOSCO) has pre-scribed a few principles on outsourcing of financial services for intermediation. These include 7 principles on the se-lection of third party, outsourcing contracts, client confidentiality and security concerns, risks associated due to con-centration of outsourced functions, termination procedures, accountability and scope of outsourcing and the right to access books and records by market intermediary and by the regulators. Based on the principles advocated by the IO-SCO and the experience of the Indian market, SEBI has proposed to have the following 9 principles for outsourcing of any intermediation service. These are:
1) An intermediary seeking to outsource activities should have in place a comprehensive policy to guide the assess-ment of whether and how those activities can be appropriately outsourced. The board of directors or equivalent body representing the market intermediary shall have the responsibility for the outsourcing policy and related overall re-sponsibility for activities undertaken under that policy.
2. The intermediary should establish a comprehensive outsourcing risk management programme to address the out-sourced activities and the relationship with the third party.
3. The intermediary should ensure that outsourcing arrangements neither diminish its ability to fulfill its obligations to customers and regulators, nor impede effective supervision by the regulators.
4. The intermediary should conduct appropriate due diligence in selecting the third party and in monitoring of its per-formance.
5. Outsourcing relationships must be governed by written contracts that clearly describe all material aspects of the outsourcing arrangement, including the rights, responsibilities and expectations of the parties to the contract, client confidentiality issues and termination procedures etc.
6. The intermediary and its third parties should establish and maintain contingency plans, including a plan for disaster recovery and periodic testing of backup facilities.
7. The intermediary should take appropriate steps to require that third party’s protect confidential information of both the intermediary and its customers from intentional or inadvertent disclosure to unauthorised persons.
8. Regulators should take into account outsourcing activities as an integral part of their ongoing assessment of the regulated entity. Regulators should assure themselves by appropriate means that any outsourcing arrangements do not hamper the ability of the intermediary to meet its regulatory requirements.
9. Regulators should be aware of the potential risks posed where the outsourced activities of multiple intermediaries are concentrated with a limited number of third parties.
Other general issues such as reporting to FIU, list of defaulters, need for self assessment of existing / proposed out-sourcing arrangements have also been cited in the discussion paper.
Specific comments / suggestions on the principles for outsourcing, the activities which can be outsourced, the activi-ties which cannot be outsourced, to whom the activities can be outsourced, the terms of outsourcing and the respon-sibilities and obligations of the intermediary and the third party in respect of the outsourced activity towards clients, regulator and market were sought by SEBI by February 5, 2011.
S P O T L I G H T S P O T L I G H T S P O T L I G H T S P O T L I G H T (((( cccc oooo nnnn tttt dddd .... .... ))))
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
12
12
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
Initiated by SEBI
1. Issuance of guidelines for introduction of futures and options on foreign stock indices
SEBI has decided to permit stock exchanges to introduce derivative contracts (Futures and Options) on foreign stock indices in the equity derivatives segment in accordance with guidelines issued by SEBI. Indian investors can trade in large indices of 24 global exchanges — including that of US, Europe and Asia — in India now. The stock exchanges listed by SEBI are: BM&FBOVESPA, Chicago Board Options Exchange, CME Group, ICE Futures U.S., International Secu-rities Exchange. MexDer, Montréal Exchange, NASDAQ OMX PHLX in the America. Australian Securities Exchange, Bursa Malaysia, Hong Kong Exchanges, Korea Exchange, Osaka Securities Exchange and Singapore Exchange, TAIFEX and To-kyo Stock Exchange Group in Asia Pacific and Borsa Italian, Eurex, Johannesburg SE, MEFF, NASDAQ OMX Nordic Ex-change, NYSE Liffe (European markets), Oslo Bors and Tel Aviv SE in Europe.
However, following guidelines have to be followed:
• In terms of trading volumes (number of contracts), derivatives on that index figure among the top 15 index de-rivatives globally or that index has a market capitalisation of at least US $100 billion.
• The index has to be broad based. An index is broad based if the index consists of a minimum of 10 constitutent stocks and no single constitutent stock has more than 25% of the weight computed in terms of free float market capi-talisation, in the index.
• After introduction of derivatives on a particular stock index, if that stock index fails to meet any of the eligibility criteria for three months consecutively, no fresh contract will be introduced on that index. However, the existing un-expired contracts would be traded till expiry and new strikes may be introduced on those contracts.
• The absolute numerical value of the underlying foreign stock index will be denominated in Indian rupees. The de-rivatives contracts on that foreign stock index will be denominated traded and settled in Indian rupees.
• The stock exchange is required to submit the risk management framework along with its application for introduc-tion of derivatives on foreign stock indices.
• The trading member/mutual funds position limits (higher of Rs. 500 crore or 15% of the total open interest in In-dex derivatives) as well as the disclosure requirement for clients whose position exceeds 15% of the open interest of the market, as applicable to domestic stock index derivatives, shall be applicable to derivatives on foreign stock indi-ces.
• The stock exchange are required to ensure that material price sensitive information and information relating to regulatory actions and corporate actions relating to constituent stocks of the foreign stock index, as available in pub-lic domain, are available to Indian investors.
• The stock exchange are required to ensure compliance with any other legal provisions relating to introduction of derivatives on foreign stock indices and obtain requisite approvals from the concerned regulatory bodies.
• Any kind of market demeanor in the market for the derivatives on foreign stock indices shall be subject to the appropriate enforcement actions, as applicable to the market for any securities.
• Trading in derivatives on Foreign Stock Indices shall be restricted to residents in India.
Source: SEBI Circular dated January 11, 2011
•
R E G U L A T O R Y C H A N G E S
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
13
13
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
2. Modification in reporting formats of FIIs’ offshore derivatives instruments (ODIs), which include
participatory notes (PNs)
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has revised the reporting format of foreign institutional inves-tors’ offshore derivative instruments (ODIs)/participatory notes (PNs) activity seeking more details of their ac-tivities in the Indian equity markets. PNs/ODIs are instruments used by overseas investors or hedge funds that are not registered with Sebi, which have Indian equities/debt and equity derivatives as underlying.
• The FIIs issuing Offshore Derivative Instruments (ODIs) and Participatory Notes (PNs) would have to switch to new reporting format from April 2011.
• The FIIs issuing such instruments would have to inform the regulator through the seven annexures Sebi has sought for any trading in the Indian market include details of ODI/PN activity and trades where the type of un-derlying Indian security is equity, debt and derivatives.
• There have to be details of assets under management (through a separate annexure) where the underlying Indian security is equity, debt and derivatives
• The reports (in form of seven annexures) have to be submitted by 10th of every month with a six month’s lag (for example, report providing details of ODI / PN activity for the month of April shall be submitted in the month of October).
• Also, the monthly summary report should capture the summary of the India ISIN-wise PN/PDI activity of the preceding month. The monthly report should be provided in the prescribed format as enclosed and submitted to SEBI by 7th of every month.
• To further streamline ODI/PN reporting of FII to FII ODI/PN activity, Sebi has mandated that in case a ODI/PNs issuer (A) issues an ODI/PN to another FII(B) that further issues the ODI/PN, then the ODI/PN reporting for A would be limited to naming B as the subscriber, on the basis that B in its FII capacity is providing a monthly ODI/PN report to Sebi. The reporting from B would meet SEBI’s requirements and avoid duplication of reporting.
• Also to tighten the know your clients (KYC) norm Sebi has revised the undertaking given by the ODIs/PNs issu-ing FIIs. The reports of ODIs/PNs activity now has to be submitted with the undertaking: “We undertake that the beneficial owner and the person(s) to whom the offshore derivative instrument is issued in compliance with the Regulation 15A of Sebi (FII) regulations. We also undertake that the KYC compliance norms have been followed
for the beneficial owner of the offshore derivative instrument.”
• Pertaining to the threshold for reporting of non-proprietary indices and custom baskets, Sebi clarified that the threshold for non-proprietary indices (for example, MSCI or MSCI EM Asia shall be taken as 20 per cent, that is, those trades need not be reported in which the materiality of Indian underlyers is less than 20 per cent of the index, even if such exposure was hedged onshore. However, custom baskets would always be reportable if hedged onshore regardless of percentage of the Indian component that is hedged onshore.
• Sebi said these reports should be filed only by the compliance officers of the FIIs, in a password-secured Ex-cel format, via e-mail. The e-mail should be sent only by the compliance officer of the respective FII to the dedi-cated e-mail ID – [email protected] with the subject line “ODI/PN Report of [FII Name and Registration No.]for the month of […]” and the password is required to be sent in a subsequent e-mail.
Source: SEBI Circular dated January 17, 2011.
R E G U L A T O R Y C H A N G E S ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
14
14
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
Initiated by RBI
• Repo rate increased from 6.25% to 6.50% w.e.f. Jan 25, 2011
• Reverse Repo rate increased from 5.25% to 5.50% w.e.f. January 25, 2011.
The Reserve Bank of India announced the third quarter review of monetary policy 2010-11 on Jan 25, 2011. The vari-ous monetary measures it took are to increase the repo rate under liquidity adjustment facility (LAF) by 25 basis points from 6.25% to 6.50% , the reverse repo rate under the LAF was increased by 25 basis points from 5.25% to 5.50%. This was effective from January 25, 2011. The bank rate and the cash reserve ratio was unchanged at 6.00% .
RBI’s monetary policy stance for the remaining period of 2010-11 has been guided by the following considera-
tions:
• Need to persist with measures to contain inflation and anchor inflationary expectations since inflationary pres-sures which were abating until November 2010 were abating but it has re-emerged again.There is also some evi-dence of rising demand side pressures which are reflected in rapid bank credit growth, robust corporate sales and rising input and output prices and buoyancy in tax revenues.
• A heightened upside risk to domestic inflation due to a sharp rise in global commodity prices.
• India’s growth having moved close to its pre-crisis growth trajectory as reflected in the 8.9% GDP growth in 2010-11 even in the face of an uncertain global recovery.
• The global economic situation particularly in the US has improved. The Euro zone still faces uncertainly but there is an overall improvement in global growth prospects
RBI’s expectations from the policy actions announced in this review:
• Contain the spill-over from rise in food and fuel prices to generalized inflation.
• Rein in rising inflationary expectations, which may have aggravated by the structural and transitory nature of food price increases.
• Be moderate enough to not disrupt growth.
• Continue to provide comfort to banks in their liquidity management operations.
R E G U L A T O R Y C H A N G E S ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
15
15
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
1. Change in auction market timings of capital market segment and revised activity schedule for
auction session
The auction market timing of capital market segment has been changed from 12:00 p.m. to 02:00 p.m. w.e.f. from auction conducted on Feb 3, 2011.
The auction period of auction settlement has been revised from the revised T+4 day rolling to T+3 rolling settle-ment. Accordingly, auction session will be conducted on T+2 day and will be settled on T+3 day.
In case of multiple settlements conducted on the same day, as specified by SEBI, the auction session for the first settlement shall be conducted on the same day and settled on the next day. The auction for the second settle-ment shall be conducted on the next day along with the shortages / auction of that day. The settlement of the same shall happen on the subsequent day. The revised settlement cycle for auction shall be effective for the trading done on February 1, 2011.
The existing auction settlement cycle of T+4 shall be followed for auction trades on January 3, 2011. The settle-ment shortages for trades done on January 31, 2011 and February 1, 2011 shall be auction together on February 3, 2011. The same shall be conducted under a single auction session and settled on February 4, 2011.
2. Change in auction timings of SLB scheme
The auction timing of SLB scheme has been changed from 12:00 p.m. to 2 p.m. This would be effective from auc-tion conducted on February 3, 2011 for reverse leg settlement of February 3, 2011.
N S E N E W S
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
16
16
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
1. BM&FBOVESPA launches the Corporate Governance Trade Index (IGCT)
On January 3, 2011 BM&FBOVESPA started the real time calculation and publication of the Corporate Governance Trade Index (IGCT), the Exchange’s 18th index.
It calculates the daily performance of shares issued by companies that have voluntarily adopted differentiated corporate governance standards and which meet the inclusion standards that have been established by the in-dex’s methodology.
The new index is different from the Corporate Governance Index (IGC) in that it considers liquidity as an inclu-sion criterion. The IGC - Special Corporate Governance Stock Index was designed to measure the return of a theoretical portfolio composed of shares of companies with a good level of corporate governance. The IGC Trade index (IGCT) is based on the IGC index (Índice de Ações com Governança Corporativa Diferenciada)—an essential indicator of the performance of stocks issued by companies that voluntarily adopt differentiated standards of corporate governance.
The new index will be updated every four months, and is different to the IGC in that it considers liquidity criteria such as inclusion in a group of stocks whose negotiability indices added represent 98% of the total value of all individual indices; and trading session participation equal or more than 95% in the period.
The same company can have more than one stock in the portfolio, as long as each stock meets the inclusion cri-teria separately. What is more, companies with less than 12 months of listing are only eligible if they have more than six months of trading and have at least 95% presence in the trading session during the last six months of the analysis period.
Source: www. bmfbovespa.com
I N T E R N A T I O N A L N E W S
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
17
17
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL NSE ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
NAME DESIGNATION DEPARTMENT TEL. NO. EXTN.
Dr. Vijay L Kelkar Chairman 26598202 7053
Mr. Ravi Narain Managing Director and CEO 26598122 7050
Ms. Chitra Ramkrishna Jt. Managing Director 26598123 7051
Mr. J. Ravichandran Director Finance & Accounts, Legal & Secretarial 26598203 5005
Mr. Ravi Apte Chief Technology Officer 26598316 5004
Mr. R . Nanda Kumar Sr. Vice President National Commodity Clearing Limited, New Projects & International Business
26598223 3000
Mr. R. Sundararaman Sr. Vice President National Securities Clearing Corporation Ltd. 26598212 4006
Mr. Ravi Varanasi Sr. Vice President Investigation, Surveillance, Data Analytics, RO-Ahmedabad, Inspection & Compliance
26598225 5003
Mr. Yatrik R Vin Sr. Vice President Finance & Accounts 26598213 3008
Mr. Chandrashekar Mukherjee Vice President Human Resource 26598437 3010
Mr. Hari K Vice President Listing & Membership 26598452 5058
Ms. Kamala Vice President Inspection, Compliance, & Investor Service Cell
26598220 3006
Mr. Nirmal Mohanty Head SBU - Education 26598372 3007
Mr. Suprabhat Lala Vice President Trade - (Capital Market, F&O, Currency De-rivatives & WDM), CRM & Marketing
26598154 6026
Mr. Suresh Narayan Vice President India Index Services & Products Ltd. & DotEx International Limited
26598221 2004
Mr. T Venkat Rao Vice President & Head – Northern Region
Regional Office - Delhi (011) 23344335 127
Mr. Vidhu Shekhar Vice President New Products & Six Sigma Initiatives 26598209 4007
Mr. Arup Mukherjee Asst. Vice President SBU - Education 26598217 3002
Mr. C. N. Upadhyay Asst. Vice President Inspection & Compliance 26598210 5002
Mr. Mahesh Haldipur Asst. Vice President Premises 26598211 4003
Mr. Mayur Sindhwad Asst. Vice President NOW, Dotex International Ltd. & Web Team 26598312 3102
Mr. Nilesh Tinaikar Asst. Vice President Development 26598445 5090
Ms. Nisha Subhash Asst. Vice President Investigation 26598162 5088
Mr. R Jayakumar Asst. Vice President Secretarial 26598222 5023
Ms. Rana Usman Asst. Vice President NSCCL - Securities, Corporate Bonds, F&O and SLB
26598267 4048
Mr. Ravi Tyagi Officer on Special Duty SME Project 26598435 4002
Mr. Ravindra Mohan Bathula Asst. Vice President Legal 26598197 5047
Mr. S R V S Nagendra Kumar Asst. Vice President Development, NSCCL 26598455 1207
Mr. Sandip Mehta
Asst. Vice President CTCL 26598150 6059
Mr. Vitthal More Asst. Vice President New Projects 26598378 5537
18
18
MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL NSE
N S E N E W S L E T T E R 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
NAME DESIGNATION DEPARTMENT TEL. NO. EXTN.
Mr. Achal Jaiswal Chief Manager & Head - Eastern Region
Regional Office - Kolkata (033)40400444 444
Mr Ajith Kumar V Chief Manager Administration & Development 26598146 4094
Mr. Amit Bhobe Chief Manager New Projects & NCCL - 3319
Mr Amol Mahajan Chief Manager Finance & Accounts 26598139/40 3081
Mr. Arvind Goyal Chief Manager NSCCL - Currency Derivatives 26598310 4130
Mr. Avinash Kharkar Chief Manager Investigation 26598366 5150
Mr. Bireshwar Chatterjee Chief Manager Data Analytics 26598366 5146
Mr. Gaurav Kapoor Chief Manager CRM 26598208 1227
Ms Himabindu Vakkalanka Chief Manager Development 26598453 5155
Mr. Huzefa Mahuvawala Chief Manager NSCCL -Risk Management 26598168 4040
Mr. Janardhan Gujaran Chief Manager F&O - Trade 26598152 6029
Ms Jayna Gandhi Chief Manager Finance & Accounts 26598141 3066
Mr. Johnson Joseph Chiriyath Chief Manager Listing 26598452 5057
Mr. Kiran Sawant Chief Manager NSCCL - Collaterals 26598265 4088
Mr. Kiran Dusane Chief Manager Premises 26598454 4112
Mr. Prashanto Banerjee Chief Manager Marketing 26598350 1228
Ms. Rehana D'Souza Chief Manager Membership 26598295 4116
Mr. Sammit Joshi Chief Manager India Index Services & Products Ltd.
26598386 2027
Mr. Sandeep Manoharan Chief Manager NOW, Dotex International Ltd. 26598313 3089
Ms. Seema Nayak Chief Manager Surveillance 26598166 6062
Mr. Shekhar Rao Chief Manager Finance & Accounts 26598143 3051
Ms. Sonali Karnik Chief Manager Currency Derivatives - Trade 26598131 6028
Mr. Sunil Gawde Chief Manager Capital Market - Trade 26598448 6033
Ms. Sunitha Anand Chief Manager & Head – Southern Region
Regional Office - Chennai & Hy-derabad
(044) 28332512 2100
Ms. Sushama Bhagchandani Chief Manager Finance & Accounts 26598144 3041
Mr. Tojo Banerjee Chief Manager Regional Office - Delhi (011)23344505 128
Mr. Vinayak Shenoy Chief Manager Finance & Accounts 26598139 3076
Ms. Bhawika Wanchoo Manager & In-charge - Ahmedabad Regional Office - Ahmedabad 079) 26584578
-
19
19
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL NSE INFOTECH SERVICES LTD.
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
Name Designation Projects Tel. No. Ext
Mr. N Muralidaran CEO 26598205 2001
Mr. G. M. Shenoy Senior Vice President Projects 26598207 2000
Mr. M. R. Krishnan Vice President Infrastructure 26598132 2003
Ms. Hema Iyer Vice President Risk Management 26598254 2002
Mr. Mahesh Soparkar Associate Vice President Projects, DBA/SysAdmin 26598136 2005
Ms. Mamatha Rangaprasd Associate Vice President Trade 26598351 1168
Mr. P. R. Visvas Assistant Vice President Quality, DWH 26598352 1189
Mr. Mahesh Basrur Assistant Vice President FOCASS, NCSS 26598100 2072
Mr. Deviprasad Singh Assistant Vice President Telecom 26598262 2122
Mr. Amit Hatalkar Assistant Vice President Web, SBU-Education 26598291 1119
Ms. Smrati Kaushik Assistant Vice President Trade 26598271 6082
Mr. Viral Mody Assistant Vice President Retooling 26598100 2078
Mr. Hitesh Shah Senior Manager DBA /SysAdmin/SysOperations 26598270 2102
Mr. Sujoy Das Senior Manager Index 26598275 2032
Mr. Sudhir Sawant Senior Manager Project Management Office 26598100 2112
Mr. Pranav Gupta Senior Manager Risk Management 26598349 1165
Mr. Rajanish Nagwekar Senior Manager NGPT 26598270 2130
Mr. Nipun Dave Senior Manager Neatplus, TAP 26598258 2024
Mr. Bineet Jha Senior Manager HWARE SUPPORT 26598100 2077
Mr. Mathew Joseph K Senior Manager NCSS 26598100 2055
Mr. Benny Sebastian Senior Manager Membership, Inspection, List-ing 26598100 1142
Mr. Umesh Agroya Senior Manager Telecom 26598277 2105
Mr. Swaminathan Narayan Senior Manager APPSG 26598100 2134
Mr. Manoj Joshi Manager NOW 26598231 1565
Ms. Anuja Joshi Manager BCP 26598100 1124
Mr. Suresh Chandani Manager Trade 26598100 6083
Mr. Shibu Tomy Manager NCSS 26598100 1154
Ms. Pranali Taskar Manager Telecom 26598277 2096
Mr. Joy John Manager BCP - Chennai 044-28473702 141
Mr. Narayan Neelakanthan Manager Telecom 26598229 2113
Ms. Bernadine Swamy Manager HRD 26598100 2135
Mr. Anoop Kumar Rawat Consultant DBA 26598100 2094
Mr. Nitin Gupte Manager Telecom 26598100 2087
Mr. Sandeep Kumar Gupta Manager APPSG 26598100 2085
Mr. Prasad Addagatla Manager SysAdmin/SysOperations 26598320 6089
Mr. Suraj P Bangera Manager Web 26598100 1110
20
20
N S E N E W S L E T T E R
MANAGERIAL PERSONNEL NSE INFOTECH SERVICES LTD. ( c o n t d . . )
A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 F e b r u a r y 2 0 1 1
Name Designation Projects Tel. No. Ext
Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh Manager TECH - Delhi (011) 23346978 109
Mr. Sagar Joshi Manager Project Management Office 26598100 2111
Mr. Shreekantha Velankar Manager DWH 26598100 5594
Mr. Balakrishnan M Manager APPSG 26598100 2019
Mr. Aditya Agarwal Manager Architecture 26598258 2141
Ms. Meena Hajare Manager Quality 26598407 1123
Mr. Nishant Jha Manager OPMS 26598100 1166
Ms. Veena Khilnani Manager DBA 26598270 2104
Mr. Vinit Naik Manager PRISM 26598100 1131
Ms. Vishakha Shenoy Manager Survellience 26598100 1160
Ms. Kavita Shanbhag Manager Listing, NFA/FAMS, WDM 26598100 2058
Ms. Swarashree Joglekar Manager C2N 26598100 1188
Mr. Shailendra Aggarwal Manager HWARE SUPPORT 26598100 1570
Mr. Sarang Dhoble Manager Trade 26598100 6084