Upload
buinhan
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A quantitative analysis of plant community structure
in an abandoned rubber plantations on Kho-Hong Hill,
southern Thailand
Sara Bumrungsri1, Ekapong Sripao-raya2 and Charan Leelatiwong3
AbstractBumrungsri, S., Sripao-raya, E. and Leelatiwong, C.
A quantitative analysis of plant community structure in an abandoned rubber
plantations on Kho-Hong Hill, southern ThailandSongklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., 2006, 28(3) : 479-491
The present study aimed to characterize plant community structure of rubber plantations abandoned
26 years previously and now a protected area of Prince of Songkla University on the west slope of Kho-Hong
Hill. Trees whose girth at breast high were at least 30 cm were recorded from thirty-one plots (10*10 m) which
were laid out systematically at every 100 m along three transects. Among native trees, this plant community
is dominated by Schima wallichii Choisy, Castanopsis schefferiana Hance, Memecylon edule Roxb., Diospyrosfrutescens Blume, and Diplospora malaccensis Hook.f. Trees of the families Myrtaceae, Theaceae, Clusiaceae,
Fagaceae, and Rubiaceae, and saplings of Clusiaceae, Myrtaceae, Theaceae, Rubiaceae and Euphorbiaceae
were the most common. This plant community was characterized as a late seral stage post-cultivation
succession. The basal area of rubber trees was positively significantly related to the species richness of native
trees but negatively related to the density of native trees in each plot. Although abandoned rubber plantations
create environmental conditions which effectively catalyze forest succession, dense rubber trees could slow
succession of native trees by competition for resources. Further ecological, educational and recreational
studies are discussed. Zoning this area to be a strict nature reserve and a conservation area is recommended.
Key words : rubber plantation, forest succession, secondary forest, Kho-Hong Hill
1Ph.D.(Conservation Biology), 2M.Sc.(Zoology), 3M.Sc.(Botany), Department of Biology, Faculty of Science,
Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, 90112 Thailand.
Corresponding e-mail: [email protected]
Received, 26 July 2005 Accepted, 17 November 2005
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006 480
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.
∫∑§—¥¬àÕ
“√– ∫”√ÿß»√’ ‡Õ°æß»å »√’‡ª“√¬– ·≈– ®√—≠ ≈’≈µ‘«ß»å
‚§√ß √â“ß —ߧ¡æ◊™„πæ◊Èπ∑’Ë «π¬“ßæ“√“∑‘Èß√â“ß∫π‡¢“§ÕÀß å ¿“§„µâ¢Õߪ√–‡∑»‰∑¬
«. ߢ≈“π§√‘π∑√å «∑∑. 2549 28(3) : 479-491
°“√»÷°…“§√—Èßπ’È¡’«—µ∂ÿª√– ߧå‡æ◊ËÕ«‘‡§√“–À傧√ß √â“ß —ߧ¡æ◊™„πæ◊Èπ∑’Ë «π¬“ß∑’Ë∑‘Èß√â“ß¡“ 26 ªï∫√‘‡«≥‡™‘ß
‡¢“§ÕÀß å ´÷Ë߇ªìπ‡¢µÕπÿ√—°…å∏√√¡™“µ‘¢Õß¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬ ߢ≈“π§√‘π∑√å ∑”°“√«“ß·ª≈ß¢π“¥ 10x10 ‡¡µ√ ∑ÿ°Ê
√–¬– 100 ‡¡µ√µ“¡‡ âπ·π« 3 ‡ âπ «—¥¢π“¥·≈–®”·π°™π‘¥µâπ‰¡â∑’Ë¡’¢π“¥‡ âπ√Õ∫«ß∑’Ë√–¥—∫Õ°µ—Èß·µà 30 ´¡.
¢÷Èπ‰ª æ∫«à“‰¡âæ◊Èπ‡¡◊Õß∑’Ë¡’§à“¥—™π’§«“¡ ”§—≠ Ÿß§◊Õ ¡—ßµ“π (Schima wallichii Choisy) °àÕ‡¢’Ȭ«À¡Ÿ (Castanopsis
schefferiana Hance) æ≈Õ߇À¡◊Õ¥ (Memecylon edule Roxb.) æ≈—∫°≈⫬ (Diospyros frutescens Blume) ‡¡◊ËÕ
æ‘®“√≥“„π√–¥—∫«ß»åæ∫«à“ «ß»å∑’ˇ¥àπ§◊Õ «ß»å Myrtaceae Theaceae Clusiaceae Fagaceae ·≈– Rubiaceae ¢≥–∑’Ë
≈Ÿ°‰¡â„π«ß»å∑’Ëæ∫¡“°§◊Õ«ß»å Clusiaceae Myrtaceae Theaceae Rubiaceae ·≈– Euphorbiaceae ªÉ“∑¥·∑ππ’Èπà“®–
Õ¬Ÿà„π√–¬–°“√∑¥·∑π¢—Èπ∑⓬ ¢π“¥¢Õßæ◊Èπ∑’ËÀπ⓵—¥√«¡¢Õ߉¡â¬“ßæ“√“¡’§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å∑“ß∫«°°—∫§«“¡À≈“°™π‘¥
¢Õ߉¡âª√–®”∂‘Ëπ·µà¡’§«“¡ —¡æ—π∏å∑“ß≈∫°—∫§«“¡Àπ“·πàπ¢Õ߉¡âª√–®”∂‘Ëπ„π·ª≈ß»÷°…“ ∂÷ß·¡â«à“ «π¬“ß∑’Ë∑‘Èß
√â“ß®–¡’ ¿“æ·«¥≈âÕ¡∑’˙૬‡√àß°“√øóôπµ—«¢Õߪɓµ“¡∏√√¡™“µ‘ µâπ¬“ßæ“√“∑’ËÀπ“·πàπÕ“®®–≈¥§«“¡‡√Á«¢Õß°“√
øóôπµ—«¢Õ߉¡âªÉ“‚¥¬°“√·°àß·¬àß∑√—欓°√ ‡π◊ËÕß®“°¡’°“√„™âæ◊Èπ∑’Ëπ’ȇæ◊ËÕ°“√»÷°…“∑“ß𑇫»«‘∑¬“ ‡ªìπ·À≈à߇√’¬π√Ÿâ
·≈–‡æ◊ËÕ —π∑π“°“√ ®÷ߧ«√·∫àß°“√„™âæ◊Èπ∑’ˇªìπ‡¢µ ß«π·≈–‡¢µÕπÿ√—°…å
¿“§«‘™“™’««‘∑¬“ §≥–«‘∑¬“»“ µ√å ¡À“«‘∑¬“≈—¬ ߢ≈“π§√‘π∑√å Õ”‡¿ÕÀ“¥„À≠à ®—ßÀ«—¥ ߢ≈“ 90112
Throughout the tropics, enormous areas ofprimary forest have been converted to agriculturalland and this phenomenon is a major contributorfor biodiversity loss (Bryant et al., 1997). In someinstances, cultivated land is abandoned and replacedby secondary forest. Although it differs fromoriginal forest, this post-cultivation secondaryforest supports a number of forest taxa, even whenisolated from intact forest. Like other tropicalcountries, Thailand has lost a large portion of itsforest in the last few decades. Fifty three percentof the country's area was covered with forest in1961, but this had declined to 33.15% in 2000(Department of National Park, Wildlife and PlantConservation, 2003). Rubber or 'yang-pa-ra'(Heavea brasiliensis Willd. ex A. Juss.) plantations,the major cultivation practice in southern Thailand,replace large tracts of tropical forest. Rubberplantation increased from 1.58 million ha in 1978to 2.0 million ha in 1992. In that year, 25% of thearea of southern Thailand was covered with rubberplantations whereas only 18% was forest (RoyalForest Department, 1993).
Kho-Hong Hill, the largest isolated forestremnant close to the city of Hat Yai, was oncecovered with tropical forest, however, the majorityof the hill area (>50%) is currently covered byrubber plantations. During 1976-1980, Prince ofSongkla University bought some rubber plantations,and sixty hectares of them had no further disturb-ance or cultivation, so that secondary forest becameestablished. This secondary forest is now protectedas the university's nature reserve. This protectedforest is a catchment for water supply to theuniversity and has become increasingly used forresearch, education, recreation, and plant conserv-ation. An inventory carried out by Maxwell (1986)indicated relatively high diversity of at least 596species of vascular plants on this hill. Severalundergraduate research projects have been done inthe area, mainly on animals such as birds, termites,ants and canopy beetles (Charoensap, 1996;Ratcharote, 1999; Sritangnan, 1999; Wattanasit etal., 2005). Further research on forest regeneration,other ecological studies and nature interpretationare planned (Prince of Songkla University, 2002).
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.481
However, the area is still lacking a quantitativedescription of the forest community. It is alsoimportant to describe the community structure ofabandoned rubber plantations of known age, sinceit may provide insights into the process of forestrecovery. In addition, it is interesting to establishthe extent to which a high density of planted rubbertrees affects the establishment of native plants. Theobjectives of the present study are to describe thecommunity structure of the secondary forest in anabandoned rubber plantation, and to determine therelationship between the density of rubber trees andthe density and diversity of native plants.
Study area
The present study was carried out in aprotected forest of Prince of Songkla University onKho-Hong Hill (07º 00.4' N, 100º 30.7' E.). Thisisolated hill lies in a North-South direction and issurrounded by settlements and agricultural land.Most of the study area (60 ha) was an abandonedrubber plantation mixed with a disturbed forest.These plantations had been abandoned since theywere bought by the university during 1976-80. Thestudy area is characterized with slight undulatingterrain ranging in altitude between 30 and 100 masl, situated on the western side of the hill. Thesummit rises to 371 m. Former rubber plantationscovered most of the lower elevations and flat areas.The 10 years climate was hot (mean minimum-mean maximum temperatures = 24.1-32.5ºC,average 28.3ºC) and relatively humid (averagerelative humidity of 72%) with 2,118 mm meanannual rainfall. Generally, there was a three monthdry season (February to April) with rainfall lessthan 100 mm, whereas rain was heavy in October-December (Kho-Hong Meteorically Station, 2004).This tropical climate is classified as tropical wetseasonal according to Walsh (1996). The soilseries belonged to the Ranong-Phato Association,subgroup typic paleudults. They are dark brownto brown over yellowish brown, very shallow/shallow to moderately deep, well drained andhave moderate permeability. Soils are poor withmoderately low organic matter (Soil Survey
Division, 1973). Bedrocks are heavily crushed andweathered carboniferous mudstones (Maxwell,1986).
Methods
Plots of 0.01 ha (10*10 m) were laid outsystematically at every 100 m along three transects(800-1200 m long) in a North-South direction(Figure 1). Transects were 150 m apart. When plotswere placed on slopes, their size was adjusted byx = 10tan φ where x is the adjusted length, and φis the degree of slope. Trees whose girth at breasthigh (1.3 m) (GBH) was at least 30 cm wereidentified and recorded for their GBH. Saplingsand shrub (GBH less than 30 cm but greater orequal to 5 cm) were identified and counted in a4*4 m subplot set at the south-west corner in eachplot. Voucher specimens of unknown species werecollected for later identification by comparingwith specimen in the Prince of Songkla Herbarium.Aspect and location of each plot were also noted.
A number of quantitative attributes werecalculated. These were density (D) (total numberof tree of species x/total sampling area), frequency(F) (number of plots with species x/ total numberof plots), dominance (basal area of species x). Thecontribution of each species to the forest communityin relation to other species was determined asrelative density (R
den) (density of species x/ density
of all species), relative frequency (Rf) (frequency
of species x/ sum frequency of all species), relativedominance (R
do) (basal area of species x/ basal area
of all species). The performance of each specieswas determined from the sum of relative contri-butions referred to as the Importance Value Index(IVI) when IVI = R
den + R
f + R
do.
A profile diagram of trees in a selected10x30 m plot was drawn and the composition andthe vertical forest structure were described.
To investigate the possible effect of rubbertrees on native trees and saplings, total rubber treebasal area and the number of rubber trees werecorrelated with the number of native saplingspecies, the number of native sapling individuals,the number of native tree species and number of
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006 482
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.
Figure 1. Distribution of sampling plots along thre transects in N-S direction over
the protected nature reserve of Prince of Songkla University.
native individual trees in each plot. All statisticalanalyses were carried out using SPSS (11.0).
Results
Quantitative analysis
Two hundred and thirty seven individualsof 49 tree species with GBH equal or larger than30 cm were measured in thirty-one 10*10m plots(0.31 ha). In addition, 249 individuals of 52 speciesof sapling and shrub were found in 31 plots of4*4 m (0.05 ha). From a total native tree speciesdensity of 529 trees/ha, Schima wallichii Choisy,Castanopsis schefferiana Hance, Memecylon eduleRoxb. and Diospyros frutescens Blume showedthe highest density from 35.5-54.8 trees/ha whilethe density of rubber tree was 235.5 trees/ha.Seventy percent of native species were limited in
distribution to only 1 or 2 plots. The four specieswith highest density and Diplospora malaccensisHook.f. also had the widest distribution amongnative species and contributed 19-29 % of all plots.The estimated total basal area of all native treeswas 11.14 m
2/ha while the basal area of rubber
trees is 7.87 m2/ha. The majority of trees (48%)
had GBH between 30 and 39 cm. The GBH of sixtrees from five species exceeded 100 cm. Thesewere Albizea splendens Miq. (200 cm), Syzygiumglaucum (King) P. Chantaranothai & J.Parn. (160cm), Aquilaria malaccensis Lamk. (157 cm),Castanopsis schefferiana Hance (143.5 cm), andrubber tree (128 and 105 cm). Outside the sampledplots, several trees were as large as 300 cm GBHsuch as Instia palembanica Miq., Sindoraechinocalyx Prain and Horsfieldia macrocomaWarb. In terms of summed basal area, Castanopsis
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.483
schefferiana Hance, Schima wallichii Choisy andAlbizea splendens Miq. were dominant. Inconclusion, Schima wallichii Choisy, Castanopsisschefferiana Hance, Diospyros frutescens Blume,Memecylon edule Roxb. and Diplosporamalaccensis Hook.f. had the highest IVI (30.5,28.67, 17.57, 17.42 and 14.26, respectively, Table1).
At the family level of native trees, Myrtaceae(12.1%), Theaceae (11%), Clusiaceae (9.7%),Fagaceae (9.4%), Ebenaceae, Leguminosae andRubiaceae (5%) had the highest IVI among the 25families recorded. These families contributed morethan 50% of all the IVI among native trees.
From a total sapling and shrub density of5,020 individuals/ha, Mesua kunstleri (King)Kosterm. (806 ind./ha), Syzygium zeylanicum (L.)DC. (362 ind./ha), Syzygium lineatum (DC.) Merr.& L.M.Perry, Syzygium cerasiforme (Blume) Merr.& L.M.Perry, Schima wallichii Choisy (282.3 ind./ha) had the highest density. Saplings of rubber treeswere also well established (282.3 ind./ha) (Table2). At the family level, sapling of Clusiaceae (12%)Theaceae (11%), Myrtaceae (9%), Ebenaceaeand Fagaceae (9%) and Memecylaceae (7%)dominated the studied area.
Description of the forest community structure
based on the profile diagram
Vertical stratification (Figure 2) of the forestwas not clearly defined. Three strata probablyoccured; top layer, middle layer and shrub layer.The top layer was 18-25 m high and was domin-ated by Castanopsis schefferiana Hance, Schimawallichii Choisy, Syzygium glaucum (King) P.Chantaranothai & J. Parn., Syzygium claviflorum(Roxb.) Wall. ex A.M. Cowan & Cowan, Syzygiumlineatum (DC.) Merr.& L.M.Perry,Vitex pinnataL., Sindora echinocalyx Prain, Cynometraramiflora L., Elaeocarpus floribundus Blume,Swintonia floribunda Griff. and Albizea spendensMiq.. When present, rubber trees occupied the toplayer. The middle layer was between 7-15 m highwhich was dominated by Garcinia nigrolineataPlanch. ex. T. Anderson, Garcinia merguensisWight, Diplospora malaccensis Hook.f., Diospyros
frutescens Blume, Crypteronia paniculata Blume,Memecylon edule Roxb., Calophyllum calaba L.,Psydrax nitida (Craib) K.M. Wong. A number ofshrubs including Mesua kunstleri (King) Kosterm.,Mallotus oblongifolius M˙ull. Arg., Macarangalowii King ex Hook.f., Ixora javanica DC.,Greenea corymbosa (Jack.) K. Schum., Crotonargyratus Blume, Memecylon edule Roxb.,Streblus taxoides (Heynes) Kurz and Prunus grisea(C. Muell.) Kalkman dominated the shrub layer(1-3 m heigh). Seedlings of canopy and subcanopytrees such as Hopea ferrea Laness., Aquilariamalaccensis Lamk., Garcinia spp., Diospyrosspp., and Canthium spp. were common. Woodyclimbers such as Spatholobus harmandii Gagnep.,Linostoma pauciflorum Griff., Ancistrocladustectorius (Lour.) Merr., and Artabotrys sp. werepresent. Rattan (Calamus spp.), Amomumuliginosum K.D. Koenig, Elettariopsis curtisiiBaker, Etlingera littoralis (A. Koenig) Giseke,Phrynium pubinerve Blume, Pandanus humilisLour., Molineria latifolia Herb. ex Kurz, Licualaspinosa Thunb., Homalomena sagittifolia Jungh.ex Schott and Alocasia lowii Hook. were also oftenfound in moist areas along temporary streams.Remnant large trees including Cynometra malac-censis L., Sindora echinocalyx Prain, Eleocarpusfloribunda Blume, Instia palembanica Miq. werepresent along the main stream. Creeping bamboo(Dinochloa scandens (Blume) Kuntze) was alsocommon, especially along hill-ridges. In tree gaps,seedlings of Macaranga spp. were common whilea number of early pioneer species such as Alstoniamacrophylla Wall. ex G. Don, Mallotus paniculatusM˙uell. Arg., Microcos tomentosa Sm., Erythro-xylum cuneatum (Miq.) Kurz, Peltophorumdasyrachis (Miq.) Kurz and Macaranga triloba(Reinw. ex Blume) M˙uell.Arg. were present alongdistinct forest edges. Snags were hardly found.
Although the forest covers a relatively smallarea (ca. 60 ha), a reconnaissance survey indicatedsome variations in dominant species in relation tophysical microhabitats. On hill-ridges which werecharacterized by relatively shallow soil overmudrock fragments, Castanopsis schefferianaHance, Crypteronia paniculata Blume, Syzygium
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006 484
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.T
ab
le 1
.Im
port
an
ce v
alu
e in
dex
of
nati
ve
tree
s w
hose
gir
th a
t b
reast
hig
h a
t le
ast
30 c
m fr
om
31 p
lots
(10*10 m
.) i
n a
ban
don
ed r
ub
ber
pla
nta
tion
s of
Pri
nce
of
Son
gk
la U
niv
ersi
ty.
S
cien
tifi
c n
am
esV
ern
acu
lar
Den
sity
Fre
qu
ency
Basa
l are
aR
elati
ve
Rel
ati
ve
Rel
ati
ve
Imp
ort
an
ce
nam
es(t
ree/
ha)
(m2/h
a)
Den
sity
Fre
qu
ency
Dom
inan
ceV
alu
e In
dex
Schi
ma
wal
lichi
i Cho
isy
Man
gtan
54.8
429
.03
1.24
10.3
79.
0011
.13
30.5
0C
asta
nops
is s
chef
feri
ana
Han
ceK
ow k
euw
mu
45.1
619
.35
1.57
8.54
6.00
14.1
328
.67
Mem
ecyl
on e
dule
Rox
b.Pl
ong
mue
at35
.48
19.3
50.
546.
716.
004.
8617
.57
Dio
spyr
os fr
utes
cens
Blu
me
Phla
p kl
uai
35.4
822
.58
0.41
6.71
7.00
3.71
17.4
2D
iplo
spor
a m
alac
cens
is H
ook.
f.22
.58
19.3
50.
444.
276.
004.
0014
.26
Syzy
gium
gla
ucum
(K
ing)
P.C
hant
aran
otha
i & J
.Par
n.D
aeng
12.9
06.
450.
952.
442.
008.
5212
.96
Gar
cini
a m
ergu
ensi
s W
ight
Nua
n25
.81
9.68
0.35
4.88
3.00
3.18
11.0
6M
icro
cos
tom
ento
sa S
m.
Phla
pphl
a3.
233.
231.
030.
611.
009.
2210
.83
Alb
izea
spl
ende
ns M
iq.
22.5
812
.90
0.28
4.27
4.00
2.48
10.7
5C
rypt
eron
ia p
anic
ulat
um B
lum
eK
a aa
m16
.13
12.9
00.
233.
054.
002.
099.
14A
cron
ychi
a pe
dunc
ulat
a (L
.) M
iq.
Ka
uam
19.3
59.
680.
273.
663.
002.
449.
10Si
ndor
a ec
hino
caly
x Pr
ain
Ma
kha
12.9
06.
450.
372.
442.
003.
377.
80Vi
tex
pinn
ata
L.
Tin
nok
3.23
3.23
0.63
0.61
1.00
5.68
7.29
Aqu
ilari
a m
alac
cens
is L
amk.
Mai
hom
12.9
09.
680.
162.
443.
001.
426.
86G
arci
nia
nigr
olin
eata
Pla
nch.
ex.
T. A
nder
son
Cha
mua
ng12
.90
6.45
0.20
2.44
2.00
1.80
6.24
Syzy
gium
gra
nde
(Wig
ht)
Wal
p.M
ao16
.13
3.23
0.17
3.05
1.00
1.55
5.60
Syzy
gium
cer
asifo
rme
(Blu
me)
Mer
r. &
L.M
.Per
ry9.
686.
450.
131.
832.
001.
195.
01C
alop
hyllu
m c
alab
a L
.9.
686.
450.
121.
832.
001.
114.
93P
runu
s gr
isea
(C
. Mue
ll.)
Kal
kman
Nuu
t ton
9.68
6.45
0.08
1.83
2.00
0.69
4.52
Syzy
gium
line
atum
(D
C.)
Mer
r. &
L.M
.Per
ryK
hwaa
t6.
456.
450.
121.
222.
001.
074.
29Sy
zygi
um z
elan
icum
(L
.) D
C.
Sam
et d
aeng
9.68
3.23
0.13
1.83
1.00
1.14
3.97
Syzy
gium
syz
ygio
ides
(M
iq.)
Mer
r. &
L.M
.Per
ry6.
456.
450.
081.
222.
000.
703.
92M
esua
kun
stle
ri (
Kin
g) K
oste
rm.
Bun
nnak
paa
9.68
3.23
0.12
1.83
1.00
1.04
3.87
Hop
ea fe
rrea
Pie
rre
Ta k
hian
hin
9.68
3.23
0.11
1.83
1.00
0.98
3.81
Ela
eoca
rpus
flor
ibun
dus
Blu
me
Kaa
lon
6.45
3.23
0.16
1.22
1.00
1.47
3.69
Unk
now
n 1
(Thy
mel
iace
ae)
6.45
6.45
0.05
1.22
2.00
0.46
3.68
Unk
now
n 2
6.45
6.45
0.05
1.22
2.00
0.44
3.66
Cyn
omet
ra m
alac
cens
is L
.M
ang
khaa
k9.
683.
230.
071.
831.
000.
643.
47C
haet
ocar
pus
cast
anoc
arpu
s T
hwai
tes
Khe
e no
n3.
233.
230.
190.
611.
001.
723.
33E
laeo
carp
us p
etio
latu
s W
all.
ex C
. Mue
ll.D
ee n
guu
6.45
3.23
0.10
1.22
1.00
0.93
3.15
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.485
Ta
ble
1.
(co
nti
nu
ed)
S
cien
tifi
c n
am
esV
ern
acu
lar
Den
sity
Fre
qu
ency
Basa
l are
aR
elati
ve
Rel
ati
ve
Rel
ati
ve
Imp
ort
an
ce
nam
es(t
ree/
ha)
(m2/h
a)
Den
sity
Fre
qu
ency
Dom
inan
ceV
alu
e In
dex
Dio
spyr
os s
umat
rana
Miq
.L
ak k
hoei
lak
klue
a6.
453.
230.
071.
221.
000.
592.
81C
rato
xylu
m c
ochi
nchi
nens
e B
lum
eT
iu k
liang
6.45
3.23
0.05
1.22
1.00
0.46
2.68
Kne
ma
glob
ular
ia W
arb.
Lue
at r
aet
3.23
3.23
0.10
0.61
1.00
0.89
2.50
Art
ocar
pus
elas
ticus
Rei
nw. e
x B
lum
eK
a ok
3.23
3.23
0.05
0.61
1.00
0.47
2.08
Mal
lotu
s pa
nicu
latu
s M
˙ ull.
Arg
.So
i daa
o3.
233.
230.
050.
611.
000.
472.
08E
ryth
roxy
lum
cun
eatu
m (
Miq
.) K
urz
Kra
i tho
ng3.
233.
230.
050.
611.
000.
412.
02P
ittos
poru
m fe
rrug
ineu
m A
it.3.
233.
230.
040.
611.
000.
371.
98U
nkno
wn
33.
233.
230.
040.
611.
000.
351.
96Sw
into
nia
schw
enck
ii Te
ijsm
. & B
inn.
Kaa
n th
ong
3.23
3.23
0.04
0.61
1.00
0.35
1.96
Dio
spyr
os s
p. 1
3.23
3.23
0.04
0.61
1.00
0.33
1.94
Mor
inda
elli
ptic
a R
idl.
Yo
thue
an3.
233.
230.
040.
611.
000.
321.
93M
orin
da s
pp.
Yo
3.23
3.23
0.02
0.61
1.00
0.21
1.82
Met
aden
ia tr
icho
tom
a B
akh.
f.K
ham
in to
n3.
233.
230.
030.
611.
000.
301.
91C
alle
rya
atro
purp
urea
(W
all.)
Sch
ot3.
233.
230.
030.
611.
000.
301.
91R
inor
ea a
ngui
fera
Kun
tze
Ngo
h pa
a3.
233.
230.
020.
611.
000.
221.
83C
leis
tant
hus
sum
atra
nus
M˙ ue
ll. A
rg.
Fin
daen
g3.
233.
230.
020.
611.
000.
211.
82G
arci
nia
hom
bron
iana
Pie
rre
Waa
3.23
3.23
0.02
0.61
1.00
0.21
1.82
Adi
nand
ra in
tege
rrim
a T.
And
ers.
ex
Dye
r3.
233.
230.
020.
611.
000.
211.
82U
nkno
wn
43.
233.
230.
020.
611.
000.
211.
82
Tota
l52
9.03
322.
5811
.14
100.
0010
0.00
100.
0030
0.00
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006 486
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.
Table 2. Sapling density.
Vernacular names Scientific names Density (tree/ha)
∫ÿππ“§ªÉ“ Mesua kunstleri 806.45‡ ¡Á¥·¥ß Syzygium zelanicum 362.90¬“ßæ“√“ Hevea brasiliensis 282.26¢«“¥ Syzygium lineatum 282.26≈“ßπ“ß Syzygium cerasiforme 282.26¡—ßµ“π Schima wallichii 282.26®‘°π¡ Barringtonia macrostachya 221.77æ≈Õ߇À¡◊Õ¥ Memecylon edule 201.61µ—ßÀπ Calophyllum calaba 181.45¢’ÈÀπÕπ Chaetocarpus castanocarpus 161.29‚∑– Rhodomyrtus tomentosum 141.13°–Õ«¡ Acronychia pedunculata 120.97‡¢Á¡∑Õß Ixora javanica 120.97π«≈ Garcinia merguensis 100.81æ≈—∫°≈⫬ Diospyros frutescens 80.65Tarenna sp. Tarenna sp. 80.65Memecylon sp. 1 80.65µ–‡§’¬πÀ‘π Hopea ferrea 80.65™–¡«ß Garcinia nigrolineata 60.48æ≈—∫æ≈“ Microcos tomentosa 60.48°â“π∑Õß Swingtonia schwenckii 60.48Unknown 1 Thymeliaceae 60.48°“≈π Elaeocarpus floribundus 60.48µ–‰À≈ Prismatomeris tetrandra 60.48¢àÕ¬Àπ“¡ Streblus ilicifolius 60.48æ‘°ÿ≈ªÉ“ Adinandra integerrima 60.48
Mallotus lowii 40.32¡–‰ø°“ Baccaurea parviflora 40.32°àÕ‡¢’Ȭ«À¡Ÿ Castanopsis schefferiana 40.32Leguminosae 40.32¢¡‘Èπµâπ Metadina trichotoma 40.32¡«°°Õ Olea salicifolia 40.32Ωîòπ·¥ß Cleistanthus sumatranus 20.16Diplospora sp 20.16¡Õ°¡—π Glocidion superbum 20.16°“·´– Callerya atropurpurea 20.16 â“π„À≠à Dillenia obovata 20.16°–Õ“¡ Crypteronia paniculatum 20.16°–ÕÕ° Artocarpus elasticus 20.16°–∑—ß„∫„À≠à Litsia grandis 20.16Unknown 2 20.16Unknown 3 20.16Unknown 6 20.16°√–¥Ÿ°§à“ß Aporosa aurea 20.16
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.487
Figure 2. Profile diagram and vertical stratification of trees in a 10*30 m plot.
Table 2. (Continued)
Vernacular names Scientific names Density (tree/ha)
À“¥√ÿ¡ Artocarpus dadah 20.16µ’ππ° Vitex pinnata 20.16°“·√âßÀ‘π Koilodepas longifolium 20.16¡–®È”°âÕß Ardisia colorata 20.16À«â“À‘π Syzygium claviflorum 20.16Ficus sp 20.16À“¥ Artocarpus lacucha 20.16πŸ¥µâπ Prunus grisea 20.16Tarenna sp. 20.16
total 5020.16
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006 488
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.
lineatum (DC.) Merr. & L.M. Perry, Syzygiumglaucum (King) P.Chantaranothai & J.Parn., Ixorajavanica DC. dominated. This microhabitat alsoseems to be more pristine than the others. On slightslopes and relatively flat areas, where moreorganic matter and sediment accumulated, Garciniaspp., Diospyros spp., Memecylon edule Roxb. andArtocarpus elasticus Reinw. ex Blume werecommon. This community covered most of thestudy area. In a small area of very shallow soilover rock outcrops (ca. 1 ha), a few plant speciessuch as Syzygium zeylanicum (L.) DC., Schimawallichii Choisy, Rhodomyrtus tomentosa (Aiton)Hassk., Calophyllum calaba L. and a parasiticplant, Dendrotrophe buxifolia (Blume) Miq.,sparsely covered the area, and canopy trees wererelatively low (< 8 m.).
Correlation of rubber tree density and commu-
nity characters of native plants.
Although the density of rubber trees in eachplot was not significantly correlated to the numberof sapling species (r = 0.02, p = 0.93), the densityof saplings (r = -0.16, p = 0.47), the number of treespecies (r = 0.03, p = 0.91) or the density of nativetrees (-0.24, p = 0.27) in plots, the basal area ofrubber trees was positively significantly correlatedto the number of native species (r = 0.57, p = 0.002,1 tailed), and partially negatively significantlyrelated to the density of native trees in each plot(r = -0.75, p<0.001, 1 tailed, controling for numberof all trees).
Discussion
In post-cultivation forest succession, floristiccomposition, structural characters and rate ofsuccession reflect land-use history, soil character-istics and proximity to old-growth forest (Tan-thana, 1988; Grau et al., 1997; DeWalt et al., 2003).Tanthana (1998) compared successional plantcommunities in different ages (up to 10 years-old)of abandoned rubber plantations at Ton Nga ChangWildlife Sanctuary, and revealed that native treedensity increases with time, although at a longertime scale (50 years) the opposite is true (Grau et
al., 1997). DeWalt et al. (2003) also pointed outthat the similarity between secondary forest and oldgrowth forest in tree species composition increaseswith forest age. Trees of Euphorbiaceae, Moraceae,Lauraceae, Sterculiaceae were dominant, andseedling, sapling and sprouting of Rubiaceaeand Euphorbiaceae were the most common inabandoned rubber plantations in a wildlife sanc-tuary which was 26 km from the study area. Thevariation in major families between the presentstudy and that of Tanthana (1998) may reflectecological variation especially proximity topropagule resources and soil conditions. In primaryforest of Ton Nga Chang Wildlife Sanctuary,Sawangchote (1998) studied ten 0.1 ha standsand found that trees of Dipterocarpaceae, Euphor-biaceae, Annonaceae, Sapindaceae were the mostdominant, respectively. Although soil at Ton NgaChang and Koh-Hong Hill are both in Ranong-Plato series, soil in the latter may be drier, as it ismuch shallower, with more weathered mudrockparticles and likely more drainage (S. Bumrungsri,pers. obs.). Dominance of Schima wallichii Choisy,Castanopsis schefferiana Hance, Syzygium spp.and Mesua kunstleri (King) Kosterm. which areoften found in dry habitats, suggests that Kho HongHill is drier. Syzygium spp. is also well dispersedin coastal sandbars communities in SongkhlaProvince which normally experience droughtconditions during the dry season (Sridith, 2002).Similarly, Maxwell (1986) also pointed out thatthis forest is drier, and postulated that this wascaused by continuous disturbance.
It is suggested that in a tropical moist climate,secondary succession proceeds rapidly with someecosystem characteristics such as leaf litter mass,soil nutrient processes differing little from valuesof old growth forest over 40-50 years (Grau et al.,1997; DeWalt et al., 2003). It would be interestingto compare between the structure of this 26-year-old secondary forest with that of patches of primaryforest that are present in military bases. DeWaltet al. (2003) found 21% similarity in foreststructure between 20 year-old secondary forestand old growth stands in moist neotropical foreston Barro Colorado Island. They also found that
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.489
it takes at least 70 years for secondary forest toresemble old growth stand structure. However, inthe less fertile soils of the Rio Negro Basin ofVenezuela, it was suggested to take up to 190 years(Saldarriaga et al., 1988).
Grau et al. (1997) suggested that pre-abandonment vegetation influences forest com-position for several decades. Specifically, forestrecovery in former rubber plantations differs fromother kinds of cultivation, as farmers normallyweed without burning in rubber plantations. Thus,when they were abandoned, rubber plantations stillhouse some plant propagules. Furthermore, severalstudies have indicated that tree plantations arean effective tool for catalyzing forest successionby overcoming barriers to natural regeneration(review by Parrotta, 2000). This is due to theirinfluence on understorey microclimate, develop-ment of litter, humus accumulation and structuralcomplexity of the vegetation. Apart from litterquantity, soil surface microclimate and shading inplantations is also responsible for biomass of thesoil fauna which plays a vital role in tropical forestas soil modifiers and nutrient cyclers. Thus, furtherinvestigation on how much litter fall and how fastthe decomposition rate there is in this 26-year-oldabandoned plantation is recommended.
Richards (1996) recognized four stages ofpost-cultivation succession; invasion, early seral,late seral, and mature. From his description, thepresent community could be assigned to the lateseral stage. In this stage, which is comparable withthe building phase of a primary forest gap, theforest becomes mixed with late seral species (long-lived and slow growing pioneers) and primaryforest species. Cryptononia paniculata (Blume),Vitex pinnata L., Acronychia pedunculata (L.)Miq., Artocarpus elasticus Rienw. Ex Blume areexamples of late seral species in this area, whereasspecies in the genera Memecylon, Diospyros,Syzygium, Garcinia, and Hopea are often foundin primary forest.
Correlation of rubber tree density and commu-
nity characters of native plants.
The negative correlation between rubber
tree biomass and native tree density may be due tothe fact that although abandoned rubber plantationcreate suitable environmental conditions for nativetree establishment, rubber trees are likely to becompetitors for light and soil water. Althoughrubber trees probably do not have allelopatric effecton nearby plants (Tanthana, 1998), this negativecorrelation suggests that, at a certain stage ofdevelopment, these exotic tropical trees whichperform well in the wet tropics can slow success-ion of native species probably by resource com-petition. A number of studies indicated negativeeffects of invasions of exotics on native commu-nities (review by Levine et al., 2003), and com-petition is by far the most common explanation.An empirical study on whether rubber trees havea negative impact on plant community structureand the underlying mechanisms of such impact isneeded. At present, rubber trees are well distributedin the study area (70% of plots), and they con-tributed 30-40% of density and basal area of treeswith a diameter larger than 10 cm. Furthermore,rubber saplings are among those which have thehighest density, although they accounted for only5.6 percent of total saplings. Alternatively, thepositive correlation between the basal area ofrubber trees and the species diversity of nativetree was significant. It is possible that in siteswhere the basal area of rubber trees is larger, theenvironmental conditions (e.g. microclimate, litterquantity, soil fertility) are also more suitable forthe establishment of a number of primary forestspecies as well.
Further studies and management recommend-
ation
Considering the proximity of the area to auniversity, this forest provides excellent opport-unities for ecological, educational and recreationalactivities. A GIS map of its boundary and thedifferent habitats on Kho Hong Hill based onupdated aerial photographs, together with envi-ronmental factors such as soil type and rock parentmaterial should be made. For botanical studies,the flora of Kho Hong Hill should be updated,since Maxwell (1986) carried out his intensive
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006 490
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.
survey of the flora twenty years ago. For furtherecological studies, a database and a field guidebased on morphological characters of each speciesare strongly recommended. This is an essentialfirst step and further studies on plant phenology,plant ecology, forest succession, and plant-animalinteraction could be undertaken. Permanent plotsshould be established in representative areas ofthis forest and intensive studies on forest success-ion should be carried out. These plots could bespecifically research areas for undergraduate andpostgraduate studies under the supervision ofacademic committees.
It is suggested that secondary forest canprovide vital resources for nesting, foraging andprotection for a number of animal taxa. DeWaltet al. (2003) indicated that understory fleshy fruitavailability was highest in young secondary forest(20 years old) compared to older secondary andold growth forest. Thus, secondary forest at thisage may provide good food resources for wildanimals especially generalist frugivore/insectivorebirds and mammals. Several species of fruigovorusbirds e.g. bulbul (Pycnonotus spp.) are common inforest habitats (Charoensap, 1996; S. Bumrungsri,pers. obs.). Several studies have indicated thatavian diversity in secondary forest is as high as itis in primary forest, although endemic species arefewer (Estrada et al., 1997; Waltert et al., 2004).As fauna is also important for forest recovery, aninvestigation of faunal diversity, population andhabitat use is needed, especially for those animalsthat are pollinators, seed dispersers, and de-composers. This forest patch is actually isolatedfrom nearby patches by current rubber plantationsand may suffer from small population effects.Conservation biology-based practices such asrestocking of plants and animals, natural corridorestablishment and monitoring could be imple-mented. In addition, environmental education andecotourism could be potentially applied in thisforest, especially for those school students fromHat Yai city. Forest nature trails with informationprovided could be constructed in different micro-habitats including a temporary waterfall (8 mhigh). However, without any regulations, these
activities could possibly upset the area and coulddisturb ecological studies. Zoning of this protectedarea to 1.) strict nature reserve (for research only)and 2.) conservation area (education and recreat-ion uses) is recommended. The particularly richflora along the main stream (Maxwell, 1986) isparticularly in need of protection.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank N. Noon-anan, S. In-tamusik, S. La-ma, P. Chaochiangtung and severalstudents of Department of Biology for their helpduring field work as part of the Tropical ForestEcology course. Kho Hong Meteorical Stationkindly provided climate information. Thanks arealso due to the Landscape and Building section ofPrince of Songkla University for providing mapsand information about site history, and to AssistantProfessor Dr. Kittichate Sridith, Professor PaulRacey and Dr. Prakart Sawangchote for theirdiscussion. Three anonymous reviewers improvedthe original manuscript.
References
Bryant D., Nielsen, D. and Tampley, L. 1997. The LastFrontier Forest: Ecosystems and Economics onthe Edge. World Resources Institute, Washington,D.C.
Charoensap, P. 1997. Species Diversity and HabitatDistribution of Birds in Prince of Songkla Uni-versity, Hat Yai Campus. BSc Thesis. Depart-ment of Biology, Prince of Songkla University.(in Thai)
Department of National Parks, Wildlife and PlantConservation. 2003. Forestry Statistical Data.http://www.dnp.go.th/stat/stat46/stat2546.htm(4/01/05).
DeWalt, S.J., Maliakal, S.K. and Denslow, J.S. 2003.Changes in vegetation structure and compositionalong a tropical forest chronosequence: implic-ations for wildlife. Forest Ecol. Manag., 182:139-151.
Estrada, A., Coates-Estrada, R. and Meritt, D. Jr. 1997.Anthropogenic landscape changes and aviandiversity at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biodivers.
Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol.
Vol.28 No.3 May - Jun. 2006
Plant community in abandoned rubber plantation
Bumrungsri, S., et al.491
Conserv., 6:19-43.Grau, H.R., Arturi, M.F., Brown, A.D. and Acenolaza,
P. G. 1997. Floristic and structural patterns alonga chronosequence of secondary forest successionin Argentinean subtropical montane forests.Forest Ecol. Manag., 95: 161-171.
Kho-Hong Meteorically Station. 2004. Climate recordsat Hat Yai. Unpublished report.
Levine, J.M., Vila, M., D'Antonio, C.M., Dukes, J.S.,Grigulis, K. and Lavorel, S. 2003. Mechanismsunderlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 270: 775-781.
Maxwell, J.F. 1986. The Flora of Kor-hong Hill,Hat Yai District, Songkhla Province, Thailand.Department of Biology, Prince of SongklaUniversity. Songkhla.
Parrotta, J.A. 2000. Catalysing natural forest restorationon degraded tropical landscapes. Pp. 45-56. inEilliott, S.J., Kerby, J., Blakesley, D., Hardwick,K., Woods, K. and Anusarnsunthorn, V. (eds.).Forest Restoration for Wldlife Conservation.International Tropical Timber Organisation andthe Forest restoration Research Unit, Chiang MaiUniversity, Thailand.
Prince of Songkla University. 2002. Master Plan forPlant Genetic Conservation Project under HerPrincess Siridhorn. Unpublished report. (in Thai)
Ratcharote, S. 1999. Survey of Mound Building Termitesat Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai Campus.BSc Thesis. Department of Biology, Prince ofSongkla University. (in Thai)
Richards, P.W. 1996. The Tropical Rain Forest: anEcological Study. Second Edition with contri-butions by R.P.D. Walsh, I.C. Baillie, and P.Greig- Smith. Cambridge University Press,Cambridge.
Royal Forest Department. 1993. 1993 Annual Report.Royal Forest Department. Bangkok.
Saldarriaga, J.G., West, D.C., Tharp, M.L. and Uhl, C.1988. Long-term chronosequence of forestsuccession in the upper Rio Negro of Columbiaand Venezuela. J. Ecol., 76: 938-958.
Sawangchote, P. 1998. Phytosociological Structure ofLower Tropical Rain Forest at Ton Nga ChangWildlife Sanctuary, Songkhla Province. M.Sc.Thesis, Prince of Songkla University. 171 pp.(in Thai)
Soil Survey Division. 1973. Detailed ReconnaissanceSoil Map of Songkhla Province. Department ofland development. Ministry of Agriculture andCooperation.
Sridith, K. 2002. The remnant of vegetation on thecoastal sandbar in Songkla Province, PeninsularThailand. Thai. For. Bull., 30: 49-58.
Sritangnan, Y. 1999. Plant Community Structures in anAbandoned Rubber Plantation, Rubber CuttingArea and Secondary Natural Forest. B.Sc. Thesis.Department of Biology, Prince of SongklaUniversity. (in Thai)
Tanthana, N. 1998. Natural Reforestation of AbandonedRubber Plantations. M.Sc. Thesis, Prince ofSongkla University. (in Thai)
Walsh, R.P.D. 1996. Climate. Pp. 159-205 in Richards,P.W. 1996. The Tropical Rain Forest: an Eco-logical Study. Second Edition with contributionsby R.P.D. Walsh, I.C. Baillie, and P. Greig-Smith. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Waltert, M., Mardiastuti, A. and Muhlenberg, M. 2004.Effect of land use on bird species richness inSulawesi, Indonesia. Conserv. Biol., 18: 1339-1346.
Watanasit, S., Noon-anant, N. and Binima, N. 2005.Preliminary survey of ants at a reserve area ofPrince of Songkla University. SongklanakarindJ. Sci. Technol., 27: 39-46.