Upload
alyson-hunter
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A Price Tag for Newborn and Child Survival
Dr. Joy Lawn BM BS MRCP (Paeds) MPHSaving Newborn Lives/Save the Children-USA
and MRC, Cape Town South Africa
and Institute of Child Health London
The Team
Child series costingNeff Walker
Jennifer BryceJoy Lawn
Zulfiqar BhuttaSaul MorrisBob Black
Newborn series costingNeff Walker
Joy LawnSimon CousinsZulfiqar BhuttaLuc de Bernis
Gary Darmstadt
Combining the newborn and child costingsAll the above plus Saul Morris and Gareth Jones
THE LANCET
Can the world afford to save
6 million
children?
Outline
1. Countdown context
2. Combining The Lancet Price Tags for newborn & child survival
3. Costs for lives saved – the bottom line
4. Comparison with other costings
5. Consequences
Countdown context
• The majority of newborn, child and maternal deaths are preventable with existing interventions
• Some countries or some single interventions have been successful in rapid scaling up, but overall we need to accelerate progress
$ Accelerated progress will require investment – how much will the essential interventions cost?
$ Donor investment in child health has increased but seems to be most focussed on “vertical” programmes
$ What is the financial gap? Where will the money come from for MNCH health systems and how will it get to where it is needed most in countries? How can the poor be protected?
Full coverage (99%) with 23 proven interventions could reduce under-five mortality by 66%,
saving 6 million child deaths/year
The Lancet Child Survival series: Key findingsL
IVE
S
Additional cost of providing these interventions is US$ 5.1 billion annually
or $1.23 per capitaCO
ST
Coverage (90%) with 16 proven interventions deliveredthrough packages could reduce neonatal mortality by up
to 67% equivalent to 2.7 million deaths/year
The Lancet Neonatal Survival series: Key findingsL
IVE
S
Additional cost of providing these interventions isUS$ 4.1 billion annually
or $0.96 per capita
70% of the costs also benefit mothers and older children
CO
ST
Methods & assumptionsCombining newborn and child survival costing
Bellagio series Neonatal series Countdown combined
Countries 42 75 60
Interventions 23
8 neonatal
16
7 of the 8 neonatal in Bellagio series
32
Current coverage
2000 2000 Updated with Countdown data
Target coverage
99% 90% 99%
To estimate the running costs at 99% coverage for selected essential interventions for newborn and child health in the 60 priority countries
• Current running costs based on current coverage (updated from Countdown report)
• Additional cost to provide these interventions to those currently unreached
Combined costing
Objective
Does NOT include costs toexpand infrastructure (new hospitals)
produce new human resources (pre-service training of new midwives)
Combined costing
Methods & assumptions
Current running costs
• Intervention-specific cost– Cost of commodities (ORS, antibiotics, vaccines)– Cost of service delivery (community health worker time, staff time and
clinic's running costs, theatre time)
• Programme cost associated – Staff and support inputs (training,
supervision, monitoring and evaluation etc)– Amortised costs for buildings, equipment and transport
• Incorporates the increasing costs required to reach the unreached at higher levels of coverage based on assumptions from the WHO CHOICE model
Approximate child age in months
Measles vaccine
Vitamin A
Complementary
Zinc
Hib vaccine
Insecticide-treated
Breastfeeding
Neonatal interventions*
replacement feeding
Tetanus Toxoid
preventive treatment
Pre
ven
tive
inte
rven
tio
ns
Beforebirth 2 4 9 21 27 33 39 45 51 576 15
Nevirapine &
Antimalarial intermittent
Birth
antenatal steroids
* Includes clean delivery with skilled attendant, temperature management, antibiotics for premature rupture of membranes and neonatal sepsis, steroids
Weeks1 - 2
Water & sanitation
feeding
materials
Contact with trained health care worker
Birth
Integrated service delivery timetable for preventive child survival interventions included (adaptation needed for countries)
Outreach/outpatient services
Tetanus toxoid immunizationIntermittent presumptive therapy for malaria
Family-community
Breastfeeding promotion,
Case management for pneumoniaClinical
care
Antibiotics for preterm rupture of membranes#
Corticosteroids for preterm labour#
Neonatal sepsis treatment
Clean delivery and neonatal resuscitation
Lancet Neonatal Survival seriesSkilled obstetric and immediate newborn care (hygiene, warmth, breastfeeding) & resuscitation
Emergency obstetric care to manage complications eg obstruction, hemorrhage
Emergency newborn care for illness, especially sepsis management and care of very low birth weight babies including Kangaroo Mother Care
Counseling and preparation for newborn care and breastfeeding, emergency preparedness
Healthy home care including breastfeeding promotion, hygienic cord/skin care, thermal care, promoting demand for quality care
Extra care of low birth weight babies
Case management for pneumonia
Clean delivery by traditional birth attendant (if no skilled attendant is available)
Simple early newborn care
InfancyNeonatal periodPre- pregnancy PregnancyBirth
# For health systems with higher coverage and capacity
Folic acid #
Focused 4-visit antenatal package• tetanus immunisation,• management of syphilis/STIspre-eclampsia, etc
Malaria intermittent presumptive therapy*
Detection and treatment of bacteriuria#
Postnatal care to support healthy practices
Early detection and referral of complications
Lives saved in the 60 countriesCombined costing results
Proportion of deaths averted at 99% coverage
Number of lives that could be saved in the 60
countries
All under 5 child deaths
67% 6.6 million
Two thirds of newborn and child deaths are preventable with existing interventions
6.6 million lives a year
Combined costing results
Cost in 60 countries
US$ 7 billion annually in new resources or US$ 1.62 per capita in the 60 countries
US$ 4.3 billion is already being spent
US$ 25 per child under 5 per year for the total cost all the essential interventions
Combined costing results
Cost in 60 countries
Sensitivity analysis was performed by varying the following inputs:
• Coverage estimates• Drug costs• Community worker costs
Results in a range of
US$ 4.6 to 10.7 billion
Combined costing results
Costs by service delivery approach
0
1
2
3
4
Water & sanitation Family & community Outreach/outpatients Clinical care
Co
sts
(U
S$
bill
ion
s)
pe
r y
ea
r
Costs for current coverageCosts for expanded coverage
Combined costing results
Costs saved in treatment by preventive care
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Without prevention effects With prevention effects
Bil
lion
s of
200
4 U
S$
Estimated annual running costs of delivering treatment interventions at current (2004) coverage levels, with and without savings from expanded prevention, in millions of 2004 US$
Savings: US$ 700 million
Combined costing results
Costs saved by integrated delivery
1,406
656
1,051
414
0
500
1,000
1,500
Hib Vaccine Exclusive Breastfeeding
Mil
lion
s of
200
4 U
S$
Integrated
Parallel
Estimated annual cost per child life saved comparing integrated and parallel delivery of preventive interventions in millions of 2004 US$
1. Cost-effective packages within the continuum of care
2. Delivery at all levels through outreach, family-community care, and facility-based clinical care – synergistic effect
3. Initial focus on outreach and health education to families and communities which is feasible even in weak health systems and gives economic benefits through prevention in reducing treatment costs
Economical policy choices
Comparison with other relevant costings
World Health Report 2005 reaching MDGs 4 & 5– Inputs:
• 75 countries with similar interventions– Results:
• $52 billion over 10 years• $7.8 billion per year once at coverage of 95%• Per capita cost of $1.50
Commission for Macroeconomics and Health– Inputs:
• Includes the cost of new infrastructure and human resources and running costs related to malaria, maternal and child health components of the total CMH costing
– Results: • $21.8 billion (14 to 25.5) out of total of $46 billion• Specific MNCH per capita costs of $4.5
Is US$ 7 billion/year to save 6.6 million
children and newborns “affordable”?
About half of the US$12 to US$20 billion committed
annually to the fight against HIV/AIDs
Less than 10% of what was spent on tobacco products in
the US in 2003
Less than 10% global Overseas Development Aid
estimated total of US$78 billion
Less than the annual subsidisation of
the Japanese cow
Only a little more than the US$4 billion lost to poor countries in migrating skilled professionals
Commitments…. few poor countries deliver
Low income countries must spend more and prioritise reaching the poor as per Abuja target of 15% of government spending on health
Tanzania Zambia Ethiopia
Commitments…. few donor countries deliver
Donor countries must meet their commitment of 0.7% of GDP
Not just more money – spending better and reaching the poor
Some low income countries halved their neonatal mortality rates in the 1990s
(Sri Lanka, Nicaragua, Honduras, Peru, Indonesia)
Success is possible in low-income countries
with leadership and systematic investment to
provide essential interventions to the poor
women and children
Source: Martines J et al Lancet 2005
Move to MNCH – incorporate costs for further maternal interventions
Approaches to identify the financing gap at country level and simplification of current tools
More long term efforts to improve the input data: Disability outcomes (eg by preventing birth asphyxia) not
included
Coverage data for specific interventions not routinely available
Almost no data on societal and opportunity costs
Costing – the future
ConclusionCommitment and leadership
• US $ 7 billion or $1.64 per capita per year would save 6.6 million babies and children and also reduce maternal deaths
• Current spending is not enough - limited information on resource flows suggests donor inputs for most MNCH essential interventions is a very low proportion
• More investment is required alongside strategic, phased planning - rapid gains can be made and many lives saved especially by starting at community level
• The leaders of both rich and poor countries have a responsibility to the mothers and children of the world
WH
O,
Riv
ers
of
life
Thank you!
Comparison with WHO cost estimates
Model element/
Approach
Lancet Child/ Neonatal
Survival Combined
WHO World Health Report
Relative to Bryce et al,
WHO estimate is likely to be:
What is costed? Running costs Scale-up & running costs
Countries 60 75
Interventions 32 16 “sets”
Target coverage 99% 95%
Delivery strategy Integrated delivery timetable
Some vertical; some
combined.