3
A note on natural correspondences that satisfy exclusion Author(s): Jack E. Graver Source: Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 29, No. 1 (July 2007), pp. 105-106 Published by: Springer Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41106847 . Accessed: 15/06/2014 04:39 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. . Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Choice and Welfare. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 185.2.32.60 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:39:01 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

A note on natural correspondences that satisfy exclusion

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A note on natural correspondences that satisfy exclusion

A note on natural correspondences that satisfy exclusionAuthor(s): Jack E. GraverSource: Social Choice and Welfare, Vol. 29, No. 1 (July 2007), pp. 105-106Published by: SpringerStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41106847 .

Accessed: 15/06/2014 04:39

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp

.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

.

Springer is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Choice and Welfare.

http://www.jstor.org

This content downloaded from 185.2.32.60 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:39:01 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 2: A note on natural correspondences that satisfy exclusion

Soc Choice Welfare (2007) 29:105-106 DOI 10.1007/S00355-006-0191-2

ORIGINAL PAPER

A note on natural correspondences that satisfy exclusion

Jack E. Graver

Received: 2 August 2004 / Accepted: 11 August 2006 / Published online: 13 September 2006 © Springer- Verlag 2006

Let A" be a finite set with m elements. A function F : Vi{X) -> V{X) (from the collection of all 2-element subsets of X into the collection of all subsets of X) is called a natural correspondence if 5 ç F(5), for all S e ViiX). We say that F satisfies exclusion if there exists some 3-element subset {x,y, z] such that x i F({y,z}),y i F({x,z}) and z ¿ F({x9y}). Observation 1 F does not satisfy exclusion if and only if, for every T e Vi(X), there exists some S e Vi(X) such that SçTç F (S).

Let F : ViiX) -> V{X) be a natural correspondence; we define the average image size ap by:

^2/ SeV2{X) Theorem 1 Let F : Vi(X) -+ V{X) be a natural correspondence that does not satisfy exclusion. Then a? > m^-. Proof Since F does not satisfy exclusion, we may assign to each T e V?,(X) a subset S e Vi(X) such that S ç T ç F(S). Now consider a subset S e Vi{X) and let Ti, . . . , Tfc be the 3-element subsets to which S has been assigned. Then 'F(S)' > k + 2. Summing this inequality over all 2-element subsets gives:

SeV2(X) V<V VZ/

Dividing through by (^) and simplifying gives the result. a

J. E. Graver (El) Department of Mathematics, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY 13244-1150, USA e-mail: [email protected]

Ô Springer

This content downloaded from 185.2.32.60 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:39:01 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions

Page 3: A note on natural correspondences that satisfy exclusion

106 J. E. Graver

Corollary llfF: Vi{X) -» V(X) is a natural correspondence with ap < ^, then F satisfies exclusion.

This result is best possible in that, for any ra, one may construct a natural correspondence F : V2(X) -> V(X) that does not satisfy exclusion for which aF = ^. First, to each T e V3(X), assign a subset S e Vi{X) such that S ç T. Now, for each subset 5 e Vi(X), let 7i, . . . , Tk be the collection of 3-element subsets to which S has been assigned and define F(S) = T' U • • • U 7¿ U 5. We close with a simple example.

Example 1 Let X = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8}. We will denote our subsets by their characteristic functions: 11010000 denotes {1,2,4}; in fact since our example will be symmetric under cyclic permutations, 11010000 will denote the sets {1,2, 4}, {2, 3, 5},..., {8, 1,3}.

Up to a cyclic permutation, there are only 4 types of 2-element subsets: a, 11000000; ß, 10100000; y, 10010000; 8, 10001000 and 7 types of 3-element sub- sets: a, 11100000; fc, 11010000; c, 11001000; rf, 11000100; e, 11000010;/, 10101000; g, 10100100. To each 3-subset of type a or b assign the 2-subset of type ß that it contains; to each 3-subset of type c or g assign the 2-subset of type y that it contains; to each 3-subset of type d or e assign the 2-subset of type a that it contains; finally to each 3-subset of type / assign the 2-subset of type 8 that it contains. Then

F(llOOOOOO) = 11000110, F(IOIOOOOO) = 11100001, F(IOOIOOOO) = 10010011, F(IOOOIOOO) = 10101010,

andflF = 4=^.

Reference

CK Campbell DE, Kelly JS (2004) Social welfare functions that satisfy Pareto, anonymity and neutrality, but not IIA

Ö Springer

This content downloaded from 185.2.32.60 on Sun, 15 Jun 2014 04:39:01 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions