Upload
charlotte-cole
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A new theoretical insight intoA new theoretical insight intothe spectroscopic propertiesthe spectroscopic propertiesof polonium and astatine atomsof polonium and astatine atoms
Pascal Quinet
Spectroscopie Atomique et Physique des Atomes Froids, Université de Liège
&
Astrophysique et Spectroscopie, Université de Mons
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Plan of the talk
Some properties of polonium and astatine atoms
Experimental spectrum and energy levels of polonium
Experimental spectrum and energy levels of astatine
Theoretical approach
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Atomic structure calculations in astatine
Summary and conclusions
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Some properties of polonium and astatine atoms
Polonium (Po)
Astatine (At)
Atomic number : 84Ground electronic configuration : [Xe]4f145d106s26p4
Excited electronic configurations : [Xe]4f145d106s26p3nl(nl = 6d, 7s, 7p, 7d, …)
Known isotopes : 42 (A = 186 – 227)Longest half-life : 103 years (209Po)
Atomic number : 85Ground electronic configuration : [Xe]4f145d106s26p5
Excited electronic configurations : [Xe]4f145d106s26p4nl(nl = 6d, 7s, 7p, 7d, …)
Known isotopes : 32 (A = 191, 193 – 223)Longest half-life : 8.1 hours (210At)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Experimental spectrum and energy levels of polonium
Config. Term J E (cm-1) Config. Term J E (cm-1)6p4 3P 2 0.00 [odd] ? ° ? 1 544716p4 3P 0 7514.69 6p3(4S)8s 5S° ? 2 55465.366p4 3P 1 16831.61 [odd] ? ° ? 2 ? 559236p4 1D 2 21679.11 6p3(4S)8s 2S° ? 1 ? 56268.346p3(4S)7s 5S° 2 39081.19 6p3(2D)7S 3D° ? 1 ? 57078.056p3(4S)7s 3S° 1 40802.70 6p3(4S)8p 5P ? 3 59290.616p4 1S 0 42718 6p3(4S)8p ? 1 or 2 59354.476p3(4S)7p 5P ? 3 ? 50681.28 6p3(4S)7d ° ? 2 ? 59469.666p3(4S)7p ? ? 50934.89 6p3(4S)8p ? 1 or 2 59583.066p3(4S)7p ? 1 or 2 51636.42 [odd] ? ° ? 1 or 2 618186p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 2 51713.09 6p3(4S)9p 5P ? 3 ? 62680.996p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 3 52098.93 6p3(4S)9p ? 1 or 2 62703.966p3(4S)6d ° ? 1 52532.12 6p3(4S)9p ? ? 1 or 2 628066p3(4S)6d ° ? 2 53027.61 6p3(4S)8d ° ? 1 or 2 62885.19[odd] ? ° ? 1 53762 6p3(4S)8d ° ? 1 or 2 62959.49[odd] ? ° ? 1 54250.26 6p3(4S)10p ? ? 1 or 2 64451
G.W. Charles, J.O.S.A. 56, 1292 (1966) 97 spectral lines in the region 213.9 – 861.9 nm[NIST Atomic Spectra Database (http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm)]
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Experimental spectrum and energy levels of polonium
Config. Term J E (cm-1) Config. Term J E (cm-1)6p4 3P 2 0.00 [odd] ? ° ? 1 544716p4 3P 0 7514.69 6p3(4S)8s 5S° ? 2 55465.366p4 3P 1 16831.61 [odd] ? ° ? 2 ? 559236p4 1D 2 21679.11 6p3(4S)8s 2S° ? 1 ? 56268.346p3(4S)7s 5S° 2 39081.19 6p3(2D)7S 3D° ? 1 ? 57078.056p3(4S)7s 3S° 1 40802.70 6p3(4S)8p 5P ? 3 59290.616p4 1S 0 42718 6p3(4S)8p ? 1 or 2 59354.476p3(4S)7p 5P ? 3 ? 50681.28 6p3(4S)7d ° ? 2 ? 59469.666p3(4S)7p ? ? 50934.89 6p3(4S)8p ? 1 or 2 59583.066p3(4S)7p ? 1 or 2 51636.42 [odd] ? ° ? 1 or 2 618186p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 2 51713.09 6p3(4S)9p 5P ? 3 ? 62680.996p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 3 52098.93 6p3(4S)9p ? 1 or 2 62703.966p3(4S)6d ° ? 1 52532.12 6p3(4S)9p ? ? 1 or 2 628066p3(4S)6d ° ? 2 53027.61 6p3(4S)8d ° ? 1 or 2 62885.19[odd] ? ° ? 1 53762 6p3(4S)8d ° ? 1 or 2 62959.49[odd] ? ° ? 1 54250.26 6p3(4S)10p ? ? 1 or 2 64451
G.W. Charles, J.O.S.A. 56, 1292 (1966) 97 spectral lines in the region 213.9 – 861.9 nm[NIST Atomic Spectra Database (http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm)]
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Experimental spectrum and energy levels of polonium
Config. Term J E (cm-1) Config. Term J E (cm-1)6p4 3P 2 0.00 [odd] ? ° ? 1 544716p4 3P 0 7514.69 6p3(4S)8s 5S° ? 2 55465.366p4 3P 1 16831.61 [odd] ? ° ? 2 ? 559236p4 1D 2 21679.11 6p3(4S)8s 2S° ? 1 ? 56268.346p3(4S)7s 5S° 2 39081.19 6p3(2D)7S 3D° ? 1 ? 57078.056p3(4S)7s 3S° 1 40802.70 6p3(4S)8p 5P ? 3 59290.616p4 1S 0 42718 6p3(4S)8p ? 1 or 2 59354.476p3(4S)7p 5P ? 3 ? 50681.28 6p3(4S)7d ° ? 2 ? 59469.666p3(4S)7p ? ? 50934.89 6p3(4S)8p ? 1 or 2 59583.066p3(4S)7p ? 1 or 2 51636.42 [odd] ? ° ? 1 or 2 618186p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 2 51713.09 6p3(4S)9p 5P ? 3 ? 62680.996p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 3 52098.93 6p3(4S)9p ? 1 or 2 62703.966p3(4S)6d ° ? 1 52532.12 6p3(4S)9p ? ? 1 or 2 628066p3(4S)6d ° ? 2 53027.61 6p3(4S)8d ° ? 1 or 2 62885.19[odd] ? ° ? 1 53762 6p3(4S)8d ° ? 1 or 2 62959.49[odd] ? ° ? 1 54250.26 6p3(4S)10p ? ? 1 or 2 64451
G.W. Charles, J.O.S.A. 56, 1292 (1966) 97 spectral lines in the region 213.9 – 861.9 nm[NIST Atomic Spectra Database (http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm)]
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Experimental spectrum and energy levels of astatine
Config. Term J E (cm-1)6p5 2P° 3/2 0.06p4(3P)7s 4P 5/2 44549.36p4(3P)7s 4P 3/2 46233.6
R. McLaughlin, J.O.S.A. 54, 965 (1964) 2 spectral lines at 216.225 and 224.401 nm[NIST Atomic Spectra Database (http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/asd.cfm)]
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Based on the Schrödinger equation (atom with N electrons)
EH with
ij ijii
N
i r
e
r
Ze
mH
0
2
0
22
2
1 442
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Based on the Schrödinger equation (atom with N electrons)
EH with
ij ijii
N
i r
e
r
Ze
mH
0
2
0
22
2
1 442
Central field approximation One-electron wavefunctions
)(),()(1
)( ,2/1 σqslsl mlmnlmnlm YrP
r
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Based on the Schrödinger equation (atom with N electrons)
EH with
ij ijii
N
i r
e
r
Ze
mH
0
2
0
22
2
1 442
Central field approximation One-electron wavefunctions
)(),()(1
)( ,2/1 σqslsl mlmnlmnlm YrP
r
Atomic wavefunctions (Slater determinant)
)(...)()(
............
)(...)()(
)(...)()(
!
1),...,,(
21
22221
11211
21
NNNN
N
N
NN
qqq
qqq
qqq
qqq
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Hartree-Fock equations
)()(4)()(
)(4
)()(42
)1(
2
0
2*
0
22
0
2
2
2
2
22
iiiijjij
jijjmmij
iijij
jjij
iiii
ii
i
rPErPdr
erPrP
rPdr
erPrP
r
Ze
mr
ll
dr
d
m
jsis
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Hartree-Fock equations
Resolution of Hartree-Fock equations (self-consistent field)
)()(4)()(
)(4
)()(42
)1(
2
0
2*
0
22
0
2
2
2
2
22
iiiijjij
jijjmmij
iijij
jjij
iiii
ii
i
rPErPdr
erPrP
rPdr
erPrP
r
Ze
mr
ll
dr
d
m
jsis
Starting Pi(ri) Calculate potentials Solve HF equations New Pi(ri)
Same as before ?
STOP
NOYES
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Multiconfiguration approach (Slater-Condon)
bkb
b
k a
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Multiconfiguration approach (Slater-Condon)
Relativistic effects
bkb
b
k a
Included perturbationaly (spin-orbit, mass-velocity, Darwin term)
Good agreement with fully relativistic methods
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Multiconfiguration approach (Slater-Condon)
Relativistic effects
Ab initio or semi-empirical approach
bkb
b
k a
Included perturbationaly (spin-orbit, mass-velocity, Darwin term)
Good agreement with fully relativistic methods
Experimental energy levels can be used to optimize the radial parameters(configuration average energies, electrostatic interaction integrals, spin-orbit parameters)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Multiconfiguration approach (Slater-Condon)
Example : Po (6p4 – 6p36d transitions)
bkb
b
k a
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Multiconfiguration approach (Slater-Condon)
Example : Po (6p4 – 6p36d transitions)
bkb
b
k a
Intravalence correlation(single excitations up to n=6, l=3)
Even parity4f145d106s26p4
4f145d106s26p35f4f145d106s26p36f4f145d106s26p26d2
Odd parity4f145d106s26p36d4f145d106s26p26d5f4f145d106s26p26d6f
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Multiconfiguration approach (Slater-Condon)
Example : Po (6p4 – 6p36d transitions)
bkb
b
k a
Intravalence correlation(single excitations up to n=6, l=3)
Even parity4f145d106s26p4
4f145d106s26p35f4f145d106s26p36f4f145d106s26p26d2
Odd parity4f145d106s26p36d4f145d106s26p26d5f4f145d106s26p26d6f
Core-valence correlation (single excitations from 4f, 5d, 6s)
Even parity4f145d106s6p46d4f145d106s6p36d5f4f145d106s6p36d6f4f145d96s26p46d4f145d96s26p36d5f4f145d96s26p36d6f4f135d106s26p5
4f135d106s26p45f4f135d106s26p46f4f135d106s26p36d2
Odd parity4f145d106s6p5
4f145d106s6p45f4f145d106s6p46f4f145d106s6p36d2
4f145d96s26p5
4f145d96s26p45f4f145d96s26p46f4f145d96s26p36d2
4f135d106s26p46d4f135d106s26p36d5f4f135d106s26p36d6f
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Multiconfiguration approach (Slater-Condon)
Example : Po (6p4 – 6p36d transitions)
bkb
b
k a
Intravalence correlation(single excitations up to n=6, l=3)
Even parity4f145d106s26p4
4f145d106s26p35f4f145d106s26p36f4f145d106s26p26d2
Odd parity4f145d106s26p36d4f145d106s26p26d5f4f145d106s26p26d6f
Core-valence correlation (single excitations from 4f, 5d, 6s)
Even parity4f145d106s6p46d4f145d106s6p36d5f4f145d106s6p36d6f4f145d96s26p46d4f145d96s26p36d5f4f145d96s26p36d6f4f135d106s26p5
4f135d106s26p45f4f135d106s26p46f4f135d106s26p36d2
Odd parity4f145d106s6p5
4f145d106s6p45f4f145d106s6p46f4f145d106s6p36d2
4f145d96s26p5
4f145d96s26p45f4f145d96s26p46f4f145d96s26p36d2
4f135d106s26p46d4f135d106s26p36d5f4f135d106s26p36d6f
196 states
594 states
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachPseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock (HFR) method(R.D. Cowan, The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra, Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 1981)
Multiconfiguration approach (Slater-Condon)
Example : Po (6p4 – 6p36d transitions)
bkb
b
k a
Intravalence correlation(single excitations up to n=6, l=3)
Even parity4f145d106s26p4
4f145d106s26p35f4f145d106s26p36f4f145d106s26p26d2
Odd parity4f145d106s26p36d4f145d106s26p26d5f4f145d106s26p26d6f
Core-valence correlation (single excitations from 4f, 5d, 6s)
Even parity4f145d106s6p46d4f145d106s6p36d5f4f145d106s6p36d6f4f145d96s26p46d4f145d96s26p36d5f4f145d96s26p36d6f4f135d106s26p5
4f135d106s26p45f4f135d106s26p46f4f135d106s26p36d2
Odd parity4f145d106s6p5
4f145d106s6p45f4f145d106s6p46f4f145d106s6p36d2
4f145d96s26p5
4f145d96s26p45f4f145d96s26p46f4f145d96s26p36d2
4f135d106s26p46d4f135d106s26p36d5f4f135d106s26p36d6f
10596 states
10910 states
196 states
594 states
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachCore-polarization corrections (HFR+CPOL method)(see e.g. Quinet et al., M.N.R.A.S. 307, 934, 1999; Quinet et al., J. Alloys Compd 344, 255, 2002)
Core-polarization model potential
Intravalence correlation considered within a configuration interaction expansion
Core-valence correlation represented by a core-polarization model potential depending on two parameters (dipole polarizability d and cut-off radius rc)
n
i ci
idP rr
rV
1322
2
1 )(2
1
ji cjci
jidP rrrr
rrV
2/322222 )])([(
.
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Theoretical approachCore-polarization corrections (HFR+CPOL method)(see e.g. Quinet et al., M.N.R.A.S. 307, 934, 1999; Quinet et al., J. Alloys Compd 344, 255, 2002)
Core-polarization model potential
Corrected dipole radial integral
Intravalence correlation considered within a configuration interaction expansion
Core-valence correlation represented by a core-polarization model potential depending on two parameters (dipole polarizability d and cut-off radius rc)
n
i ci
idP rr
rV
1322
2
1 )(2
1
ji cjci
jidP rrrr
rrV
2/322222 )])([(
.
0
'' )()( drrPrrP lnnl replaced by
0
''2/322)(
)(1)( drrP
rrrrP ln
c
dnl
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in poloniumJournal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 145 (2014) 153 - 159
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Model A : 6s26p4 + 6s26p3nl (nl = 7s, 7p, 6d, 7d, 5f, 6f)
Model B : Model A + 6s26p2nln’l’
Model C : Model B + 6s26pnln’l’n’’l’’
Model D : Model C + 6s6p4nl + 6s6p3nln’l’
Model E : Model D + 6p6 + 6p5nl + 6p4nln’l’
Model F : Model E + [1s2 … 5d10] core-polarization (Po6+ core : d = 2.00 a.u., rc = 1.17 a.u.)
Pseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock models considered in the present work
Intravalence interactionswithin 6p3nl
Single excitations from 6p
Double excitations from 6p
Single excitations from 6s
Double excitations from 6s
Core-polarization up to 5d
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Model A : 6s26p4 + 6s26p3nl (nl = 7s, 7p, 6d, 7d, 5f, 6f)
Model B : Model A + 6s26p2nln’l’
Model C : Model B + 6s26pnln’l’n’’l’’
Model D : Model C + 6s6p4nl + 6s6p3nln’l’
Model E : Model D + 6p6 + 6p5nl + 6p4nln’l’
Model F : Model E + [1s2 … 5d10] core-polarization (Po6+ core : d = 2.00 a.u., rc = 1.17 a.u.)
Pseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock models considered in the present work
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Model A : 6s26p4 + 6s26p3nl (nl = 7s, 7p, 6d, 7d, 5f, 6f)
Model B : Model A + 6s26p2nln’l’
Model C : Model B + 6s26pnln’l’n’’l’’
Model D : Model C + 6s6p4nl + 6s6p3nln’l’
Model E : Model D + 6p6 + 6p5nl + 6p4nln’l’
Model F : Model E + [1s2 … 5d10] core-polarization (Po6+ core : d = 2.00 a.u., rc = 1.17 a.u.)
Pseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock models considered in the present work
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Experiment (NIST) Theory (This work)
Config. Term J E (cm-1) E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
6p4 3P 2 0.00 0 2 78% 6p4 3P 20% 6p4 1D
6p4 3P 0 7514.69 7516 0 55% 6p4 3P 43% 6p4 1S
6p4 3P 1 16831.61 16833 1 98% 6p4 3P
6p4 1D 2 21679.11 21680 2 78% 6p4 1D 20% 6p4 3P
6p4 1S 0 42718 42717 0 54% 6p4 1S 43% 6p4 3P
6p3(4S)7p 5P ? 3 ? 50681.28 50773 1 34% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 16% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 15% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
6p3(4S)7p ? ? 50934.89 50838 2 40% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 15% 6p3(2P)7p 3D 13% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
6p3(4S)7p ? 1 or 2 51636.42 51641 3 52% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 31% 6p3(2P)7p 3D 8% 6p3(2D)7p 3F
51896 1 31% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 19% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 16% 6p3(2P)7p 3S
52853 2 38% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 17% 6p3(2P)7p 1D 13% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
53847 0 55% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 19% 6p3(2P)7p 1S 12% 6p3(2D)7p 3P
Even-parity energy levels
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Experiment (NIST) Theory (This work)
Config. Term J E (cm-1) E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
6p4 3P 2 0.00 0 2 78% 6p4 3P 20% 6p4 1D
6p4 3P 0 7514.69 7516 0 55% 6p4 3P 43% 6p4 1S
6p4 3P 1 16831.61 16833 1 98% 6p4 3P
6p4 1D 2 21679.11 21680 2 78% 6p4 1D 20% 6p4 3P
6p4 1S 0 42718 42717 0 54% 6p4 1S 43% 6p4 3P
6p3(4S)7p 5P ? 3 ? 50681.28 50773 1 34% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 16% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 15% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
6p3(4S)7p ? ? 50934.89 50838 2 40% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 15% 6p3(2P)7p 3D 13% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
6p3(4S)7p ? 1 or 2 51636.42 51641 3 52% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 31% 6p3(2P)7p 3D 8% 6p3(2D)7p 3F
51896 1 31% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 19% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 16% 6p3(2P)7p 3S
52853 2 38% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 17% 6p3(2P)7p 1D 13% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
53847 0 55% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 19% 6p3(2P)7p 1S 12% 6p3(2D)7p 3P
Even-parity energy levels
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Experiment (NIST) Theory (This work)
Config. Term J E (cm-1) E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
6p4 3P 2 0.00 0 2 78% 6p4 3P 20% 6p4 1D
6p4 3P 0 7514.69 7516 0 55% 6p4 3P 43% 6p4 1S
6p4 3P 1 16831.61 16833 1 98% 6p4 3P
6p4 1D 2 21679.11 21680 2 78% 6p4 1D 20% 6p4 3P
6p4 1S 0 42718 42717 0 54% 6p4 1S 43% 6p4 3P
6p3(4S)7p 5P ? 3 ? 50681.28 50773 1 34% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 16% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 15% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
6p3(4S)7p ? ? 50934.89 50838 2 40% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 15% 6p3(2P)7p 3D 13% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
6p3(4S)7p ? 1 or 2 51636.42 51641 3 52% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 31% 6p3(2P)7p 3D 8% 6p3(2D)7p 3F
51896 1 31% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 19% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 16% 6p3(2P)7p 3S
52853 2 38% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 17% 6p3(2P)7p 1D 13% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
53847 0 55% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 19% 6p3(2P)7p 1S 12% 6p3(2D)7p 3P
Even-parity energy levels
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Experiment (NIST) Theory (This work)
Config. Term J E (cm-1) E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
6p4 3P 2 0.00 0 2 78% 6p4 3P 20% 6p4 1D
6p4 3P 0 7514.69 7516 0 55% 6p4 3P 43% 6p4 1S
6p4 3P 1 16831.61 16833 1 98% 6p4 3P
6p4 1D 2 21679.11 21680 2 78% 6p4 1D 20% 6p4 3P
6p4 1S 0 42718 42717 0 54% 6p4 1S 43% 6p4 3P
6p3(4S)7p 5P ? 3 ? 50681.28 50773 1 34% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 16% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 15% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
6p3(4S)7p ? ? 50934.89 50838 2 40% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 15% 6p3(2P)7p 3D 13% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
6p3(4S)7p ? 1 or 2 51636.42 51641 3 52% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 31% 6p3(2P)7p 3D 8% 6p3(2D)7p 3F
51896 1 31% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 19% 6p3(4S)7p 5P 16% 6p3(2P)7p 3S
52853 2 38% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 17% 6p3(2P)7p 1D 13% 6p3(2P)7p 3P
53847 0 55% 6p3(4S)7p 3P 19% 6p3(2P)7p 1S 12% 6p3(2D)7p 3P
Even-parity energy levels
Se 4p3(4S)5p 5P J = 1 59242.80 Te 5p3(4S)6p 5P J = 1 54160.09[Experimental data] J = 2 59287.82 [Experimental data] J = 2 54199.12
J = 3 59391.31 J = 3 54535.35
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Experiment (NIST) Theory (This work)
Config. Term J E (cm-1) E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
6p3(4S)7s 5S° 2 39081.19 38837 2 52% 6p3(4S)7s 5S 32% 6p3(2P)7s 3P 9% 6p3(2D)7s 3D
6p3(4S)7s 3S° 1 40802.70 40551 1 43% 6p3(4S)7s 3S 22% 6p3(2P)7s 1P 20% 6p3(2D)7s 3D
6p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 2 51713.09 51846 2 28% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 18% 6p3(4S)6d 3D 15% 6p3(2P)6d 3D
6p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 3 52098.93 52213 3 47% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 17% 6p3(2P)6d 3D 14% 6p3(2P)6d 3F
6p3(4S)6d ° ? 1 52532.12 52375 1 44% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 17% 6p3(2P)6d 3P 12% 6p3(2P)6d 3D
52835 4 53% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 31% 6p3(2P)6d 3F 8% 6p3(2D)6d 3G
6p3(4S)6d ° ? 2 53027.61 52863 2 26% 6p3(4S)6d 3D 21% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 6% 6p3(2D)6d 3P
52904 0 54% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 30% 6p3(2P)6d 3P 7% 6p3(2D)6d 3P
54000 3 46% 6p3(4S)6d 3D 20% 6p3(2P)6d 1F 11% 6p3(2D)6d 3G
[odd] ? ° ? 1 54250.26 54316 1 44% 6p3(4S)6d 3D 16% 6p3(2P)6d 1P 10% 6p3(2P)6d 3P
[odd] ? ° ? 2 ? 55923.80 56107 2 37% 6p3(2D)7s 3D 36% 6p3(4S)7s 5S 16% 6p3(2D)7s 1D
6p3(2D)7S 3D° ? 1 ? 57078.05 57321 1 46% 6p3(2D)7s 3D 36% 6p3(4S)7s 3S 3% 6p3(4S)7d 3D
6p3(4S)7d ° ? 2 ? 59469.66 59456 2 30% 6p3(4S)7d 5D 20% 6p3(4S)7d 3D 14% 6p3(2P)7d 3D
Odd-parity energy levels
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Experiment (NIST) Theory (This work)
Config. Term J E (cm-1) E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
6p3(4S)7s 5S° 2 39081.19 38837 2 52% 6p3(4S)7s 5S 32% 6p3(2P)7s 3P 9% 6p3(2D)7s 3D
6p3(4S)7s 3S° 1 40802.70 40551 1 43% 6p3(4S)7s 3S 22% 6p3(2P)7s 1P 20% 6p3(2D)7s 3D
6p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 2 51713.09 51846 2 28% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 18% 6p3(4S)6d 3D 15% 6p3(2P)6d 3D
6p3(4S)6d 5D° ? 3 52098.93 52213 3 47% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 17% 6p3(2P)6d 3D 14% 6p3(2P)6d 3F
6p3(4S)6d ° ? 1 52532.12 52375 1 44% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 17% 6p3(2P)6d 3P 12% 6p3(2P)6d 3D
52835 4 53% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 31% 6p3(2P)6d 3F 8% 6p3(2D)6d 3G
6p3(4S)6d ° ? 2 53027.61 52863 2 26% 6p3(4S)6d 3D 21% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 6% 6p3(2D)6d 3P
52904 0 54% 6p3(4S)6d 5D 30% 6p3(2P)6d 3P 7% 6p3(2D)6d 3P
54000 3 46% 6p3(4S)6d 3D 20% 6p3(2P)6d 1F 11% 6p3(2D)6d 3G
[odd] ? ° ? 1 54250.26 54316 1 44% 6p3(4S)6d 3D 16% 6p3(2P)6d 1P 10% 6p3(2P)6d 3P
[odd] ? ° ? 2 ? 55923.80 56107 2 37% 6p3(2D)7s 3D 36% 6p3(4S)7s 5S 16% 6p3(2D)7s 1D
6p3(2D)7S 3D° ? 1 ? 57078.05 57321 1 46% 6p3(2D)7s 3D 36% 6p3(4S)7s 3S 3% 6p3(4S)7d 3D
6p3(4S)7d ° ? 2 ? 59469.66 59456 2 30% 6p3(4S)7d 5D 20% 6p3(4S)7d 3D 14% 6p3(2P)7d 3D
Odd-parity energy levels
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Radiative transitions (transition probabilities and oscillator strengths)
2)1(
36
2)1(
320
44
12
)(100261.2
12
)(
3
64
kkiik
ki
kkiik
kiki
JPJJ
E
JPJJ
E
h
aeA
E
kii
kik A
J
Jf
15
2
106702.612
12
fik
with Aki in s-1, Eki in cm-1, in Å
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Model A : 6s26p4 + 6s26p3nl (nl = 7s, 7p, 6d, 7d, 5f, 6f)
Model B : Model A + 6s26p2nln’l’
Model C : Model B + 6s26pnln’l’n’’l’’
Model D : Model C + 6s6p4nl + 6s6p3nln’l’
Model E : Model D + 6p6 + 6p5nl + 6p4nln’l’
Model F : Model E + [1s2 … 5d10] core-polarization (Po6+ core : d = 2.00 a.u., rc = 1.17 a.u.)
Radiative transitions (transition probabilities and oscillator strengths)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Radiative transitions
Model A : 6s26p4 + 6s26p3nl (nl = 7s, 7p, 6d, 7d, 5f, 6f)
Model B : Model A + 6s26p2nln’l’
Model C : Model B + 6s26pnln’l’n’’l’’
Model D : Model C + 6s6p4nl + 6s6p3nln’l’
Model E : Model D + 6p6 + 6p5nl + 6p4nln’l’
Model F : Model E + [1s2 … 5d10] core-polarization (Po6+ core : d = 2.00 a.u., rc = 1.17 a.u.)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in poloniumRadiative transitions (oscillator strengths and transition probabilities)
(nm)a Lower level (cm-1)b Upper level (cm-1)b log gf gA (s-1)175.199 0.00 J=2 (even) 57078.05 J=1 (odd) -0.85 3.11E+8178.815 0.00 J=2 (even) 55923.80 J=2 (odd) -0.36 9.26E+8184.331 0.00 J=2 (even) 54250.26 J=1 (odd) -0.81 3.05E+8188.581 0.00 J=2 (even) 53027.61 J=2 (odd) -0.15 1.33E+9190.360 0.00 J=2 (even) 52532.12 J=1 (odd) -1.98 1.90E+7191.943 0.00 J=2 (even) 52098.93 J=3 (odd) -0.61 4.44E+8201.697 7514.69 J=0 (even) 57078.05 J=1 (odd) -1.19 1.08E+8213.902 7514.69 J=0 (even) 54250.26 J=1 (odd) -0.26 8.05E+8222.067 7514.69 J=0 (even) 52532.12 J=1 (odd) -1.26 7.43E+7234.461 16831.61 J=1 (even) 59469.66 J=2 (odd) -1.87 1.64E+7245.008 0.00 J=2 (even) 40802.70 J=1 (odd) -0.09 8.96E+8248.394 16831.61 J=1 (even) 57078.05 J=1 (odd) -0.21 6.72E+8255.729 16831.61 J=1 (even) 55923.80 J=2 (odd) -1.14 7.46E+7255.801 0.00 J=2 (even) 39081.19 J=2 (odd) -0.42 3.84E+8264.538 21679.11 J=2 (even) 59469.66 J=2 (odd) -1.54 2.74E+7276.192 16831.61 J=1 (even) 53027.61 J=2 (odd) -1.21 5.38E+7280.026 16831.61 J=1 (even) 52532.12 J=1 (odd) -1.96 9.21E+6282.411 21679.11 J=2 (even) 57078.05 J=1 (odd) -1.11 6.60E+7286.601 16831.61 J=1 (even) 51713.09 J=2 (odd) -1.80 1.29E+7291.931 21679.11 J=2 (even) 55923.80 J=2 (odd) -1.14 5.79E+7300.321 7514.69 J=0 (even) 40802.70 J=1 (odd) -0.80 1.16E+8306.931 21679.11 J=2 (even) 54250.26 J=1 (odd) -2.36 3.13E+6324.024 21679.11 J=2 (even) 52532.12 J=1 (odd) -1.85 8.79E+6328.638 21679.11 J=2 (even) 52098.93 J=3 (odd) -2.14 4.52E+6417.052 16831.61 J=1 (even) 40802.70 J=1 (odd) -1.49 1.23E+7574.485 21679.11 J=2 (even) 39081.19 J=2 (odd) -2.62 4.70E+5696.184 42718.00 J=0 (even) 57078.05 J=1 (odd) -2.46 4.94E+5796.262 39081.19 J=2 (odd) 51636.42 J=3 (even) 0.52 3.62E+8843.387 39081.19 J=2 (odd) 50934.89 J=2 (even) 0.27 1.77E+8861.826 39081.19 J=2 (odd) 50681.28 J=1 (even) -0.07 8.03E+7986.683 40802.70 J=1 (odd) 50934.89 J=2 (even) -0.45 2.52E+7
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in polonium
Comparison with experiment
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineUp to very recently…
R. McLaughlin, J.O.S.A. 54, 965 (1964)Config. Term J E (cm-1)6p5 2P° 3/2 0.06p4(3P)7s 4P 5/2 44549.36p4(3P)7s 4P 3/2 46233.6
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatine
S. Rothe et al., Nature Commun. 4, 1835 (2013) S. Raeder et al., Hyperfine Interact. 227, 77 (2014)
New experimental analyses (laser spectroscopy – ionization potential)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatine
S. Rothe et al., Nature Commun. 4, 1835 (2013) S. Raeder et al., Hyperfine Interact. 227, 77 (2014)
New experimental analyses (laser spectroscopy – ionization potential)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatinePseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock models
Model A : 6s26p5 + 6s26p4nl (nl = 7s, 7p, 6d, 7d, 5f, 6f)
Model B : Model A + 6s26p3nln’l’
Model C : Model B + 6s26p2nln’l’n’’l’’
Model D : Model C + 6s6p5nl + 6s6p4nln’l’
Model E : Model D + 6p6nl + 6p5nln’l’
Model F : Model E + [1s2 … 5d10] core-polarization (At7+ core : d = 1.8 a.u., rc = 1.12 a.u.)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineEnergy levels within the 6p47p configuration
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineEnergy levels within the 6p47p configuration
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
58778 (J=3/2)
57298 (J=1/2)
57274 (J=7/2)
57158 (J=5/2)
56103 (J=5/2)55969 (J=3/2)
Not to scale !
Experiment Theory(Raeder et al. 2014) (This work)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineEnergy levels within the 6p47p configuration
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
58778 (J=3/2)
57298 (J=1/2)
57274 (J=7/2)
57158 (J=5/2)
56103 (J=5/2)55969 (J=3/2)
Not to scale !
Experiment Theory(Raeder et al. 2014) (This work)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineEnergy levels within the 6p47p configuration
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
58778 (J=3/2)
57298 (J=1/2)
57274 (J=7/2)
57158 (J=5/2)
56103 (J=5/2)55969 (J=3/2)
Not to scale !
Experiment Theory(Raeder et al. 2014) (This work)
Rothe et al. (2013); Raeder et al. (2014)
6p47s
46233.64 (J=3/2)44549.28 (J=5/2)
6p47p
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineEnergy levels within the 6p47p configuration
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
58778 (J=3/2)
57298 (J=1/2)
57274 (J=7/2)
57158 (J=5/2)
56103 (J=5/2)55969 (J=3/2)
Not to scale !
Experiment Theory(Raeder et al. 2014) (This work)
Rothe et al. (2013); Raeder et al. (2014)
6p47s
46233.64 (J=3/2)44549.28 (J=5/2)
6p47p
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineEnergy levels within the 6p47p configuration
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
58778 (J=3/2)
57298 (J=1/2)
57274 (J=7/2)
57158 (J=5/2)
56103 (J=5/2)55969 (J=3/2)
Not to scale !
Experiment Theory(Raeder et al. 2014) (This work)
Rothe et al. (2013); Raeder et al. (2014)
6p47s
46233.64 (J=3/2)44549.28 (J=5/2)
6p47p
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
== 1/2== 7/2
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineEnergy levels within the 6p47p configuration
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
58778 (J=3/2)
57298 (J=1/2)
57274 (J=7/2)
57158 (J=5/2)
56103 (J=5/2)55969 (J=3/2)
Not to scale !
Experiment Theory(Raeder et al. 2014) (This work)
Rothe et al. (2013); Raeder et al. (2014)
6p47s
46233.64 (J=3/2)44549.28 (J=5/2)
6p47p
58805.0 (J=3/2)
57276.7 (J=7/2)57267.8 (J=1/2)
57157.1 (J=5/2)
== 1/2== 7/2
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineClassification of experimentally observed energy levels
E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
0.00 (odd) 3/2 98% 6p5 2P
44549.28 (even) 5/2 78% 6p4(3P)7s 4P 20% 6p4(1D)7s 2D
46233.64 (even) 3/2 60% 6p4(3P)7s 2P 23% 6p4(1D)7s 2D 15% 6p4(3P)7s 4P
57157.10 (odd) 5/2 43% 6p4(3P)7p 2D 35% 6p4(3P)7p 4P 11% 6p4(1D)7p 2D
57267.80 (odd) 7/2 77% 6p4(3P)7p 4D 22% 6p4(1D)7p 2F
57276.70 (odd) 1/2 37% 6p4(3P)7p 2S 24% 6p4(1D)7p 2P 24% 6p4(3P)7p 2P
58805.00 (odd) 3/2 42% 6p4(3P)7p 2P 21% 6p4(3P)7p 4S 12% 6p4(1D)7p 2D
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineClassification of experimentally observed energy levels
E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
0.00 (odd) 3/2 98% 6p5 2P
44549.28 (even) 5/2 78% 6p4(3P)7s 4P 20% 6p4(1D)7s 2D
46233.64 (even) 3/2 60% 6p4(3P)7s 2P 23% 6p4(1D)7s 2D 15% 6p4(3P)7s 4P
57157.10 (odd) 5/2 43% 6p4(3P)7p 2D 35% 6p4(3P)7p 4P 11% 6p4(1D)7p 2D
57267.80 (odd) 7/2 77% 6p4(3P)7p 4D 22% 6p4(1D)7p 2F
57276.70 (odd) 1/2 37% 6p4(3P)7p 2S 24% 6p4(1D)7p 2P 24% 6p4(3P)7p 2P
58805.00 (odd) 3/2 42% 6p4(3P)7p 2P 21% 6p4(3P)7p 4S 12% 6p4(1D)7p 2D
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatine
(nm) Lower level (cm-1) Upper level (cm-1) log gf gA (s-1)
216.225 0.00 J=3/2 (odd) 46233.64 J=3/2 (even) -0.07 1.21E+9
224.401 0.00 J=3/2 (odd) 44549.28 J=5/2 (even) -0.94 1.53E+8
701.279 44549.28 J=5/2 (even) 58805.00 J=3/2 (odd) -0.68 1.83E+8
786.039 44549.28 J=5/2 (even) 57267.80 J=7/2 (odd) 0.43 1.72E+8
792.940 44549.28 J=5/2 (even) 57157.10 J=5/2 (odd) -0.14 4.50E+7
795.240 46233.64 J=3/2 (even) 58805.00 J=3/2 (odd) -0.07 5.74E+7
905.298 46233.64 J=3/2 (even) 57276.70 J=1/2 (odd) -0.17 3.10E+7
915.210 46233.64 J=3/2 (even) 57157.10 J=5/2 (odd) 0.09 5.46E+7
Radiative transitions (oscillator strengths, transition probabilities)
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineIdentification of new high lying odd-parity energy levels
S. Raeder et al., Hyperfine Interact. 227, 77 (2014)
Odd-parity levels
71708.7 cm-1
71376.7 cm-1
70055.4 cm-1
69615.1 cm-1
6p4np
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineIdentification of new high lying odd-parity energy levels
S. Raeder et al., Hyperfine Interact. 227, 77 (2014)
Odd-parity levels
71708.7 cm-1
71376.7 cm-1
70055.4 cm-1
69615.1 cm-1
6p4np
6p414p6p413p6p412p6p411p6p410p
6p49p
6p48p
6p47p
Theory Experiment
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineIdentification of new high lying odd-parity energy levels
E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
69615.1 (odd) 5/2 41% 6p4(3P)9p 2D 36% 6p4(3P)9p 4P 14% 6p4(3P)9p 2D
70055.4 (odd) 3/2 43% 6p4(3P)9p 2P 20% 6p4(3P)9p 4S 12% 6p4(1D)9p 2D
71376.7 (odd) 5/2 41% 6p4(3P)10p 2D 36% 6p4(3P)10p 4P 14% 6p4(3P)10p 2D
71708.7 (odd) 3/2 43% 6p4(3P)10p 2P 20% 6p4(3P)10p 4S 12% 6p4(1D)10p 2D
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineIdentification of new high lying odd-parity energy levels
E(cm-1) J 1st component 2nd component 3rd component
69615.1 (odd) 5/2 41% 6p4(3P)9p 2D 36% 6p4(3P)9p 4P 14% 6p4(3P)9p 2D
70055.4 (odd) 3/2 43% 6p4(3P)9p 2P 20% 6p4(3P)9p 4S 12% 6p4(1D)9p 2D
71376.7 (odd) 5/2 41% 6p4(3P)10p 2D 36% 6p4(3P)10p 4P 14% 6p4(3P)10p 2D
71708.7 (odd) 3/2 43% 6p4(3P)10p 2P 20% 6p4(3P)10p 4S 12% 6p4(1D)10p 2D
4.55
4.36
4.61
4.36
2)( n
REE Ation
Eion = 75150.8 cm-1
RAt = 109737.02 cm-1 (A = 210)
Quantum defect
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Atomic structure calculations in astatineEstimated energy level values in the 6p4(3P)np Rydberg series
Config. Level Estim. (cm-1) Obs. (cm-1) Config. Level Estim. (cm-1) Obs. (cm-1)6p4(3P)8p 2D5/2 4.58 65769 6p4(3P)19p 2D5/2 4.58 74623
2P3/2 4.36 66869 2P3/2 4.36 746396p4(3P)9p 2D5/2 4.58 69534 69615.1 6p4(3P)20p 2D5/2 4.58 74689
2P3/2 4.36 70054 70055.4 2P3/2 4.36 747026p4(3P)10p 2D5/2 4.58 71415 71376.7 6p4(3P)21p 2D5/2 4.58 74744
2P3/2 4.36 71701 71708.7 2P3/2 4.36 747546p4(3P)11p 2D5/2 4.58 72488 6p4(3P)22p 2D5/2 4.58 74789
2P3/2 4.36 72662 2P3/2 4.36 747986p4(3P)12p 2D5/2 4.58 73158 6p4(3P)23p 2D5/2 4.58 74827
2P3/2 4.36 73271 2P3/2 4.36 748356p4(3P)13p 2D5/2 4.58 73603 6p4(3P)24p 2D5/2 4.58 74860
2P3/2 4.36 73681 2P3/2 4.36 748666p4(3P)14p 2D5/2 4.58 73914 6p4(3P)25p 2D5/2 4.58 74888
2P3/2 4.36 73970 2P3/2 4.36 748936p4(3P)15p 2D5/2 4.58 74140 6p4(3P)26p 2D5/2 4.58 74912
2P3/2 4.36 74181 2P3/2 4.36 749166p4(3P)16p 2D5/2 4.58 74309 6p4(3P)27p 2D5/2 4.58 74932
2P3/2 4.36 74341 2P3/2 4.36 749376p4(3P)17p 2D5/2 4.58 74439 6p4(3P)28p 2D5/2 4.58 74951
2P3/2 4.36 74464 2P3/2 4.36 749546p4(3P)18p 2D5/2 4.58 74541 6p4(3P)29p 2D5/2 4.58 74967
2P3/2 4.36 74561 2P3/2 4.36 74970
Université de Liège Pascal Quinet ([email protected]) | BriX Workshop, Liège, 27 – 28 May 2015
Summary and conclusions
Theoretical investigation of polonium and astatine atomic structures
Pseudo-relativistic Hartree-Fock method
Polonium : - Spectroscopic designation of 6p37p, 6p36d, 6p37s and 6p37d energy levels - Radiative transition parameters for 31 spectral lines in the wavelength region 175 – 987 nm
Astatine : - Spectroscopic designation of 4 levels belonging to 6p47p - Radiative transition parameters for 8 spectral lines in the wavelength region 216 – 915 nm - Identification of 4 new levels in 6p49p and 6p410p configurations - Predicted energies for levels within the 6p4np Rydberg series
Thank you for your attention