Upload
joerg-schmitz
View
294
Download
22
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A new concept for dispersing agents in aqueous coatings
JoÈrg Schmitz*, Harald Frommelius, Ulrich Pegelow, Heinz-GuÈnther Schulte, Rainer HoÈfer
Henkel KGaA, Henkelstr. 67, 40191 DuÈsseldorf, Germany
Received 15 July 1998; accepted 20 February 1999
Abstract
After a short overview about the development of synthetic dispersing agents for solvent-borne coatings up to the actual state of technique,
analogous concepts of polymeric additives for water-borne coatings are introduced. The performance of these polyfunctional dispersants will
be critically reviewed and described in comparison to dispersing agents based on new concepts. With these new concepts using mono- and
difunctional oleochemical agents or a combination of them it is often possible to reach better performance than with polyfunctional polymers.
During our study different physicochemical methods (Zeta potential, adsorption, desorption) and paint application tests including numerous
binders and pigments were done. These investigations lead to the discussion of new models for the dispersing of pigments in water-borne
coatings and to more knowledge about the design of a dispersant to reach high gloss, optimal rub-out and high color-strength. Furthermore
the formulation of solvent- and resin-free water-borne pigment pastes is possible using dispersing agents selected by the new concepts.
q 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Dispersing agents; Pigment-stabilisation; Oleochemical block co-polymers; Monofunctional dispersants; Aololitive combinations
1. Introduction
In the colorful world of paints and coatings pigments are
an important component in the formulation. These pigments
are made to have an optimum particle size yields maximum
hiding power and color strength. During transportation and
storage, however, the so called primary particles build up to
form agglomerates and aggregates. In the process of paint
production it is important to break down these structures
back into ®ne particles and to stabilize this state [1±3].
Only this provides good color strength [4,5], good color
stability [6±8] and also prevents pigment settling [9,10].
First step in the dispersion process is the wetting of the
particles by the liquid phase, which consists of mainly
solvent and binder, followed by mechanical destruction of
the agglomerates. Stabilizing this stage and preventing reag-
glomeration is the designated task of the dispersing agent
[11].
There is a signi®cant difference in this process between
solvent-borne and water-borne systems. The wetting step in
solvent-borne systems is generally quite easy because of the
low surface tension of ordinary solvents and resins. Special
additives to improve wetting are not required.
² Xylene: 30 mN/m
² Melamine resins: 58 mN/m
² Butylacetate: 25 mN/m
² Oil-free polyesters: 47 mN/m
² White spirit: 24 mN/m
² PMMA: 41 mN/m
² Soya-bean long oil alkyd: 37 mN/m
Due to the extremely high surface tension of water,
special additives are required to lower the surface tension
and enable suf®cient pigment wetting [12]
² Aqueous dispersions: 35±45 mN/m
² Water: 72.7 mN/m
In addition, stabilization of pigments in aqueous systems
functions by a different mechanism. While in solvent-borne
systems a sterical barrier prevents reagglomeration
[2,13,14] water-borne systems require the ionic mechanism
of electrostatic repulsion [2,16]. In architectural latex
paints, by far the largest area of water-based paints, anionic
dispersing agents like polyacrylic acid [15] are widely used.
2. Fundamentals of dispersing agents in solvent-bornesystems
Already in 1957 Henkel introduced their ®rst synthetic
dispersing agent under the name of Texaphorw [17]. Mono-
functional dispersing agents like Texaphor provide good
stabilization of inorganic pigments and ef®ciently prevent
Progress in Organic Coatings 35 (1999) 191±196
0300-9440/99/$ - see front matter q 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
PII: S0300-9440(99)00028-4
* Corresponding author.
pigment sedimentation. With the introduction of high grade
organic pigments as well as extremely durable but poorly
wetting polyacrylic binders, the need for the development of
new dispersants arose. Those products are oligomeric to
polymeric and have a plurality of anchoring groups
[2,3,18±21] (Fig. 1).
The introduction of two pack polyurethane systems in the
automotive re®nish and even OEM markets boosted the
demand for polymeric dispersants. Various structures of
anchoring groups and steric chains are discussed in the
literature.
3. Structures of dispersing agents for aqueous systems
The area of aqueous coatings is dominated by architec-
tural latex coatings where inorganic pigments and ®llers are
stabilized by polyacrylic acid (PAS) [15] or maleic acid
derivatives. Organic pigments in colorants were stabilized
mainly with alkyl phenol ethoxylates [22,23]. With the
appearance of new resins for aqueous industrial coatings
in recent years better additives which allow for higher
gloss, better color stability and better water resistance had
to be developed. Furthermore, paint formulators are moving
away from nonyl phenol ethoxylates because of ecotoxico-
logical discussions connected to them [24].
For the development of a new class of dispersants for
aqueous coatings, concepts used in solvent-based coatings
were initially transfered to the water-borne ®eld. Several
additive suppliers introduced individual polyfunctional
products [25±27] with the general structure as follows
(Fig. 2):
² anchoring groups with good adhesion to pigments;
² ionic groups for electrostatic stabilization;
² bulky hydrophilic groups for water-phase steric stabili-
zation.
This fairly new generation of additives has been available
to the market for several years. Even though this concept
looks convincing, market success seems to be quite limited.
The fairly high price of the products also hurts market pene-
tration.
These were the reasons why Henkel started searching for
alternative concepts based on oleochemical raw materials.
An interesting structure was found in the latex polymeriza-
tion surfactant department. This material was developed as a
substitute for Nonylphenolethoxylates [28] and can be
described as monofunctional Oleo-Alkyleneoxide Block
co-polymer (Oleo ABC) (Fig. 3). Variations of this structure
lead to longer or shorter chain, ionic or alkyleneoxide-free
monofunctional types. In addition, similarly constructed di-
and trimer structures of the ABC-compounds are available.
In cases where electrostatic stabilization is required,
oligofunctional phosphonates provide a reasonable alterna-
tive to polyacrylic acid and maleic acid copolymers with
excellent properties (Fig. 4).
Based on these building blocks the new concept combines
selected mono- or oligofunctional molecules to a universal
mixture at a reasonable cost (Fig. 5).
In the practical work discussed later a proof of this
concept is examined. Aside from the principal work of
pigment dispersing some structure/performance relations
of oleo ABCs will be reported. The following work was
carried out:
² Physicochemical measurements (adsorption and deso-
rbtion studies, Zeta-potential),
² Coating lab tests in aqueous coatings.
² Tests in pigment pastes.
J. Schmitz et al. / Progress in Organic Coatings 35 (1999) 191±196192
Fig. 1. Dispersants for solvent-based coatings.
Fig. 2. Polyfunctional dispersants for aqueous coatings.
4. Physicochemical measurements
4.1. Zeta-potential
Zeta-potential measurements were carried out with the
Laser Zee Meler 501 (Pen Kern).
As expected, non-ionic oleo-ABCs do not signi®cantly
in¯uence the Zeta-potential. The polyfunctional polymeric
additives with a limited number of ionic groups moderately
reduce the Zeta potential (to higher negative numbers), e.g.
in case of titanium dioxide (Kronos 2310) from 2 30 to 245 mV. Other ionic oleo-ABCs as well as polyacrylic acid
derivatives and the organophosphonates create even higher
negative values, up to 2 60 mV on TiO2. This ®gure means
that electrostatic stabilization is the dominant and effective
stabilization mechanism.
4.2. Quantities of absorbed dispersant on Titanium dioxide
Results:
² excellent absorption of mono-oleo-ABCs with low HLB
(approx. 2 mg/m2);
² no adsorption of mono-oleo-ABCs with medium and
high HLB;
² increased adsorption of dimer and trimer oleo-ABCs
compared to monomeric ones of equal HLB;
² good adsorption of ionic mono-oleo-ABCs (0.8 mg/m2);
² good adsorption of polyfunctional (polymeric) disper-
sants (0.8 mg/m2) little adsorption of polyacrylic acid
and oligophosphonates (0.3 mg/m2).
As expected hydrophobic organic pigments such as Chro-
mophthalred 2B (Ciba) and Heliogenblue L 6900 (BASF)
gave signi®cantly different results:
² excellent adsorption of mono-oleo-ABCs with low and
medium HLB (1.5±2 mg/m2);,
² good adsorption of ionic and non-ionic mono-oleo-ABCs
with high HLB-value (approx. 1 mg/m2);
² good adsorption of dimer and trimer oleo-ABCs and
polyfunctional (polymeric) types (0.5±0.8 mg/m2);
² no adsorption of polyacrylic acid and oligophosphonates.
4.3. Comprehensive desorption studies
A certain amount of the particular dispersant was ®rst
adsorbed on the pigment surface and the loaded pigment
separated from the solution. This was mixed with pure
water and the amount of desorbed pigment determined
according to DIN 38409.
² Monofunctional types desorb with 5% less than difunc-
tional (15%) and polyfunctional types (11%).
² In aqueous systems it seems that the amount of adsorbed
material on the pigment surface is much more deter-
mined by the HLB than by the number of anchoring
groups.
² Polyfunctional types do not show an advantage
compared to monofunctional types per se.
5. Results in aqueous coatings
A mixture of TiO2 and Phthaloblue (20:1) was used as
reference. Water-based alkyds and polyesters, polyurethane
and polyacrylate dispersions as well as alkyd and polyester
emulsions were studied. Some resins were air drying, others
stoving or two-pack-systems.
Two general ®ndings of these studies were of particular
interest:
(1) The binders had a strong in¯uence on the pigment
dispersing process. We could distinguish between: (a)
good wetting resins (water-soluble alkyds, polyesters
and polyurethane dispersions) and (b) non-wetting resins
J. Schmitz et al. / Progress in Organic Coatings 35 (1999) 191±196 193
Fig. 3. New Oleo-Alkyleneoxide-Block-Copolymer dispersants.
Fig. 4. Ionic dispersants for aqueous coatings.
(emulsion polymers and emulsi®er stabilized polyesters,
alkyds and epoxies).
Conclusion 1: The resin has a strong in¯uence on the
selection of the correct dispersant.
(2) The second general ®nding was that gloss, color
strength and rub-out were not simultaneously determined
by a speci®c chemical structure. Furthermore, certain
chemical structures will give high gloss, others high
color strength and others excellent rub-out.
Conclusion 2: The combination of different chemical
structures enable optimal gloss, color strength and rub out.
6. Correlation of physicochemical measurements withpractical results
The statistical results out of tests with 22 different resins
gave clear indications regarding suitable dispersants and
dispersant combinations. They correlate very well with the
physicochemical studies. Also, some structure/performance
correlations were found. The results were also useful in
®nding new effective dispersant combinations.
6.1. Color strength
To achieve an excellent color strength in a paint with a
pigment mixture of an inorganic pigment like TiO2 and a
hydrophobic organic pigment like Heliogenblue the disper-
sant has to have a good adsorption on the organic pigment
and good stabilizing properties. These requirements,
however, are contradictory. A hydrophobic additive (low
HLB) shows strong adsorption. The short hydrophilic
chain on the other hand can only provide limited steric
stabilization. The compromise here is equivalent to the
well-known nonylphenol ethoxylate £ 10EO [20] in the
range of medium HLB-values.
The ionic and oligomeric types have a small adsorption
potential and showed poor results. Polyacrylic acid and
oligophosphonates do not adsorb on organic pigments and
are not useful here. With regard to the nature of the resin we
did not ®nd any signi®cant in¯uence on color strength.
A mono-ole-ABC with medium HLB gives good color
strength also in dispersant mixtures even if the other compo-
nents by themselves do not give good results with regard to
color strength.
6.2. Rub-out
For a good rub-out, wetting and stabilizing of the organic
and the inorganic pigment are important. Contrary to color
strength, the nature of the resin has signi®cant impact on
rub-out.
Resins with pigment-wetting properties often provide
stabilization of the inorganic pigment, and, in some cases
even the organic pigment. Best results are achieved with an
additive which wets and stabilizes the organic pigment
(similar to color strength).
In formulations where the resin is unable to wet and
stabilize the pigments this has to be done entirely by the
dispersant. Here additives are required which will adsorb on
inorganic as well as organic pigments and provide both
excellent steric and electrostatic stabilization. Ionic Mono-
Oleo-ABCs, polyfunctional additives and additive-mixtures
are the only dispersants capable of this.
Oleo ABCs with low HLB-values do absorb on both
kinds of pigments but their steric stabilization is poor
because of their short hydrophilic chain.
J. Schmitz et al. / Progress in Organic Coatings 35 (1999) 191±196194
Fig. 5. The new concept of additiv-mixtures for aqueous coatings.
Table 1
Results in pigments pastes
Organic pastes Inorganic pastes
Mono-Oleo-ABC (low HLB) 11 11
Mono-Oleo-ABC (medium HLB) Hydropalat 1080 111 0
Mono-Oleo-ABC (high HLB) 11 0
Ionic Mono-Oleo-ABC 1 1
Tri-Oleo-ABC (medium HLB) 1 11
Oligophosphonate 0 1
Mono-Oleo-ABC 1 Oligophosphonate Hydropalat 1080 1
Hydropalat 3204
11 111
J. Schmitz et al. / Progress in Organic Coatings 35 (1999) 191±196 195
Tab
le2
Dis
per
san
tre
com
men
dat
ion
sfo
raq
ueo
us
coat
ing
s
Ad
dit
ive
Ty
pe
Sta
bil
izat
ion
Posi
tive
in¯
uen
ceon:
Posi
tive
in:
Ele
ctro
-
stas
tic
Ste
ric
Org
an.
pig
men
ts
Anorg
pig
men
ts
Glo
ssW
ater
resi
stan
ce
Colo
r-
acce
pta
nce
Poorl
y
wet
ting
resi
ns
Good
wet
ting
resi
ns
2K
-PU
R
syst
ems
Dis
po
nil
O5
Mo
no
-Ole
o-A
BC
0(1
)1
11
11
11
12K
-Epoxy-S
yst
ems
Hy
dro
pal
at5
35
NO
lig
oca
rbo
xy
late
11
01
01
10
21
1W
ater
-solu
ble
resi
ns
Hy
dro
pal
atz
75
9O
lig
oph
osp
ho
nsaÈ
ure
11
02
11
02
01
01
TiO
2-s
lurr
ys
and
pas
tes
Hy
dro
pal
at8
93
Mo
no
-Ole
o-A
mid
0(1
)1
11
11
01
11
Hig
hglo
ssco
atin
gs
Hy
dro
pal
at1
08
0M
ono
-ole
o-A
BC
01
11
21
11
11
11
1O
rgan
icpig
men
tpas
tes
Hy
dro
pal
at3
03
7O
lig
o-o
leo
-AB
C0
11
21
11
11
11
Colo
r-ac
cepta
nce
Hy
dro
pal
at3
06
5M
ono
-ole
o-A
BC
01
11
21
01
11
11
1O
rgan
icpig
men
tpas
tes
Hy
dro
pal
at3
20
4A
min
esa
lto
f7
59
11
02
11
02
01
02
TiO
2sl
urr
ys
and
pas
tes
Hy
dro
pal
at3
21
6A
dd
itiv
em
ixtu
re1
11
11
11
10
11
11
11
Univ
ersa
lin
aqueo
us
coat
ings
Hy
dro
pal
at3
27
5P
oly
-Ole
o-A
BC
11
11
10
11
11
1P
igm
ent
pas
tes
Additive mixtures perform very well with regard to rub-
out as long as they contain one component with suf®cient
stabilization for inorganic and organic pigments or one
component for inorganic and another component for organic
pigments.
6.3. Gloss
High gloss values are determined by two factors. First, all
pigments must be optimally stabilized (see also rub-out).
Secondly the (absorbed) additive must be very compatible
with the resin.
This was the case in most of the studied systems with
Mono-Oleo-ABCs with low HLB-values. Reduced gloss is
caused by additives with higher HLB-values. Ionic types
also lower the gloss depending on their content of ionic
moieties.
Mono-Oleo-ABCs with low HLB-values in additive
mixtures generally have a positive in¯uence on gloss.
7. Results in pigment pastes
Due to economical advantages, pigment pastes have
become more important in recent years [29]. Besides the
well established use of pastes in on-site mixing systems in
automotive re®nish or architectural tint shops, more and
more paint companies use ready made pastes for the manu-
facture of various kinds of industrial, automotive or wood
paints. The need for solvent-and binder-free pastes based on
Nonylphenol-free dispersants has become more important
[24].
Some of the above mentioned dispersants are very suita-
ble for use in pigment pastes. Tables 1 and 2 give an over-
view of our results.
8. Conclusions
Physicochemical and technological results of this work
proof that a direct transfer of knowledge from the classical
solvent borne systems is only possible to a certain extend.
The selection of a suitable dispersing agent is not only
in¯uenced by the type of pigment but often to a larger extent
by the type of binder.
Furthermore the properties high gloss, excellent color
strength and color stability are often linked to individual
agents while in solvent-borne systems often one additive
ful®ls all requirements. Water-based coatings, therefore,
need several different additives or sophisticated combina-
tions of them.
A combination of additives with a compatible agent with
low HLB (for high gloss), an (often ionic) agent with excel-
lent adsorption on inorganic surfaces (good rub-out), and
another one with strong adsorption on organic pigments
(good color strength/rub-out) creates an optimal additive.
Such an additive like Hydropalat 3216, provides universal
performance in a variety of different resins with numerous
pigments.
To formulate solvent- and binder-free pigment concen-
trates with inorganic and organic pigments, the polyfunc-
tional additive Hydropalat 3275 does an excellent job.
However, the monofunctional Hydropalat 1080 for organic
pigments and a combination of Hydropalat 1080 with
Hydropalat 3204 for inorganic pigments respectively often
provides a reasonable alternative.
References
[1] J. SchroÈder, Farbe Lack 91 (1995) 11.
[2] J.H. Bielemann, Stoye, Freitag: Lackharze: Chemie, Eigenschaften
und Anwendungen, Hanser Veriag, MuÈnchen, 1996 p. 396.
[3] M. Knospe, W. Scholz, Farbe Lack 96 (1990) 120.
[4] A. Brockes, Optik 21 (1964) 550.
[5] H.G. VoÈlz, Fortschntte in den PruÈfmethoden der optischen
Eigenschaften von Pigmenten, Fatipec-Kongress, 1972, Florenz
[6] F. Haselmeyer, J. Water Borne, Coat. (1984) 2.
[7] V.T. Crowl, J. Oil, Col. Chem. Assoc. 50 (1967) 1023.
[8] T.C. Patton, Paint Flow and Pigment Dispersion, 2nd ed., Wiley, New
York, 1979.
[9] N. Ekdawi, R.J. Hunter, Coll. Surf. 15 (1985) 147.
[10] H. Lange, Kolloid Zeitschr.: Zeitschrift f. Polymere 211 (1966) 106.
[11] M. Liphard, W. von Rybinski, L. Schieferstein, Farbe Lack 97 (1991)
18.
[12] J. Schwarz, J. Coat. Technol. 64 (1992) 65.
[13] I. Marcovic, R. Ottewill, Coll. Surf. 24 (1987) 69.
[14] J. Schroder, Farbe Lack 93 (1987) 715.
[15] R.N. Hidred, Farbe Lack 96 (1990) 857.
[16] R. Craft, Modem Paint Coat. (1991) 38.
[17] C. Boller, W. GruÈndel, A. Kristakler, DE-PS 940929, 1952 (DEHY-
DAG); W. GruÈndel, DE-PS 1188233, 1957 (DEHYDAG).
[18] H. van den Haak, Waterborne, Higher Solids and Powder Symp., New
Orleans, 1997
[19] B. Schreck, M. Liphard, W. Greb, Farbe Lack 98 (1992) 845.
[20] A. Cowley, M. Goode, Farbe Lack 98 (1992) 425.
[21] J.D. Scho®eld, in: L.J. Calbo (Ed.), Handbook of Coating Additives,
2, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1992, pp. 71.
[22] J.H. Bielemann, Farbe Lack 102 (1996) 91.
[23] F. Miano, et al., Coll. Surf. 62 (1962) 11.
[24] OECD document ENV/Chem, 1991, p. 16
[25] D.J. Cartridge, Polymers Paint Color J. 10 (1994) 184.
[26] J.H. Bielemann, Polymers Paint Color J. 7 (1995) 21.
[27] W. Scholz, Welt der Farben 6 (1996) 11.
[28] C. Baumann, D. Feustel, U. Held, R. HoÈfer, Welt der Farben 2 (1996)
15.
[29] H.R. NiederhaÈusem, Farbe Lack 101 (1995) 113.
J. Schmitz et al. / Progress in Organic Coatings 35 (1999) 191±196196