24
‘A MUTUAL CONFRONTATION OF STRUCTURE AND ACCIDENT’ A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCHING HOW LAWYER- MENTORS ENGAGE WITH SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING 1

‘A Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

‘A Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’. A framework for Researching how lawyer-Mentors engage with scholarship of teaching. Kristoffer Greaves Australian Lawyer PLT Practitioner PhD Candidate – Deakin University School of Education. Purpose of Legal Profession Acts. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

1

‘A MUTUAL CONFRONTATION OF STRUCTURE AND ACCIDENT’

A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCHING HOW LAWYER-MENTORS ENGAGE WITH SCHOLARSHIP OF TEACHING

Page 2: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

2

Page 3: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

3

Page 4: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

4

Kristoffer GreavesAustralian LawyerPLT Practitioner

PhD Candidate – Deakin UniversitySchool of Education

Page 5: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

5

Page 6: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

6

Page 7: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

7

Page 8: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

8

Page 9: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

9

Purpose of Legal Profession Acts

Protect Clients

Protect Administration of

Justice

Assure Quality of Legal Services

Page 10: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

10

Page 11: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

11

• PLT practitioners are lawyers• Lawyers are officers of the court• Paramount duty• Applies to PLT work?• Would SoTL support this work?

Page 12: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

12

Page 13: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

13

2012

Page 14: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

14

Page 15: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

15

Guiding Questions for PLT Practitioners

Motivation to engage with SoTL?

Capacity to engage?

Employer symbolic support?

Employer allocation of resources?

Page 16: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

16

New SoTL Knowledge Enters…?

Practice is

Pedagogy

Pedagogy is

Practice

Page 17: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

17

Page 18: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

18

Dynamic dialogue with the materials and means of execution

Page 19: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

19

Data: Texts + People

Page 20: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

20

Theory Alert!!!

Page 21: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

21

Page 22: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

22

“I’ve no time for learning theory – give me the elevator pitch”

Anon

Page 23: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

23

Engaging with SoTL

• Support PLT practitioners• More than one way to engage with SoTL• Bricolage a flexible practice-friendly approach• Prospects for improved satisfaction and

quality

Page 24: ‘A  Mutual Confrontation of Structure and Accident’

24