24
A multi-model approach to better understanding the robustness of management of Pacific hake to environmental variability Kristin Marshall 1 , Nis Jacobsen 1,2 , Isaac Kaplan 1 , Kirstin Holsman 3 , and Grant Adams 4 , Northwest Fisheries Science Center 1 Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2 National Research Council 3 Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 4 University of Washington

A multi-model approach to better understanding the ......A multi-model approach to better understanding the robustness of management of Pacific hake to environmental variability Kristin

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • A multi-model approach to better understanding the robustness of

    management of Pacific hake to environmental variability

    Kristin Marshall1, Nis Jacobsen1,2, Isaac Kaplan1, Kirstin Holsman3, and Grant Adams4,

    Northwest Fisheries Science Center

    1Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2National Research Council 3Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 4University of Washington

  • What is climate-robust fisheries management?

    Resilient OR Responsive

  • Benson et al. 2018 Fish and Fisheries

    Responsivecatch limits

    Resilient harvest control rules

  • How do we know if we’ve achieved climate-robust management?

    • Specify goals, objectives AND measure performance

    • Test robustness to a wide range of uncertainties

  • MSE as a collaborative, iterative process

    SurveysAssessmentDecision Rule

  • Pacific Hake Fishery and Management• International Pacific Whiting Treaty

    (2003)• 74/26 percent of annual quota allocated

    to US/CA• Harvest Control Rule F-SPR 40:10

    Hake

    West Coast US Groundfish Landings

    Hake biomass relative to unfishedFis

    hing m

    ortal

    ity ra

    te

    10% 40% 100%

  • More fish, younger fish, in US than Canada

    Agostini et al. 2006Malick et al. in review

  • Co-created (managers, industry, and scientists) goals for this iteration of the Hake MSE:

    • Evaluate the performance of current hake management procedures under alternative hypotheses about current and future environmental conditions

    • Better understand the effects of hake distribution and movement on both countries’ ability to catch fish

    • Better understand how fishing in each country affects the availability of fish to the other country in future years

  • Tools for evaluating climate-robust management for hake

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Northwest Fisheries Science Center

    • List item 1• List item 2

    • List item 3• List item 4

    Operating Model Estimation Model

    Management model

    Spatially explicit

    Environ. drivers

    Trophic dynamics

    Prev. Hake MSE model

    X X

    Current Hake MSE model

    X X X X

    Atlantis ecosystem model

    X X X In progress X

    CEATTLE-Hake

    X X X X

  • Generalized closed-loop simulation model for MSE

    Operating modelHypotheses about how the biological system and fishery operates

    Observation modelData generation from fishery and survey

    Estimation modelSimulates stock assessment

    Management modelTranslates assessment model output to catch advice for the next year

    10

  • Climate change inspired movement scenarios

    • Linearly increase the maximum movement rate over time

    • Linearly decrease the proportion of fish returning to US to spawn

    • Compare 3 scenarios – no change to movement, moderate increase in movement, and dramatic increase in movement

  • Spawning biomass distribution in the future

    Canada

    USA

    Jacobsen et al. in prep

    Status QuoModerate Increase

    Dramatic Increase

  • Median Catch (thousand mt)

    Average annual variability in Catch

    Coastwide performance metrics

    1) No climate change effect

    2) Moderate increase in movement

    3) Dramatic increase in movement

    Proportion of years with fishery closure

    Jacobsen et al. in prepIncreasing movement

  • Conclusions thus far• Current management procedure shows sensitivity to dramatic changes in movement rate

    (relatively robust to small changes)

    • If model-assumed movement rates occurred, status quo management would lead to lower total catch, higher variation in catch, and lower spawning biomass

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 14

  • Tools for evaluating climate-robust management for hake

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Northwest Fisheries Science Center

    • List item 1• List item 2

    • List item 3• List item 4

    Operating Model Estimation Model

    Management model

    Spatially explicit

    Environ. drivers

    Trophic dynamics

    Prev. Hake MSE model

    X X

    Current Hake MSE model

    X X X X

    Atlantis ecosystem model

    X X X In progress X

    CEATTLE-Hake

    X X X X

  • Ecosystem-Based Harvest Control Rules for Norwegian and US Ecosystems

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 16

    Kaplan et al. in reviewHake biomass relative to unfished

    Hake

    Fish

    ing m

    ortal

    ity ra

    te10% 40% 100%

    Constant harvest at FMSY

    Threshold harvest rule on hake

    Hake threshold rule

  • U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 17

    Kaplan et al. in review

  • Tools for evaluating climate-robust management for hake

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Northwest Fisheries Science Center

    • List item 1• List item 2

    • List item 3• List item 4

    Operating Model Estimation Model

    Management model

    Spatially explicit

    Environ. drivers

    Trophic dynamics

    Previous MSE model

    X X

    Current Hake MSE model

    X X X X

    Atlantis ecosystem model

    X X X In progress X

    CEATTLE-Hake

    X X X X

  • CEATTLE Multi-species model

    Walleye pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus)

    Arrowtooth flounder(Atheresthes stomias)

    Pacific cod(Gadus macrocephalus)

    Eastern Bering Sea, Alaska, USA

    W@Age~f(Temperature)Pred/prey~f(Temperature)

    Climate-Enhanced, Age-based model with Temperature-specific Trophic Linkages and Energetics

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 19

    Holsman et al.

  • CEATTLE-EBS: Options

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 20

    • Empirical diets• Bioenergetics

    Mortality

    • Empirical• VonB with Temp

    Weight @ Age

    • Climate-S/R• S/R• mean R

    Rec

    • Climate ABC• MMSY• MEY• SPR• Aggregate MSY

    HCRs

    Holsman et al.

    https://github.com/grantdadams/Rceattle

    https://github.com/grantdadams/Rceattle

  • Potential for CEATTLE-Hake as operating model

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 21

    • Empirical diets

    • Bioenergetics

    Mortality

    VonB with Temp

    Weight @ Age

    • Climate-S/R• S/R

    Rec

  • Tools for evaluating climate-robust management for hake

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Northwest Fisheries Science Center

    • List item 1• List item 2

    • List item 3• List item 4

    Operating Model Estimation Model

    Management model

    Spatially explicit

    Environ. drivers

    Trophic dynamics

    Previous MSE model

    X X

    Current Hake MSE model

    X X X X

    Atlantis ecosystem model

    X X X In progress X

    CEATTLE-Hake

    X X X X

  • Is current management strategy for Pacific hake climate-ready?

    • Testing robustness of current management to dramatic changes in environment is a first step

    • Single-species spatial model suggests some resilience

    • Testing robustness to a wider range of uncertainties is underway

  • Thank you!

    U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Pag

    [email protected]

    A multi-model approach to better understanding the robustness of management of Pacific hake to environmental variabilityWhat is climate-robust fisheries management?Slide Number 3How do we know if we’ve achieved climate-robust management?MSE as a collaborative, iterative processPacific Hake Fishery and ManagementMore fish, younger fish, in US than CanadaCo-created (managers, industry, and scientists) goals for this iteration of the Hake MSE:Tools for evaluating climate-robust management for hakeGeneralized closed-loop simulation model for MSEClimate change inspired movement scenariosSpawning biomass distribution in the futureCoastwide performance metricsConclusions thus farTools for evaluating climate-robust management for hakeEcosystem-Based Harvest Control Rules for Norwegian and US EcosystemsSlide Number 17Tools for evaluating climate-robust management for hakeCEATTLE Multi-species modelCEATTLE-EBS: OptionsPotential for CEATTLE-Hake as operating modelTools for evaluating climate-robust management for hakeIs current management strategy for Pacific hake climate-ready?Thank you!