Upload
yi-zhang
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 23 (2005) 175–181
www.elsevier.com/locate/chaos
A modified B€acklund transformation andmulti-soliton solution for the Boussinesq equation
Yi Zhang a,b,*, Deng-yuan Chen b
a Department of Mathematics, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, PR Chinab Department of Mathematics, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200436, PR China
Accepted 5 April 2004
Communicated by Prof. M. Wadati
Abstract
It is shown that a modified B€acklund transformation is presented by the dependent variable transformation. Starting
from it, a new representation of N-soliton solution and a class of novel multi-soliton solution of the Boussinesq
equation have been derived. We also find the novel soliton solution may be deduced by limiting.
� 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
In the soliton theory, a remarkable aspect is that the nonlinear evolution equations governing them are exactly
solvable. Especially, it has been shown by analytical investigations that there is the existence of N -soliton solution
describing multiple collision solutions is a common algebraic feature of these nonlinear evolution equations. There
exists several direct methods to construct N-soliton solution, among them the bilinear method [1]. The advantage of this
method is that the N -soliton solution is represented by a purely algebraic procedure. It is significant to search for
bilinear N-soliton solution representation of a given nonlinear evolution equations in the investigation of its integra-
bility [2–7]. Not only has the Hirota bilinear method provide a powerful tool in searching for soliton solution, but it has
also a close relationship to the B€acklund transformations (BTs). By applying well chosen exchange formulas, bilinear
BTs can been derived for a variety of soliton equations [8–12]. These bilinear BTs consist of a set of parameter
dependent bilinear equations. Starting from the bilinear BTs, the multi-soliton solution of the nonlinear evolution
equations may be generated and the structure of the solution be clarified.
In this paper we present a new form BTs in bilinear which has the much more desirable property of transforming
between N -soliton and N þ 1-soliton solution of the Boussinesq equation. The mathematics used here is only an ele-
mentary theory of linear partial differential equation. We also present a process to show that the new representation of
N -soliton solution and the representation of the bilinear equations are the same for recovering the solutions of the
Boussinesq equation. The inverse scattering scheme for the Boussinesq equation has a third order eigenvalue equation,
which is discovered by Zakharov [13].
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we will present a modified bilinear BTs for the Boussinesq equation.
In Section 3, based on the modified bilinear BTs, a new representation of N -soliton solution for the Boussinesq equation
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: [email protected] (Y. Zhang).
0960-0779/$ - see front matter � 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2004.04.006
176 Y. Zhang, D. Chen / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 23 (2005) 175–181
is obtained in agreement with Hirota’s standard expression. In Section 4, some exact novel solutions of equation are
found by modified bilinear BTs. Finally Section 5 summarizes the results.
2. A modified form of BT for the Boussinesq equation
The Boussinesq equation reads [14]
utt � uxx � ð3u2Þxx � uxxxx ¼ 0; ð2:1Þ
which describes motions of long waves in one-dimensional arises in a nonlinear lattices and in shallow water under
gravity. Through the dependent variable transformation
u ¼ 2ðln f Þxx; ð2:2Þ
Eq. (2.1) becomes
ðD2t � D2
x � D4xÞf � f ¼ 0; ð2:3Þ
where defining
Dmx D
nt f � g ¼ ð@x � @x0 Þmð@t � @t0 Þnf ðx; tÞgðx0; t0Þ j x0¼x;t0¼t:
Before we proceed, it is instructive to recall the following facts. The Boussinesq equation is also a continuum
approximation to equation for one-dimensional nonlinear lattices. Toda and Wadati proposed a one-dimensional
nonlinear lattice with neighboring particles interacting through an exponential potential function, which admits exact
analytic solution [15]; Wadati also presented the B€acklund transformation too [16]. By continuing, the multi-soliton
solution for Eq. (2.1) can be constructed; Hirota and Satsuma later obtained intuitively general N-soliton solution [9].
Let f be a solution of Eq. (2.3) and g another one of the same equation. The BTs of Eq. (2.1) which relate f and g in
bilinear forms are given by [17]
ðDt þ aD2xÞf � g ¼ 0; ð2:4Þ
ðaDtDx þ Dx þ D3xÞf � g ¼ kfg; ð2:5Þ
where k is an arbitrary parameter and a2 ¼ �3.
In order to obtain a modified BT in bilinear form, we make
f ! enf ; ð2:6Þ
g ! egg; ð2:7Þ
where n ¼ x1t þ k1xþ nð0Þ; g ¼ r1t þ h1xþ gð0Þ; nð0Þ; gð0Þ are arbitrary constants.
By expanding f ; g in the following way
f ¼ 1þ ef ð1Þ þ e2f ð2Þ þ e3f ð3Þ þ � � � ; ð2:8Þ
g ¼ 1þ egð1Þ þ e2gð2Þ þ e3gð3Þ þ � � � ; ð2:9Þ
then Eqs. (2.6) and (2.7) are transformed into
½Dt þ ðx1 � r1Þ�f � g þ a½Dx þ ðk1 � h1Þ�2f � g ¼ 0; ð2:10Þ
faDx þ ðk1 � h1Þ½Dt þ ðx1 � r1Þ� þ ½Dx þ ðk1 � h1Þ�3gf � g ¼ kfg ð2:11Þ
respectively, where using the following bilinear operator identity
Dmt D
nxe
nf � egg ¼ enþgðDt þ x1 � r1ÞmðDx þ k1 � h1Þnf � g; ð2:12Þ
equating the constant terms, we have
x1 þ ak21 ¼ 0; ð2:13Þ
ak1x1 þ k31 � k ¼ 0: ð2:14Þ
Y. Zhang, D. Chen / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 23 (2005) 175–181 177
Thus we we arrive at the modified BTs of Boussinesq equation as follows
ðDt þ aD2x þ 2akDxÞf � g ¼ 0; ð2:15Þ
½akDt þ aDtDx þ ð1þ 6k2ÞDx þ 3kD2x þ D3
x �f � g ¼ 0; ð2:16Þ
where k is an arbitrary parameter. Then, from the bilinear BTs (2.15) and (2.16), we can obtain the exact multi-soliton
solutions for the Boussinesq equation.
3. A new representation of N-soliton solution for the Boussinesq equation
In this section, we start from the bilinear BTs (2.15) and (2.16) and derive a new representation of N -soliton solution
for the Boussinesq equation.
In order to obtain solution of Eqs. (2.15) and (2.16), we substitute (2.8) and (2.9) into (2.15) and (2.16) and equating
coefficients of �, yields a system of linear equation to be solved.
f ð1Þt þ af ð1Þ
xx þ 2akf ð1Þx � gð1Þt þ agð1Þxx � 2akgð1Þx ¼ 0; ð3:1aÞ
af ð1Þtx þ akf ð1Þ
t þ ð1þ 6k2Þf ð1Þx þ 3kf ð1Þ
xx þ f ð1Þxxx þ agð1Þtx � akgð1Þt � ð1þ 6k2Þgð1Þx þ 3kgð1Þxx � gð1Þxxx ¼ 0; ð3:1bÞ
f ð2Þt þ af ð2Þ
xx þ 2akf ð2Þx � gð2Þt þ agð2Þxx � 2akgð2Þx ¼ �ðDt þ aD2
x þ 2akDxÞf ð1Þ � gð1Þ; ð3:1cÞ
af ð2Þtx þ akf ð2Þ
t þ ð1þ 6k2Þf ð2Þx þ 3kf ð2Þ
xx þ f ð2Þxxx þ agð2Þtx � akgð2Þt � ð1þ 6k2Þgð2Þx þ 3kgð2Þxx � gð2Þxxx
¼ �½akDt þ aDtDx þ ð1þ 6k2ÞDx þ 3kD2x þ D3
x �f ð1Þ � gð1Þ ð3:1dÞ
and so on.
We start with gð1Þ ¼ 1, corresponding to the zero solution u ¼ 0 of Eq. (2.1), we have from Eqs. (3.1a) and (3.1b)
4f ð1Þxx þ 12kf ð1Þ
x þ ð1þ 12k2Þf ð1Þ ¼ 0: ð3:2Þ
We show that f ð1Þ can be chosen the following
f ð1Þ ¼ en1 ; ð3:3aÞ
where
n1 ¼ ðh1 þ k1Þx� aðh21 � k21Þt þ nð0Þ1 ð3:3bÞ
and
h1 þ k1 ¼ �4ðh31 þ k31Þ ð3:3cÞ
for
k ¼ �k1: ð3:3dÞ
It is readily verified that the linear dispersion relation of (2.3)
X2 ¼ K2 þ K4 ð3:4aÞ
is satisfied by K ¼ h1 þ k1;X ¼ �aðh21 � k21Þ and the phase shift is expressed by
eAmj ¼ ðhm � hjÞðkm � kjÞðhm þ hjÞðkm þ kjÞ
: ð3:4bÞ
Now we take gð1Þ ¼ en1 . It is readily shown that f ð1Þ can be chosen by
f ð1Þ ¼ a1en1 þ a2en2 ; ð3:5aÞ
where
ni ¼ ðhi þ kiÞx� aðh2i � k2i Þt þ nð0Þi ; i ¼ 1; 2; ð3:5bÞ
178 Y. Zhang, D. Chen / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 23 (2005) 175–181
a1 ¼h1 þ k2k2 � k1
; a2 ¼ � h2 þ k1k2 � k1
ð3:5cÞ
for
k ¼ �k2: ð3:5dÞ
Substitution of (3.5) into Eqs. (3.1c) and (3.1d) and solving the resulting equation, we get
f ð2Þ ¼ a12en1þn2 ; ð3:6aÞ
where
a12 ¼h1 � h2k2 � k1
; ð3:6bÞ
while all the terms higher than �2 in (3.1) can be taken to be zero and we deduce
f ¼ f2 ¼ 1þ a1en1 þ a2en2 þ a12en1þn2 : ð3:7Þ
If we choose k ¼ �k3 and gð1Þ; gð2Þ given by Eqs. (3.5) and (3.6) respectively, then Eqs. (3.1a) and (3.1b) are satisfied by
f ð1Þ ¼ b1en1 þ b2e
n2 þ b3en3 ; ð3:8aÞ
where
b1 ¼ðh1 þ k2Þðh1 þ k3Þðk1 � k2Þðk1 � k3Þ
; b2 ¼ðh2 þ k1Þðh2 þ k3Þðk2 � k1Þðk2 � k3Þ
; b3 ¼ðh3 þ k1Þðh3 þ k2Þðk3 � k1Þðk3 � k2Þ
: ð3:8bÞ
When we substitute f ð1Þ into Eqs. (3.1c) and (3.1d), then
f ð2Þ ¼ b12en1þn2 þ b13en1þn3 þ b23en2þn3 ; ð3:9aÞ
where
b12 ¼ �ðh1 � h2Þðh1 þ k3Þðh2 þ k3Þðk1 � k2Þðk1 � k3Þðk2 � k3Þ
;
b13 ¼ðh1 � h3Þðh1 þ k2Þðh3 þ k2Þðk1 � k2Þðk1 � k3Þðk2 � k3Þ
;
b23 ¼ �ðh2 � h3Þðh2 þ k1Þðh3 þ k1Þðk1 � k2Þðk1 � k3Þðk2 � k3Þ
:
ð3:9bÞ
As before, inserting Eqs. (3.8), (3.9) and (3.1), we find
f ð3Þ ¼ Ben1þn2þn3 ; ð3:10aÞ
where
B ¼ �ðh1 � h2Þðh1 � h3Þðh2 � h3Þðk1 � k2Þðk1 � k3Þðk2 � k3Þ
: ð3:10bÞ
Thus we obtain a three-soliton solution
f ¼ f3 ¼ 1þ f ð1Þ þ f ð2Þ þ f ð3Þ; ð3:11Þ
where f ð1Þ; f ð2Þ; f ð3Þ is mentioned above.
The procedure described above of solving soliton solution for the Boussinesq equation suggest to us a form of
possible N -soliton solution
f ¼ fN ¼Xlj¼0;1
expXNj¼1
lj nj
"(þ
XNm¼1;m6¼j
ð1� lmÞAjm
#þ
XN16 j6m
ljlmðBjm þ piÞ); ð3:12aÞ
Y. Zhang, D. Chen / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 23 (2005) 175–181 179
where
eAjm ¼ hj þ kmkm � kj
; eBjm ¼ hj � hmkj � km
ð3:12bÞ
and the first sum is taken over all possible combination of lj ¼ 0; 1.It is easily shown that the new representation of N-soliton solution (3.12) is equivalent to the Hirota’s N-soliton
solution formulas [9].
4. The novel multi-soliton solution of the Boussinesq equation
In the previous section, we presented a modified BTs in bilinear and drive a new representation of the N-soliton
solution for the Boussinesq equation. Due to the inherent nature of the linear differential equation with constant
coefficients, one may utilize arbitrary constant k. It is shown that the novel multi-soliton solutions can be deduced from
BTs. In what follows we explain this procedure.
To obtain novel multi-soliton solutions it is more convenient to deal with arbitrary constant k. For this purpose letus again consider Eq. (3.4), but k is satisfied with
k ¼ �k1: ð4:1Þ
From Eqs. (3.1a) and (3.1b), we have
f ð1Þ ¼ g1en1 ; ð4:2aÞ
where g1 ¼ a1t þ b1xþ c1; c1 being arbitrary parameter, corresponding coefficients as follows
a1 ¼�2aðh1 þ k1Þð1þ 12h1k1Þ
8h1 � 4k1; b1 ¼
�3ðh1 � k1Þðh1 þ k1Þ2h1 � k1
: ð4:2bÞ
Substituting (4.2) into Eqs. (3.1a) and (3.1b) gives
f ð2Þ ¼ ce2n1 ; ð4:3aÞ
where
c ¼ 1þ 12k211þ 12h21
: ð4:3bÞ
Finally, we find
f ðiÞ ¼ 0; iP 3: ð4:4Þ
Therefore the series (2.9) truncates and becomes
f ¼ 1þ g1en1 þ ce2n1 : ð4:5Þ
Now, we take
gð1Þ ! g1en1 ; gð2Þ ! ce2n1 ; gðiÞ ¼ 0 ðiP 3Þ; ð4:6Þ
where g1; c are mentioned above.
In a similar procedure, one can establish the form of multi-soliton solution as
f ¼ 1þ f ð1Þ þ f ð2Þ þ f ð3Þ; ð4:7aÞ
where
f ð1Þ ¼ ða1g21 þ a2g1 þ a3t þ a4Þen1 ; f ð2Þ ¼ ðb1g21 þ b2g1 þ b3t þ b4Þe2n1 ; f ð3Þ ¼ c1e3n1 ð4:7bÞ
and
180 Y. Zhang, D. Chen / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 23 (2005) 175–181
a1 ¼ � aðh1 þ k1Þ2
a1 þ 2ah1b1
;
a2 ¼ f�aðh1 þ 2k1Þa1 þ ð1þ 12h1k1 þ 18k21Þb1 þ ah1½�a1 þ 2aðh1 þ 2k1Þb1�gða1 þ 2ah1b1Þ
þ 2aðh1 þ k1Þ2b1ðaa1 þ 6h1b1Þ=ðb1ð1þ 12h21ÞÞ;a3 ¼ �2ðh1 þ k1Þf�3ah1ðh1 þ k1Þa1b2
1 þ aa1½�a21 þ ð2þ 3h21 þ 39h1k1Þb21�
þ 3b1½�3h1ð1þ 4h21Þb21 þ k1ð2a21 þ b2
1 � 36h21b21Þ�g=ðb1ð1þ 12h21Þða1 þ 2ab1ÞÞ;
b1 ¼ � a1ða1 � 2ak1b1Þ2aðh1 þ k1Þ2
; b3 ¼a3ða1 � 2ak1b1Þ2aðh1 þ k1Þ2
;
b2 ¼a½a3ðh1 þ k1Þ2 � 4a1h1a1b1� � a1½a21 þ 6ð�h21 þ 2h1k1 þ k21Þb
21�
6ðh1 þ k1Þ4;
b4 ¼1
12aðh1 þ k1Þ6fa1a31 þ 2aa1ð4h1 þ k1Þa21b1 þ 6½a4ðh1 þ k1Þ4a1 þ 2b1ððh1 þ k1Þ3 þ a1ð�4h21 þ k21Þa1b1Þ�
� 12að3cðh1 þ k1Þ6 þ b1½a4k1ðh1 þ k1Þ4 þ b1ð�2a2ðh1 þ k1Þ4 � 2a1h1ð�h21 þ h1k1 þ k21Þb1ÞÞ�g;
c1 ¼�a3cþ ðb4 � a2cÞa1 � 2a½a4cðh1 þ k1Þ2 þ b1ð�b4h1 � a2ch1 � 2a2ck1 � b2b1 þ a1cb1Þ�
6aðh1 þ k1Þ2:
ð4:7cÞ
We now consider the another choice for the k in (4.6) and set
k ¼ �k2: ð4:8Þ
Applying similar technique, the another of the novel multi-soliton solution for Eqs. (2.15) and (2.16) is derived as
f ¼ 1þ f ð1Þ þ f ð2Þ þ f ð3Þ; ð4:9aÞ
where
f ð1Þ ¼ ðA1g1 þ A2Þen1 þ en2 ;
f ð2Þ ¼ ðB1g1 þ B2Þen1þn2 þ B3e2n1 ;
f ð3Þ ¼ C1e2n1þn2 ;
f ðiÞ ¼ 0; iP 4
ð4:9bÞ
and
A1 ¼h1 þ k2k2 � k1
;
A2 ¼ � 2ðh1 þ k1Þ2ð12k2h1 � 12k1h2 � 1Þð1þ 12h21Þðk1 � k2Þ2
;
B1 ¼h2 � h1h2 þ k1
; B2 ¼a1 þ 2ah1b1 � 2ah2b1 � 2ak1b1
2aðh2 þ k1Þ2;
B3 ¼ �ð4acðh1 þ k1Þ2 þ 2acðh21 � k21Þ þ 4acðh1 þ k1Þk2 � A2a1 þ 2aA2k2b1 � 2aA1b21Þ
=ð2ah21 þ 8ah1k1 þ 6ak21 � 4ah1k2 � 4ak1k2Þ;
C1 ¼B2a1 þ 2a½�cðh1 þ k1Þð3h1 � 2h2 þ k1Þ þ b1ðB2h2 þ B1b1Þ�
2aðh1 þ k1Þðh1 þ 2h2 þ 3k1Þ:
ð4:9cÞ
In a similar manner, more novel multi-soliton solution analogous (4.5) and (4.7) can be studied too, but the details
will not be pursued further.
5. Conclusions and discussions
By the dependent variable transformations, a modified bilinear BTs can be obtained. Starting from the modified
bilinear BTs, a new representation of N -soliton solution and a class of novel multi-soliton solutions of the Boussinesq
Y. Zhang, D. Chen / Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 23 (2005) 175–181 181
equation have been derived. By taking the limit k2 ! k1, we find that (4.5) is just derived in (3.4), (4.9a) can be similarly
obtained through (4.7a). It means that the novel soliton solution may be deduced by limiting. It would be reasonable in
theory to continue to find novel solutions but more involved as N increases. We expect that this would be solved in the
future.
Acknowledgements
We would like to express our thanks to the referees for their valuable suggestions and timely help. This project is
supported by the National Science Foundation of China and the Special Funds for Major Specialities of Zhejiang
Province.
References
[1] Hirota R. Phys Rev Lett 1971;27:1192.
[2] Hirota R. Direct methods in soliton theory. In: Bullough RK, Caudrey PJ, editors. Topic in current physics, vol. 17. New York:
Springer; 1980. p. 157.
[3] Ablowitz MJ, Segur H. Soliton and the inverse scattering transform. Philadelphia: SIAM; 1981.
[4] Hirota R, Satsuma J. Progr Theor Phys Suppl 1976;59:64.
[5] Deng SF, Chen DY. J Phys Soc Jpn 2001;70:3174.
[6] Chen DY, Zhang DJ, Deng SF. J Phys Soc Jpn 2002;71:658.
[7] Zhang Y, Deng SF, Chen DY. J Phys Soc Jpn 2003;72:763.
[8] Hirota R. Progr Theor Phys Suppl 1974;52:1498.
[9] Hirota R, Satsuma J. Progr Theor Phys 1977;57:797.
[10] Satsuma J, Kaup DJ. J Phys Soc Jpn 1978;43:692.
[11] Hirota R, Satsuma J. J Phys Soc Jpn 1978;45:1741.
[12] Zhang Y, Chen DY. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 2004;20:343.
[13] Zakharov VE. Sov Phys JETP 1974;38:108.
[14] Boussinesq J. J Math Pure Appl 1872;17:55.
[15] Toda M, Wadati M. J Phys Soc Jpn 1973;34:18.
[16] Wadati M. Progr Theor Phys Suppl 1976;59:36.
[17] Nimmo JJC, Freeman NC. Phys Lett 1983;95A:4.