4
Today, February 25th 2.008 Design & Manufacturing HW#2 due before the class, #3 out on II the web after the class. Math Formulae, handout Spring 2004 Lab groups fixed, and thank you. group report!!! Metal Cutting I Metal cutting demo Cutting physics 2.008-spring-2004 S.Kim 1 2 2.008-spring-2004 S.Kim i 3 i 4 Material removal processes Cost: igh sun ' & ' & 2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim A lathe of pre WWII 2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim Expensive $100 - $10,000 Quality: Very h Flexibility: Any shape under the Rate: Slow i ji 5 i 6 Machined Surface µ inch 1000 ium 500 125 Fine 32 Very fine 16 8 2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim Kalpak an Surface roughness by machining 2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim Rough Med Avg. Better than Avg. 63 Extremely fine 1

A lathe of pre WWII Material removal processes · PDF fileLab groups fixed, and thank you. group report!!! Metal Cutting I ... Orthogonal cutting in a lathe Rake angle T o 2.008-spr

  • Upload
    ledieu

  • View
    215

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A lathe of pre WWII Material removal processes · PDF fileLab groups fixed, and thank you. group report!!! Metal Cutting I ... Orthogonal cutting in a lathe Rake angle T o 2.008-spr

Today, February 25th 2.008 Design & Manufacturing

� HW#2 due before the class, #3 out on II the web after the class. � Math Formulae, handoutSpring 2004

� Lab groups fixed, and thank you. � group report!!!

Metal Cutting I � Metal cutting demo � Cutting physics

2.008-spring-2004 S.Kim 1

22.008-spring-2004 S.Kim

i 3 i 4

Material removal processes

� Cost: �

� igh �

sun �

'

&

'

&

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

A lathe of pre WWII

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Expensive $100 -$10,000

Quality: Very h

Flexibility: Any shape under the

Rate: Slow

i ji 5 i 6

Machined Surface

µ inch

1000 ium 500

125

Fine 32 Very fine 16

8

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim Kalpak an

Surface roughness by machining

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Rough MedAvg.Better than Avg. 63

Extremely fine

1

Page 2: A lathe of pre WWII Material removal processes · PDF fileLab groups fixed, and thank you. group report!!! Metal Cutting I ... Orthogonal cutting in a lathe Rake angle T o 2.008-spr

ss VF ⋅:shearingfor Power

cc VF ⋅:input

cVF ⋅:friction viadissipatedPower

VtwVFu

o

sss ⋅⋅

⋅=:shearingfor energy Specific

VtwVFuo

cf ⋅⋅

⋅=:frictionfor energy Specific

VtwVF

VtwVFuu

o

ss

o

cfs ⋅⋅

⋅+

⋅⋅⋅

=+:energyspecificTotal

i 7

Cutting processes

� Product quality: surface, tolerance � Productivity: MRR , Tool wear

� Physics of cutting � Mechanics � Force, power

� Tool materials � i

i 8

Cutting Tools

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Why do we study cutting physics?

Des gn for manufacturing

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

i 9

Cutting process modeling

� What are the forces involved? �

� How do the above relate to power

i 10

Orthogonal cutting in a lathe

Rake angle

To

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Methods: Modeling and Experiments

Key issues How does cutting work?

What affect does material properties have?

requirements, MRR, wear, surface?

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Shear angle

: depth of cut

Shear plane

Assume a hollow shaft

i 11

Cutting tool and workpiece..

Power

i 12

Varying rake angle α:

- α α = 0

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Primary shear zone

Secondary shear zone

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

2

Page 3: A lathe of pre WWII Material removal processes · PDF fileLab groups fixed, and thank you. group report!!! Metal Cutting I ... Orthogonal cutting in a lathe Rake angle T o 2.008-spr

-i 13

Basic cutting geometry

( ) ( )cos

φsin r

ct ot

V cV

− ===

ctcVo ⋅

r <1

V

Vc

tcto

Continuity

to

i 14

Velocity diagram in cutting zone

( ) ( ) ( )φsin cV

αcos sV

cos V

== −

( ) ( )cos

φsin r

ct ot

V cV

− ===

( ) ( )cos

φVsin cV

− =

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

We will use the orthogonal model

Shear angle

α φ

t V = ⋅

Cutting ratio:

: chip thickness : depth of cut

2.008-spr ng 2004 S.Kim

α φ

α φ

α φ

Law of sines

i 15

Forces and power

� FBD at the tool-workpiece contact � What are the forces involved

� Thrust force, Ft � Cutting force, Fc � Resultant force, R � Friction force, F � Normal Force, N � Shear Force, Fs, Fn

i 16

ian

Fc

α

φ

R

Ft

Fc

Fn

Fs

F

N α

β

Ft β−α

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim 2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

E. Merchant’s cutting diagram

Source: Kalpajk

i 17

( ) ( ) α )βRcos(φφsintFφcoscFsF =⋅−⋅=

( ) ( )φcostFφsincFnF ⋅+⋅=

( )βF ⋅=

( )βN ⋅= ( )βtanµ =

β =

FBD of Forces

( ) ( )αtantFcF

αtancFtF

N F

µ ⋅+

==

( )α-βsinRFt ⋅=

( )α-βcosRFc ⋅=

i 18

� What does this mean: �

� Merchantto minimize cutting force or max. shear stress

22 45 βαφ = o

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

− +

sin R cos R

Angle Friction

2 µ 0.5 :Typcially < <

⋅ −

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Analysis of shear strain

Low shear angle = large shear strain ’s assumption: Shear angle adjusts

Can derive: − +

3

Page 4: A lathe of pre WWII Material removal processes · PDF fileLab groups fixed, and thank you. group report!!! Metal Cutting I ... Orthogonal cutting in a lathe Rake angle T o 2.008-spr

i 19

Shear angle

( ) α ­βcosRFc

( ) ( ) α)βRcos(φφsintFφcoscFsF =⋅=

α)βcos(φ/α)cos(βFscF −=

As.σssF =

α)βcos(φ/α)cos(βφsin A

σcF s −=

0dFc/dφ =

2245 βαφ = o

i 20

� ion increases �

� ion via shear �

2 β

2 α

45φ o

−+=

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

⋅ =

− + ⋅ −

− +

strength) shear plane. shear of (area

− +

− +

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Things to think about

As rake angle decreases or frictShear angle decreases Chip becomes thicker Thicker chip = more energy dissipatMore shear = more heat generation Temperature increase!!!

i 21

Power

ss VF ⋅

VF c ⋅

c ⋅

V VF u

o

ss s ⋅ ⋅

⋅ =

Vu

o

c f ⋅ ⋅

⋅ =

V VF

Vuu

o

ss

o

c fs ⋅ ⋅

⋅ +

⋅ ⋅ ⋅

=+

i ji 22

imate)

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

: shearing for Power

: input Power

V F : friction via dissipated Power

t w : shearing for energy Specific

t w V F : friction for energy Specific

t w t w V F : energy specific Total

MRR

=> shearing + friction

Experimantal data 2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim Kalpak an

Specific energy (rough est

i 23

Example � i�

� ω � ifi i i� 3

� l

2.0

1.01.25

i ji 24

Cutting zone pictures BUE

serrated di

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim

Consider the turning with a rod, from 1.25 nch diameter to 1.0. to; depth of cut, 0.005 inch f; feed rate, 0.025 inch/rev

; spindle speed, 1000 rpm uf;spec c energy for fr ct on us;specific energy for shear, 0.35 hp min/in1 hp = 550 ft. bf/s

How many passes? Tools speed? Time to make this part? V c max? Max power needed? Initial cutting force?

2.008-spr ng-2004 S.Kim Kalpak an

continuous secondary shear

scontinuous

4