22
A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig www.mis.mpg.de Bath Institute for Complex Systems Multi-scale problems: Modelling, analysis and applications 12th – 14th September 2005

A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig Bath Institute for Complex Systems

  • View
    217

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

A hierarchy of theoriesfor thin elastic bodies

Stefan Müller

MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig

www.mis.mpg.de

Bath Institute for Complex SystemsMulti-scale problems:

Modelling, analysis and applications12th – 14th September 2005

Page 2: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Nonlinear elasticity 3d 2dMajor question since the beginning of elasticity theory

Why ?• 2d simpler to understand, visualize• Important in engineering and biology• Qualitatively new behaviour: crumpling, collapse• Subtle influence of geometry (large rotations)• Very non-scalar behaviour

`Zoo of theories´

First rigorous results:LeDret-Raoult (´93-´96) (membrane theory, -convergence) Acerbi-Buttazzo-Percivale (´91) (rods, -convergence) Mielke (´88) (rods, centre manifolds)

Page 3: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Beyond membranes

Key point: Low energy close to rotation

Classical result

Need quantitative version

Page 4: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Rigidity estimate/ Nonlinear Korn

Thm. (Friesecke, James, M.)

Remarks 1. F. John (1961) u BiLip, dist (u, SO(n)) < Birth of BMO2. Y.G. Reshetnyak Almost conformal maps: weak implies strong3. Linearization Korn´s inequality4. Scaling is optimal (and this is crucial)5. Ok for Lp, 1 < p <

L2 distance from a point L2 distance from a set

Page 5: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Rigidity estimate – an application

Thm. (DalMaso-Negri-Percivale) 3d nonlinear elasticity 3d geom. linear elasticity

L2 distance from a point L2 distance from a set

Gives rigorous status to singular solutions in linear elasticity

Question: For which sets besides SO(n) does such an estimatehold ? Faraco-Zhong (quasiconformal), Chaudhuri-M. (2 wells), DeLellis-Szekelyhidi (abstract version)

Page 6: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Idea of proof

1. Four-line proof for(Reshetnyak, Kinderlehrer)

2. First part of the real proof: perturb this argumentThis yields (interior) bound by , not

Page 7: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Proof of rigidity estimate I

Step 0: Wlog `truncation of gradients´ (Liu, Ziemer, Evans-Gariepy)

Step1: Let

Compute

Take divergence

Page 8: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Proof of rigidity estimate II

Step 2: We know

Linearize at F = Id

Set

Korn interior estimate with optimal scaling

Step 3: Estimate up to the boundary. a) Cover by cubes with boundary distance sizeb) Weighted Poincaré inequality (`Hardy ineq.´)

Page 9: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

3d nonlinear elasticity

Page 10: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

3d 2d

Rem. Same for shells (FJM + M.G. Mora)

Page 11: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Gamma-convergence (De Giorgi)

Page 12: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

The limit functional (Kirchhoff 1850)

Geometrically nonlinear, Stress-strain relation linear (only matters)

isometry

„bending energy“

curvature

Page 13: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Idea of proof

One key point: compactness

1. Unscale to S x (0,h), divide into cubes of size h

2. Apply rigidity estimate to each cube: good approximation of deformation gradient by rotation

3. Apply rigidity estimate to union of two neighbouring cubes: difference quotient estimate compactness, higher differentiability of the limit

Page 14: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Different scaling limits

(Modulo rigid motions)

in-plane displacement out-of plane displacement

Given such that

find , , for which

Page 15: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

A hierarchy of theories(natural boundary conditions)

For > 2 assume that force points in a single direction(which can be assumed normal to the plate) andhas zero moment

Page 16: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

A hierarchy of theories(clamped boundary conditions,

normal load)

Page 17: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Unified limit for > 2 (natural bc)

Page 18: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Constrained theory for 2 < < 4

One crucial ingredient for upper bound:

Rem. Hartmann-Nirenberg, Pogorelov, Vodopyanov-Goldstein

Page 19: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

A wide field

The range is a no man‘s landwhere interesting things happenTwo signposts:

= 1: Complex blistering patterns in thin films with Dirichlet boundary conditions Scaling known/ Gamma-limit open (depends on bdry cond. ?) BenBelgacem-Conti-DeSimone-M., Jin-Sternberg, Hornung

= 5/3: Crumpling of paper ? T. Witten et al., Pomeau, Ben Amar, Audoly, Mahadevan et al., Sharon et al., Venkataramani, Conti-Maggi, ...

More general: reduced theories which capturesystematically both membrane and bending effects

Page 20: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Beyond minimizers (2d 1d)

Page 21: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Beyond minimizers (2d 1d)

A. Mielke, Centre manifolds

Page 22: A hierarchy of theories for thin elastic bodies Stefan Müller MPI for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig  Bath Institute for Complex Systems

Conclusions

Rigidity estimate/ Nonlinear Korn inequalitySmall energy Close to rigid motion

Beyond minimizers …

Reduction 3d to 2d:Key point is geometry/ understanding (large) rotations(F. John) Hierarchy of limiting theories ordered by scaling of the energy

Interesting and largely unexplored scaling regimeswhere different limiting theories interact