34
A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods Peter Shawhan Caltech / LIGO LIGO Seminar March 30, 2006 LIGO-G060168-00- Z

A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

  • Upload
    anise

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods. Peter Shawhan Caltech / LIGO LIGO Seminar March 30, 2006. LIGO-G060168-00-Z. Itinerary. ► Preparing for the trip: Brief review of gravitational waves and detectors - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals

and Detection Methods

Peter ShawhanCaltech / LIGO

LIGO SeminarMarch 30, 2006

LIGO-G060168-00-Z

Page 2: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z2

Itinerary

► Preparing for the trip:Brief review of gravitational waves and detectors

► Mapping the territory:An overview of gravitational wave signals

► Driving directions:Signal detection methods

► Road hazards:Data analysis challenges

► The road ahead

Page 3: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z3

Gravitational Waves

Emitted by a massive object, or group of objects, whose shapeor orientation changes rapidly with time

Changes the geometry of space in a time-varying way

Strength and polarization depend on direction relative to source

“Plus” polarization “Cross” polarization Circular polarization

Can be a linear combination of polarization components

Page 4: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z4

Laser Interferometers

Measure difference in arm lengths to a fraction of a wavelength

Beam splitter

Mirror

Mirror

Photodetector

Laser

Responds to one polarization component

Page 5: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z5

Antenna Pattern of aLaser Interferometer

Directional sensitivity depends on polarization of waves

“” polarization “” polarization RMS sensitivity

A broad antenna pattern More like a microphone than a telescope

Page 6: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z6

LIGO Sensitivity,Science Runs S1 through S5

Page 7: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z7

Itinerary

► Preparing for the trip:Brief review of gravitational waves and detectors

► Mapping the territory:An overview of gravitational wave signals

► Driving directions:Signal detection methods

► Road hazards:Data analysis challenges

► The road ahead

Page 8: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z8

The Gravitational WaveSignal Tableau

Waveform known

Waveform unknown

Short duration Long duration

Low-mass inspiral

High-mass inspiral

Binary merger

h(t)

Page 9: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z9

: “lapse function” used in simulation

Recent Progress in Simulating Binary Mergers

Frans Pretorius, PRL 95, 121101 (2005)

Succeeded in evolving system through orbit, merger, and ringdown

Movies at http://astrogravs.gsfc.nasa.gov/conf/numrel2005/

4 : second time derivative of GW strain

Page 10: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z10

Recent Progress in Simulating Binary Mergers

Campanelli, Lousto, Marronetti, & Zlochower, PRL 96, 111101 (2006)

Different numerical techniques compared to Pretorius

Movie at http://www.aip.org/mgr/png/images/bhmergermovie.mpg

Page 11: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z11

Recent Progress in Simulating Binary Mergers

Baker, Centrella, Choi, Koppitz, & van Meter, PRL 96, 111102 (2006)

Similar approach and results to Campanelli et al.

Page 12: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z12

The Gravitational WaveSignal Tableau

Waveform known

Waveform unknown

Short duration Long duration

Low-mass inspiral

High-mass inspiral

Binary merger

NS / BH ringdown

Stellar core collapse

Page 13: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z13

Gravitational Wave Emissionfrom Stellar Core Collapse

Gravitational wave emission requires an aspherical collapse

In-falling material can drive oscillation modes of core

Centrifugal forces from rotation can lead to a pole-equator difference

Rotational instability can break axisymmetry spontaneously

Page 14: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z14

Axisymmetric Simulations ofStellar Core Collapse

Zwerger and Müller, Astron. Astrophys. 320, 209 (1997)

Ott, Burrows, Livne, and Walder, ApJ 600, 834 (2004)

Page 15: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z15

Core Oscillations & Acoustic Wavesin Stellar Core Collapse

Burrows, Livne, Dessart, Ott, and Murphy, ApJ 640, 878 (2006)

Also: http://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=105798&org=NSF

Axisymmetric simulation with non-rotating progenitor

Observe that in-falling material eventually drives oscillations of the core

Acoustic waves carry energy to outer mantle, driving explosion

Page 16: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z16

Gravitational Waves fromOtt et al. Simulation

PowerPoint slides and movies posted athttp://zenith.as.arizona.edu/~burrows/briley/

Suggests that total powerradiated in gravitationalwaves can be huge!

Page 17: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z17

Gravitational Waves fromBurrows et al. Simulation

Page 18: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z18

The Gravitational WaveSignal Tableau

Waveform known

Waveform unknown

Short duration Long duration

Low-mass inspiral

Asymmetric spinning NS

High-mass inspiral

Binary merger

NS / BH ringdown

Cosmic string cusp / kink

Stellar core collapse

Cosmological stochastic

background

Many overlapping

signals

Rotational instability

??? ??? ???

Page 19: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z19

Itinerary

► Preparing for the trip:Brief review of gravitational waves and detectors

► Mapping the territory:An overview of gravitational wave signals

► Driving directions:Signal detection methods

► Road hazards:Data analysis challenges

► The road ahead

Page 20: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z20

Signal Detection Methods

Waveform known

Waveform unknown

Short duration Long duration

Low-mass inspiral

Asymmetric spinning NS

High-mass inspiral

NS / BH ringdown

Cosmic string cusp / kink

Stellar core collapse

Cosmological stochastic

background

Many overlapping

signals

Rotational instability

??? ??? ???

Matched filtering

Binary merger

Page 21: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z21

Illustration of Matched Filtering

Page 22: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z22

Optimal Matched Filteringfor Short Signals

Look for maxima of |z(t)| abovesome threshold trigger

dfefS

fhfstz tfi

n

2

0

*

)(

)(~

)(~4)(

Noise power spectral density

TemplateData

Use a bank of templates to coverparameter space of target signals

Inspirals with

M < m1,m2 < 3 MMin. match = 0.97

Page 23: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z23

Signal Detection Methods

Waveform known

Waveform unknown

Short duration Long duration

Low-mass inspiral

Asymmetric spinning NS

High-mass inspiral

NS / BH ringdown

Cosmic string cusp / kink

Stellar core collapse

Cosmological stochastic

background

Many overlapping

signals

Rotational instability

??? ??? ???

Matched filtering

Semi-coherent demodulation

Demodulation

Approx. filtering

Binary merger

Page 24: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z24

Demodulation / Matched Filtering for Continuous-Wave Signals

Even a “continuous” gravitational wave is not received as a monochromatic signal

Doppler shift due to Earth’s orbit and rotation

Antenna pattern depends on sidereal time of day

Intrinsic frequency of source may be changing

Source in binary system exhibits additional Doppler shift

Demodulation depends sensitively on source parameters

Large-parameter-space searches are limited by computational power

Time

Fre

quen

cy

Time

Semi-coherent methods use less CPU

Stack-slide, Hough transform,etc.

Can be used as part of ahierarchical search

Page 25: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z25

Signal Detection Methods

Waveform known

Waveform unknown

Short duration Long duration

Low-mass inspiral

Asymmetric spinning NS

High-mass inspiral

NS / BH ringdown

Cosmic string cusp / kink

Stellar core collapse

Cosmological stochastic

background

Many overlapping

signals

Rotational instability

??? ??? ???

Matched filtering

Excess power

Semi-coherent demodulation

Demodulation

Approx. filtering

Binary merger

Page 26: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z26

“Excess Power” Search Methods

Decompose data stream intotime-frequency pixels

Fourier components, wavelets,“Q transform”, etc.

Normalize relative to noiseas a function of frequency

Look for “hot” pixelsor clusters of pixels

Can use multiple (t,f ) pixel resolutions

Fre

quen

cy

Time

Page 27: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z27

Signal Detection Methods

Waveform known

Waveform unknown

Short duration Long duration

Low-mass inspiral

Asymmetric spinning NS

High-mass inspiral

NS / BH ringdown

Cosmic string cusp / kink

Stellar core collapse

Cosmological stochastic

background

Many overlapping

signals

Rotational instability

??? ??? ???

Matched filtering

Excess power

Semi-coherent demodulation

Cross-correlation

Demodulation

Approx. filtering

Binary merger

Page 28: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z28

Cross-Correlation Methods

Look for same signal buried in two data streams

Integrate over a time interval comparable to the target signal

Time

H2

L1

Simulated signalinjected here

Consistent

Inconsistent

Extensions to three or more detector sites being worked on

Page 29: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z29

Signal Detection Methods

Waveform known

Waveform unknown

Short duration Long duration

Low-mass inspiral

Asymmetric spinning NS

High-mass inspiral

NS / BH ringdown

Cosmic string cusp / kink

Stellar core collapse

Cosmological stochastic

background

Many overlapping

signals

Rotational instability

??? ??? ???

Matched filtering

Excess power

Time-freq track

Semi-coherent demodulation

Cross-correlation

Demodulation

Approx. filtering

Binary merger

Page 30: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z30

Itinerary

► Preparing for the trip:Brief review of gravitational waves and detectors

► Mapping the territory:An overview of gravitational wave signals

► Driving directions:Signal detection methods

► Road hazards:Data analysis challenges

► The road ahead

Page 31: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z31

Variable Data Quality

Various environmental and instrumental conditions catalogued;can study relevance using time-shifted coincident triggers

Example from S4 all-sky burst search:Minimal data quality cuts Additional data quality cutsRequire locked interferometers Avoid high seismic noise, wind, jet

Omit hardware injections Avoid calibration line drop-outsAvoid times of ADC overflows Avoid times of “dips” in stored light

Omit last 30 sec of each lock

Net loss of observation time:

5.6%

Page 32: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z32

Non-Stationary Noise / Glitches

For inspirals: chi-squared testand other consistency tests

Auxiliary-channel vetoes

Most important: require consistent signals in multiple detectors!

Time

Fre

quen

cy

GWchannel

Beamsplitterpick-off

Page 33: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z33

Itinerary

► Preparing for the trip:Brief review of gravitational waves and detectors

► Mapping the territory:An overview of gravitational wave signals

► Driving directions:Signal detection methods

► Road hazards:Data analysis challenges

► The road ahead

Page 34: A Grand Tour of Gravitational Wave Signals and Detection Methods

LIGO-G060168-00-Z34

Are We There Yet?

Gravitational wave detectors are in an exploration phase

Need to be open to all possible signals, known and unknown

General methods exist to search for all types of signals

Different methods best for different types

The challenge is to get the most out of our data

Current implementations vary in maturity level

Implementation details are often the tricky part