Upload
gerald-marshall
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A GP for Me -A GPSC Initiative 2015 Quality Forum
Dr. Brenda Hefford- Executive Director, Practice Support and Quality, Doctors of BCShana Ooms, Director, Primary Health Care,
Ministry of Health
2
Benefits of a continuous doctor – patient relationship
• Improved Patient Heath
• Patients who have access to a regular primary care provider or family doctor are healthier – they don’t get sick, go to emergency rooms or end up in hospital as often
• Improved Health System
• Family doctors are able to oversee and coordinate a patient’s care across the health system and can help to reduce overall costs
• Positive Economic Impact
• Research in BC shows it costs less to look after patients who have regular access to primary care
3
Problem/Issue: There are many people in BC who do not have a family doctor
Number of People in BC Without a Family Doctor
Number of People in BC Looking for a Family Doctor
2010 (Pop approx. 4,456,900)
13.8 per cent (approximately 615,000)
3.96 per cent (approx. 176,000)
2013(Pop approx. 4,582,000)
15.5 percent (approx. 710,000)
4.57 per cent (approx. 209,000)
The number of people without a family doctor is rising
2003 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 201310.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
14.1% 14.3%15.1%
15.6%15.1% 15.2% 15.3%
14.9%15.5%
10.6% 10.9%
11.9%
13.2% 13.2%
14.3%13.9% 14.0%
15.5%
Percentage of Population without a Regular Medical Doctor
Canada British Columbia
Data Source: Statistics Canada, CANSIM Table 105-0501
Data is only available up to 2013 when A GP for Me started so do not have data to see any impact.
Similar issues exist across Canada
Percentage of Population without a Regular Medical Doctor
6
Attachment Initiative: Three prototype communities
7
A province-wide initiative funded jointly by Doctors of BC and the Government of BC to strengthen the primary care system
8
Goals of A GP for Me
• Enable patients who want a family physician to find one
• Strengthen and support the family doctor - patient continuous relationship, including better support for vulnerable patients
• Increase capacity of the primary health care system
9
Multi-pronged approach
1. Physician practice level incentive fees
2. Community patient attachment strategies through Divisions of Family Practice
3. Integration, alignment, and leveraging of existing health authority, ministry, joint clinical committees, and partner initiatives, programs and policies
4. Patient and public engagement and education
Practice Level - attachment incentives
Four new family physician fees.The fees are for:
• Attaching unattached patients with complex health needs;
• Managing the care of frail patients;
• Providing patient care over the telephone for all patients;
• Conducting conferences with other health care providers for all patients.
10
11
Community supports:Local divisions of family practice
$40 million over three years to:
• Engage and assess: community and patient needs, local family doctor needs, strengths and gaps in local primary care resources
• Develop and implement community plans for improving local primary care capacity, including finding doctors for patients who want one
Practice level results to date*
3,101 family physicians have ‘signed-up’ to participate in A GP for Me locally via their Division of Family Practice.
• 75% of full service family physicians.
More than 415,000 patients have received attachment related services
$31.0 million has been paid for these services
*Based on services from April 1, 2013 to December 31, 2014, paid to December 31, 2014
13
Practice level incentives have enabled family physicians to:
Attach 54,600 unattached patients with complex health needs (to over 1,900 family physicians)
Provide telephone care to 326,000 patients (by 3,300 family physicians)
Provide enhanced care to 17,600 frail patients (by more than 1,640 family physicians)
Hold conferences with other health care providers about the shared care of 64,000 patients (by over 2,550 family physicians)
*Based on services from April 1, 2013 to Dec 31, 2014, paid to Dec 31, 2014
Practice level results to date*
Community level results to date
Not Interested Assessment and Planning Phase
Implementation Phase Sustainability Phase 0
5
10
15
20
25
1
10
20
3
Divisions' Participation in Attachment - Jan 2015
Planning and Assessment Implementation Total
Expenditure as ofDecember 2014 $10,746,231 $7,832,000 $18,578,231
Divisions Progress from Assessment & Planning to Implementing
15
Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14 Apr-14May-14 Jun-14 Jul-14 Aug-14 Sep-14 Oct-14 Nov-14 Dec-14 Jan-150
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1
6
9
12
1718 18 18
1920 20
2122
21 21
1615
14
12
10
11 1
33
7 7 12 1315
18 20
Divisions in Assessment & Planning Divisions Implementing Local Solutions
16
Key Community Strategies
• Physician retention and recruitment
• Practice Efficiency and Clinical Improvement Supports
• Inter-professional team based care
• Public Education and Health Promotion
• Attachment mechanism
Challenges and lessons
• Importance of relationships and collaboration
•Balancing improving access to care with providing improved quality of care
•Complexity: multiple factors influencing primary care capacity and access
•Strength of community engagement and planning
•Challenge of provincial expectations and timelines
17
Challenges and lessons
• Benefits of assessment and planning in building relationships, increasing understanding of local issues, and being more targeted and customized in solutions
• Existing payment models in supporting team based care models
• Challenge of evaluation
18
19
Section Title goes hereSection 3
An initiative of the GPSC, funded by Doctors of BC and the Government of BC
Thank you!