A GENERAL INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS READING LIST

FOR PHD COMPREHENSIVE EXAMS

1. The Structure of the PhD Comprehensive Examination in International Relations

The doctoral written comprehensive examination in International Relations consists of a three-part, three-hour examination. Each part is of equal weight, and the candidate will answer one question from each part (each part will have a choice of questions). The three parts are related to the structure of courses offered at the graduate level in the Department, and in the comprehensive examination reading list, as follows:

Part One is on general International Politics and International Relations Theory. Part Two will draw on one of Foreign Policy or Strategic Studies. Part Three will focus more specifically on the candidate’s broad area of dissertation research.

It is not intended that students should read everything on the list. The candidate should consult with the supervisor for more specific guidance concerning the comprehensive reading list.

2. The Reading List

This list is intended to give some suggestions for students preparing for their doctoral comprehensive exams in International Relations.The readings are divided into four sections, reflecting our three areas in our field description, and one general area. The general section consists of general surveys, anthologies, and methodological debates which should be looked at by all students, if only to extract the more relevant particular material that can complement the readings in the three remaining areas. Readers should pay particular attention to edited volumes in the general and the anthology sections above all. The contents of these will overlap extensively with particular sections below. Other edited volumes in specific sections are more focused. In addition, however, users should bear in mind that these various categories and divisions need not be mutually exclusive, so a candidate may benefit from looking over the entire list for potential readings, not just the most apparently pertinent sections. This is particularly the case with the Anthologies listed in the General section.

Users should also note the journals listed here as well, and should survey them. In some

cases, the anthologies and other edited volumes will overlap with the journals. Journals such as International Organization, International Journal, World Politics and International Studies Quarterly should be scanned for their useful general coverage. Other journals that should be examined include: International Security; Millenium; Review of International Studies; European Journal of International Relations; Review of International Political Economy. International Studies Review (formerly Mershon International Studies Review). The International Studies Review in particular provides extensive bibliographic surveys as well as shorter reviews and notes. Others will be useful on a more specialized basis, but some journals may also have very helpful review sections as well. Columbia International Affairs Online (www.ciaonet.org) provides access to a large number of journals, research centers, working papers and the like. It may be consulted to provide more specific material. Two general volumes may also be of value in scanning the discipline as a whole: Martin Griffiths, Fifty Key Thinkers in International Relations. London: Routledge, 1999. Iver B. Neumann and Ole Waever (eds.), The Future of International Relations: Masters in the

Making. London: Routledge, 1997. These two provide essays giving an overview and some critical assessment of various theorists, lists of their works, and other bibliographic information as well.

2

SECTION I: GENERAL READINGS

A. Histories, Surveys, Summaries and General Debates

Buzan, Barry et. al. “What is the Polity: A Roundtable.” International Studies Review, Spring

2000, Vol. 2, Issue 1: 3-32. Dougherty, J.E., and R.I. Pfaltzgraff, Contending Theories of International Relations: A

Comprehensive Survey. New York: Harper and Row, 1981 or latest edition. Greenstein, F.I., and N.W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 8: International

Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975. Holsti, J., Kalevi. Taming the Sovereigns: Institutional Change in International Politics.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 2004. Lapid, Yosef, “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist

Era,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 33 (1989). Olson, W.C., and A.J.R. Groom, International Relations Then and Now, London: Harper Collins,

1991. Sullivan, Michael P., Theories of International Relations: Transition versus Persistence. New

York: Palgrave Macmillan,2002. Wight, Martin, International Theory: The Three Traditions, Gabriele Wight and Brian Porter, Eds.

New York: Holmes & Meier, 1992.

B. Anthologies Art, R. J., and R. Jervis (eds.), International Politics: Anarchy, Force, Political Economy and

Decision Making. Boston: Little, Brown, 1985. (latest). Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith (eds.), International Relations Theory Today.University Park, Penn:

Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995. Butterfield, Herbert, and Martin Wight. Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of

International Relations, London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1966. Doyle, Michael C., and G. John Ikenberry (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory.

Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1997. Elman, Colin and Miriam Fendius Elman. eds., Progress in International Relations Theory.

Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2003. Fettweis, J., Christopher. “Evaluating IR’s Crystal Balls: How Predictions of the Future Have

Withstood Fourteen Years of Unipolarity.” International Studies Review. Vol. 6. Issue 1, Spring 2004: 79-105.

Haglund, D.G., & M.K. Hawes (eds.), World Politics: Power, Interdependence and Dependence.

Toronto: Harcourt Brace, 1990. Hoffmann, Stanley, The State of War. New York: Praeger, 1965.

3

Hopmann, Terrence. “Adapting International Relations Theory to the End of the Cold War.” Journal of Cold War Studies. Vol. 5, Issue 3, Summer 2003: 96-101.

International Organization Special Issue: Vol. 52, No. 4, Autumn 1998: Exploration and

Contestation in the Study of World Politics. Kegley, Charles W. (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the

Neoliberal Challenge. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995. Matthews, R.O., A.G. Rubinoff and J.G. Stein (eds.), International Conflict and Conflict

Management. Scarborough: Prentice-Hall of Canada, 1984 or latest. Rosenau, J.N., (ed.), International Politics and Foreign Policy. New York: The Free Press. 1961

and 1969. There are substantial differences between the two editions. Rosenau, J.N., and Ernst-Otto Czempiel (eds.), Governance without government: order and

change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Rothstein, Robert L. (ed), The Evolution of Theory in International Relations. Columbia:

University of South Carolina Press, 1991. Russett, Bruce M. (ed.), Peace, War and Numbers. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1972. Smith, Steve, Ken Booth and Marysia Zalewski (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and

Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.

C. Methods and Methodological Debates

Science, Scientific Method, Quantitative and Qualitative Methods, and Debates

Ashley, Richard K, “The Poverty of Neorealism,” International Organization, Vol. 38, No. 2 (Spring 1984), pp. 225-286.

Der Derian, James, and Michael J. Shapiro, International/Intertextual Relations Lexington: Lexington Books, 1989.

Diesing, Paul, Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine Atherton, 1971.

Eckstein, Harry, “Case Study and Theory in Political Science,” in Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7: Strategies of Inquiry, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

Greenstein, F.I., and N.W. Polsby (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 7: Strategies of Inquiry. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

Hollis, Martin, and Steven Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford:

Clarendon Press, 1990. Kaplan, A., The Conduct of Inquiry: Methodology for Behavioral Science. New York: Chandler,

1964. Keohane, Robert O., “ International Institutions: Two Approaches,” International Studies

Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4 (December 1988), pp. 379-396.

4

King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane and Sydney Verba, Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. See also Timothy McKeown, “Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview,” International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 1 (Winter 1999).

Knorr, Klaus, and J.N. Rosenau (eds.), Contending Approaches to International Politics.

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1969.

Kuhn, T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.

Lakatos, I., and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970. Particularly I. Lakatos, "Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes."

Vasquez, John, “The Post-Positivist Debate: Reconstructing Scientific Enquiry and International Relations Theory after Enlightenment’s Fall,” in Ken Booth and Steve Smith (eds.), International Relations Theory Today, University Park, Penn.: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.

Walker, R.B.J., “ History and Structure in the Theory of International Relations,” in David G. Haglund and Michael K. Hawes (eds.), World Politics: Power, Interdependence and Independence Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Canada, 1990, pp. 482-505.

Rational Action and its Critics

Barry, Brian, and R. Hardin (eds.), Rational Man and Irrational Society? Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982.

Hardin, Russell, Collective Action. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.

Lake, David A., and Robert Powell (eds.), Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999.

Olson, Mancur, The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1971.

Oye, Kenneth, (ed.), Cooperation Under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986. (This was also a special issue of World Politics.)

Schelling, Thomas C. The Strategy of Conflict, Oxford: Oxford Universioty Press, 1960. Simon, Herbert, “Human Nature in Politics,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 79, No. 2,

June 1985. Vaughan, Diane, The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture and Deviance at

NASA. Chicago:L University of Chicago Press.

Walt, Stephen M., “Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational Choice and Security Studies,” International Security, Vol. 23, No. 4 (Spring 1999), and subsequent debate, Fall 1999.

SECTION II: INTERNATIONAL POLITICS AND THEORY

A. Major Theoretical Schools

5

Realism Aron, Raymond, Peace and War. Garden City: Doubleday, 1966. Buzan, Barry, C. Jones and R. Little, The Logic of Anarchy. New York: Columbia University

Press, 1993. Campbell, Craig, Glimmer of a New Leviathan: Total War in the Realism of Niebuhr,

Morgenthau, and Waltz New York: Columbia University Press, 2003. Carr, E.H., The Twenty Years Crisis. New York: Harper and Row, 1964. Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

1981. See also Rogowski's review in International Organization. Autumn 1983. Grieco, Joseph, “Realist International Theory and the Study of World Politics,” in Michael W.

Doyle and G. John Ikenberry (eds.), New Thinking in International Relations Theory. Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1997.

“Interview with Ken Waltz,” Review of International Studies, Vol. 24 (1998). Keohane, R.O. (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986. Kissinger, Henry A., A World Restored: The Politics of Conservatism in a Revolutionary Age,

New York: Grossett & Dunlop, 1964. Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press,

1999. Morgenthau, Hans J. Scientific Man versus Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press,

1946. Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York:

Alfred A. Knopf, various editions. Tucker, Robert W. The Inequality of Nations. New York: Basic Books, 1977. Waltz, Kenneth N., Man, the State, and War. New York: Columbia University Press, 1959. Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1979. See also

Ruggie's review in World Politics, January 1983. Liberalism Doyle, Michael W., “Liberalism and World Politics Revisited,” in Charles W. Kegley, ed.,

Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995.

Doyle, Michael W., Ways of War and Peace. New York: W.W.Norton, 1997. Howard, Michael, War and the Liberal Conscience, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981. Moravcsik, Andrew, “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,”

International Organization, Vol. 51, No 4 (Autumn 1997).

6

Zacher, Mark W., and Richard A. Matthews, “Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands?” in Charles W. Kegley (ed.), Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. New York: St. Martin’s 1995.

World Order, World Society and the English School Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan

1977.) Burton, John W., Systems, States, Diplomacy and Rules. London: Cambridge University Press,

1968. Burton, John W., et. al., The Study of World Society: A London Perspective. Pittsburgh,

International Studies Association, 1974. Buzan, Barry, “From international system to international society: structural realism and regime

theory meet the English School,” International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 3 (Summer 1993), pp. 327-352.

Forum on the English School, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3 (July 2001). Robertson, B.A., (ed.), International Society and the Development of International Relations

Theory, London: Pinter, 1998. Keohane, O. Robert and Allen Buchanan. “The Preventive Use of Force: A Cosmopolitan

Institutional Proposal.” Ethics & International Affairs. Vol. 18, Issue 1, (2004): 1-23.

Regime Theory Baldwin, David A., (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism. New York: Columbia University Press,

1993. Buzan, Barry, “From international system to international society: structural realism and regime

theory meet the English School,” International Organization, Vol. 47, No. 3 (Summer 1993), pp. 327-352.

Grieco, Joseph, Cooperation Among Nations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990. Haas, Ernst, “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes,” World Politics, Vol.

32, No. 3 (April 1980), pp. 357-405. Haas, Peter M., (ed.), Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination. Also a special

issue of International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 1, Winter, 1992 Haggard, Stephen, and Beith A. Simmons, “Theories of International Regimes,” International

Organization, Vol.41, No. 3, Summer 1987. Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer and Volker Rittberger, Theories of International Regimes.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Krasner, Stephen D., (ed.), International Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. This was

also the Spring 1982 issue of International Organization. Krasner, Stephen D., Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press,

1999.

7

Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984.

Kratochwil, Friedrich, and John Gerard Ruggie, “International organization: a state of the art on

an art of the state,” International Organization. Vol. 40, No. 4 (1986), pp. 753-775. Rittberger, Volker, et al (eds.), Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon

Press, 1995. Ruggie, John G., (ed.) International Responses to Technology. Special Issue of International

Organization, Summer 1975. Snidal, Duncan, “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory,” International Organization, Vol. 39,

No. 4 (Autumn 1985), pp. 579-614. Stein, Arthur A., Why Nations Cooperate Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990. Young, Oran R., International Cooperation. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989. Constructivism Barkin, J. Samuel. 2003. “Realist Constructivism.” International Studies Review, 5 (September),

325-342. Checkel, Jeffery “The Constructivist Turn in International Theory,” World Politics, Vol. 50, No. 2

(January 1998), pp. 324-348. Dessler, David, “What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?” International Organization, 43

(Summer 1989), pp. 441-473 Kubalkova, Vendulka, Nicholas Onuf and Paul Kowert (eds.), International Relations in a

Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E.Sharpe, 1998. Lebow, Richard Ned, The Tragic Vision of Politics: Ethics, Interests and Orders. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press,2003. Onuf, Nicholas, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International

Relations, Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1989. Reus-Smit, Christian, “The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the Nature of

Fundamental Institutions,” International Organization, Vol. 51, No. 4 (Autumn 1997), pp. 555-589.

Ruggie, John G., “What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social

Constructivist Challenge,” International Organization, 52 (Autumn 1998), pp.855-885. Sterling-Folker, Jennifer, Theories of International Cooperation and the Primacy of Anarchy:

Explaining U.S. International Monetary Policy-Making After Bretton Woods. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 2002.

Thies, Cameron G. “Are Two Theories Better than One? Constructivist Model of the Neorealist-

Neoliberal Debate.” International Political Science Review. Apr. 2004, Vol. 25, Issue 2: 159-184.

Wendt, Alexander, “The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory,”

International Organization, 41 (Summer 1987), pp. 335-370.

8

Wendt, Alexander, “Anarchy is What States Make of It,” The Social Construction of Power

Politics,” International Organization 46 (Spring 1992), pp. 391-425. Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press, 1999. Post-Modernism, Discourse Analysis, Etc. Ashley, Richard K., "The Poverty of Neorealism," International Organization, Vol. 38, No. 2,

(Spring 1984). Ashley, Richard K., “Living on Border Lines: Man, Poststructuralism, and War, “ in James Der

Derian and Michael J. Shapiro, International/Intertextual Relations Lexington: Lexington Books, 1989.

Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity.

Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992. Der Derian, James, and Michael J. Shapiro (eds.), International/Intertextual Relations Lexington:

Lexington Books, 1989. Litfin, Karen, Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Co-operation.

New York: Columbia University Press, 1994. Mutimer, David, The Weapons State: Proliferation and the Framing of Security. Boulder, Colo:

Lynne Rienner, 2000. Price, Richard, “A Genealogy of the Chemical Weapons Taboo,” International Organization, 49

(Winter 1995), pp. 73-103. Rosenau, Pauline M., Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and

Intrusions, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992. Walker, R.B.J., Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 1993. Knowledge-based Theories Adler, Emanuel, “Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International

Relations and their Progress,” in Emanuel Adler and Beverly Crawford (eds.), Progress in Postwar International Relations, New York: Columbia University Press, 1991.

Goldstein, Judith, and Robert O. Keohane (eds.), Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions

and Political Change. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1993. Haas, Ernst, “Why Collaborate? Issue-Linkage and International Regimes,” World Politics, Vol.

32, No. 3 (April 1980), pp. 357-405. Haas, Ernst, When Knowledge is Power. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990. Haas, Ernst, “Reason and change in International Life: Justifying a Hypothesis,” in Robert L.

Rothstein (ed), The Evolution of Theory in International Relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1991

9

Haas, Peter M. (ed.), Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination Columbia, S.C.: University of South Carolina Press, 1997, (special issue International Organization, Winter 1992).

Litfin, Karen, Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Co-operation. New

York: Columbia University Press, 1994. Feminism Locher, Birgit, and Elisabeth Prügl, “Feminism and Constructivism: Worlds Apart or Sharing the

Middle Ground?” International Studies Quarterly, 45 (March 2001), pp. 111-129. Murphy, Craig, “Seeing women, recognizing gender, recasting international relations,”

International Organization, Vol. 50, No. 3 (Summer 1996). Special Issue: Women and International Relations, Millenium, Vol. 17, No. 3 (Winter 1988). Sylvester, Christine, Feminist Theory and International Relations in a Postmodern Era.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Tickner, J. Ann, “You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR

Theorists,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, No. 4 (December 1997), pp. 611-632. Critical and Radical Theory Cox, Robert, “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory,” in

R.O. Keohane, (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

George, Jim, Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations.

Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner, 1994. Lichtheim, George, Marxism: An Historical and Critical Study, New York: Columbia University

Press, 1964). Linklater, Andrew, Beyond Realism and Marxism: Critical Theory and International Relations.

London: Macmillan, 1990. Neufield, Mark, The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 1995. Risse, Thomas, “Let’s Argue!: Communicative Action in World Politics,” International

Organization, Vol. 54, No. 1 (Winter 2000). Culture and Identity Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity.

Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992. Connolly, William E., “Identity and Difference in Global Politics,” in James Der Derian and

Michael J. Shapiro, International/Intertextual Relations Lexington: Lexington Books, 1989.

Mathias, Albert, David Jacobson, Yosef Lapid (eds.), Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking

International Relations Theory, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001

10

Zalewski, Marysia, and Cynthia Enloe, “Questions about Identity in International Relations,” in Ken Booth and Steve Smith (eds.), International Relations Theory Today.University Park, Penn: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1995.

Evolutionary/Biological Campbell, Donald T., “Variation and Selective Retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution,” in Herbert

R. Barringer, George I. Blankstein and Raymond V. Mack (eds.), Social Change in Developing Areas: A Reinterpretation of Evolutionary Theory, Cambridge, Mass: Schenkman, 1965).

Dryzek, John S. and David Schlosberg, “Disciplining Darwin: Biology in the History of Political

Science,” in James Farr et al, (eds.), Political Science: Research Programs and Political Traditions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.

Kahler, Miles, “Evolution, Choice, and International Change,” in David A. Lake and Robert Powell

(eds.), Strategic Choice and International Relations Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1999

Special Issue: Evolutionary Paradigms in the Social Sciences, International Studies Quarterly,

Vol. 40, No. 3, (September 1996). Thayer, Brad, “Bringing in Darwin: Evolutionary Theory, Realism, and International Politics,”

International Security, Vol. 25, No. 2 (Fall 2000), pp. 124-151; Duncan S. A. Bell, Paul K. MacDonald, Brad Thayer, “Correspondence: Start the Evolution Without Us,” International Security, Vol. 26, No. 1 (Summer 2001)

Thompson, William R., (ed.), Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics. London: Routledge,

2001. Normative Theories and Theories about Norms Beitz, C.R., Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press,

1979. Beitz, C.R., "Bounded Morality: Justice and the State in World Politics," International

Organization, Summer 1979. Brilmayer, Lea, American Hegemony: Political Morality in a One-Superpower World. New Haven:

Yale University Press, 1994. Brown, Chris, International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches, New York: Columbia

University Press, 1993. Buruma, Ian, The Wages of Guilt: Memories of War in Germany and Japan,. New York: Farrar

Straus & Geroux, 1994. Ferguson, Niall, Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for

Global Power. New York: Basic Books, 2003. Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University

Press, 1996. Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,”

International Organization, 52 (Autumn 1998), pp. 887-917.

11

Hardin, Russell, John J. Mearsheimer, Gerald Dworkin and Robert E. Goodin (eds.), Nuclear

Deterrence: Ethics and Strategy, Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1985. Hoffmann, Stanley, Duties Beyond Borders. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1981. Jackson, Robert, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States, Oxford: Oxford U.

Press, 2000. Jones, Dorothy V., Code of Peace: Ethics and Security in the World of the Warlord States,

Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991. Kaldor, Mary, New and Old War: Organized Violence in a Global Era, Stanford: Stanford U.

Press. 1999. Kuperman, Alan J., The Limits of Humanitarian Intervention: Genocide in Rwanda. Washington,

DC:, Brookings Institution Press, 2001. Mazower, Mark, Dark Continent: Europe’s Twentieth Century, New York: Vintage Books, 2000. Nardin, Terry, and David R. Mapel (eds.), Traditions of International Ethics. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press. Nussbaum, Martha C., with Respondents. For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism,

Boston: Beacon Press, 1996. Patrick, Stewart, “The Evolution of International Norms: Choice, Learning, Power, and Identity,”

in William R. Thompson (ed.), Evolutionary Interpretations of World Politics, London: Routledge, 2001.

Price, Richard M., The Chemical Weapons Taboo. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997. Tannenwald,Nina, “The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Normative Basis of Nuclear

Non-Use,” International Organization, Vol. 53, No. 3 (Summer 1999). Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books, 1977. Walzer, Michael, Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad, Notre Dame: University

of Notre Dame Press, 1994.

B. International Political Economy and Related International Political Economy (General) Bergsten, C.F., and L.B. Krause (eds.), World Politics and International Economics.

Washington: Brookings, 1975. Also a special issue of International Organization, Winter 1975.

Cooper, R.N., The Economics of Interdependence. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1968. Cerny, Philip G., “Globalization and the changing logic of collective action,” International

Organization 49 (Autumn 1995) Gilpin, Robert, Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order,

Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.

12

Hirschman, Albert O., National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1945.

Katzenstein, P.J. (ed.), Between Power and Plenty: Foreign Economic Policies of Advanced

Industrial States. Special Issue of International Organization, Autumn 1977. Keohane, Robert O., and Helen V.Milner (eds.), Internationalization and Domestic Politics,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Kindleberger, Charles P., “Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation,

Public Goods, and Free Rides,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2 (June 1981)

Knorr, Klaus, and F.N. Trager (eds.), Economic Issues and National Security. Lawrence:

University of Kansas Press, 1977. Krasner, Stephen, “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics, Vol. 28,

No. 3 (April 1976), pp. 317-347. Porter, Michael E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press, 1990. Staniland, M., What is Political Economy? New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985. Strange, Susan, “What is economic power, and who has it?” International Journal, (Vol. 30, No. 2

(Spring 1975). Strange, Susan, States and Markets. London: Pinter, 1988 (or latest). Interdependence and Transnational Relations Keohane, Robert O., and J.S. Nye (eds.), Transnational Relations and World Politics.

Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971. Special issue of International Organization, Summer, 1971.

Keohane, Robert O., and J.S. Nye, "International Interdependence and Integration," in Handbook

of Political Science, Vol. 8. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1975. Keohane, Robert O., and J.S. Nye, Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown, 2nd ed.,

1989. See also their retrospective in International Organization, Vol. 41, No. 4 (Autumn 1987).

Maghroori, R., and B. Ramberg (eds.), Globalism versus Realism. Boulder: Westview Press,

1982. Nau, Henry, "From Integration to Interdependence: Gains, Losses and Continuing Gaps,"

International Organization, Winter 1979. Prakash, Aseem, and Jeffrey A. Hart (eds.), Globalization and Governance. London: Routledge,

1999. Risse-Kappen, Thomas, Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic

Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. Rogowski, Ronald, Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political

Arrangements, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1989.

13

Ruggie, John G. (ed.), The Antinomies of Interdependence. New York: Columbia University Press, 1983.

Integration Deutsch, Karl W. et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area, Princeton: Princeton

University Press, 1957. George, Stephen, Politics and Policy in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University

Press, 1991. Haas, E.B., Beyond the Nation-State. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964. Haas, E.B., “Turbulent fields and the theory of regional integration,” International Organization,

Vol. 30, No. 2 (Spring 1976). Lindberg, L.N., The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration. Stanford: Stanford

University Press, 1963. Lindberg, L.N., and Stuart A. Scheingold, Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the

European Community. Eglewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1970. Lindberg, L.N., and S.A. Scheingold, Regional Integration: Theory and Research. Cambridge:

Harvard University Press, 1971. Also a special issue of International Organization, Autumn, 1970.

Lodge, Juliet (ed.), The European Community and the Challenge of the Future. New York: St.

Martin’s Press, 1989. Nye, J.S., Peace in Parts. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971. Webb, C., "Introduction: Variations on a Theoretical Theme," in H. Wallace, W. Wallace and C.

Webb (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Communities. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1977.

Wendt, Alexander. “Why a World State is Inevitable. European Journal of International

Relations. Vol. 9(4): 491-542. Wivel, Anders. “The Power Politics of Peace.” Cooperation and Conflict. March 2004, Vol. 39,

Issue 1: 5-26.

Dependency, Imperialism, World-System Theory Caporaso, J.A. (ed.), Dependence and Dependency in the Global System. Special issue of

International Organization, Winter 1978. Cox, Robert W., “Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations

Theory,” in Robert O. Keohane (ed.), Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, 1986.

Frank, Andre Gunder, Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical Studies of

Chile and Brazil, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1969. Galtung, Johan, "A Structural Theory of Imperialism," Journal of Peace Research, 1971.

14

Hobson, J.A., Imperialism, various editions. Hollist, W.L., and J.N. Rosenau (eds.), World System Debates. Special issue of International

Studies Quarterly, March 1981 Hopkins, Terence K., Immanuel Wallerstein, et. al (eds.), World-Systems Analysis: Theory and

Methodology. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1982. Lenin, V.I., Imperialism, The Highest Stage of Capitalism, various editions. Modelski, G. (ed.), Transnational Corporations and World Order. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman,

1979. Mommsen, Wolfgang J. (translated by P.S. Falla), Theories of Imperialism Chicago: University of

Chicago Press, 1980. Owen, Roger, and Bob Sutcliffe (eds.), Studies in the Theory of Imperialism London: Longman,

1972. Smith, T., "The Underdevelopment of Development Literature: The Case of Dependency

Theory," World Politics, January 1979. Sunkel, Osvaldo, "Transnational Capitalism and National Disintegration in Latin America," Social

and Economic Studies, March 1973. Sweezy, Paul M., The Theory of Capitalist Development New York: Monthly Review Press, 1970. Wallerstein, I., The Modern World System (3 volumes). See also the review of Vol. 1 by Zolberg,

World Politics, January 1981. Wilber, C.K. (ed.), The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment. New York:

Random House, various editions.

C. International Law and Organizations (See also regime theory)

International Law Byers, Michael (ed.), The Role of Law in International Politics Oxford: Oxford University Press,

2000. Chayes, Abram and Antonia Handler Chayes, The New Sovereignty: Compliance with

International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.

Coplin,W.D., "International Law and Assumptions About the State System," World Politics, 1965. Ganji, Manouchehr, International Protection of Human Rights. Gevena: Libraire E. Droz, 1962. Hoffmann, Stanley, "International Systems and International Law," in Hoffmann, Stanley, The

State of War. New York: Praeger, 1965. Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, norms and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

1989.

15

Jackson, Robert H., Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World, Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press, 1990.

Keohane, O., Robert. “Governance in a Partially Globalized World Presidential Address.”

American Political Science. March 2001, Vol. 95, Issue 1: 1-15. Malanczuk,Peter, Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law. London: Routledge, 1997. Nardin, Terry, Law, Morality, and the Relations of Nations. Princeton: Princeton University

Press, 1983. Reus-Smit, Christian (ed.) The Politics of International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press, 2004. Slaughter Burley, Anne-Marie, “International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual

Agenda,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 87, No. 2 (April 1993). Slaughter, Anne-Marie et al., “International Law and International Relations Theory: A New

Generation of Interdisciplinary Scholarship,” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 92, No. 3 (July 1998), pp. 367-397.

Special Issue on Legalization and World Politics, International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3

(Summer 2000). Yasuaki, Onuma, “International Law in and with International Politics: The Functions of

International Law in International Society,” European Journal of International Law, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2003)

International Organizations Claude, Inis L., Swords Into Plowshares. New York: Random House, various editions. Hinsley, F.H., Power and the Pursuit of Peace: Theory and Practice in the History of Relations

Between States. London: Cambridge University Press, 1963. Jacobson, H.K., Networks of Interdependence. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1979. Kratochwil, Friedrich, and Edward D. Mansfield (eds.), International Organization: A Reader, New

York: Harper Collins, 1994. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of

Politics, New York: Macmillan, 1989. March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen, “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political

Orders,” International Organization, 52 (Autumn 1998), pp. 943-969. Ruggie, John G., Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization.

London: Routledge, 1998. Special Issue on Rational Design of International Institutions, International Organization, Vol. 55,

No. 1 (Autumn 2001) Weber, Steven, “Institutions and Change,” in Michael W. Doyle and G. John Ikenberry (eds.),

New Thinking in International Relations Theory Boulder, Colo.: Westview, 1997, pp. 229-265

16

Ziring, Lawrence, Robert Riggs and Jack Plano, The United Nations: International Organization and World Politics. New York: Harcourt Brace, 2000.

SECTION III: FOREIGN POLICY AND COMPARATIVE FOREIGN POLICY

A. Decision-Making and Related Decision-making/Perception/Psychological Axelrod, Robert, (ed.), Structure of Decision. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976. Farrell, J.C., and A.P. Smith (eds.), Image and Reality in International Politics. New York:

Columbia University Press, 1967. George, Alexander L., "The Causal Nexus Between Cognitive Beliefs and Decision-Making

Behavior: The 'Operational Code,'" in L.S. Falkowski (ed.), Psychological Models in International Politics. Boulder: Westview, 1979.

Janis, Irving L. Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1972. Jervis, Robert, Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton

University Press, 1976. See also his "hypotheses on Misperception," World Politics, April 1968, or Rosenau (1969).

Jervis, Robert, The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University

Press, 1970. Paige, G.D., The Korean Decision. New York: The Free Press, 1968. Snyder, R.C., H.W. Bruck and B. Sapin, Foreign Policy Decision-Making: An Approach to the

Study of International Politics. New York: The Free Press, 1962.

Bureaucratic Politics Allison, Graham T., Essence of Decision. Boston: Little, Brown, 1972 or latest. Art, R.J., "Bureaucratic Politics and American Foreign Policy: A Critique," Policy Sciences, 1973. Enthoven, A.C., and K.W. Smith, How Much is Enough? New York: Harper and Row, 1971. Halperin, Morton H., and A. Kanter (eds.), Readings in American Foreign Policy: A Bureaucratic

Perspective. Boston: Little Brown, 1973. Halperin, Morton H., Bureaucratic Politics and Foreign Policy. Washington: Brookings, 1974. Lucas, A., and R. Dawson, Organizational Politics of Defence. ISA, 1974. Neustadt, Richard E., "White House and Whitehall," Public Interest, 1966. Nossal,R.K., "Bureaucratic Politics and the Westminster Model," in R.O. Matthews, A.G. Rubinoff

and J.G. Stein (eds.), International Conflict and Conflict Management. Scarborough: Prentice-Hall of Canada, 1984 or latest.

17

Wohlstetter, Roberta, Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision. Stanford: Stanford University Press,

1962.

Crisis and Related Bargaining Brecher, M., and J. Wilkenfeld, "Crises in World Politics," World Politics, April 1982. Frei, D. (ed.), Managing International Crises. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1982. Hermann, C.F., Crises in Foreign Policy. New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1969. Hermann, C.F., (ed.), International Crisis: Insights From Behavioural Research. New York: The

Free Press, 1972. Holsti, O.R., Crisis, Escalation, War. Montreal: McGill, 1972. Snyder, G.H., and P. Diesing, Conflict Among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making and System

Structure in International Crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977. Smith, Steve. “Singing Our World into Existence: International Relations Theory and September

11.” International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 48, Issue 3, Sept. 2004: 499-516.

B. Foreign Policy (General) Cohen, B.C., and S.A. Harris, "Foreign Policy," in F.I. Greenstein and N.W. Polsby (eds.),

Handbook of Political Science, Vol. 6: Policies and Policymaking. Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1975.

Winham, Gilbert, “Negotiation as a Management Process,” World Politics, Vol. 30, No. 1 (October

1977). Evans, Peter B., Harold K. Jacobson and Robert D. Putnam (eds.), Double-Edged Diplomacy:

International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.

Hanreider, W.F., (ed.), Comparative Foreign Policy. New York: David McKay, 1971. Hermann, C.F., et. al., (ed.) New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy. New York: Harper

Collins, 1987. Jensen, L., Explaining Foreign Policy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1982. Jervis,R., Perception and Misperception in International Politics, Princeton: Princeton University

Press, 1976). Kissinger, H., "Domestic Structure and Foreign Policy," in Quester (ed.) above, or Daedalus,

Spring 1966. McGowan, P.J., and H.B. Shapiro, The Comparative Study of Foreign Policy: A Survey of

Scientific Findings. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1973. Putnam, Robert D., “Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games,” Intrnational

Organization, Vol. 42, No. 3 (Summer 1988).

18

Potter, W.C., "Issue Area and Foreign Policy Analysis," International Organization, Summer, 1980.

Rosenau, James N., The Scientific Study of Foreign Policy. London: Frances Pinter, 1980. See

also his "A Pre-Theory Revisited: World Politics in an Era of Cascading Interdependence," International Studies Quarterly, September 1984.

Viotti, P., and Murray, The Defense Policies of Nations. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins, 1982.

SECTION IV: STRATEGIC STUDES AND RELATED

A. General and Introduction to the Field General Art, R.J. and K.N. Waltz (eds.), The Use of Force. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971. Baylis, J., K. Booth, J. Garnett and P. Williams, Contemporary Strategy: Theories and Policies.

New York: Holmes and Meier, 1975. Buzan, Barry, People, States and Fear. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner, 1991. Brodie, Bernard, War and Politics, New York: Macmillan, 1973. Earle, E.M. (ed.), Makers of Modern Strategy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971. or

latest. Knorr, Klaus, Historical Dimensions of National Security Policy. Lawrence: University of Kansas

Press, 1976. Martin, L. (ed.), Strategic Thought in the Nuclear Age. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University

Press, 1979. Mearsheimer, J., John. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: Norton, 2001. Understanding the Field Baldwin, David. “The Concept of Security,” Review of International Studies 23:1 (1997): 5-26. Betts, Richard, “Should Strategic Studies Survive?” World Politics 50 (October 1997):7-33. Bull, Hedley. “Strategic Studies and its Critics,” World Politics 20 (1968): 593-605. Buzan, Barry. People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-

Cold War Ear, 2nd ed. Boulder: Reinner, 1998. Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever and Jaap de Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder:

Lynne Reinner Publisher, 1998. Gray, Colin. Modern Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Kolodziej, Edward, “Renaissance in Security Studies? Caveat Lector!” International Studies

Quarterly 36 (1992):421-438. Krause, Keith, and Michael Williams. "Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and

Methods", Mershon International Studies Review 40 (1996).

19

Ullman, Richard. “Redefining Security” in Global Dangers: Changing Dimensions of International

Security edited by Sean Kynn-Jones and Steven Miller. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995. Walt, Stephen. “The Renaissance of Security Studies,” International Studies Quarterly 35

(1991):211-239. The Classics Brodie, Bernard. Strategy in the Missile Age, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1959. Bull, Hedley. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. London: Macmillan,

1977). Carr, E.H.. The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International

Relations. London: Macmillan, 1939. Kahn, Herman. On Thermonuclear War. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960. Kissinger, Henry. Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1957. Sun Tzu, The Art of War, Boulder: Westview Press, 1996 von Clausewitz, Carl, On War, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976.

B. Traditional Foci

Causes and Conduct of War Blainey, Geoffrey. The Causes of War 3rd ed.. London: Macmillan, 1988. Booth, Ken. Strategy and Ethnocentrism. London: Croom Helm, 1979. Gaddis, John. We Now Know: Rethinking Cold War History. Oxford : Oxford University Press,

1997. Gilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981. Howard, Michael, The Causes of War 2nd ed. .Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983. Lebow, R.N., and Janice Stein. We all lost the Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press,

1992. Kennedy, Paul. The Rise and Fall of Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from

1500 to 2000. New York: Random House, 1987. Schelling, Thomas. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960. Small, Melvin and David Singer eds. International War: An Anthology. Chicago: Dorsey Press,

1989. Tuchman, Barbara W. The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam. New York: 1984. Van Crevald, Martin. The Transformation of War. New York: Free Press, 1991.

20

Walzer. Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York: Basic, 1977.

Deterrence and Coercive Diplomacy Brodie, Bernard, Strategy in the Missile Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1965. Freedman, L., The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy. London: Macmillan, 1983. George, A.L., D.K. Hall and W.E. Simons, The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy. Boston: Little,

Brown, 1971. George, A.L., and R. Smoke, Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice.

New York: Columbia University Press, 1974. Green, P., Deadly Logic. New York: Schocken, 1968. Kissinger, H., Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy. New York: Harper, 1957. Jervis, R., “Deterrence Theory Revisited,” World Politics, January 1979. Jervis, R., The Illogic of American Nuclerar Strategy, Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984. Kahn, H., On Escalation. New York: Praeger, 1965. Kahn, H., Thinking About the Unthinkable in the 1980s. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1984. Legault, A., and G. Lindsey, The Dynamics of the Nuclear Balance. Ithaca: Cornell University

Press, 1976. Morgan, P.M., Deterrence: A Conceptual Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1977. Schelling, Thomas C., Arms and Influence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966.

Arms Control and Related Blacker, C.D., and G. Duffy, International Arms Control: Issues and Agreements. Stanford:

Stanford University Press, 1984. Bull, Hedley, The Control of the Arms Race. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1961. Carnesale, A., et. Al., Living With Nuclear Weapons. New York: Bantam, 1983. Coffey, J., Arms Control and European Security. London: Chatto and Windus, 1977. Gray, C.S., The Soviet-American Arms Race. Westmead: Saxon House, 1976. Schelling. Thomas C., and M.H. Halperin, Strategy and Arms Control. Elmsford: Pergamon,

1985 and the original, 1961. Singer, J.D., Deterrence, Arms Control and Disarmament. Ohio State University Press, 1962.

C. Current Debates General

21

Betts, Richard (ed). Conflict After the Cold War: Arguments on Causes of War and Peace. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1994.

Friedman, George, and Meredith Friedman. The Future of War. New York: Random House,

1996. Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Avon Books, 1993. Huntington, Samuel. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York:

Simon and Schuster, 1996. Homer-Dixon, Thomas. Environment, Scarcity and Violence. Princeton: Princeton University

Press, 1999. Nye, Joseph. Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic, 1990. Tickner, Ann. Gender in International Relations: Feminists Perspectives on Achieving Global

Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992. Traditional/Non-traditional Conceptualzations of Security Alagappa, Muthiah (ed.), Asian Security Practice. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press,

1998. Campbell, David, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity.

Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1992. Katzenstein, Peter J. (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics.

New York: Columbia University Press, 1996. Kolodziej, Edward A., “Renaissance in Security Studies? Caveat Lector!”, International Studies

Quarterly, Vol. 36 (1992). Kolodziej, Edward A., “What is Security and Security Studies?: Lessons from the Cold War,”

Arms Control, Vol. 13, No. 1 (April 1992). See also the responses in a later issue. Krause, Keith, and Michael C. Williams (eds.), Critical Security Studies. Minneapolis: University

of Minnesota Press, 1997. Walt, Stephen M. “The Renaissance of Security Studies,” International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 35

(1991).

D. CANADIAN PERSPECTIVES Dewitt, David, David Haglund and John Kirton (eds.) Building a New Global Order. Toronto:

Oxford University Press, 1993. Dewitt, David, and David Leyton-Brown (eds.) Canada’s International Security Policy.

Scarborough: Prentice Hall, 1995.