Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
A G E N D A
CITY OF CORONADO CITY COUNCIL/ THE CITY OF CORONADO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR
AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONADO
Tuesday, March 1, 2016
Coronado City Hall Council Chamber 1825 Strand Way
Coronado, California 92118
CLOSED SESSION SPECIAL MEETING – 3:15 P.M. REGULAR MEETING – 4 P.M.
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if you need special assistance to participate in a City meeting or other services offered by this City, please contact the City Clerk’s office, (619) 522-7320. Assisted listening devices are available at this meeting. Ask the City Clerk if you desire to use this device. Upon request, the agenda and documents in the agenda packet can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability. Notification of at least 48 hours prior to the meeting or time when services are needed will assist the City staff in assuring that reasonable arrangements can be made to provide accessibility to the meeting or service.
CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATIONAUTHORITY: Government Code Section 54956.9(a), (d)(1)NAME OF CASE: Arthur Young v. City of Coronado
San Diego Superior Court, Case No. 37-2014-00037469-CU-EI-CTL
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATIONAUTHORITY: Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1) NAME OF CASE: City of Coronado v. LAFCO et al.
Case No. 37-2016-00000183-CU-WM-CTL
3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATIONPursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(2)One (1) potential caseFacts and circumstances need not be disclosed pursuant to Government Code Section54956.9(e)(1)
Joint City Council/SA Meeting March 1, 2016
AS A COURTESY TO OTHERS, PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES
4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – INITIATION OF LITIGATION AUTHORITY: Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) One (1) potential case 5. COMMUNICATIONS - ORAL: Each person wishing to speak before the City Council on only matters listed on this agenda shall approach the City Council, give their name, and limit their presentation to 3 minutes. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AND ANNOUNCE ACTION REGULAR MEETING (SA items are denoted by an *.) – 4 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL. 2. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
*3. MINUTES OF CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY: Approval of the minutes of the Regular meeting of February 16, 2016.
4. CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS. a. Proclamation: Coronado Woman’s Club Day. (Pg 1) 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: All items listed under this section are considered to be routine and will be acted upon with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a member of the City Council or the public so requests, in which event, the item will be considered separately in its normal sequence.
a. Approval of Reading by Title and Waiver of Reading in Full of Ordinances on this Agenda. (Pg 5)
Recommendation: Approve the reading by title and waive the reading in full of all Ordinances on the agenda.
*b. Review and Approve that the Warrants, as Certified by the City/Agency
Treasurer, are all Correct, Just, and Conform to the Approved Budget for FY 2015-2016. (Pg 7)
Recommendation: Approve the Warrants as certified by the City/Agency Treasurer.
c. Approval of Request from San Diego Worldwide Initiative to Safeguard
Humanity (WISH) for the City to Serve as Host of the 2016 Peace and Humanity Day on Friday, August 12. (Pg 51)
Recommendation: Approve the request.
Joint City Council/SA Meeting March 1, 2016
AS A COURTESY TO OTHERS, PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES
d. Filing of the Treasurer’s Reports on Investments for the City and the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency for the City of Coronado for the Quarter Ending December 31, 2015. (Pg 55)
Recommendation: Examine the quarterly Reports on Investments and order them filed.
e. Award of a Professional Engineering Services Contract to Atkins for a Not-to-
Exceed Amount of $52,500 for Phase 1 of the Design of the Wastewater Main Replacement Program. (Pg 73)
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Atkins for a not-to-exceed amount of $52,500 for Phase 1 of the design of the Wastewater Main Replacement Program.
f. Award of a Professional Engineering Services Contract to Atkins for a Not-to-
Exceed Amount of $55,000 for Phase 1 of the Design of the Glorietta Sewer Main Inspection Project. (Pg 83)
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Atkins for a not-to-exceed amount of $55,000 to research and complete the first phase of design of the Glorietta Sewer Main Inspection project.
g. Award of a Professional Engineering Design Services Contract with Psomas for a
Not-to-Exceed Amount of $49,740 for the FY 2015/16 Storm Drain Inlet Improvements Project. (Pg 85)
Recommendation: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Psomas for a not-to-exceed amount of $49,740 for the design of the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Storm Drain Inlet Improvement project.
h. Approval of a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Coronado Authorizing
the Receipt and Appropriation of $24,197 in Funds Provided by the Fiscal Year 2014-2015 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) through the County of San Diego. (Pg 93)
Recommendation: Approve “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Coronado Authorizing the Receipt and Appropriation of $24,197 in funds provided by the FY 2015 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) through the County of San Diego.”
i. Receive the Bicycle Advisory Committee Annual Report for 2015. (Pg 97) Recommendation: Accept the Bicycle Advisory Committee Annual Report
for 2015. j. Accept the Cultural Arts Commission’s Annual Report for 2015 and Work Plan
for 2016. (Pg 105) Recommendation: Accept the Cultural Arts Commission’s Annual Report
for 2015 and Work Plan for 2016.
Joint City Council/SA Meeting March 1, 2016
AS A COURTESY TO OTHERS, PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES
6. COMMUNICATIONS - ORAL: Each person wishing to speak before the City Council on any matter shall approach the City Council, give their name, and limit their presentation to 3 minutes. State law generally precludes the City Council from discussing or acting upon any topic initially presented during oral communication. (ORAL COMMUNICATIONS WILL BE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 10 MINUTES; ANY FURTHER COMMUNICATIONS WILL BE HEARD PRIOR TO THE MEETING ADJOURNMENT) 7. CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR:
a. Update on Council Directed Actions and Citizen Inquiries. (Informational Item)
8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: None. 9. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS: None. 10. COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS: None. 11. CITY COUNCIL:
a. Council Reports on Inter-Agency Committee and Board Assignments. (Questions allowed to clarify but no responses, discussion or action.) (Pg 117)
b. Introduction of “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Coronado,
California, Amending Section 3.60.020 of Chapter 3.60 of Title 3 of the Coronado Municipal Code Regarding Unclaimed Property.” (Pg 123)
Recommendation: Introduce “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Coronado, California, Amending Section 3.60.020 of Chapter 3.60 of Title 3 of the Coronado Municipal Code Regarding Unclaimed Property.”
c. Introduction of “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Coronado,
California Adding Section 56.08.080 to Chapter 56.08 of Title 56 of the Coronado Municipal Code to Authorize the Removal of Bicycles Remaining on Public Property for Over 72 Hours.” (Pg 129)
Recommendation: Introduce “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Coronado, California, Adding Section 56.08.080 to Chapter 56.08 of Title 56 of the Coronado Municipal Code Regarding Removal of Bicycles Remaining on Public Property for Over 72 Hours.”
d. Consideration of Appointment of Incumbent, Todd Little, to a Second Three-Year
Term on the Parks and Recreation Commission. (Pg 133) Recommendation: Appoint Todd Little to a second three-year term, which
will expire on March 31, 2019. e. Consideration of Appointment to Fill One Vacancy on the Transportation
Commission. (Pg 135) Recommendation: Appoint one individual to serve out the remainder of a
term, which will expire February 28, 2018.
Joint City Council/SA Meeting March 1, 2016
AS A COURTESY TO OTHERS, PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES
f. Provide Direction to Staff Regarding Public Right-of-Way Signs to be Consideredfor Removal. (Pg 143)Recommendation: Review the list of signs provided by CouncilmemberBailey and direct staff to work with the Traffic Operations Committee inmaking a recommendation on the final disposition on each of the signcategories the Council desires to be considered for removal.
g. City Management’s Approach, Principles, Applied Techniques and Timeline forPreparation and Implementation of the FY 2016-17 Financial Plan. (Pg 161)Recommendation: Receive report on the recommended approach andprinciples for preparing the FY 2016-17 financial plan and provide furtherdirection as needed.
h. Review and Acceptance of the 2014 Annual Traffic Report. (Pg 167)Recommendation: Review and accept the 2014 Annual Traffic Report.
12. CITY ATTORNEY: No report.
13. COMMUNICATIONS - WRITTEN:a. Consideration of Councilmember Bailey’s Request to Agendize City Council
Discussion to Amend Coronado Municipal Code Chapter 1.84 to Follow FairPolitical Practices Commission (FPPC) Guidelines Regarding Forms of PoliticalContributions. (Pg 201)
b. Consideration of Councilmember Bailey’s Request to Agendize City CouncilDiscussion to Amend Coronado Municipal Code Chapter 1.84.010 to AllowPolitical Fundraisers in the City of Coronado to Follow Government Code Section82015. (Pg 205)
c. Consideration of Councilmember Sandke’s Request to Agendize a Discussion toAmend the Coronado Municipal Code to Allow Leashed Dogs in Bay View Park.(Pg 211)
d. Consideration of Councilmember Bailey’s Request to Agendize City CouncilDiscussion Concerning Extending the Sidewalk on Ocean Drive to Include thePerimeter of Sunset Park that Borders Ocean Drive. (Pg 215)
14. ADJOURNMENT
A COPY OF THE AGENDA WITH THE BACKGROUND MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT CITY HALL, AT THE PUBLIC LIBRARY OR ON
OUR WEBSITE AT www.coronado.ca.us
Writings and documents regarding an agenda item on an open session meeting, received after official posting and distributed to the Council for consideration, will be made available for public viewing at the City Clerk’s Office at City Hall, 1825 Strand Way, during normal business hours. Materials submitted for consideration should be forwarded to the City Clerk’s Office at [email protected].
Joint City Council/SA Meeting March 1, 2016
AS A COURTESY TO OTHERS, PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 46 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CORONADO/ THE CITY OF CORONADO ACTING AS THE SUCCESSOR
AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CORONADO
Coronado City Hall 1825 Strand Way
Coronado, CA 92118 Tuesday, February 16, 2016
Mayor Tanaka called the regular meeting to order at 4 p.m.
1. ROLL CALL:
Present: Councilmembers/Agency Members Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode and Mayor Tanaka
Absent: None
Also Present: City Manager/Agency Executive Director Blair King City Attorney/Agency Counsel Johanna Canlas City Clerk/Agency Secretary Mary Clifford
2. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. Floyd Ross provided theinvocation and Mayor Tanaka led the Pledge of Allegiance.
3. MINUTES: Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council/the CityCouncil Acting as the Successor Agency of February 2, 2016.
MSUC (Downey/Woiwode) moved to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council/the City Council Acting as the Successor Agency of February 2, 2016, with de minimis corrections. The minutes were so approved. The reading of the minutes in their entirety was unanimously waived.
AYES: Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode, Tanaka NAYS: None ABSTAINING: None ABSENT: None
46
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 47 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016 4. CEREMONIAL PRESENTATIONS: Mayor Tanaka recognized Anna Kirschner for her dedication to the City and presented her with a City coin. 5. CONSENT CALENDAR: The City Council approved, adopted and/or accepted as one item of business Consent Agenda Items 5a through 5f. Mayor Tanaka suggested the addition of Item 11d. Councilmember Downey commented on Item 11d. Ms. Downey thought it might be a little confusing for the public and what this really is about is that we have more money than we thought we would. She thanked the City Manager and staff for their efforts to always manage our money so successfully. Councilmember Sandke requested that the mid-year budget be amended to include an expenditure of $60,000 to cover the cost of six additional speed advisory signs MS (Sandke/Downey) moved that the City Council approve the Consent
Calendar Items 5a through 5f with the addition of Item 11d – Provide Direction and Approve Changes to the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget at Mid-Year. Item 11d is amended to reflect an additional $60,000 expenditure for an additional six speed advisory signs.
Councilmember Bailey asked if the Council would have an opportunity to vote on where the six signs would go at a future date. Councilmember Downey is not sure why this approach is being taken. She doesn’t have a staff report and doesn’t have an understanding of why six signs are being asked for rather than two or some other number. Councilmember Sandke withdrew his motion. MSUC (Woiwode/Bailey) moved that the City Council approve the Consent
Calendar Items 5a through 5f AYES: Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode, Tanaka NAYS: None ABSTAINING: None ABSENT: None 5a. Approval of Reading by Title and Waiver of Reading in Full of Ordinances on this Agenda. The City Council waived the reading of the full text and approved the reading of the title only. 5b. Review and Approve that the Warrants, as Certified by the City/Agency Treasurer, are all Correct and Just, and Conform to the Approved Budgets for FY 2015-2016. The City Council approved payment of City warrant Nos. 10111363 thru 10111627 and City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the
47
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 48 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016
City of Coronado warrant No. 90005594. The City Council approved the warrants as certified by the City/Agency Treasurer.
5c. Authorization to Advertise the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Street Preventive Maintenance Project for Bid. The City Council authorized staff to advertise the FY 2015-16 Street Preventive Maintenance project for bid.
5d. Award of Contracts to (1) Palm Engineering, in the Amount of $308,400 for Construction of the Street, Curb and Gutter FY 14/15 Project and (2) to Psomas for Professional Engineering Construction Support and Construction Inspection Services for a Not-To-Exceed Amount of $44,000. The City Council awarded a contract to Palm Engineering in the amount of $308,400 for construction of the Street, Curb and Gutter FY 14/15 project and awarded a professional engineering contract to Psomas for construction support and construction inspection services for a not-to-exceed amount of $44,000.
5e. Award a Contract for Construction of the Glorietta Bay Pump Station Structural Repairs Project to Kaveh Engineering and Construction, Inc. in the Amount of $993,000 and Authorize the City Manager to Execute a Work Order for Construction Support Consulting Services to Harris and Associates in an Amount Not to Exceed $139,971. The City Council awarded a contract to Kaveh Engineering and Construction, Inc. in the amount of $993,000 for construction of the Glorietta Bay Pump Station Structural Repairs project, and authorized the City Manager to execute a work order with Harris and Associates in an amount not to exceed $139,971 for as-needed construction support services.
5f. Award of Construction Contract to Child’s Play, Inc. in the Amount of $38,165.75 for Installation of Pool Covers for the Aquatic Center Pools. The City Council awarded a construction contract in the amount of $38,165.75 to Child’s Play, Inc. for the purchase and installation of pool covers for the Aquatic Center pools.
6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Janet Francis, General Manager, Coronado Visitor Center and Director ofCommunications at CHA, announced that the new Visitor Guide has been outsince January 1 and shared some Visitor Center statistics.
b. Councilmember Downey spoke about the Lions’ Club speech contest that will beheld that evening at 7 p.m. The topic is ‘Justice for All.’
7. CITY MANAGER/EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR:
7a. Update on Council Directed Actions and Citizen Inquiries. None
At this point in the meeting, Mayor Tanaka took Item 10a Report from the Port Commissioner Concerning Port Activities out of order.
48
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 49 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS: 8a. Public Hearing: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Two-Lot Tentative Parcel Map to Allow for Condominium Ownership of Four Residential Units for the Property Addressed as 238 B Avenue in the R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) Zone (PC 2015-23) Peter Fait, Associate Planner, provided the report for this item. Councilmember Sandke asked if it is possible that the time will come when there will be R3 spots that won’t be able to be split where one house becomes four. Or will all the R3 homes go from one or two homes to four? Mr. Fait responded by saying that it depends on the ownership structure of the lots and whether a developer owns one lot or two side by side or three. Mr. Sandke wondered if it would get to the point where we would have the 28 units per acre before all have been converted. Mayor Tanaka suggested that it might help to consider that the zoning map gives an idea of what the maximum density could be but it certainly won’t help predict what that density will be. There isn’t any way to predict what the developer interests will be. It is a fair prediction that most people over time are going to consider maxing their density. Mr. Fait thinks you could get close to that 28 units per acre number. Mayor Tanaka opened the public hearing. Rick Turner, Kappa Survey & Engineering, was available to answer questions. Mayor Tanaka closed the public hearing. MSUC (Bailey/Tanaka) moved that the City Council adopt A RESOLTUION
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO APPROVING A TWO-LOT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO ALLOW FOR CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP OF FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 10 AND 11, BLOCK 151, MAP 376 CBSI, ADDRESSED AS 238 B AVENUE, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA. The Resolution was read by title, the reading in its entirety unanimously waived and adopted by City Council as RESOLUTION NO. 8785.
AYES: Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode, Tanaka NAYS: None ABSTAINING: None ABSENT: None
49
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 50 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016
8b. Public Hearing: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a One-Lot Tentative Parcel Map to Allow for Condominium Ownership of Four Residential Units for the Property Addressed as 1044-1050 Isabella Avenue in the R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) Zone (PC 2015-24) Peter Fait, Associate Planner, provided the report for this item.
Councilmember Sandke asked how the 28 units per acre is measured. Is it a circle from the developed property?
Mr. Fait responded that since our lots are so small it is usually translated down to square feet. The same equivalent is one unit per 1,556 square feet of land.
Mayor Tanaka pointed out that the 3,500 square foot number is sort of the special Coronado one. These numbers have been derived based on the traditional lot sizes in Coronado.
Mr. Sandke understands the ‘per lot’ part but it is the overall change in residential density that has him concerned.
Mayor Tanaka stated that the acre is the traditional unit of measure that is talked about in zoning maps but in Coronado it is sort of a nonsensical one. You end up coming back to what is an easier number for Coronado people to wrap their heads around.
Councilmember Downey responded to Mr. Sandke’s comment. This is something that the public has heard several times but she is not sure it is sinking in. We have one zone designated for multi-family housing. As a community, we realized from day one that we were not set out to be a private only, single-family homes community. We wanted to provide housing options for people that couldn’t afford single-family homes. The point of why the zones were set up the way they were was to provide housing choices for people, including rental choices for people. Whether the residents today are happy about that or not, that is how the City was laid out and any time we look at changing that the question then comes from the State side as to how we are meeting our obligations to provide housing for all types of people, including renters in our community. The way the City has been able to not have to take more affordable housing numbers or other types of housing we may not wish to fit in is by pointing to that R3 zone. If we were to take that away, we would be taking on another whole fight we are not ready to have yet. The City has been down this road. The City knows what happens if we try to change it. Maybe we want to do that but we can’t just change it.
Mayor Tanaka opened the public hearing.
Rick Turner, Kappa Survey & Engineering, was available to answer questions. He spoke to the proposed density for this property.
Mayor Tanaka closed the public hearing.
MSUC (Bailey/Tanaka) moved that the City Council adopt A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO APPROVING A ONE-LOT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO ALLOW FOR CONDOMINIUM OWNERSHIP OF FOUR RESIDENTIAL UNITS FOR THE PROPERTY LEGALLY
50
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 51 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016
DESCRIBED AS LOTS 25 AND 26, BLOCK 16, MAP 376 CBSI, ADDRESSED AS 1044-1050 ISABELLA AVENUE, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA. The Resolution was read by title, the reading in its entirety unanimously waived and adopted by City Council as RESOLUTION NO. 8786.
AYES: Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode, Tanaka NAYS: None ABSTAINING: None ABSENT: None 8c. Public Hearing: Adoption of a Resolution Approving a Two-Lot Tentative Parcel Map and a Request for Suspension of Subdivision Design Requirements for the Property Addressed as 475 A Avenue in the R-1B (Single Family Residential) Zone (PC 2015-20) Peter Fait, Associate Planner, provided the report for this item. Mayor Tanaka opened the public hearing. Rick Turner, Kappa Survey & Engineering, was available to answer questions. He spoke to the proposed density for this property. Delta Mercer has no problem with the size of these lots. She asked how many R1B divisions there have been through this Council and how many of the single family lots Coronado is losing every year. Mayor Tanaka closed the public hearing. Councilmember Woiwode is glad we have the opportunity, in the case of this property, to make this decision instead of being doomed to the long, tall, narrow as we were on the corner of Sixth and C. That project would have been much more attractive if it had faced the park instead of facing B. This is a good instance of where we can make the right decision. Mayor Tanaka thanked staff for pointing out where exceptions like this have been granted. MSUC (Woiwode/Sandke) moved that the City Council adopt A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO APPROVING A TWO-LOT TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND A REQUEST FOR SUSPENSION OF SUBDIVISION DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR LOT DEPTH FOR PARCEL 2 FOR THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 24, BLOCK 117, MAP 376 CBSI, ADDRESSED AS 475 A AVENUE, CORONADO, CALIFORNIA. The Resolution was read by title, the reading in its entirety unanimously waived and adopted by City Council as RESOLUTION NO. 8787.
Councilmember Downey asked to see the renderings of what the properties will look like when they are done. She echoed Mr. Woiwode’s comments on the opportunities for these projects.
51
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 52 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016
AYES: Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode, Tanaka NAYS: None ABSTAINING: None ABSENT: None
9. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS: None.
10. COMMISSION AND COMMITTEE REPORTS:
10a. Report from the Port Commissioner Concerning Port Activities. PortCommissioner Garry Bonelli reported on the South Grand Caribe Island park project. The Boy Scouts have expressed an interest in helping out with the cleanup project and he and the Coronado Cays have worked through some of the issues that came up in discussions about that project. The Port met with the Coronado Yacht Club on that upcoming project. The issue that came up with that project is that the project can always be appealed by a variety of individuals or organizations.
Councilmember Woiwode asked about plans for Seaport Village and concerns that people in Coronado had about what might be planned for Seaport Village.
Admiral Bonelli responded that the Port will put out an RFQ within the next four weeks looking at the area just south of the USS Midway all the way down past the headquarters and will look at a master redevelopment plan for that area. The Port will be looking for the best and brightest ideas from around the world for how to redevelop that area. The people at Seaport Village will also be able to make a proposal.
Mayor Tanaka asked which Port commissioners have been the most excited about that vision.
Admiral Bonnelli responded that they all refer to that as the 100% corner. All seven commissioners are looking at that and saying that there are a lot of possibilities for what can be done there.
Councilmember Downey asked how that is going to match with the Navy’s plan for their facilities.
Admiral Bonelli explained that the Navy is now working on their headquarters and anyone who submits a proposal will have to realize what is going on right across the street.
Councilmember Sandke asked about North Grand Caribe Isle. What is the current status on that particular property?
Admiral Bonelli explained that the developer was seeking curb cuts for their dry boat storage there. The Port approved that and it is back in the City’s court.
11. CITY COUNCIL BUSINESS:
11a. Council Reports on Inter-Agency Committee and Board Assignments.
Councilmember Bailey will submit his report in writing.
52
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 53 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016 Councilmember Woiwode added to his submitted report by saying that he attended the Imperial Beach State of the City address; attended the SD MAC Board of Directors meeting; the League of California Cities briefing on medical marijuana; a SANDAG Transportation Committee meeting; briefed a Japanese delegation as the Chairperson for the SANDAG Military Working Group on relations between military bases and surrounding communities. Councilmember Sandke reported on Sunday’s tour of City Hall for the Webelos. Councilmember Downey submitted her report in writing. Mayor Tanaka met with a group hoping to bring a Navy SEAL statue to Coronado with the Cultural Arts Commission; joined the Friends of the Library at their Library Night; spoke with folks from FM 94.1. 11b. Review of Requirements to Install Left-Turn Prohibitions from Westbound SR 75 (Third Street) onto A, B, and C Avenues. City Manager Blair King introduced the item and City Attorney Johanna Canlas assisted with the presentation. Councilmember Bailey asked if the ballot language would be written before directing staff to begin an EIR. Ms. Canlas responded that the ballot language would be to determine what the project is and that would determine what is being studied. Mr. Bailey asked how long it would take to draft that language. Ms. Canlas believes that could happen in time for the meeting after the next one. Councilmember Woiwode commented that staff has shown that there will be an impact. Does that mean the impact is likely to be similar to what was done the last time? The analysis that has been done so far that caused us to say we need an environmental review, focused or otherwise, does it mean that we see a significant impact to the traffic patterns? Mr. King responded by saying that, in terms of CEQA, the project was identified, we identified the impacts on the environment, asked for comments and review, identified that the impacts on the environment were significant enough to require an EIR. Ms. Canlas added that we have identified specific areas that would have potential significant impact but outside of that we haven’t delved into it because it would require a consultant to do that and appropriating the necessary funds to get them on board. Councilmember Downey asked the City Attorney to confirm for her and the public that when this happened in 2004 we were actually doing a temporary, that’s why we didn’t do CEQA first, study to see what happened. Before we ever got to the point of having to do an environmental review to see if it was going to be permanent the public stood up and said no and put it on the ballot and voted it down.
53
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 54 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016
Ms. Canlas thinks there was a temporary done and then that was challenged for CEQA purposes at which point the City was ordered to remove them but removal of the semi-diverters constituted a project in itself so the City was required to conduct an environmental review. Before the environmental review was completed, there was a separate citizens’ initiative that garnered enough signatures that put it on the ballot.
Ms. Downey commented that the environmental review did show that there was an environmental impact from removing the semi-diverters. Moving the traffic from one way to another has shown to be significant.
Councilmember Sandke understands that if this came forward as a citizens’ initiative to do the A, B or C Avenue restrictions it would not require CEQA or an EIR process. He asked for verification of that from the City Attorney.
Ms. Canlas explained that is correct. CEQA guidelines point out that a separate citizens’ initiative without the public agency being involved is exempt from CEQA.
Mr. Sandke finds that interesting, as the impacts would be the same regardless of who instigates the project.
Ms. Canlas added that the courts have upheld that citizen initiatives are exempt from CEQA.
The Mayor invited public comment.
Carolyn Rogerson asked if a citizens’ initiative was somehow put forth that limited the number of these multiple family dwelling units if that would be possible.
John Orlowski commented that the last time traffic was diverted from A, B and C it went to D and E Avenues. Orange Avenue lacked the capacity then and it lacks the capacity now to absorb any additional traffic. Traffic today is often backed up on Third Street waiting to turn left on Orange Avenue. The City created gridlock then and will create gridlock now if it again closes A, B and C Avenues. Back in November 2004 and after many, many months of traffic gridlock, the citizens of Coronado, by a margin of two to one, approved Prop M to reopen A, B and C Avenues. You need a real long-term traffic solution rather than reverting back to your old methods that just move traffic from one street to another. If you are truly concerned about pedestrian safety and lives along Fourth Street at A, B and C Avenues, then please erect immediately no crossing pedestrian barriers with signs that direct the pedestrians and the bicyclists to use the crosswalk at Fourth Street and Orange Avenue. Use the no pedestrian crossing barrier at the intersection of Third and Orange Avenue as your example. Again, if you are truly concerned about pedestrian safety and lives on Fourth Street at A, B and C Avenues, then please, immediately, erect no pedestrian crossing barriers with signs that direct the pedestrians and bicyclists to use the crosswalk on Fourth Street at Orange Avenue.
Fern Nelson thinks that we should continue to explore all aspects. We have a multi-faceted traffic problem and it requires a multi-faceted answer. Looking into this is reasonable as is looking into the speed ticket generator. Everything should be on the table to look into. We have no perfect solution.
54
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 55 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016 Eric Kasarjian spoke about using computer tools to solve complex problems. Coronado has a complex problem but it isn’t that complex. He sees a lot of frustration. We need to rely on our experts. Let’s work on this in a timely way and try to project to the City and the residents that the Council does care and is moving forward so everyone won’t feel so frustrated and angry at the inability to reach something that we can work on. Mayor Tanaka is disappointed that we can’t get the paperwork done in such a way that the public could vote on this in the upcoming election. He thinks we would have a majority if not a unanimous group that would want to come up with something for our voters to be able to give us direct feedback on. It seems to him as if the no turn restrictions could have been placed on the ballot by November but if staff says that the proper steps involving CEQA make it unlikely that it would be finished by July he accepts that reality. If we have failed by being able to get this on the ballot by November, then what we can succeed at is at least getting the environmental paperwork in order for either or both of these options. Since we have lost the ability to get this on the ballot this year, he doesn’t see any reason not to study both. He does support the cul-de-sacs because he thinks it is a more comprehensive way of dealing with the problem. It may not turn out to be the solution so it makes sense to examine Mr. Bailey’s idea of no turn restrictions. As far as the voters, we know what they said the last time. The last time they wanted access to their streets and they didn’t want them blocked. They didn’t want the City to eliminate their movement. The whole point of putting it on the ballot is to see if the voters would reconsider that position or if they feel the same way. The most logical way to proceed would be to direct staff to move forward with environmental documents that consider both options. He asked Ms. Canlas if he heard her say that it is preferable to pick one of the two as the lead option and the other as an alternative or is there a way the City can create two tracks where either one could move forward. Ms. Canlas thinks that we can do two sets of ballot language, one of which is just a no left turn and the other is the cul-de-sac. Mr. King commented that normally you would not want to put two ballot initiatives on the ballot at the same time. He thinks we could prepare an environmental document related to the cul-de-sac which is a higher level of review and that could be notched down by the Council. Mayor Tanaka wanted to go back to language Mr. Bailey used in one of his questions. He asked how long it would take to put the ballot language together. The response was about a month or two Council meetings. He is suggesting putting the language together for both ballot options and that doesn’t mean we are going to put both on the ballot. It means we want both options available. At some point in the future we can make a decision or combine them into one. He doesn’t see the harm in putting two sets of ballot language together with a decision to come at a future time. Mr. King feels that is fine and thinks that both he and Mayor Tanaka are suggesting starting off with the most restrictive option or the highest standard and then you can move down. Councilmember Bailey commented that his original request for restricted left hand turns was limited because he was hoping to avoid the need to go back to the public for a vote. That’s why he was trying to limit it to afternoon rush hour. But obviously we have to go back to the people because of Prop M. One of the speakers said that it was gridlocked then and it would be gridlocked now. That may or may not be true. In 2010, the situation along the 300 block of Orange Avenue changed. We extended the two left turn lanes there and increased capacity. Capacity in the 300
55
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 56 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016 block of Orange turning left onto Fourth Street has increased since the semi-diverters went down in 2004. The situation has changed to some degree so maybe the public would be more open to this proposal now then they were back then. His personal preference would be to direct staff to come back with language for two ballot measures, one for the left hand turn restrictions and one for the cul-de-sac option, so that we can see what they look like. He would also like to add onto the ballot language that we extend those two left turn lanes on Orange Avenue to the greatest extent possible to increase capacity. He is interested in hearing how his colleagues feel about that. Mayor Tanaka pointed out that part of doing an environmental study is to look at what exists and what you could do differently. When those barriers were put in, it was called a temporary project meaning that they didn’t study or try to attempt to forecast what the impacts would be. They felt threatened by Caltrans at the time. They reacted to that threat and they felt that putting in a temporary set of barriers was better than putting in lights at the time. No matter what we do in terms of one of these options or two of these options or more, we are going to have to study how it will impact D and E. We will have to study what the current capacity is on Orange as it is configured versus what that capacity could be. He thinks it would be premature to put that into the ballot language because we don’t know what the study is going to tell us. Part of having a study and then eventually putting it on the ballot is then telling the voters after the environmental review that the City is ready to make that language. Theoretically, you might find out in the study that extra capacity isn’t needed. It is unlikely that would be the case but until we have real data we shouldn’t presume to know what the data is going to say. It might just be easier to keep the language plainer. Mr. Bailey understands and commented that if the plainer language is the language that the majority of the Council wants to go forward with he will support that. Just by standing on the corner of Fourth and Orange and observing the traffic patterns during afternoon rush hour making those two left turns it doesn’t take a traffic engineer to say that increasing the capacity of those two left turn lanes certainly wouldn’t be a bad thing for anyone. Ms. Downey wanted to clarify that because of the way we are going to do the CEQA we are doing the ballot language first but there is nothing that suggests that when we are done with getting our recommendations and the mitigation could very well be to extend the lanes down Orange so that we get rid of the problem. She agrees with Mayor Tanaka that she wants the language to be very direct to what we are studying and then let the consultants come back with how we fix any mitigation should we decide to put it on the ballot. Mayor Tanaka doesn’t want the public to get the impression that we are interested in tearing up the median. That is a whole other political consideration. It would be better, if we have to make that proposal, to say that the study shows that as necessary. Mr. Sandke likes the dual track on the ballot language. Every EIR he has ever read includes a ‘no build’ option, several alternatives and mitigation. He thinks everyone is ready to read those. He is supportive of the efforts. He is not 100% certain, internally, that 24/7 closings of those three is what is right for the overall solution in the town. He is certainly willing to move forward with looking at it. He is befuddled by the process a little bit and saddened that we have to spend a couple hundred thousand dollars to think about this when the turn restrictions during rush hour would be an easy thing to do from a practical standpoint just to see how it is going. He is surprised
56
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 57 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016 that someone on A, B or C hasn’t just parked a truck there to see what would happen. He will be supportive of moving forward on this. Councilmember Woiwode thinks we want to be able to answer this question. Whether we go forward with the project, whether we go forward with the ballot measure, he thinks we need to do the analysis so we can answer the question. And, of course, we need to look at all the options that are associated with it. MSUC (Tanaka/Woiwode) moved that the City Council direct staff to put
together ballot language for both a left turn prohibition for A, B and C Avenues on Third Street and cul-de-sacing of A, B and C Avenues off of Third Street.
AYES: Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode, Tanaka NAYS: None ABSTAINING: None ABSENT: None 11c. Consideration of Appointment to Fill One Vacancy on the Bicycle Advisory Committee. Mayor Tanaka described the process to be used for selection. Morgan Miller introduced himself to the Council and the public. The City Clerk read the names and recorded the votes for the first round of voting as follows: Marc Homan four votes Morgan Miller five votes The City Clerk read the names and recorded the votes for the first round of voting as follows: Marc Homan four votes Morgan Miller three votes MSUC (Tanaka/Sandke) moved that the City Council appoint Marc Homan to
serve the remainder of a term on the Bicycle Advisory Committee to expire November 30, 2017.
AYES: Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode, Tanaka NAYS: None ABSTAINING: None ABSENT: None 11d. Provide Direction and Approve Changes to the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Budget at Mid-Year. Councilmember Sandke explained that the reason for his request is because of the discussion that took place about immediate actions that could be taken on Third and Fourth Streets. He thinks these signs have made a difference. It has been pointed out to him that speeding exists in other problem areas of town including Alameda as well as the blocks on Third and Fourth that exist between the Base and Orange Avenue. This investment would immediately see pragmatic
57
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 58 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016 results for our citizens. The City Manager informed him that he could include an amendment to the mid-year budget for $60,000 which would provide permitting and installation for six of those signs. Mayor Tanaka asked if it is fair to characterize Mr. Sandke’s request as asking for an appropriation of $60,000 for six speed advisory signs. Mr. Sandke clarified that he is asking for up to six signs. Mayor Tanaka continued by saying that part of what the Council can direct, if it wants, is for the Manager to come back to the Council with a discussion of where staff recommends placement. Mr. Sandke has made a funding request. If that funding request is granted, then staff can come back at a future date. He asked Mr. King if he was comfortable with the $10,000 figure per sign. Mr. King explained that he got that number from Public Services as a high side number. Mayor Tanaka asked Mr. Sandke why he has the number six in mind. Mr. Sandke responded that he spoke with the City Manager and staff months ago and it was determined that there is an opportunity to add one to each side of Third and Fourth to take care of that roadway since we only have them on one side of the roadway; he would like to see two in between the Base and the bridge; and on Alameda. He does leave the specific locations to staff for recommendation. Staff recommended that the Council adopt Schedules C and D, which incorporate all of the adjustments, and then amend that to include the $60,000. The Mayor invited public comment. Eva Yakudis commented on the $219,000 allocation for bulb outs, speed tables and some other things, Item 2c. It does not say where those are located but she can only assume those are related to the Fehr and Peer study. She is curious as to the location that allocation will fund. A lot of the things in that report are still live there. Mr. King explained that the direction out of the Council was broken down into three parts. One is a speed table that is currently being evaluated on Third Street at Pomona and on Pomona. We prepared one location. We do not know what the response will be from Caltrans but we are preparing an encroachment for that location. We are preparing one as a test. We are also, with a separate consultant, preparing an encroachment for bulb-outs at three different locations. Staff feels, based on personal conversations with Caltrans, although this is nothing official, that Caltrans may be more receptive to the bulb-out request than they have been in the past. The third consultant is preparing the full request for the signal at Fourth and Alameda. Because that had previously been the subject of a proposal that is more complete at this time and is nearly complete. Ed Walton, City Engineer, provided additional information. Councilmember Downey wanted to clarify that those items are under the engineering list on page 148. They are coming out of Public Safety’s department but it is still General Fund money.
58
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Page 59 City Council of the City of Coronado/the City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado of February 16, 2016 Mr. King responded that it is all General Fund money. How we do projects is we move it from the General Fund and put it in a separate capital projects fund. Ms. Downey understands but thinks that we will be adding something that Mr. Sandke asked for. Do we need to identify what fund it is supposed to be coming out of? Mr. King responded that staff can address that. MSUC (Sandke/Tanaka) moved that the City Council approve the staff recommendation and amend that to include an up to $60,000 expenditure for speed advisory signs. AYES: Bailey, Downey, Sandke, Woiwode, Tanaka NAYS: None ABSTAINING: None ABSENT: None 12. CITY ATTORNEY: No report. 13. COMMUNICATIONS - WRITTEN: None. 14. ADJOURNMENT: The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 5:37 p.m.
Approved: (Date), 2016
______________________________ Casey Tanaka, Mayor City of Coronado Attest: ______________________________ Mary L. Clifford, CMC City Clerk
59
PROCLAMATION: CORONADO WOMAN’S CLUB DAY
The Mayor will present the proclamation to members of the Woman’s Club.
03/01/16
1
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2
3
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
4
APPROVAL OF READING BY TITLE AND WAIVER OF READING IN FULL OF ORDINANCES ON THIS AGENDA
The City Council waives the reading of the full text of every ordinance contained in this agenda and approves the reading of the ordinance title only.
03/01/16
5
5a
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
6
7
5b
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
APPROVAL OF REQUEST FROM SAN DIEGO WORLDWIDE INITIATIVE TO SAFEGUARD HUMANITY (WISH) FOR THE CITY TO SERVE AS HOST OF THE 2016 PEACE AND HUMANITY DAY ON FRIDAY, AUGUST 12
San Diego WISH has submitted the attached e-mail requesting that the City again host an event in the Council Chambers and at the Municipal Pool on the evening of August 12, 2016 from 6 to 8:45 p.m. The event is in memory of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and follows the ceremonial ringing of the Yokohama Friendship Bell at Shelter Island earlier in the day.
Submitted by: City Clerk/Clifford Attachment: Request from San Diego WISH
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR NA JNC MLC NA NA NA NA NA NA RAM
03/01/16
51
5c
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
52
53
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
54
FILING OF THE TREASURER’S REPORTS ON INVESTMENTS FOR THE CITY AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR THE CITY OF CORONADO FOR THE QUARTER ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2015
RECOMMENDATION: Examine the quarterly Reports on Investments and order them filed.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City receives funds from many sources, which it invests according to the City of Coronado Investment Policy. All investments are made with the primary objectives of safety, liquidity and yield, in that order. The funds of the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency are also invested according to the City of Coronado Investment Policy.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Information item only.
PUBLIC NOTICE: Not required.
BACKGROUND: In compliance with the City’s Investment Policy, staff prepares an investment report and presents this to the City Council for review following the close of each quarter. The report presents investments for both the City and the Successor Agency portfolios. Combined, these two portfolios total approximately $115.9 million in cash and investments as of December 31, 2015.
ANALYSIS: This report covers the period October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015. Attached are summaries that identify all investments including those under management with PFM Asset Management LLC (the City’s investment advisor). This report also highlights annual investment earnings relative to budget.
City cash, investments and the percentage of total are as follows:
Name Book Value % of TotalLocal Agency Investment Fund, General Fund 37,247,580$ 35.1%Local Agency Investment Fund, Harpst 4,651,728 4.4%Municipal Bonds, Harpst 629,380 0.6%Federal Agency Securities - managed by PFM 57,876,622 54.6%Certificates of Deposit with San Diego Private Bank 250,000 0.2%Cash in Bank at Union Bank 2,416,730 2.3%OPEB Trust Investment Portfolio with PARS 2,955,000 2.8%
Total 106,027,040$
Overall, City investment earnings for the period October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, were $229,038, equivalent to 60% of the fiscal year budget projection of $384,600. Across all managed portfolios, investment returns on Treasuries and Federal Agency obligations required by the City’s conservative investment policy continue to average 0.34% annually. The investment performance for Fiscal Year 2016 is above budgeted projections due to a higher than
3/1/2016
555d
expected cash balance that is available for investment. The amount available for investment has grown as a result of higher than expected property tax and other General Fund revenues. Successor Agency cash, investments and the percentages of the total are as follows: Name Book Value % of TotalLocal Agency Investment Fund 6,469,107$ 65.9%Bond Proceeds invested with CAMP 178,782 1.8%Fiscal Agent Holdings 2,992,744 30.5%Cash in Bank at Union Bank 172,350 1.8%
Total 9,812,983$ Earnings for the Community Development Successor Agency October 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015, were $9,863. All earnings are applied toward payment of enforceable obligations in subsequent periods. Attached is an investment summary for the City and Successor Agency along with the quarterly Investment Performance Review prepared by the City’s investment advisor, PFM Asset Management LLC. The Review includes information on market conditions and a discussion of the City’s portfolio performance. The attached detailed monthly reports for October, November and December list individual securities held by the City, their market values, and the trades/transactions that occurred. ALTERNATIVE: None. Submitted by Administrative Services/Krueger, Treasurer Attachments: City of Coronado Quarterly Treasurer’s Report
The City of Coronado Acting as the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency of the City of Coronado Treasurer’s Report
PFM Asset Management Quarterly Portfolio Review I:\STFRPT\Budget & Finance\City and CDA Treas Rpt DEC15.doc
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR JK JNC MLC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
3/1/2016
56
57
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
58
Cit
y o
f C
oro
nad
o
P
ort
foli
o R
evi
ew
fo
r th
e
Qu
art
er
En
ded
Decem
ber
31,
2015
PF
M A
sset
Man
ag
em
en
t L
LC
601 S
outh
Fig
uer
oa,
Suit
e 4500
Lo
s A
ngel
es, C
A 9
0017
© 2
01
5 P
FM
As
se
t M
an
ag
em
en
t L
LC
59
© 2
016
PFM
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t LLC
Sum
mar
y•
The
Fede
ral O
pen
Mar
ket C
omm
ittee
(FO
MC
) inc
reas
ed th
e ta
rget
fede
ral
fund
s ra
te b
y 25
bas
is p
oint
s (b
ps) (
0.25
%) a
t its
Dec
embe
r mee
ting
— it
s fir
st ra
te h
ike
sinc
e 20
06. I
n do
ing
so, t
he F
OM
C s
tress
ed it
s in
tent
ion
to
norm
aliz
e ra
tes
at a
gra
dual
pac
e.
• Th
e ye
ar e
nded
with
stro
ng jo
b gr
owth
mom
entu
m a
s th
e ec
onom
y ad
ded
292,
000
new
jobs
in D
ecem
ber.
This
bro
ught
the
2015
tally
to 2
.65
mill
ion
new
jobs
in to
tal —
eno
ugh
to s
hrin
k th
e un
empl
oym
ent r
ate
to 5
%. W
age
infla
tion
edge
d up
mod
estly
, sug
gest
ing
a ch
ance
for f
utur
e in
flatio
n.•
Whi
le th
e Fe
dera
l Res
erve
(Fed
) too
k th
e fir
st s
tep
to n
orm
aliz
e in
tere
st
rate
s, o
ther
cen
tral b
anks
hav
e co
ntin
ued
to im
plem
ent a
ccom
mod
ativ
e m
onet
ary
polic
ies.
The
Eur
opea
n C
entra
l Ban
k (E
CB
) ext
ende
d its
mon
etar
y ea
sing
pol
icy
thro
ugh
the
first
qua
rter o
f 201
7 an
d cu
t its
dep
osit
rate
furth
er
into
neg
ativ
e te
rrito
ry (-
0.3%
). Th
e B
ank
of J
apan
(BO
J) a
nd P
eopl
e’s
Ban
k of
Chi
na (P
BO
C) a
lso
rem
ain
acco
mm
odat
ive.
Econ
omic
Sna
psho
t•
U.S
. gro
ss d
omes
tic p
rodu
ct (G
DP
) exp
ande
d at
a 2
% ra
te in
the
third
qu
arte
r, do
wn
from
the
seco
nd q
uarte
r due
to a
redu
ctio
n in
inve
ntor
y ac
cum
ulat
ion.
• In
a y
ear-
end
bipa
rtisa
n ne
gotia
tion,
Con
gres
s pa
ssed
a $
1.1
trilli
on
spen
ding
and
tax
budg
et, w
hich
als
o lif
ted
the
40-y
ear b
an o
n U
.S. c
rude
oil
expo
rts.
• G
loba
l com
mod
ity p
rices
con
tinue
d to
fall,
incr
easi
ng c
once
rns
over
gl
obal
gro
wth
and
the
sust
aina
bilit
y of
pro
duce
rs w
ithin
the
ener
gy s
ecto
r. H
eadl
inin
g th
is ro
ut w
ere
oil p
rices
, whi
ch c
ontin
ued
to s
lide,
sin
king
to le
ss
than
$35
per
bar
rel i
n D
ecem
ber —
the
low
est l
evel
sin
ce F
ebru
ary
2009
. •
Chi
na c
ontin
ued
to a
llow
the
yuan
to w
eake
n, e
ndin
g th
e ye
ar a
t its
low
est
leve
l ver
sus
the
U.S
. dol
lar i
n ne
arly
six
yea
rs. T
he C
hine
se e
cono
my
cont
inue
d to
slo
w —
sto
king
mar
ket c
once
rn o
ver t
he w
orld
’s s
econ
d-la
rges
t ec
onom
y —
thou
gh it
is e
xpec
ted
to m
eet i
ts m
ajor
eco
nom
ic ta
rget
s fo
r the
ye
ar.
Inte
rest
Rat
es•
The
new
targ
et ra
nge
for t
he fe
dera
l fun
ds ra
te, a
s es
tabl
ishe
d by
the
FOM
C,
is 2
5 to
50
bps,
end
ing
the
FOM
C’s
sev
en-y
ear “
zero
inte
rest
rate
pol
icy.
” •
Inte
rest
rate
s ac
ross
the
curv
e m
oved
up
sign
ifica
ntly
thro
ugho
ut th
e qu
arte
r, w
ith th
e 10
-yea
r ris
ing
appr
oxim
atel
y 23
bps
to 2
.27%
and
the
two-
year
m
ovin
g al
mos
t 42
bps
to 1
.05%
.•
On
the
shor
ter e
nd, 1
2-m
onth
Tre
asur
y bi
lls ti
cked
up
appr
oxim
atel
y 30
bps
to
0.6
0%.
Sect
or P
erfo
rman
ce•
U.S
. Tre
asur
y be
nchm
ark
retu
rns
wer
e ne
gativ
e fo
r all
but t
he s
horte
st
mat
uriti
es (s
ix m
onth
s an
d un
der)
, as
rate
s ro
se a
cros
s th
e cu
rve.
Whi
le
the
rate
incr
ease
was
less
pro
noun
ced
for l
onge
r mat
uriti
es, t
heir
exte
nded
du
ratio
ns —
and
acc
ompa
nyin
g se
nsiti
vity
to c
hang
es in
rate
s —
cau
sed
thei
r per
form
ance
to tr
ail t
he g
reat
est.
• N
on-c
alla
ble
fede
ral a
genc
y se
curit
ies
perfo
rmed
in li
ne w
ith c
ompa
rabl
e m
atur
ity T
reas
urie
s; c
alla
ble
secu
ritie
s m
odes
tly o
utpe
rform
ed a
s th
eir
incr
emen
tal y
ield
hel
ped
as ra
tes
rose
.•
Cor
pora
te y
ield
spr
eads
reve
rsed
the
prio
r qua
rter’s
wid
enin
g, w
hich
hel
ped
the
sect
or to
out
perfo
rm g
over
nmen
t-rel
ated
sec
tors
; how
ever
, abs
olut
e re
turn
was
stil
l neg
ativ
e. A
-rat
ed is
suer
s w
ere
the
best
-per
form
ing
qual
ity
cate
gory
.•
Mor
tgag
e-ba
cked
sec
uriti
es (M
BS
) wer
e am
ong
the
stro
nges
t-per
form
ing
sect
ors
in th
e fo
urth
qua
rter,
aide
d by
slo
wly
risi
ng lo
ng-te
rm ra
tes,
whi
ch
help
ed to
slo
w p
repa
ymen
ts; t
his
was
par
ticul
arly
true
for h
ighe
r cou
pon
issu
es. M
BS
join
ed m
unic
ipal
s as
the
lone
sec
tors
to p
rodu
ce p
ositi
ve
perfo
rman
ce fo
r the
qua
rter.
Four
th Q
uart
er 2
015
Secti
on
A-1
60
© 2
016
PFM
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t LLC
Labo
r Mar
ket
Sep
2015
Dec
201
4
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
Dec
'15
5.0%
5.1%
5.6%
Cha
nge
In N
on-F
arm
Pay
rolls
Dec
'15
292,
000
145,
000
329,
000
Ave
rage
Hou
rly E
arni
ngs
(YoY
)D
ec'1
52.
5%2.
3%1.
8%
Per
sona
l Inc
ome
(YoY
)N
ov'1
54.
4%4.
6%5.
2%
Initi
al J
oble
ss C
laim
s (w
eek)
1/1/
1627
7,00
027
6,00
029
3,00
0
Gro
wth
Rea
l GD
P (Q
oQ S
AA
R)
2015
Q3
2.0%
3.9%
4.3%
GD
P P
erso
nal C
onsu
mpt
ion
(QoQ
SA
AR
)20
15Q
33.
0%3.
6%3.
5%
Ret
ail S
ales
(YoY
)N
ov'1
51.
4%2.
2%3.
3%
ISM
Man
ufac
turin
g S
urve
y (m
onth
)D
ec'1
548
.250
.255
.1
Exi
stin
g H
ome
Sal
es S
AA
R (m
onth
)N
ov'1
54.
76 m
il.5.
55 m
il.5.
07 m
il.
Infla
tion
/ Pric
es
Per
sona
l Con
sum
ptio
n E
xpen
ditu
res
(YoY
)N
ov'1
50.
4%0.
2%0.
8%
Con
sum
er P
rice
Inde
x (Y
oY)
Nov
'15
0.5%
0.0%
0.8%
Con
sum
er P
rice
Inde
x C
ore
(YoY
)N
ov'1
52.
0%1.
9%1.
6%
Cru
de O
il Fu
ture
s (W
TI, p
er b
arre
l)D
ec 3
1$3
7.04
$45.
09$5
3.27
Gol
d Fu
ture
s (o
z.)
Dec
31
$1,0
60$1
,116
$1,1
84
1. D
ata
as o
f Sec
ond
Qua
rter 2
015
2. D
ata
as o
f Thi
rd Q
uarte
r 201
4
Not
e: Y
oY =
yea
r ove
r yea
r, Q
oQ =
qua
rter o
ver q
uarte
r, S
AA
R =
sea
sona
lly a
djus
ted
annu
al ra
te, W
TI =
Wes
t Tex
as In
term
edia
te c
rude
oil
Late
st
050K
100K
150K
200K
250K
300K
350K
400K
2%4%6%8%10% 12
/31/
126/
30/1
312
/31/
136/
30/1
412
/31/
146/
30/1
512
/31/
15
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(left)
vs.
Cha
nge
in N
onfa
rm P
ayro
lls (r
ight
)
Cha
nge
In N
on-F
arm
Pay
rolls
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
-2%0%2%4%6%
9/30
/12
3/31
/13
9/30
/13
3/31
/14
9/30
/14
3/31
/15
9/30
/15
Real
GDP
(Q
oQ)
-1%0%1%2%3%
12/3
1/12
6/30
/13
12/3
1/13
6/30
/14
12/3
1/14
6/30
/15
Con
sum
er P
rice
Inde
x
CPI
(YoY
)C
ore
CPI
(YoY
)
2 2
1 1
Econ
omic
Sna
psho
t
Sou
rce:
Blo
ombe
rg
Secti
on
A-2
61
© 2
016
PFM
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t LLC
Sou
rce:
Blo
ombe
rg
Inte
rest
Rat
e O
verv
iew
U.S
. Tre
asur
y N
ote
Yiel
dsU
.S. T
reas
ury
Yiel
d C
urve
U.S
. Tre
asur
y Yi
elds
Yiel
d C
urve
s as
of 9
/30/
15
0.0%
0.5%
1.0%
1.5%
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
9/30
/15
10/3
1/15
11/3
0/15
12/3
1/15
Yield
2-Y
ear
5-Y
ear
10-Y
ear
-1%0%1%2%3%4%
3-mo1-yr2-yr3-yr
5-yr
7-yr
10-yr
30-yr
Yield
Mat
urity
Dec
embe
r 31,
201
5Se
ptem
ber 3
0, 2
015
Dec
embe
r 31,
201
4
Mat
urity
12/3
1/15
9/30
/15
Cha
nge
over
Q
uart
er12
/31/
14C
hang
e ov
er Y
ear
3-m
onth
0.17
%(0
.02%
)0.
19%
0.04
%0.
13%
1-ye
ar0.
60%
0.31
%0.
29%
0.22
%0.
38%
2-ye
ar1.
05%
0.63
%0.
42%
0.67
%0.
38%
5-ye
ar1.
76%
1.36
%0.
40%
1.65
%0.
11%
10-y
ear
2.27
%2.
04%
0.23
%2.
17%
0.10
%
30-y
ear
3.02
%2.
85%
0.17
%2.
75%
0.27
%
0%1%2%3%4%5%
3-mo1-yr2-yr3-yr
5-yr
7-yr
10-yr
25-yr
30-yr
Yield
Mat
urity
U.S
. Tre
asur
yFe
dera
l Age
ncy
Indu
stria
l Cor
pora
tes,
A R
ated
Secti
on
A-3
62
© 2
016
PFM
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t LLCS
ourc
e: B
ofA
Mer
rill L
ynch
Indi
ces
Dura
tion
Yiel
d3
Mon
th1
Year
3 Ye
ars
1-3
Year
Indi
ces
U.S.
Tre
asur
y1.
871.
06%
(0.4
4%)
0.54
%0.
51%
Fede
ral A
genc
y1.
731.
14%
(0.3
7%)
0.69
%0.
61%
U.S.
Cor
pora
tes,
A-A
AA ra
ted
1.90
1.82
%(0
.05%
)1.
16%
1.22
%
Agen
cy M
BS (0
to
3 ye
ars)
1.89
1.46
%0.
98%
1.68
%1.
20%
Mun
icip
als
1.84
0.96
%(0
.08%
)0.
76%
0.85
%
1-5
Year
Indi
ces
U.S.
Tre
asur
y2.
701.
29%
(0.6
6%)
0.98
%0.
67%
Fede
ral A
genc
y2.
201.
31%
(0.4
9%)
0.97
%0.
76%
U.S.
Cor
pora
tes,
A-A
AA ra
ted
2.71
2.13
%(0
.16%
)1.
52%
1.59
%
Agen
cy M
BS (0
to
5 ye
ars)
3.35
2.23
%0.
16%
1.22
%1.
69%
Mun
icip
als
2.52
1.15
%0.
08%
1.20
%1.
24%
Mas
ter I
ndic
es (M
atur
ities
1 Y
ear o
r Gre
ater
)U.
S. T
reas
ury
6.19
1.77
%(0
.93%
)0.
83%
1.09
%
Fede
ral A
genc
y3.
751.
69%
(0.6
5%)
0.99
%1.
05%
U.S.
Cor
pora
tes,
A-A
AA ra
ted
6.64
3.08
%(0
.09%
)0.
67%
1.97
%
Agen
cy M
BS (0
to 3
0 ye
ars)
4.53
2.63
%(0
.06%
)1.
46%
2.00
%
Mun
icip
als
6.74
2.34
%1.
72%
3.55
%3.
35%
Ret
urns
for p
erio
ds g
reat
er th
an o
ne y
ear a
re a
nnua
lized
Retu
rns
for P
erio
ds e
nded
12/
31/2
015
As o
f 12/
31/2
015
Bof
A M
erril
l Lyn
ch In
dex
Ret
urns
Secti
on
A-4
63
© 2
016
PFM
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t LLC
Disc
losu
res
The
view
s ex
pres
sed
with
in th
is m
ater
ial c
onst
itute
the
pers
pect
ive
and
judg
men
t of P
FM A
sset
Man
agem
ent L
LC (P
FMA
M) a
t the
tim
e of
dis
tribu
tion
and
are
subj
ect t
o ch
ange
. Inf
orm
atio
n is
obt
aine
d fro
m s
ourc
es g
ener
ally
bel
ieve
d to
be
relia
ble
and
avai
labl
e to
the
publ
ic; h
owev
er, P
FMA
M c
anno
t gua
rant
ee it
s ac
cura
cy, c
ompl
eten
ess,
or
sui
tabi
lity.
Thi
s m
ater
ial i
s fo
r gen
eral
info
rmat
ion
purp
oses
onl
y an
d is
not
inte
nded
to p
rovi
de s
peci
fic a
dvic
e or
reco
mm
enda
tion.
The
info
rmat
ion
cont
aine
d in
this
re
port
is n
ot a
n of
fer t
o pu
rcha
se o
r sel
l any
sec
uriti
es. P
FMA
M is
regi
ster
ed w
ith th
e S
ecur
ities
and
Exc
hang
e C
omm
issi
on u
nder
the
Inve
stm
ent A
dvis
ers
Act
of 1
940.
P
FMA
M’s
clie
nts
are
stat
e an
d lo
cal g
over
nmen
ts, n
on-p
rofit
cor
pora
tions
, pen
sion
fund
s, a
nd s
imila
r ins
titut
iona
l inv
esto
rs. w
ww
.pfm
.com
© 2
016
PFM
Ass
et M
anag
emen
t LLC
. Fur
ther
dis
tribu
tion
is n
ot p
erm
itted
with
out p
rior w
ritte
n co
nsen
t.
Secti
on
A-5
64
•A
fter b
eing
stu
ck n
ear 0
% fo
r 7 y
ears
, the
Fed
eral
Ope
n M
arke
t Com
mitt
ee ra
ised
the
fed
fund
s ra
te in
Dec
embe
r.
•A
defe
nsiv
e du
ratio
n bi
as fo
r mos
t of t
he q
uarte
r miti
gate
d ne
gativ
e im
pact
s of
risi
ng ra
tes
on th
e m
arke
t val
ue o
f the
C
ity’s
por
tfolio
and
aid
ed th
e C
ity’s
per
form
ance
rela
tive
to th
e be
nchm
ark.
–
Late
r in
the
quar
ter,
as ra
tes
hit m
ulti-
year
hig
hs, w
e to
ok a
dvan
tage
of h
ighe
r yie
lds
and
exte
nded
the
dura
tion
of th
e po
rtfol
io.
•Th
e yi
eld
rela
tions
hip
betw
een
U.S
. Tre
asur
y an
d fe
dera
l age
ncy
secu
ritie
s re
mai
ned
stab
le th
roug
hout
the
four
th
quar
ter.
–
Our
rela
tive
valu
e an
alys
is o
f the
se s
ecto
rs c
ontin
ued
to fa
vor i
nves
tmen
ts in
U.S
. Tre
asur
ies.
–
As
fede
ral a
genc
y sp
read
s na
rrow
ed, w
e sw
appe
d fe
dera
l age
ncy
secu
ritie
s fo
r Tre
asur
y se
curit
ies
with
gr
eate
r ret
urn
pote
ntia
l.
Po
rtfo
lio
Recap
fo
r Q
uart
er
En
ded
Decem
ber
31,
2015
Se
cti
on
B-1
©
20
15
PF
M A
ss
et
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
LL
C
65
•Th
e po
rtfol
io c
ontin
ues
to h
ave
a hi
gher
retu
rn th
an th
e be
nchm
ark
sinc
e in
cept
ion.
To
tal
Retu
rn
To
tal R
etu
rns
for p
erio
ds e
ndin
g D
ecem
ber 3
1, 2
015
Du
rati
on
(ye
ars
)
Past
Qu
art
er
Past
Ye
ar
Pa
st
3
Ye
ars
Pa
st
5
Ye
ars
Sin
ce
Inc
ep
tio
n
Cit
y o
f C
oro
na
do
1
.71
-0
.39%
0.5
1%
0.5
1%
0.7
4%
2.4
9%
Ban
k of
Am
eric
a M
erril
l Lyn
ch
1-3
Year
U.S
. Tre
asur
y In
dex
1.80
-0
.44%
0.
54%
0.
51%
0.
70%
2.
35%
•P
erfo
rman
ce o
n tra
de-d
ate
basi
s, g
ross
(i.e
., be
fore
fees
), in
acc
orda
nce
with
the
CFA
Inst
itute
’s G
loba
l Inv
estm
ent P
erfo
rman
ce S
tand
ards
(GIP
S).
•B
ank
of A
mer
ica
Mer
rill L
ynch
Indi
ces
prov
ided
by
Blo
ombe
rg F
inan
cial
Mar
kets
. •
Exc
lude
s LA
IF in
per
form
ance
and
dur
atio
n co
mpu
tatio
ns.
•Q
uarte
rly re
turn
s ar
e pr
esen
ted
on a
n un
annu
aliz
ed b
asis
. Per
form
ance
num
bers
for p
erio
ds g
reat
er th
an o
ne y
ear a
re p
rese
nted
on
an a
nnua
lized
bas
is.
•In
cept
ion
date
is D
ecem
ber 3
1, 2
004.
Se
cti
on
B-2
©
20
15
PF
M A
ss
et
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
LL
C
66
Po
rtfo
lio
Co
mp
osi
tio
n
Se
cu
rity
Typ
e
Ma
rket
Va
lue
as
of
De
ce
mb
er
31
, 2
01
5
Pe
rce
nta
ge
of
Po
rtfo
lio
% C
ha
ng
e v
s
9/3
0/1
5
Pe
rmit
ted
by P
oli
cy
In
Co
mp
lia
nc
e
U.S
. T
rea
su
ry*
$4
0,9
24
,719
44%
+
7%
10
0%
Fe
de
ral A
ge
nc
ies
* $
16
,91
4,5
91
18%
-5
%
100%
LA
IF
$3
5,3
99
,309
38%
-2
%
$50
Mill
ion
To
tals
$
93
,23
8,6
19
100%
•E
nd o
f qua
rter t
rade
-dat
e m
arke
t val
ues
of p
ortfo
lio h
oldi
ngs
incl
ude
accr
ued
inte
rest
.
•Th
e C
ity’s
por
tfolio
is in
com
plia
nce
with
the
Cal
iforn
ia G
over
nmen
t Cod
e an
d th
e C
ity’s
Inve
stm
ent P
olic
y.
Se
cti
on
B-3
©
20
15
PF
M A
ss
et
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
LL
C
67
Issu
er
Dis
trib
uti
on
an
d C
red
it Q
uali
ty
•A
s of
Dec
embe
r 31,
201
5 •
Rat
ings
by
Sta
ndar
d &
Poo
r’s Is
su
er
Dis
trib
uti
on
C
red
it Q
ua
lity
•Th
e C
ity’s
por
tfolio
is c
ompo
sed
of h
igh-
qual
ity s
ecur
ities
.
Se
cti
on
B-4
©
20
15
PF
M A
ss
et
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
LL
C
U.S
. Tr
easu
ry
44%
FHLB
8%
FH
LMC
7%
FNM
A
3%
LAIF
38
%
AA
62
%
Not
R
ated
(L
AIF
) 38
%
68
•To
cap
italiz
e on
risi
ng y
ield
s, a
s ra
tes
rose
thro
ugho
ut th
e qu
arte
r we
stra
tegi
cally
ext
end
portf
olio
dur
atio
n by
sel
ling
secu
ritie
s in
the
6- to
12-
mon
th ra
nge
and
rein
vest
ing
in a
com
bina
tion
of fe
dera
l age
ncy
and
U.S
. Tre
asur
y se
curit
ies
in th
e 2-
to 3
.5-y
ear r
ange
.
Matu
rity
Dis
trib
uti
on
•A
s of
Dec
embe
r 31,
201
5 •
Cal
labl
e se
curit
ies
in th
e po
rtfol
io a
re in
clud
ed in
the
mat
urity
dis
tribu
tion
anal
ysis
to th
eir s
tate
d m
atur
ity d
ate,
alth
ough
they
may
be
calle
d pr
ior t
o m
atur
ity.
Se
cti
on
B-5
©
20
15
PF
M A
ss
et
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
LL
C
40%
11%
27%
22%
0%
0%
0%
38%
18%
14
%
28%
2%
0%
0%
0%10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
Und
er 6
Mon
ths
6 - 1
2 M
onth
s1
- 2 Y
ears
2 - 3
Yea
rs3
- 4 Y
ears
4 - 5
Yea
rs5
Yea
rs a
ndO
ver
Percentage of Total Portfolio
Sep
tem
ber 3
0, 2
015
Dec
embe
r 31,
201
5
69
Cu
rren
t S
trate
gy
•W
e m
aint
ain
the
outlo
ok th
at th
e ec
onom
y w
ill c
ontin
ue to
exp
and
at a
mod
erat
e pa
ce in
the
inte
rmed
iate
term
. We
will
con
tinue
to m
onito
r any
spi
llove
r effe
ct th
at m
odes
t glo
bal g
row
th a
nd m
uted
infla
tion
may
hav
e on
the
U.S
. ec
onom
y.
•
Rec
ent F
OM
C p
roje
ctio
ns in
dica
te th
at C
omm
ittee
mem
bers
ant
icip
ate
that
thre
e or
four
rate
hik
es m
ay b
e ap
prop
riate
in 2
016.
–
We
belie
ve th
at s
hort-
term
yie
lds
will
tren
d on
ly m
odes
tly h
ighe
r in
the
near
-term
. –
We
expe
ct lo
ng-te
rm ra
tes
to re
mai
n w
ithin
mod
est r
ange
s, re
sulti
ng in
furth
er fl
atte
ning
of t
he y
ield
cur
ve.
•
Giv
en th
e lo
w li
kelih
ood
that
rate
s w
ill m
ove
sign
ifica
ntly
hig
her i
n th
e ne
ar-te
rm, w
e st
arte
d th
e ne
w q
uarte
r with
a
portf
olio
dur
atio
n po
sitio
n cl
oser
to, b
ut m
oder
atel
y sh
orte
r tha
n, th
at o
f the
City
’s b
ench
mar
k.
•
We
will
con
tinue
to m
onito
r the
yie
ld re
latio
nshi
p be
twee
n fe
dera
l age
ncy
and
Trea
sury
sec
uriti
es, l
ooki
ng to
add
fe
dera
l age
ncie
s w
hen
thei
r add
ition
al y
ield
s ov
er T
reas
urie
s of
fer v
alue
.
Se
cti
on
B-6
©
20
15
PF
M A
ss
et
Ma
na
ge
me
nt
LL
C
70
For
the M
onth
Endin
g D
ece
mb
er
31
, 2
01
5M
an
ag
ed
Acco
un
t D
eta
il o
f S
ecu
riti
es H
eld
CIT
Y O
F C
ORO
NAD
O
Da
ted
Da
te/C
ou
po
n/M
atu
rity
CU
SIP
Ra
tin
gR
ati
ng
Da
teD
ate
Co
st
at
Co
st
Inte
rest
Co
st
Va
lue
Se
cu
rity
Typ
e/D
escri
pti
on
S&
PM
oo
dy's
Ori
gin
al
YT
MA
ccru
ed
Am
ort
ize
dM
ark
et
Tra
de
Se
ttle
Pa
r
U.S
. T
rea
su
ry B
on
d /
No
te
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
11/3
0/2
011 0
.875%
11/3
0/2
016
3,3
01,9
33.8
0
3,3
03,1
38.8
3
2,5
24.5
9
3,3
09,7
96.8
8
01/1
6/1
401/1
5/1
4Aaa
AA+
3,3
00,0
00.0
0
912828RU
60.7
7
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
01/3
1/2
012 0
.875%
01/3
1/2
017
2,5
00,1
95.0
0
2,5
01,0
19.8
0
9,1
54.2
1
2,5
02,3
43.7
5
07/3
1/1
407/3
0/1
4Aaa
AA+
2,5
00,0
00.0
0
912828SC5
0.8
4
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
03/3
1/2
012 1
.000%
03/3
1/2
017
3,3
05,1
54.6
0
3,3
02,7
28.1
4
8,3
85.2
5
3,3
06,5
74.2
2
03/2
1/1
403/2
0/1
4Aaa
AA+
3,3
00,0
00.0
0
912828SM
30.9
3
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
06/1
6/2
014 0
.875%
06/1
5/2
017
3,3
96,2
80.4
0
3,3
97,2
10.8
4
1,3
81.8
3
3,3
94,2
89.0
6
06/1
6/1
406/1
3/1
4Aaa
AA+
3,4
00,0
00.0
0
912828W
P1
0.9
3
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
07/3
1/2
012 0
.500%
07/3
1/2
017
2,4
81,0
55.0
0
2,4
77,9
58.1
5
5,2
30.9
8
2,4
58,4
96.0
9
07/3
1/1
407/3
0/1
4Aaa
AA+
2,5
00,0
00.0
0
912828TG
51.0
6
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
12/3
1/2
012 0
.750%
12/3
1/2
017
4,9
66,2
10.0
0
4,9
64,3
31.1
0
103.0
2
4,9
46,2
89.0
6
12/2
2/1
412/1
9/1
4Aaa
AA+
5,0
00,0
00.0
0
912828U
E8
1.1
1
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
04/0
1/2
013 0
.750%
03/3
1/2
018
4,9
55,2
75.0
0
4,9
80,1
94.3
5
9,5
28.6
9
4,9
73,6
32.8
1
03/3
1/1
503/3
0/1
5Aaa
AA+
5,0
00,0
00.0
0
912828U
U2
0.9
3
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
04/0
1/2
013 0
.750%
03/3
1/2
018
4,9
55,2
75.0
0
4,9
86,2
86.4
5
9,5
28.6
9
4,9
82,2
26.5
6
04/3
0/1
504/2
8/1
5Aaa
AA+
5,0
00,0
00.0
0
912828U
U2
0.8
7
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
04/3
0/2
013 0
.625%
04/3
0/2
018
3,0
60,1
58.8
0
3,0
69,0
83.6
7
3,3
00.1
4
3,0
61,7
34.3
8
06/0
9/1
506/0
8/1
5Aaa
AA+
3,1
00,0
00.0
0
912828U
Z1
1.0
6
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
08/3
1/2
011 1
.500%
08/3
1/2
018
2,7
17,9
30.7
0
2,7
31,3
02.3
2
13,6
85.4
4
2,7
35,1
21.0
9
09/0
3/1
509/0
1/1
5Aaa
AA+
2,7
00,0
00.0
0
912828RE2
1.0
6
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
10/3
1/2
013 1
.250%
10/3
1/2
018
2,9
55,8
38.2
4
2,9
67,4
83.9
2
6,3
02.2
0
2,9
67,8
62.5
0
11/0
9/1
511/0
5/1
5Aaa
AA+
2,9
60,0
00.0
0
912828W
D8
1.1
6
US T
REASU
RY N
OTES
DTD
12/3
1/2
013 1
.500%
12/3
1/2
018
2,2
60,1
94.7
5
2,2
66,0
42.5
2
92.7
2
2,2
66,4
35.5
5
12/0
4/1
512/0
2/1
5Aaa
AA+
2,2
50,0
00.0
0
912828A75
1.2
6
69
,21
7.7
6
40
,85
5,5
01
.29
4
0,9
46
,78
0.0
9
0.9
9
40
,90
4,8
01
.95
4
1,0
10
,00
0.0
0
Se
cu
rity
Typ
e S
ub
-To
tal
Fe
de
ral
Ag
en
cy B
on
d /
No
te
FAN
NIE
MAE G
LOBAL
NO
TES
DTD
05/1
7/2
013 0
.375%
07/0
5/2
016
699,1
55.8
0
698,6
92.9
3
1,2
83.3
3
692,3
98.0
0
07/0
5/1
307/0
3/1
3Aaa
AA+
700,0
00.0
0
3135G
0XP3
0.7
4
71
For
the M
onth
Endin
g D
ece
mb
er
31
, 2
01
5M
an
ag
ed
Acco
un
t D
eta
il o
f S
ecu
riti
es H
eld
CIT
Y O
F C
ORO
NAD
O
Da
ted
Da
te/C
ou
po
n/M
atu
rity
CU
SIP
Ra
tin
gR
ati
ng
Da
teD
ate
Co
st
at
Co
st
Inte
rest
Co
st
Va
lue
Se
cu
rity
Typ
e/D
escri
pti
on
S&
PM
oo
dy's
Ori
gin
al
YT
MA
ccru
ed
Am
ort
ize
dM
ark
et
Tra
de
Se
ttle
Pa
r
Fe
de
ral
Ag
en
cy B
on
d /
No
te
FH
LB N
OTES
DTD
08/0
7/2
014 0
.500%
09/2
8/2
016
1,2
47,8
06.2
5
1,2
49,1
54.5
1
1,6
14.5
8
1,2
47,6
12.5
0
08/2
1/1
408/2
0/1
4Aaa
AA+
1,2
50,0
00.0
0
3130A2T97
0.5
9
FH
LB N
OTES
DTD
08/0
7/2
014 0
.500%
09/2
8/2
016
1,2
62,7
79.9
3
1,2
63,1
74.0
2
1,6
33.9
6
1,2
60,0
28.5
5
09/1
8/1
409/1
7/1
4Aaa
AA+
1,2
65,0
00.0
0
3130A2T97
0.7
0
FH
LMC N
OTES
DTD
08/1
6/2
013 0
.875%
10/1
4/2
016
4,7
53,5
10.2
5
4,7
59,6
21.8
9
8,8
89.7
6
4,7
85,6
72.5
0
11/0
8/1
311/0
7/1
3Aaa
AA+
4,7
50,0
00.0
0
3137EAD
S5
0.6
2
FH
LB G
LOBAL
BO
ND
S
DTD
12/0
1/2
006 4
.750%
12/1
6/2
016
5,1
85,1
00.0
0
5,1
96,9
25.3
0
9,8
95.8
3
5,3
29,2
50.0
0
05/0
8/1
505/0
7/1
5Aaa
AA+
5,0
00,0
00.0
0
3133XH
ZK1
0.6
2
FRED
DIE
MAC G
LOBAL
NO
TES
DTD
06/2
5/2
012 1
.000%
07/2
8/2
017
1,2
47,9
21.2
5
1,2
50,2
09.7
8
5,3
12.5
0
1,2
50,3
86.7
8
08/2
1/1
408/2
0/1
4Aaa
AA+
1,2
50,0
00.0
0
3137EAD
J50.9
9
FN
MA B
EN
CH
MARK N
OTE
DTD
09/0
1/2
015 1
.125%
10/1
9/2
018
2,4
84,0
62.5
0
2,5
12,0
63.5
8
5,6
25.0
0
2,5
12,9
50.0
0
10/1
6/1
510/1
5/1
5Aaa
AA+
2,5
00,0
00.0
0
3135G
0E58
0.9
5
34
,25
4.9
6
16
,88
0,3
35
.98
1
6,9
29
,84
2.0
1
0.7
0
17
,07
8,2
98
.33
1
6,7
15
,00
0.0
0
Se
cu
rity
Typ
e S
ub
-To
tal
57
,72
5,0
00
.00
5
7,9
83
,10
0.2
8
0.9
0
10
3,4
72
.72
5
7,8
76
,62
2.1
0
57
,73
5,8
37
.27
M
an
ag
ed
Acco
un
t S
ub
-To
tal
$5
7,7
25
,00
0.0
0
$5
7,9
83
,10
0.2
8
$1
03
,47
2.7
2
$5
7,8
76
,62
2.1
0
$5
7,7
35
,83
7.2
7
0.9
0%
$5
7,8
39
,30
9.9
9
$1
03
,47
2.7
2
To
tal
Inve
stm
en
ts
Accru
ed
In
tere
st
Se
cu
riti
es S
ub
-To
tal
72
AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT TO ATKINS FOR A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $52,500 FOR PHASE 1 OF THE DESIGN OF THE WASTEWATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Atkins for a not-to-exceed amount of $52,500 for Phase 1 of the design of the Wastewater Main Replacement Program.
FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 2015/16 Capital Improvement Program allocated $100,000 toward the design and $1,100,000 for the construction of the Wastewater Main Replacement Program (510781-9839-16017). The design fee for Phase 1 is $52,500 and it is anticipated that the fee for Phase 2, based on the findings of Phase 1, will be within the allocated budget of $100,000.
CEQA: It is anticipated that a categorical exemption will be processed for the project.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Entering into a professional services contract is an administrative decision not affecting a fundamental vested right. When an administrative decision does not affect a fundamental vested right the courts give greater deference to decision makers in administrative mandate actions. The court will inquire (a) whether the city has complied with the required procedures, and (b) whether the city’s findings, if any, are supported by substantial evidence.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: The City has utilized prequalified civil engineering firms to provide professional design services for a majority of capital improvement projects. Atkins, one of the City’s on-call consultants, has submitted a proposal for the first phase of the design for this project.
As part of the Capital Improvements Program, the City generally contracts for an annual wastewater improvement project which corrects deficiencies in the sanitary sewer system by replacing undersized and deteriorated sewer mains. Locations will be identified during the first phase of the project.
ANALYSIS: Atkins was asked to submit a proposal for civil engineering design work for this project. After a scoping meeting and negotiating fees and services to be provided, Atkins provided the City with a written proposal detailing the scope of work. The work has been separated into two phases; the first phase includes completing additional inspections of sewer mains and manholes (equal to roughly 20% of the total wastewater system), to supplement those already completed as part of the Sewer Master Plan Update, and develop recommendations for which mains to include in the project. The second phase will include creating construction documents for the mains selected to be replaced as part of the project. A proposal for the second phase will be submitted once the first phase has been completed.
03/01/16
73
5e
ALTERNATIVE: The Council may elect not to authorize the execution of a design contract at this time. Submitted by Public Services & Engineering/Odiorne Attachment: Atkins Proposal dated January 28, 2016 N:\All Departments\Staff Reports - Drafts\2016 Meetings\03-01 Meeting SR Due Feb. 18\FINAL Award of Design Contract Wastewater Main Repl.doc
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR JK JNC MLC NA EW NA NA NA CMM NA
03/01/16
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT TO ATKINS FOR A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $55,000 FOR PHASE 1 OF THE DESIGN OF THE GLORIETTA SEWER MAIN INSPECTION PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Atkins for a not-to-exceed amount of $55,000 to research and complete the first phase of design of the Glorietta Sewer Main Inspection project.
FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 2015/16 Capital Improvement Program allocated $145,000 towards inspection of the sewer main included in this project (Project Account # 510781-9888-16016). The proposed Phase 1 design fee is $55,000 and is within the total project budget for FY 2015/16.
CEQA: Categorical Exemption 15301 – Class I – Existing Facilities; Categorical Exemption 15302 – Class 2 – Replacement or Reconstruction.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Entering into a professional services contract is an administrative decision not affecting a fundamental vested right. When an administrative decision does not affect a fundamental vested right, the courts give greater deference to decision makers in administrative mandate actions. The court will inquire (a) whether the city has complied with the required procedures, and (b) whether the city’s findings, if any, are supported by substantial evidence.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: This project is an internal and external inspection of the Glorietta sewer main utility line which transports sanitary sewage from the Glorietta Bay pump station to the Transbay pump station. The results of the inspection will determine the overall condition of the pipeline, its remaining life expectancy, and whether or not repairs or rehabilitation are required at this time. Construction of one access port is anticipated to be included in the project to assist with future, more regular internal inspections of the pipe.
ANALYSIS: Atkins, an on-call design consultant for the City, was asked to submit a proposal for civil engineering design work required for this project. Atkins’ written proposal detailing their proposed scope of work is split into two phases. The first phase (addressed by this staff report) is estimated to cost a total of $54,265 and includes subsurface investigations via potholing and ground penetrating radar to determine the exact alignment of the pipe and providing a plan and profile of said alignment. Atkins will also review operational and hydraulic data of the sewer main to identify the most practical and effective pipe inspection methods. A full copy of the proposal is available for review in the Public Services and Engineering Department. Once an inspection method has been identified, Atkins may be retained to complete Phase 2 of the design to write inspection specifications and design an inspection port.
ALTERNATIVE: The Council may select another qualified firm, seek new proposals, or direct staff to not pursue the project at this time.
Submitted by Public Services & Engineering /Katzenstein
N:\All Departments\Staff Reports - Drafts\2016 Meetings\03-01 Meeting SR Due Feb. 18\FINAL Award Glorietta Sewer Main Design Inspection.docx
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR JK JNC MLC NA EW NA NA NA CMM NA
03/01/16
83
5f
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
84
AWARD OF A PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICES CONTRACT WITH PSOMAS FOR A NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $49,740 FOR THE FY 2015/16 STORM DRAIN INLET IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to execute an agreement with Psomas for a not-to-exceed amount of $49,740 for the design of the Fiscal Year 2015/16 Storm Drain Inlet Improvement project.
FISCAL IMPACT: The FY 2015/16 Capital Improvement Program allocated $50,000 towards the design of the Storm Drain Inlet Improvement Project (Account # 530783-9857-16020). Also, $200,000 is proposed for appropriation in FY 2016/17 to be used for construction of the project. An engineer’s estimate of the proposed improvements to be included in the project is not available at this time; however, it is expected that the improvements can be constructed within the allocated budget. It should be pointed out that the consultant fee is a not-to-exceed amount and any funds not expended for the design will remain available in the project account.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Entering into a professional services contract is an administrative decision not affecting a fundamental vested right. When an administrative decision does not affect a fundamental vested right the courts give greater deference to decision makers in administrative mandate actions. The court will inquire (a) whether the city has complied with the required procedures, and (b) whether the city’s findings, if any, are supported by substantial evidence.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: The Storm Drain Inlet Improvements project involves replacement of existing grate inlets, which are susceptible to clogging, with more efficient curb opening style inlets. The locations identified for grate inlet replacement are Seventh Street at G Avenue, Eighth and Tenth Streets at the F and G alleys, Soledad Place at Second Street, Ocean Boulevard at Loma Avenue, and the west end of Ocean Boulevard near NASNI Gate 5.
The City has utilized prequalified civil engineering firms to provide professional design services for a majority of capital improvement projects. Psomas is one of two on-call design firms that the City has retained to assist with the design of capital improvement projects.
ANALYSIS: Psomas was asked to submit a proposal for civil engineering design work for the Storm Drain Inlet Improvements project. A field meeting between Engineering and Public Services staff was held at the various sites so that staff could provide the Psomas design team with the scope of work being requested.
After negotiating fees and services to be provided, Psomas provided the City with a written proposal detailing the scope of work (see attachment). The scope of work includes all items requested by staff, although additional support not addressed in this proposal may be required during bidding and construction of the project.
ALTERNATIVE: The Council could chose to not authorize the execution of a design contract at this time.
Submitted by Public Services & Engineering/Johnson Attachment: Psomas Proposal dated January 26, 2016
N:\All Departments\Staff Reports - Drafts\2016 Meetings\03-01 Meeting SR Due Feb. 18\Storm Drain Inlets award of design contract.docCM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR JK JNC MLC NA EW NA NA NA CMM NA
03/01/16
85
5g
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
86
87
88
89
90
91
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
92
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO AUTHORIZING THE RECEIPT AND APPROPRIATION OF $24,197 IN FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE FISCAL YEAR 2014-2015 STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM (SHSP) THROUGH THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
RECOMMENDATION: Approve “A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Coronado Authorizing the Receipt and Appropriation of $24,197 in funds provided by the FY 2015 State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) through the County of San Diego.”
FISCAL IMPACT: San Diego County has been allocated FY 2015 State Homeland Security grant funds. The City of Coronado’s eligibility for these grant funds is $24,197. The expenditure and reimbursement revenue will be recorded to the City’s Federal Grant Fund 240 and subject to Federal single audit reporting requirements. These funds must be spent by June 30, 2017.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Approval of receipt of a grant is a legislative action. Legislative actions tend to express a public purpose and make provisions for the ways and means of accomplishing the purpose. Legislative actions involved the exercise of discretion governed by considerations of public welfare, in which case the City Council is deemed to have “paramount authority” in such decisions.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the State of California has been awarded grant funding from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The State, in turn, awards a portion of this funding to each county. Local law enforcement agencies may apply through the county for these funds.
In prior years, the Fire Department has used a portion of the funds to replace and update their portable radios. The Police Department has used prior funds for a variety of projects, including security cameras and portable radio upgrades.
ANALYSIS: These funds are to address emergency response needs. The Governor’s Office of Homeland Security has approved the purchase of digital portable radios for Fire Services to enhance protection of critical infrastructure and key resources. These new radios will improve interoperability between the City and other agencies in the County and throughout the southern California region for communication during critical incidents. The Governor’s Office of Homeland Security has also approved the purchase of upgraded mobile camera trailer equipment which includes computer hardware (2) and modems (2) including wiring and software licenses (4). The City of Coronado hosts several civic events each year and the upgraded equipment for the portable camera trailers would allow the Police Department to continue to enhance security around these events by recording and monitoring live camera feeds of the events.
ALTERNATIVE: The City Council may choose to not accept the grant funds or direct that the grant funds be used to purchase other equipment.
Submitted by Police Department/Froomin Attachment: Resolution
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR JK JNC MLC NA NA MB NA JF NA NA
03/01/16
93
5h
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
94
RESOLUTION NO. ___________
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO AUTHORIZING THE RECEIPT AND APPROPRIATION OF $24,197 IN FUNDS PROVIDED BY THE FY 2015 STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM
(SHSP) THROUGH THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
WHEREAS, the State Homeland Security Program (SHSP) provides grant funds to local governments to support terrorism preparedness by building or enhancing capabilities that relate to the prevention of, protection from, or response to and recovery from terrorism; and
WHEREAS, the City of Coronado Police and Fire Departments are eligible to receive a
portion of these grant funds provided by the State Homeland Security Program through the County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services and the City Council is authorized to approve and accept the receipt of grant funds, when the funds are made available.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Coronado, California, that the City Council approves and authorizes the receipt and appropriation of $24,197 in grant funds provided by the State Homeland Security Program administered through the County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these funds, which must be spent by June 30, 2017, be budgeted for expenditure from the Federal Grants Fund 240 in FY 2015-16.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Coronado this ____day of _______ 2016.
AYES: NAYS: ABSTAIN: ABSENT:
Casey Tanaka, Mayor of the City of Coronado, California Attest: Mary L. Clifford, CMC City Clerk
03/01/16
95
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
96
RECEIVE THE BICYCLE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2015
ISSUE: The Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) is required to submit an annual report to the City Council pursuant to Resolution No. 8496, which established the committee.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Bicycle Advisory Committee Annual Report for 2015.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Review and direction related to a report is a policy matter and an advisory action reflective of the Council’s legislative role. Therefore a person that would challenge such a legislative action must prove that the decision was “arbitrary, capricious, entirely lacking in evidentiary support, or unlawfully or procedurally unfair” per the California court decision of Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Bd. of Education [(1982) 32 Cal. 3d 779, 786].
CEQA: Not applicable.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: The Bicycle Advisory Committee was established by City Council Resolution No. 8496 on August 16, 2011, in an effort to engage with the City’s bicycle community and to receive input on bicycle-related matters within Coronado. One of the responsibilities assigned by the Council to the BAC was to prepare an annual report each year, listing progress made by the BAC and the City on implementing the improvements and programs identified in the Bicycle Master Plan and other information applicable to bicycling in the City.
ANALYSIS: The annual report was written by the BAC Committee Chair for 2015 and describes efforts made by the BAC and staff during 2015. The report was reviewed and approved by the BAC on January 4, 2016.
ALTERNATIVE: The Council could choose not to accept the report and instead ask the BAC to include information on specific items/questions raised by the Council.
Submitted by Public Services and Engineering/VanZerr Attachment: Bicycle Advisory Committee Annual Report 2015
N:\All Departments\Staff Reports - Drafts\2016 Meetings\03-01 Meeting SR Due Feb. 18\BAC Annual Report Staff Report.doc
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR NA JNC MLC NA EW NA NA NA CMM NA
03/01/16
97
5i
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
ACCEPT THE CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2015 AND WORK PLAN FOR 2016
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Cultural Arts Commission's Annual Report for 2015 and Work Plan for 2016.
FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no direct fiscal impact on the City by the acceptance and approval of this report and related work plan.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Whether to support the concept of providing art related activities is an administrative decision not affecting a fundamental vested right. When an administrative decision does not affect a fundamental vested right the courts give greater deference to decision makers in administrative mandate actions. The court will inquire (a) whether the city has complied with the required procedures, and (b) whether the city's findings, if any, (although not required) are supported by substantial evidence.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: The Cultural Arts Commission (CAC) was established by City Council Resolution 8507 on September 26, 2011. The Resolution calls for the submission by the CAC to the City Council of a "State of the Arts in Coronado" annual report including its activities and its work plan for the subsequent year. The Cultural Arts Commission 2015 Report is submitted in order to fulfill that charge.
ANALYSIS: The Cultural Arts Commission 2015 Report outlines the accomplishments of the CAC during the fourth year of its existence. Outlined are the general achievements of the CAC as well as the accomplishments of the seven program areas consisting of: Arts Education; Arts Partners & Advocacy; Communications: PR & Media; Literary Arts; Public Art; Special Events and Development; and Visual Arts & Film. The Council received a report at the January 19, 2016 meeting on the activities held by the CAC in celebration of the 125th anniversary since the incorporation of the City of Coronado.
The report also outlines the proposed 2016 Work Plan, or the future projects and programs of the CAC for the next year. These projects are arranged by general CAC goals as well as goals for the seven established program areas, with a change in name and focus for Visual Arts.
The number one goal of the Commission for 2016 is to develop and launch the Cultural Compass, a five-year strategic plan for the arts, by September 2016. In addition, the CAC will support the creation of arts programming for viewing on Coronado TV as well as continue to promote Coronado as an “Arts Destination.” Exciting new programs are in the works for 2016, including the launch of a community-wide read program modeled on the ALA One Book Program; the possible acceptance and the installation of the USN SEALs “Naked Warrior” statue commemorating the unique relationship between the USN SEALS and Coronado; and the updating of the Economic Impact Report from 2013.
3/01/16
105
5j
Several projects are continuations of events and projects originating in previous years; examples include: mounting rotating exhibitions in the Coronado Community Center C3 Gallery as well as hosting a booth at the Coronado Flower Show with a theme of “Florals by Locals”; sponsoring the 3rd Annual Coronado Writers’ Workshop on October 15, 2016; continued collaboration with City planning teams to facilitate public art in the John D. Spreckels Center and the Spreckels Park Restroom Project; and continued support of our many Arts Partners including sponsoring the 10th Anniversary Musica Vitale Concert on June 17, 2016 and assisting the Coronado Island Film Festival (CIFF) as they build on the success of their inaugural event for their second festival in 2017. ALTERNATIVE: The City Council could decide not to accept the Cultural Arts Commission Annual Report and Work Plan, or to refer it back to the Cultural Arts Commission with changes to be made to the submitted document. Submitted by the Contract Arts Administrator Kelly Purvis/Office of the City Manager Attachment: 2015 Annual Report and 2016 Work Plan
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR N/A JNC MLC N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A NA N/A
3/01/16
106
CULTURAL ARTS COMMISION 2015 ANNUAL REPORT & 2016 WORK PLAN
To: Coronado City Council
From: Heidi Wilson- 2015 Chair Jeff Tyler – 2016 Chair Coronado Cultural Arts Commission
Date: March 1, 2016
Subject: 2015 Annual Report to City Council and 2016 Work Plan The Coronado Cultural Arts Commission (CAC) serves as a leading voice for the arts in Coronado through program development, creative initiatives, and dynamic alliances. Established in 2011 by City Council Resolution #8507, the Commission is comprised of seven volunteer Commissioners representing seven program areas: Arts Education, Arts Partners and Advocacy, Communication: Public Relations and Media, Special Events and Development, Literary Arts, Public Art, and Visual Arts and Film. The CAC serves the Coronado community as an umbrella organization and voice for the arts through support, enrichment, and development of a thriving arts environment. The CAC serves and partners with local artists and cultural arts organizations to further develop a vibrant and cohesive arts community, strengthen arts education, enhance cultural tourism and economic development, and enrich life in Coronado for citizens and visitors. The Commission meets on the first Thursday of each month at 4:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers at City Hall. The meetings are open to the public. Agendas and minutes of previous meetings are
Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 1 of 9
107
posted and available on the City’s website: www.coronado.ca.us, and may be reviewed at City Hall, 1825 Strand Way, Coronado, CA 92118 and also the Coronado Public Library. Once again, the CAC had an extremely productive and successful year leading the community in a year-long celebration of the City’s 125th year and collaborating with businesses, organizations and volunteers. There were concerts, movies, lectures, exhibitions, home tours, parades, performances, plays, family festivals, lawn bowling and a flower show all built on the theme of celebrating all that is special about Coronado and 125 Unforgettable Years – One Unforgettable Place. Additionally, our specific program areas contributed in other ways to continue the Commission’s work of supporting and building arts and culture in Coronado, and we opened the City’s first public art gallery – C3 Gallery at the Coronado Community Center. 2015 COMMISSION WORK Election of Officers and Commission Changes At the January 15, 2015 CAC meeting, Commissioner Heidi Wilson was elected to serve as
the Commission’s Chair and Commissioner Doug Metz as Vice-Chair. Commissioner Amy Steward resigned in August and Commissioners Susan Enowitz, Sondi
Arndt, and Kari Kovach elected not to serve out their terms beyond Dec. 31, 2015. Additionally, Commissioner Heidi Wilson’s term expired on Dec. 31, 2015
On September 15, 2015, the City Council appointed Brenda Jo Robyn to a Commission term ending December 13, 2017 and on December 1, 2015 Peggy Lindquist and Nancy Swanson were appointed to three year terms and Frances Howdyshell to a one-year term which will end December 31 of their respective terms. There is currently one opening on the CAC which is expected to be filled by the Council in early 2016.
Coronado Celebrates 125 (CC125) Over the course of 2015, the CAC planned and executed the following events: Florals by Locals – An exhibition of local artists featuring floral themed art at the Coronado
Flower Show. Wings, Water and Wheels 125 years of Coronado Transportation– Student art Exhibition
at the Emerald C Gallery Steve Martini Book Signing Princess Bride Movie on the Bay* Some Like it Hot Movie on the Bay* Family Festival in the Cays and FROZEN Movie on the Bay* Sandlot Movie on the Bay Coronado Promenade Concert Kick-off for 125-day countdown to December 11 Monsters Inc. Movie on the Bay* Unforgettable Evening with the San Diego Symphony Jazz on the Green in the Coronado Cays with Peter Sprague and Friends Tribute to Coronado artist Sue Tushingham McNary – Exhibition Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 2 of 9
108
Concert on the Green at the Coronado Municipal Golf course with Ron’s Garage Celebrate Oz! a family festival of music, art and fun in Spreckels Park. The Wisdom of Oz – lecture by Gita Dorothy Morena, great-granddaughter of L. Frank Baum Visions of Coronado – Inaugural exhibition at the City’s new C3 Gallery Mayors’ Dinner at the Del – hosted by Coronado’s three living Mayors.
*in conjunction with the Coronado Recreation Department
We also opened the City’s first public art gallery. In addition, we collaborated with other community organizations, providing marketing and promotional services, assisting them in offering 18 other CC125 themed events. In collaboration with the Coronado Eagle & Journal we also produced an 86-page CC125 Commemorative Edition magazine, and we produced a 90-page Mayors’ Dinner Program both of which were filled with history about the City and the community.
Finally, we created and produced a number of CC125 commemorative items designed to celebrate this milestone in Coronado’s history as well as raise fun to provide free events and fund future CAC programs. CC125 median street pole banners were designed utilizing local artist’s images of Coronado. A commemorative lapel pin and a Catstudio Coronado Pillow were designed and sold with over $22,000 being generated from the pillow project. We also collaborated with local businesses Orange and Park to create a limited-edition Coronado graphic poster and University Blanket and Flag to produce a 125 Coronado Flag.
In the spring of 2015, the City Council allocated $50,000 from general funds representing the City’s contribution towards the cost of all City CC125 events and activities of the year. Utilizing the newly acquired ability to solicit sponsorships as a funding resource, the CAC used the City’s seed money as part of a funding strategy which included sponsorships, grants and community donations to fund its significant $371,000 budget for the year which included $154,000 in grants and $133,855 in sponsorships. All City-sponsored events were offered free to the community and public except for the Mayors’ Dinner at the Del - the CAC’s only designated “fundraising” event to raise funds for the work of the CAC. That event proved to be exceptionally popular with 125 tickets selling out in three days and with the support of generous contributions by both sponsors and the community along with a live auction, the CAC realized a net profit of $88,831 from this event. It truly has been one unforgettable year and the CAC would like to thank the City Council for entrusting them to plan and implement a full year of events marking this significant milestone in Coronado’s history as well as the opportunity to coordinate and collaborate with the many organizations, businesses and individuals who contributed to the success of the various events and projects honoring Coronado’s history, its accomplishments, and its citizens.
Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 3 of 9
109
2015 COMMISSION & PROGRAM AREA ACCOMPLISHMENTS COMMISSION ACCOMPLISHMENTS • Positioned Coronado as an “Arts Destination” through the actions of the Commission. • Supported various workshops, lectures and Master Class series. • Encouraged collaborations with restaurants and businesses to feature arts related events. • Supported efforts to make Channel 19 a valuable Community resource. • Encouraged the interaction of the arts and public spaces for the betterment of the Coronado
arts community and citizens. • Developed a timeline to initiate the Cultural Compass a five-year strategic plan for the arts in
2016.
Arts Education – Commissioner Sondi Arndt • Partnered with Coronado Unified School District and Sacred Heart Parish School to develop
and implement art curriculum in the third grade, Middle School and High School curriculums utilizing local mentor artists.
• Conducted and mounted a juried student exhibition celebrating 125 Years of Coronado Transportation, Wheels, Wings and Water at Emerald C Gallery in Coronado.
• Recognized student artwork at the Coronado City Council and the CUSD Board meeting. • Participated in the CUSD Strategic Planning process to implement Art in the curriculum.
Arts Partners & Advocacy – Commissioner Doug Metz • Held bi-monthly meetings of CAC Arts Partners to promote communications on planned
programs and activities of Arts Partners and to facilitate coordination and cooperation in implementing programs and activities.
• Collaborated with various Arts Partners in their events during the year. • Recruited CAC Arts Partners to take advantage of the advertising opportunities on the City of
Coronado Free Summer Shuttle. • Expanded the agenda of Arts Partners meetings to include presentations by local
professionals on subjects of interest to members, including: o Dr. Laura Dietrich, Castor Center for Non-Profit Management, University of San
Diego o Todd Little, Coronado Tourism Improvement District o Steve Johnson, eCoronado o Barbra Drizen, Start From Scratch Social Media o
Communications: PR &Media – Commissioner Kari Kovach • Consulted with Coronado Scribes and helped draft press release and marketing plan for book
launch.
Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 4 of 9
110
• Developed & executed marketing plan for 2nd Annual Writers Workshop. • Promoted more than fifteen CAC events and activities via press releases, event postings, and
social media. • Produced 3 on Thursday a weekly e-blast to 850+ subscribers, promoting Coronado’s art &
cultural events happening that weekend as well as the Village Theater movie schedule and included in the weekly City Manager update.
• Increased traffic to CoronadoARTS.com o Sessions tripled o Users tripled
• Developed street banners and coordinated local media coverage of CC125 and other Commission events.
• Recruited and registered local artists, authors and art businesses for the CoronadoARTS.com directory.
Literary Arts – Commissioner Susan Enowitz • Organized the 2nd Coronado Writers Workshop (CWW) consisting of 12 sessions with 22
presenters and keynote speaker, Ron Carlson. The event attracted over 84 participants. Sponsors were Coronado Bay Books, Coronado High School and Coronado Eagle Newspaper.
• Supported Coronado writers in posting individual profiles on Coronadoarts.com. • Partnered with Bay Books on partnership opportunities including the Steve Martini event and
the wine and cheese end-of-event reception for the 2nd Coronado Writers Workshop. • Partnered with Coronado Public Library on various partnerships including the Steve Martini
Lecture event, the Coronado Writers Workshop, the display in the library of “local authors’ books,” a local author’s book brochure, and planning of “On One Page Coronado,” a community book reading project.
• Assisted and supported the Coronado Scribes in their production and the publicity of their book Coronado On My Mind.
Public Art – Commissioner Jeff Tyler • Continued collaboration with the John D. Spreckels Center Design Team to include public art
as an integral part of the new center, featuring a “recently approved” Donor Wall Design based on use of repurposed wood from Spreckels Park trees. Also assisted with selection of existing Public Art for retention and storage.
• Participated in the final installation phase of “bicycle” style bike racks in conjunction with the Bike “Corral” Esthetics Stakeholders Team.
• Participated in the Coronado Gateway Project stakeholders meetings on this project. • Collaborated with Arts Education Working Team and Friends of the Library on the Public
Utility Box Art Project, including a shift in collaboration to Caltrans for future Public Art wrapping of Caltrans signal boxes.
Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 5 of 9
111
• Collaborated with the Spreckels Park Bathroom design team for the commissioning and installation of two additional stylized multi-flower mosaic panels.
• Opened collaboration with USN SEAL representatives of the USN SEAL Museum in Ft. Pierce, FL for the installation of a bronze “Naked Warrior” combat swimmer statue in Coronado.
Special Events & Development – Commissioner Heidi Wilson • Organized individual volunteer committees to plan and execute each CC125 event (previously
listed) which included over 200 local individuals and businesses working together over the course of the year.
• Produced the CAC fundraising event for 2015: the Mayors’ Dinner at the Del which netted over $88,000 in funds for the CAC.
Visual Arts and Film – Commissioner Brenda Jo Robyn (former Commissioner Amy Steward) Produced and mounted an exhibition Florals by Locals at the Coronado Flower Show
featuring 18 local artists and over 35 pieces of artwork. Produced a celebration and mounted an exhibition and sale of work honoring local artist Sue
Tushingham McNary. Produced an Art Under the Umbrella event in Spreckels Park in coordination with Celebrate
Oz! Weekend featuring 20+ local artists. Created and opened a public community gallery in the Coronado Community Center – C3
Gallery, comprised of 3 separate spaces to display both 2-D and 3-D work of local artists. Produced and mounted a juried art exhibition in the C3 Gallery – Visions of Coronado
featuring the work of over 23 local artists and 35 pieces of artwork. Continued sales of McNary and Rowe prints and cards to support the costs of maintaining the
Cultural Arts website CoronadoARTS.com.
Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 6 of 9
112
ADDENDUM A
2016 Cultural Arts Commission WORK PLAN 2016 COMMISSION GOALS Develop and launch the Cultural Compass, a five-year strategic plan for the arts, by
September 2016. Develop funding strategies to support the work of the Commission. Position Coronado as an “Arts Destination” through the actions of the Commission’s
Working Teams. Encourage use of public spaces for public art and venues for art and cultural events. Support workshops and lectures series through the Commission’s Working Teams. Encourage collaborations with restaurants and businesses to feature arts related activities. Support efforts to make CTV a valuable Community art and culture resource.
2016 PROGRAM GOALS Arts Education –Commissioner Nancy Swanson Develop a community list of Arts professionals willing to provide arts enrichment in
CUSD, Christ Church Day School and Sacred Heart Parish School classrooms Organize and mount a juried student exhibition in the C3 Gallery for spring 2016. Explore an after school visual arts enrichment program for elementary age students in
conjunction with the Coronado Public Library. Promote, support and sponsor with CHS and CoSA the annual Fall for the Arts community
event (October 2016) with student and professional artists and representing the five art forms: Music, Dance, Theatre, Visual Arts and Digital Media.
Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 7 of 9
113
Arts Partners & Advocacy – Commissioner Doug Metz Provide a “roundtable” forum for local arts organizations to exchange information event
and activity schedules, and discuss topics of common in the form of workshops and presentations.
Encourage collaborations between organizations. As resources permit, offer professional assistance to Arts Partners to better employ social
media in communicating and marketing programs. Research and identify four arts organizations (local, regional, state and national) to
establish networking opportunities and gain access to best practices as well and grant opportunities.
Update the 2013 Economic Impact Report. Collaborate with Arts Partners to articulate the impact the arts have on the community and greater San Diego region.
Collaborate with Communications: Public Relations and Media Program Area to develop cultural arts programming for Coronado TV (CTV).
Communications: PR & Media – (vacant) Optimize website and social media by investigating outsourcing social media and website
needs to increase traffic and visibility. Increase listings on CoronadoARTS.com event calendar to include arts events in
Coronado businesses. Expand presence and reach beyond Coronado for promotional opportunities. Collaborate with Arts Partners to develop cultural arts programming for Coronado TV
(CTV). Special Events & Development – Commissioner Frances Howdyshell Investigate possibilities for Coronado Cultural Arts Foundation to fund the arts and
culture activities in Coronado. Utilize grant opportunities to support CAC programs, services, and initiatives. Plan two Dinner a l’Art opportunities (one in the Cays and one in the Village) with
proceeds designated for Arts Education. Continue to build the CAC sponsorship program and facilitate new opportunities. Investigate development of an “on-line gallery” for sales of CAC merchandise. Sponsor “Concert on the Green” at the Coronado Golf Course in the fall of 2016. Explore and develop a new program 100 Muses for Arts Education.
Literary Arts – Commissioner Peggy Lindquist Produce 2016 Coronado Writers Workshop. Continue development of partnership with Bay Books. Establish a community read program modeled on the ALA One Book program. Support local writers/teachers in workshops benefitting writers.
Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 8 of 9
114
Support all Coronado writers in posting writer’s information on CoronadoARTS.com.
Public Art – Commissioner Jeff Tyler Collaborate with the City and designated planning teams to incorporate Public Arts in City
projects including the John D. Spreckels Center, the City Gateway Project, the Spreckels Restroom Project and the USN SEAL “Naked Warrior” Bronze Combat Swimmer Statue installation.
Collaborate with CAC Visual Arts & Arts Education on possibilities for Interactive Art created by students/community.
Continue to explore and pursue additional opportunities to add temporary art installations as appropriate.
Explore and develop opportunities for enabling Coronado residents to commission or donate new public art as family legacy donations.
Increase the promotion of Public Art on both the City and CoronadoARTS.com websites as well as a self-guided tour brochure.
Visual Arts – Commissioner Brenda Jo Robyn Establish local venues for ongoing “pop-up” art exhibits paired with other local events
and tourist attractions. Develop 2-3 hour workshops/ classes for artists centered on activities to submit art work
for exhibition: how to take photos, how to write an artist statement, how to complete applications, pricing artwork, how to create a website; how to sell online thru various outlets; how to negotiate a contract with a gallery.
Establish the Coronado Community Gallery criteria to have new shows rotate through the year, including, submissions, jury selection, judging criteria, entrant fees, exhibit and or reception fees, and percentage of sales to the Gallery for sustainability (maintenance, advertising, etc.)
Establish “Florals by Locals” exhibition in conjunction with the annual Flower Show as an annual event.
Organize a local artists gathering two times a year where artists can meet and greet, show others their work and ask questions of each other. Purpose To promote comradery, and develop an active dialog among artists, seasoned and new.
Continue to add local artists to CoronadoArts.com directory. Begin with artists who submitted to the first gallery exhibition with one featured to the public each week.
Coronado Cultural Arts Commission March 1, 2016 Page 9 of 9
115
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
116
COUNCIL REPORTS ON INTER-AGENCY COMMITTEE AND BOARD ASSIGNMENTS
03/01/16
117
11a
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
118
Bill Sandke – Report on “Other Agency” meetings 1/10/16 to 2/19/16 Out of Coronado area from 01/09/16 until 01/25/16 1/26/16 City briefing Meet with Betty Galbo concerning alley commercial zone concerns Public Leadership Institute – Graduation speaker 1/28/16 San Diego Chamber Anniversary Celebration 2/2/16 South Bay Economic Development Council 2/4/16 Metro JPA Board Meeting 2/5/16 Reception hosted by Counsel General of Mexico 2/9/16 Coronado Chamber Board Meeting 2/11/16 Meet with Cindy Gompers Graves, SCEDC 2/12/16 SANDAG Board Meeting AICUZ briefing from San Diego Airport Authority 2/14/16 Host Coronado Boy Scouts for tour of City Hall 2/17/16 Ribbon Cuttings for Smart and Final and Bellisima Spa City Hall Prep for Affordable Housing Developer Selection 2/18/16 Affordable Housing Developer Selection
03/01/16
119
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
120
Report on Inter-Agency Committee and Board Assignments for Michael Woiwode Period ending 2/16/2016
Friday, 2/12: Meeting with Japanese delegation, as chair of the SANDAG Military Working Group. Dealt with questions about how the military bases and surrounding communities can work together.
Thursday, 2/11: Joint Coronado and Imperial Beach Chamber Sundowner at Loew’s. Good attendance by city officials and business owners of both cities.
Thursday, 2/11: MTS Board of Directors. New advertising program being undertaken by MTS. New bus shelters being installed to replace aging ones. Additional shelters are available.
Thursday, 2/11: SDMAC Board of Directors meeting.
Monday, 2/8: Imperial Beach State of the City Address.
Monday, 2/8: League of California Cities briefing on Medical Marijuana, new legislation, and proposed ballot initiative.
Friday, 2/5: SANDAG Transportation Committee. Extensive discussion about what the region is likely to want to fund in the future. Many interest groups spoke advocating for additional public transit.
Thursday, 2/4: Metro JPA meeting.
03/01/16
121
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
122
INTRODUCTION OF “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 3.60.020 OF CHAPTER 3.60 OF TITLE 3 OF THE CORONADO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNCLAIMED PROPERTY”
RECOMMENDATION: Introduce “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Coronado, California, Amending Section 3.60.020 of Chapter 3.60 of Title 3 of the Coronado Municipal Code Regarding Unclaimed Property.”
FISCAL IMPACT: None anticipated.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Introduction of an ordinance amending the Municipal Code is a legislative action. Legislative actions tend to express a public purpose and make provisions for the ways and means of accomplishing the purpose. Legislative actions involve the exercise of discretion governed by considerations of public welfare, in which case, the City Council is deemed to have “paramount authority” in such decisions.
CEQA: Pursuant to CEQA Section 15061 (b) (3) (the “general rule”) of the State CEQA Guidelines, CEQA does not apply to an activity where there is no possibility for causing a significant effect on the environment.
BACKGROUND: Title 3, Chapter 3.60, Section 3.60.020 provides direction and requirements on storage of unclaimed personal property held by the Coronado Police Department. The duration of storage and disposition of unclaimed property held by the Police Department is governed by State Law in Sections 2080.2 and 2080.3 of the California State Civil Code, which require the property be held at least 90 days. The Coronado Municipal Code currently specifies time periods that unclaimed personal property must be held by the Department. The Municipal Code should to be revised to be consistent with current California State Civil Code. The recommended change to this chapter will bring the Coronado Municipal Code into conformity with California State Civil Code on the retention of unclaimed personal property. Property and evidence take up a fairly large amount of space within the Police facility. State regulations guide dictate the duration of storage and Police Department staff endeavor to purge property and evidence as soon as the law permits so the space used for storage can be managed at a reasonable level. The current City Ordinance requires the Police Department to hold unclaimed property, other than bicycles, for four months, which is about a month longer than is required by State law.
ANALYSIS: Currently, Coronado Municipal Code section 3.60.020, “Storage of property,” requires the Police Department to hold personal property that comes into its possession, other than evidence or contraband, for a period of not less than four months. The section makes an exception for bicycles, for which the holding period is set at three months. Changing the City Ordinance to be consistent with California Civil Code Sections 2080.2 and 2080.3 will shorten the holding period to 90 days for all personal property, other than evidence or contraband. This minor change will improve the efficiency of purging property from the custody of the Police Department, make our rules consistent with State Law, and conserve storage space within the Police Department for the most necessary evidence, which is used for criminal prosecutions.
ALTERNATIVE: The City Council could take no action and leave the ordinance unchanged.
Submitted by Police Department/Froomin Attachments: 1. Proposed Ordinance
2. Version showing edits
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR N/A JNC MLC N/A N/A N/A N/A JF N/A N/A
03/01/16 123
11b
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
124
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. ______________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 3.60.020 OF CHAPTER 3.60 OF TITLE 3 OF THE CORONADO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING UNCLAIMED PROPERTY
WHEREAS, Chapter 3.60 of the Coronado Municipal Code regulates the storage and disposition of unclaimed personal property held by the Police Department; and
WHEREAS, Section 3.60.020 specifies the duration of storage of personal property, other than evidence and contraband, held by the Police Department; and WHEREAS, California State Civil Code Sections 2080.2 and 2080.3 dictates the duration of storage of personal property other than evidence and contraband. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Coronado, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION ONE: The adoption of the ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION TWO: Section 3.60.020 of Chapter 3.60 of Title 3 of the Coronado Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 3.60.020 Storage of property. Personal property described in CMC Section 3.60.010 shall be held by the Police Department for a period of at least 90 days, in accordance with California State Civil Code Sections 2080.2 and 2080.3. SECTION THREE: This ordinance was introduced on March 1, 2016. SECTION FOUR: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City
03/01/16
125
Council of the City of Coronado hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk is directed to publish this ordinance to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of _____ 2016, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
Casey Tanaka, Mayor of the City of Coronado, California ATTEST AND CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. ____, which has been published pursuant to law. Mary L. Clifford, CMC City Clerk
03/01/16
126
Attachment 2 3.60.020 Storage of property. Personal property described in CMC Section 3.60.010 shall be held by the Police Department for a period of four months, except that bicycles shall be held for a period of at least 90 days three months, in accordance with California State Civil Code Sections 2080.2 and 2080.3.
03/01/16
127
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
128
INTRODUCTION OF “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO, CALIFORNIA ADDING SECTION 56.08.080 TO CHAPTER 56.08 OF TITLE 56 OF THE CORONADO MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE THE REMOVAL OF BICYCLES REMAINING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY FOR OVER 72 HOURS”
RECOMMENDATION: Introduce “An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Coronado, California, Adding Section 56.08.080 to Chapter 56.08 of Title 56 of the Coronado Municipal Code Regarding Removal of Bicycles Remaining on Public Property for Over 72 Hours.”
FISCAL IMPACT: No significant impact expected.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Introduction of an ordinance amending the Municipal Code is a legislative action. Legislative actions tend to express a public purpose and make provisions for the ways and means of accomplishing the purpose. Legislative actions involve the exercise of discretion governed by considerations of public welfare, in which case, the City Council is deemed to have “paramount authority” in such decisions.
CEQA: Pursuant to CEQA Section 15061 (b) (3) (the “general rule”) of the State CEQA Guidelines, CEQA does not apply to an activity where there is no possibility for causing a significant effect on the environment.
BACKGROUND: The City has received complaints from time to time regarding abandoned bicycles on public property. While the City of Coronado has an Abandoned Vehicle Policy (CMC 56.30.180), it does not have an abandoned bicycle policy. This matter was researched by City staff and brought before the Bicycle Advisory Committee (BAC) in July 2014. The BAC voted unanimously “to recommend that the City Council adopt an abandoned bicycle policy to have the Police remove bicycles that have been parked 72 hours without being moved, exclusive of long-term designated areas.” The intent of the BAC recommendation is to provide the Police Department with the authority to remove abandoned bicycles from public property, such as City-owned bicycle corrals and bicycle racks, while allowing the ability to exclude certain facilities or areas that are intended for longer-term bicycle parking (such as the bicycle lockers at the Coronado Club Room and Boathouse and the bicycle racks near the Glorietta Bay Marina).
ANALYSIS: Several cities have adopted ordinances pertaining to the removal of abandoned bicycles. City staff have reviewed sample ordinances and recommend the following text be added to the Coronado Municipal Code:
56.08.080 Abandoned Bicycle. Any bicycle that is left on City property for a period of seventy-two (72) consecutive hours or longer shall be deemed abandoned property and may be impounded by the City. This does not apply to bicycles parked legally in City-owned bicycle lockers, to bicycles parked legally at the Glorietta Bay Marina, or to bicycles parked legally in any other areas designated by the City for long-term bicycle parking. Bicycles impounded under this section will be managed as per Chapter 3.60 of the Coronado Municipal Code.
03/01/2016
129
11c
The Police Department will use a process similar to that used with 72-hour violation allegations related to vehicles. Upon report or identification by an employee, the bicycle will be marked in a manner to alert the owner of impending action. After 72 hours, if the bicycle is in substantially the same location, the lack of movement will be noted. After an additional 72-hour period, if the bicycle has not been moved, it may be removed under the authority of this proposed ordinance. This practice is more lenient than the proposed ordinance, but is employed to provide owners additional opportunity to move their bicycles. In some, more problematic instances, a vehicle will be removed after just the first 72-hour observation period. When monitoring vehicles, typically a citation is issued after the first 72-hour observation period. The proposed ordinance does not include a citation provision, so citations will not be issued to bicycles as part of the process. ALTERNATIVE: The City Council could take no action. Submitted by Public Services & Engineering/Van Zerr & Police Department/Froomin Attachment: 1. Proposed Ordinance
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR NA JNC MLC NA NA NA NA JF NA NA
03/01/2016
130
Attachment 1
ORDINANCE NO. ______________
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CORONADO, CALIFORNIA ADDING SECTION 56.08.080 TO CHAPTER 56.08 OF TITLE 56 OF
THE CORONADO MUNICIPAL CODE TO AUTHORIZE THE REMOVAL OF BICYCLES REMAINING ON PUBLIC PROPERTY FOR OVER 72 HOURS
WHEREAS, Section 56.30.180 of the Coronado Municipal Code regulates the removal of vehicles parked in excess of 72 hours; and
WHEREAS, the City has occasion to address bicycles left on City property for excessive periods of time; and WHEREAS, the Coronado Municipal Code does not currently have a specific provision permitting the removal of bicycles left on City property for excessive periods of time. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Coronado, California, does ordain as follows: SECTION ONE: The adoption of the ordinance is not subject to CEQA pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines in that it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment. SECTION TWO: Section 56.08.080 is added to Chapter 56.08 of Title 56 of the Coronado Municipal Code to read as follows: 56.08.080 Abandoned Bicycle. Any bicycle that is left on City property for a period of seventy-two (72) consecutive hours or longer shall be deemed abandoned property and may be impounded by the City. This does not apply to bicycles parked legally in City-owned bicycle lockers, to bicycles parked legally at the Glorietta Bay Marina, or to bicycles parked legally in any other areas designated by the City for long-term bicycle parking. Bicycles impounded under this section will be managed as per Chapter 3.60 of the Coronado Municipal Code. SECTION THREE: This ordinance was introduced on March 1, 2016.
03/01/2016
131
SECTION FOUR: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Coronado hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion may be declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk is directed to publish this ordinance to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933. PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of _____ 2016, by the following vote to wit:
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
Casey Tanaka, Mayor of the City of Coronado, California ATTEST AND CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No. ____, which has been published pursuant to law. Mary L. Clifford, CMC City Clerk
03/01/2016
132
CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INCUMBENT, TODD LITTLE, TO A SECOND THREE-YEAR TERM ON THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION: Appoint Todd Little to a second three-year term, which will expire on March 31, 2019.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: The Government Code provides that the Mayor is responsible for appointments to most commissions or committees, with the approval of the City Council. An appointment to vacancies on City commissions, therefore, is a legislative action. Generally, “legislative” actions receive greater deference from the courts, and persons challenging a legislative action must prove that the decision was arbitrary, capricious, or unlawfully or procedurally unfair.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: The Coronado Municipal Code and City Council Policies #6 and #23 set forth the appointment process to fill vacancies or re-appoint eligible incumbents to City boards, commissions, or committees, and set a limit on the time an individual may serve to a maximum of two terms or eight years, whichever is less.
ANALYSIS: Commissioner Todd Little was appointed on March 19, 2013, to a first, three-year term. He is eligible to serve a second term and has indicated that he is willing to serve if reappointed.
ALTERNATIVE: Decline to make an appointment and direct the City Clerk to advertise for additional applications.
Submitted by City Clerk/Clifford CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR NA JNC MLC NA NA NA NA NA NA RAM
03/01/16 133
11d
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
134
CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT TO FILL ONE VACANCY ON THE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION: Appoint one individual from the list to serve out the remainder of a term, which will expire February 28, 2018.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: The Government Code provides that the Mayor is responsible for appointments to most commissions or committees, with the approval of the City Council. An appointment to a City commission or committee, therefore, is a legislative action. Generally, “legislative” actions receive greater deference from the courts, and persons challenging a legislative action must prove that the decision was arbitrary, capricious, or unlawfully or procedurally unfair.
PUBLIC NOTICE: A display ad was published on January 20, 2016, in the Coronado Eagle & Journal. A notice was also posted at City Hall, the Coronado Public Library, and on the City’s website.
BACKGROUND: The Coronado Municipal Code and City Council Policies #6 and #23 set forth the appointment process to fill vacancies or re-appoint eligible incumbents to City boards, commissions, or committees, and set a limit on the time an individual may serve to a maximum of two terms or eight years, whichever is less.
Harold Aronson was appointed to the Transportation Commission on March 3, 2015, for a term to expire February 28, 2018. Mr. Aronson submitted his resignation on January 13, 2016, due to family health issues.
ANALYSIS: Mr. Aronson was appointed to represent the Shores as provided under CMC 2.74.020(C). With his resignation, the vacancy is to be filled by a resident from the Shores. Current commission membership, with membership designation indicated, is:
Patrick Garahan (at-large) Cauleen Glass (Cays) L. Arthur Van Rooy (at-large) Catherine Squitieri (Village) Lori Luhnow (Village) Howard Somers (Village)
The following individual, residential location indicated, submitted an application for this vacancy by the February 8 deadline:
Timothy J. Chelling (Shores)
ALTERNATIVE: Decline to make an appointment and direct the City Clerk to advertise and to accept additional applications to be considered by the City Council.
Submitted by City Clerk/Clifford Attachments: Application
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR NA JNC MLC NA EW NA NA NA NA NA
03/01/16 135
11e
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
136
137
138
139
140
141
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
142
PROVIDE DIRECTION TO STAFF REGARDING PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SIGNS TO BE CONSIDERED FOR REMOVAL
ISSUE: Provide direction on whether a list of signs generated by Councilmember Bailey should be further analyzed to be considered for removal.
RECOMMENDATION: Review the list of signs provided by Councilmember Bailey and direct staff to work with the Traffic Operations Committee in making a recommendation on the final disposition on each of the sign categories the Council desires to be considered for removal.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost associated with this issue is mainly related to time. It will take an estimated fifteen minutes to one hour to review each unique type or group of signs; this time includes evaluating a sign’s necessity in relation to other signs and as provided by the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), coordinating with Police and Fire, and site inspections, as necessary. If the removal of a sign is ultimately recommended and approved, it would cost approximately $160 per sign in staff time to remove each sign and any associated pole.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Review and direction related to a study is a policy matter and an advisory action reflective of the Council’s legislative role. Therefore a person that would challenge such a legislative action must prove that the decision was “arbitrary, capricious, entirely lacking in evidentiary support, or unlawfully or procedurally unfair” per the California court decision of Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Bd. of Education [(1982) 32 Cal. 3d 779, 786]. Under the California Environmental Quality Act, the Council’s role is somewhat limited since the project is exempt from the Initial Study process as an “information collection” activity.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: At the September 1, 2015, City Council meeting, Councilmember Bailey requested to agendize a discussion to remove various signs throughout the community. The Council directed staff to bring the list of signs that Councilmember Bailey compiled back on a future agenda to discuss the possible removal of the specified signs.
ANALYSIS: The MUTCD provides design standards and guidelines for the use and placement of signs and pavement markings in the state of California. The purpose of the MUTCD is to provide consistent application of traffic control devices state-wide and to ensure compliance with the California Vehicle Code (CVC). Depending on the type of sign in question, the MUTCD provides varying degrees of flexibility on the use and placement of signs; some signs must be used in strict accordance with the guidelines (“the sign shall be placed…”) while other guidelines are more open to interpretation and site-specific conditions (“the sign should or may be placed…”). As a result, when considering the use of signs where some degree of discretion is given to the local agency, it is common to review the recommended installation with the City’s Traffic Operations Committee to ensure a wide-range of perspectives are considered (particularly from the Fire and Police Departments).
03/01/16
143
11f
The MUTCD also categorizes signs according to the purpose of the signs. These categories include regulatory, warning and guide signs. Each type of sign in these three categories has specific requirements and/or guidelines set forth by the MUTCD. Based on the table and pictures provided by Councilmember Bailey, a total of 289 signs are regulatory, 69 signs are warning, 9 signs are guide, 42 are wayfinding, and 5 were unable to be identified. In addition, Councilmember Bailey identified an unspecified number of regulatory “No Parking during certain hours without a permit” signs in the northwest quadrant he would also like to see reduced. The 5 signs that were not categorized were due to the inability to locate the sign in question, identify the sign in the picture, or the sign was missing on the post shown. Staff has reviewed the list of signs submitted for consideration, identified and categorized several types of signs that were repeatedly listed for review, and provides a brief explanation of the types of restrictions, recommendations or suggestions set forth in the MUTCD and CVC as well as considerations staff would make when reviewing. REGULATORY SIGNAGE – 289 signs (plus an unspecified number of “No Parking signs during certain hours” signs). Regulatory signs are generally used to inform motorists of traffic laws or regulations and are usually required to enforce the underlying regulation. Bike Route - The standard set forth in the MUTCD states that the bike lane (R81(CA)) sign shall be placed at the beginning of each designated bike lane and along each bike lane at all major changes in direction. In addition, the MUTCD recommends that signage be placed at half mile intervals and at every intersection with an arterial street. Bike lane signs are considered regulatory signs. Before recommending the removal of any particular sign, the location and spacing of all signs along a particular route would need to be reviewed. No Parking - No parking signs (and similar signs restricting parking) are considered regulatory signs. The MUTCD states that curb markings alone can be used to prohibit or restrict parking within a specified distance from a stop sign, yield sign, driveway, fire hydrant, or crosswalk. Any other curb markings used to prohibit or restrict parking shall be used in conjunction with signs (often at both the beginning and end of the specified area) or word markings painted on the curb. No parking signs are considered regulatory signs. For increased awareness and to reduce the amount of maintenance required, signs have historically been used by the City; however, in some cases, signs are able to be replaced with word stencils on the curb. In general, signs need to be clearly visible from prohibited parking areas for the successful prosecution of violations. Permit Parking - The existing permit parking signs located within the northwest quadrant of the City are considered regulatory signs and are required to be placed at specific intervals based on the size of the text on the sign itself per MUTCD standards. It is staff’s impression that the existing sign placement complies with this requirement; however, a detailed review, including the size of the sign and the existing spacing between signs, would need to be conducted to determine if any signs can be removed.
03/01/16
144
WARNING SIGNAGE – 69 signs Warning signs are used to call attention to unexpected conditions and situations that might not be apparent to the motorist (eg., speed hump, not a through street, approaching a T intersection, and approaching a school crossing) and are generally placed based on an engineering study or engineering judgement per the MUTCD. GUIDE SIGNAGE – 9 signs Guide signs are used for wayfinding and to notify motorists of route designations, destinations, distances, services, points of interest, etc. and are generally not required by the MUTCD. WAYFINDING SIGNAGE – 42 signs Similar to the guide signs above, these signs help guide motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians to their destination using the preferred and safest route and are not required by the MUTCD. The contract to fabricate these signs was approved by the City Council on November 3, 2015. They are currently being fabricated and will be installed within the next 45 days. NOT IDENTIFIED – 5 signs These signs were unable to be identified because either the sign was missing or was too faded to be identified and in need of replacement. These will require further analysis to determine their purpose and need. POSSIBLE SIGNS TO CONSIDER THAT WERE NOT ORIGINALLY IDENTIFIED – The following warning, regulatory and emergency management signs could be considered for removal but were not originally identified by Councilmember Bailey:
• Tsunami Warning Signs • No Vehicles For Sale Signs
If these signs were removed the enforcement of the ordinances stated on the regulatory signs would be more challenging and may not be practical. The advisory signs located in the downtown and beach areas referenced above are placed to inform residents and visitors of the City’s regulations and ordinances with the intent to improve compliance. If removed, that information would not be accessible to the public, especially to those not familiar with the area whom would benefit from the sign the most. In order to evaluate the list of signs in its entirety and provide a recommendation for the removal or preservation of each sign, staff would need to look at each one on a case-by-case basis. The time needed to review each sign is dependent on the requirements set forth in the MUTCD; some will require a simple review of standards and the photo supplied while others will require a site inspection to determine spacing, etc. In addition, some of the signs in question are not in the City’s right-of-way and are owned and maintained by another jurisdiction (eg., Port District, Caltrans, etc.). If the Council directs staff to continue investigating these signs, the agencies will need to be consulted if the recommendation will be to remove or minimize their signage. Staff can review the different types of regulatory signs that were identified; however, if these signs are reduced or removed, enforcement of these regulations may not be feasible. Coordination with
03/01/16
145
Police and/or Fire will be necessary to make a recommendation for the removal of regulatory signs. Staff estimates it will take between fifteen minutes to an hour to review each unique type or group of signs. In addition to a detailed review, staff suggests that the Traffic Operations Committee (TOC) review any signs that are considered for removal as the TOC is responsible for providing recommendations on traffic control devices, regulatory signage, parking restrictions, etc. Given the number of signs, the Council may want to provide clarification on which category or type of signs to be further analyzed and presented to the TOC. ALTERNATIVE: Direct staff to analyze a particular sign, a combination of signs, or do not direct staff to analyze any of the signs. Submitted by Public Services & Engineering/Odiorne Exhibit A – Councilmember Bailey’s written request Exhibit B - Table of Signs provided by Councilmember Bailey Exhibit C - Pictures of Signs provided by Councilmember Bailey \\Chfile2\all\All Departments\Staff Reports - Drafts\2016 Meetings\03-01 Meeting SR Due Feb. 18\FINAL SR - Direction on Sign Reduction.doc
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR NA JNC MLC N/A EW MB NA JF CMM NA
03/01/16
146
8/25/2015 Mayor and Council- I would like to request the Council consider uninstalling various signs throughout our community. A frequent complaint I hear is that the number of signs our small community has installed around town creates visual clutter and detracts from our neighborhoods. While many of these signs are required by law, it is my goal to identify the signs not legally required and seek Council direction to remove the signs and/or find a messaging alternative that is less visually intrusive. Understanding that staff time is limited, I have identified signs throughout town and received suggestions from residents for signs that should be considered for removal. Examples of signs are included below. I would like a future staff report to include the complete list of signs, whether or not they are legally required and estimated cost for removal. Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully Richard Bailey Sign Example1: No parking beginning and end signs within 12 ft of each other next to red curb.
Sign Example2: An old, faded sign in Tidelands Park
Exhibit A - Councilmember Bailey's Written Request
147
Exhi
bit B
– T
able
of S
igns
Pro
vide
d by
Cou
ncilm
embe
r Bai
ley
# Si
gn D
escr
iptio
n(s)
Lo
catio
n Co
unt
Type
(add
ed b
y St
aff)
Poss
ible
Alte
rnat
ive
note
s
1 ts
unam
i war
ning
gl
orie
tta
blvd
(nex
t to
tidle
ands
) 1
Guid
e
2 Ha
rbor
Vie
w P
ark
1000
1st
1
Guid
e
unne
cess
ary
and
look
s pat
hetic
3 rig
ht tu
rn to
NAS
NI
entr
ance
20
0 al
amed
a 1
Guid
e
it is
obvi
ous w
here
the
base
is
4 ba
y vi
ew p
ark
1st
1 Gu
ide
mak
e le
ss c
onsp
icuo
us
5 Ba
thro
oms o
n 6t
h st
(blu
e sig
n)
Spre
ckle
s 1
Guid
e
unne
cess
ary
and
if it
is ne
cess
ary
thre
e th
en w
e sh
ould
be
on e
very
cor
ner
6 Bu
sines
s Dist
rict
4th
St (o
ne b
lock
up
frm
or
ange
) 1
Guid
e
who
is th
e au
dien
ce fo
r tha
t? D
oes n
ot h
elp
anyo
ne
navi
gate
7 Bu
sines
s Dist
rict
3rd
St a
nd O
rang
e
1 Gu
ide
w
ho is
the
audi
ence
for t
hat?
Doe
s not
hel
p an
yone
na
viga
te
8 St
ate
High
way
Sig
n 3r
d an
d B
1 Gu
ide
O
bscu
red
by tr
ee -
may
be w
e ca
n ju
st g
et ri
d of
it si
nce
no
one
seem
ed to
not
ice
it w
as o
bscu
red
by tr
ee
9 no
par
king
sign
gl
orie
tta
blvd
(nex
t to
tidle
ands
) 1
Regu
lato
ry
al
read
y a
red
curb
in p
lace
10
no st
oppi
ng
stan
ding
or p
arki
ng
com
mer
ical
ve
hich
les o
ver 5
to
ns
100
A Av
e 3
Regu
lato
ry
few
er si
gns
ther
e isn
't en
ough
spac
e fo
r a 5
ton
com
mer
icla
veh
ichl
e an
yway
s
11
no p
arki
ng o
f ve
hich
les o
ver 6
' 10
0 A
Ave
3 Re
gula
tory
fe
wer
sign
s no
t bei
ng e
nfor
ced
anyw
ays -
no
othe
r sig
ns th
roug
hout
to
wn
12
bike
lane
end
10
0 A
Ave
1 Re
gula
tory
13
bi
ke la
ne b
egin
10
0 A
Ave
1 Re
gula
tory
14
no p
arki
ng o
f ve
hich
les o
ver 6
' 14
00 1
st
1 Re
gula
tory
not b
eing
enf
orce
d an
yway
s - n
o ot
her s
igns
thro
ugho
ut
tow
n 15
Bi
ke la
ne si
gns
1200
- 14
00 1
st
8 Re
gula
tory
stat
ing
the
obvi
ous
16
no p
arki
ng o
f ve
hich
les o
ver 6
' 13
00 1
st
1 Re
gula
tory
fa
ded
not v
isibl
e fr
om st
reet
and
fade
d
17
No
skat
eboa
rdin
g,
rolle
rbla
ding
, bi
king
on
sidew
alk
1200
-130
0 1s
t 8
Regu
lato
ry
loca
te to
tras
hcan
s lik
e on
Ora
nge
and/
or p
ut
sten
cil a
t beg
inni
ng o
f bl
ock
18
Bike
Lan
es si
gn
100-
1100
1st
6
Regu
lato
ry
19
No
Park
ing
durin
g ce
rtai
n ho
urs
with
out p
erm
it 10
0-11
00 1
st
32
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce n
umbe
r of s
igns
03/0
1/16
148
Exhi
bit B
– T
able
of S
igns
Pro
vide
d by
Cou
ncilm
embe
r Bai
ley
20
No
Park
ing
durin
g ce
rtai
n ho
urs
with
out p
erm
it 10
0 - 5
00 A
lam
eda
25
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce n
umbe
r of s
igns
21
Do N
ot E
nter
10
th a
nd A
lam
eda
2 Re
gula
tory
re
duce
num
ber o
f sig
ns
22
Do
Not
Ent
er
Mar
ina
and
Alam
eda
2 Re
gula
tory
re
duce
num
ber o
f sig
ns
23
25 M
PH si
gns
Alam
eda
8 Re
gula
tory
re
duce
num
ber o
f sig
ns
or g
o w
ith 2
5 M
PH
mar
king
on
road
re
siden
ts sh
ould
be
aske
d
24
No
Park
ing
begi
nnin
g an
d en
d 10
0 Al
amed
a 2
Regu
lato
ry
un
nece
ssar
y bc
of r
ed c
urb
25
Bike
Lan
es si
gn
6th
12
Regu
lato
ry
26
No
Park
ing
durin
g ce
rtai
n ho
urs
with
out p
erm
it 6t
h 14
Re
gula
tory
re
duce
num
ber o
f sig
ns
27
No
skat
eboa
rdin
g,
rolle
rbla
ding
, bi
king
on
sidew
alk
6th
4 Re
gula
tory
loca
te to
tras
hcan
s lik
e on
Ora
nge
and/
or p
ut
sten
cil a
t beg
inni
ng o
f bl
ock
28
No
Dogs
in P
ark
Spre
ckle
s 6
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce n
umbe
r of s
igns
sig
ns o
n A-
fram
es a
re re
ptet
ive
29
No
Golfi
ng
Spre
ckle
s 3
Regu
lato
ry
get r
id o
f the
one
s not
on
stan
dard
city
sign
s sh
ould
be
cons
isten
t
30
No
skat
eboa
rdin
g,
rolle
rbla
ding
, bi
king
on
sidew
alk
Spre
ckle
s 12
Re
gula
tory
re
duce
num
ber o
f sig
ns
and/
or u
se st
enci
s on
grou
nd
31
3hr P
arki
ng
600
Ora
nge
4 Re
gula
tory
re
duce
num
ber o
f sig
ns
or p
aint
cur
b
32
Perm
it Pa
rkin
g O
nly
4-7p
m
Sund
ay
600
C Av
e (S
prec
kles
) 3
Regu
lato
ry
get r
id o
f and
put
out
A-
fram
e sig
ns d
ay o
f
33
Pass
enge
r loa
ding
zo
ne b
egin
ning
an
d en
d 7t
h ne
xt to
Sac
red
Hear
t 2
Regu
lato
ry
whi
te c
urb
it
34
Hand
icap
Par
king
Si
gns
600
Ora
nge
2 Re
gula
tory
re
duce
to 1
but
kee
p sa
me
num
ber o
f ha
ndic
ap sp
aces
the
signs
do
not a
ctua
lly d
elin
eate
spac
es a
s the
re is
one
co
ntin
uous
blu
e cu
rb
35
15 m
in p
arki
ng
begi
n an
d en
d 60
0 O
rang
e 2
Regu
lato
ry
elim
inat
e cu
rb is
alre
ady
pain
ted
with
15
min
lim
it
36
No
skat
eboa
rdin
g,
rolle
rbla
ding
, bi
king
on
sidew
alk
600
Ora
nge
(libr
ary
side)
4
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce/ e
limin
ate/
st
enci
l
37
2 hr
par
king
60
0 O
rang
e 4
Regu
lato
ry
curb
mar
king
s or
03/0
1/16
149
Exhi
bit B
– T
able
of S
igns
Pro
vide
d by
Cou
ncilm
embe
r Bai
ley
elim
inat
e
38
Bike
Lan
es si
gn
glor
iett
a bl
vd (g
olf
cour
se d
ie)
14
Regu
lato
ry
un
nece
sary
39
No
Park
ing
of c
ars
for s
ale
Pom
ona
(acr
oss s
tree
t fr
om y
acht
clu
b 5
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce
40
25 M
PH si
gns
glor
iett
a go
lf co
urse
side
1
Regu
lato
ry
repl
ace
need
s to
be re
plac
ed o
r rem
oved
- re
siden
ts sh
ould
be
aske
d ab
out r
emov
al
41
25 M
PH si
gns
glor
iett
a go
lf co
urse
side
6
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce/ r
ely
on st
enci
ls sp
eed
hum
ps p
reve
nt p
eopl
e fr
om v
iola
ting
the
spee
d lim
it so
sign
s may
not
be
nece
ssar
y re
siden
ts sh
oul b
e as
ked
abou
t rem
oval
42
no m
otor
veh
ichl
es
pom
ona
clas
s 1 b
ike
lane
ent
ranc
e 1
Regu
lato
ry
in
cons
isten
t app
licat
ion
-if it
SHO
ULD
be
ther
e is
shou
ld b
e ev
eryw
here
…I t
hink
it is
unn
eces
sary
43
No
Left
Tur
n on
4t
h fr
om O
rnag
e O
rang
e an
d 4t
h 1
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce
6 sig
ns te
lling
you
whi
ch a
y yo
u ca
n go
(can
we
get r
id o
f th
e ug
ly o
ne in
the
mid
dle)
44
N
o Pa
rkin
g 40
0 O
rang
e 2
Regu
lato
ry
al
read
y ar
ed c
urb
45
right
lane
mus
t tu
rn ri
ght
400
oran
ge
1 Re
gula
tory
3 sig
ns a
lread
y st
ate
right
lane
mus
t tur
n rig
ht
46
Truc
k Ro
ute
(str
aigh
t or t
urn
right
) 40
0 O
rang
e 1
Regu
lato
ry
sim
ply
stat
ing
the
only
dire
ctio
n an
y ca
r can
phy
scia
lly
trav
el -
unne
cess
ary
47
Left
lane
mus
t tur
n le
ft
1100
3rd
3
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce
48
Park
ing
of
Vehi
chle
s for
sale
pr
ohib
ited
300
Ora
nge
6 Re
gula
tory
re
duce
49
No
Park
ing
durin
g ce
rtai
n ho
urs
with
out p
erm
it 3r
d St
(Wes
t of O
rang
e)
24
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce n
umbe
r of s
igns
50
No
Park
ing
durin
g ce
rtai
n ho
urs
with
out p
erm
it 2n
d St
(wes
t of O
rang
e)
30
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce n
umbe
r of s
igns
51
Do N
ot E
nter
10
0 O
rang
e Co
min
g fr
om 1
st S
t 1
Regu
lato
ry
bi
g ug
ly si
gn in
the
med
ian
52
Dire
ctio
nal A
rrow
s fo
r upc
omin
g tr
affic
sign
al
100
Ora
nge
1 Re
gula
tory
redu
ndan
t sig
n an
d th
is on
e is
mor
e un
sight
ly
53
No
Righ
t Tur
n (o
nto
3rd
from
O
rang
e)
3rd
and
Ora
nge
1 Re
gula
tory
five
signs
dire
ct p
rope
r tra
ffic
flow
-thi
s is t
he m
ost
unsig
htly
54
Truc
k Ro
ute
3rd
and
Ora
nge
1 Re
gula
tory
conf
usin
g an
d w
ho re
ads t
hat/
who
act
ually
obe
ys th
at
03/0
1/16
150
Exhi
bit B
– T
able
of S
igns
Pro
vide
d by
Cou
ncilm
embe
r Bai
ley
55
Dire
ctio
nal A
rrow
s fo
r upc
omin
g tr
affic
sign
al
300
Ora
nge
(med
ian)
1
Regu
lato
ry
re
dund
ant s
ign
and
this
one
is m
ore
unsig
htly
56
Truc
k Ro
ute
4th
and
Ora
nge
(tra
velin
g ea
st o
n 4t
h)
1 Re
gula
tory
sign
stat
es a
truc
k ca
n tr
avel
all
the
rout
es e
very
oth
er c
ar
can
trav
el -s
eem
s unn
eess
ary
57
Truc
k Ro
ute
4th
St
1 Re
gula
tory
sign
says
to g
o st
raig
ht (l
ike
all t
he o
ther
traf
fic is
doi
ng)
58
Truc
k Ro
ute
3rd
and
Ora
nge
1 Re
gula
tory
does
any
truc
k dr
ive
real
ly n
ot k
now
? Do
es th
is sig
n re
ally
he
lp?
Is it
enf
orce
d if
not f
ollo
wed
?
59
Spee
d En
forc
ed b
y Ra
dar
Righ
t aft
er b
ridge
in
tria
ngle
med
ian
1 Re
gula
tory
do w
e ha
ve to
disp
lay
this?
60
No
Righ
t Tur
n Ri
ght a
fter
brid
ge in
tr
iang
le m
edia
n 1
Regu
lato
ry
th
e "n
o rig
ht tu
rn" b
lock
s viib
ility
of t
he o
ne w
ay st
reet
sig
n fr
om m
any
angl
es -
an w
e ge
t rid
of t
he "n
o rig
ht
turn
"
61
No
Left
Tur
n
4th
and
Ora
nge
(tra
velin
g ea
st o
n 4t
h in
th
e m
edia
n)
1 Re
gula
tory
five
signs
dire
ct p
rope
r tra
ffic
flow
-thi
s is t
he m
ost
unsig
htly
62
No
Park
ing
Anyi
me
4th
and
Ora
nge
(tra
velin
g N
orth
on
Ora
nge)
1
Regu
lato
ry
al
read
y a
red
curb
exi
sts
63
Truc
k Ro
ute
4th
and
Ora
nge
(tra
velin
g N
orth
on
Ora
nge)
1
Regu
lato
ry
al
l tra
ffic
can
flow
the
sam
e di
rect
ion
as th
e tr
uck
rout
e so
w
hy is
it n
eces
sary
?
64
No
Pede
stria
n Cr
ossin
g RH
Dan
a Pl
ace
and
Ora
nge
(med
ian)
1
Regu
lato
ry
w
ithin
six
ft o
f a m
arke
d cr
ossw
alk
- jus
t see
ms u
nces
sear
y
65
2 hr
par
king
10
0-30
0 bl
ock
of O
rang
e 4
Regu
lato
ry
un
nece
ssar
y
66
No
Park
ing
durin
g ce
rtai
n ho
urs
with
out p
erm
it N
orth
wes
t qua
dran
t bi
llio
ns
Regu
lato
ry
redu
ce n
umbe
r of s
igns
in
clud
es a
ll of
the
prev
ious
ly m
entio
ned
signs
67
not a
thro
ugh
stre
et
1400
1st
1
War
ning
68
red
diam
ond
1400
1st
(dea
d en
d in
to
broa
dsto
ne)
1 W
arni
ng
new
sign
se
ems u
nnec
essa
ry a
nd a
t the
ver
y le
ast i
n no
t fun
ctio
nal
now
due
to b
eing
ben
t
69
T In
ters
ectio
n di
rect
iona
l sig
n
100-
1100
1st
7
War
ning
cars
are
allo
wed
to p
ark
in fr
ont o
f the
m so
they
are
not
vi
sible
muc
h of
the
time
anyw
ays
70
T In
ters
ectio
n di
rect
iona
l sig
n
Alam
eda
(and
cro
ss
stre
ets)
6
War
ning
cars
are
allo
wed
to p
ark
in fr
ont o
f som
e of
them
so
defe
ats t
he p
urpo
se
71
Yello
w D
iagn
ols
10th
and
Ala
med
a 10
W
arni
ng
redu
ce n
umbe
r of s
igns
72
scho
ol c
ross
ing
100
6th
1 W
arni
ng
not v
isibl
e be
hind
tree
73
not a
thro
ugh
stre
et
coun
try
club
and
6th
1
War
ning
unne
esse
ssar
y
74
scho
ol c
ross
ing
6th
1 W
arni
ng
repl
ace
sign
bent
03/0
1/16
151
Exhi
bit B
– T
able
of S
igns
Pro
vide
d by
Cou
ncilm
embe
r Bai
ley
75
scho
ol c
ross
ing
6th
6 W
arni
ng
redu
ce n
umbe
r of s
igns
76
T In
ters
ectio
n di
rect
iona
l sig
n
6th
and
Glor
iett
a 1
War
ning
cars
are
allw
ed to
par
k in
fron
t of i
t
77
Spee
d Bu
mps
Ah
ead
6th
and
Pom
ona
(hea
ding
eas
t on
6th)
1
War
ning
spee
d hu
mp
is on
the
othe
r sid
e of
an
inte
rsec
tion
afte
r tw
o di
ps a
nd a
stop
sign
-see
ms u
nnec
ssar
y
78
spee
d hu
mps
ah
ead
1400
5th
1
War
ning
ther
e w
ere
no sp
eed
hum
ps b
etw
een
the
sign
and
end
of
stre
et
79
T In
ters
ectio
n di
rect
iona
l sig
n
glor
iett
a bl
vd (g
olf
cour
se d
ie)
7 W
arni
ng
in
cons
isten
tly a
pplie
d an
d th
ey d
o no
t alw
ays l
ine
up w
ith
inte
rsec
tion
80
3 Ye
llow
Dia
gnol
s 1s
t and
Ora
nge
3 W
arni
ng
find
a di
ffere
nt w
ay to
di
spla
y th
e sig
ns
81
Yello
w D
iam
ond
3rd
next
to S
-cur
ve
1 W
arni
ng
ha
s gra
ffiti
82
Truc
ks E
nter
ing
Adel
la…
O
rang
e ne
xt to
Co
rona
do B
each
Res
ort
1 W
arni
ng
ve
ry u
nsig
htly
sign
- be
nt u
p
83
T In
ters
ectio
n di
rect
iona
l sig
n
Coun
try
Club
6
War
ning
seem
unn
eces
sary
84
Yello
w D
iam
onds
Co
untr
y Cl
ub
6 W
arni
ng
se
em u
nnec
essa
ry
85
T In
ters
ectio
n di
rect
iona
l sig
n
Oce
an B
lvd
6 W
arni
ng
m
any
are
bloc
ked
by v
ehic
hles
86
Not
a th
roug
h st
reet
O
cean
Driv
e 1
War
ning
neig
hors
shou
ld b
e as
ked
if th
ey w
ould
like
it re
mov
ed
87
Park
ing
Sign
and
ye
llow
dia
gnol
s go
ing
into
par
king
lot
acro
ss fr
om N
icky
's 2
War
ning
/Gui
de
relo
cate
or g
et ri
d of
lo
oks t
rash
y an
d ou
t of p
lace
88
fade
d sig
n gl
orie
tta
blvd
(nex
t to
tidle
ands
) 1
Unc
ateg
orize
d re
plac
emen
t sig
n?
89
Blan
k Si
gn
200
1st
1 U
ncat
egor
ized
90
bl
ank
sign
200
alam
eda
1 U
ncat
egor
ized
sign
is bl
ank
91
empt
y po
le
Pom
ona
(acr
oss s
tree
t fr
om y
acht
clu
b 1
Unc
ateg
orize
d
92
End
Truc
k Ro
ute
(blu
e sig
n)
400
Ora
nge
1 U
ncat
egor
ized
15' a
ter t
his i
s ano
ther
Blu
e Tr
uck
Rout
e sig
n
93
A 3r
d an
d O
rang
e M
edia
n 1
Way
findi
ng
N
ot v
isibi
lbe
from
the
road
way
whe
re th
e de
cisio
n of
w
hich
lane
to b
e in
in o
rder
to re
ach
dest
inat
ion
mus
t be
mad
e
94
B.1
Silv
er S
tran
d Bl
vd
1 W
ayfin
ding
Does
not
dire
ct tr
affic
in a
ny d
irect
ion
as th
ere
is on
ly w
ay
dire
ctio
n of
trav
el
95
B.2
Silv
er S
tran
d Bl
vd
1 W
ayfin
ding
Does
not
dire
ct tr
affic
in a
ny d
irect
ion
as th
ere
is on
ly w
ay
dire
ctio
n of
trav
el
96
C.3
1st a
nd C
1
Way
findi
ng
N
ot w
orth
the
cost
or t
he c
lutt
er
97
C.4
O
rang
e an
d 3r
d 1
Way
findi
ng
U
nnec
essa
ry a
s the
vas
t maj
ority
of t
raffi
c tr
avel
ing
in th
at
dire
ctio
n is
not h
eadi
ng to
any
of t
he d
estin
atio
ns
03/0
1/16
152
Exhi
bit B
– T
able
of S
igns
Pro
vide
d by
Cou
ncilm
embe
r Bai
ley
98
C.5
Ora
nge
and
8th
1 W
ayfin
ding
Not
wor
th th
e co
st o
r the
clu
tter
99
C.7
Orn
age
and
Park
1
Way
findi
ng
Th
e sig
n is
lcoa
ted
next
to th
e de
stin
atio
n -if
a c
ar w
ould
no
tice
that
sign
they
wou
ld a
lso n
otic
e th
e m
useu
m a
nd
visit
or c
ente
r sig
ns a
lread
y lc
oate
d on
bui
ldin
g
100
C.
8 Si
lver
Str
and
Blvd
& A
ve
de L
as A
rena
s 1
Way
findi
ng
Al
l des
tinat
ions
are
alre
ady
clea
rly v
isibl
e fr
om th
e ro
ad
(mor
e so
than
a si
gn w
ould
be
to tr
affic
trav
elin
g at
50
mph
)
101
C.
9 Si
lver
Str
and
Blvd
& A
ve
de L
as A
rena
s 1
Way
findi
ng
Al
l des
tinat
ions
are
alre
ady
clea
rly v
isibl
e fr
om th
e ro
ad
(mor
e so
than
a si
gn w
ould
be
to tr
affic
trav
elin
g at
50
mph
) 1
02
C.10
O
rang
e Av
e ad
RH
Dana
1
Way
findi
ng
N
ot w
oth
the
cost
of t
he c
lutt
er
103
C.
11
Ora
nge
and
3rd
1 W
ayfin
ding
Not
pro
vidi
ng a
ny u
sefu
l inf
orm
atio
n as
all
dire
ctio
nal
signs
poi
nt in
the
sam
e di
rect
ion
-not
wor
th th
e co
st o
r th
e cl
utte
r.
104
C.
12
Ora
nge
and
1st
1 W
ayfin
ding
Unn
eces
sary
as n
o on
e tr
avle
ing
to th
ose
dest
inat
ions
will
ha
ve n
avig
ated
by
signs
105
C.
13
Ora
nge
and
4th
1 W
ayfin
ding
Unn
eces
sary
as t
he v
ast m
ajor
ity o
f tra
ffic
trav
elin
g in
that
di
rect
ion
is no
t hea
ding
to a
ny o
f the
des
tinat
ions
106
C.
14
Alam
eda
and
Coun
try
Club
1
Way
findi
ng
U
nnec
essa
ry a
s the
vas
t maj
ority
of t
raffi
c tr
avel
ing
in th
at
dire
ctio
n is
not h
eadi
ng to
any
of t
he d
estin
atio
ns
107
C.
15
RH D
ana
1 W
ayfin
ding
Unn
eces
sary
as a
nyon
e tr
avel
ing
to a
ny o
f the
de
stin
atio
ns w
ould
not
be
navi
gatin
g by
sign
s and
they
w
ould
've
alre
ady
driv
en th
roug
h th
e sh
op/d
ine
area
so n
o sig
n w
ould
be
need
ed
108
C.
16
Pom
ona
Ave
at T
enni
s Ce
nter
1
Way
findi
ng
U
nnec
essa
ry a
s you
can
see
the
brid
ge a
nd th
e go
lf co
urse
fr
om th
e lo
catio
n of
the
sign
109
D.
1 1s
t and
Cen
tenn
ial P
ark
1 W
ayfin
ding
You
are
stan
ding
righ
t nex
t to
Cent
enni
al P
ark
and
all
othe
r des
tinat
ions
are
on
your
left
(the
onl
y w
ay so
mon
e ca
n go
)
110
D.
3 6t
h an
d O
rang
e 1
Way
findi
ng
U
nnec
essa
ry a
s all
dest
inat
ions
poi
nt so
meo
ne st
raig
ht
ahea
d -m
ight
as w
ell m
ake
a sm
alle
r sig
n th
at ju
st sa
ys
"kee
p go
ing
stra
ight
"
111
D.
4 O
rang
e an
d Ro
tary
Pla
za
1 W
ayfin
ding
High
ped
estr
ain
volu
me
- any
one
coul
d sim
ply
ask
for
dire
ctio
ns to
any
of t
hese
loca
tions
112
D.
5 75
and
Pom
ona
1 W
ayfin
ding
Nea
rly a
ll de
stin
atio
ns a
re e
ither
visi
ble
from
the
loca
tion
of th
e sig
n, o
r not
targ
etin
g pe
dest
rians
1
13
D.7
Ora
nge
Ave
& P
omon
a 1
Way
findi
ng
Al
l des
tinat
ion
visib
le fr
om th
e lo
catio
n of
the
sign
114
D.
8 O
rang
e Av
e &
Pom
ona
1 W
ayfin
ding
The
top
of th
e Ho
tel D
el is
visi
ble
ad y
ou c
an h
ear t
he
ocea
n fr
om th
e sig
n lo
catio
n 1
15
D.9
Pom
ona
at P
ocke
t Par
k 1
Way
findi
ng
Al
l des
tinat
ions
are
visi
ble
from
the
sign
loca
tion
116
F.
1 an
d F.
2 1s
t and
Ala
med
a 2
Way
findi
ng
Bo
th a
re u
nnec
essa
ry b
ut a
t the
VER
Y le
ast c
ombi
ne th
e
03/0
1/16
153
Exhi
bit B
– T
able
of S
igns
Pro
vide
d by
Cou
ncilm
embe
r Bai
ley
signs
to o
ne lo
catio
n on
one
pol
e
117
F.
3 Ti
dela
nds P
ark
1 W
ayfin
ding
Unn
eces
sary
as m
any
of th
e bi
kers
are
not
goi
ng to
the
dest
inat
ions
and
if th
ey a
re re
nter
s the
y al
read
y ha
ve
map
s
118
F.
4 Gl
orie
tta
Bay
and
Pom
ona
1 W
ayfin
ding
just
a p
oint
less
sign
with
no
audi
ence
119
F.
5 Gl
orie
tta
Bay
and
10th
1
Way
findi
ng
N
ot w
orth
the
cost
or t
he c
lutt
er
120
F.
6 Av
e De
l Sol
1
Way
findi
ng
M
ost p
eopl
e us
ing
the
bays
hore
bik
eway
wou
ld n
ot b
e co
min
g fr
om th
at d
irect
ion
anyw
ays
121
F.
7 75
and
Ave
de
las
Aren
as
1 W
ayfin
ding
All d
estin
atio
ns v
isibl
e fr
om si
gn lo
catio
n
122
F.
8 75
Ave
Del
Sol
1
Way
findi
ng
Th
ere
is no
t eno
ugh
bicy
cle
traf
fic to
just
ify th
e co
st a
nd
the
clut
ter
123
G.
1
1 W
ayfin
ding
Not
wor
th th
e co
st o
r the
clu
tter
1
24
G.2
1
Way
findi
ng
N
ot w
orth
the
cost
or t
he c
lutt
er
125
G.
3
1 W
ayfin
ding
Not
wor
th th
e co
st o
r the
clu
tter
1
26
G.4
and
G.5
Glor
iett
a Ba
y an
d SR
75
2 W
ayfin
ding
Com
bine
to b
e on
one
pol
e lo
catio
n
127
G.
7 Po
mon
a an
d Si
lver
St
rand
Blv
d 1
Way
findi
ng
N
ot w
orth
the
cost
or t
he c
lutt
er
128
G.
10
75 a
nd C
row
n Co
ve
2 W
ayfin
ding
Not
wor
th th
e co
st a
s the
bea
ch d
estin
atio
n is
visib
le fr
om
sign
loca
tion
and
the
othe
r des
tinat
ions
are
alre
ady
know
n fo
r mos
t of t
he w
ould
-be
audi
ence
129
G.
11
75 a
nd C
row
n Co
ve
1 W
ayfin
ding
The
dire
ctio
nal s
ign
is in
tuiti
ve fo
r vas
t maj
ority
of w
ould
-be
aud
ienc
e
130
G.
12
75 a
nd C
oron
ado
Cays
Bl
vd
1 W
ayfin
ding
Not
wor
th th
e co
st a
nd th
e cl
utte
r as t
he st
ate
beac
h de
stin
atio
n is
obvi
ous
131
G.
12
75 a
nd C
oron
ado
Cays
Bl
vd
1 W
ayfin
ding
Not
wor
th th
e co
st a
nd th
e cl
utte
r as t
he st
ate
beac
h de
stin
atio
n is
obvi
ous a
nd th
e De
l is v
isibl
e ju
st a
noth
er
mile
or s
o up
the
path
03
/01/
16
154
Exhi
bit C
– P
ictu
res o
f Sig
ns P
rovi
ded
by C
ounc
ilmem
ber B
aile
y (d
escr
iptio
n in
serte
d by
staf
f)
War
ning
War
ning
W
arni
ng
War
ning
W
arni
ng
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Gui
de
Gui
de
Reg
ulat
ory
War
ning
03/0
1/16
155
Exhi
bit C
– P
ictu
res o
f Sig
ns P
rovi
ded
by C
ounc
ilmem
ber B
aile
y (d
escr
iptio
n in
serte
d by
staf
f)
War
ning
War
ning
W
arni
ng
War
ning
War
ning
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Gui
de
Reg
ulat
ory
Unc
ateg
oriz
ed
03/0
1/16
156
Exhi
bit C
– P
ictu
res o
f Sig
ns P
rovi
ded
by C
ounc
ilmem
ber B
aile
y (d
escr
iptio
n in
serte
d by
staf
f)
War
ning
W
arni
ng
War
ning
W
arni
ng
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Gui
de
Unc
ateg
oriz
ed
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
03/0
1/16
157
Exhi
bit C
– P
ictu
res o
f Sig
ns P
rovi
ded
by C
ounc
ilmem
ber B
aile
y (d
escr
iptio
n in
serte
d by
staf
f)
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
War
ning
/Reg
ulat
ory
War
ning
W
arni
ng
War
ning
War
ning
U
ncat
egor
ized
Reg
ulat
ory
03/0
1/16
158
Exhi
bit C
– P
ictu
res o
f Sig
ns P
rovi
ded
by C
ounc
ilmem
ber B
aile
y (d
escr
iptio
n in
serte
d by
staf
f)
War
ning
R
egul
ator
y R
egul
ator
y
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Gui
de
Gui
de
Gui
de
Reg
ulat
ory
Gui
de
Gui
de
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
Reg
ulat
ory
03/0
1/16
159
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
160
CITY MANAGEMENT’S APPROACH, PRINCIPLES, APPLIED TECHNIQUES AND TIMELINE FOR PREPARATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FY 2016-17 FINANCIAL PLAN
ISSUE: Whether to provide guidance on the approach and principles to be used to prepare the FY 2016-17 budget.
RECOMMENDATION: Receive report on the recommended approach and principles for preparing the FY 2016-17 financial plan and provide further direction as needed.
FISCAL IMPACT: This is an information item. There are no costs associated with the preparation of the report. The budget is a cornerstone of the City’s fiscal stability and policy directive.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: This is an administrative action. The City Council has broad discretion in providing direction on the preparation of its financial plans.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: The preparation and presentation of a budget is a cornerstone of municipal management. Among other things, the approved budget is a policy document expressing the City Council’s goals and priorities for the coming year in the provision of government services; a financial plan, showing the budgetary fund structure and configuration of how these funds are appropriated; and a communication device, conveying information on significant budgetary issues and trends.
Attached to this report is a list of general approaches that will be used to prepare the FY 2016-17 budget which is scheduled for presentation on May 17, 2016. The list will be included in the published budget document after its adoption.
The listed approach, principles, and applied techniques are intended to help Coronado manage its fiscal assets in FY 2016-17 and beyond.
Submitted by City Manager King, Administrative Services/Krueger Attachment: Approach, Principles, Applied Techniques and Timeline for Preparation and
Management of FY 2016-17 Financial Plan
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR JK JNC MLC NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03/01/2016
161
11g
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
162
Approach, Principles, Applied Techniques and Timeline for Preparation and Implementation of FY 2016-17 Financial Plan
1) Basic assumptions, such as revenue and expenditure growth assumptions, will be reviewed with the City Council on March 15, 2016, as part of a multi-year financial projection.
2) The basic budget model, to the degree practical, will continue to be a line item budget. With some exceptions, line items in the FY 2015-16 budget will be the base for FY 2016-17. Line item budgets are the most common and familiar budget types and lend themselves to simplicity, especially with small and lean fiscal management staffs.
3) The Required Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) will continue to constitute the budget of the Successor Agency to the Community Development Agency (SA). Depending on whether the State Department of Finance allows for all administrative cost reimbursements, there may be an advance needed from the City to the Successor Agency in order to finance the administrative costs of the agency. Advances for administrative costs become payment obligations of the Successor Agency in future ROPS periods. The SA will not be included as part of the budget process unless there are resources or expenditures that will be made in the FY 2017 budget.
4) Because the court has still not resolved the question of whether the loans made by the General Fund to the Community Development Agency can be prepaid, it will be assumed for budget purposes that any prepayment amount will not be available until the final court determination.
5) Separate funds (General Fund sub-funds) will continue to be used for the activities of the Community Development and Recreation Departments. Staff will continue to assess the appropriate level of fees and services in order to arrive at the appropriate level of General Fund support for these non-General Fund departmental activities. In addition, consideration will be given to reducing General Fund support if the funds are generating sufficient revenue to fund operations and sustain a reasonable reserve. The recreation department staff is developing a business model that will reflect the expanded service levels for the new Spreckels Center and Lawn Bowling Green venue.
6) With the increase in the existing tax base revenues, Public Safety services will receive the first consideration for additional expenditures supported by long-term revenue capacity.
7) Changes in any department organization will be presented with the proposed Financial Plan.
8) The December 2015 adoption of the Facilities and Asset Management Funding Formula superseded the physical asset set-aside formula established in February 2013. Contributions to facilities will be budgeted pursuant to the 2015 adopted formula.
03/01/2016
163
9) After the Facilities and Asset Funding Formula allocation has been made, and after General Fund operating expenditures have been budgeted, then, based upon remaining unallocated General Fund revenues, an allocation for General Fund Capital Improvement Projects for FY 2016-17 will be considered.
10) In addition to the formulaic funding and any other CIP funding authorized by the City Council, staff will also propose a transfer from the General Fund of $61,000 to the CIP Fund 400. This amount represents accumulated revenue from transportation mitigation fees paid by property developers. The funds will be applied to appropriate street and road projects in the Fiscal Year 2016-17 Capital Improvement Program.
11) Treasury management is a complex process that includes a view to maximizing investment return over the long and short-term and also providing an optimum level of confidence that the city's cash resources are securely invested. Consideration will be given to minimizing the cost of managing the city's investment resources in this upcoming budget.
12) The FY 2015-16 budget included a newly created Cultural Arts Fund. This fund was adjusted to more accurately reflect the expected revenues (e.g., donations and event proceeds) and expenditures related to cultural arts activities in the FY 2016 budget. In the FY 2016-2017 budget, there will be a continued need to examine the optimum funding level for this program in order to balance the desired level of service within the resources available to accomplish this.
13) The basic financial plan goals for FY 2016-17, as in prior years, will be to maintain service levels and to present a budget that matches 12-month expenditures to 12-month revenues.
14) Continual system improvements will be sought including considering contracting for services and/or alternative service delivery, when appropriate, and where clear service improvements and cost improvements can be realized. Priority will be given to business practices and strategic planning efforts that result in savings, increased efficiencies, or improved revenues.
15) Employee compensation for three bargaining groups will be budgeted in accordance with adopted agreements. Base salary costs for non-unionized and self-represented employees will be budgeted two percent higher than FY 2015-16, reflecting the base salary increases of the police and fire bargaining groups.
16) Community Group funding will be programmed at the 2015-16 fiscal year level.
17) The budget for pension costs will be over budgeted to match the hypothetical rate that would have been charged by CalPERS if Coronado had not made lump sum prepayments.
03/01/2016
164
At year-end, the anticipated remaining excess funds will be distributed to the pension stabilization fund.
18) The activities, programs and costs related to the Spreckels Center will be included in the budget plan.
19) Emphasis will be given to watching, caring, and monitoring the tax base.
20) Performance and service satisfaction will be monitored and evaluated.
21) Maintenance of Coronado’s physical assets will continue and will not be deferred.
22) With the exception of the Storm Drain Fund 530, enterprise activities are expected to be self-supporting. Staff will be seeking direction in FY 2016-17 on the long-term funding strategies for the Storm Drain fund. In the preparation of the budget for FY 2016-17, additional loans or contributions from the General Fund will be required to fund the activities in the Storm Drain fund associated with the City’s National Pollutant Discharge Elimination Permit.
23) Fee increases for enterprise activities will be recommended as soon as any long-term structural deficit is revealed in order to allow for the smallest and most gradual increase possible. Fees will continue to be considered where appropriate to allow General Fund activities to remain healthy and vibrant, targeted towards identified uses, with a strong nexus between the service and users in accordance with the requirements of AB 1600 and California law. Appropriate reserves will be maintained as required by the City Council Reserve Policy last revised in June 2013. As required by the GASB Pronouncement No. 54 on fund balance reporting, the amounts of committed and assigned reserves will be updated as needed prior to July 1, 2016.
24) A budget workshop, along with a review of the proposed Community Grants, will be held on May 17. Budget adoption will be on June 6 or June 20, 2016.
03/01/2016
165
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
166
REVIEW AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2014 ANNUAL TRAFFIC REPORT
RECOMMENDATION: Review and accept the 2014 Annual Traffic Report.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
CITY COUNCIL AUTHORITY: Review and direction related to a study is an administrative matter not affecting a fundamental vested right. When an administrative decision does not affect a fundamental vested right the courts give decision makers greater deference in administrative mandate actions. The courts will inquire (a) whether the City has complied with the required procedures, and (b) whether the City’s findings, if any, are supported by substantial evidence.
PUBLIC NOTICE: None required.
BACKGROUND: Section 56.03.014 of the Coronado Municipal Code states that “the City Engineer, in cooperation with the Police Department, shall annually prepare a traffic report which shall be filed with the City Council. Such a report shall contain information on traffic matters in this City as follows:
A. Traffic accident data, including the number of traffic accidents, the number of persons killed and the number of persons injured;
B. The number of traffic accidents investigated and other pertinent data on the safety activities of the City; and
C. The plans and recommendations of the City staff for future traffic safety activities.”
ANALYSIS: The City’s Public Services & Engineering and Police Departments monitor accident records on a regular basis and formally report these statistics for each calendar year as required by the Municipal Code. Although accident reports are generated locally, they are required to be sent to the State of California where the accident information is geo-coded and categorized. The City’s Engineering staff typically downloads the accident data used for generation of the annual report from the State of California to benefit from the geo-coding and categorization work and as a result, generation of the annual report can, at times, be delayed. However, staff does not wait for the report to be completed before investigating accident trends or safety concerns when observed. In addition, the City’s Bicycle Advisory Committee reviews all bicycle-related accidents on a monthly basis with representatives from both the Public Services & Engineering and Police Departments.
The 2014 report is summarized in an executive summary, but some of the conclusions contained in the report are as follows:
• The number of reported accidents decreased from 259 in 2013 to 196 in 2014.• No accidents resulting in fatalities were reported in 2014.
03/01/16
167
11h
• The average traffic volume entering/leaving the City on a daily basis increased to 94,218 vehicles per day compared to 94,100 vehicles per day in 2013 (roughly a 0.2% increase).
• No City street intersections experienced three or more accidents during 2014. ALTERNATIVE: The City Council may ask staff to provide additional analysis not currently included in the report. Submitted by Public Services & Engineering/Katzenstein Attachment: 2014 Annual Traffic Report N:\All Departments\Staff Reports - Drafts\2016 Meetings\03-01 Meeting SR Due Feb. 18\FINAL 2014 Annual Traffic Report Staff Report.doc CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G BK TR NA JNC MLC NA EW MB N/A JF CMM N/A
03/01/16
168
ANNUAL TRAFFIC REPORT
ANNUAL TRAFFIC & ACCIDENT REPORT
PUBLIC SERVICES & ENGINEERING
2014
169
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................. 2
QUICK FACTS FOR 2014 ............................................................................................................ 2
TRAFFIC VOLUME AND ACCIDENT TRENDS ............................................................................ 3
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... 5
TRAFFIC VOLUME ...................................................................................................................... 5
OVERALL VOLUME ENTERING AND LEAVING CORONADO ................................................. 5
WEEKDAY VS. WEEKEND TRAFFIC PATTERNS........................................................................... 8
TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS ............................................................................................................... 10
NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS ......................................................................................................... 10
ACCIDENT LOCATIONS ........................................................................................................... 12
TYPES OF ACCIDENTS .............................................................................................................. 14
TIMES OF ACCIDENTS .............................................................................................................. 15
PRIMARY COLLISION FACTORS .............................................................................................. 16
ACCIDENTS RESULTING IN FATALITIES .................................................................................... 17
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCIDENTS ................................................................................ 17
CONCLUSIONS REGARDING ACCIDENTS IN CORONADO ................................................... 18
APPENDIX A – ISSUES PRESENTED TO THE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS COMMITTEE IN 2014 ........ 21
ATTACHMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 23
2014 COLLISIONS MAP (The Village) ..................................................................................... 23
2014 COLLISIONS MAP (The Cays) ........................................................................................ 24
2014 PEDESTRIAN & BIKE COLLISIONS MAP (The Village) ................................................... 25
2014 PEDESTRIAN & BIKE COLLISIONS MAP (The Cays) ...................................................... 26
2010-2014 BIKE COLLISIONS MAP (The Village) ................................................................... 27
2010-2014 BIKE COLLISIONS (The Cays) ................................................................................ 28
2010-2014 PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS (The Village) ............................................................... 29
2010-2014 PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS (The Cays) .................................................................. 30
170
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This summary is intended to provide the reader with quick facts regarding traffic circulation and accidents within Coronado during 2014. For a more complete summary, as well as an analysis of the presented data, please refer to the main content of the report.
Incorporated in 1890, the City of Coronado has a population of approximately 23,400 per data collected in the 2010 census. City streets, along with state highways 75 and 282, total over 47 miles of roadway within city limits. Directing traffic along these roadways are 15 traffic signals; all but one are owned, operated, and maintained by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The City of Coronado controls the signal at the intersection of Orange Avenue and First Street.
As the home of two naval bases, three world-class resorts, and a golf course that regularly ranks among the best of its class in California, the City of Coronado welcomes more than two million visitors every year. Due to the city’s unique location within San Diego Bay, vehicular access to and from the city is limited to two routes along State Highway 75, which are the San Diego-Coronado Bridge and the Silver Strand. Because of this, the City of Coronado, in coordination with Caltrans, is able to monitor the number of vehicles entering and leaving the City on a daily basis. Traffic volumes entering and leaving the City, as well as certain accident-related data, are summarized below for the year 2014.
QUICK FACTS FOR 2014
94,218 vehicles, on average, entered and/or left Coronado each day. o 72,882 via the San Diego-Coronado Bridge. o 21,336 via the Silver Strand.
196 traffic accidents were reported within City limits.
o 0 resulted in fatalities. o 108 resulted in injuries. o 31 included a pedestrian or bicyclist. o 17 resulted from DUIs (Driving Under the Influence).
Primary factors for traffic accidents in ranking order.
1. 49 Auto Right-Of-Way violations. 2. 40 Improper Turning violations. 3. 34 Unsafe Speed Incidents.
171
3
TRAFFIC VOLUME AND ACCIDENT TRENDS
Although the City of Coronado is considered to be built out, traffic patterns can vary as they are heavily influenced by naval operations, such as the arrival and departure of aircraft carriers and other supporting staff and equipment. However, during 2014, city streets and state highways in Coronado experienced roughly the same number of average annual daily trips (AADTs) as observed in 2013.
Compared against historical data collected since 1977, the year 2014 ranks as the eleventh highest in terms of annual traffic volume in Coronado. The greatest traffic volume to date was recorded in 2002, which is the year the toll booths at the foot of the Coronado Bridge were decommissioned. A five-year trend is presented in Table 1 below. Historical data collected since 1977 is presented in Table 5 (see INTRODUCTION).
TABLE 1: FIVE-YEAR TRAFFIC VOLUME TREND
YEAR BRIDGE AADT* (x1000)
ANNUAL DIFFERENCE
STRAND AADT* (x1000)
ANNUAL DIFFERENCE
TOTAL AADT* (x1000)
TOTAL ANNUAL
DIFFERENCE
2014 72.9 -0.8% 21.3 +3.4% 94.2 +0.2% 2013 73.5 +0.6% 20.6 +0.5% 94.1 +0.6% 2012 73.0 0.0% 20.5 +0.5% 93.5 +0.1% 2011 73.0 -2.7% 20.4 -2.5% 93.4 -2.7% 2010 75.0 +2.7% 20.9 -6.7% 95.9 +0.6%
* Average Annual Daily Trips
In 2014, a total of 196 traffic accidents were reported within Coronado city limits. Table 2, below, shows the five-year trend in accidents reported by the Coronado Police Department.
TABLE 2: FIVE-YEAR ACCIDENT SEVERITY
ACCIDENT SEVERITY 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 AVERAGE
Fatal 2 2 0 0 0 1 Severe Injury 6 5 6 4 6 5 Other Visible Injury 39 34 29 42 33 35 Complaint of Pain 47 49 73 69 69 61 Property Damage Only 76 87 161 144 88 111
TOTAL 170 177 269 259 196 214
172
4
It is important to note that the increase in the number of reported accidents in 2012 was primarily attributed to an adjustment in the Police Department’s procedures regarding the reporting of accidents regardless of how minor the magnitude of the damage. As of 2012, all incidents where a police officer arrived on scene are reported rather than the prior practice of only reporting accidents that resulted in fatalities, personal injuries, or significant property damage.
Each reported collision within the City is categorized by the Coronado Police Department. This data, along with similar data for the last five years, is listed in the following table.
TABLE 3: FIVE-YEAR ACCIDENT TYPE TREND COLLISION TYPE 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 AVERAGE
Auto/Auto 113 117 198 190 110 146 Auto/Bicycle 14 21 25 23 20 21 Auto/Pedestrian 6 8 13 8 11 9 Hit & Run 26 34 56 59 34 42 Single Vehicle 25 30 32 19 55 32 DUI 15 21 19 21 17 19
TOTAL* 199 231 343 320 247 268 * Not annual total; may exceed annual total.
The majority of traffic accidents continue to occur on state highways within city limits with 127 of reported accidents on state highways and only 62 reported on city streets. A map showing the locations of traffic accidents throughout Coronado during 2014 has been provided at the end of this report in the attachments section.
It is important to note that while the total average daily traffic entering and leaving Coronado has increased by approximately 75% since 1977, the number of reported traffic accidents has decreased by approximately 62% during the same time frame. This trend continues to be attributed to one or more of the following reasons:
1) Traffic control measures implemented by the City of Coronado and/or Caltrans have had positive impacts,
2) Traffic enforcement practices have had positive impacts, 3) Drivers have become more aware of their surroundings within Coronado city limits
and are driving more appropriately, and/or 4) Accidents are not being reported to the Coronado Police Department as much
as they were in prior years.
173
5
INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Coronado Municipal Code, Section 56.03.014, the City Engineer files an Annual Traffic Report with the City Council. According to the Municipal Code, the report shall contain the following:
A. Traffic accident data, including the number of traffic accidents, the number of persons killed, and the number of persons injured;
B. The number of traffic accidents investigated and other pertinent data on the safety activities of the City; and
C. The plans and recommendations of the City staff for future traffic safety activities.
This report covers a review time period from January 1 to December 31, 2014. The statistical data regarding traffic accidents used to prepare the report are collected and analyzed using a computer program called Crossroads. This program provides staff with a platform to organize accident data within a Global Positioning System (GPS)-linked database that allows accident data to be easily sorted and analyzed. Crossroads also allows staff to download accident information relevant to the City of Coronado from the State of California Highway Patrol as it becomes available, eliminating a significant amount of staff time that would otherwise be required to manually input the data. Data downloaded from the California Highway Patrol is based on information taken from the Coronado Police Department accident reports, which are required to be submitted to the State.
Although not required by the Coronado Municipal Code, the Annual Traffic Report also includes traffic volume data. While the City of Coronado is built-out, traffic patterns can significantly vary depending upon the season and the number of civilian and military personnel reporting to the local navy bases. The volume data is primarily used by City staff to understand local traffic patterns, but it can also be used to calculate accident rates along City streets to better understand the severity of safety issues that may be identified as a result of this report.
TRAFFIC VOLUME
OVERALL VOLUME ENTERING AND LEAVING CORONADO
There are two locations to enter or leave the City of Coronado by automobile: 1) State Route 75 via the San Diego-Coronado Bridge (commonly referred to as “the Coronado Bridge”) and 2) State Route 75 via the Silver Strand. Coronado is fortunate that both locations have been monitored by Caltrans using permanent traffic count stations for numerous years. These count stations are located within the toll plaza at the base of the bridge and near Gate 3 of the Naval Amphibious Base (NAB) at Tarawa Road along State
174
6
Route 75. The data is continuously collected and can be used to analyze daily, weekly, monthly, or Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes. The AADT, reported as the number of vehicles per day, is calculated by taking the total traffic volume for the year and dividing it by 365 (the number of days in one calendar year).
On average, 94,218 vehicles arrived in or departed Coronado on a daily basis - a volume that was very similar to that observed in 2013 (only a 0.2% increase from 2013). Two-way traffic entering and leaving the city through the San Diego – Coronado Bridge reached an average of 72,882 vehicle trips per day; entrance and departure trips via the Silver Strand contributed an average of 21,336 vehicle counts per day. The number of vehicles entering or leaving Coronado, on average, during 2014 is further detailed in Table 4.
TABLE 4: AADT ENTERING AND LEAVING CORONADO DURING 2014 LOCATION ENTERING LEAVING COMBINED TOTAL
Coronado Bridge 36,428 36,454 72,882 Silver Strand 10,924 10,412 21,336
TOTAL 47,352 46,866 94,218 * The differences in average volumes entering and average volumes leaving are due primarily to inaccuracies of counting equipment and the margin of error introduced when averaging values.
Historical AADT data beginning in 1977 for the Coronado Bridge and the Silver Strand is listed in Table 5 along with a graphical representation of that same data in Graph A in the following pages.
The data presented in the table and graph illustrate that current traffic volumes on the Coronado Bridge are more than double what they were in 1977; however, current traffic volumes experienced along the Silver Strand are very similar to that experienced nearly 40 years ago.
TABLE 5: HISTORICAL ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (AADT) ENTERING & LEAVING CORONADO
YEAR BRIDGE
AADT (x1000)
ANNUAL DIFFERENCE
STRAND AADT
(x1000) ANNUAL
DIFFERENCE TOTAL AADT
(x1000)
TOTAL ANNUAL
DIFFERENCE 2014 72.9 -0.8% 21.3 +3.4% 94.2 +0.2% 2013 73.5 +0.6% 20.6 +0.5% 94.1 +0.6% 2012 73.0 0.0% 20.5 +0.5% 93.5 +0.1% 2011 73.0 -2.7% 20.4 -2.5% 93.4 -2.7% 2010 75.0 +2.7% 20.9 -6.7% 95.9 +0.6% 2009 73.0 0.0% 22.3 +2.2% 95.3 +0.5% 2008 73.0 0.0% 21.8 -5.5% 94.8 -1.3% 2007 73.0 -1.0% 23.0 -2.2% 96.0 -1.3%
(CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE)
175
7
(CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
YEAR BRIDGE
AADT (x1000)
ANNUAL DIFFERENCE
STRAND AADT
(x1000) ANNUAL
DIFFERENCE TOTAL AADT
(x1000)
TOTAL ANNUAL
DIFFERENCE 2006 73.7 -2.6% 23.5 0.0% 97.2 -2.0% 2005 75.6 -0.5% 23.5 -8.5% 99.1 -2.4% 2004 76.0 +3.9% 25.5 -9.8% 101.5 +0.5% 2003 73.0 -5.5% 28.0 +11.8% 101.0 -0.7% 2002 77.0 +6.5% 24.7 +1.2% 101.7 +5.2% 2001 72.0 +2.9% 24.4 +3.3% 96.4 +3.0% 2000 69.9 +1.3% 23.6 -3.4% 93.5 +0.1% 1999 69.0 -2.9% 24.4 +4.9% 93.4 -0.9% 1998 71.0 +1.4% 23.2 +2.6% 94.2 +1.7% 1997 70.0 0.0% 22.6 -1.8% 92.6 -0.4% 1996 70.0 +5.7% 23.0 -1.3% 93.0 +4.0% 1995 66.0 0.0% 23.3 -0.9% 89.3 -0.2% 1994 66.0 +1.5% 23.5 -2.1% 89.5 +0.6% 1993 65.0 -3.1% 24.0 -6.3% 89.0 -3.9% 1992 67.0 +6.0% 25.5 +7.5% 92.5 +6.4% 1991 63.0 +0.3% 23.6 +3.4% 86.6 +1.2% 1990 62.8 +2.5% 22.8 -3.1% 85.6 +1.1% 1989 61.2 +8.5% 23.5 -6.4% 84.7 +4.4% 1988 56.0 +6.3% 25.0 +4.0% 81.0 +5.6% 1987 52.5 -1.0% 24.0 -4.2% 76.5 -2.0% 1986 53.0 +7.5% 25.0 +6.4% 78.0 +7.2% 1985 49.0 +6.1% 23.4 +1.7% 72.4 +4.7% 1984 46.0 +5.0% 23.0 +3.9% 69.0 +4.6% 1983 43.7 +7.3% 22.1 +7.2% 65.8 +7.3% 1982 40.5 +4.2% 20.5 0.0% 61.0 +2.8% 1981 38.8 +3.4% 20.5 -2.0% 59.3 +1.5% 1980 37.5 +2.7% 20.9 -1.0% 58.4 +1.4% 1979 36.5 0.0% 21.1 -4.7% 57.6 -1.7% 1978 36.5 +9.6% 22.1 +5.4% 58.6 +8.0% 1977 33.0 N/A 20.9 N/A 53.9 N/A
176
8
WEEKDAY VS. WEEKEND TRAFFIC PATTERNS
Using the data provided by the Caltrans permanent count stations along State Route 75 near the Coronado Bridge and along the Silver Strand, City staff is able to analyze traffic patterns for both weekdays and weekends. As is the case in most cities, traffic volumes during the week tend to be significantly higher and more predictable than those experienced during the weekend. This is particularly true in Coronado due to the relatively high volume of weekday commuter traffic heading to and from the two naval bases located on the island compared to the volume of local and visitor traffic experienced on the weekends. Weekend traffic tends to be more affected by seasonal influences (beach season being the primary seasonal influence) and specific activities that bring residents from other nearby cities. For these reasons, most engineering analyses performed by City staff focus on weekday, or “five-day,” traffic volumes.
The following graphs show the five-day and weekend average traffic volumes calculated for each month of 2014 using the data collected at both the Coronado Bridge (Graph B) and the Silver Strand (Graph C).
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
AADT
(IN
THOU
SAND
S)
GRAPH A: AADT ENTERING & LEAVING CORONADO
CORONADO BRIDGE SILVER STRAND COMBINED TOTAL
177
9
77,78
2
81,61
8
82,66
4
82,92
5
82,26
5
84,41
2
86,78
5
88,98
2
83,88
0
81,84
4
80,19
2
77,33
2
50,57
2
56,06
3
59,97
3
59,23
2
63,93
2
64,18
7
67,82
7
68,50
2
63,62
1
56,59
1
52,77
0
57,99
0
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
AADT
GRAPH B: 2014 WEEKDAY VS WEEKEND TRAFFIC VOLUMES- CORONADO BRIDGE -
WEEKDAY AVERAGE WEEKEND AVERAGE
22,45
4
23,40
4
24,26
3
24,26
1
23,95
8
24,32
7
24,79
7
25,36
2
24,47
9
23,79
5
23,25
5
21,84
6
13,50
2
15,26
5
16,00
7
15,90
7
17,10
5
17,41
3
18,09
1
18,22
0
16,79
7
15,11
8
14,20
2
14,84
1
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
AADT
GRAPH C: 2014 WEEKDAY VS WEEKEND TRAFFIC VOLUMES- SILVER STRAND -
WEEKDAY AVERAGE WEEKEND AVERAGE
178
10
Based on the available data, the average daily traffic volume on the Coronado Bridge during 2014 was 82,557 vehicles on weekdays and 60,105 on weekends. The average daily traffic volume along the Silver Strand was 23,850 vehicles on weekdays and 16,039 on weekends. These figures indicate that traffic in Coronado is, on average, 28% higher on weekdays than on the weekends.
TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS
A total of 196 traffic accidents were reported in Coronado during 2014, where 108 of them resulted in injuries; no fatalities were reported. The number of accidents, locations, types of vehicles involved (including cyclists and pedestrians), primary collision factors, and the time of year when accidents occurred have been recorded and summarized in this report to better understand accident trends on city streets in an attempt to identify areas and aspects in need of improved safety measures.
NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
The most recent 30 years of accident data is provided in Table 6, which is presented in the following pages. Graph D illustrates the historical trends for injury accidents (including fatalities, which are reported as injury accidents, if any were reported during the year), accidents resulting in property damage only, and the combined total. The complete graph is also shown in the following pages.
When reviewing recent accident records and trends it is important to note that, in 2012, the Coronado Police Department implemented new traffic accident reporting procedures which require a written report whenever a traffic collision is reported and/or an officer responds to the scene of a reported collision. In the past, there were times when a collision resulted in only minor property damage and the involved parties exchanged information without an official written report. These new procedures contributed to an increase in the number of reported accidents in 2012.
The significant decrease in the overall number of traffic accidents reported each year since 1977 is due, in large part, to a reduction in the number of reported Property Damage Only accidents. Property Damage Only accidents are calculated by subtracting injury accidents from the total number of accidents reported. Compared to 2010, which is the year with the fewest reported accidents at 170, 2014 ranked as number seven in terms of fewest reported accidents with only 196 reported. In contrast, 1978 was the year with the most reported traffic accidents at a total of 519 reports.
179
11
TABLE 6: HISTORICAL DATA FOR TOTAL NUMBER OF REPORTED ACCIDENTS IN CORONADO
YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS INJURY ACCIDENTS* PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY ACCIDENTS
INJURY PROPENSITY
2014 196 108 88 55% 2013 259 115 144 44% 2012 269 107 162 40% 2011 177 90 87 51% 2010 170 97 73 57% 2009 195 99 96 51% 2008 184 101 83 55% 2007 195 98 97 50% 2006 225 85 140 38% 2005 205 82 123 40% 2004 233 90 143 39% 2003 231 98 133 42% 2002 243 89 154 37% 2001 245 102 143 42% 2000 194 65 129 34% 1999 223 107 116 48% 1998 224 71 153 32% 1997 309 110 199 36% 1996 266 108 158 41% 1995 302 105 197 35% 1994 321 103 218 32% 1993 380 119 261 31% 1992 390 111 279 28% 1991 408 132 276 32% 1990 409 130 279 32% 1989 328 105 223 32% 1988 408 125 283 31% 1987 338 127 211 38% 1986 399 147 252 37% 1985 334 125 209 37% 1984 376 135 241 36% 1983 384 195 189 51% 1982 374 138 236 37% 1981 432 171 261 40%
(CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE)
180
12
(CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS PAGE)
YEAR TOTAL ACCIDENTS INJURY ACCIDENTS* PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY ACCIDENTS
INJURY PROPENSITY
1980 419 155 264 37% 1979 482 171 311 35% 1978 519 150 369 29% 1977 511 120 391 23%
* Includes fatalities if any were reported that year.
ACCIDENT LOCATIONS
Accident locations reported on city streets and state highways have been categorized into eight general areas listed in Table 7 as presented in the following page.
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
1985
1984
1983
1982
1981
1980
1979
1978
1977
ACCI
DENT
S RE
PORT
ED
GRAPH D: REPORTED TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS 1977 TO 2014
TOTAL ACCIDENTS INJURY ACCIDENTS PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY
181
13
TABLE 7: 2014 ACCIDENT LOCATION BREAKDOWN
LOCATION NUMBER
OF REPORTED ACCIDENTS
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL
ACCIDENTS
STATE HIGHWAY THIRD STREET/POMONA AVENUE 27 14% FOURTH STREET 14 7% 300 BLOCK OF ALAMEDA BOULEVARD 0 0% ORANGE AVENUE (THIRD STREET TO POMONA AVENUE) 51 26% SILVER STRAND BOULEVARD (POMONA AVENUE TO IMPERIAL BEACH) 35 18% CITY STREETS VILLAGE AREA 59 30% CORONADO CAYS 3 2% OTHER/PRIVATE PROPERTY 7 4% TOTAL 196 100%
By studying the locations where accidents occur, City staff can focus on improving those areas experiencing problems. The location of each accident is graphically shown on the collision maps included at the end of this report. In order to implement measures that improve traffic safety, it is important to identify locations in the City where multiple accidents occur on a regular basis. While it may not be possible to totally eliminate accidents, it is possible to identify the primary collision factor (PCF) responsible for an accident, determine if a location experiences accidents based on a common cause, and recommend improvements aimed at addressing the common cause.
Caltrans conducts an annual safety audit of its roadways and considers a location as “high incidence” when five or more collisions occur in a 12-month period. However, in 2014 no intersections along state highways experienced five or more accidents.
Traffic volumes on State highways are significantly higher than on most City-owned streets and would therefore typically be expected to experience a higher number of accidents than intersections of local roadways. Such observation is reflected in the following page with Table 8, which compares the amount of accidents that have occurred on State, City, and private property in the last five years.
The Public Services & Engineering Department has established a high-accident threshold of three accidents in order to trigger safety concern reviews for said locations. After analyzing accident data for 2014, it was found that no intersection of City streets experienced three or more accidents during 2014.
182
14
TABLE 8: 5-YR COMPARISON OF ACCIDENTS ON STATE HIGHWAYS VERSUS CITY STREETS
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
# OF
ACCI
DENT
S
% O
F TO
TAL
# OF
ACCI
DENT
S
% O
F TO
TAL
# OF
ACCI
DENT
S
% O
F TO
TAL
# OF
ACCI
DENT
S
% O
F TO
TAL
# OF
ACCI
DENT
S
% O
F TO
TAL
STATE HIGHWAY
96 55% 103 58% 152 57% 129 50% 127 65%
CITY STREET 73 41% 71 40% 109 41% 115 44% 62 32%
OTHER/PRIVATE 7 4% 5 3% 8 3% 15 6% 7 3%
TOTAL 176 100% 179 100% 269 100% 259 100% 196 100%
TYPES OF ACCIDENTS
Tables 9 and 10 respectively detail the accident types and severity reported during 2014 as well as similar data for the time frame since 2010 in order to analyze a recent five-year trend.
TABLE 9: ACCIDENT SUMMARY BY SEVERITY FROM 2010 TO 2014
SEVERITY
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 FIVE-YEAR AVERAGE
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
Fatal 2 1% 2 1% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 0% Severe Injury 6 4% 5 3% 6 2% 4 2% 6 3% 5 3% Other Visible Injury 39 23% 34 19% 29 11% 42 16% 33 17% 35 17%
Complaint of Pain 47 28% 49 28% 73 27% 69 27% 69 35% 61 29% Property Damage Only 76 45% 87 49% 161 60% 144 56% 88 45% 111 52%
TOTAL 170 100% 177 100% 269 100% 259 100% 196 100% 214 100%
183
15
TABLE 10: COLLISION TYPES FROM 2010 TO 2014
COLLISION TYPE
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 FIVE-YEAR AVERAGE
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
% O
F TO
TAL
Auto/Auto 113 57% 117 51% 198 58% 190 59% 110 45% 146 54% Auto/Bicycle 14 7% 21 9% 25 7% 23 7% 20 8% 21 8% Auto/Ped 6 3% 8 3% 13 4% 8 3% 11 4% 9 3% Hit & Run 26 13% 34 15% 56 16% 59 18% 34 14% 42 16% Single Vehicle 25 13% 30 13% 32 9% 19 6% 55 22% 32 12% DUI 15 8% 21 9% 19 6% 21 7% 17 7% 19 7%
TOTAL* 199 100% 231 100% 343 100% 320 100% 247 100% 268 100% *Not annual total. TIMES OF ACCIDENTS
Coronado’s historic accident trend has observed higher collision rates during the summer months when the number of visitors to the island peaks. However, collisions peaked in April during 2014 with a total of 22 (see Graph E) and a considerable decrease in reported accidents was observed from May to the remaining months of the year; the month of November had the fewest accidents recorded with 10. Table 11 holds the year’s monthly data below.
TABLE 11: TYPES OF ACCIDENTS REPORTED DURING 2014
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
TOTA
L Fatal Collisions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Injury Collisions 9 9 9 15 12 4 13 9 6 8 7 7 108 Injuries 14 10 14 17 15 4 23 12 7 11 10 8 145 Auto/Auto 11 10 12 11 9 8 11 12 6 9 5 6 110 Auto/Ped 1 1 1 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 1 1 11 Auto/Bike 3 2 1 7 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 1 20 Auto/Moto 2 1 3 4 1 0 2 1 1 3 1 1 20 Hit & Run 4 4 4 2 3 3 4 2 3 3 1 1 34 DUI 1 3 1 3 0 3 2 1 0 1 2 0 17 Single Vehicle 6 5 4 4 6 8 4 5 3 3 4 3 55 COUNT TOTALS 51 45 49 63 47 30 65 43 28 40 31 28 520 TOTAL COLLISIONS* 21 18 18 22 16 16 21 18 11 14 10 11 196 * Sum of Auto/Auto, Auto/Ped, Auto/Bike, and Single Vehicle collisions.
184
16
Graph E, below, illustrates the monthly collision numbers and distinguishes between “Injury” and “Property Damage Only” occurrences. The trending average of the last five years has been depicted in red in order to compare with the most recent findings.
PRIMARY COLLISION FACTORS
Primary collision factors for all 196 reported accidents within Coronado city limits during 2014 are recorded in Graph F on the following page. Data indicates that the top three primary collision factors in 2014 have continued to remain unchanged since 2012 with Auto Right-of-Way violations being the leading cause of traffic accidents on Coronado streets at 49 reports while 40 Improper Turning occurrences followed as the second leading cause for accidents. Unsafe speed was the third primary collision factor with 34 incidents. Despite the repeated ranking pattern, the number of occurrences dropped from the previous year’s results.
129 9
74
12
8 9
5 63 4
9
9 915
12
4 139
6
8
77
0
5
10
15
20
25
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
NUMB
ER O
F AC
CIDE
NTS
GRAPH E: MONTHLY COLLISIONS IN 2014
PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY INJURY ACCIDENTS 5-YEAR MONTHLY AVERAGE
185
17
ACCIDENTS RESULTING IN FATALITIES
No collisions resulting in fatalities were reported in 2014.
PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE ACCIDENTS
Accidents involving pedestrians and bicyclists can, depending on the location, require a different set of improvements to rectify potential safety issues. With the large number of pedestrians and bicyclists that travel on Coronado streets every day, and the increased risk of injuries or fatalities resulting from these types of accidents, it is important to pay special attention to these types of accidents. Maps showing the locations of all pedestrian and bicycle-related accidents are included as attachments to this report. To determine whether any conclusions – and consequently safety recommendations – can be made at this time, City staff reviewed each individual accident report involving pedestrians and bicyclists. In addition, all bicycle and pedestrian accidents are reported to the City’s Bicycle Advisory Committee at their monthly meetings.
The number of pedestrian-related accidents increased from 8 in 2013 to 11 in 2014. Right-of-way violations were the primary collision factor for 8 of 2014’s incidents. Unlike the previous year where most incidents were attributed to pedestrians failing to enter roadways safely or obey right-of-way controls in place, nearly all of the accidents involving pedestrians were caused by drivers failing to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians. Seven of these incidents took place within intersections while the remaining four took place mid-block. Five of the eleven pedestrian-related accidents took place along Orange Avenue. Of these five, three occurred at signalized intersections with
49
4034
1712 10
5 5 4 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 10
10
20
30
40
50
60
NO. O
F IN
CIDE
NTS
REPO
RTED
GRAPH F: PRIMARY COLLISION FACTORS IN 2014
186
18
protected pedestrian crosswalks. The remaining two occurred at non-signalized intersections that have stop signs on the streets intersecting with Orange Avenue, but no painted crosswalks across Orange Avenue.
A total of 20 traffic accidents involving a bicyclist were reported in Coronado during 2014. For 11 of those instances, the bicyclists were the party at fault while the remaining incidents were caused by the motorist. Out of the 20 bicycle-related collisions, only 9 of them occurred at intersections and 4 of those were due to a right-of-way violation, which was the most common primary collision factor for drivers and bicyclists alike. Although 2014 registered a slight drop in reported collisions involving bicyclists compared to the previous year, right-of-way violations continue to be the leading cause for these types of collisions.
CONCLUSIONS REGARDING ACCIDENTS IN CORONADO
After traffic volumes peaked in 2002, a small decline in traffic volumes on state highways and city streets in Coronado was observed. Since that time slight variations in annual traffic volumes have been noted, however, traffic volumes remain fairly constant. The number of reported traffic accidents varies more from year to year than traffic volume, however, the total number of accidents reported each year has remained under 300 since 1997. This, by no means, indicates that work in the area of traffic safety is complete. As long as collisions continue to occur, City staff will research their causes to see if improvements are attainable.
Having reviewed the data for the year 2014, the following observations and corresponding conclusions can be made:
1) 55 involved a single vehicle. Unfortunately, this type of accident is often caused by driver error and is not easily correctable through traffic control measures.
2) 17 involved Driving Under the Influence (DUI). This represents a drop in the number of DUI accidents since 2013 and is below the 5-year average 19 DUI accidents.
3) 108 accidents resulted in injuries for 145 individuals. This marks a small decrease
in injury accidents when compared to 2013 statistics of 115 accidents and 156 individuals.
4) 11 traffic accidents involved a pedestrian – a total number of accidents that is
above the five-year average of nine. The only location that experienced more than one pedestrian accident within the 12-month time frame was the signalized intersection of RH Dana and Orange Avenue.
Over half of pedestrian-related incidents were the result of right-of-way violations, all but one of which were determined to be the motorist at fault. In most cases
187
19
the accidents took place where there were already signals, stop signs, and/or marked crosswalks. Aside from locations on Orange Avenue, only one of the locations that experienced a pedestrian-related accident in 2014 has experienced one other pedestrian-related accident within the last five years. The intersection of Sixth Street and A Avenue experienced one pedestrian-related accident in both 2013 ad 2014. This location is already all-way stop controlled. Considering these are the only two incidents that occurred within the past five years and improvements are already in place, no new improvements to control traffic seem necessary at this time.
5) 20 traffic accidents involved a bicyclist – less than the five-year average of 21. Each of these accidents have been reviewed with the City’s Bicycle Advisory Committee and further reviewed by City staff. No intersection experienced multiple bicycle-related accidents during 2014; however, two corridors experienced multiple accidents. Fourth Street experienced three bicycle-related accidents; plans for improvements to reduce vehicle speeds and improve pedestrian safety at intersections along Fourth Street are currently being discussed with Caltrans. First Street experienced two bicycle-related accidents near its intersection with I Avenue. In both cases the driver of a vehicle was found to be at fault, making unsafe maneuvers resulting in collisions. First Street already accommodates a Class 2 bike lane providing additional indications for drivers to be aware of the presence of bicyclists. Accident data from the last five years are also reviewed to determine if any trends could be identified. Several corridors were identified as having experienced multiple bicycle-related accidents during the five-year time frame. In most cases, these corridors either already feature significant bicycle improvements or have proposed improvements already identified in the Bicycle Master Plan. In accordance with City Council direction, the Bicycle Master Plan proposed improvements will be reviewed as the plan is updated. A Avenue, which experienced 4 bicycle accidents since 2010, is the only corridor identified that does not currently feature, or have proposed improvements already identified. As a result, it is recommended that A Avenue be considered for additional bicycle improvements when the Bicycle Master Plan is updated.
6) No single intersection of City streets experienced three or more accidents during 2014. As a result, no modifications to existing red curb zones are recommended to maintain compliance with the City’s red curb zone policy.
In conclusion, the City of Coronado continues its efforts to improve safety for pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorists using city streets within its jurisdiction; including the State right-of-way. In conjunction with the Coronado Police Department, the City routinely situates mobile speed radars at various locations throughout the City to
188
20
increase drivers’ awareness of their speed compared to the posted speed limits. The Coronado Police Department also deploys variable message signs (as does Public Services) to alert motorists of traffic incidents or special events. The message signs are also used to deliver brief educational slogans to encourage drivers to obey traffic laws.
Public Services & Engineering staff are continuously looking for ways to improve safety for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians traveling within Coronado’s city limits. Engineering staff typically presents traffic-related safety issues to the City’s Traffic Operations Committee (TOC) on a monthly basis. If recommended by the TOC, these items are either forwarded to the City Manager to determine if they should be placed on a City Council agenda or installed in the field, depending upon the item in question. A complete list of items presented before the TOC during 2014 is included in Appendix A of this report.
189
21
APPENDIX A – ISSUES PRESENTED TO THE TRAFFIC OPERATIONS COMMITTEE IN 2014
FEBRUARY 27, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding the request to install a blue curb in front of “The Landing” condominium complex at 1099 First Street.
2) Recommendation regarding a policy for installation of red curb zones.
MARCH 27, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding right turns onto Pomona Avenue from Fourth Street. 2) Recommendation regarding the current spacing of speed humps on Pomona
Avenue. 3) Recommendation regarding updating the City’s warrants for two-way stop
control at street intersections and yield control at street intersections.
APRIL 24, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding loading zones along Adella Avenue and the Block 4 alley adjacent to the El Cordova Hotel and Oxford Park complex.
2) Recommendation regarding installation of an in-street pedestrian crossing sign at the existing marked crosswalk in the 900 Block of C Avenue.
3) Recommendation regarding a request for analysis of a four-way stop intersection at C Avenue and Fifth Street.
MAY 22, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding the Annual Traffic Report for year 2012. 2) Recommendation regarding a request to install a 20-foot blue curb zone in front
of the residence at 540 C Avenue. 3) Recommendation regarding a request to install a 25-foot blue curb zone and a
10-foot red curb zone in front of the residence at 1005 Adella Avenue.
JUNE 26, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding a request to accommodate valet parking for the commercial establishments in the 100 Block of Orange Avenue.
2) Recommendation regarding a request to install enhanced crosswalk markings and signage at the intersection of Orange Avenue and Seventh Street.
JULY 24, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding a request for four-way stop control at the intersection of C Avenue and Second Street.
2) Recommendation regarding the request to install a blue curb zone in front of the residence located at 1000 Eighth Street.
190
22
3) Recommendation regarding a request to extend a red curb zone on Antigua Court in order to provide emergency vehicle access.
AUGUST 28, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding a request for an additional speed hump on Pomona Avenue near Glorietta Boulevard.
SEPTEMBER 25, 2014
1) Review of conceptual on-street parking modifications to increase vehicular parking for the proposed senior center.
OCTOBER 29, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding a request for a striping modification to Pomona Avenue at Glorietta Boulevard.
2) Recommendation regarding a request to establish fire lane striping in the alley of Block 121.
3) Recommendation regarding a request for red curb zone extensions adjacent to driveways at 333 Orange Avenue.
4) Consideration of a proposed stop and yield sign warrant policy.
DECEMBER 18, 2014
1) Recommendation regarding a request for additional red curb at the intersection of Fifth Street and Orange Avenue.
2) Recommendation regarding the request to install a blue curb zone in front of the residence at 515 Ninth Street.
191
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
192
23
ATTACHMENTS
2014 COLLISIONS MAP (The Village)
193
24
2014 COLLISIONS MAP (The Cays)
194
25
2014 PEDESTRIAN & BIKE COLLISIONS MAP (The Village)
195
26
2014 PEDESTRIAN & BIKE COLLISIONS MAP (The Cays)
196
27
2010-2014 BIKE COLLISIONS MAP (The Village)
197
28
2010-2014 BIKE COLLISIONS (The Cays)
198
29
2010-2014 PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS (The Village)
199
30
2010-2014 PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS (The Cays)
200
CONSIDERATION OF COUNCILMEMBER BAILEY’S REQUEST TO AGENDIZE CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION TO AMEND CORONADO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 1.84 TO FOLLOW FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES COMMISSION (FPPC) GUIDELINES REGARDING FORMS OF POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS
Please see attached request from Councilmember Bailey.
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03/01/16
BK
201
13a
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
202
203
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
204
CONSIDERATION OF COUNCILMEMBER BAILEY’S REQUEST TO AGENDIZE CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION TO AMEND CORONADO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 1.84.010 TO ALLOW POLITICAL FUNDRAISERS IN THE CITY OF CORONADO TO FOLLOW GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 82015
Please see attached request from Councilmember Bailey.
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03/01/16
BK
205
13b
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
206
February 8, 2016
Dear Mayor Tanaka, Fellow City Councilmembers, Mr. King, and Ms. Canlas:
Pursuant to City Council Policy #2, I would like to have an agenda item brought forward which would update and modernize Coronado Municipal Code Chapter 1.84.010, to allow political fundraisers in the City of Coronado to follow the exclusion set forth in Government Code Section 82015.
Government Code Section 82015 (f) (1) states: “contribution” does not include a payment made by an occupant of a home or office for costs related to any meeting or fundraising event held in the occupant’s home or office if the costs for the meeting or fundraising event are five hundred dollars ($500) or less.
Our current ordinance, which was passed in 1994, limits fundraising events in a private home or office to $100. This poses a problem, because political fundraisers costing in excess of $100 should include the fair rental value of the premises for the period of the fundraiser as a nonmonetary contribution. Given the high values of Coronado real estate, it is quite likely that the fair rental value of any property would exceed $200, which would inadvertently cause an illegal nonmonetary contribution in excess of $200.
Surveying the municipal codes of nearby cities, I have learned that Coronado is the only city that restricts home and office fundraisers to $100:
City Allowable forms of contribution
City of Chula Vista Municipal code does not restrict home or office fundraisers.
City of Del Mar Municipal code does not restrict home or office fundraisers.
City of Imperial Beach
Municipal code does not contain a campaign finance ordinance. Therefore, the city follows state rules.
City of San Diego Municipal code does not restrict home or office fundraisers.
City of Solana Beach Municipal code does not restrict forms of contributions.
National City
Municipal code does not contain a campaign finance ordinance. Therefore, the city follows state rules.
03/01/16
207
Councilmember’s Recommended Action: Amend Coronado Municipal Code Chapter 1.84.010 to allow political fundraisers in the City of Coronado to follow Government Code Section 82015. Sincerely, Richard Bailey City Councilmember
03/01/16
208
209
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
210
CONSIDERATION OF COUNCILMEMBER SANDKE’S REQUEST TO AGENDIZE A DISCUSSION TO AMEND THE CORONADO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW LEASHED DOGS IN BAY VIEW PARK
Please see attached request from Councilmember Sandke.
CM ACM AS CA CC CD CE F L P PSE R/G NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
03/01/16
BK
211
13c
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
212
213
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
214
CONSIDERATION OF COUNCILMEMBER BAILEY’S REQUEST TO AGENDIZE CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION CONCERNING EXTENDING THE SIDEWALK ON OCEAN DRIVE TO INCLUDE THE PERIMETER OF SUNSET PARK THAT BORDERS OCEAN DRIVE
03/01/16
215
13d
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
216
February 16th 2016 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers - I would like to request Council consider extending the existing sidewalk on Ocean Dr. to include the perimeter of Sunset Park that borders Ocean Dr. and end at the corner of Ocean Blvd and Ocean Ct (see image below). The existing sidewalk currently dead ends into Sunset Park requiring pedestrians to either walk on the grass, Ocean Dr, or to cross the street to use another sidewalk. Extending the existing sidewalk would make the park and beach more accessible for those with reduced mobility while also allowing pedestrians with dogs to walk to dog beach without crossing the park grass and violate city ordinance.
A mockup of the sidewalk was shared on social media and received a generally favorable response from the people that expressed an opinion.
I would like staff to prepare a report for Council’s consideration.
Councilmember
Richard Bailey
Existing Sidewalk
Proposed Sidewalk
03/01/16
217
