35
A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on : Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for Studying the Sources of Variation in Program Effects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(3). 1

A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

1

A Framework for StudyingVariation in Program Effects

June 14, 2015Michael J. Weiss

Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual Framework for Studying the Sources of

Variation in Program Effects. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(3).

Page 2: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

2

Outline

Section I: Introduction

Section II: Proximal Sources of Variation in Program Effects

Section III: Connecting the Treatment Contrast to Program Implementation & Treatment Fidelity

Page 3: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

3

Section 1

Introduction

Page 4: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

4

Consequences of Effect Variation

• Targeting services (types of clients / locations)

• Equity / fairness• Best case / worst case scenarios• Generalizability / Scaling• Research design–What research questions to address?– Sample size– Etc.

Page 5: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

5

Three Motivating Studies

• After School Programs– certain types “work” (sequenced activities, active

learning, limited # of goals, activities tied to goals)

• Charter Schools– certain types “work” (clear behavior standards,

zero-tolerance, coaching new teachers)

• Welfare-To-Work– certain types “work” (counseling to get jobs quick,

personalized attention)– context mattered (low unemployment rate larger

effects)

Page 6: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

6

DEFINING A PROGRAM EFFECT FOR AN INDIVIDUAL

Section 1: Introduction

Page 7: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

7

Weight Loss Program

No Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnNeyman

Neyman

Page 8: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

8

ESTIMATING THE AVERAGE PROGRAM EFFECT FOR A GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS

Section 1: Introduction

Page 9: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

9

Estimating the Average Program Effect

Randomize individuals (or groups) to: 1. Receive program offer2. Not receive program offer

Compare two group’s average future outcomes

Page 10: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

10

DEFINING VARIATION IN PROGRAM EFFECTS

Section 1: Introduction

Page 11: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

11

Weight Loss Program

No Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnNeyman

Neyman

Weight Loss Program

No Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnRubin

Rubin

Page 12: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

The Framework

Outcomes

Treatment Contrast

Program Effect

12

Treatment Offered

Take-up

Treatment Offered

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation Process

Client Characteristics and Context

Characteristics of Implementing Organization

Implementation Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el

Take-up

OutcomesTreatment Received

Treatment Received

Page 13: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

13

Section 2

Proximal Sources of Variation in Program Effects

Page 14: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

14

The Three C’s

1. Treatment Contrast

2. Client Characteristics

3. Program Context

Page 15: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

15

1. THE TREATMENT CONTRAST

Section 2: Proximal Sources of Variation in Program Effects

Page 16: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

16

Weight Loss Program

No Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnNeymanContrast 1

Neyman

Weight Loss Program

Alternate Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnNeymanContrast 2

Neyman

Page 17: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

Treatment Contrast and Program Effect

Treatment Received

Outcomes

Outcomes

Treatment Received

Treatment Contrast

Program Effect

17 Client Characteristics and Context

Characteristics of Implementing Organization

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el Treatment Offered

Take-up

Take-up

Treatment Offered

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el

Outcomes

- Employment - Achievement - Recidivism - etc.

Outcomes

- Employment - Achievement - Recidivism - etc.

Treatment Received

- Content - Quantity - Quality - Conveyance

Mediators

Treatment Received

- Content - Quantity - Quality - Conveyance

Mediators

Page 18: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

18

2. CLIENT CHARACTERISTICS

Section 2: Proximal Sources of Variation in Program Effects

Page 19: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

19

Weight Loss Program

No Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnHigh-risk Type

High-Risk

Weight Loss Program

No Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnLow-risk Type

Low-Risk

Page 20: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

Client Characteristics as Moderators

Treatment Received Outcomes

Treatment Contrast

Program Effect

OutcomesTreatment Received

20 Client Characteristics and Context

Characteristics of Implementing Organization

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el Treatment Offered

Take-up

Take-up

Treatment Offered

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el

Page 21: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

21

Author’s Suggestions (Client Characteristics as Moderators)

1. Risk• E.g., pre-test, pre-RA income level

2. Readiness• E.g., acknowledgment of problem

(substance abuse)

3. Program Theory• E.g., age (adult education that relies on

technology)

Page 22: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

22

3. PROGRAM CONTEXT

Section 2: Proximal Sources of Variation in Program Effects

Page 23: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

23

Weight Loss Program

No Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnNeymanContext 1

Neyman

Weight Loss Program

No Program

Potential Outcome

Potential Outcome

ProgramEffectOnNeymanContext 2

Neyman

Page 24: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

Context as a Moderator

Treatment Received

Outcomes

Outcomes

Treatment Received

Treatment Contrast

Program Effect

24 Client Characteristics and Context

Characteristics of Implementing Organization

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el Treatment Offered

Take-up

Take-up

Treatment Offered

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el

Page 25: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

25

Section 3

Connecting the Treatment Contrast to Program Implementation and Treatment Fidelity

Page 26: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

26

FROM TREATMENT OFFERED TO TREATMENT RECEIVED: CLIENT TAKE-UP

Section 3: Connecting the Treatment Contrast to Program Implementation and Treatment Fidelity

Page 27: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

Client Take-Up

Treatment Received

Outcomes

Outcomes

Treatment Received

Treatment Contrast

Program Effect

27 Client Characteristics and Context

Characteristics of Implementing Organization

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el Treatment Offered

Take-up

Take-up

Treatment Offered

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el

Page 28: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

28

Author’s Suggestions (Strategies to Increase Client Take-Up)

1. Incentives / Inducements • ASAP’s MetroCard tied to attending advising

sessions

2. Requirements / Mandates • Opening Doors required student success course

3. Remove Barriers• H&R Block’s FAFSA simplification• 401(k) saving plans “opt-out”

4. Improved Outreach• High school to college transition, summer

outreach

Page 29: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

29

FROM TREATMENT PLANNED TO TREATMENT OFFERED: PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION

Section 3: Connecting the Treatment Contrast to Program Implementation and Treatment Fidelity

Page 30: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

Program Implementation

Treatment Received

Outcomes

Outcomes

Treatment Received

Treatment Contrast

Program Effect

30 Client Characteristics and Context

Characteristics of Implementing Organization

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el Treatment Offered

Take-up

Take-up

Treatment Offered

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el

1

2

3

Page 31: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

31

Treatment Plan

Definition: Planned content, quantity, quality & conveyance of treatment services for clients

• The plans for “what, how much, how, and by whom?” of treatment

• Varies in specificity

1

Page 32: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

32

Implementation Plan

Definition: Set of instructions for how the treatment plan is to be realized

Worth Considering:• Staff recruitment and selection• Staff training• Staff monitoring and supports

2

Page 33: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

33

Implementing Organization(Author’s Suggestions )

1. Strong Leadership

2. Resources / Capacity

3. Supportive Culture / Climate

4. Involvement of Outside Monitor or “Fixer”

3

Page 34: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

Treatment Fidelity

Treatment Received

Outcomes

Outcomes

Treatment Received

Treatment Contrast

Program Effect

34 Client Characteristics and Context

Characteristics of Implementing Organization

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el Treatment Offered

Take-up

Take-up

Treatment Offered

Treatment Fidelity

Implementation ProcessImplementation

Plan

Treatment Planned

Prog

ram

Mod

el

Page 35: A Framework for Studying Variation in Program Effects June 14, 2015 Michael J. Weiss Based on: Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2014). A Conceptual

35

A Framework for StudyingVariation in Program Effects

Michael J. Weiss Howard S. Bloom Thomas Brock [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]