STATEMENTS BY FOREIGN MISSIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS_1-13 APRIL 2014

13 April 2014 – NATO – NATO Secretary General concerned about escalation in eastern Ukraine

I am extremely concerned about the further escalation of tension in Eastern Ukraine. We see a

concerted campaign of violence by pro-Russian separatists, aiming to destabilise Ukraine as a

sovereign state. The reappearance of men with specialised Russian weapons and identical

uniforms without insignia, as previously worn by Russian troops during Russia`s illegal and

illegitimate seizure of Crimea, is a grave development.

I call on Russia to de-escalate the crisis and pull back its large number of troops, including special

forces, from the area around Ukraine`s border.

Any further Russian military interference, under any pretext, will only deepen Russia`s international

isolation.

Details: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_109148.htm

 13 April 2014 – NATO – “De-escalation starts on the ground” Article by the NATO Secretary General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen

 My first speech as NATO Secretary General in 2009 was called "NATO and Russia: A New

Beginning." My aim was to develop a true strategic partnership with Russia, extending practical

cooperation in areas where we share security interests, while insisting that Russia should fully

comply with its international obligations, including respecting the territorial integrity and political

freedom of its neighbours.

 Through the years, we made significant progress, working together on areas such as counter-

terrorism, counter-piracy and security in Afghanistan. But Russia’s annexation of Crimea ended

that new beginning, and undermined the very basis of the partnership we had built with such great

efforts.

 Today, Russia is speaking and behaving not as a partner, but as an adversary.

 While tens of thousands of combat-ready Russian troops stand poised on Ukraine`s border,

Russia is also waging a propaganda war the like of which we have not seen since the end of the

Cold War. Its purpose is to pervert the truth, divert attention from Russia`s illegal actions, and

subvert the authorities in Ukraine.

 In recent weeks, Russian officials have accused NATO of breaking its promises, interfering in

Ukraine’s internal affairs, and escalating the crisis. It is time to see these claims for what they are:

a smokescreen designed to cover up Russia`s own broken promises, interference and escalation.

 Broken promises

 Russia accuses NATO of breaking a 1990 promise that it would never expand into Central and

Eastern Europe. At different times, Russian leaders have attributed the promise to private

statements by Germany’s former Chancellor Helmut Kohl and Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich

Genscher, and then-U.S. Secretary of State James Baker.

 But in 1990, the only discussion was about the reunification of Germany. NATO enlargement was

not on the agenda, as the Warsaw Pact only dissolved a year later. Moreover, any such pledge

would have had to lead to a change of NATO`s founding treaty made by consensus of all Allies.

 The reality is that no such pledge was ever made, and Russia’s leaders have failed to produce a

single document to back up this oft-repeated claim. Since it was founded, NATO has embraced

sovereign states who made their free choice to join the Alliance. That is the spirit of democracy.

 Over the past seventy years, Russia has repeatedly promised to respect the sovereignty, territorial

integrity and political independence of all states. It did so, for example, when it signed the United

Nations Charter of 1945, the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 and the NATO-Russia Founding Act of

1997.

 Russia is now violating Ukraine’s territorial integrity by occupying Crimea, and violating Ukraine’s

sovereignty by trying to impose a federal system. Russia has broken its word. It has done damage

to its reputation that will take years to heal. Blaming NATO will not make that better; it will make it

worse.

 Interference

 Russian leaders also claim that NATO has interfered in Ukraine’s internal affairs by pushing the

country towards membership.

 NATO’s track record shows how false that is. When Ukraine expressed the aspiration to join the

Alliance ten years ago, we welcomed Ukraine`s aspiration. When Ukraine opted for non-bloc

status, five years ago, we respected Ukraine`s decision. When Prime Minister Yatseniuk recently

visited Brussels, he made clear that membership “is not on the radar.” That is Ukraine`s sovereign

choice - and NATO fully respects it.

 Meanwhile, Russia has repeatedly tried to define, even dictate, Ukraine’s course. Top officials

have demanded that the constitution be rewritten to create a federal state. They have demanded

that Ukraine declare itself neutral, to safeguard Russia’s security.

 This contradicts one of the fundamental principles of Euro-Atlantic security: that each state is free

to choose its own alliances. The Soviet Union accepted that principle when it signed the Helsinki

Accords in 1975; Russia inherited the obligation.

 Only Ukraine can decide what is best for Ukraine - in full respect for all the people of Ukraine,

whatever language they speak. Other countries may help to facilitate dialogue, but they cannot

decide on Ukraine’s behalf.

 If Russia is sincere about a dialogue, the first step should be to pull back the tens of thousands of

troops it has deployed on Ukraine`s border without any justification. Otherwise, any talks would not

be a dialogue, but diktat.

 Escalation

 Russian officials allege that NATO has escalated the crisis by moving military forces to Central

and Eastern Europe and publicly condemning Russia’s actions. Foreign Minister Lavrov even

wrote that “de-escalation starts with rhetoric.”

 The reality is that actions speak louder than words: escalation and de-escalation both start on the

ground.

 Since the crisis began, Russia has occupied Crimea with thousands of troops and staged a rigged

referendum That is clearly escalation. NATO has offered to support the Ukrainian government’s

defence reforms and boost the transparency and democratic control of the armed forces. That is

clearly not escalation.

 Russian forces have seized Ukrainian military bases and warships. That is escalation. NATO has

sent civilian experts to advise Ukraine on the security of critical infrastructure. That is not

escalation.

 Russia has moved some 40,000 troops to Ukraine’s border, backed up by tanks, fighters, artillery

and attack helicopters: escalation. NATO has launched AWACS radar aircraft flights over Poland

and Romania and sent six extra aircraft to the Baltic States to protect Allied airspace: not

escalation.

 Dispelling the smokescreen

 The Russian propaganda against NATO and the West is nothing but smokescreen to cover up its

own illegal actions. Dispel the smokescreen, and the truth on the ground is clear: Russia has

annexed Crimea at the barrel of a gun, in breach of all its international commitments..

 Russia is now isolated in the world, its international credibility in tatters. This is not in Russia’s

interest.

 Russia faces a choice: to stop blaming others for its own actions, pull back its troops, step back

into line with its international obligations and start rebuilding trust.

 Otherwise, Russia will only face deeper international isolation. That is in nobody’s interest, and will

make our world only more dangerous and unpredictable.

 I call on Russia to de-escalate. There are concrete steps to be taken.

Details: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/opinions_109102.htm?selectedLocale=en

11 April 2014 -  The United States – Treasury Announces New Sanctions Related to Ukraine

The U.S. Department of the Treasury`s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) April 11

designated Crimean separatist leaders Pyotr Zima, Aleksei Chaliy, Rustam Temirgaliev, Yuriy

Zherebtsov, Mikhail Malyshev, and Valery Medvedev, former Ukrainian official Sergey Tsekov, and

Crimea-based gas company Chernomorneftegaz pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 13660. These

individuals and this entity are being sanctioned for being responsible for or complicit in, or having

engaged in, actions or policies that undermine democratic processes or institutions in Ukraine,

actions or policies that threaten the peace, security, stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity of

Ukraine, or misappropriation of state assets of Ukraine or of an economically significant entity in

Ukraine; or having asserted governmental authority over any part or region of Ukraine without the

authorization of the government of Ukraine.

“Crimea is occupied territory. We will continue to impose costs on those involved in ongoing

violations of Ukraine`s sovereignty and territorial integrity,” said Under Secretary for Terrorism and

Financial Intelligence David S. Cohen.

 Details: http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/treasury-04112014.html

11 April 2014 - The United States – Ukraine in the White House Daily Press Briefing

MR. CARNEY:  Well, as you know, the President spoke with Chancellor Merkel yesterday from Air

Force One about the concerning situation in eastern Ukraine.  We continue to see there that pro-

Russian separatists, apparently with support from Moscow, continue an orchestrated campaign of

incitement and sabotage to undermine and destabilize the Ukrainian state.  And we remain

concerned about increased Russian pressure on Ukraine overall.  And we saw similar protest

activities in Crimea before the Russian intervention and illegal annexation, so this of course if

cause for concern.

The President and the Chancellor talked about the need for Russia to move its troops back from

the border region.  In Crimea, we also continue to call for Russia to withdraw its forces, which are

violating Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.  As we have said, we will hold Russia

accountable for its actions in Ukraine, whether overt or covert.

We call on President Putin and his government to cease all efforts to destabilize Ukraine, and we

caution against further military intervention.  We remain prepared to impose further costs on

Russia for its actions or further provocations. 

When it comes to NATO and the important work underway to reassure NATO allies, the United

States has urgently been stepping up on a bilateral basis to reassure our NATO allies who are

most concerned by the Russian intervention in Ukraine and Russia’s buildup of military forces.  To

date, those efforts have been mostly taken advantage -- have mostly taken advantage of existing

missions, such as deploying 12 additional F-16s to our aviation training detachment to Poland, and

augmenting our contribution to the NATO-Baltic Air Policing Mission with six additional F-16s.

As you know, while in Europe, the President asked those NATO allies who are capable of making

similar contributions to do so as quickly as possible.  This was done with a view to moving this

discussion more formally into NATO channels by tasking NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander,

General Breedlove, at the NATO Foreign Ministerial to develop additional measures to enhance

our collective defense and ensure a coordinated and continuous additional land, air, and sea

presence in the region from now through at least the end of the year.  In other words, moving from

an ad-hoc “coalition of the ready” approach to a more concerted and strategic look at what NATO

can and should do to bolster its Article 5 obligations and assurances. 

In other words, we’ve taken a lot of steps to reassure our NATO allies.  We have had discussions

with, when the President was in Europe and since, our partners on other contributions that our

NATO allies can make in the effort to reassure the alliance and those nations that are

understandably most concerned by Russia’s actions in Ukraine. 

Details: http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/wh-ukraine-04112014.html

11 April 2014 - The European Union – EU pays €19 million in Budget Support for environment and border management

The European Commission has executed three payments today in favour of the Ukrainian

Government for a total of €19.075 million, of which €14.775 million for meeting agreed targets in

border management and €4.3 million for environmental protection.

The payments were made on the basis of progress achieved in the Ukrainian national policies in

these fields, as assessed by the European Commission, in line with the conditions agreed between

the EU and the Ukrainian Government in the Financing Agreement (FA) signed in 2011.

The Commission`s assessment showed that Ukraine fulfilled five conditions (performance

indicators) out of total nine in implementing the Environment Sector Budget Support Programme,

for example the development of regional programmes on environmental protection or simplification

of the environmental authorisation system. Some indicators like modernisation of the waste

management infrastructure or stabilising the emissions of pollutants and greenhouse emissions in

the air did not meet the targets agreed in the FA. Therefore €4.3 million out of a potential €10

million was paid.

Assessment of the eleven specific conditions foreseen in the FA for the Border Management

Sector Policy showed that Ukraine partially or fully fulfilled seven conditions out of total eleven

including the establishment of the eCustoms system and decrease by 20% waiting time at state

border. Some indicators such as decreasing the level of corruption, progress in border demarcation

or creating telecommunication and online networks between the border guard and the customs

were not achieved. Therefore €9.75 million out of a potential €17 million was paid as a first variable

tranche in addition to a fixed tranche of €5 million.

Mr Andrew Rasbash, the Head of Co-operations in the EU Delegation to Ukraine, said, "These

very timely payments are part of the ongoing cooperation between Ukraine and the EU. The

precise amounts reflect reform "performance" in previous years… The relatively limited amount

paid (€13 million was "lost") reflects the fact that agreed targets for sectorial reform were not met to

a very significant extent..."

Background: How does the European Commission provide budget support?

The Commission generally provides budget support using a combination of fixed (general)

tranches linked to eligibility criteria, and variable (specific) tranches that are also linked to progress

in meeting agreed targets in for example health, education, or public financial management.

Budget support involves policy dialogue, financial transfers to the national treasury of the partner

country, performance assessment and capacity-building, based on partnership and mutual

accountability. It should not be seen as an end in itself, but as a means of delivering better aid and

achieving sustainable development objectives by fostering partner countries` ownership of

development policies and reforms. It addresses the source, not just the symptoms, of under-

development, and provides the platform on which to engage in a broad policy dialogue with partner

country on key development issues.

Details : https://www.facebook.com/EUDelegationUkraine/posts/723707717673859:0

10 April 2014 - The United States – Readout of the President’s Call with Chancellor Merkel of Germany

THE WHITE HOUSE

Office of the Press Secretary

President Obama spoke today with Chancellor Merkel about the concerning situation in eastern

Ukraine, where pro-Russian separatists, apparently with support from Moscow, continue an

orchestrated campaign of incitement and sabotage to undermine and destabilize the Ukrainian

state.  The leaders again called for Russia to move its troops back from the border region.  They

also discussed issues relating to the forthcoming meeting of the Ukrainian, Russian, and U.S.

foreign ministers and EU High Representative.  The two leaders commended the Ukrainian

government’s efforts to move forward on constitutional reform, decentralization, and democratic

elections and emphasized the importance of the international community’s strong financial support

for Ukraine.  The President underscored the need for the United States, European Union, and

other global partners to be prepared to meet further Russian escalation with additional sanctions. 

The President and the Chancellor look forward to continuing their discussion during her

forthcoming visit to Washington.

Details: http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/obama-merkel-04102014.html

10 April 2014 - The United States – Transatlantic Security Challenges: Central and Eastern Europe

Testimony

Victoria Nuland

Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs

Statement Before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee

As prepared

Chairman Murphy and Ranking Member Johnson – I am honored to be here today to testify on the

security challenges facing the Transatlantic community in Central and Eastern Europe. Let me

begin by thanking you for your leadership in the passage of the Support for the Sovereignty,

Integrity, Democracy and Economic Stability of Ukraine Act. This legislation, which was supported

by every member of this subcommittee, will enable the United States to provide needed help to

Ukraine as the country undertakes its difficult transition.

I would also like to thank you for your visits to the region. I know that Chairman Murphy and

Senator McCain have traveled to Kyiv twice in the past 5 months, and that Senator McCain --

along with Ranking Member Johnson, Senator Barrasso, and others -- will travel to the Baltic

states and Moldova this weekend. This engagement demonstrates America’s continuing bipartisan

support for a Europe whole, free and at peace.

For over 20 years, the United States and our European Allies have worked to integrate Russia

more closely into the Euro-Atlantic community through our bilateral engagement and organizations

like the OSCE, the WTO and the NATO-Russia Council. Russia’s actions in Ukraine are an affront

to this effort and fundamentally change the security landscape of Eastern and Central Europe.

Today I appreciate the opportunity to discuss the impact of Russia’s actions on Ukraine, our policy

response to their actions and other challenges in the region.

Russia’s occupation of Crimea, rubberstamped by an illegitimate referendum conducted at the

barrel of a gun, has tarnished its credibility and diminished its international standing in the eyes of

Ukrainians and the world. Reports of human rights abuses in Crimea since the Russian occupation

have shocked the conscience. Russia has also attempted to intimidate Ukrainians by amassing

more than 40 thousand troops and quick strike aircraft along the border, and with trade blockades

and gas price hikes of 80 percent.

This week’s violent occupation of government buildings in Kharkhiv, Donetsk, and Luhansk deepen

our concern. Far from a spontaneous set of events, these incidents bear all the hallmarks of an

orchestrated campaign of incitement, separatism and sabotage of the Ukrainian state, aided and

abetted by the Russian security services.

So today Ukraine is a frontline state in the struggle for freedom and all the principles the

Transatlantic community holds dear. The United States stands with Ukraine in its efforts to forge its

own path forward to a more free, peaceful, and unified future. Our approach includes four pillars:

first, our bilateral and multilateral support for Ukraine; second, the costs we are imposing on

Russia for its aggressive actions; third, our efforts to deescalate the crisis diplomatically; and

fourth, our unwavering commitment to the security of our NATO Allies who also live on the

frontlines of this crisis. Let me address the first three briefly. Assistant Secretary Chollet will

address the fourth in his testimony.

First, we support the Ukrainian people and the transitional government in the courageous steps

they are taking to restore economic health, democratic choice and internal stability and security to

the country. The Rada has passed landmark anti-corruption measures, deficit reduction measures

and taken difficult steps to reform the energy sector. These necessary reforms will require painful

sacrifices from all Ukrainians. But they also open the way to an IMF package of up to $18 billion in

support.

The United States stands ready to help as the country addresses its immense challenges. Our $1

billion loan guarantee, in conjunction with IMF and EU assistance, will help implement these

reforms and will cushion some of impact on the most vulnerable in Ukrainian society.

And we have approximately $92 million in FY 2013 State/USAID funding and an anticipated $86

million in FY 2014 State/USAID funding for assistance to Ukraine in areas such as strengthening

anti-corruption efforts, revising public procurement legislation, introducing agriculture and energy

sector reforms, deepening privatization efforts, improving the transparency and quality of higher

education and helping Ukraine prepare for free, fair elections on May 25th.

We are also working with the international community to push back against Russian propaganda,

lies and efforts to destabilize Ukraine’s regions. The OSCE has already deployed more than 120

monitors in ten locations throughout Ukraine as part of a special monitoring mission and the

mandate allows the mission to grow to 500. The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and

Human Rights will also play an essential role by sending 1000 observers for the Presidential

election, one of its biggest missions ever.

Second, Russia is already paying a high price for its actions, and that cost will go up if its pressure

on Ukraine does not abate. Across the board, Russia has found itself isolated. The United States

along with all other G-7 members declined to attend the Sochi G-8 Summit and suspended

participation in G-8 activities. Instead, the G-7 will meet in Brussels. On March 27th, the United

States and 99 other countries in the UN General Assembly reaffirmed the unity and territorial

integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders. Only 11 voted against. Along with

our Allies, we have suspended practical cooperation between NATO and Russia. We have

suspended most bilateral economic and military cooperation and much of the work of the U.S.-

Russia Bilateral Presidential Commission. The President signed two Executive Orders authorizing

sanctions against those responsible, and finding that the actions and policies of the Russian

government undermine democratic process and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security,

stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets.

These sanctions have been carefully coordinated with the EU and other global partners. And today

we are considering further measures in response to Russia’s continued pressure on Ukraine.

And the financial markets are reacting. The ruble has fallen. Capital flight from Russia is at a high

not seen in years. And Russia has been downgraded by major credit rating agencies on account of

its actions.

These costs will only increase if Russia does not change course.

At the same time, we want to try to de-escalate the crisis. Secretary Kerry has met three times with

Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov in recent weeks, with the support of the Ukrainian government at

a time when Russia would not meet directly with Ukraine. Earlier this week, Russia agreed to sit

down next week with Ukraine, the EU and U.S. to discuss de-escalation, demobilization, support

for elections and constitutional reform. Between now and then, we have made it clear that Russia

needs to take concrete steps to disavow separatist actions in Eastern Ukraine, pull back its forces

outside the country, and demonstrate that they are prepared to come to these discussions with the

goal of de-escalating the conflict.

So Russia has a choice—to work with the international community to help build an independent

Ukraine that can meet the hopes and aspirations of all Ukrainians, or Russia can face greater

isolation and economic cost.

We are also concerned about the pressure this crisis is putting on Moldova, Georgia, Armenia,

Azerbaijan and other neighbors of Ukraine. Moldova in particular has been the victim of economic

pressure from Russia, intense Russia-sponsored propaganda against its choice to associate with

the EU and renewed separatist efforts in Transnistria and Gagauzia. As you know, we have

intensified U.S. political and economic support to Moldova, and other states of the region in recent

months and this effort will be sustained.

The Ukraine crisis highlights another deep and growing challenge in the Euro-Atlantic space. The

Maidan protestors had many grievances. But one of the most galvanizing across Ukraine was the

pervasive corruption that has infused every aspect of Ukraine’s politics, economy and social fabric

for too long. And as Secretary Kerry highlighted at the Munich Security Conference, we are seeing

a similar disturbing trend in too many parts of Central and Eastern Europe and the Balkans now

“where the aspirations of citizens are … being trampled beneath corrupt, oligarchic interests” who

“use their money and influence to stifle political opposition and dissent, to buy politicians and

media outlets, weaken judicial independence and the rights on NGOs.”

We are also seeing a growing league of oligarchs and corrupt politicians work together, including

across national lines, to protect and help each other maintain that influence, and keep the cash

flowing that feeds their preferred system. Corruption of this kind doesn’t just rot democracies from

the inside, it also makes them vulnerable to corrupting influences outside country who seek undue

economic and political influence over state policies and decision-making. In other words, in many

parts of Europe, fighting corruption needs to be a higher national priority in order to protect and

defend democracy AND state sovereignty.

As we look to shore up the security, prosperity and values that are vital to our shared aspiration for

a Europe whole free and at peace, therefore, fighting corruption must be a more central line of

effort. Over the coming year, you will see our focus on this intensify in the work we do across the

Balkans, and Central and Eastern Europe, in close collaboration with the with EU, to help these

countries promote clean, accountable government, a lively and free civil society, and media

independence and to help governments and citizens expose and root out corruption wherever it

hides.

Similarly, the Ukraine crisis is a wake-up call to accelerate other work we have been doing to

promote a stronger, more prosperous Transatlantic community. As Assistant Secretary Chollet will

discuss, the renewed need for security vigilance along NATO’s Eastern border means our

European Allies must reverse the downward trend of shrinking defense budgets.

And even as we revitalize our transatlantic security ties, we must also strengthen our economic ties

and accelerate the growth and job creation on both sides of the Atlantic by completing an

ambitious Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership agreement. The work that Eurozone

countries are doing to strengthen the banking system and institute other reforms will also give

investors confidence.

Finally, we must do more together as a Transatlantic community to strengthen Europe’s energy

independence and internal market including guaranteeing reverse flow capabilities; ensuring

greater diversity of supply; enhancing storage capacity and developing a deeper network of import

terminals and interconnectors throughout the continent.

So this crisis has intensified our focus not just on Central and Eastern Europe but on a broad set of

transatlantic security challenges – and opportunities—on the road to a Europe whole, free and at

peace.

We are grateful for the bipartisan and very active support of this subcommittee in that effort. I look

forward to your questions.

Details:  http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/nuland-ukraine-04102014.html

10 April 2014 - The United States – Readout of Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel`s Call with Ukraine`s Acting Minister of Defense Mykhaylo Koval

Assistant Press Secretary Carl Woog provided the following readout:

"Secretary Hagel spoke by phone with Ukraine`s Acting Minister of Defense Mykhaylo Koval on his

return flight to Washington from Beijing. It was their first conversation since the minister took office

last month.

"Secretary Hagel commended Minister Koval for his leadership of the Armed Forces during this

critical time for Ukraine and thanked him for hosting recent bilateral defense consultations in Kyiv.

They discussed the situation in Crimea, as well as Russia`s military activities along Ukraine`s

borders and attempts to destabilize communities in Eastern Ukraine.

"Secretary Hagel told Minister Koval that the United States will continue to stand with Ukraine.

They both pledged to remain in close contact going forward."

Details:   http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/hagel-ukraine-04102014.html

10 April 2014 - The United States – United States Mission to the OSCE. Ongoing Violations of OSCE Principles and Commitments by the Russian Federation and the Situation in Ukraine

As delivered by Ambassador Daniel B. Baer to the Permanent Council, Vienna

It has been 41 days since the Russian Federation began its illegal military actions in Crimea; 24

days since the Russian Federation acknowledged a so-called referendum that was both illegal and

illegitimate; and 20 days since Russia’s lawmakers voted to annex Crimea—an unlawful attempt to

violate Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.  Yet, these dates mark only a handful of the

numerous, destabilizing actions that the Russian Federation has carried out in recent months, thus

undermining Ukraine’s stability and threatening Ukrainian citizens’ unity, peace, and prosperity. 

Russia’s ongoing actions are a caustic chemical, eroding the pillars that have underpinned security

in Europe for a generation.

Since the Russian delegation chose not to join us at the joint FSC/PC meeting on Monday, the

United States reiterates its statement made at that meeting.  The continued buildup of forces along

Russia’s border with Ukraine risks a significant destabilization of European security.  It is in and of

itself a menacing act. We reject the Russian claim that the use of Vienna Document Chapter III

measures by the United States in this instance is “unfounded.”  Our concerns are serious and

genuine.  This unusual Russian military activity has given rise to specific concerns about the

security of at least one OSCE participating State, Ukraine, and has generated questions and

concerns among many other neighbors as well. 

Furthermore, the Vienna Document is this Organization’s signature confidence- and security-

building tool.  Russia has refused to engage in the confidence building measures enshrined in the

Document, which were designed to address security concerns participating States have about the

unusual and unscheduled military activities of another State, and which we all took such great

pains to agree to by consensus.  This blatant disregard for, and disrespect of, this Organization

erodes a key component of the entire European security structure.

In addition to its unusual military activity along Ukraine’s borders, Russia is also supporting a

carefully orchestrated campaign of destabilization of eastern Ukraine.  Events this week in Kharkiv,

Donetsk, Luhansk, and Mariupol were not spontaneous expressions of local discontent with the

government in Kyiv.  There is strong evidence that some of the armed separatists that took over

government buildings in these areas were paid to do so, and were not local residents. 

This combination of military build-up and efforts to destabilize public life in eastern Ukraine is

deeply troubling, and it isn’t fooling anyone.  Russia is clearly attempting to create a pretext for

further intervention in Ukraine.  In the spirit of the Helsinki Final Act, we call upon Russia to: 

- Reverse the illegal purported “annexation” of Crimea and permit the OSCE special monitoring

mission to visit the Crimean region; 

- Draw down the military forces massed on Ukraine’s border;

- Cease all efforts to destabilize Ukraine;

- Publicly disavow the activities of separatists, saboteurs, and provocateurs; 

- Return Russian forces operating on Ukrainian territory in Crimea to their pre-crisis garrisons and

numbers in accordance with existing bilateral agreements between Ukraine and the

Russian Federation;

- Invite additional Vienna Document visits to allow impartial observation by members of the

international community of Russia’s current military activities in the region of the Ukrainian

border; and

- Engage in bilateral dialogue with the government of Ukraine to address any legitimate concerns. 

In short, Russia must start respecting its OSCE commitments.

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Details:  http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/osce-ukraine-04102014.html

10 April 2014 – NATO – NATO Secretary General discusses collective defence, defence investment and Ukraine crisis in Prague

The NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen discussed the Ukraine crisis with the

Prime Minister of the Czech Republic Boshulav Sobotka during a visit to Prague on Thursday (10

April). “From Prague, I have this message to Russia. You have a choice. To stop blaming others

for your own actions. To stop massing your troops. To stop escalating this crisis and start engaging

in a genuine dialogue. If Russia is serious about a dialogue, the first step should be to pull back its

troops”, the Secretary General said at a press conference with Prime Minister Sobotka.

Visiting the Czech Republic as it celebrates the 15th anniversary of its accession to NATO, Mr

Fogh Rasmussen praised the Czech Republic’s commitment to the Alliance: “Your troops have

made a valuable contribution to our missions in Afghanistan and Kosovo. You are fully involved in

our Smart Defence efforts to develop modern military capabilities together.” 

Referring to the crisis in Ukraine, Mr. Fogh Rasmussen said:

“For the first time since countries like the Czech Republic won their freedom, and the Cold War

ended, we see one state trying to grab part of another’s territory at gunpoint. As I speak, some

40,000 Russian troops are massed along Ukraine’s borders. Not training, but ready for combat. We

have seen the satellite images, day after day. Russia is stirring up ethnic tensions in eastern

Ukraine and provoking unrest. And Russia is using its military might to dictate that Ukraine should

become a federal, neutral state. That is a decision which only Ukraine, as a sovereign state, can

make. Nobody else”. 

Mr Fogh Rasmussen stressed that  NATO’s commitment to collective defence is unwavering and

that the Alliance is  taking legitimate steps to deal with the instability that Russia’s illegitimate

actions have created.

Speaking about NATO’s Wales Summit in September, the Secretary General called on all NATO

Allies to keep their  capabilities strong and enhance training for their forces. “Above all, we must

stop the decline of our defence budgets. And start reinvesting in our security. Investing in defence

has a cost. But we see that insecurity has a much higher price”, he said.

 Details: http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_108987.htm

10 April 2014- NATO – Imagery reveals destabilizing Russian forces near Ukraine border

NATO Plans Balanced Response to Reassure Allies

SHAPE, BELGIUM - Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) released a package

of satellite imagery to media outlets from across Europe on Thursday, 10 April 2014, that shows

details of the location and type of Russian units NATO has observed along the border with

Ukraine. NATO assesses that the Russian military has approximately 35-40,000 troops in the

vicinity of the Ukrainian border, a claim Russian officials have repeatedly denied is a cause for

concern.

Brigadier Gary Deakin, the Director of the Comprehensive Crisis Operations and Management

Centre (CCOMC) at SHAPE, spoke to reporters regarding SHAPE’s assessment of the images.

"The Russians have an array of capabilities including aircraft, helicopters, special forces, tanks,

artillery, infantry fighting vehicles… and these could move in a matter of hours,” said Brig. Deakin.

"These forces have a destabilizing effect and present serious implications for the security and

stability of the region,” he added.

SHAPE is observing a small amount of Russian administrative movement on the ground, but the

overall lack of activity is raising flags among military staff. According to Brig. Deakin, Russian units

have moved into the region and are massing in various locations in the vicinity of the border, rather

than conducting specific exercise manoeuvers.

This assessment is shared by the Supreme Allied Commander Europe, General Philip Breedlove,

who said the previous day that he was concerned by the Russian build-up. In speaking about the

Russian force he said: "I would characterize it as a combined arms army… it has all of the

provisioning and enabling that it needs to accomplish military objectives if given them."

SHAPE has submitted a range of options and recommendations to the North Atlantic Council,

through the International Military Staff.

"Essentially what we are looking at is a package of land, air and maritime measures that would

build assurance for our eastern most allies,” said General Breedlove. NATO has repeatedly called

upon Russia to de-escalate the situation by withdrawing troops along Ukraine’s border.

NATO continues to monitor events closely and has prudently increased AWACS surveillance

flights over Romania and Poland in order to maintain awareness of activity in Ukraine. The Alliance

has also significantly increased air policing activity and the number of aircraft dedicated to this

task.

In early April, NATO Foreign Ministers directed SACEUR to develop additional options to reassure

NATO Allies. 

 Details: http://www.aco.nato.int/imagery-reveals-destabilizing-russian-forces-near-ukraine-border-nato-plans-balanced-response-to-reassure-allies.aspx

9 April 2014 - The European Union – Support Group for Ukraine 

The European Commission has decided today to create a Support Group for Ukraine

This Support Group will provide a focal point, structure, overview and guidance for the

Commission`s work to support Ukraine. It will also help mobilise Member States` expertise and

further enhance coordination with other donors and the International Financing Institutions. 

Commissioner for enlargement and neighbourhood policy Stefan Füle will coordinate this Support

Group, which will report to President Barroso and High Representative/Vice- President Catherine

Ashton and will draw on the contributions of all relevant Commission portfolios.

"The European Commission is determined to help Ukraine for the long term.", said President

Barroso. "The Commission has already proposed an overall support package worth of at least €11

billion over the next couple of years and some of these measures are already being rolled out. The

political chapters of the Association Agreement have been signed, sealing the free and democratic

choice of Ukraine to be closely associated with the European Union. Today`s decision to create a

Support Group will ensure that the Ukrainian authorities have all the support they need in

undertaking the political and economic reforms that are necessary to stabilise the country. Our

common goal is to have a democratic, independent and prosperous Ukraine."

In the immediate short-term (until end 2014), the Support Group will identify and coordinate with

the Ukrainian authorities, benefitting from input from the Member States, the technical assistance

that they need to 1) stabilise the fragile financial, economic and political situation in Ukraine; 2)

plan and implement reforms to boost growth and 3) identify reform priorities and advance the

reforms necessary to ensure that immediate benefits can be obtained from the EU offer

(Association Agreement and Visa Liberalisation Action Plan). 

In the medium term (from 2015), the goal of the Support Group will be to further support Ukraine in

the elaboration and implementation of comprehensive reform programmes. 

The work of the Support Group will be based on the "European agenda for reform", a document

prepared with the Ukrainian authorities to match the EU`s short- and mid-term support actions with

Ukraine needs.

Background:

The Support Group will be based in Brussels, with its staff travelling to Ukraine as necessary.

Ukraine will be invited to set up a central co-ordination structure able to oversee the

implementation of the broad reform programme as well as the Association Agreement and to co-

ordinate the work on the creation of the necessary national bodies/structures. 

In addition, a platform for donor co-ordination will be established which will act as the vehicle for

mobilisation of resources and expertise from the broader international environment to support

implementation of these reform priorities

The Support Group will be headed by Mr Peter Balas, currently Deputy Director General in the

Trade Directorate-General. The Support Group will be administratively attached to the Directorate-

General for Development and Cooperation, and shall consist of:

• A Head of Support Group

• Up to 30 full-time officials

• Seconded National Experts

• Temporary agents

• Contract agents

• Special Advisers

The Head of the Support Group shall report to the President and the High Representative/Vice

President under the guidance of the Commissioner for Enlargement and European Neighbourhood

Policy.

The work of the Support Group could be extended also to Georgia and Moldova by a decision of

the President of the Commission and the Vice-President for Personnel.

Details: http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/press_corner/all_news/news/2014/2014_04_10_01_en.htm

9 April 2014 - The United States – Readout of Secretary Kerry`s Call with Foreign Minister Lavrov

Jen Psaki, Spokesperson: In a second phone call today, Secretary Kerry and Foreign Minister

Lavrov discussed the importance of resolving the security situation in key cities in Eastern Ukraine

peacefully and through dialogue and they both rejected the use of force to obtain political

objectives. They also discussed the effort to remove chemical weapons from Syria.

Details:   http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/kerry-lavrov-04092014.html

9 April 2014 - The European Union – Statement by Catherine Ashton’s spokesperson on situation in Eastern Ukraine

The spokesperson of Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and

Security Policy and Vice President of the Commission, issued the following statement:

“High Representative Catherine Ashton is following closely the worrying developments in Eastern

Ukraine, including seizure of public buildings in Kharkiv, Donetsk and Luhansk with use of force.

She commends the Ukrainian authorities for pursuing their law and order operations in a measured

manner.

The High Representative reiterates the strong support of the European Union for Ukraine`s unity,

sovereignty and territorial integrity. She calls against any further destabilisation of Ukraine, whether

from the inside or the outside. Political demands should be addressed in a non-violent way through

appropriate fora. Presidential elections next month need to provide a legitimate and inclusive

platform for citizens to express their views about Ukraine`s future.

It is also of vital importance that Ukraine`s constitutional reform is comprehensive and completed

without delay. The Ukrainian government needs to reach out to the population from east to west of

Ukraine, and ensure that political processes as well as reforms reflect the regional diversity and

respect human and civil rights.

The EU stands by the Ukrainian government in its efforts to stabilise the situation. The High

Representative continues the diplomatic efforts aiming at de-escalating the situation in Ukraine. In

this context she will meet Foreign Ministers of the US, Russian Federation and Ukraine next week. 

The Foreign Affairs Council will assess the latest developments on 14 April.”

Details:  http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/press_corner/all_news/news/2014/2014_04_09_02_en.htm

9 April 2014 - The European Union – President Van Rompuy statement on Ukraine 

Early March, a few days after the invasion of Crimea by Russia, I called an extra informal summit

of EU leaders. Bringing 28 presidents and prime ministers together for a foreign affairs crisis

meeting is not a decision one takes lightly. In fact, it only happened five times in fifteen years – for

instance after "9/11", or to prepare the Libyan intervention. This time too, the stakes were high.

The matter was again at the top of our agenda at the regular March European Council, little over

two weeks ago.

As regards Ukraine, we took an important step. On 21 March, we signed the political parts of the

Association Agreement with Ukraine. It was a strong way to recognise the aspirations of the people

of Ukraine to live in a country governed by values, by democracy and the rule of law, where all

citizens – and not just few – have a stake in national prosperity. We recognise the popular yearning

for a decent life as a nation, for a European way of life. Last November, it was the refusal to sign

that very Association Agreement with the European Union which triggered the Maidan movement –

the “Euro Maidan”. A real democratic uprising by people who had had enough of how they were

governed. A political and cultural shift. A clash of two political cultures.

With the Association Agreement – the remaining economic parts of which will also be signed soon

– the European Union shows steadfast political support for the course the people of Ukraine have

courageously pursued on the way to an open and inclusive democracy. Let me insist: it was their

choice. It was neither imposed nor triggered by manipulation, provocation or violence. An

Association Agreement does not come for free. The contracting country has to meet strict criteria

and benchmarks. We are not offering unconditional loans, as Russia was.

We also decided a number of financial measures to assist the country: substantial macrofinancial

assistance and the temporary and unilateral removal of customs duties for Ukrainian exports to

Europe. We will make this happen as swiftly as possible. The IMF package comes on top of this.

All this will help Ukraine on its path of economic and social reform. It is not an easy road, certainly

not in this time of turmoil and tensions. But – as I said to the Ukrainian Prime Minister during the

signing ceremony – we hope that along this road, the Association Agreement can serve as a

compass.

As regards Russia, all European leaders and the international community have strongly

condemned Crimea’s illegal annexation as a disgrace in the 21st century. Early on EU leaders

decided unanimously on sanctions in three stages. We are in stage two (visa ban, asset freezes).

But we made very clear that failure to settle the crisis peacefully, and any steps by Russia to

destabilise Ukraine, will have far-reaching consequences. And by that we mean consequences on

relations in a broad range of economic areas. In the last European Council meeting we asked the

Commission and the member states to prepare possible further targeted measures. It is a matter of

being ready. There still is unrest in Ukraine, as recent events show, and it must not be exploited by

any party.

Of course, sanctions are not a goal in themselves; they are a means to a goal. The objective is a

negotiated solution, in respect of Ukraine’s sovereignty and international law. This foreign policy

crisis already has internal consequences for Europe – including positive ones. Strikingly, the last

European Council decided to deepen the Union`s energy policy, towards a `energy union` of sorts.

Indeed, we all want to decrease our dependency from Russian gas (which is on average 30%).

Gas is used by Russia as a political instrument. We asked the Commission to come up with a

concrete plan to avoid this energy risk, for instance by working more as a team on gas contracts.

As a matter of a fact, after what happened in Crimea, we must rethink the EU-Russia relationship.

We invested a lot in good relations with Russia the last decade (by supporting its WTO

membership; the Partnership for Modernisation). We were ready to engage on a New Agreement.

Unfortunately, Russia has other objectives and tries to restore a foregone world. But the past will

never come back.

Meanwhile, as European Union we will also continue to strengthen our ties with Georgia and

Moldova. At the March European Council, we decided to bring forward the signature of their full

Association Agreements – to no later than June. The determination is there on their side, and it is

also there on ours, including to withstand likely pressure from Russia not to sign. 

On the Ukrainian situation, we are in close contact with the United States. The extra G7 meeting in

The Hague – in the margins of the Nuclear Security Summit two weeks ago – was a good forum to

coordinate positions. G7 leaders agreed to cancel their participation to the G8 in Sotchi, and

instead to convene for another G7 summit, to be held early June, in Brussels.

As I mentioned, we saw President Obama again two days later, at the EU-US summit in Brussels.

Apart from Ukraine, we addressed many topics – from Iran to data protection to climate. Let me

just mention two topics, that gain in urgency now.

- Energy security: for us it is important to see what we can do together with our American partners

to reduce Europe’s dependency on Russian gas. 

- And transatlantic trade: together with President Obama we reconfirmed our shared commitment

to an ambitious transatlantic trade deal.

In days like these, forging even stronger economic ties across the Atlantic is also a powerful

political sign. A way to show our public opinions and the world who we are at heart: economies

based on rules, societies based on values, and proud of being so. It also shows that the Atlantic

doesn’t belong to the past. The `West` exists; not as in the Cold War, but as a driver for

democracy. The Cold War was ideological and based on fear, obliging countries to make a choice.

That world is no longer, once and for all.

Details:  http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/press_corner/all_news/news/2014/2014_04_09_01_en.htm

8 April 2014 - The United Kingdom – The Foreign Secretary William Hague has expressed grave concern about Crimea and recent events in the east of Ukraine.

Speaking after answering questions on Ukraine in the House of Commons, the Foreign Secretary

said:

The UK government is gravely concerned about the situation in Crimea and in the east of Ukraine,

where armed groups seized government buildings in Donetsk, Kharkiv and Lugansk. There can be

no justification for this action, which bears all the hallmarks of a Russian strategy to destabilise

Ukraine. Russia should be clear that a deliberate and further escalation of the crisis will bring

serious political and economic consequences. I commend the Ukrainian Government for their clear

and determined response so far.

The European Council has asked the Commission to draw up far reaching sanctions in the event of

further escalation by Russia. It is alarming that President Putin has already sought authority to

send armed forces into any part of Ukraine. Russia should be clear that the UK will consider any

armed Russian presence in eastern Ukraine as a further and deliberate escalation.

We will be assessing events in eastern Ukraine carefully over the coming days. The strength and

unity of the EU is vital for upholding a rules-based international system, and the Prime Minister and

I have stressed to European partners the need to accelerate measures that will reduce European

dependence on Russian gas. We are also convening an urgent meeting of G7 energy Ministers to

discuss energy security ahead of the G7 Summit in June.

Details: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/foreign-secretary-concerned-about-situation-in-eastern-ukraine

8 April 2014 - The Nordic Council – The Nordic Council issued the following statement on the situation in Ukraine at its Theme Session in Iceland.

What is needed now is to uphold international law, democracy and human rights

The current situation in the Ukraine and the challenges facing the process of democratisation in the

country were debated at the Nordic Council Theme Session in Akureyri, Iceland, on 8 April.

In 2014, the Nordic countries are celebrating 200 years of peace between them  – a unique period

of regional stability. The importance of this historical phenomenon for the whole Region cannot be

overstated. It has facilitated relationships based on mutual trust and confidence that transcend

national borders, and extensive networks of contacts and co-operation have been established at all

levels.

Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea after a referendum on the peninsula and the country’s

subsequent accession to the Russian Federation are unacceptable and represent a breach of the

Ukrainian constitution. The Nordic Council calls upon the Russian Federation to take measures to

alleviate the tense situation. What happens in South-eastern Europe has an impact on relations in

Northern Europe. The Nordic Council will therefore evaluate and follow developments closely.

The Nordic Council agrees with the statement on the situation in Ukraine issued by the Nordic,

Baltic and Visegrád foreign ministers following their meeting in Narva, Estonia, on 6–7 March 2014.

At parliamentary level, the Nordic Council has consulted with its partners in the Baltic Assembly

and in Poland.

Interest in closer co-operation in the Baltic Sea Region was clearly evident in the dialogue meeting

between the Nordic Council and representatives from the Polish and Baltic parliaments’ foreign

affairs committees.

The Nordic countries must stand together with the rest of Europe on this matter. When the focus

shifts from Crimea to Kiev, Ukraine`s democratisation process will be in great need of support.

The will of the Nordic Council to support Ukraine in this process is based on its long tradition of

support for democracy and the rule of law. Just as the Nordic countries supported the new Baltic

democracies two decades ago, the Nordic Region is today willing to support democracy in Ukraine.

The priority is to find ways of working together to promote democracy. First and foremost, the

Nordic Council will support parliamentary co-operation What is needed now is to uphold

international law, democracy and human rights

Details:  http://www.norden.org/en/news-and-events/news/international-law-serves-as-key-to-statement-on-ukraine 

7 April 7 2014 - The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Canada – Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird today issued the following statement: 

“Canada strongly condemns the agents provocateurs that are fomenting unrest in the three

Ukrainian oblasts of Kharkiv, Donetsk and Luhansk.

“Canada calls for calm and for Ukraine’s territorial integrity to be respected. Russia must not

interfere in the affairs of a sovereign state.

“Russia’s continued provocative actions in Crimea and elsewhere are completely unacceptable.

“If this pattern persists, Russia will continue to face increased isolation from the international

community and suffer further serious consequences as a result of its actions.”

Details:   http://www.international.gc.ca/media/aff/news-communiques/2014/04/07a.aspx

5 April 2014 - OSCE – Statement by OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities

The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities has been closely following developments in

Ukraine since the office was established in 1993 to act as an instrument of conflict prevention at

the earliest stage. The successive High Commissioners have paid particular attention to the inter-

ethnic situation in Crimea, legislation regulating minority rights and language use, and the

education of national minorities.

The High Commissioner’s mandate requires that she works behind the scenes and in confidence.

She therefore issues few public statements. This statement provides an update on her most recent

visits. Currently, High Commissioner Astrid Thors’ main concerns are language policy and the

situation in Crimea.

Thors visited Kyiv, Donetsk, Luhansk and Odessa from 23 to 28 March 2014, and Kiev from 1 to 3

April. She made an earlier visit, which also included a trip to Crimea, on 4 to 6 March as part of a

high-level OSCE delegation together with Ambassador Tim Guldimann, the Special Envoy of the

OSCE Chairperson-in-Office. Her office is also contributing to a Human Rights Assessment

Mission, in co-operation with the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights.

During her most recent two visits, Thors was pleased to hear that the interim Government does not

intend to make any hasty decisions regarding language policy. “There can be no doubt that the

2012 Law on the ‘Principles of the State Language Policy’ remains in force, and, legally, nothing

has changed regarding the status of languages,” she said. “Therefore, there is no need for the

Ukrainian Parliament to rush to make any new decisions. I hope that all political forces can adhere

to this opinion.”

She reiterated her comments made in her public statement of 24 February

[www.osce.org/hcnm/115643] that, to avoid increasing tensions, the authorities should ensure that

the concerns of all ethnic and linguistic groups are taken into account and that consultations also

encompass international organizations to ensure that any new language legislation meets

European standards. She added that time is also needed to evaluate the merits and shortcomings

of the 2012 Language Law, as well as its implementation in practice.

The High Commissioner has been able to speak to a wide range of interlocutors to assess the

situation on the ground. She expressed particular concern that she heard a lot of conflicting

impressions that are contributing to a climate of fear and confusion. Contradictory information

leads to an “information war”. Any measures taken to restrict access to cross-border transmission

of media should strictly comply with international standards, as stated by the OSCE Representative

on Freedom of the Media [www.osce.org/fom/116888]. In addition, many people told her they are

concerned about security and the presence of militarized groups with an unclear status. Thors

commended the interim Government’s efforts to address the security issues in the country,

including the disarmament of armed groups that exist outside of the legal framework, in order to

combat such perceptions.

Thors also remains concerned about the situation in Crimea. Following her statement on 6 March

[www.osce.org/hcnm/116180], the High Commissioner reminded the authorities in effective control

of Crimea that they remain responsible for the human rights, including minority rights, of all

persons residing on the peninsula. “The people in Crimea, in particular the Crimean Tatars and the

Ukrainian community, are in a precarious position. I urge the authorities in effective control to

refrain from actions that exclude people from employment in the public and private sectors or force

them to give up their property.”

She again drew particular attention to The Bolzano/Bozen Recommendations on National

Minorities in Inter-State Relations, which state that while a State might have an interest in

supporting persons belonging to national minorities in other States, “no State may exercise

jurisdiction over the population or part of the population of another State within the territory of that

State without its consent” because “the respect for and protection of minority rights is primarily the

responsibility of the State where the minority resides.” 

Details:  http://www.osce.org/hcnm/117175

4 April 2014 - The Russian Federation – Comment by the Information and Press Department of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on migration topics in the context of Russian-Ukrainian relations

With regard to the initiative of the Consular Service Department of the Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign

Affairs about consultations with Russia regarding the ban on entry of Ukrainian nationals into the

Russian Federation we can make the following statements.

As is known, since January 2013 new norms of the Federal Law No. 114-FZ “On the Procedure for

Exiting and Entering the Russian Federation” of 15.08.1996 are in force, which envisage a ban on

the entry of foreign nationals into Russia for 3 years, if they have violated the rules of stay in its

territory. Moreover, any foreigners, who have violated the regime of stay, the procedure of

employment in the Russian territory several times, or who are held administratively liable for

violations of public order two or three times or of a decision regarding administrative deportation

from the Russian Federation, are banned entry for 5 years.

It is important that this rule concerns all foreigners, who have violated Russian migration law, and

there is no discrimination of Ukrainians here.

It seems to us that the topic of migration must be a subject of discussion between profile agencies

of Russia and Ukraine with the participation of representatives from interested units of the Ministry

of Foreign Affairs of both countries.

Details:  http://www.mid.ru/bdomp/brp_4.nsf/e78a48070f128a7b43256999005bcbb3/7143b1a44471712f44257cb40050de03!OpenDocument

4 April 2014 - The Russian Federation – Comment by the Information and Press Department of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs regarding the act of vandalism in Sumy

The besmearing of monuments in Ukraine continues. Another outrageous act of vandalism was

committed a few days ago in Sumy. Memorial boards were broken, which had been erected to

honour prominent residents of Sumy: Suren Kaftaryan – a historian, who was the first Doctor of

Science in this region, and a Hero of the Soviet Union, military pilot Fyodor Dudnik, who piloted a

bomber in the Kursk Salient, and defended Moscow and Kiev. During the night, evil-doers, using a

sledge hammer, broke marble plates on the house where these people lived and then relieved

themselves on the site.

This is like spitting in the face of veterans of the Great Patriotic War.

We would like to hear the reaction to this outrageous act from a representative of the Ukrainian

Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

  Details: http://www.mid.ru/bdomp/brp_4.nsf/e78a48070f128a7b43256999005bcbb3/8d099279155fc25b44257cb00052bb21!OpenDocument

4 April 2014 - The United States – Letter to the Editor (The Washingon Post) by Ambassador Geoffrey Pyatt: Ukraine — Not the United States or Russia — Will Determine Its Own Future

The April 1 editorial “Shut out ” suggested that the Obama administration is working with Russia on

Ukraine without the participation and input of the legitimate, interim government of Ukraine.

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Secretary of State John F. Kerry has underscored in his meetings with Russian Foreign Minister

Sergei Lavrov the steps Russia must take to deescalate the situation. The administration has been

clear that Russia’s occupation of Crimea is illegal, will not be recognized by the international

community and must be reversed. That is the approach I hear from the Ukrainian government. We

have made no promises beyond that, nor have we engaged in decision-making with Russia over

the future of Ukraine. As President Obama emphasized when Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy

Yatsenyuk was in Washington last month, “We want the Ukrainian people to determine their own

destiny.” That idea has guided U.S. policy from the first days of this crisis.

The Russian government’s illegal “annexation” of Crimea caused this crisis, and the Russian

government’s actions to deescalate tensions will resolve it. It makes sense for Mr. Kerry and Mr. 

Lavrov to talk. But Mr. Kerry put it best when, after meeting with Mr. Lavrov on Sunday in Paris, he

said: “There will be no decisions about Ukraine without Ukraine.” That is how we see it, and we’ve

been keeping in touch with the legitimate government in Kiev and the people of Ukraine to ensure

that they are the ones who choose their future.

Geoffrey Pyatt, Kiev 

The writer is the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine. 

Details:  http://ukraine.usembassy.gov/statements/amb-wp.html

3 April 2014 - The European Parliament – MEPs cut customs duties for Ukraine imports

About 98% of the customs duties that Ukrainian iron, steel, farm produce and machinery exporters

pay at EU borders will be removed by a proposal backed by European Parliament on Thursday.

This unilateral measure will boost Ukraine’s struggling economy by saving its manufacturers and

exporters €487 million a year.

"The European Parliament has supported an EU path for Ukraine for many years. This is our first

chance to demonstrate our support in practical terms, to help Ukraine during its current economic

crisis in the face of dwindling currency reserves and increased pressure from the Kremlin", said

rapporteur Pawel Zalewski (EPP, PL).

"As Putin closes Russian markets for Ukrainian exports, we are opening them" he added.

The European Parliament backed his proposal by 531 votes to 88, with 20 abstentions.

Which tariffs will be cut?

This unilateral trade measure, set to apply from May 2014, will remove 94.7% of EU tariffs

currently charged on industrial goods imports from Ukraine and reduce them for the remaining

handful of industrial goods.

It will also remove EU tariffs on over 80% of Ukraine’s farm produce exports. However, the EU will

restrict the amounts of “sensitive” products, such as cereals, pork, beef, poultry, and processed

food, that may be imported tariff free, so as not to harm the interests of EU producers of these

products.

A temporary and unilateral measure

This EU trade “preference” measure does not require Ukraine to reciprocate by removing its own

customs duties on imports from the EU, but will require it not to raise them.

EU imports from Ukraine will nonetheless have to comply with EU rules on origin labeling and the

Ukrainian authorities will have to ensure that third country goods disguised as Ukrainian ones do

not enter the EU via Ukraine.

The measure also entitles the EU to reimpose tariffs if imports from Ukraine flood the EU market in

volumes that cause, or threaten to cause, serious difficulties to EU producers of the same goods.

It would apply from the date when it is finally approved until 1 November 2014, or until the EU-

Ukraine association agreement, including a deep and comprehensive trade deal which foresees

bilateral liberalization of trade, enters into force.

Next steps

The measure still requires the formal approval of the EU Council of Ministers. EU foreign policy

chief Catherine Ashton has already announced that the preferences “will start to be applied within

a few weeks”.

Procedure: Co-decision, first reading agreement

Details: http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/press_corner/all_news/news/2014/2014_04_03_01_en.htm

3 April 2014 - The United States - ‘No Decisions About Ukraine Without Ukraine,’ Kerry Says

After meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Paris, Secretary of State John Kerry

says they agreed that the crisis in Ukraine requires a diplomatic resolution and that further talks

must include the Ukrainians.

Kerry emphasized that “diplomacy has a critical role to play in helping the people of Ukraine to

achieve their goal of living in dignity and in a stable, peaceful and unified democracy.”

During a four-hour meeting with Lavrov, Kerry said he made it clear that the United States still

considers the Russian actions in the Crimean Peninsula “to be illegal and illegitimate.” Kerry also

said that the “Russians’ actions over the past several weeks have placed it at odds, obviously, with

the rule of law and the international community, and we still believe on the wrong side of history.”

The U.N. General Assembly, the European Union, the Organization for Security and Co-operation

in Europe and the Group of Seven major economies condemned Russia’s aggressive acts in the

Crimean region of Ukraine.

The OSCE Permanent Council decided in a special session on Ukraine March 21 to deploy an

OSCE Special Monitoring Mission of international observers to Ukraine with the aim of helping

reduce tensions and fostering peace, stability and security, OSCE Chairperson-in-Office and Swiss

Foreign Minister Didier Burkhalter said in Bern, Switzerland.

Kerry flew to Paris to meet with Lavrov at the Russian ambassador’s residence March 30 after

Russian President Vladimir Putin called President Obama to discuss the situation in Ukraine two

days earlier. During the call, Obama also urged Putin to withdraw tens of thousands of Russian

combat soldiers from the border it shares with Ukraine, according to the White House.

“The United States is consulting with Ukraine at every step of this process, and we will not accept a

path forward where the legitimate government of Ukraine is not at the table,” Kerry told journalists.

“This principle is clear: No decisions about Ukraine without Ukraine.”

Before his meeting with Foreign Minister Lavrov, Kerry spoke with Ukrainian Prime Minister

Arseniy Yatsenyuk to repeat the United States’ commitment to coordinate closely with Ukraine and

to sustain support throughout this process.

Both the United States and Russia offered suggestions on how to de-escalate the security and

political crisis in and around Ukraine, Kerry said. According to the secretary, they agreed to work

with the Ukrainian government to implement steps that they already are taking to meet certain

priorities, including these:

• Protecting the rights of national minorities.

• Securing language rights.

• Demobilizing and disarming irregular forces and what they called provocateurs.

• Ensuring an inclusive constitutional reform process.

• Holding free and fair elections monitored by the international community.

Kerry also told journalists that any real progress in Ukraine must include a pullback of the large

Russian military force massed along Ukraine’s borders. Kerry said that “these forces are creating a

climate of fear and intimidation in Ukraine.”

For its part, Lavrov told journalists, Russia seeks to create a loose federation of Ukrainian regions

where each chooses its own economic, financial, social, linguistic and religious governing models.

Kerry said it is not up to the United States and Russia to make decisions regarding federalization

for Ukraine.

“It’s up to Ukrainians, and Ukrainians will decide their future for themselves, by themselves, with

respect to what kind of definitions work for them,” Kerry said.

Details:  http://usembassykyiv.wordpress.com/2014/04/03/no-decisions-about-ukraine-without-ukraine-kerry-says/

2 April 2014 -  The United States / The European Union – Joint Press Statement EU-U.S. Energy Council

Following is the text of the Joint Press Statement from the EU-U.S. Energy Council meeting in

Brussels, Belgium.

Begin Text:

1. The fifth EU-U.S. Energy Council met today in Brussels, chaired by EU High

Representative/Vice President Catherine Ashton, EU Commissioner for Energy Günther Oettinger,

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, and U.S. Deputy Secretary of Energy Daniel Poneman.

Minister Ioannis Maniatis of the Greek Ministry of Environment, Energy and Climate Change

represented the rotating EU Presidency. The Energy Council, a forum on EU-U.S. energy priorities,

promotes transparent and secure global energy markets; fosters policy and regulatory cooperation

on efficient and sustainable energy use; and pursues joint research and development on clean

energy technologies. These actions boost economic growth and jobs, enhance energy security and

international cooperation, and highlight the importance and urgency of tackling global energy and

climate challenges.

2. Developments in Ukraine have brought energy security concerns to the fore and prove the need

to reinforce energy security in Europe. The EU and the United States re-affirmed their

condemnation of the illegal annexation of Crimea to Russia. The EU and United States recognised

that our energy security concerns and those of our friends and partners pose common challenges,

and are considering new collaborative efforts to address these challenges. The Council

underscored that energy relations with Russia must be based on reciprocity, transparency,

fairness, non-discrimination, openness to competition and continued cooperation to ensure a level

playing field for the safe and secure supply of energy.

3. The Council affirmed its strong support for Ukraine’s efforts to diversify its supplies of natural

gas including through the rapid enhancement of reverse flow capacities, increased gas storage

capacity, and decisive measures recently announced with the IMF to build a competitive energy

economy. The Council also welcomed the firm commitment of the Ukrainian Government to

transform its system of subsidised consumer energy prices into targeted measures that mitigate

the impact of price increases on the poor and vulnerable. The EU and the United States will work

with Ukraine and international partners to extend best international practice as Ukraine takes these

steps. The EU and the United States also welcome the determination of the Ukrainian government

to pursue energy efficiency, market transparency, and the long overdue restructuring and reform of

Naftogaz. The Council emphasised that all near-term actions to improve Ukraine’s energy security

should be pursued in the context of a strategic vision of full integration into the European energy

market. In this context, the Council reaffirmed its commitment to work with Ukraine on the

legislative and regulatory reforms necessary to realise this vision and support it along its path.

4. The Council commended the efforts of the EU and of its Member States at the European Council

of 20-21 March 2014 to address the issue of external energy dependency through a further

diversification of supplies and routes, increased energy efficiency, smart grids, improving the

opportunity for the integration of renewable energy into the network and increased production of

domestic energy resources. The Council further welcomed the prospect of U.S. LNG exports in the

future since additional global supplies will benefit Europe and other strategic partners. The Council

also welcomed the negotiations towards a comprehensive and ambitious Trans-Atlantic Trade and

Investment Partnership (TTIP) whose early conclusion would further underscore the strategic

significance of the transatlantic relationship.

5. The Council affirmed its commitment to support the EU’s efforts to rapidly complete an

integrated, common European energy market to bring the benefit of greater energy security and

more competitive energy prices to all Member States and neighbouring states in the Energy

Community. The recent adoption of EU Projects of Common Interest, along with the continuing

efforts to develop harmonised network codes, will further reduce the vulnerabilities of EU Member

States to supply disruption and diversify electricity and gas routes. The Council noted the

importance of developing interconnections to put an end to any isolation of Member States from

European gas and electricity networks by 2015. The Council further affirmed the importance of

developing all energy sources in meeting European demand, as well as the need to increase

energy efficiency efforts as a central element in European energy strategy.

6. The Council reaffirmed the importance of the Southern Gas Corridor to bring gas to Europe,

urged for timely construction of a dedicated, scalable pipeline which keeps the options open for

additional supplies, and agreed to explore investments to strengthen gas supplies to Central and

Southeast Europe. The Council also recognised the Republic of Moldova’s plans to interconnect its

gas and power systems with EU networks.

7. The Council noted the shared objectives of the EU and United States in evolving energy policies

in a manner that supports a transition to a low-carbon economy. The Council welcomed President

Obama’s Climate Action Plan and noted the work underway on the EU 2030 Climate and Energy

Package to address key sources of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States and the

European Union respectively. With respect to post-2020 climate action, the Council reaffirmed our

mutual determination to work towards the adoption in Paris in 2015 of a protocol, another legal

instrument or an agreed outcome with legal force under the United Nations Framework Convention

on Climate Change applicable to all Parties, to strengthen the multilateral, rules-based regime. In

that context, the Council committed to cooperate further to address the need for fuel diversification

in emerging economies and the importance of transitioning to competitive, safe and sustainable

low carbon energy systems, notably through further development and deployment of renewable

energies, energy efficiency, and deployment of carbon capture storage and utilisation. Continued

innovation and investment in these areas will bring benefits in terms of energy cost savings and

jobs, and contribute to the fight against climate change. The Council welcomed the emphasis that

many countries and international bodies, including the World Bank, the OECD and the G-20 place

on the phase-out of inefficient fossil fuel subsidies. The Council underscored the importance of

addressing energy access and energy poverty issues in developing countries in ways that are

consistent with a global transition to a low carbon economy.

8. The Council underlined the importance of the continued co-operation in the Energy Council

Working Groups on Technology and Policy, in particular the work on smart grids including energy

storage, materials including critical materials, nuclear fusion and hydrogen and fuel cells in the

framework of the Technology Working Group and on energy efficiency, nuclear and offshore

safety, and unconventional hydrocarbons in the Policy Working Group, as well as under

international nuclear energy research initiatives.

9. Given the inherently global nature of energy security, the EU and the United States welcomed

the announcement that G-7 energy ministers will soon meet to discuss ways to strengthen

collective energy security and chart a path forward for collaboration. The Council encouraged the

G-7 energy ministers to discuss these and other critical energy security issues at their upcoming

meeting and to work with the EU and other strategic partners to establish an actionable,

sustainable path forward for collective energy security.

Details: http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2014/04/224288.htm

2 April 2014 – OSCE – Press Release Regarding the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine

The Permanent Council of the OSCE has reached consensus on establishing an OSCE Special

Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, in view of the developments in the country. In this context, the

deployment of observers from various OSCE countries has already begun in Ukraine.

Retired Ambassador Ertugrul Apakan, an experienced and distinguished diplomat and former

Undersecretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Turkey has been appointed as the Head of the

Special Monitoring Mission as of 2 April 2014. Candidates from Switzerland and the UK will be

assigned as deputies to Ambassador Apakan.

During his tenure as the Permanent Representative of Turkey to the United Nations between 2009-

2012, Ambassador Apakan has effectively represented Turkey at the UN Security Council on the

occasion of Turkey’s non-permanent membership. In this capacity, he also played a leading role in

preventive diplomacy, reconciliation and peace initiatives on UN’s agenda.

Turkey will also deploy observers in the OSCE Special Monitoring Mission in Ukraine which has

been established for an initial period of six months.

Details: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/no_-102_-2-april-2014_-press-release-regarding-the-osce-special-monitoring-mission-in-ukraine.en.mfa

1 April 2014 - The Government of Germany / The Government of France / The Government of Poland – Joint Statement on Ukraine of the Weimar Triangle Foreign Ministers Frank-Walter Steinmeier (Germany), Laurent Fabius (France), and Radoslaw Sikorski (Poland) in Weimar

We, the Foreign Ministers of the Weimar Triangle, are deeply concerned about the crisis in Europe

we are currently experiencing. Ever since our joint visit in Kyiv in February, we have jointly been

trying to find ways to de-escalate the situation.

In this context, we welcome the recent deployment of the OSCE Monitoring Mission as a first de-

escalating step in the right direction. The international observers will gain an objective picture of

the situation and will contribute to reducing tensions and fostering peace, stability and security. It is

important that the mission has full access throughout Ukraine. We will continue our endeavours to

strengthen the role of the OSCE for the resolution of the crisis.

Following the European Council meeting we invite the EU to step up efforts to use the instruments

at its disposal to help de-escalate the situation.

By Crimea’s annexation Russia violates Ukrainian sovereignty and territorial integrity. This is a

breach of the Ukrainian constitution and of international law. We do condemn this act of aggression

unambiguously.

We jointly advocate for a common European response to this challenge. We will not accept a

policy that divides and splits Ukraine, or that seeks to transpose the action taken in Crimea to other

parts of Ukraine or other Eastern European partner countries. If Russia were to pursue this course,

we would support taking new strong action, including in the economic field.

Tomorrow NATO Foreign Ministers will extensively deal with this crisis. We, the Foreign Ministers

of the Weimar Triangle, will advocate a threefold approach for the Alliance: We should reassure

the security of our Allies, we should thoroughly analyze and readjust our relationship with Russia in

light of recent developments and we should enhance engagement with our Partners, in particular

with Ukraine in the context of the Ukrain-Nato Council.

At the same time, we acknowledge that Russia and Ukraine have always had special and strong

ties based on history, economy and culture. These ties must be developed in the spirit of good

neighbourly relations, mutual interest, genuine partnership and on the basis of Ukraine’s territorial

integrity and sovereignty.

The Eastern Partnership was established as a policy supporting democratic, economic and social

reforms in the Eastern neighbourhood. Its goal is to assist our Partners in building strong, stable,

prosperous and citizen-oriented states and to facilitate people to people contacts. This is also in

the interest of Russia.

Therefore, we will continue our policy and ensure that the Eastern Partnership countries are not

faced with a stark choice – either moving closer to the EU or working with Russia in a

comprehensive manner. Neither the Eastern Partnership of the EU nor the bilateral agreements

the EU concludes with its partners are directed against Russia.

On 21 March, the EU signed the political provisions of the Association Agreement with Ukraine,

which provide key impetus in the sphere of the development of the rule of law, and commitment

itself to sign the remainder of the Association Agreement and Deep and Comprehensive Free

Trade Area. In addition to that, in order to support the stabilisation of Ukraine’s fragile economy,

the EU will unilaterally remove custom duties and provide financial support. In order to send a

strong signal of support, consolidate international support efforts and discuss necessary reforms,

we suggest to hold a conference on gathering international support, including technical assistance

for Ukraine after the presidential elections. We would greatly appreciate Russian participation.

We welcome the staff-level agreement of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) with the

authorities of Ukraine on an economic reform program that can be supported by a two-year Stand-

By Arrangement (SBA) and look forward to its endorsement by the IMF Executive Board. We

furthermore encourage the Russian Federation to contribute to the economic stabilization of

Ukraine, in particular by facilitating trade under WTO rules and proposing fair gas prices to

Ukraine.

On 21 March, the EU also decided to advance the signature of the Association Agreements with

Georgia and Moldova. Moldova will soon profit from a visa-free regime with the EU; with Georgia

significant progress in the framework of the Action Plan on visa liberalization has already been

made. These are strong messages of our support and reflect the achievements of Moldova and

Georgia. We are ready to provide further support after signature of the Association Agreement and

to assist during the phase of implementation.

As witnesses of the 21 February agreement, we encourage the Ukrainian authorities to ensure that

key principles contained in the agreement become part of Ukrainian policy. This would also

contribute to the implementation of the Association Agreement:

First: Inclusiveness: We encourage the government in Kyiv to reach out towards all regions of

Ukraine and to ensure the representative nature and inclusiveness of governmental structures.

Second: Democracy: Presidential elections must take place on May 25, be thoroughly prepared

and be free and fair. In the same vein we would welcome a time table for the process leading to a

constitutional reform.

Third: Reconciliation: All sides must join in the effort to fully investigate all human rights violations

and acts of violence. We encourage the Ukrainian leadership to accelerate the ongoing process of

disarmament, re-establish the state monopoly on the use of force as well as distance itself from

extremist groups.

Russia now bears great responsibility. We call upon Russia to refrain from any further escalation of

the situation within Ukraine and reduce its military posture along the Russian-Ukrainian border.

The same applies to other Eastern Partnership countries.

We support continued observer missions in Ukraine in the framework of the Vienna Document and

the Open Skies Treaty, and we call on Russia to accept further missions on its territory beyond

quota obligations.

We strongly advocate a meaningful dialogue between Ukraine and Russia, as a central step for de-

escalation and the establishment of a mechanism to solve current outstanding issues related to

military, economic and social issues.

Accompanying such a dialogue, we propose EU-Russia talks with Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia

about the consequences of the EU-Association Agreements with Eastern European Partners for

both sides.

We remain available for good offices to foster the spirit of the Agreement signed on February 21 in

Kyiv.

 Details: http://www.india.diplo.de/Vertretung/indien/en/__pr/Politics__News/Weimar-Triangle-Ukraine.html

1 April 2014 - The European Commission  - Preparing Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova for association with EU

In the context of growing regional pressures on Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova, and delivering on

its pledge to coordinate international assistance to Ukraine, the European Commission agreed

with International Financial Institutions (IFIs) in the presence of EU Commissioner  Štefan Füle on

1 April in Brussels to spearhead enhanced assistance measures to the three countries.

The assistance measures will notably support Ukraine to implement the IMF-backed reform

package agreed on 27 March; they will also support the implementation of Association

Agreements, including Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Areas, signed, or shortly to be signed

between the EU and Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova. Priority investment projects for the three

countries will be based on a mix of funds, subsidies and loans, from a range of different actors

(referred to as `blending`).

Through the unprecedented international assistance package being prepared for Ukraine and

measures to further assist Georgia and Moldova in near future, the EU and international partners

step up their support to these countries` efforts to reform their economies and create the conditions

for growth and employment in a competitive international market. This meeting is part of the follow

up to the  European Commission`s support to Ukraine announced on 5 March  for an amount of 11

billion euros. "The European Commission is preparing a large programme  of 355 million euros

(grant) to support Ukraine`s transition through a State Building Contract", explained Commissioner

Füle, EU Commissioner in charge of Enlargement and European Neighbourhood Policy.

Details:  http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_STATEMENT-14-90_en.htm

1 April 2014 – NATO – Statement by NATO-Ukraine Commission

We, the Foreign Ministers of the NATO-Ukraine Commission, are united in our condemnation of

Russia’s illegal military intervention in Ukraine, and Russia’s violation of Ukraine’s sovereignty and

territorial integrity. We do not recognize Russia’s illegal and illegitimate “annexation” of Crimea. We

will continue to work together to reach a political and diplomatic solution which respects

international law and Ukraine’s internationally recognized borders.

We call on Russia to de-escalate by reducing its troops in Crimea to pre-crisis levels and

withdrawing them to their bases; to reduce its military activities along the Ukrainian border; to

reverse the illegal and illegitimate “annexation” of Crimea; to refrain from any further interference

and aggressive actions in Ukraine; to respect the rights of the Ukrainian population including the

Crimean Tatars; and to fulfil its international obligations and to abide by international law.

We support the deployment of an OSCE monitoring mission to Ukraine.

We commend the Armed Forces of Ukraine for their courage, discipline and restraint, in the face of

provocation.

As a tangible demonstration of Allied commitment to the Distinctive Partnership between NATO

and Ukraine, we have agreed on concrete measures to enhance Ukraine’s ability to provide for its

own security.

NATO and Ukraine will intensify cooperation and promote defence reforms through capacity

building and capability development programmes. NATO Allies will also reinforce the NATO

Liaison Office in Kyiv with additional experts.

Allies will continue working together with the Ukrainian government, the Verkhovna Rada and civil

society to strengthen civilian control over the armed forces and related security sectors.

Allies support the measures taken by the Ukrainian government to advance reforms and to

promote an inclusive political process, based on democratic values, respect for human rights,

minorities and the rule of law.

We welcome Ukraine’s signature of the political chapters of the Association Agreement with the

European Union on 21 March.

An independent, sovereign and stable Ukraine, firmly committed to democracy and the rule of law,

is key to Euro-Atlantic security. Allies firmly support Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.

We call on Russia to abide by these principles.

Details:  http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_108499.htm

1 April 2014 - The United States – Statement by the Press Secretary on Ukraine

The President welcomes today’s congressional action to finalize an assistance package for

Ukraine.  This legislation will allow us to provide crucial support to Ukraine through loan

guarantees that will facilitate access to needed financing to Ukraine as it takes essential steps to

restore economic stability and return to growth and prosperity.  The Administration supports the

targeted sanctions authority provided in the bill to impose costs on individuals and entities who are

responsible for acts of violence against the Ukrainian people or are undermining Ukraine’s peace,

stability, sovereignty, or territorial integrity.  Together with our international partners, the President

will continue to build support for the Ukrainian people at this critical time.  We also continue to urge

Republicans in Congress to stop blocking important IMF reforms to ensure the IMF has the

resources it needs to fulfill its mission and expand the tools available for Ukraine and other

countries.

 Details:   http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/04/01/statement-press-secretary-ukraine